| ▲ | Apple Creator Studio(apple.com) |
| 293 points by lemonlime227 3 hours ago | 256 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | jasongill 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's $12.99/mo or $129/yr for a subscription that includes Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, Pixelmator Pro, Motion, Compressor, MainStage, Keynote, Pages, and Numbers Educational discount with verification required drops the price to $2.99/mo / $29.99/yr. The regular-price subscription includes family sharing, education price does not. One-time purchase versions remain available: Final Cut Pro ($299.99), Logic Pro ($199.99), Pixelmator Pro ($49.99), Motion ($49.99), Compressor ($49.99), and MainStage ($29.99). Comes out January 28th |
| |
| ▲ | jasoneckert 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The most important benefits in my opinion are choice and price - people like me who prefer to buy software outright can still do so at a reasonable cost, while others who opt for a subscription can also do so (again, at a reasonable cost). | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's pretty clever that they keep the "pay one time" option still alive while announcing the availability of subscription, so anyone who says "Boo, not you too Apple" can easily be shut down with "You still have the option to buy it!" instead of leaving those critics without answers. Of course, they'll eventually remove the option to buy the software by paying once, I think everyone can see the writing on the wall, but still clever of them to choose to do it later for PR purposes. 1-0 to Apple :) | | |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Office 365 - the subscription version of Office - was released in 2011. Microsoft still offers a one time purchase of Office. There is precedent for Bigcorp keeping a one time purchase version and offer a prescription. | | |
| ▲ | nialse 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The one-time purchase version of Microsoft Office is not available worldwide. Where offered, it is reduced to Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote, with Outlook as a Business edition extra. Individual apps can sometimes be bought separately, but pricing usually makes this impractical. This is to push buyers to Microsoft 365 subscriptions which is the primary product. | |
| ▲ | Plasmoid2000ad 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes - but perpetual purchases have an interesting gotcha that Microsoft didn't realise at first. To encourage subscription over perpetual, ongoing or evergreen updates are limited to subscription version. Office 2024 has every feature that was added since Office 2021 to the subscription version - while a chunk of loyal customers are unaware of them.
Back when Google was competing hard with Google Suite, a big perception problem formed with the perpetual customers believing and convincing others that Google were far ahead, with collab editing and other features - after Office had added equivalent. So for me, If there's a subscription and one-time option - I wonder if the one-time gets all updates going forward. If it doesn't, I realise that they'll regret that if competition picks up, and try to fix it later.
If it does include updates... I worry it will be like many other lifetime updates one-time purchases - when competition is low they'll renege on that promise. | | |
| ▲ | BeetleB 19 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > To encourage subscription over perpetual, ongoing or evergreen updates are limited to subscription version. Of course ... ? Before the subscription model, you wouldn't get free Office upgrades. | | |
| ▲ | albedoa 7 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yes. That sentence is setup for the speculation in the third paragraph. Folks in this sub-thread are wondering how the one-time price option plays out with Apple Creator Studio. |
| |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | So far from what I can tell, Final Cut Pro has gotten perpetual updates. Since you can only buy it via the Mac App Store, ther can’t do upgrade pricing. |
| |
| ▲ | addandsubtract 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | *Microsoft 365 Copilot | | |
| ▲ | systemtest 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Please note that you need Microsoft 365 Copilot Live Essentials for Business Premium if you want InsightDeck (formally PowerPoint) included. | | |
| ▲ | patapong an hour ago | parent [-] | | I had to google this to see if it was satire... What have we come to |
|
| |
| ▲ | PinguTS 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Actually, you can buy only the 2024 version of MS Office for Mac, while the subscription is more up to date. You cannot buy a packaged 2025 version. |
| |
| ▲ | alwa 12 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Final Cut Pro X has been available for purchase (at the same price, IIRC) for well over a decade now. Pro feathers were ruffled at the time they leapt from FCP7 to FCPX: the $299 price point was something like 1/4 of the going rate for its predecessors, was Apple planning to abandon its pros for the consumer market? Well. Here we are almost 15 years later, and if you paid the one-time price back then, you're still getting free updates today (at least on desktop). And you can still buy in with 299 2025 dollars, rather than 299 2011 dollars. At the time, the common wisdom was that they'd go the same route as Adobe: you'd have to buy Final Cut X+1 in a couple years for another $299, and Final Cut X+2 a couple years after that... to their credit, that's not the way it's gone. So that way, I imagine, all the film folks have a little more money to chuck at their high-powered Mac hardware budgets in the next refresh cycle instead... An evergreen Final Cut Pro license costs almost as much as 1TB of SSD from those guys! | |
| ▲ | groundzeros2015 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You are complaining about a problem that hasn’t happened yet and there is no inherent reason it will happen. | |
| ▲ | smugma 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Many years ago Apple reduced their pricing on many of these apps. They also made their OS updates free. Apple wants its customers to buy/subscribe to these tools so that you’re in the Apple ecosystem and buy more hardware and services. Unlike Adobe, they have profit-maximizing incentives to let you stay on the buy/rent model that you prefer. | |
| ▲ | handsclean 38 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The other thing that’s going to go away is purchasing only what you need. I want exactly one of these apps, I bet virtually nobody uses all of them, and yet the suckers are going to be telling us that being made to buy stuff we don’t want or use is “more value”. | | |
| ▲ | smith7018 26 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > and yet the suckers are going to be telling us that being made to buy stuff we don’t want or use is “more value”. You're making up an individual to get mad at for no reason. > The other thing that’s going to go away is purchasing only what you need There is no proof of this. So you're making up a situation to get mad at for no reason. > I want exactly one of these apps Perfect, Apple lets you buy the one app you want for a reasonable price! So what's the issue? |
| |
| ▲ | whycome 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Why do you think they will remove the option to buy the software?
They’ve kept the model for years. They’re targeting different audiences with the move. | |
| ▲ | alwillis 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Of course, they'll eventually remove the option to buy the software by paying once, I think everyone can see the writing on the wall There's no indication Apple is planning to end the option of paying once for these apps. Apple introduced subscriptions for Final Cut and Logic nearly three years ago [1]; this isn't new by any means. Pages, Numbers and Keynote remain available at no cost. [1]: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023/05/apple-brings-final-cu... | |
| ▲ | philipallstar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > so anyone who says "Boo, not you too Apple" can easily be shut down with "You still have the option to buy it!" instead of leaving those critics without answers This is like saying that it's clever for Mars to keep Mars Bars while launching a new bar, as it "shuts down" complaints that Mars Bars will no longer exist. | |
| ▲ | SunshineTheCat 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yea I've already purchased some of these apps so I was not going to thrilled if they pulled an Adobe and made me pay for an overpriced subscription on top of it >:( | | |
| ▲ | james-bcn 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > overpriced Seriously? This is incredibly reasonable. | | |
| ▲ | pantulis 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's not outrageous, for sure, specially if you happen to have a use case for all the bundled apps. But things change if you consider that the one time payment for Logic Pro equals about 18 months of the subscription. In my case, I bought Logic Pro in 2013 for 180€. Obviously a subscription seems expensive no matter what the price is. | | |
| ▲ | smith7018 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | If a students needs Logic Pro for 3 months for a class then they can get it (with the other apps) for $9 total ($6 if you count the free month). That makes more sense than a one time fee of $200. On the other hand, if you're planning to use the software for over a decade like yourself then $200 is very cheap. | |
| ▲ | dylan604 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | So you bought Logic Pro vX for 180€. Did you receive Logic Pro vX++ for free? | | |
| ▲ | wrs an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yes, Logic updates have been free for many years. FCP as well. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > It's pretty clever that they keep the "pay one time" option still alive while announcing the availability of subscription, so anyone who says "Boo, not you too Apple" can easily be shut down with "You still have the option to buy it!" Probably not. Those customers are almost completely irrelevant and not people who Apple or anybody else cares about. They won't mind if you kick and scream. | |
| ▲ | TheCraiggers 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > but still clever of them to choose to do it later for PR purposes. 1-0 to Apple :) They're doing it because it makes them more money. Corporations are not your friend. | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes, of course, ultimately every choice they ever do is for money, because they're a for-profit company. But maybe we can be slightly more granular about exactly how that choice makes them more money, which is because it gives them good PR. I was just being more specific, but we're saying the same thing :) | |
| ▲ | stanmancan 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Parent isn’t insinuating otherwise. They’re saying the subscription model is more lucrative, so eventually they’ll remove the one time payment option, but keeping it as an option for the announcement keeps the bad PR at bay. | |
| ▲ | virgil_disgr4ce 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | "PR purposes" IS doing it for money |
|
| |
| ▲ | dylan604 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | So what about next year when all of the apps receive updates/upgrades? Will the paid-in-full versions receive the upgrade for free, or will they have upgrade prices? I remember the days of Adobe's annual version upgrades, and they were at least $99 per app. Using that as the basis, the Adobe subscription plan is not more expensive that just broken up into 12 payments. People that kept running v4 to avoid the upgrade prices eventually got left out as they could not open files provided to them from others using the most recent version. Let's not forget our history on the one-time purchase pros/cons | | |
| ▲ | wrs 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | These apps have provided free updates after initial purchase for many years already. It would be big news if that stopped. | | | |
| ▲ | larkost 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | These are being sold on Apple's AppStore, and there the model is that you get all of the updates for that App. Of course there is the work-around that some apps use, which is to create a new App (i.e.: MyApp vs MyApp2), which Apple could do at some point in the future. The best one to watch at the moment is if Pixelmater Pro license holders from before it was bought by Apple get access to any of the new improvements. |
| |
| ▲ | NBJack 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For now. Let's not forget MS Office had a period like that as well. I give it five years max. | |
| ▲ | concinds 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | All companies should do this. Sometimes I want a one-time purchase. Sometimes I want to try the program for a few months and I prefer a cheap subscription over a big upfront cost. And very, very rarely, I'll prefer the subscription, even though it's more expensive over time, to support a cool indie studio with recurring revenue instead of one-time purchases that may dry up and lead to lack of interest from the devs. | | |
| ▲ | dylan604 an hour ago | parent [-] | | This is my argument for the Adobe subscription. One day, I'm a photographer needing apps like Photoshop and Lightroom and After Effects (because I do a lot of timelapse). One day, I'm a graphic designer, so I need Photoshop and Illustrator. One day, I'm an editor, so Photoshop, Premiere, Illustrator, and After Effects. One day, I'm doing desktop publishing with Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign. |
| |
| ▲ | Someone1234 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For *now. Adobe also started out as a choice between subscription or buying. The only thing maybe keeping Apple honest is that their stuff isn't as popular. | |
| ▲ | iAMkenough 43 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Except certain features in the software will be reserved for subscribers only. |
| |
| ▲ | btown an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As someone who's loved Logic Pro since the days before Apple bought Emagic, this is amazing that it will be accessible to a broader audience. There are many discussions e.g. https://gearspace.com/board/music-computers/1433515-why-does... about the reasons for its popularity, but one stands out to me - its event data model. There are far too many tools out there (from FL Studio on one end, to MuseScore on the other) that present piano-roll-based rapid prototyping and traditional western score notation as diametric opposites. From day 1, Logic challenged itself "what if we can use the same event-based data model to render both." None of this complexity is hidden - you can edit the raw event stream directly. If you're a developer familiar with, say, React, it makes music creation quite intuitive - everything from visual to audio output is a function of a transparently formatted data store. And while that has its challenges, and some of the UX innovations of e.g. MuseScore have been slower to arrive in Logic, because of this "dual life" it's unmatched as a pedogogical tool, and a professional creative tool as well. | |
| ▲ | thecupisblue 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That's actually surprisingly cheap compared to other subscriptions in the industry, especially for such a high powered suite. | | |
| ▲ | jonwinstanley 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | As long as you buy a macbook to use it on, they are happy | | |
| ▲ | dylan604 an hour ago | parent [-] | | They'd be even happier if you bought one of the Mac Studios or Mac Pro. Please, someone, anyone. |
| |
| ▲ | philistine an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The competition for the Creator Studio is not exactly Adobe. Of course Apple will be happy to build on their offerings to be able to really take on Adobe, but this subscription is priced to compete with the online services popping up from nowhere that have stolen the ease of use market away from Adobe. The real competition in this market in 2026 is Canva. | |
| ▲ | brk an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That was my thinking. I already use several of these apps, the $130/mo. is a no brainer to pick up the others. | |
| ▲ | rchaud 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Get them in the door now and jack up the price later. | |
| ▲ | Towaway69 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Undercut the competition until there is no competition, then raise prices or have I missed something? Ah, yes - cross finance your loses by selling compute in your own data centres / hosting service because you can. | | |
| ▲ | thecupisblue 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I would assume it's because younger generations of creatives are using their software less and less, increasing the risk of losing the market completely on the software side. At this pricing, more of them will turn to paying Apple rather than paying for multiple services, keeping them tied into the ecosystem. Also so many people are paying for Canva, Capcut etc that taking a piece of that cake is quite a low hanging fruit if you have a distribution platform. | | |
| ▲ | no_wizard 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The acquisition of the Affinity software by Canva I imagine motivated this. It’s even a similar pricing model, though technically with Pages / Numbers / Keynote covers a little more ground but I think the main intent is to get creatives using Apple’s creative software again Pixelmator being the only 3rd party software because Apple never made a competitor to Photoshop Though since Canva went full on toward more robust tools I imagine they have started capturing the entire editing chain more than they did 2-3 years ago, hence the Affinity acquisition | | |
| |
| ▲ | exitb 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Apple doesn't ever need to make much money on this software, when they make money on hardware needed to use it. | | |
| ▲ | sofixa an hour ago | parent [-] | | Apple hardware has "only" a 36% margin, while their software and services have a 75% margin. They definitely want to make more money on software with absurd margins. | | |
| ▲ | bombcar an hour ago | parent [-] | | A huge portion of that margin is from the 33% App Store cut which is infinite margin for them, effectively. "software and services" really should be broken out from the App Store cut. | | |
| ▲ | bee_rider an hour ago | parent [-] | | Is margin profit/revenue or profit/costs? I think it is the former, so it should be “effectively 100%” right? Anyway, this isn’t really a meaningful quibble argument-wise, it is obvious what you mean! |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | crazygringo 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Somehow I don't think Apple is going to put Adobe out of business. | | |
| ▲ | echelon 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | They don't need to. They want marketshare to enhance their other market positions and give them optionality for future strategy. They'd love the whole market, but they don't need it and they won't employ too many resources chasing that. They're a powerful giant with hands in so many places. Each enforcing other endeavors. This encourages people to stay in the Apple hardware ecosystem, for instance. It dog foods their silicon. It keeps people thinking of Apple as the creative brand and operating system. More creatives buying Apple -> more being produced and consumed for and on Apple. Also the strategy of getting kids young has always been genius. They started that in the eighties, I think. |
| |
| ▲ | nozzlegear 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What data centers? Does Apple even have data centers? Can people purchase compute on Apple's data centers? | | |
| ▲ | darrenf 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > What data centers? Does Apple even have data centers? Apple absolutely has data centres. Where do you think Apple TV, Apple Music, iCloud, Maps, etc compute happens? Here's a press release straight from the horse's mouth about one in Denmark, in late 2020: https://www.apple.com/uk/newsroom/2020/09/apple-expands-rene... > Can people purchase compute on Apple's data centers? Not to my knowledge, but that's not saying much. | | |
| ▲ | nozzlegear an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Not to my knowledge, but that's not saying much. But that's the entire crux of their comment: undercut the competition, and make them pay for compute on Apple's data centers. |
|
| |
| ▲ | beernet 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not an Apple fan at all, but damn, in the views of some of the HN community, one can only do wrong. Pathetic. | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Pretty spot on. I think what's new is that Apple is employing this tactic, before they always went with "Our stuff is more expensive because it's better", but as they seem to slightly pivot into other directions now, this choice also seems to align with the new direction. |
|
| |
| ▲ | g947o 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I thought they basically gave away Keynote/Pages etc to anyone with an Apple device? | | |
| ▲ | yohannparis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's literally in the introduction of the page. > plus new AI features and premium content in Keynote, Pages, and Numbers | |
| ▲ | hmbakhsh 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Potentially AI slop features coming to both that they'll charge for? |
| |
| ▲ | kolanos 5 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Does this mean Keynote and Pages are now paid products? Aren't they included with Mac OS? | |
| ▲ | dangoodmanUT 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Thank god they preserved the one time purchase. I bought all of these apps back in like ~2013 and have been using them for literally 13 years with all updates (fcp, compressor, motion) good on them | | |
| ▲ | bombcar an hour ago | parent [-] | | It's rare for a company to not only offer one-time purchases, and keep updating them, but also not rebranding/renaming/version cut-off charging at some point. | | |
| ▲ | tarentel 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It helps that you have to continue to buy their hardware to keep running said software. I guess they could be greedy and keep making me pay for Logic every few years so I'm happy they don't do that but they're still making money off my initial purchase of logic just in a different way. |
|
| |
| ▲ | ksec 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >Comes out January 28th I wonder why? Why not today but 28th of Jan? Part of me thinks M5 MacBook Air and M5 Pro MacBook Pro will also be released on January 28th. | | | |
| ▲ | simjnd 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | But Keynote, Pages and Numbers are already free | | |
| ▲ | aobdev 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | From the subheading: “plus new AI features and premium content in Keynote, Pages, and Numbers” | |
| ▲ | Rebelgecko 13 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Seems like a great "opportunity" for Apple to pump up their Services revenue |
| |
| ▲ | cultofmetatron 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | the other benefit is that subs can be a sort of extended trial. Ive been wanting to try out final cut pro but I don't want to do a full video project if i'm going to be evaluating it. better to have 1-3 months to really know before I plunk down 299 bucks. | | | |
| ▲ | Forgeties79 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not related to your comment exactly but I feel like I need to get this out in this thread somewhere: As someone who defended FCPX and used it professionally for years even when it was at its most hated (2011 or so), it’s been woefully supported the last few years and no one should be on it anymore. Resolve Studio outclasses it top to bottom for the same one-time cost and runs great on both MacOS and Windows. Linux it’s bumpy unfortunately but it does technically run lol | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Resolve Studio outclasses it top to bottom for the same one-time cost and runs great on both MacOS and Windows Best 200-300 EUR I spent some years ago, and still receives free updates, Blackmagic Design is a really nice company. And, not only does Resolve run great on macOS and Windows, they have Linux native builds that run even better than it does with the same hardware using Windows, which is REALLY nice. | | |
| ▲ | Forgeties79 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Oh interesting re: Linux. My understanding was it was rougher but maybe I should try myself! | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Runs like a dream for me, albeit on workstation-hardware so YMMV. It runs better under X than Wayland, at least the version I'm still stuck on, but otherwise the performance is top notch and easily worth a try :) |
|
| |
| ▲ | geerlingguy 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not arguing against Resolve, but FCP is still great for edits. It lacks some flashy social media features and modern conveniences for sure, but it's still a very good and widely used editor. | | |
| ▲ | Forgeties79 an hour ago | parent [-] | | It lacks a lot more than flashy social media features - and given their biggest driver in the 2010’s was arguably YouTubers, they actually need more robust social media features. For starters, they just added voice isolation what? A year ago? That has been bog-standard for resolve and premiere for years now. The audio tools in general are still very subpar. I used it professionally from 2011-2020 or so. Around 2020 the gaps in feature parity became wider and more apparent, it’s clearly not a priority anymore. Once I went to resolve I basically abandoned it. I use maybe every 6mo tops now for quick stuff for friends and family or to open an old project. The one thing I will say is for speed cutting, it’s probably the best. And that’s no small thing! But that’s about it. | | |
| ▲ | bombcar an hour ago | parent [-] | | Based on revenue estimates, if Apple wanted to be competitive here, they could buy Blackmagic for a billion or so ... | | |
| ▲ | qingcharles 28 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It's certainly interesting that Apple have been pushing Blackmagic's products. They practically rely on Blackmagic software for all their demos when they release some new bit of hardware. They totally conceded on the camera app, for instance. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | prodigycorp 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | time to dust off that 20 year old edu email address. with these discounts, college has paid for itself! | | |
| ▲ | yardie 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I finally had to give mine up. Needed to reset the password which required a trip to 4HELP office and I live halfway around the globe now. But the kiddo will be starting college soon so I can mooch off their edu email address. | | |
| ▲ | qingcharles 26 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Ah, I've been mooching off an old library card for years to rent books for my Kindle. Finally got an email saying "Just pop into your local branch to renew this year." Ah... |
| |
| ▲ | SirMaster 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That almost never works for me, they usually use a service that verifies current student enrollment like SheerID. | |
| ▲ | WmWsjA6B29B4nfk 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you are planning anyway to break the terms of the license and effectively steal the software, why even bother paying something for the privilege? Just get it for free, surely it has to be available cracked | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > break the terms of the license and effectively steal the software We're all (mostly/some) software people here, you don't need to use terms established by the "anti-piracy" firms to make your point, no one is "stealing" anything here, even if they were getting it for free from TPB or whatever. | | |
| ▲ | renewiltord 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Indeed. But people are stuck on these archaic unrelated terms for now. AI firms will make the whole thing obsolete while luddites cry about “stealing from artists” and stuff like that. | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 23 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > But people are stuck on these archaic unrelated terms for now Seen it in media for decades at this point, which makes sense, most people can't tell up from down. What's sad is hearing those things echoed here of all places, a community for hackers, and people are repeating the words of the MPAA. |
|
| |
| ▲ | qingcharles 23 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | When I moaned to the Adobe support person about a recent price hike they said "It's a real shame you haven't signed up for a free educational course online, like the ones from Google, that would qualify you for a student plan. Or have you? I'll wait here while you tell me if you are enrolled in one of those free Google courses. Take as long as you need." So now I'm getting an education too. | |
| ▲ | Fnoord 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Cracked software has risks attached to it, such as malware. | |
| ▲ | prodigycorp 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Spare me the morality play. Apple gifted Donald Trump a 24k gold statue! They will gift me an educational discount to Final Cut Pro. | | |
| ▲ | WmWsjA6B29B4nfk 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | There was no morality play. My point is your copy/use of software is equally "illegal" whether you just download a cracked copy or pretend to be an active college student and pay the student price, when you are not in fact an active college student. Either way, you won't have a valid license. So why bother paying? | | |
| ▲ | Forgeties79 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | This is quite the slippery argument IMO. So it’s not about morality, it’s about legality. But also it’s about paying for a valid license, so they shouldn’t pay at all? | |
| ▲ | prodigycorp 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I mean, why not? I barely use FCP, sometimes to trim a movie in places. I'm still going to be subsiding other users. I'd rather not pirate. |
|
| |
| ▲ | lifetimerubyist 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | won't somebody think of the poor trillion dollar company! |
|
| |
| ▲ | drcongo 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That's actually a hell of a deal considering I already pay $5 a month just for Logic on the iPad. | | |
| ▲ | apercu 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I bought Logic maybe 8-9 years ago, and get free upgrades.... If I had paid $5/mo it would already have cost me ~$280.00 more than I paid. Even if I had to purchase an occasional update (assuming they were reasonably priced), I'd still be coming out ahead. I hate "renting" software. | | |
| ▲ | drcongo 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Oh yeah, my Logic for Mac is probably about that age too, but there's no choice to buy it outright on iPad sadly. | | |
| ▲ | Fnoord 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I bought a license for Pixelmator Pro a couple of years ago. IIRC it cost 30 or 40 EUR. I don't use it much, but it is unlikely you're going to need all of that software. | |
| ▲ | apercu an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Oh, didn't know that. That's lame. I could see using an iPad for automation, triggered by midi, but I use an Air for that (and even if I used an my Pro, I still have to use a USB C hub because for some reason Apple things 1 (or 2) USB ports is enough. Sigh. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | deafpolygon an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | My concern here is are they going to start locking features for Pages, Numbers, and Keynote behind a paywall? Yes, it’s free—but will they still have all of the newer features without a subscription? |
|
|
| ▲ | pentagrama 8 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Here is a quick side by side comparison between Apple Creator Studio and the Adobe Creative Cloud suite.
Each app may be stronger or weaker depending on the use case, workflow, and specific user needs, so this is only a rough equivalence. Function | Apple | Adobe | Adobe price / month
--------------------|----------------------|---------------------|--------------------
Image editing | Pixelmator Pro | Photoshop | ~USD 20
Video editing | Final Cut Pro | Premiere Pro | ~USD 23
Motion graphics | Motion | After Effects | ~USD 23
Audio production | Logic Pro | Audition | ~USD 23
Video encoding | Compressor | Media Encoder | Included with Premiere Pro
Live audio | MainStage | No direct equivalent| N/A
Docs/presentations | Keynote/Pages/Numbers| Express/Acrobat | ~USD 10 to 24
--------------------|----------------------|---------------------|--------------------
TOTAL | USD 12.99 / month | ~USD 100+ / month |
| (7 apps bundle) | (5 apps separately)|
| | USD 69.99 / month |
| | (bundle 20+ apps) |
Disclaimer: table formatting assisted by ChatGPT (hope it works on HN). |
|
| ▲ | lemonlime227 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The individual one time purchase versions are still available for all the apps. Final Cut, Logic, Motion, Compressor, and MainStage are offered in a bundle for education by Apple as a $199.99 one time purchase (no education status is verified) [1]. Pixelmator Pro is available as a one time purchase as well for $49.99 [2]. Not included in the Creator Studio is the Lightroom alternative Photomator, which is available as a one time purchase of $119.99. You could recreate just the Creator Studio as a one time $250 purchase, or the entire suite (including Photomator) for $370. Not available for one time purchase are the AI features and templates available for the free apps (Keynote, Pages, Numbers, Freeform). Personally, I'm glad that one time purchases are still options for the core pro suite: long term they do hold value compared to paying Adobe a subscription (or dealing with the high seas on macOS). However, I don't see things like the education bundle sticking around much longer, so purchase it sooner rather than later. [1]: https://www.apple.com/us-edu/shop/product/bmge2z/a/pro-apps-... [2]: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/pixelmator-pro/id1289583905 |
| |
| ▲ | no_wizard 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The inclusion of Pixelmator Pro is simply so they no longer have a hole in the software lineup as a competitor vs Affinity (I think the real competitor to this bundle) and Adobe I think they view Photos as a viable replacement for Lightroom and equivalents. | | |
| ▲ | admp 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Photomator would be a more level Lightroom alternative, odd it's not included in the new Creator Studio package. | | |
| ▲ | AlanYx an hour ago | parent [-] | | That's probably a clue that maintaining Photomator is not on Apple's long-term roadmap. I imagine they'll merge some features into Photos and eventually discontinue it. |
|
| |
| ▲ | silveira an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Thanks for the info, I was looking for this. I have the "Pro Apps Bundle for Education" that I bought years ago and it is an fantastic deal. |
|
|
| ▲ | fidotron 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > These apps will continue receiving updates, with the latest versions adopting the beautiful new visual design language with Liquid Glass on all platforms Are the Apple people really this oblivious, or is someone in PR trolling us? |
| |
| ▲ | pier25 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | They don't have much of a choice. They bet the house on liquid glass and need to keep up appearances. | | |
| ▲ | reddalo 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I think they just need to wait a bit and then present something more sensible as the new hot design. | |
| ▲ | msabalau 21 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | When you are in a hole you can at least stop digging. |
| |
| ▲ | codebyaditya 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I read it less as obliviousness and more as internal language leaking into marketing. What’s “Liquid Glass” to Apple reads like an aesthetic system though but to outsiders it sounds like jargon inflation. I feel the gap between internal coherence and external clarity shows up in these releases a lot. | | |
| ▲ | nottorp 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > like an aesthetic system An idiotic aesthetic system that ignores all the human interface guidelines that the Apple of 30+ years ago helped start. | |
| ▲ | faust201 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Pretty sure these marketing speak was decided half-an-year before. Sales and marketing just do their job /S |
| |
| ▲ | guestbest 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It sounds like internally it’s a checklist item they have to mention everywhere. | | |
| ▲ | cons0le 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yep, it's not trolling, it's just them doing the job. A well paid lawyer will defend a client even if they're guilty | | |
| ▲ | 12345hn6789 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | A well paid lawyer defending a guilty client is upholding the Justice system. Every man has a right to a fair trial. Apple wasting years of everyones time on bad faith UX design |
|
| |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You’ve never worked at BigCorp have you? At Amazon, part of the initial indoctrination when I was hired there was competitive messaging when talking to clients (I worked in ProServe) and what you were never allowed to say. I remember we could never say we had a “moat”. I’m sure there is approved marketing copy. | |
| ▲ | storus 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I guess it's enforced top-down. Yesterday I picked up my MacBook from a logicboard repair and they forced Tahoe on it despite running Sonoma originally so I spent most of yesterday getting rid of Tahoe and reverting back to Sonoma. | | |
| ▲ | Fnoord 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sonoma won't receive updates for long any more. Better off switching to Sequoia. It'll give you 20 months to switch away, instead of 8 months. |
| |
| ▲ | blitzar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | someone in PR is trolling the beatings with liquid glass will continue till morale improves | |
| ▲ | baggachipz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Have you never had to toe a company line before? | |
| ▲ | DonHopkins 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Apple no longer supports GL, so Liquid Glass - GL = Liquid Ass. |
|
|
| ▲ | geerlingguy 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I still miss Aperture. Photos is a far cry still, many years later. Lightroom never matched Aperture's organizational abilities for libraries with tens of thousands of RAW photos. |
| |
| ▲ | canbus 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Tried Darktable? | |
| ▲ | apgwoz 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I’ve been waiting to see what happens with Photomator, and the fact that it’s not being included in anyway here makes me think it might not survive? Either that, or it’s gonna be heavily integrated into Photos… | |
| ▲ | haunter 38 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I wish there was something like GOG but for old general software |
|
|
| ▲ | andsoitis 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, Pixelmator Pro, Motion, Compressor, and MainStage — plus new AI features and premium content in Keynote, Pages, and Numbers — come together in a single subscription So Apple is copying Adobe's business model? |
| |
| ▲ | bayindirh 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | No, all apps are available for purchase for a one time payment. I don't care about video, so I'll be buying Pixelmator now, and maybe music stuff later, and Video part never. So it works like before, if you want. | | |
| ▲ | andrei_says_ a minute ago | parent | next [-] | | Pixelmator is great and integrates well with Apple's tooling for batch processing. For video, the free version of DavinciResolve goes a very long way, and their Studio is a single-payment-life-time license. | |
| ▲ | bearjaws 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Available for purchase... for now. | | |
| ▲ | bayindirh 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The only "...for now" event I have seen in last 20 years of Apple software is iWorks and Mac OS X become free. ...and they integrated some of the Aperture to new Photos app, which is again was a transition to free. Name me something a product, not a service which you can only subscribe in Apple's ecosystem. | | |
| ▲ | arvinsim 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Logic Pro in iPad is subscription only. | | |
| ▲ | asimpletune an hour ago | parent [-] | | They didn’t take away a one-time purchase option for it though. It just never existed to begin with so the op’s point remains. |
| |
| ▲ | ascagnel_ 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Name me something a product, not a service which you can only subscribe in Apple's ecosystem. The shows on Apple TV are only available via a subscription; there's no way to have a perpetual purchase (at least as far as that a la carte style of purchase is perpetual). | | |
| ▲ | dagmx an hour ago | parent [-] | | They specifically said “not a service” and you brought up a service. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | boringg 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Well really they are copying the original Microsofts suite packaging which everyone has copied over the years! But yes specific they are trying to take market share on Adobe. Its actually like taking on MS and Adobe together... but they aren't really taking on MS office. | |
| ▲ | mirzap 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How so? Apple's subscription cancellation is one click away, and you don't get overcharged when canceling. | |
| ▲ | acomjean 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Subscription model so it’s adobes model. But you can buy “one time”. Though they have a tendency to just end product support (aperture software was canceled leaving a lot of bad taste for photographers that used it) Wonder what Adobe thinks of this. Their support for Mac was pretty important in getting OS X off the ground, now they’re competing with a unified stack. When I was a Mac user I remember buying Logic express 9 (I still have the disk). The price is a good deal, but you really are all in forever.. | |
| ▲ | jpalomaki 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Depends on if you are stuck with the subscription for life, or if there's actually a reasonable way to unsubscribe. | | |
| ▲ | bambax 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | You're never free to unsubscribe because you become accustomed to the tools, and use the file formats, etc. (That's why I don't do subscription, ever.) |
| |
| ▲ | Someone 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | FTA: “Alternatively, users can also choose to purchase the Mac versions of Final Cut Pro, Pixelmator Pro, Logic Pro, Motion, Compressor, and MainStage individually as a one-time purchase on the Mac App Store.” | |
| ▲ | tapoxi 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah but this is $129/yr, that's significantly cheaper | | |
| ▲ | whywhywhywhy 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It’s cheap enough it’s not enough to fund development of Final Cut but also not enough money to bother spending time on it. Find it odd personally, just offering them free to keep hardware makes more sense than trying to push a tiny subscription revenue number. | | |
| ▲ | alwillis an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > It’s cheap enough it’s not enough to fund development of Final Cut but also not enough money to bother spending time on it. Find it odd personally, just offering them free to keep hardware makes more sense than trying to push a tiny subscription revenue number. Apple doesn't work that way. Unlike almost all other tech companies that are organized by divisions, Apple uses a functional organizational structure. So all of the software teams are under one head of software; there's no senior vp of the Final Cut division, for example. For accounting purposes, all software is lumped together. Apple made $391 billion in revenue last fiscal year; when you're making that kind of money, you can afford to do things for reasons other than the amount of money you could make. Whatever revenue Final Cut generates isn't required to fund the Final Cut team. | |
| ▲ | vile_wretch 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | $129/year is surely better than $300 once, 15 years ago. Though I'm guessing not offering it for free is to keep it distinct from iMovie and to maintain some semblance of "Pro"-ness (which I'm gathering is up for debate either way.. the last time I did any actual video editing it was on Final Cut Pro 5 so I'm out of the loop) | |
| ▲ | anticorporate 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's the problem that the whole industry is facing - the current generation of hardware is sufficient that hardware refreshes will continue to decline, and companies that want to keep milking us for money regularly need to find a new way to do it. | | |
| ▲ | alwillis an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > the current generation of hardware is sufficient that hardware refreshes will continue to decline If anything, Apple is refreshing their hardware much faster now compared to the Intel days. There's literally a new MacBook Pro and MacBook Air every year. And of course there are 3-4 new iPhones every year. | | | |
| ▲ | no_wizard 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sufficient for whom? At my job they’re still refreshing workstations regularly. They buy and churn hardware on a regular basis. Not quite “buying on release week” basis but some % of employees always getting new hardware at max specs in the design org Makes even engineering jealous sometimes | |
| ▲ | rstupek 33 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I hate subscriptions as much as the next person but how would you pay for continued development of software? Do you say a person can continue to run version X forever but if they want a new version they pay for it? | | |
| ▲ | anticorporate 2 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > Do you say a person can continue to run version X forever but if they want a new version they pay for it? I'm not particularly interested in sustaining the financial growth of software companies. I did that for years and I'm done. But, what you suggest is literally what the software industry did for decades before subscriptions became the norm. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | pier25 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | One might argue it offers significantly less value too. |
| |
| ▲ | F7F7F7 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Adobe invented subscription bundles? In that sense did the Creative Cloud copy iCloud? | |
| ▲ | pjmlp 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | When there are no more new buyers to sell devices, or new versions of existing software packages, the only way to keep the curve growing for shareholders and MBAs is to sell subscriptions. It is also the only way to convince developers to pay for software. Having a part hosted on some server is so much better than whatever anti-piracy schemes one can think of, and provides the continuous growth curve for printing money. Thus subscriptions aren't going away in the modern software world. |
|
|
| ▲ | tomovo an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's a pity Apple didn't choose to acquire Affinity when there was a chance. Pixelmator Pro looks like a toy app compared to Logic or Final Cut. I don't see how it could ever catch up to Photoshop. Even at such small scale it's always been very buggy in my experience and development seems to have stalled (apart from some obligatory AI features). I am glad the standalone purchases are still available and I assume they will stay updated in sync with the subscription-based ones. I would hate my copy of Logic getting slowly obsolete.. |
| |
| ▲ | philistine an hour ago | parent [-] | | Affinity never made mac-assed Mac apps. Pixelmator is more a Mac app than Messages or Music. That's why they bought them instead of Affinity. |
|
|
| ▲ | pjmlp 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I am still waiting for "XCode for iPadOS", where we can have a Smalltalk like approach to development, beyond what Swift Playgrounds allows for. |
| |
| ▲ | kmeisthax 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Unless Apple gets off several high horses regarding code signing and, more importantly, app containerization; any Xcode for iPadOS is going to be useless. Like, imagine Xcode without custom build steps or third-party compilers. The larger problem is that the iPad has a dual nature. At the launch of the product, Apple positioned it as a netbook killer - i.e. a simplified computer for specific tasks, one where the locked down nature of the device might actually be considered a feature. That's why they built everything on iPhone OS[0]. However, there's always been the implication that this is supposed to Someday™ replace the Mac. It keeps getting new features to make it more useful as a computer replacement, which just makes the deliberate restrictions placed on the device more and more glaring. And Apple seems to think they can just keep adding features until they can make you do every computing task wearing a strait-jacket in a padded room. This particular duality came to a head with the Apple Vision Pro. Any app that would actually be useful on a VR headset is either: - Incompatible with Apple's code-signing and containerization requirements (i.e. developer tools) - Not economic to offer at the small scale of the visionOS app market (at least, not while Apple is demanding 30%) - A game (Apple really doesn't wanna talk about the Vision Pro as a games machine) On a related note, Swift Playgrounds stopped getting updates almost a year ago. I updated my HTML editor demo project for iPadOS 26 and now I can't even compile it because Apple has yet to ship the version 26 SDK. And there's really nothing any third party can do to fix Swift Playgrounds to make it actually usable again. [0] Strictly speaking, Apple's first internal demos of capacitive touch were for a tablet project specifically to spite Windows XP tablets. Although by the time they were writing actual shipping code it was intended for iPhone and iPad came later. | |
| ▲ | eurekin 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I played once with hosting a VSCode server on a raspberry pi for general development and it was actually quite powerful, when used from an iPad. Just not strictly for Swift unfortunately | | |
| ▲ | ajcp 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm hosting a VSCode server with Termux/Ubuntu container on my old Pixel 6a and I cannot overstate how awesome it is for just a fun dev setup, especially with a tablet. Easy to nuke and start clean too! | |
| ▲ | qn9n 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The ecosystem is fine for non-Apple development. It's just building apps for iOS, macOS, etc. that is impossible on iPad right now past some basic applications. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | H1Supreme 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Seems like a pretty solid deal, if you need everything. I don't know who that person is though. The intersection between Final Cut Pro and Logic users is pretty small, I'd imagine. |
| |
| ▲ | 542458 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | TBF, you can say the same thing for adobe creative cloud - the intersection between After Effects and Indesign users is also effectively nil! But having one simple opex line item for "software I buy for the creative types" is appealing for a lot of orgs. | | |
| ▲ | pier25 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | But the CC subscriptions offers a lot more. Photohsop, Illustrator and After Effects are pretty much industry standards. | | |
| ▲ | srik an hour ago | parent [-] | | Apple really should’ve grabbed Affinity before canva. Would’ve rounded out this suite much better. | | |
| ▲ | pier25 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yeah. The Affinity team with Apple's resources could have made an amazing Adobe CC alternative for Mac users. |
|
| |
| ▲ | doctorpangloss an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes, re: opex. The product is “renewals,” not software really. |
| |
| ▲ | pier25 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm that kind of user but I would rather not use Logic, Final Cut, or PixelMator unless Apple really improves those. On top of that there's also the platform lock-in concern. | |
| ▲ | cush 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Subs like this are great for people who can’t afford the full versions yet |
|
|
| ▲ | ksec 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is Off Topic, but the first thing I notice on that page were those icons for apps with Apple Creator Studio. They look AWEFUL. |
| |
| ▲ | MattRix 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don’t think they look awful, and they’re more interesting and opinionated than most boring icons you see these days. | | |
| ▲ | simjnd 23 minutes ago | parent [-] | | They're definitely awful compared to the icons they're replacing. Losing so much identity and detail. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | al_borland 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Too bad they killed Aperture. |
| |
| ▲ | hbbio 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Now they acquired Photomator with Pixelmator, but it's still an independent subscription... not even included in this bundle. Maybe they just forgot. |
|
|
| ▲ | andsoitis 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Excited to see whether the new Apple boss will lead to software innovation, which has been pretty stagnant the last few years. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/08/technology/apple-ceo-tim-... |
|
| ▲ | dormento 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Wow, RIP the icons I guess :/ |
|
| ▲ | speak_plainly 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This seems like an Apple AI subscription under the guise of a software bundle. It’s a good value for some, especially if you want to use FCP, but seems like a bad value for most users who are expecting more value from their Mac purchase. I wonder if new Macs will offer a three-month trial for this suite, or if the standard apps will be pre-installed and the AI features are unlocked through a subscription. If bundled versions of iWork go away, we may see a renaissance for G Suite. |
| |
| ▲ | TimTheTinker 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sounds plausible. Someone internally likely has AI sales numbers to meet, so creating new subscriptions and adding "AI" to them can help juice AI-related numbers toward that quota. |
|
|
| ▲ | kurishutofu 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| When was the last time Apple made some significant update to its professional desktop apps? |
| |
| ▲ | tarentel 17 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Logic Pro gets regular updates. I believe most of it is AI driven nonsense but they are making changes. Flashback capture was a nice fairly recent addition and surprising this wasn't implemented sooner. There are also regular bug fixes and performance improvements. I can't speak for the other apps. https://support.apple.com/en-afri/109503 | |
| ▲ | joezydeco 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Forget that. TikTokers are the revenue stream now. | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | TikTokers ("influencers" in general) don't do their editing or any part of their "production pipeline" on computers, kids are doing the full thing via smartphones nowadays. Blew my mind initially too, as I always did "serious work" at a computer and never the phone, but seems they're managing it somehow. | | |
| ▲ | no_wizard 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | They often start there, some stay there, some graduate to an iPad, but a a lot of the higher end creators absolutely edit in desktops or laptops (usually MacBooks) My old job dealt with this quite a lot as they were our target market, so I got some up close views of how for example, creators like MrBeast go about their editing (well the employees anyway) Though I did note a lot of creators that do graduate to more robust software basically go from lightweight editor via Canva -> iMovie or equivalent -> professional software e.g. FCPX or Premiere | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 38 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, that matches what I've seen too, bigger productions adopting a more traditional pipeline, while "influencers" or whatever they're called today, kind of stick with the tools they've learned, until they "graduate" as they expand the team and bring in actual professionals. |
|
| |
| ▲ | rvz 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | They use CapCut which is free and on the web and Google Docs. To them what Apple just announced is trash. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | noodlesUK an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think this is a huge mistake at least as far as the office software goes. One of the key advantages to Pages.app and friends is that they are pre-installed and free on MacOS. This will just drive people to M365 and Google Docs. |
| |
| ▲ | zffr an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Pages and other iWork apps will remain free. The premium features are for curated images and templates, and AI assisted document creation. If you don't care for those features, you will not be affected by the change. | |
| ▲ | dagmx an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Good thing they remain free and pre installed. As per the article. |
|
|
| ▲ | arvinsim 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is the one-time purchase versions guaranteed for life? If not, then this would likely go the way of others before where it will eventually be removed. |
| |
|
| ▲ | nxobject 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| When you're not plowing money into putting AI everywhere, it's easier to be cheaper than Adobe I guess... (For what it's worth, the iWorks apps – Pages/Keynote/Numbers are free and bundled with macOS.) |
|
| ▲ | joshstrange 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| In this thread: No one who has even skimmed the article I'll say this loud for the people in the back: YOU CAN STILL BUY IT OUTRIGHT They are still offering one-time purchases, calm down. |
| |
|
| ▲ | kace91 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don’t get why they think “professional” is a generic tier. If I’m a music producer, what’s the value of being given a digital art drawing program? If I’m an illustrator, why do I need a cinema post production suite? Some people might happen to do both, but overlap is largely accidental, right? The fact that they think of all professions as a bundle is even insulting as it signals the products are mostly toys/hobbyist stuff. |
| |
| ▲ | steve1977 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think that's why they call it "Creator" studio. Creators - in the way the term is usually used today - indeed do use many of these tools. Maybe you produce music, create a video about you producing music and also need an engaging thumbnail for YouTube. In a feature film production, these would certainly be separate roles. But apart from maybe Logic Pro for composers, Apple's tools are not really relevant at those levels of the entertainment business anymore. Post-pro would be Pro Tools for audio, something like Avid Media Composer for editing etc. I think Apple has realized they are not playing on that level anymore and target their marketing to where they are still in the game. That's not necessarily a bad move. | | |
| ▲ | tarentel 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Tons of professionals use logic. Really, you will find money making musicians using any of the major daws. Pro tools might still be the standard for recording studios but that's likely it. |
| |
| ▲ | vehemenz an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Many people that use professional tools are genuinely doing hobbyist stuff. Especially if they haven't already bought their tools outright. But besides, this subscription works with Family Sharing and is only $12, so it looks easy to get your money's worth. | |
| ▲ | acuozzo an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I don’t get why they think “professional” is a generic tier. The target market is prosumer, not true professional. | | |
| ▲ | vehemenz an hour ago | parent [-] | | I don't think there's that much of a distinction. The real difference is that a "true professional" already has the software—purchased at full price by themselves or by their employer—and doesn't need a subscription in the first place. | | |
| ▲ | acuozzo an hour ago | parent [-] | | The biggest distinction, in my experience, is that prosumers tend to be means-focused and professionals tend to be ends-focused, so there's less zealotry and evangelism in professional circles. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Forgeties79 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A lot of people round trip through various softwares to create things. As a film editor I use NLE’s, DAW’s, music production tools, various encoders (like compressor), graphic design tools…I’d say it’s the norm not the exception to need 2-3 specialized pieces of software during projects. | |
| ▲ | jen20 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > If I’m a music producer, what’s the value of being given a digital art drawing program? If I’m an illustrator, why do I need a cinema post production suite Are you talking about Adobe here? |
|
|
| ▲ | me_online 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| apple can pry my one-time final cut pro purchase from my cold, dead hands. |
| |
| ▲ | acomjean 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Many years ago, before Final Cut Pro x my cousin asked me to help inject some video from tapes and keep the time code. In Final Cut Pro. I couldn’t figure it out. So in desperation I read the manual. It was seriously well written and I understood the program, what needed to be done and how to do it. |
|
|
| ▲ | WillAdams 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is anyone finding Freeform useful? I tried it out when it was first announced and found it painfully limited --- did I miss something? Has it gotten better? |
| |
| ▲ | jonpurdy 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I find it useful as a massive canvas for keeping a bunch of stuff in context, visually. And accessible via Mac and iPhone. But it is sorely lacking a major feature: highlight text to add a hyperlink. I end up with full URLs instead of hyperlinked words and it's pretty messy. | |
| ▲ | Toutouxc an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I use it regularly to do rough sketches of objects on my iPad to model in CAD later on the computer. It doesn't feel right for artwork or notes or basically anything else. |
|
|
| ▲ | reactordev 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Apple CC Like Adobe CC I love Logic and all but really? I can’t help but notice Apple in the last decade has kind of been spinning in circles software wise while their hardware division makes breakthroughs with M-series chips. 2026, the year of the Linux Desktop… |
|
| ▲ | samgranieri 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I wondered when Apple was going to do this. Seemed inevitable when Final Cut Pro on the iPad had a subscription, I think. I hope I can still use the non subscription version of Pixelmator pro I bought |
|
| ▲ | felineflock 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That Synth Player and Chord ID seem to be killer features on Logic Pro.
Are they recent additions?
Do they work well? |
|
| ▲ | aosaigh 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It’s odd not to see Photomator in this bundle. Feels even more likely that they’re going to kill it off in place of the regular Photos app. |
|
| ▲ | andsoitis 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Innovation! More seriously, the subscription probably comes out cheaper than buying several (even if not all) of the apps that come in the bundle. |
| |
| ▲ | lysace 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah! They were courageous enough to take the step that Microsoft did with the Office suite (announced 1988, launched 1990) and with Microsoft 365 as subscription in 2011. |
|
|
| ▲ | EagnaIonat 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Are they planning to discontinue Garage band? |
|
| ▲ | brcmthrowaway an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Does anyone use these apps? |
|
| ▲ | cush 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That’s a great deal |
|
| ▲ | cupofjoakim 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That's great if you need everything. If you need one of them, not so much. |
| |
| ▲ | bayindirh 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You can buy the individual tools, if you want. | |
| ▲ | al_borland 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm curious how many people actually use all this stuff themselves. It seems like an extreme niche, and more often than not will have people paying for apps they will never use. | | |
| ▲ | d_runs_far 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Maybe I'm old skool... but for the last 30+ years I've been using a combination of photoshop, illustrator, FCP, after effects (back when it was CoSA...), some audio editing and mixing in quite a bit of code as well. While others on my team specialize in one or two domains, I've managed to keep my skills in many. Back in the day I was considered a 'MultiMedia' creative. I don't even know what to call myself these days. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | NoSalt 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > "come together in a single SUBSCRIPTION" Ummm ... no, thank you. |
|
| ▲ | rado 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Pixelmator Pro is fantastic. I've forgotten about Photoshop for many years. Just buy it. |
|
| ▲ | Kye 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm keeping an eye on Graphite (https://graphite.art/) as something to move to from Affinity's stuff, but it's good there's a new option for people who need more. |
|
| ▲ | tjpnz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Pages, Numbers and Keynote are the first apps I bin whenever I'm setting up a new Mac. Would people actually pay money for them? |
| |
| ▲ | pico303 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Keynote is so much better for presentations that PowerPoint it's not even funny. But if you're not doing presentations, I can understand dumping it. I do like to have Pages because it means I don't have to bother with Word's annoying ribbon interface and Copilot AI when I'm writing...though sounds like that may be changing? | |
| ▲ | void-pointer 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Numbers is brilliant simply because of independent freely-movable tables It looks so much better than the grid enforced by Excel. | |
| ▲ | piersroberts 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'd forgotten Pages and Numbers existed, but Keynote is worth paying for if it means that I don't have to use PowerPoint. | |
| ▲ | nottorp 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I use Pages once a month for an invoice :) Not sure why tbh, my other invoices are done in LibreOffice. | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Would people actually pay money for them? Why would someone need to buy them, they only run on macOS and macOS hardware comes with it by default, doesn't it? | |
| ▲ | insane_dreamer 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I absolutely would. I've used them for years, alongside MS Office on Windows and Libre Office on Linux, and while they lack a few features they're not ones I've ever needed and the UI and ease of use is far superior to Office. Especially Pages is a pleasure to work with compared with Word. | |
| ▲ | troupo 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | They want you to pay money for premium AI features in those apps, which is worse. The apps themselves are fine IMO. |
|
|
| ▲ | throwaway85825 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Another subscription slop? |
|
| ▲ | wildredkraut an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| lol, what a money grab. |
|
| ▲ | Fraaaank 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Alternative title: "Apple slaps subscription model on existing apps" |
| |
| ▲ | jen20 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Except that isn’t an alternative title, unless you want to lie by omission thus being wrong. “Apple offers new option for subscription in addition to existing one-time purchase optinos” might be an alternative though, and reduce the number of cynically inane comments from people that apparently didn’t RTFA before commenting. |
|
|
| ▲ | isoprophlex 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| God fucking damn not you too, Apple. Adobe isn't a role model to emulate. I hate Adobe's practices. The whole world hates Adobe's practices. I want to pay for a thing with my money and then use it without worrying about ongoing costs, the UI changing, features breaking, or shit being shoved down my throat because some seedy PM wants a raise. EDIT: I know you can still buy the software... but for how long? |
| |
|
| ▲ | xd1936 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is this replacing the one-time purchase of these apps on macOS? |
| |
| ▲ | shmoogy 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Doesn't sound like it
> Alternatively, users can also choose to purchase the Mac versions of Final Cut Pro, Pixelmator Pro, Logic Pro, Motion, Compressor, and MainStage individually as a one-time purchase on the Mac App Store.5 | |
| ▲ | artimaeis 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | No, fta: > Alternatively, users can also choose to purchase the Mac versions of Final Cut Pro, Pixelmator Pro, Logic Pro, Motion, Compressor, and MainStage individually as a one-time purchase on the Mac App Store. |
|
|
| ▲ | sirwhinesalot 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| And here's the ruining of Pixelmator Pro everyone was waiting for. I paid one time 20 euros for it (discounted). And I would gladly pay again even full price for a new major version. I don't want yet another subscription. I see that they can still be bought (for now) but I wonder how long that will last. |
| |
| ▲ | bayindirh 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Pixelmator Pro is upgraded a couple of times under Apple's wings, and this thing is not being ruined. You'll still be able to buy it if you want. All apps are still can be bought. It's in the text. Apple surprised me nicely there. | |
| ▲ | joshstrange 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | One-time purchase versions are still available. For Pixelmator Pro it's $49.99 on the App Store | | |
|
|
| ▲ | moolcool 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| How long until the option to buy-once for this software goes away? I am not a fan of this trend. |
| |