| ▲ | anticorporate 4 hours ago | |||||||
It's the problem that the whole industry is facing - the current generation of hardware is sufficient that hardware refreshes will continue to decline, and companies that want to keep milking us for money regularly need to find a new way to do it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | alwillis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> the current generation of hardware is sufficient that hardware refreshes will continue to decline If anything, Apple is refreshing their hardware much faster now compared to the Intel days. There's literally a new MacBook Pro and MacBook Air every year. And of course there are 3-4 new iPhones every year. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | no_wizard 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Sufficient for whom? At my job they’re still refreshing workstations regularly. They buy and churn hardware on a regular basis. Not quite “buying on release week” basis but some % of employees always getting new hardware at max specs in the design org Makes even engineering jealous sometimes | ||||||||
| ▲ | rstupek 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I hate subscriptions as much as the next person but how would you pay for continued development of software? Do you say a person can continue to run version X forever but if they want a new version they pay for it? | ||||||||
| ||||||||