I still miss Aperture. Photos is a far cry still, many years later.

Lightroom never matched Aperture's organizational abilities for libraries with tens of thousands of RAW photos.

I’ve been waiting to see what happens with Photomator, and the fact that it’s not being included in anyway here makes me think it might not survive? Either that, or it’s gonna be heavily integrated into Photos…

▲

herrherrmann an hour ago | parent [-]

I was also surprised to not see Photomator included. Wouldn’t it perfectly complement the lineup? I hadn’t thought of such a pessimistic interpretation, but now I’m worried as well …

	▲	apgwoz 2 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I think Apple killed Aperture primarily because it was confusing to have iPhoto and Aperture with largely overlapping workflows. Aperture had the loupe view, and side by side comparison stuff, saved color grading tools (I think?), sure, but it wasn’t differentiated enough to justify a Pro designation. I think it makes more sense for Photomator features to be absorbed into Photos… and maybe Photos gets some new Pixelmator integrations if you have it, for quick touch ups / enhancement type things. On the other hand, Final Cut / iMovie will exist side by side because it’s truly a basic vs Pro situation. Not a product manager at Apple, of course, but this is what logically seems to make sense.

▲

haunter 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wish there was something like GOG but for old general software

▲

canbus 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Tried Darktable?

	▲	data-ottawa 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		For me it didn't work with Fuji RAW, so I couldn't really use it.

▲

2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]