| ▲ | elzbardico 13 hours ago |
| This is going to be an interesting experiment:
A widely used social network across the world WITHOUT american content. Until now, the closest thing we had like this were national our regional networks like Russia's vk, but Vk was never truly popular outside Russian speaking countries. Now we, for the first time ever, will have the situation where a social network has global reach but without american content. Will it keep being a english first space? Will it survive/thrive? How the content is going to evolve? What does this means in terms of global cultural influence? Will we see internationalized Chinese content dominating it? Will this backfire for the US? |
|
| ▲ | graeme 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Tiktok is actually surprisingly national in how it serves its content. If you're outside the US you don't see most American accounts except the ones that go very viral. Edit: I should clarify. This might mean most content you see is English, if you're interested in English content. However it matters where the video was geographically uploaded from. If you upload a tiktok video and check the stats you'll see most views are from your region or country. Tiktok shows videos locally, then regionally and then finally worldwide if yoo have a big hit. It would be interesting to know what fraction of the English content people see is posted geographically from within America. |
| |
| ▲ | MasterScrat 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This hasn't been my experience, using TikTok from Switzerland, I almost exclusively see English language, with a focus on my interests | | |
| ▲ | pepinator 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Switzerland has just 8 million people, which are divided into two big language groups. And most people speak (or at least understand) English. So, it's natural for the algorithm to converge to content in English. | | |
| ▲ | epolanski 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Lived in Switzerland and this is really not true. What I've learned is that since Switzerland has 3 official languages (German, French and Italian) children and teens at school focus on learning one of the other two regions they are not from. In particular this leads to French and Italian cantons to be moderately fluent in each other's language. Strikingly when I lived in Lausanne, more people knew Italian than English. English was really not on their radar (plus, add that francophones are kind of elitist when it comes to languages and don't really like to consume content that is not in french). In German speaking Switzerland proficiency in English was still subpar from most of the rest of Europe when walking in a shop or going to a restaurant. | | |
| ▲ | smitty1110 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > What I've learned is that since Switzerland has 3 official languages Everyone always forgets Romansh... | |
| ▲ | secstate 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not to derail, but when I was in Switzerland, I found the German Swiss to be far more elitarian about NOT learning French, than the other way around. And French Swiss being a minority, they kinda got treated as other or less-than in the bulk of Switzerland. But all German Swiss are at least willing to try English, while the French Swiss tend to avoid English, so maybe that's where the vibe comes from? | | |
| ▲ | oblio 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | For both you and OP, first of you, thank you for "elitarian", but even after reading the definition, I still think you both meant "elitist". And even though I probably tend to agree with both of you, it's kinda funny to blame French or German speakers about being elitist against English speakers, of which native speakers are notoriously monolingual :-) | | |
| ▲ | epolanski 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't blame anyone, I'm Italian and I'm fluent in French, English and Polish besides Italian. I'm just saying that in the French part of Switzerland English wasn't a given among any generation and it neither was common in the German/Italian parts too if you exclude the expats. And yes, francophone tend to be very elitist about consuming exclusively french content, regardless of them being from France, Switzerland or Belgium. | | |
| ▲ | anonyme-honteux 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | "Using your mother tongue is elitist" is bullshit on an epic scale. It's litteraly your mother tongue man, everyone outside of the elite has a mother, and therefore a mother tongue, it's not expansive, it's your basic birth right. Why don't people consume audio/video in a foreign language ? I'm a polyglot myself, so I enjoy that very much, but the simple truth is that most people don't invest the time for becoming fluent in other languages in countries with a "big" language. Works for France, the US, the UK, Spain, Mexico, Japan or China. Why ? Pretty obvious. Become fluent in a foreign language is a huge effort. Making that effort really only works if you either WANT to do it or if you NEED to do it. The WANT factor is the same everywhere but the NEED to learn a language is way lower if your mother tongue is in the top 5 - or top 10 languages of the world. The only thing that is specific to French is that French & English have this weird shared history that makes the written langauges very similar and the oral languages very different. So a frequent compromise for french speakers is to become fluent enough at reading/writing, but quite bad at hearing/speaking. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | sschueller 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Switzerland has 4 official languages and English is not one of them. |
| |
| ▲ | elliotec 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is simply not true. Even standard German is a second language in Switzerland. I’m Swiss. | |
| ▲ | Pooge 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > And most people speak (or at least understand) English. This is wrong. In cities where there's a lot of tourism, they might understand. Most Swiss people only speak their local languages (German or French). As for those living in Ticino, they tend to be better polyglots. | | |
| ▲ | Lukas_Skywalker 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That doesn‘t match my experience. About 40% of all Swiss inhabitants speak English at least once a week [1]. Anecdotally, I can't think of a single acquaintance younger than 50 years old that doesn't speak fluently. Everyone in Switzerland learns English at school for at least five years. Most even for seven years. Some of my German speaking friends even talk in English to French speaking people, even when both have learned the other‘s respective language at school. [1]: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/bevoelkerun... | | |
| ▲ | Pooge 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Everyone in Switzerland learns English at school for at least five years. Most even for seven years. We learn the other's respective language for 7 years, too. Yet, as you pointed out, people speak in English because there is no willingness to learn and apply the other's language. Some of my friends speak English fluently, but I have a very hard bias as I work in IT. My whole family doesn't speak any language other than French. Most of the people I've been to school with don't come close to speaking English casually. None would watch an English content creator. Due to the shared heritage between the English and German languages, perhaps it's different in the German-speaking region. If you ask someone slightly complicated English questions, they might not be completely lost - after all, some words share the same etymology. But Switzerland is absolutely not an English-speaking country at all. | | |
| ▲ | Lukas_Skywalker 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | No, I wouldn't say it's an English-speaking country either. No one talks in English to their peers that are from the same language region. But yes, I can mostly speak of the German-speaking part. People generally have little problems switching to English, and are used to speaking as well. | | |
| ▲ | Pooge 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Would you say this is also true of Swiss living in more rural areas? And among older people, too? | | |
| ▲ | Lukas_Skywalker 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is just a feeling, and I am still speaking for the German part only, but I think age matters less than urban/rural. Many older people I know have no problems communicating in English when they‘re abroad. Would be interesting to have the BFS statistics split by age group and region as well… |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | seanmcdirmid 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I met plenty of people in Lausanne who didn't speak English, or at least didn't want to speak English (it is hard to tell, and anyways, it doesn't really matter). I visited Montreal shortly after my 2 year stay in Lausanne ended and I was surprised on how multi-lingual people were there. | | |
| ▲ | tharkun__ an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Montreal is not representative of Quebec in general. Montreal itself is very multilingual and anglophone depending on what specific part you're in. In the very touristy parts of Montreal you won't even notice French "requirements". Leave the island of Montreal towards the rest of Quebec (i.e. not towards Ontario) and you will find less and less people willing or able to speak English very very quickly. Until they think you're a tourist. If they hear you speak another language than English and you seem like you're a tourist, then almost every Quebecer will try his best to speak English even if it means using hand and feet to communicate. But if they think even for a second that you're actually Canadian, then outside Montreal and even in some parts of Montreal you will be met with the full force of Quebecois pride and nationalism and you better speak French to them. | | |
| ▲ | seanmcdirmid an hour ago | parent [-] | | Lausanne is also not representative of Switzerland and is pretty touristy, although I guess Geneva is even more so. | | |
| ▲ | WillPostForFood 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Y'all are both claiming that the major cities in their region are not representative because they are touristy? That's going to apply to most major cities. Tokyo not representative of Japan, New York not representative of USA, Dublin not representative of Ireland, etc.. But they are. |
|
| |
| ▲ | lcouturi 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well, it makes sense. Canada still has a significant English-speaking majority. Even if Québec in isolation has a French-speaking majority, there's a very large incentive for French-speaking citizens to learn English because their province is surrounded by primarily Anglophone regions. There are also other factors at play. Montréal has a fairly large community of native English speakers and receives a lot of tourism from Anglophone Canada and the United States due to its status as the largest city in Québec (and second largest in Canada). It also gets a lot of immigrants, many of which are (at least initially) more proficient in English than in French. I can't say I'm entirely familiar with the situation in Switzerland, but as far as I know the country has four official languages, none of which are English. It also doesn't border any English-speaking countries. It seems English is mostly used as a lingua franca for communication between citizens who don't otherwise share a language rather than due to the direct presence of native Anglophones. Also, Romansh aside, all national languages of Switzerland (French, German and Italian) are spoken in areas that directly border a country where that language is the national language (France, Italy, Germany/Austria). With Switzerland being in the Schengen Area, its linguistic regions may be considered to be part of a much larger individual linguistic communities, which I feel may also diminish the need to learn other languages. | | |
| ▲ | seanmcdirmid 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I can't say I'm entirely familiar with the situation in Switzerland, but as far as I know the country has four official languages, none of which are English. The language of French Switzerland is French. You'll never hear German, Italian, or Romansch. If you only spoke German and not French or English, you really couldn't live there very effectively (only places like Bern or Basel are truly multi-lingual), yes you'll get your official docs in German but then what? I assume the same is true in German speaking Switzerland, and I have no idea about Italian Switzerland. If a Swiss German and Swiss French met for coffee, what language do you think they would wind up speaking? Perhaps English if neither had comfortable fluency in the other language. Not to take away from your point, but English can get you really far in this world. |
|
| |
| ▲ | paulg2222 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It is not German, but Alemannic. | | |
| ▲ | Pooge 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm sorry if this sounds offensive or derogatory. But as a Swiss person, I've never heard anyone call it "Alemannic". Whether it be foreigners, Swiss-French speakers or Swiss-German speakers, everyone called it "German". | | |
| ▲ | computerthings 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_German > Swiss German (Standard German: Schweizerdeutsch, Alemannic German: Schwiizerdütsch, Schwyzerdütsch, Schwiizertüütsch, Schwizertitsch Mundart, and others; Romansh: Svizzers Tudestg) is any of the Alemannic dialects spoken in the German-speaking part of Switzerland, and in some Alpine communities in Northern Italy bordering Switzerland. All Swiss-German is an Alemannic dialect, not all Alemannic dialects are Swiss-German, is how I'd interpret that. | |
| ▲ | slater 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Probably making a distinction between high german and swiss german. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alemannic_German |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | crucialfelix 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It depends what you interact with. I tried it fresh today and it quickly decided I'm a Berliner muslim who likes Nigerian food because I lingered for a minute on something. That interest graph is very fast and volatile. | |
| ▲ | sushid 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Uhh... that's kind of how these algorithms work. I presume you interact (i.e. don't scroll past) with a lot of the English posts. It's going to index on that and show you more English content. When I'm abroad, I might see a few posts in their native language but the algorithm will revert to showing English posts about the city/country once it realizes I'm not really jiving with Portuguese posts, for example. | |
| ▲ | 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | financypants 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | i mean, we all have the algorithm tailored to what we want to see, so the parent comment here is kind of a moot point, right? | | |
| ▲ | datavirtue 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I joined TikTok and was immediately barraged with naked young girls. Haven't been back since. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Kkoala 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | My experience is that it serves you the content that you spent time watching and engaging with. And it's quite easy to steer it towards a certain topic if you want to | |
| ▲ | spandrew 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I believe the algo is somewhat timezone based, too. Very common for ppl to be served Chinese or asian influencer content after 12pm (EST). So common, in fact, most of the western users begin posting "whelp, time to go to bed!" The majority of the content feels regional, though. | | |
| ▲ | 0xffff2 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I've never used tiktok... Do you mean 12AM (midnight)? Or are people commonly in the habit of mid-afternoon naps? | |
| ▲ | IncRnd 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | 12PM is Noon. Did you mean Midnight? |
| |
| ▲ | 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | ehsankia 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Canada and potentially the UK are gonna be having the biggest shock I guess. Potentially Australia too? | | | |
| ▲ | fouronnes3 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The question is, was this a conscious human design decision or did the algorithm learn to do that by itself? | | |
| ▲ | numpad0 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I would believe if someone said it was completely organic. It's just how Internet is and how social graphs build up. The typical American notion that the Internet is nearly 100% dominated by American English socio-cultural platform and English is the foundational language of the world's all cognitive processing is just an annoying megalomaniac hallucination. English is used as a lot as a fallback language for inter-cultural exchanges. In that sense it's kind of dominating, but that's it. Intra-cultural communications happens in local languages, and even if that preferred language happened to be one of en-* locales, that only means everyone is functionally bilingual, and it doesn't mean cultural informational borders don't exist. Data still only goes through bridging connections. | |
| ▲ | jrflowers 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Considering the algorithm did not crawl out of the primordial ooze unbidden by man I am going to guess the former. | | |
| ▲ | markeroon 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | The recommendation engine is at least partially learned so it’s fairly likely that it’s the latter |
| |
| ▲ | mrbungie 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The algo learned "by itself", but humans set a objetive to optimize and then implemented it to do so as well as it they could. So essentially both I guess? | | |
| ▲ | numpad0 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | It tends to get people annoyed if you don't. Facebook user distribution is like 12% Indian and 6% American. Twitter is(was) 34% English and 16% Japanese. Bluesky was at one point 43% Japanese. If your feed ISN'T filled with Hindi, Chinese, Spanish, Japanese and so on, with only one in five or less made in English sent from US, your feed is tampered with. But otherwise that social media would be genuinely less useful. Mastodon only had the raw feed and that drove European network operators insane, so much so that they effectively GFW'd itself. |
| |
| ▲ | svnt 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Why is that the question? If it learned to do it by itself it still is being allowed to do it by humans. | |
| ▲ | moralestapia 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You don't deserve the downvotes from the immature peeps around here. Your question is 100% valid. I would lean for the latter, the simple explanation may be that people just prefer local content. |
| |
| ▲ | runjake 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As an American in the US, I get quite a bit of foreign and foreign language content under For You. This is the inverse to the situation you describe but it makes me doubtful that non-US don't see a lot of American content. | | |
| ▲ | graeme 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | The algo bends to your interests. But it's trivial to test the default reach if you ever post a video. They show stats for viewer location. You can even find guides by people trying to make their phone seem american so they can reach us audiences. |
| |
| ▲ | realusername 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't think it does, I don't see any single content from my country's language. Tiktok is very good at adapting the content to you. | |
| ▲ | the_clarence 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If its like Reels (I dont use tiktok) as soon as you are in France its only French content. Same for youtube. | | |
| ▲ | qingcharles 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I actually had to check if TikTok was subject to the French protection laws on localized media quotas. I see it applies to Netflix et al, but not directly to TikTok. |
| |
| ▲ | dayjah 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Source? My anecdotal evidence of watching TikTok usage on others’ phones while riding subway systems in Paris suggest there’s plenty of English-language content out there. | | |
| ▲ | permo-w 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | in Morocco most of the adults speak French and Arabic, so when they need to speak to an Englisher they get some kids over to help because they all speak English from TikTok | | |
| |
| ▲ | blackeyeblitzar 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | TikTok is surprisingly national at the surface level, but it is all coordinated back with the parent China based entities (ByteDance, Douyin, and the CCP), so that even if it is national, it upholds China’s national interests. See the story at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42739855 for more details. But basically, TikTok executives had to agree to let ByteDance monitor their personal devices, swear oaths to uphold various goals of the CCP (“national unity” “socialism” etc), report to both a US-based manager and a China-based manager, uphold the CCP’s moderation/censorship scheme, and so on. It is REALLY aggressive and unethical, but also reveals how subtly manipulative the entire system of TikTok is. | | |
| ▲ | gunian 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Do you think it would be possible to show this programmatically? As in scrape n posts from TikTok and Reels and show the first displays CCP tendencies? Or is this like a general US freedom China dictator logic | | |
| ▲ | insane_dreamer 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | It actually doesn't matter whether TT has done it already or not. What matters is that it has the __capability__ of doing it, in ways that would be difficult to detect, when it proves expedient to do so. | | |
| ▲ | markdown 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yup, but of course more than one person has to agree for this to actually happen. Which is not the case for other apps, like Twitter/X. If Musk wants to remove a government, he has only to promote "free speech" and let falsehoods and misinformation dominate his platform. | | |
| ▲ | gunian 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | geopolitics aside could a turing machine identify misinformation / programatically check whether something is true or not? because even among humans there is no agreement | | |
| ▲ | markdown 26 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > even among humans there is no agreement This is just not true. There are objective facts eg. the earth is round. We can all agree on this, and any information to the contrary should be banned. The majority of us agree that racism is bad for society. Racist content should be banned. Yes there are always going to be humans who think the earth is flat or has a core of cheese, but these people can be relegated to the fringes of society. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | ghfhghg 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Your link doesn't appear to work | | | |
| ▲ | lupire 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You are conflating strong Chinese Communist control of the business with how the content behaves. TikTok is full of content that would put a Chinese person in prison. See this 2019 article outlining Chinese Communist moderation policies that (obviously) were attached to the app when TikTok was new, but were removed for non-Chinese user communities. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/sep/25/revealed-... |
|
|
|
| ▲ | hintymad 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > This is going to be an interesting experiment: A widely used social network across the world WITHOUT american content. China has had such social networks for a long time. Their Weibo and Xiaohongshu are two prominent examples. Weibo started as a copycat of Twitter, but then beats Twitter hands-down with faster iterations, better features, and more vibrant user engagement despite the gross censorship imposed by the government. My guess is that TT can still thrive without American content, as long as other governments do not interfere as the US did. A potential threat to TT is that the US still has the best consumer market, so creators may still flock to a credible TT-alternative for better monetization, thus snatching away TT's current user base in other countries. |
| |
| ▲ | myrloc 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Are Weibo and Xiaohongshu used widely outside of China? Given the names alone I'd imagine their adoption is fairly limited to China. | | |
| ▲ | bryanlarsen 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Xiaohongshu is generally known as RedNote outside of China. | | |
| ▲ | logancbrown 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | To directly answer the question, Rednote is not generally used outside China, and the point about these apps being representative of "global" social media apps is false. | | |
| ▲ | dluan 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Xiaohongshu is used by a lot of huaqiao outside of China. It has a sizeable overseas userbase, but it also has 300M total users. | | | |
| ▲ | bryanlarsen 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | RedNote was #1 on the App Store download list for a couple of days. https://www.vice.com/en/article/chinese-app-rednote-hits-1-i... | | |
| ▲ | xmprt 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | So was this app at one point in time: https://www.theverge.com/2020/1/9/21058399/david-dobrik-disp... It's called Dispo. You probably haven't heard of it because it became almost irrelevant a few weeks after launch. #1 on the app store doesn't mean a whole lot. | | |
| ▲ | MisoRamen 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | RedNote is a bit different: it has been wildly popular in China for a number of years, and the Chinese community has been using it overseas already. It may not retain all the new users, but it is not going to become irrelevant. | | |
| ▲ | xmprt 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I agree. But I'm just saying that #1 on the app store doesn't preclude something from being a fad and my guess is that in 1 month's time, no one is going to be talking about RedNote outside of Chinese communities. |
|
| |
| ▲ | drakythe 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That’s an extremely recent development caused by the TT shutdown looming. | |
| ▲ | toomanyrichies 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How many of those downloads originated in China? Genuine question, I read the article and it doesn't say. Apple's App Store is available in China, and China's population alone could be skewing those numbers. | | |
| ▲ | SXX 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | App store top apps are per-region. And China one likely even running on completely different infrastructure because CCP. |
| |
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes it's called a meme and it won't last. | |
| ▲ | 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | pantalaimon 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It received some popularity among TikTok refugees from the US and subsequently also from around the world by users who got curios about what the fuzz was all about. |
| |
| ▲ | ameister14 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Which is honestly weird. It's Little Red Book, not Red Note, in reference to Mao's little red book. | | |
| ▲ | lupire 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | "Little Red Book" doesn't resonate with people outside China |
|
| |
| ▲ | mytailorisrich 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Xiaohingshu is widely used outside China... by Chinese. My experience in the UK is that the whole Chinese community is on it for anything (discussions, classifieds...) instead of Facebook, Insta, etc. | | | |
| ▲ | hintymad 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, if "widely used" means that multiple nations and cultures use the service, then they are not widely used. |
| |
| ▲ | gklitz 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > creators may still flock to a credible TT-alternative for better monetization Seems people are already mass migrating to Rednote. I’m not sure how that plays out though. | | |
| ▲ | throwthrowrow 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think it will be a temporary phenomenon. Tiktok people arrived on RedNote last week and were jaw-droppingly amazed at videos of flashy modern Chinese cities, natural wonders (Guilin mountains), beautifully dressed young men and women, tasty food, Luigi fandom, and cute cats. For many it was a revelation that the US government/media complex has been systematically lying to them about China. They are arriving at an acceptance that the US is a shabby declining empire dominated by a corrupt elite and heartless broligarchs. Always a good thing to bump up against reality, imho. However I think that the US-based population of Tiktok refugees will subside once the novelty effect has worn off. Probably shrink by half in a month. Hopefully there will remain a positive lingering effect. | | |
| ▲ | paulddraper 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Good to meet you fellow American. | |
| ▲ | cscurmudgeon 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > many it was a revelation that the US government/media complex has been systematically lying to them about China. The rational and data-based take is that the CCP censors negative content about China on Red Book. See [1], [2] and [3] from David Zhang, and you can verify this on your own. [1] https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LKR8-AxFvJY
[2] https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4tMxW77lFBA
[3] https://www.youtube.com/shorts/N65jFr061_o
If China is so developed, why does it fight for developing nation status?https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202305/1290627.shtml > They are arriving at an acceptance that the US is a shabby declining empire dominated by a corrupt elite and heartless broligarchs. Always a good thing to bump up against reality, imho. Try making this comment about China in Red Book and see how long it lasts. Can you post a video about use of gutter oil in China on Red Book? You can post a video about drug use in SF on Twitter and not get banned. | | |
| ▲ | _tik_ 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | You should provide more reliable and trusted sources. The link you shared here originates from Falun Gong, a cult. |
|
| |
| ▲ | hintymad 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, me neither. Some analysis said the absolute number is large but the percentage is still small. And the migration is more about protesting. Xiaohongshu will need to come up with better monetization schemes too. |
| |
| ▲ | deepsun 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Re. copycats -- VK was also a blatant copycat of Facebook, down to copy-pasted CSS styles. | | |
| ▲ | kgeist 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | The very first versions, IIRC. Now they have diverged completely. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Will we see internationalized Chinese content dominating it? This is a weird fantasy, but it brings up an interesting point. The complete lack of Chinese influence on global pop culture. Especially when compared to Japan or Korea, countries with a fraction of the population but many, many times the influence. I wish the CCP didn't wall off their citizens from the rest of the world in the name of protecting their own power. Think of the creativity we are all losing out on. |
| |
| ▲ | parsimo2010 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > The complete lack of Chinese influence on global pop culture The CCP has tried to get their culture out there, it just has not been successful at the visually obvious scale of Japan or Korea. But their culture is definitely getting out there, and I think we often don't spot the Chinese influence on something unless some journalist finds out and writes an article about it. Some of their influence is leveraged in business deals, with several movies being altered by the demand of the CCP, and these changes persisting in worldwide releases, not just the Chinese-released version of the movies. Some of their influence is leveraged in video games- Genshin Impact is a famously successful Chinese game. There are some competitive Chinese teams in various pockets of e-sports too. Tencent also owns several video game developers, and occasionally uses their influence to change parts of a game to please the CCP. There is a Chinese animation industry (print and video), and occasionally they get a worldwide success. I remember being surprised when I found out that "The Daily Life of the Immortal King" was Chinese- you can tell it isn't Japanese but lots of people guess that it is Korean. | | |
| ▲ | proudeu 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I became so interested in ancient Chinese mythology after playing black myth wukong. Also my cousin is watching cDramas all the time and she intends to marry Chinese guy… So I think the soft power is there already, whether we like it or not. but I think it’s good to have competing content instead of being fed whatever powers that be think is good fur us | | |
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I heard that game is great! This discussion reminds me of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCCRuUlJ_nA It basically asks "Why can't China make a movie like this?" Kung Fu Panda was a love letter to Chinese culture, and it connected with people worldwide. I think it comes down to government censorship. Art is expression and unapproved expression is seen as a threat to a dictatorship. It makes me sad to think of all the Chinese art we have missed out on because of the insecurity of a government. |
| |
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Government can't create culture and art anymore than a tech company can. They can only allow it to grow and spread, or block it. | | |
| ▲ | throwthrowrow 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Mostly true but the exception is K-Pop, which as I understand was the creation of a project by the South eKorean government. There was a severe financial crisis in the late 1990s where the country almost went bankrupt. Desperately seeking sources of revenue, the government funded K-Pop groups which eventually become a global phenomenon (BTS et al). At least that is what some Koreans have told me. | | |
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Funding is one thing, but they didn't create any of it. The people did. A small but important distinction imho. | |
| ▲ | sungho_ an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I am Korean, and what you are saying is a lie created by anti-Korean people in Japan. Do you really think it makes sense for a government experiencing an economic crisis to desperately seek revenue sources and hope to overcome the crisis by funding a cultural industry that hasn't even succeeded yet? | | |
| ▲ | djtango a few seconds ago | parent [-] | | I've always wondered about this, turns out there's a wikipedia entry for it > To protect the South Korean culture industry, the South Korean Ministry of Culture received a substantial budget increase, allowing for the creation of hundreds of culture industry departments in universities nationwide.[21] It has justified its financial support for Hallyu, estimated to be worth US$83.2 billion in 2012, by linking it to South Korea's export-driven economy.[22] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Wave |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | djtango 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As someone who wants to learn Chinese, I think about it all the time. Watching Chinese shows just isn't as fun for whatever reason. I was telling my wife the other day I have met so many people who credit Friends for why they can speak English. That's soft power right there. I've had to resort to watching anime on Netflix with Chinese dubs - anime is good because people actually talk slower and usually use simple language. When I watched Three Body (Chinese version) the dialogue was impenetrable lol | | |
| ▲ | wordofx 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Taiwanese shows are better if you want to learn Chinese. They speak clearly and don’t speak fast like China shows. | | |
| ▲ | djtango 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Thanks I'll take a look. It will be funny if I end up with a Taiwanese accent around my Dongbei in laws but I've spent enough time in china to remember the mainland accent tbh |
| |
| ▲ | BlueTemplar 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Friends is great, but still pretty advanced as English learning goes, with fast speech, and lots of slang and US/90s specific references. | | |
| ▲ | djtango 18 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I guess so but it also has slower lines too especially for comedic delivery. The cultural references are good (now dated because Friends is 20-30 years old) because after learning a language, cultural references are next when it comes to fully being able to converse |
|
| |
| ▲ | glenstein 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For better or worse, I think CCP has long been on the backfoot in international propaganda just because what passes for persuasive narratives in authoritarian contexts falls flat to global audiences fluent in western entertainment and media culture. Of course they have modernized, but most actual influence obtained thus fair (e.g. international olympic committees covering up investigations, stopping the NBA from venturing criticisms) has come from projection of soft power rather than being on the cultural cutting edge. | |
| ▲ | swatcoder 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What do you mean by "global pop culture" here? I've never considered there to be one, although I'm open to the idea. It's easy for me to recognize an Ameican pop culture or an Anglo pop culture, and the favor each show for certain imports over others, but those don't seem nearly so universal as your usage of "global pop culture" suggests. Latin, Arabic, Russian, Chinese, French, Indian/South Asian, etc each represent huge "pop culture" markets of their own but also each have their own import biases. | | |
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > What do you mean by "global pop culture" here? Encountering a Chinese song playing a cafe in Latin America. A popular movie with global appeal. Or even people being aware of cultural trends. I feel like culturally, China is a bit of a black box. |
| |
| ▲ | matthest 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As a Chinese American, this is the real reason people don't know about China. To be honest, most of the movies/shows China creates sucks. They're Marvel-esque CGI fests with awful storylines. Meanwhile, Japan and Korea are creating awesome media. The whole narrative about the US gov trying to "hide" China isn't really true. There are a ton of viral videos on YouTube about how great China is. And we welcome Chinese immigrants every year. The real problem is that China itself doesn't execute when it comes to soft power. | | |
| ▲ | antifa 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > most of the movies/shows China creates sucks. They're Marvel-esque CGI fests with awful storylines. since we're here, what are some of the least bad modern Sci-fi/Horror movies/TV shows from China? | |
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think this is one of the main reason Japan gets overwhelmed by tourists every year, their culture has so many fans. |
| |
| ▲ | elzbardico 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'd say that in the last two years China has advanced quite a big step with video-games. | |
| ▲ | ec109685 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | “Chinese movies” are popular in Vietnam for example, so not fair to say they have no global reach. | | |
| ▲ | echoangle 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Those two share a border, how does that show global reach? I would be surprised if a country didn’t influence its neighbors in some ways. | | |
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is precisely what i'm talking about. A country of 1.4b with a film industry that gets billions in state subsidies and they best they can do is mild popularity of a few films on their physical borders. Censorship is the enemy of art. |
|
| |
| ▲ | quickthrowman 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The only good Chinese language films were all filmed in Hong Kong, directed by people like Wong Kar-Wai. In the Mood for Love is widely considered one of the greatest films ever made. Chinese cultural (and censor) sensibilities are why big budget US movies are almost universally boring and terrible these days. Authoritarian societies aren’t exactly known for creating good art. | |
| ▲ | petre 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | True that. My wife watched a few Chinese dramas, but they're quite boring compared to k-dramas or japanese shows. I find them annoying and full of propaganda. Only the historical ones are borderline interesting. Also the CCP crackdown on celebrities didn't help. By contrast, there's now a very good k-drama with Lee Min-ho happening in space or the Gyeongseong Creature horror drama with Park Seo-joon. I did see some good Chinese movies, mostly out of Hong Kong. Wong Kar-wai directed a bunch of good ones but they all predate Xi's regime and the takeover of HK. One of my favourite contemporary artists is Ai Weiwei, who has gone missing in 2011 only to finally reappear four years later. I understand he now lives in Portugal. Got his book on my night stand, 1000 Years of Joys and Sorrows. | |
| ▲ | saturn8601 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think you are a bit too premature: China has at least one(usually dozens) competitor for literally everything America has. You just don't hear about everything in the US. Think of any industry and there is probably a Chinese competitor that is trying. Tesla -> BYD Google -> Baidu Starbucks -> Luckin Coffee IMAX -> China Film Giant Screen or maybe POLYMAX Finally Disney -> Possibly Beijing Enlight Pictures They released an animated film Ne Zha in 2019 that according to wikipedia was "the highest-grossing animated film in China,[16] the worldwide highest-grossing non-U.S. animated film,[17] and the second worldwide highest-grossing non-English-language film of all time at the time of its release. With a gross of over $725 million,[18] it was that year's fourth-highest-grossing animated film, and China's all time fourth-highest-grossing film.[19]" [1]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ne_Zha_(2019_film) Some great info here [2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2J0pRJSToU Ok I'll admit part of the reason people don't hear about these companies is that they are still too half baked. But look at BYD, they started off producing junk but this Chinese mindset of grinding and rapid iteration has put them to be super successful today. Why couldn't that kind of happen with their Disney competitor? Another thing that might be happening is the literal closing off of the world into two spheres. Western US led and Eastern Chinese led. As we are seeing with BYD, they are taking over all the non western markets(and some western as well) but the US has essentially slammed the door shut on them (they haven't actually but made it impossible to enter with their tariffs). Maybe the Disney competitor will take hold in the non western aligned world? Honestly its a shame they are not open or democratic. The idea of watching or even being part of a rising country that is building their empire is fascinating to watch. Will they collapse due to demographics or these fundamental issues like communism or will they make it? Unfortunately for many people, the only option is to stick with the US and work to keep the ship afloat as there is no place for them in China. | | |
| ▲ | edm0nd 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Chinese nation state hacking groups also literally break into American Fortune 500 companies and US aerospace/defense companies to steal R&D and tech to then use themselves + give to private Chinese industries. That sure does help them a ton when they dont have to do any research and can just steal and copy instead. | | |
| ▲ | saturn8601 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Thats true...you can only go so far with that though and thats probably why many of their industries haven't really met the par yet. But at the same time they have eclipsed the west in certain industries such as commercial nuclear. That mentality is there in their industries that havent met the par yet and that was a major point I was making in my previous comment. As far as I understand, they originally licensed the AP1000 but expanded upon the design enough that they have ownership over the new design and they use that now. [1]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_China#Reactor... We also see it in BYD. The Seagull is a symphony of cost efficiency and vertical integration that western companies are now studying. [2]: https://youtu.be/izvdO-zdlKg?t=29 | |
| ▲ | BlueTemplar 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It might help, but the Soviet Union did something like that too, and look at what became of it. |
|
| |
| ▲ | datavirtue 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm resentful for not having BYD here to offer affordable vehicles. The vast numbers of people who are now boxed out of the middle class could desperately use the help of a vehicle that doesn't cost them $700 a month. | |
| ▲ | peoplefromibiza 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [dead] | |
| ▲ | dv_dt 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Or perhaps you haven't encountered Chinese content because of soft suppression of the content from within the US bubble | | |
| ▲ | n144q 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Do you have any concrete examples of Chinese culture elements as popular as anime that is "supressed" in the US? | | | |
| ▲ | matthest 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't buy this narrative, even as a Chinese American. There are a ton of viral videos on YouTube about people travelling the most beautiful parts of China. Free for everyone to consume. Chinese movies/shows just kind of suck, especially compared to the quality of Kdramas and anime. | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | raincole 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > This is going to be an interesting experiment: A widely used social network across the world WITHOUT american content. For whom? UK users? TikTok users who use the Chinese version are not consuming content from US creators. They won't notice this ban at all. |
| |
| ▲ | zapzupnz 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > For who? UK users? Literally every TikTok user from around the world? There's more than just the US, UK, and China, y'know. | | |
| ▲ | nfw2 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think they meant that because content is siloed already by language barriers, the only ecosystem that would be affected by the removal of US users is the English-speaking subsystem. That said, the English-speaking world clearly extends well beyond the US and English commonwealth countries nowadays. Also, a lot of videos don't have any dialogue and can also cross the language barrier. | |
| ▲ | Retric 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | 2/3 of the global population doesn’t speak English. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | TikTok content is mostly visual. My YouTube shorts are frequently foreign language with AI subtitles. Also, TikTok is banned in India and—ironically—China [1]. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_TikTok | | |
| ▲ | Retric 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | A valid point, but I doubt people are going to notice if “clips of people slipping on ice” suddenly exclude Americans post 2024. | | |
| ▲ | yamazakiwi 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | There will be a small category of content that will disappear. For instance, my fyp was full of Chinese fashion content (by choice) so I'm sure there are other categories of content that non-Americans consume that are American. Whether it's Movies or Music or whatever. |
|
| |
| ▲ | gkbrk 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | English is literally the most commonly spoken language in the world. No language in the world will fit your criteria if you want more than two thirds of the global population to speak it. | | |
| ▲ | Retric 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why would that criteria matter when what we are discussing is the impact when you remove a country’s creators from a platform? | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Why would that criteria matter when what we are discussing is the impact when you remove a country’s creators from a platform? That country’s creators belong to the largest native-speaking bloc of the most-commonly spoken language (native or not) in the world. | | |
| ▲ | Retric 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | Actual numbers of English speakers already captured that info. Saying there’s no other language that comes close doesn’t change anything here. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | lelanthran 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That doesn't sound accurate. Did you mean as a first language? | | |
| ▲ | coltonweaver 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | A quick search seems to confirm this. A few sites list the number to be around ~1.3 billion people who speak English at all, with around ~360-380 million being native speakers. For example: https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/how-many-people-speak-eng.... | |
| ▲ | herval 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | https://www.statista.com/statistics/266808/the-most-spoken-l... | |
| ▲ | Retric 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > first language? 1/3 of the global population is at all, there’s only 380 million native English speakers. US, UK, Canada, Australia is where you find the bulk of native speakers. In say Germany or whatever they may become fluent but it’s relatively rare for German parents to be speaking English to each other in casual conversation next to an infant’s crib. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | > there’s only 380 million native English speakers Not how a lingua franca works. There are 1.5 to 2 billion English speakers [1]. By far the largest number of people to speak a single language. Most of them are in America [2]. (If you count English learners, No. 2 is China [3].) [1] https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/english-today/articl... [2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/English-speaking_world [3] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236986651_The_stati... | | |
| ▲ | ANewFormation 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | CIA gives 18.8%, so about 1.5 billion. [1] But this number is dubious as it's largely from self response. Here [2] is a list by country. So 25% of Thais, 50% of Ukrainians, 50% of Poles, and so on "speak English." In the sense of being able to say hello, thank you, and introduce themselves that is probably true. But "my name is Bob" maketh not a common tongue. If we narrowed it down to the percent of people that could hold a basic conversation, the number would plummet precipitously, likely leaving Mandarin at the top. [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_languages... [2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_English-s... | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | > the number would plummet precipitously, likely leaving Mandarin at the top 70% of Chinese speak Mandarin as a first language [1]. > the sense of being able to say hello, thank you, and introduce themselves that is probably true This is English learners. If you count English learners, a third of Chinese speak English and a majority of the internet-connected world. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_China |
| |
| ▲ | Retric 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Being fluent is a different question, you can dream in English without it being your native language. first language = A first language (L1), native language, native tongue, or mother tongue is the first language a person has been exposed to from birth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_language | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, we understand what a first language is. You should understand why that’s irrelevant to this discussion. | | |
| ▲ | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | You know, they weren't the one to bring it up and their point seems to have consistently been that the majority of the global population does not speak English. | | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | shortrounddev2 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | As their first language, perhaps | | |
| ▲ | InsideOutSanta 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There are only about 400 million native English speakers. You can't just add up the population of English speaking countries, because that excludes immigrants living in these countries, and people born there who did not learn English as their first language. As for people who learned it later, even in Europe, only about 40% self-identify as being able to speak English. If you visit places like China or Indonesia, you'll soon notice that very few people know more than a few basic words in English once you leave the tourist areas. | | |
| ▲ | whoistraitor 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | IMO first-or-not is moot. It’s estimated that around one billion people speak English to a reasonably fluent level. Included in that is many of the commonwealth countries in which English often holds second spot as a lingua franca (eg. India). It’s an incredibly global language. | | | |
| ▲ | permo-w 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | this is horseshit. Canada, the US and the UK alone have - minimum - 400 million. Australia has 25 million, Ireland 5, New Zealand 5, then there's the Anglophone African nations, plus a lot of the Carribbean. Nigeria on its own likely has 100 million native speakers of English | | |
| ▲ | InsideOutSanta 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | As I've said, you can't just sum up populations. About 20% of the US population are immigrants. A lot of them won't speak English as their native language. Only about 60 million Nigerians speak English. Hausa is the most commonly spoken native language. Just because English is the official language doesn't mean that it's people's native language. I'm not just making stuff up. The 400 million number is from The Ethnologue, a source which linguists generally consider as reliable. | | |
| ▲ | permo-w 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'd like to see their working for that number. Let's say we subtract 20% from Canada + the UK + the US, we get ~320 million. add Nigeria and Uganda and you have easily 400 million. That's without Australia, Ireland, New Zealand or any of the African or Caribbean countries. | | |
| ▲ | Retric 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > You have easily 400 million No you don’t: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_Nigeria ~60 million people in Nigeria speak English out of 230 million people, but that 60 million isn’t almost exclusively native speakers. | |
| ▲ | InsideOutSanta 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | There aren't that many native English speakers in Nigeria and Uganda. To me, it looks like your back-of-the-envelope calculation will come pretty close to 400 million. |
|
| |
| ▲ | bilbo0s 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Have you been to Nigeria? Not all Nigerians can speak English. But there are a lot who can. It honestly felt about 50/50 to me. And I see some other commenters saying that 60 million Nigerians have some ability to speak it. (But you need to think of that like if I was to say 60 million Americans have some ability to speak Spanish.) However, even for those with some facility with English,I don't know that I'd classify it as their native language. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Retric 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That’s at all, there are only ~380 million native English speakers. Of that 1/3 (of the global population) a significant percentage have extremely limited skills, though the threshold is above knowing a few random words. | | |
| ▲ | adriancr 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Including people who speak English as a second language, estimates of the total number of Anglophones vary from 1.5 billion to 2 billion wikipedia. You are a bit off... As for native you have US+UK+Canada+Australia+NZ+Ireland. So more then your 380M. | | |
| ▲ | Retric 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | ~47 million Americans aren’t native English speakers having immigrated from a non English speaking country. | | |
| ▲ | switchbak 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Who cares if they're native English speakers or not, as long as they can converse in the language? | | |
| ▲ | Retric 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | shortrounddev2 who brought the topic up without knowing the numbers. |
| |
| ▲ | adriancr 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Source? | | |
| ▲ | Retric 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_immigration_stat... | | |
| ▲ | adriancr 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | > aren’t native English speakers Where does it state this? Do you assume that all immigrants are non-native english speakers? | | |
| ▲ | Retric 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | By coming from different country their native language (IE what language they heard as infants) more closely resembles that country than America. Note I said 47 million and there are more than 47 million immigrants. There are also some native born Americans to immigrants who also don’t have English as their first language and People born in China whose first language is English, but that’s ever smaller refinements on a specific estimate. | | |
| ▲ | adriancr 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | Retric 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | adriancr 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | You made this statement which is wrong: > ~47 million Americans aren’t native English speakers having immigrated from a non English speaking country. Your link says 46M total which includes native speakers. So it does not state how many non-native speakers. (not that it would matter as most would be proficient english speakers, just pointing out you're exagerating and your numbers are wrong) | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | shortrounddev2 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If they are native English speakers, then how do they have extremely limited skills? | | |
| ▲ | Retric 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I added clarification, but “that 1/3” refers to my prior mention of 1/3 as in 1/3 of the global population. | |
| ▲ | edoceo 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | American education. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | tbeseda 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > TikTok users who use the Chinese version The what now? There are no Chinese nationals using TikTok. It's banned there. Like it's now banned in the US. | | |
| ▲ | jamesgeck0 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | Douyin is TikTok. Before all the drama started, it was the same software powered by most of the same backend servers. | | |
| |
| ▲ | 8note 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | its fantastic for canada | |
| ▲ | mvdtnz 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ah yes, USA, UK and China. The 3 countries that exist. |
|
|
| ▲ | Conscat 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > but Vk was never truly popular outside Russian speaking countries. Can't really disagree, but it's my favorite place to pirate fonts. Typing out site:vk.com <thing I want> feels like a real life cheat code. |
|
| ▲ | andsoitis 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > widely used social network across the world WITHOUT american content. As of January 2025, the countries with the most TikTok users are: Indonesia: Has the most active users with 157.6 million United States: 120.5 million Brazil: 105.2 million Mexico: 77.5 million Vietnam: 65.6 million Pakistan: 62.0 million Philippines: 56.1 million Russian Federation: 56.0 million Thailand: 50.8 million Bangladesh: 41.1 million |
|
| ▲ | vachina 41 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No more exporting of Murican culture and ideologies. Kinda cool on a second thought. |
|
| ▲ | cjbgkagh 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I presume the US market is the dominant target market for ads / influencing, a quick google search suggests it is 75% of the global spend. So the other issue is not just losing US influencers but all influencers will take a haircut. I don't know how much of popular content is paid for by such revenue but taking a 75% haircut could put a real damper on content producers - especially those who make it a full time job. I don't know if that'll make it better with an increase in proportion of more organic content. I personally don't use TikTok - I waste enough time on HN. There is an additional separate issue that influencer is a coveted 'career' for many children (~30%), so not only would it wipe out many jobs it'll kill their dreams. I guess like cancelling the space program at a time when kids really wanted to be astronauts. I think there is a lot wrong with society and TikTok is part of it - but that's a much longer discussion for some other time. |
| |
| ▲ | bjourne 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | If so, good riddance. The good point of TikTok is that the videos appear genuine and wholesome. Not the hyper-optimized for monetization crap YouTube Shorts show you. I much prefer the videos with kids goofing around on icy streets over the American narrator telling me some bs about some great baseball player. | |
| ▲ | handfuloflight 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > it'll kill their dreams. They can dream new dreams. I didn't become an astronaut—and realized I didn't actually want to become one, either. | | |
| ▲ | cjbgkagh 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sometimes dreams are all they have - especially if they're young. I think we have to understand the reality that the economy today is not what it once was, not even close. I think a lot of people are looking to the influence trade since they see the corporate / political / economic future as failing them and they want to carve out something on their own while the getting is good and while they still can. Sure some just want to be famous but others appear to have a very realistic view of their prospects both as an influencer and elsewhere. | | |
| ▲ | handfuloflight 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | But how viable is it? There's 47 active astronauts and millions of children have dreamt of becoming one. | | |
| ▲ | cjbgkagh 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Well the Astronaut dream clearly wasn’t viable, influencer isn’t viable for 30% of the population but it could be viable for a much bigger proportion. | |
| ▲ | TheOtherHobbes 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | A lot of creative people were doing very well on TikTok. It made the careers of a huge number of indie writers. When I say "made" I mean "Earning six or even seven figures." Crafts and art services were also doing well. And certain influencers, obviously. It pretty much took over from Insta, which Meta somehow managed to shoot in the head with some of their algo changes. So - politics aside - that community is pretty unhappy about this. Dealing with this is going to be interesting insight into Trump's leanings. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | logicchains 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Hopefully the US tech industry is not so schlerotic that they're unable to clone it and offer a competitive alternative. Given TikTok has demonstrated there's a huge amount of money to be made in that space. Although given how awful Google Shorts and Reels' recommendation algorithms are in comparison, maybe there really will be no replacement. | | |
| ▲ | HankB99 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This was covered in a recent podcast. Apparently TikTok classifies videos on many more factors than e.g. Youtube and other US companies. China can do this because they have a cheap pool of many users who can perform this activity. The podcaster felt that with AI capabilities getting better day by day (maybe - that's another discussion) that this multi factor classification could be automated. It seems not to have been done yet AFAIK. | |
| ▲ | cjbgkagh 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You'd think with all the H1Bs the US is importing some of those could bring in some recommendation engine expertise. The truth is that the recommendation engine is power and people drawn to power in the US were too quick to abuse it driving out the old hands - and once institutional knowledge is lost it's hard to get back. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nihonde an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I remember pre-Musical.ly TikTok here in Japan, and it was MUCH better then. In fact, it noticeably degraded when Musical.ly was folded in. American social media culture revolves around money and sex in a way that isn't as popular in Korea/Japan/S. Asia—roughly speaking, the original scope of TikTok's userbase, since Douyin has always kept Chinese users separate. Don't get me wrong, there's plenty of garbage social media content in Asia, but it's more boomers and gen-z era that consume hentai/money flexing/politics/etc., so that nonsense was almost completely absent in the early days of TikTok, when the users were mostly Asian teenagers and young adults trading choreography, in-jokes, and showing off their video editing skills. |
|
| ▲ | whycome 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How will YouTube shorts, and instagram stories pivot? They already aren’t seen as true rivals, but maybe they can change or spinoff a third brand. The gold in TR has always been its algorithm. Maybe they can fake it. How easy will it be to circumvent via vpn? Will other English content on tt skyrocket? Eg uk and Canada. |
| |
| ▲ | glenstein 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | >The gold in TR has always been its algorithm. Yes, but it's also singularly focused on its core experience rather than being a bolted-on experience that is confusingly blended into an ecosystem where it's not the primary experience. | |
| ▲ | redserk 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | YouTube Shorts is terrible. YouTube clearly wanted to have some answer to short-form video but without putting much effort into it. Instagram Reels is a bit better but it feels very "sanitized" and fake. | | |
| ▲ | epolanski 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm really at loss at how bad Google is at algorithms considering how pioneering they have been in selecting engineers based on their algorithmic skills and their immense contributions to the whole ML sector. I can let Spotify play on its own for hours and it will be just right...Even with songs I know nothing about, it's just very good. I tried Tik Tok once and I could see how easily it could pick content. But Youtube and Youtube Music are a disaster. Youtube Music is a decent service, but it's hard to get suggested anything really. Youtube Shorts are a disaster. Sure I like the Sopranos, I find some Joe Rogan's interview interesting and sure I like the NBA, but that's virtually all it feeds me, even if I start scrolling away to other topics. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | qingcharles 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It will still legally have American content, but only propaganda :) https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/biden-administration-quiet... |
|
| ▲ | gunian 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don't think it will survive because non American cultural exports are not quite there yet you have to be born outside the US to understand the reach of Hollywood/cultural export as an opinion shaping tool But then again Telegram survived and they had to resort to kidnapping the CEO so if it does survive the US pretty much gifted that space to a geopolitical adversary But I'm pretty sure Langley/MD folk thought about this and are betting on it not surviving |
|
| ▲ | rtkwe 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It will take ages for that to happen. AFAIK the "ban" only really removes it from app stores, I don't think it even requires store owners to force it off of phones that have downloaded it already. |
| |
| ▲ | jhaile 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Although TikTok has said they are gearing up to shut the service down. | | |
| ▲ | glenstein 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I wonder if it's more of a deactivation pending XYZ, with a readiness to flip the on-switch back on if there's a policy change in the U.S. (which it seems like there might be). |
| |
| ▲ | nickthegreek 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The data must be hosted in the US. Oracle will have to shutdown their servers. | |
| ▲ | OKRainbowKid 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It probably prevents them from distributing updates though. | | |
| ▲ | rtkwe 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | True enough but I don't think that will be fast either. The main reason to update would be features and they can keep the old version of any APIs up to support US customers. Other than that the only reason they would have to update is any breaking changes in Android/iOS which are a lot rarer these days afaik since they're both so mature as OSs. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | TaurenHunter 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Orkut was one American social network that barely had any American content because it was taken over by Brazilians. |
|
| ▲ | 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | peoplenotbots 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There are such products. Outside of America whatsapp is a dominant social app but its use internally is almost mute despite being an american social app. Tiktok america is over 50% of tiktok revenue I think that more than anything else would choke out growth world wide. |
|
| ▲ | adamanonymous 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Will we see internationalized Chinese content dominating it? TikTok does not exist in China, they have their own version -- Douyin -- that complies with their more stringent privacy laws. |
|
| ▲ | victor106 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| TikTok is banned in India too |
|
| ▲ | davedx 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| India also banned TikTok a while ago |
|
| ▲ | franczesko 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Some other countries banned tiktok too, e.g. India |
| |
|
| ▲ | Waterluvian 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think it’s going to be a lesson to Americans about just how little their content actually matters to the other 96% of the world. |
|
| ▲ | ngcc_hk 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How about WeChat, little red book, … in fact the mainland version of tt, … |
|
| ▲ | fuzzfactor 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If a US-based alternative appeared which not only substituted performatively, but also monetized creators and influencers enough to put everyone else to shame, people could not help but notice and migrate there in droves. It would be pretty cool if there was a respectable capitalist with enough money, or if that won't do it then a bigger more-respectable political organization or something, and Tiktok would be nothing but a memory of how things used to be before they got better. Think about it, a social force or financial pressure strong enough to reverse unfavorable trends, even after they have already gained momentum. And all it takes is focusing that pressure in an unfamiliar direction that could probably best be described as "anti-enshittification". I know, that's a tall ask, never mind . . . |
| |
| ▲ | bee_rider 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | I’d worry that such a platform would be used to reverse social trends unfavorable to the owner, instead of social trends unfavorable to society in general. It also seems… sort of bad if an individual has the ability to be strong enough to reverse a social trend, right? So we basically would have to expect one of the trends they should reverse to be… their own existence. In general it is unreasonable to expect individuals to be so enlightened as to work against their own existence, I think. | | |
| ▲ | glenstein 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is why I can't wait for Loops to enable real federation, because it distributes this over a number of instances and isn't putting all the eggs in one basket. | |
| ▲ | fuzzfactor 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | >such a platform would be used to reverse social trends unfavorable to the owner, Could very well be why Tiktok appeared to begin with, as the original owner's mission. You're right, anyone who replaced it would most likely have the same mission. Otherwise, >expect one of the trends they should reverse to be… their own existence. Yeah, that won't happen. Very few could afford it anyway, probably only the usual suspects. Ah, so Confucius say "Enshittification will be its own reward". I guess that's as enlightened as things are going to get :\ |
|
|
|
| ▲ | MuffinFlavored 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is TikTok big in Europe? Is Europe big on social media? |
| |
|
| ▲ | cryptonector 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > This is going to be an interesting experiment: Unclear. Biden and Trump both have stated that they will decline to enforce this law. |
|
| ▲ | cyanydeez 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Until trump lets it sink, tgis is mwaninvless. Cash bribes are how laws are define now. Is america avaluable audiemce? |
|
| ▲ | jmyeet 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| First, I still don't think the ban will actually happen. The current administration will punt the issue to the next and Trump has already signaled he wants to save Tiktok, whatever that means. That might be by anointing a buyer that he personally is an investor in. Tiktok may choose to still shutter in the US rather than being forcibly sold. But there's a biger issue than loss of American content should this come to pass: the loss os American ad revenue for the platform and creators. A lot of people create content aimed at Americans because an American audience is lucrative for ad revenue. If that goes away, what does that do to the financial viability of the platform? |
| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Trump has already signaled he wants to save Tiktok Trump can blame Biden and move on. > If that goes away, what does that do to the financial viability of the platform? Bytedance makes most of its money from Douyin. | | |
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | He has a major donor that owns part of TikTok. He'll save it for corrupt reasons, ignore the real concerns about it, then move on. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | > He has a major donor that owns part of TikTok He has a major donor who owns part of Bytedance. They’re not losing their investment with this ban. | | |
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | 1. Then why is that investor so aggressively against the forced divestment? (not a ban) 2. Bytedance will certainly lose value if its main product loses one of its main markets. | |
| ▲ | NickC25 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | He also has a major donor who owns Meta, and a major donor who owns Twitter/X. He also has a daughter who is the only American to hold patents in China without having to license IP to a Chinese company. We are about to see some strange mental gymnastics out of 1600 Penn. | | |
| ▲ | throwawayq3423 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Anyone with significant financial interests in China should not be able to represent the US in confronting China. And yet.. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | insane_dreamer 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | More like Trump can use it as a bargaining chip with China. | |
| ▲ | blackeyeblitzar 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | A worrying angle is that Elon is essentially subservient to the CCP because of Tesla’s presence in China. Remember when Tesla signed a pledge to uphold socialism at the behest of the CCP a couple years back? It’s also why Elon - who claims to uphold free speech, capitalism, democratic values, etc - will NEVER say anything negative about China. If Trump is close to Elon, and Elon is easily influenced/controlled by the CCP, it really undermines the independence of US leadership. I am concerned this next administration will be soft on China in all the wrong ways, including not enforcing a ban that has been legally instituted and upheld unanimously by SCOTUS. |
|
|
| ▲ | dyauspitr 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Or Indian content. It will probably end up getting banned in a lot of places over time. |
|
| ▲ | hshshshshsh 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Instagram and Facebook is more popular outside the US and China than TikTok. |
| |
| ▲ | schroeding 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | At least in Germany, for Gen Z, Facebook is quite dead and Instagram co-exists with TikTok, both with >70% of the cohort [1] using them. There is no clear winner. Anecdata, but for freshmen, TikTok is way more popular. TikTok-based social media campaigns also e.g. managed to unexpectedly swing an election in Romania (for Georgescu, was later annulled). [1] https://www.absatzwirtschaft.de/tiktok-vs-instagram-ein-verg... - sorry, I only found a German source | | |
| ▲ | gunian 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why do you think Instagram is immune from being used in social media based campaign? The only difference between TikTok and Instagram is the recommendation engine they use | | |
| ▲ | schroeding 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | ... I do not think that it's immune? I don't see where I implied this, sorry if I was unclear. ^^' This specific campaign was done via TikTok, though, and had massive impact, which shows that TikTok has heavy usage and is popular, outside of the US and China. (I'm not American, I have no horse in this "ban foreign TikTok" race. :D) | | |
| ▲ | gunian 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sorry me neither english no good the thing I'm trying to understand why do you think they used TikTok over YT shorts or Instagram Reels? What makes it better suited from a coding POV usage numbers suggest comparable MAUs for all three | | |
| ▲ | schroeding 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | That it was done via TikTok was widely reported by news outlets on all sides of the political spectrum where I live. Why they've done it via TikTok - I simply don't know. :D Maybe better discoverability via the For You page? | | |
| ▲ | gunian 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | aw man disappointing was hoping someone had a dataset for rating discoverability, platform bias etc tired of news from all spectrums :) maybe next Christmas if I'm not on the Santa naughty list | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | cm2012 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| India also just banned TikTok, I wouldn't be surprised if bans became widespread outside of America with any country worried about China's geopolitical power. |