Remix.run Logo
lateforwork 8 hours ago

This is a major challenge to Microsoft. A 13-inch Surface Laptop costs $899 [1], that's 50% more than an equivalent MacBook! And even at that higher price the Surface Laptop doesn't have a good screen: it uses 150% scaling (as opposed to the ideal 200%) which means you have subtle display artifacts.

Other than Microsoft nobody even makes decent laptops in the Windows world. I am typing this on an Lenovo Yoga, it has decent screen and keyboard, but the touchpad is horrible. Samsung makes good laptops but my keyboard gave out after just 2 years. Most other laptop makers have horrible industrial design. Dell XPS 17 was pretty good, but now they have weird keyboard.

The best laptop is now significantly cheaper than the horrible ones. Incredible achievement by Apple, and a major challenge to Windows laptop makers.

[1] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/configure/surface-lapt...

xtracto 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I was recently in the lookout for a new laptop. I wanted something BEEFFY! Specs wise but 13 inch at most.

I literally couldn't find anything on the PC side. I wanted an x86 because I prefer Linux Mint as my OS (didn't care about windows) , but it was impossible to find a good laptop with good GPU , more than 64gb ram and decent build materials (ive got a thinpad and the platic build is just terrible. The screen bends when pulling it to open the laptop).

So, if settled for a 128gb ram M4 max Macbookpro. It has been pretty solid so far. I'm a power user, so the RAM is used quite a lot (one of the reasons I wanted x86/Linux was to avoid virtualization overhead in docker/podman).

Macs are way more expensive than other laptops, but their level of tech sophistication is miles ahead of anyone.

Now, if only Asahi was more complete.

pie_flavor 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I am a longtime Windows user and it brings me absolutely no joy to report that the M4 I am forced to use for work runs the Rust compiler a good bit faster than the big fancy gaming PC I just got with a 9800X3D.

satvikpendem 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Rust literally compiles ~4x faster on WSL than on the Windows command line, on the same hardware, so try that and see. Also set up the mold or wild linker as well as sccache, although sccache is OS agnostic so you can use it on macOS too. Make sure your code is on the WSL side not on /mnt/c which is the Windows side though, that will kill compilation speed.

https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/s/CsEy9bLivK

fluoridation 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That has not been my experience at all; I get pretty much the same times on the same machine on Linux and Windows. Something weird has happening to that person. Someone mentioned Defender, and that could certainly be it, as I have it totally disabled (forcibly, by deleting the executable).

michaelcampbell 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

At least 10 years ago, some IBM tools I was forced to use worked faster in a linux VM on Windows (through VirtualBox) than on Windows.

rstat1 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd wager that's more likely due to Windows than the hardware. Like sure the hardware does play a part in that but its not the whole story or even most of it.

My C++ projects have a python heavy build system attached where the main script that runs to prepare everything and kick off the build, takes significantly longer to run on Windows than Linux on the same hardware.

m_mueller 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Afaik a lot of it is ntfs. It’s just so slow with lots of small files. Compare unzipping moderately large source repos on windows vs. POSIX, it’s day and night.

p_ing 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No, it’s not NTFS, it’s the file system filter architecture of the NT kernel.

mattbee 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I had internalised that it was Windows Defender hooking every file operation and checking it against a blacklist? I've had it forced off for years.

PaulHoule 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Just deleting 40,000 files from the node_modules of a modest Javascript project can thoroughly hammer NTFS.

fluoridation 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I think part of that is Explorer, rather than NTFS. Try doing it from the console instead. rd /q /s <dir>.

PaulHoule 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It still takes a lot longer than Linux or Mac OS X.

fluoridation 2 hours ago | parent [-]

NTFS is definitely slower to modify file system structures than ext4.

PaulHoule an hour ago | parent [-]

A big part of it is that NT has to check with the security manager service every time it does a file operation.

The original WSL for instance was a very NT answer to the problem of Linux compatibility: NT already had a personality that looked like Windows 95, just make one that looks like Linux. It worked great with the exception of the slow file operations which I think was seen as a crisis over Redmond because many software developers couldn’t or wouldn’t use WSL because of the slow file operations affecting many build systems. So we got the rather ugly WSL2 which uses a real Linux filesystem so the files perform like files on Linux.

thewebguyd 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Try adding your working directory to the exclusions for windows defender, or creating a Dev Drive instead in settings (will create a separate partition, or VHD using ReFS and exclude it from Windows defender). Should give it a bit of a boost.

everfrustrated 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Apple buries this info but the memory bandwidth on the M series is very high. Doubly and triply so for the Pro & Max variants which are insanely high.

Not much in the PC line up comes close and certainly not at the same price point. There's some correlation here between PCs still wanting to use user-upgradable memory which can't work at the higher bandwidths vs Apple integrating it into the cpu package.

chocochunks an hour ago | parent [-]

They don't bury it. It's literally on the spec page these days. And LPCAMM2 falls somewhere between the base M and Pro CPUs while still being replaceable.

The new MacBook Neo is a less than half the memory bandwidth of the base model MacBook Air.

teaearlgraycold 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You’re running Windows unironically?

0x457 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That's most likely because windows indexes and scans files rustc produces. My linux machines demolish my iMac in rust compilation.

ErneX 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Intel iMac?

0x457 3 hours ago | parent [-]

M4. To be fair I bought it as a pretty ssh terminal in living room into compute in another room.

Liftyee 7 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Which Thinkpad do you have? Lenovo have introduced some lines with the name but diminished quality.

luke5441 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is how opinions differ. IMO plastic is better than aluminium. It is robust (if done right), lighter and doesn't have good thermal conductivity (which makes laptop usage possible, MacBooks can be uncomfortable for lap usage if too hot).

The metal is more "luxury", though.

swiftcoder 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> MacBooks can be uncomfortable for lap usage if too hot

This was definitely the case in the Intel era, but I can't say I've had this problem since the move to Apple silicon

luke5441 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I have an Air. Maybe active cooling prevents it from getting too hot. With the Air, the metal body is kind of the heatsink.

I can configure my Snapdragon plastic laptop such that the fan doesn't turn on, so the body being metal isn't a requirement for not turning on the fan...

p_ing 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If the body was a heatsink, it would be extremely hot to the touch.

https://hothardware.com/news/make-your-m1-macbook-air-perfor...

nandomrumber 4 hours ago | parent [-]

From your link:

Essentially the bottom cover of the MacBook Air becomes one large heatsink

Anyway, the author claims:

you are the type that likes to work with the MacBook Air on your lap it will be quite a bit more toasty than before.

Does toasty mean extremely hot?

The Apple M4 CPU is, if I recall correctly, capable of converting 20 watts of electrical energy in to heat, at full throttle.

Is that likely to bring the back plate or a MBA above 45 degrees?

You’re probably right, with sustained workloads it could.

Everything’s a trade off.

necovek 2 hours ago | parent [-]

In a Notebookcheck test, they got the bottom plate up to 43C, and top plate near the screen up to 45C: https://www.notebookcheck.net/The-passively-cooled-M4-SoC-ma...

caycep 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

hence the Neo and the iPhone chip!

xnx 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> MacBooks can be uncomfortable for lap usage if too hot).

My body is the heatsink

arbirk 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Also for males it is natural birth control. Can be a plus depending on your situation

kokanee 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

YOU GUYS IT HAS A HEADPHONE JACK

joemi 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Don't all macbooks have one?

joecool1029 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Makes me wonder if this is an ADA requirement for education devices. (assistive listening devices)

jkestner 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not even ADA - kids all get headphones to listen to education materials. Wired headphones are way, way easier to manage.

monocularvision 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There’s also plenty of room for it which is why it continues to appear on all MacBooks.

satvikpendem 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This isn't news, all MacBooks have one.

binkHN 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> plastic is better than aluminium. It is robust (if done right), lighter and doesn't have good thermal conductivity (which makes laptop usage possible

Yep. I miss my plastic phones too.

pbreit 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd go further and suggest that metal is a lousy substance for laptop enclosures.

whateverboat 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Plastic is better if done right. I do not know a single manufacturer today which does plastic right.

ekianjo 6 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Did you check what Framework offers?

michaelt 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I wanted something BEEFFY! Specs wise but 13 inch at most.

One thing to bear in mind is bezels are a lot thinner than they were a few years ago.

~7 years ago, my daily driver was a Latitude E7270 - a 12.5 inch ultrabook with dimensions of 215.15 mm x 310.5 mm x 18.30 mm, 1.24 kg, 14.8 inch body diagonal

Today, an XPS 14 has dimensions 209.71 mm x 309.52 mm x 15.20mm, 1.36 kg, 14.7 body diagonal - and a 14-inch screen.

The 12.5 inch segment hasn't disappeared - it's just turned into the 14-inch segment.

necovek 2 hours ago | parent [-]

My Sony Vaio Z from 2009 or 2010 looks at your Dell in contempt: 13.1" FullHD screen at 314mm x 210mm (we'll pretend the thickness does not matter ;)) and 1.36kg. Vaio TT was even smaller footprint.

But even in 2018, you could get an X1 Carbon at 1.13kg and 323mm x 217mm x 15.5mm.

Matl 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What about something like [1].

1 - https://rog.asus.com/laptops/rog-flow/rog-flow-z13-2025/

jemmyw 29 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

One thing Apple seems to do very well compared to other vendors is make all their hardware available in all markets on release. Companies like Dell, Asus, Lenovo, they have a confusingly large array of models, and they never release the best ones worldwide, or it takes so long to get to New Zealand that I already gave up and bought an Apple computer instead.

SaltyBackendGuy 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I might be a dinosaur but I just can't stand laptops that have touch screen...

carefree-bob 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I, too, am a dinosaur, but touchscreens on removable screens/tablets are the way to go!

My friend, just imagine: Slide screen out of laptop, it's a standalone tablet. Connect some wires to it and you have an oscilloscope. Do some diag. Connect USB buses to it, and read some codes. Carry it around in your garage and take photos of your stuff, the images get recognized by AI and you've updated your garage inventory, it's uploaded to your Homebox running on a mac mini in a shelf somewhere. It has a built in cellular and you can be out in a park taking a picture of a baby owl, mark it with GPS, upload.

When you are done roaming the world loading in data and snapping pics, sit back down, connect the tablet to a keyboard, or even a thunderbird cable for your external display and peripherals, and write up some code or a report. Then in the evening, go play some games, all on the same computer.

It's awesome!

itsfine2 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You might want to actually click the links and spent a couple of minutes before typing comments. This is not a laptop with a touch screen - it's a tablet with a kickstand and detachable keyboard.

achenet 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I accidentally got a pair of ThinkPads that happened to have touch screens, and I absolutely love the touch screen, often it's easier than the touchpad or keyboard nub.

w0m 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> (ive got a thinpad and the platic build is just terrible. The screen bends when pulling it to open the laptop).

Which thinkpad? Typing on a loaded P16s currently; it's not metal like old MBP or even my travel surface pro, but it feels... fine.

vrganj 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The HP Zbook G1A is what you wanted. It's Strix Halo with up to 128GB of unified RAM and built like a MBP.

5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
hypercube33 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

ASUS ROG G14 is as close as you're going to get on the x86 side of things or that new chonk of a surface with the Ryzen 395+ and 128gb of ram. both are like $2500+

mrbuttons454 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I have the chonk. 10/10 would chonk again. I miss the 12" MacBook form factor for an email/web/dumb terminal machine, though. Would love something like that with great Linux support. Bonus points for cellular.

nailer 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> ive got a thinpad and the platic build is just terrible. The screen bends when pulling it to open the laptop

Damn. I was at IBM in the early 2000s and for many decades you used to be able to beat people to death with IBM hardware, including Thinkpad laptops and model M keyboards.

Eric_WVGG 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I have so many questions.

- Was there a lab where they tested beating people to death with IBM hardware?

- Where did they find subjects? Volunteers, interns, exit-interviews from layoff rounds?

- Now that you can't beat people to death with IBM hardware, what do you use instead?

mkreis 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Shh... we don't talk about those dark ages any more. Times were different.

jkestner 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> - Where did they find subjects? Volunteers, interns, exit-interviews from layoff rounds?

Standard issue for field agents in the corporate acquisitions and consulting divisions.

(Hey, Eric!)

soneil 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Now that you can't beat people to death with IBM hardware, what do you use instead?

I believe IBM hardware is still applicable for this, the Thinkpad just isn't IBM hardware anymore.

dragonwriter 4 hours ago | parent [-]

The hard part of beating someone to death with a z16 is lifting and swinging a z16; if you can manage that, though...

agildehaus 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

We test these things in production.

vunderba 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The best laptop that I ever had was an Thinkpad T530 back in ~2012 - that chunky brick felt like it was made from recycled soviet tanks.

Modular as hell - trivial to swap out batteries, cd-rom bay with an extra SSD, RAM upgrades, keyboard itself.

entropicdrifter 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Thinkpad build quality depends heavily on the model. The flagship T-series are still tough as nails, generally speaking

reactordev 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They built a reputation on that and silently replaced the plastic with crap abs. Thinkpads have been garbage since 2012. Not specs wise but build quality wise. Spec wise it’s always been a beefy machine.

rrnechmech 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

necovek 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You do have 13" options, though 14" is much wider. If I was going for 13" workstation, I'd go for Asus ProArt PX13 with Ryzen AI Max 395 (if I got that right, there might be a plus somewhere) and 128GiB of RAM. They've got ROG Flow X13 with older hardware or Z13 with same hw as above, but that's a tablet computer instead.

At 14", thin-and-light gaming computers like Asus G14 or Razer Blade 14 look decent, or some of the workstation models from Lenovo or HP.

Still, for me, at 13/14", portability and battery are most important, so I am going with Thinkpad X1 Carbon atm (next gen should again allow 64GiB of RAM).

delusional 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What are your use-cases for 128gb of RAM? I find it hard to imagine what you could be doing with that, so it must be interesting :)

macNchz 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm not the person you're replying to, but I do have a 64GB machine that I'd been planning to bump up to 128 right around the time the prices went through the roof. My uses are:

- VMs, I'm leaning on them more and more for sandboxing stuff I'm working on, both because of the rise in software supply chain threats, and to put guardrails around AI agents.

- Local LLMs experimentation, even pretty big MoE models (GPT OSS 120b) run pretty usably (~10 tokens/sec) with the latest tooling on a 16GB GPU and a lot of system memory.

- Even compared to a fast NvME drive, it's super nice to load a big dataset into memory and just process it right there, compared to working off of the disk.

grogenaut 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Unreal + blender + ide.

Fusion + blender + slicers.

Virt machines / docker + dev env

iOS Android web development

16 copies of Claude code, cursor or kiro

Any of that while running arc raiders and watching twitch or YouTube or plex

My gaming PC is usually at 50-70 gb use

My mbp for work is often at 90 and starting to swap.

My personal mbp is only 48gb and often swapping

I have 128 in everything except my smaller mbp personal.

therouwboat 4 hours ago | parent [-]

You mean all of that running all the time is 70gb?

I tried freecad + blender with 8 mil sculpt model + prusaslicer, but that was only 11gb, so I added pycharm + steam and cyberpunk 2099 and that was 19gb.

dzonga 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

most people who are into graphics processing e.g video-games, 3d for films/entertainment industry etc need these "PRO-workstation" machines, or doing fluid mechanics

if your work is around data | software engineering (web backends etc) like me - a MacBook Air tends to be sufficient

0x457 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Running FatLTO on Chrome.

game_the0ry 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> This is a major challenge to Microsoft.

> Other than Microsoft nobody even makes decent laptops in the Windows world.

I get the impression that microsoft and the pc world have given up on consumer hardware and instead are completely focused on enterprise and ai. That's why windows 11 is saturated with bugs and is basically unusable, but enterprise is forced to buy it.

thewebguyd 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It definitely feels that way. Microsoft has made it clear they don't care about the consumer market anymore. Xbox is dying or already dead, they've done nothing with the game studios they acquired, Windows laptop OEMs still ship plastic 1080p crap targeted at general office workers.

They'll continue to sell it, because it's effectively free surveillance for them, but they certainly aren't focusing on the consumer market as a target demographic.

And with less and less windows-specific apps now a days, there's very little reason for the average user to buy a Windows laptop, especially over this new macbook.

pjmlp 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Indeed they haven't, Microsoft is only one of the biggest publishers in the world, and regardless of XBox the console, Microsoft Games Studios is doing great.

jimbokun 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Probably too late now but maybe they should have spun XBox and the game studios into a separate company.

leptons 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>That's why windows 11 is saturated with bugs and is basically unusable

That's far, far from my experience. What bugs are you talking about that make it "unusable"? I've been on Win11 for years and it's been no problem at all. No bugs that I can think of.

game_the0ry 4 hours ago | parent [-]

You must be lucky. They have been well-documented. [1]

The constant, annoying reminder to sign up for One Drive is enough to drive me crazy and want to throw my device out the window (I am writing this from a windows 11 laptop that I use for experimentation).

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46000098

bloomca 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Apple seemed to copy this one exactly as iCloud asks you the same all the time. Honestly these days Linux feels like the only sane platform as you can customize it properly.

game_the0ry 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I am a big fan of the command line, but running linux as my daily driver is like trying to daily a kit car -- it breaks all the time and i spend more time than i want fixing it. With macos, i get my beloved command line, nice hardware, and a reliable OS. Win win win.

TacticalCoder 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> I am a big fan of the command line, but running linux as my daily driver is like trying to daily a kit car -- it breaks all the time and i spend more time than i want fixing it.

Linux powers the entire world. Billions if not tens of billions of devices. It doesn't "break all the time like a kit car". I switched my wife's desktop from Ubuntu to Debian about a year ago and I haven't heard a single complain. Not a single crash. She hardly reboots her computer. The thing is just rock solid and it needs to be: she works from home and she spends 8 hours+ on her (Linux) computer.

game_the0ry 20 minutes ago | parent [-]

Fair. Last time I tried to daily Linux was 2016 with a crappy dell I had laying around, and I am pretty sure that I did not know what I was doing. I have been on Mac since 2012 and I tried windows in 2019 only to regret it, then went back to mac.

leptons an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

That is also far from my experience. I'm starting to think it's more about you than about the tech. I have 5 machines running Linux, and they never break (1 server and 4 VMs). I have 4 machines running Windows (3 physical, 1 VM), with zero problems for many years.

GeekyBear 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Microsoft's build quality is largely equivalent, but the press has already noticed that the value proposition at Microsoft is now lacking.

> Apple's newest MacBook is an impressive play for affordability, right as the Surface line is looking expensive and out of touch.

https://www.pcworld.com/article/3077961

hightrix 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It really isn’t. The track pad on surface is terrible compared to Mac. The surface has some weird edges and other spots to get caught on. I’ve seen a few with serious damage from typical daily use. The surface I have is barely hanging together, the charger is extremely finicky and will stop charging randomly. It takes effort to get the charger to “sit” in the slot and make contact.

That said, my surface is pretty old so maybe some of these design flaws have been fixed.

But from my experience, the build quality of the MacBook is in a different league than the surface.

dijit 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

telling that this is flagged 1 minute into submission.

Microsoft hardware was in the premium tier for sure (and continues to be: relative to others), but these days nearly all the OEMs have pretty bad warts across the line-up, even the surface books, even the new ARM ones (which are quite good).

For work I have a Thinkpad T14S (ARM also) and it is a better quality notebook than the Surface book others in my organisation have (those feel like a 95%-ish imitation of Macbooks, the only variations being strict downgrades in their respective areas).

So I'd push back on the idea that nobody is making good Windows computers, but it seems to be fewer and fewer, and the big brands like Dell Latitude and HP Elitebook are also dropping the ball for a long time now.

a1o 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Dell Pro Max, I think the Latitude line disappeared. But I feel Lenovo is the last one too, the only brand I trust for a Windows or Linux machine these days. I like Apple hardware and have my reservations with macOS, but it is still better than Windows.

GeekyBear 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I can't think of another company on the PC side whose consumer line of hardware's build quality hasn't declined to the level of junk.

You have to step up to their enterprise line (and pay enterprise prices) to get something decent.

regularfry 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The camera on the Surface is nowhere near as good as on my M1 Macbook Air, either. That seems to be a weird blind spot on laptops in general, it's very obviously an afterthought on my personal Dell XPS as well.

98codes 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> serious damage from typical daily use

Doing what? I've used one of those laptops for years, and it still looks and acts fine, hardware-wise. Windows though...

hightrix 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Taking the laptop to the office and back home again daily. The hinge has gotten weak over time. The connection to take off the screen is very fragile, tapping the button to enable removal only works about half the time. Then, when re-attaching the screen sometimes it doesn't catch, or the keyboard connects but doesn't realize it is connected so the machine stays in tablet mode. The trackpad has gotten spongey and harder to click.

It didn't happen to me, but of the 4 people in direct team that had them, 2 had battery issues where the battery expanded making the laptop unusable. *Edit: This was covered under warranty, thankfully

This is from approximately 2 years of daily use for work. I no longer use my surface.

I typically care for my laptops very diligently. I still use my MBP from 2012 and it works like a champ. I don't have a windows laptop anymore, but my main desktop is windows. I'm not a Mac fanboy.

miohtama 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You get free AI slop and mass-surveillance advertisements in your Start menu. Who would not like that!

MarcelOlsz 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

fortran77 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Your Mac "fanboy" nonsense is tiring. The Surface 7 Laptop is an excellent machine, built well, and even gets a good iFixit rating (4 screws and you can replace the battery and M.2)

buzzerbetrayed 5 hours ago | parent [-]

You left out the part where the build quality is not up to par with a MacBook, which is what is actually being discussed.

leptons 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I'd rather have a thousand form-factors and build qualities to choose from than the one-size-fits-all that Apple offers. If Apple doesn't make it, then you can't run their software on it, and they don't make too many form factors.

I can run Windows on a USB stick form-factor if I want to. Or dozens of tablet sizes from various vendors. And every kind of laptop imaginable, with all kinds of features. And everything else up to massive rack-mount server hardware. But sure, if a Macbook is all you need, then go for it.

NietTim 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is not primarily competing with the surface line of laptops, this is mostly competing with chromebooks which dominate schools. That's a completely different segment of devices.

runjake 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I am in education and speak to others at the (US) national level on a near-daily basis. This doesn't compete with Chromebooks in schools at all.

- Chromebooks in EDU cost approximately $290 (+- $10) per unit.

- The Neo costs $499 per unit for schools.

- For the cost of 10 Neos, I can buy 17 Chromebooks. Yes, this is a numbers game. The goal is every student has a device.

- Schools using Chromebooks to log in. If you want reliable Google logins on macOS, you have an additional big spend up front, along with per-seat licensing costs.

- This doesn't even factor in MDM and app cost comparisons.

lm28469 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I saw this today: https://www.reddit.com/r/KidsAreFuckingStupid/comments/1rk3t...

If apple products are even a tiny bit more durable I wouldn't be surprise if it's more cost effective to switch to the neo for a lot of institutions

jonhohle 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not just durability, but ergonomics. My kids have crappy screens, literally the worst trackpad I’ve ever used, and awful keys that hurt my hands minutes after typing (but I go all day on my personal computer).

If schools are found to be neglecting a minimum standard of care by subjecting kids to hardware that causes long term physical issues, they would have wished they would spend a little more (it amortizes to about $20/student year difference the way our school district does it).

the_sleaze_ 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Not just durability, but ergonomics.

Somehow while spending the most per capita of any nation on the planet, American schools are in a perpetual budget crunch. It's about getting internet access not whether the trackpad is good. You think a chromepad is crappy - have you ever tried to do something in Blackboard?

> If schools are found to be neglecting a minimum standard of care

They won't be. Pizza sauce is considered a vegetable.

An aside: Why do school board super-intendants and administration make more money than teachers themselves? I believe they shouldn't.

runjake 13 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

> Why do school board super-intendants and administration make more money than teachers themselves?

A couple reasons:

1. Because usually, superintendents and the administration are responsible and accountable for a lot more moving parts than teachers are. Aside from the many kids each teacher teachers, which leads us to point #2.

2. There is a lot more supply of teachers than demand. If a teacher doesn't like their objectively meager pay, they can quit. There are 10 applicants lined up waiting to take their position.

> I believe they shouldn't.

This is generally handled at your city level. Organize your like-minded constituents to lobby the board?

dragonwriter 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Why do school board super-intendants and administration make more money than teachers themselves?

The more and less cynical explanations (and both play a role, IMO):

(1) Because individuals in those roles have closer relationships to the people that set the salaries than do individual teachers, and

(2) Because otherwise people with experience in education would continue as teachers and not seek roles as superintendents or other administrators (or seek the advanced degrees sought for those roles whose only financial payoff is greater competitiveness for those higher paying roles.)

Aeolun 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think my school solves this by telling the parents to buy ‘something’ for the kids, as long as it has a webbrowser and keyboard.

jonhohle 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Our district had BYOD and just got rid of it this year. We used it because the teachers couldn’t manage keeping kids off games or YouTube on their Chromebooks during class. Even then, personal devices could not be used for state testing.

notatoad 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Chromebooks don’t have a durability problem. I doubt the MacBook is any more durable, even with an all metal construction - if anything, that probably makes it worse at absorbing impact than nice soft bendy plastic.

This is just how students treat laptops, and a more expensive unit only makes the problem worse.

malloci 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Actually metal's pretty bendy when compared to plastic (most anyway...mmv based upon formula).

The metal construction is what prompted me to switch over to macbook pro's back in the day. The plastic dell laptops i used to use couldn't handle the abuse that it took during all of the travel i was doing at the time (cases kept cracking). I switched to a pro and was rewarded later with it surviving a 5 foot fall from a car rental counter. It bent part of the corner, but the screen was still in tact and it continued to work well enough to get me through the trip. I suspect the plastic alternative would have been toast.

Having kids today and seeing how rough they are with their toys, I'm not confident that a plastic laptop would survive them long.

8ytecoder 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Metal is technically more elastic than an elastic band. With a Young’s modulus of 69 GPa for aluminum versus just 2 GPa for ABS, metal has the "memory" to snap back from significant pressure. Plastic, true to its name, is far more likely to hit its limit and stay permanently deformed. (That’s why metal bars are used to provide “flexibility” to buildings. Concrete provides the strength)

6SixTy 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Kids are given those for free, so there's no responsibility for them to keep them in good condition. It would take a restructuring of laptops within the school system to kids/families having a joint ownership over the laptop to stop them intentionally destroying them. Even then, there are complications like kids that will absolutely destroy anothers' for fun.

And knowing how laptop makers treat keyboard repairs, the keyboard switches are easy to damage beyond repair and expensive to replace, making them a target for "problem" kids in school districts with a dysfunctional penal system.

el_benhameen 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

My kids have (insanely shitty) chromebooks from school and we are absolutely responsible for the cost if they break. We have to sign a release at the beginning of the year. Whether or not they’d be able to collect from the vast majority of families is a different question, granted. But the responsibility is there.

doubled112 6 hours ago | parent [-]

In practice, there's a huge difference in responsibility between buying and sending your kid with a laptop and signing a paper that says you're responsible if it breaks. I'd also guess it depends on where you go to school.

My child's school provided Chromebook was broken from the beginning, so clearly they're not paying that much attention.

dragonwriter 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Kids are given those for free, so there's no responsibility for them to keep them in good condition.

Very often they aren't (the school devices are in-school resources that aren't given to the kids any more than their desks are) and anything the kids have out of school is bought by the parents (and even if they are given the computers by the school, usually the replacement costs is on the parents if there is damage). But, either way, grade school kids are, on average, irresponsible as a matter of cognitive development (its a big part of why children are treated differently than adults legally.)

> school districts with a dysfunctional penal system.

A school district that can be described as having a “penal system” is, ipso facto, dysfunctional.

cptskippy 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Who pays for the laptop when the school bully pours water on a kid's backpack? Or a kid has their bag in a seat and someone sits on it accidentally?

What happens when a kid's laptop is broken, regardless of the reason, and the family is unable to afford to repair it? Are we going to run into a similar situation that we had when kids couldn't pay for school lunch? Do teachers write "pay for a new laptop" in sharpie on the kid's arm for the parent?

A child's educational environment is a lot more chaotic, violent, and uncontrolled compared to an office environment. If you're issuing my child a $600 laptop and making me responsible for any damages, guess what's going to be kept at home in a secure location?

Making a child responsible for securing a laptop in an insecure environment isn't accountability, it's just a form of imprisonment.

olyjohn 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What happens when a backpack full of paper books is destroyed? When I was a kid, we were charged between $50-100 for a book that was written in or destroyed. I bet these days it would be $200 each. Yeah we were running around with $500-600 of books in our backpacks all the time.

growt 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

1) bully or bullys insurance 2) whoever sat on it Alternatively: Apple care? :)

stickfigure 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's a big if. Kids are little engines of chaos and destruction. The Neo might not be more durable, just more expensive.

prcrstntr 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't think institutions will care much about the enhanced durability since they treat laptops as disposable units anyway. Apple can only complete if they provide bulk deals which bring the overall cost in line with chromebooks.

runjake 7 hours ago | parent [-]

No, we really care about durability. The amount of damage is crazy. So many units are damaged that it would be cost-prohibitive to dispose and replace them.

The screenshot in that Reddit post more or less looks like ours. Schools generally repair these, if they have the technicians. And everyone is cannibalizing parts out of last generation models. It's like a Jawa shop.

> Apple can only compete if they provide bulk deals which bring the overall cost in line with chromebooks.

I've never seen, nor heard of Apple providing competitive prices, even in quantities of ~10,000 units. They haven't even gotten close and they've largely given up on the idea of Macs as a standard K12 school device. ~$250 iPads are still strong in low primary grades and special education, though.

mghackerlady 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I worked in my High Schools repair room in Junior year, and the Jawa shop is an apt description haha

joezydeco 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Can confirm Apple gave up on education. If they really cared you'd be able to have multiple accounts/profiles on iPad, and that's still not a thing that exists.

I did a major PTA fundraiser to buy iPads for our classrooms and they were pretty much never used because of this.

thewebguyd 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> you'd be able to have multiple accounts/profiles on iPad, and that's still not a thing that exists.

It does exist, it just requires the iPad to be managed via MDM, which most schools would have (and should implement if they don't have it). JamF, Mosyle, Business Essentials, InTune and probably any other MDM can put an iPad into shared iPad mode with multiple profiles.

k3nx 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Have you seen the classroom app? It allows for multiple profiles on an iPad. I've never used it, so I don't know how well it works.

https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/shared-ipad-overv...

themingus 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I could see the Neo as a viable option for teenage students. The high school I attended distributed a Chromebook to each student and hardware faults were far more common than student inflicted damage. Low build quality in everything from the hinges to the logic boards. Most students feared seeking a replacement device when theirs would break without having done anything wrong. A device with higher build quality and software longevity has the potential to save these institutions a reasonable sum of money in the long run.

Younger students on the other hand, Chromebooks remain the way to go. Most of the time, kids'll win in a race between their destructive tendencies and crappy hardware giving out.

runjake 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> I could see the Neo as a viable option for teenage students.

100% agreed. My statements weren't meant to indicate the Neo wasn't viable. They were meant to state that the Neo isn't going to replace Chromebooks in schools (as far as being District-purchased).

> The high school I attended distributed a Chromebook to each student and hardware faults were far more common than student inflicted damage. Low build quality in everything from the hinges to the logic boards.

Build quality has been steadily improving over the years. It's all still budget (target ~$290), but is more and more durable with each new generation.

alwillis 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> This doesn't compete with Chromebooks in schools at all.

Of course, it does. The price difference is small enough now that the Neo is in the running. There's no doubt the build quality is going to be much better than a Chromebook.

I worked in education for 20+ years; that $499 is just the starting price; a school or school district that buys them in quantity is going to get an even better price.

Sure, a Chromebook is better than nothing, and if you’re an impoverished school district, you may have no choice but to go with Chromebooks. But if there's an opportunity to get Macs at this price point, most school districts are going to take it.

Don't underestimate Apple's sales and support infrastructure. Many of the schools in the US are in areas with Apple retail stores, where sales and support work out of.

It's hard to imagine a school committee going with Chromebooks instead of Mac Neos for a little more money and likely better support. The parents aren't IT experts, but they know Apple is a trusted brand, and Macs are "better".

tim333 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Even so I imagine your average person needing something for education would consider both. The Neo may cost more but from my past experience of Apple stuff they will likely be better made.

runjake 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Certainly possible. But, in the US consider that Google and "one-to-one" Chromebooks are generally dominating and the curriculum more or less requires extensions and setting.

As an example, my kids try to do school work on one of the house Macs, but there's too many roadblocks so they just use their Chromebooks.

I used to buy my kids Chromebooks for school, but, since the pandemic, the school issues them, so I haven't bought any since.

> Apple stuff they will likely be better made

It depends on what you mean. Apple uses higher quality parts and is more sleek.

Chromebooks are more durable, take more abuse, are very repairable, and parts are cheap and plentiful. These are keys to schools. We're at a point where schools cycle out old models and either keep a bunch around, or strip parts from them, because some parts are interchangeable between generations.

3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
zarzavat 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If the school is wealthy enough to provide free laptops, then you're right they're going to go for the cheapest option. But if the school expects the parents to provide laptops, then the parents are more likely to choose this.

NietTim 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So what segment does it target in your opinion? The "surface" market is minuscule and compared to the edu market irrelevant, the "vendor lock in" angle with the google logins can easily change over night as it did with microsoft.

runjake 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> So what segment does it target in your opinion?

- Low end consumer

- College students

- People who have a desktop computer, but want a cheap portable for on-the-go.

> The "surface" market is minuscule

Probably so, but then again, I see a lot of Surface devices out and about and they are fairly popular with non-teacher education staff. While they aren't competing with Chromebooks or Apple on volume, I'd bet they're doing well.

6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
blactuary 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not having to make a Google login would be a big benefit to me. Google is getting their data early

briandear 18 minutes ago | parent [-]

Completely agree. I hate kids being stuck in a Google ecosystem. Apple’s classroom app is really good.

harshaw 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

somewhat off topic, but I really am not sure that adding chromebooks to every school has made education better. hard to block youtube when they bring these home (I know you can, but the average person can't).

jonplackett 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How long do those chrome books last though?

I reckon even an iPhone pro is better value than an average android phone. Same with iPad vs Android tablet.

Because they last 3 possibly 4 times longer. A decent Apple laptop purchased 4 years ago is still basically a top notch laptop. Build quality is amazing. Resale value is still very high.

magnio 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Because they last 3 possibly 4 times longer.

An iPhone Pro is 3 times more expensive than an average Android phone too. If you buy Android flagships after 2022, they also last 4-6 years.

alwillis 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> If you buy Android flagships after 2022, they also last 4-6 years.

The hardware lasts but they usually stop getting software updates after a few years, especially if they're not high-end models.

Last month, Apple released an update for the iPhone 8 and iPhone X [1]. The iPhone 8 was released September 2017. I seriously doubt 9-year old Android phones, even flagship models, are still getting software updates.

[1]: https://www.macrumors.com/2026/02/02/apple-releases-ios-16-7...

orthogonal_cube 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Physical durability will play a major factor here. If schools are expected to provide the Chromebooks then it will all boil down to the level of abuse/neglect the hardware can handle.

Replacing a low-resale value $250 Chromebook that is equally sensitive to being dropped, exposed to liquids, or having debris get into hinges and keyboards will be heavily favored over a $500 MB Neo. The Neo’s processor and storage may have better lifetime but it doesn’t mean anything if the equipment ends up bricked.

Schools in affluent areas may favor these for reasons you state. Judging on how students treat textbooks though should demonstrate how short the lifespan would turn out to be.

al_borland an hour ago | parent [-]

Framework might be appealing as well. Being able to have parts on hand that can easily be swapped out sounds a lot better/easier than dealing Apple repair practices. The Framework Laptop 12[0] starts at $549 and has touchscreen/pen options. But that price goes up to $799 to have it pre-built with an OS on it, which schools would want, unless building your laptop and installing the OS is part of the curriculum. I wonder if having the kids do this would make them take better care of it, because they had a hand it making it?

[0] https://frame.work/laptop12

bob1029 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> This doesn't even factor in MDM and app cost comparisons.

I would argue that Apple has a better MDM ecosystem if there are any kind of policy constraints beyond one laptop per child.

LunaSea 5 hours ago | parent [-]

There used to be FleetSmith which was a very simple Apple-only MDM system.

It was great, very simple to use but still had all the features you needed.

They were acquired by Apple who then promptly killed the product.

newsclues 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not every school is cash limited. Many schools have lots of money to invest in technology.

Some schools will gladly pay more.

runjake 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Truth. I've seen some of them with carts full of MacBook Pros. But these schools are a small fraction of the overall population.

It should also be noted that Washington state schools are still generally heavily Microsoft and Windows, despite Google's dominance.

newsclues 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Similar to how MS helps their local schools, I think Apple does for schools in California.

jen20 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not to disagree too much with your assessment, one point stands out:

> The Neo costs $499 per unit for schools.

We don't actually know this. It does at the level individual student purchasing themselves, but I'd imagine there is a substantial bulk discount for educational establishments. That is not a new trend for Apple, it dates back to the Apple II.

runjake 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I do because we asked Apple about Neo pricing.

We do because this is historically the norm. Schools pay roughly the same as the "college student" pricing, aside from the occasional deals they toss us.

ben7799 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The only problem with Chromebooks and the whole Google educational toolchain is it ruins school!

My kid is on it, every kid hates it and every teacher hates it. You just can't argue with the pricing. I'm amazed at how bad everything seems to old fashioned paper text books.

Every time I help my son I'm amazed how bad it all is. Horrible tiny screen that looks like is from 2000 and then the software is all designed for some Googler who has 2x 30" 5k displays. The usability is atrocious.

raw_anon_1111 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Chromebooks are the SaaS of hardware where the user is not the buyer. No one says “I would love to have a Chromebook at home” any more than they desire to run Salesforce at home.

nolist_policy 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A Chromebook at the same price point will get you similar if not better specs, 14" 16:10 FHD IPS display, convertible with touchscreen and pen input, backlit keyboard and 10h+ battery runtime.

GeekyBear 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The build quality of a $300 Chromebook is laughable.

intrasight 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

threatofrain 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is not competing against Chromebooks, which have very little reach outside of institutions. The Macbook Neo will likely have very widespread appeal for anyone looking for what used to be a netbook.

jimbokun 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It could compete well in both. Looks like Apple has a product that competes with Chromebooks on price and competes with Surface on performance at the same time. At least close enough on both counts to create headaches for anyone trying to sell either.

free_bip 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm not sure that's true given that Chromebooks can be had for one third the price.

zitterbewegung 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

At this point the Macbook Neo is in competition with Chromebooks, Microsoft and the third party market for older Macbook Airs with M1s

adrr 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It needs a touch screen for elementary schools kids. Fine for older kids.

post-it 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We started using computers with keyboards in class in grade 2-3.

rbanffy 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Current school laptops also have touchscreens for drawing and other activities. It’s a cheap feature.

mbreese 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Pen input is the one factor that forced one of my kids to a Windows laptop for school (a Surface Pro). It was a required feature for his school. Seeing how much he uses it for note taking, I get it. So yes, drawing is a key feature for schools.

Another school uses iPads with keyboards for the same purpose, so I'm not sure where the school market is for these. Maybe only older kids, but a lot of edu-tech is expecting some kind of touch/pen input.

sreekanth67 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

wow. are elementary school kids using chromebooks? my kids is in pre-K this year. i dont know about the elementary school chromebook thing.

adrr 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They take standardized tests on it. Questions have a button to speak the question. Same with answers.

chrisgeleven 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes, my kids all started using one in Kindergarten, although it took to 4th grade before my oldest started bringing home one every night.

rbanffy 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It might be aimed at Chromebooks, but it’s also a low-end Surface killer.

The only thing I don’t like is the 8GB memory. And it could have the black keyboards of the other Apples.

nobody_r_knows 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

NearAP 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think the 2 laptops you mentioned are targeting different markets.

The Surface Laptop you linked to is - 16GB of RAM and 512GB of Storage (no 8GB of RAM option)

The $599 Mac Neo is 8GB of RAM and 256GB of Storage. It doesn't have a 16GB RAM option but a 512GB storage option is $699.

8GB RAM seems to me to be targeting folks who don't run a lot of local apps or multiple big apps

kettlecorn 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

At this point I think few people really will care about that spec difference.

The accumulated brand trust of Apple, and the negative brand trust of Microsoft outweighs the numbers.

Even many technically savvy people believe Apple can deliver a higher quality computing experience with 8GB of RAM than Microsoft can with 16GB, and they're often correct.

thewebguyd 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> The accumulated brand trust of Apple

This is an important thing to Apple, and Apple users know it. They would not have put out this macbook if it was going to be a subpar experience. Microsoft has no such qualms about OEMs shipping an underspecced disaster of a beater laptop (see Vista).

You can (generally) but any Apple product and know you are going to get something quality and a good experience, even from the base/budget models. They don't really have any "bad" products.

leptons 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>They would not have put out this macbook if it was going to be a subpar experience.

"You're holding it wrong" - Steve Jobs

Apple has put out plenty of subpar experiences in the past, and there's no reason they wouldn't do it in the future.

thewebguyd 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

And despite antenna gate, the iPhone 4 was still the best smartphone of that year and leaps ahead of it's closest competition (the Galaxy S), and remained the #1 best selling smartphone at year after launch

leptons 36 minutes ago | parent [-]

You can only buy hardware that runs Apple software from Apple, but Android mobile devices far outsell Apple devices and always have. Apple is and always has been a minority player in the overall smartphone market (and desktop/laptop as well).

Globally, Android has had about 70% to 75% market share, and Apple has always had a much smaller slice of the total. iPhones are not as popular as you seem to think they are. You don't have to believe me, the data proves it:

https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/mobile/worldwide/...

kettlecorn 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Apple certainly puts out experiences that leave much to be improved but to be pedantic the word 'subpar' implies below the 'par'. If 'par' is set by Microsoft then Apple easily clears it.

Nowadays Chromebooks offer more design competition for Apple, and even historically Linux distros have had more ideas for Apple to learn from than Microsoft.

alwillis 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> "You're holding it wrong" - Steve Jobs

> Apple has put out plenty of subpar experiences in the past, and there's no reason they wouldn't do it in the future.

Come on—that was 16 years ago! Y'all gotta let some things go after a while.

leptons an hour ago | parent [-]

Okay... how about, Apple put the charging port on a wireless mouse on the bottom of the mouse.

I could go on, and on...

alwillis 8 minutes ago | parent [-]

As they say "past performance does not guarantee future results".

That version of the Magic Mouse is also over 10 years old…

1attice 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The Vision Pro and butterfly keyboard would like a word

thewebguyd 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Fair enough, although I wouldn't call the vision pro a bad product necessarily, it's just too expensive for what it is.

1attice 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, you see them on the subway all the time

pjmlp 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

In laptop keyboards, UI refactorings, or Siri?

Where is exactly the premium quality?

kettlecorn 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Apple's UX quality, design focus, and respect for its customers is higher quality and more consistent than Microsoft's.

Apple is also imperfect and I feel leaves tremendous room to do better, but they are still much better than Microsoft.

Take one topic: UI refactorings. Apple has rolled out disruptive UI refactorings but they've also rolled them out consistently across products and throughout their software.

Microsoft did not have the internal leadership discipline or commitment to design to ever get their products in alignment around a design language. It is common on Windows that the included software all uses different design toolkits and design paradigms. For years Windows was infamous for having multiple ways to configure even common settings, often requiring falling back to the old version, because they were not able to ship a unified UX.

Microsoft routinely has 'UX design scandals' of various sorts with dark patterns forcing Microsoft's preference on users. Apple has those as well, but far less often.

akdev1l 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

MacOS is crazy efficient and can overcommit quite a lot.

I used an M1 Pro for a couple years to work. 8GB of ram but routinely using 12GB including swap.

Now, I couldn’t keep slack and outlook open so there were limitations but I was able to work. People are underestimating the usefulness of 8GB of RAM.

I guess it is also worth saying that I do my work by connecting to a remote server where I do the actual development and everything else. The Mac itself being a web browser and ssh machine

MrDrMcCoy 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Not being able to keep Slack and Outlook open at the same time seems like a pretty significant productivity hindrance to me. 8GB RAM is truly pathetic in 2022.

deepthaw 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I’m freaking out the equivalent of mutt and irc require more than 8GB of RAM to run simultaneously.

What are modern operating systems and applications doing?

astrange 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can post images in Slack and use text formatting. Those are things that use memory.

jshen 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Gifs. I'm only half joking.

briandear 13 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not having to use outlook is a feature not a bug.

akdev1l 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I used outlook on the browser when needed and slack was open most of the time

I also had around 200 tabs open on the regular

Now I wouldn’t tell you it was a good experience because it wasn’t. But it was usable even pushing the hardware to the max.

Kirby64 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Children don't have Slack and Outlook open. Gmail in a web browser and Discord, maybe. My old M1 Air works just fine for productivity workloads, and has for years.

vunderba 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Is Slack that much worse of a memory hog than Discord? Aren’t they both built on electron?

alwillis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can make a pretty good electron app or one that kinda sucks. Slack is in the latter category.

vunderba an hour ago | parent [-]

VS Code (or rather VSCodium in my case) is also electron based but it's been relatively snappy in my experience - though I don't use a lot of third party plugins.

alwillis 16 minutes ago | parent [-]

Say what you will about Microsoft but the performance of VS Code is really good.

Kirby64 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Not sure about slack vs discord, but browser Gmail is almost certainly less memory hungry than Outlook. And that’s probably enough of a difference by itself.

Schiendelman 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Do you actually have a problem with Slack and Outlook open at the same time on an Apple Silicon Mac with 8GB of memory? Or are you assuming?

MrDrMcCoy 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I was replying to someone that made that claim from apparent experience.

Izikiel43 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Not being able to keep Slack and Outlook open at the same time seems like a pretty significant productivity hindrance to me. 8GB RAM is truly pathetic in 2022.

I read this as how bad software quality has gone down, that a mail program and a chat program don't fit in 8GB of RAM.

carlosjobim 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nobody except people on HN cares about RAM. People care about what you can actually do with the machine. The spec numbers are nothing more than numbers when a computer never works as it is supposed to. It's like having a 500HP car, but it can actually not drive.

prmph 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Indeed, 8gb is plenty, even for serious work and coding, if you use the machine well.

If you think getting more and more RAM solves every performance problem, I've got news for you: People are having beachballs on machines with 32GB and more.

garbageman 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I agree generally that on Mac you can 'get by' with 8gb and for the target audience on this, and how they'll likely use it - it's totally acceptable.

But if it's for serious work, this is not the device. 'Managing' the software to 'use the machine well' to get serious work done is unacceptable in 2026. It needs to just work and disappear into the background. I have enough to think about and micro managing the software running is out of the question.

prmph 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> 'Managing' the software to 'use the machine well' to get serious work done is unacceptable in 2026

I agree, I just don't think the rush to get more and more RAM and storage is the root of the problem.

Why on earth does a browser need more than 10 GB to display web pages?? Why does macOS keep piling/hiding trash that should be deleted in "System Data"?

And, if you need to keep device backups, put them on an external drive; that's what those things are for.

astrange 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Web pages are very complicated and there's no pressure on people to make less complicated ones, nor is there any way there could be pressure on them.

Images, complicated CSS, JavaScript ads, they can all use lots of memory!

carlosjobim 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It depends on how you define "serious work". Is it to get the best results possible, or is it to tax a computer as much as possible? Programmers would usually answer the latter, while users would answer the former.

That's why programmers put their stuff into Kubernetes which go into virtual machines, which go into eleven layers of javascript abstraction which go into twelve thousand node packages, which go into something else to end up with something with very basic functionality, which usually doesn't work very well.

Other pro computer users are focused on the results, so they use professional office software, calendars, communications, photo and video editing and effects, photo-realistic 3D editors, studio level audio and music editing software. All which lives perfectly fine on 8GB of RAM.

vunderba 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As always - it depends on the kind of ostensible "serious work" you do.

I've got 32GB and often work with legacy .NET Winform/WPF applications on a Macbook. That means spinning up a Windows 11 ARM distro virtual machine and running Microsoft Visual Studio. The VM has 8GB of ram allocated to it, and based on qemu-system memory pressure, it hovers around ~4-6GB of that.

I also do a lot of colorgrading and video editing with longform 4K videos using Davinci Resolve - scrubbing in an uncompressed format would absolutely thrash the hell out of your swap with only 8GB.

AlotOfReading 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Add much as I'd like to be more efficient, modern toolchains absolutely need these kinds of numbers for big projects. My 48GB system will OOM trying to link clang unless I'm extremely careful. The 64GB system is a bit more forgiving, but I still have to go for lunch while it's working.

Sure, might be ambitious to do that sort of workload on a budget conscious laptop, but it'd be nice y'know?

jshen 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If you're trying to link clang, this laptop is not for you. It's for people that would consider a chromebook for their use case.

prmph 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Usually the problem then is more fundamental.

Rust exists. If you insist on using (or need to use) languages with horrendous build architectures like C++, then you probably need a proper build server then anyways.

I don't have XCode on my Macbook and have resolved not to do iOS development any time soon (although ideally I'd have wanted to dabble in it sometimes), because I've accepted I don't want to run the rat race of always needing beefier and beefier machines to keep up with Apple's bad habit of bloating it up for each version up for no good reason.

I don't run local LLMs on my machine, since even with 100s of GB of RAM, I hear the performance you can expect is abysmal.

I think it is a good idea to put pressure on hardware and software vendors to make their products more efficient.

AlotOfReading 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Rust has similar issues with memory usage during linking as C++.

I can use a build server when I want one, but that's not always appropriate. Local builds are useful.

restes 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>People are having beachballs on machines with 32GB and more.

Well, sure, because the beachball means the main thread is hung, and that can happen for many reasons unrelated to memory pressure.

Bluecobra 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I literally just ran into this myself with my spouse. She is ready to upgrade her M1 MacBook Air and thinks she doesn’t need more RAM because everything is “in the cloud”. Hopefully 8GB is enough RAM for the next 5 years or so...

benterix 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Nobody except people on HN cares about RAM.

They might not care but they do call us saying "Oh you are good with computers, why is my computer so slow?"

carlosjobim 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Tell them to buy a Mac and they'll never have to call for tech support again.

abrouwers 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

My spouse bought a mac and asks me (mostly a linux user, and I'm happy to help) for support somewhat regularly (mostly recently, for a tahoe upgrade). It's not the golden unicorn people paint it to be. 8gb is insane in 2026.

swiftcoder 5 hours ago | parent [-]

It may not be a golden unicorn, but I find it is quite a lot better than providing support for the Windows laptops they used to buy from random department stores on rock-bottom sales... Nothing quite like a $200 PC laptop stocked with OEM bloatware

deepthaw 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Until 1/3 of your hard drive space is taken up by weird cache stuff that MacOS doesn’t explain nor offer a straightforward way to clean up.

astrange 2 hours ago | parent [-]

If it's cache it gets automatically deleted. If it doesn't get automatically deleted it's not a cache and is a bug.

olnluis 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I like my MB Pro but it has serious audio and external display issues. I've had to remove spotlight indexing to prevent obscure OOM issues. One time I woke up to open my laptop and find it's screen cracked for no apparent reason. Since I couldn't prove it wasn't my fault I was charged for the repair anyway and I'm grateful to myself that I had AC+ because I might have as well just bought another laptop if not. At the end of the day, it's still just a computer.

spiderfarmer 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is it hard for you to imagine that people who'll buy the Neo don't care about specs at all?

I mean, look at the colors!

wilsonnb3 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The surface laptop is a competitor to the MacBook Air, the cheaper Surface Laptop Go was the low cost attempt from MS.

Also, there are plenty of good laptops from HP, Asus, Lenovo, Acer, and others, the market is not that dire.

taftster 6 hours ago | parent [-]

"good laptops" yes. But I haven't seen a "great" one in a very long time. The Windows market is asleep at the wheel and a copilot button is not going to resuscitate it.

I think the Surface is as close to great as you can get. I'm not saying that I know the whole market of laptops, you probably know better. But the Surface is pretty good, which is weird because it seems like Microsoft isn't really focusing on it or even backing away from it.

I agree with the parent, that Macbooks are way ahead in terms of usability, polish and charm for a laptop. And the performance is outright stellar.

taftster 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Other than Microsoft nobody even makes decent laptops in the Windows world.

I completely agree. I actually quit like and get along with my Surface Laptop. It's a really nice computer overall, worthy. It's the closest you get to the same polish and usability that Apple has in their macbooks.

I absolutely love my M4 macbook pro, it's definitely the best laptop I've ever owned. I had an older macbook pro that I kept way past its lifetime too.

OkayPhysicist 6 hours ago | parent [-]

The Surface is garbage. My last work-issued one caught fire.

I've never had any complaint's about Asus' laptops, though I've only used their Zenbook and Zephyrus lines.

jtbigwoo 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think the problem is that Microsoft's hardware quality is super inconsistent. We had a ton of employees using Surface laptops and tablets at my previous company, particularly sales and support. The company stopped buying them after a few years because the first year failure rate was almost 15%. However, the folks that had the good ones often kept them for 5 years or more.

carefree-bob 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

woah, how did it catch on fire? I want to hear this.

OkayPhysicist 37 minutes ago | parent [-]

Don't know. Plugged it in one morning, and it wasn't turning on. So I tried detaching it from its base because that had been a problem before, but it was dead, so you needed to find the little manual release thing that's inside one of the vents, which I didn't have a tool for, so I gave up on that. Then I turned to ask a coworker to try their charging cord (as mine had to be replaced once after it failed, and I assumed the same thing had happened again), and by the time I got back to my desk a small whisp of smoke was rising from the keyboard, which is strange, because to my understanding that's not where the computer bits are in that laptop.

So I unplugged it, at which point I noticed the smoke was increasing. So we doused it in CO2 (maybe N2, idk, some cheap gas we had lying around for the wetlab), pried the computer part off of the base, and then IT handled sending it back to M$.

manwe150 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don’t think it is just a hardware issue: Windows still just maps all movements and scrolling directly into pixels and lines. Most programs just slightly blur the viewport when scrolling to hide the latency, but that just adds even more latency. You can disable the scroll delay in the web browser settings, but not any of the new applications, like the new notepad

Whereas Apple uses smooth acceleration curves

cmovq 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> it uses 150% scaling (as opposed to the ideal 200%) which means you have subtle display artifacts

200% is ideal but scaling on Windows has gotten really good. I use 150% on a 4K monitor and it works well.

lionkor 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Not if you move windows between screens with different scaling, or launch apps that don't support the scaling stuff out of the box, or launch apps via X11 forwarding in WSL.

v1ne 6 hours ago | parent [-]

All of this works much worse on macOS: Scaling sucks, as it's integer-upscaled rendering + fractional downscaling in a shader. Windows can't span screens either.

On Windows, the window will adapt as you move its center of gravity across the edge of the screens. Sure, could be better than at the moment where the window is the wrong size, but it would always be blurry.

timpera 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The ARM64 Surface Laptop is great and definitely matches the MacBook Air's quality, but yeah, there's no way it is competitive with the new Neo offering from Apple at current prices.

I hope this leads to a general decrease in price for laptops, but with the RAM crunch I don't see that happening…

jjtheblunt 7 hours ago | parent [-]

the surface laptop has an excellent screen (2880x1920 i believe), and the macbook neo is lower resolution than apple's made in years, however.

lateforwork 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not true.

13-inch Surface Resolution: 1920 x 1280 (178 PPI)

15-inch Surface Resolution: 2496 x 1664 (201 PPI)

See https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-lapt...

Compare that to my Lenovo Yoga 14-inch: 2944 x 1840 (239 PPI)

jjtheblunt 3 hours ago | parent [-]

ahhh....good catch. i used the wrong name: i meant surface pro 13, which has the detachable keyboard. yeah, it's odd that the surface laptops are lower res.

alwillis 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Neo’s display is 219 pixels per inch, which is virtually the same as the Air’s 224 ppi.

jjtheblunt 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

too late to edit: i was thinking surface pro (the detachable keyboard) not surface laptop with attached keyboard and weirdly low res screens, compared to the surface pro series.

dmonitor 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What about color quality? I've used high resolution laptops with shitty washed out colors, but one thing I've always appreciated about Apple's displays is their vibrance.

SunshineTheCat 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is really well put.

It's interesting, for years I have been trying to make my iPad a nice, slim laptop I could bring with me everywhere for lighter/coding specific tasks. I've gone through several keyboards trying to make this work. It never has.

Now with this laptop, I can do exactly this, while being cheaper than what I've been attempting to do with an iPad.

mikepurvis 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I have the Lenovo X1 and I'm very happy with it, though obviously that's in a pretty different price category than the Yoga, Surface, or Macbook Neo.

On the other hand, more money doesn't always mean better computer. I had a Dell XPS 9570 at a previous gig that had a lot of issues: coil whine, bad camera placement, terrible thermals, etc.

raydev 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think you're undervaluing touchscreen capability, which even the cheapest laptops offer now. Kids and non-tech folks have come to expect it by default.

Now that Apple is attempting to compete in this space, they'll have to pitch these folks on what macOS without touch capability offers over Windows with touch capability.

Maybe it will still sell well enough, maybe people aren't that stuck on touchscreens.

internet2000 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not just Microsoft. Dell and HP must be having emergency meetings right about now...

lateforwork 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Their challenge is, how do we halve the price and yet deliver twice the quality? I think they are going to realize they can't. Some of them will leave the market.

joe_mamba 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Dell has 50% more market share than Apple and HP 2x Apple's market share in the PC space. I doubt they'll be exiting the market because Apple launched a cheap laptop with 8gb of ram and using USB 2.0 ports. Most corporations are still tied to Windows apps and the MS ecosystem in general.

alwillis 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> cheap laptop with 8gb of ram and using USB 2.0 ports.

A nitpick: there are two USB ports, one of them is a 10GB/s USB 3 port.

joe_mamba 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Both of which look identical with no obvious markings which is which. I'm sure this will generate no confusion amongst consumers who will have no issues whatsoever with this. /s

"you're plugging it wrong" will become the new version of the classic "You're holding it wrong"

dmos62 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'll just chime in to say that not everyone cares about the features you mentioned that much. Keyboard, touchpad, looks are the last things I think about when comparing laptops. Not to lessen your preferences, just to point out that there's a variety of viewpoints.

widowlark 5 hours ago | parent [-]

What features do matter to you?

dmos62 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Last time I was shopping for a laptop, I needed battery life, low glare, high screen brightness, rugedness was a plus. Cheapness is a good proxy for rugedness. Being able to upgrade/repair components is generally something I value highly too. Something that's made to be maintained, meaning opened, disassembled (and reassembled!), feels good to me.

widowlark 4 hours ago | parent [-]

What options do you see available on the market today that meet those needs? I agree that all of those are super nice to have

dmos62 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Used thinkpads and dell latitudes, battery and brightness aren't always what I'd like though. Frameworks and similar sound nice, but can't bring myself to pay the premium.

What features matter to you?

general_reveal 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sometimes I wish I could just use any laptop and Remote Desktop into my gaming rig which is awesome. Then I can have whatever form factor laptop I want, but the problem is I think the latency still sucks (maybe not?) on stuff like Parsec even locally.

6jQhWNYh 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The latency is acceptable. I host a remote gaming rig accessed through Parsec, the extra encoding/decoding latency is minimal. Distance has the largest effect, I found that over roughly 1,000 km my total latency is about 30 ms, perfectly playable for all but the most competitive FPS.

pinkgolem 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Nah locally is fine, if you have a good 6ghz coverage, but that means a hotspot in every second room

general_reveal 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I don’t have WiFi 6E, just 6 (5ghz). If the input latency is imperceptible for productivity work, and the resolution matches my laptop resolution without pixelation, then why the heck am I not streaming my powerhouse main pc?

Weekend project.

reactordev 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I agree. I read this and immediately thought to myself: The gloves are off.

The price point, the capability, the only thing stopping Apple at this point is the MDM stuff integrating it with other identity providers but its ahead of where it used to be.

thewebguyd 4 hours ago | parent [-]

The MDM stuff is there now, and platform SSO works pretty well, at least with Entra and Okta (the only two I have experience with). Both JamF and InTune support it, I'm sure all the other MDMs do as well.

The only time macs can be a bit of a headache is if you are still using all on-prem AD & group policy and trying to force them into that environment via joining the mac to AD.

reactordev 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Microsoft is forcing everyone onto Azure AD or whatever so that should fix that.

Last time I dealt with Apple MDM was integrating it with on-prem AD and it was a pain. I know it’s better now because last few “gigs” have used it and it’s been pretty seamless with Microsoft Authenticator for Teams. (Ugh!)

kccqzy 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> it uses 150% scaling (as opposed to the ideal 200%) which means you have subtle display artifacts

I agree with you, but I’m afraid Apple doesn’t agree with us. The recent MacBooks do not use 200% scaling out of the box anymore. It is a setting that only nerds use. I have no reason to believe that out of the box the default settings on this MacBook Neo will use 200% scaling either.

manwe150 7 hours ago | parent [-]

I think macOS applications feel like they have mostly updated to use the native resolution, so arbitrary scaling works great now. My comparative experience with a new Windows laptop is how I remember macOS felt when they first made high density screens many years ago: lots of render bugs all over, and every program has to be re-opened when I plug in an external screen to be usable at the new resolution

kccqzy 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Most macOS applications now support rendering at 1x and 2x. And arbitrary scaling is done by the OS not by apps.

rbanffy 7 hours ago | parent [-]

That’s the ideal. Apps shouldn’t concern themselves with pixels. It’s the OSs job to know the hardware the machine uses.

odo1242 6 hours ago | parent [-]

This leads to visible moire patterns at non-integer scalings, though

fluidcruft 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Surface has 16GB of RAM vs 8GB on the Neo (Windows definitely eats RAM though so maybe that's par).

xattt 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I am typing this on an Lenovo Yoga, it has decent screen and keyboard, but the touchpad is horrible.

Can we talk about laptops that you can’t carry by the edge where your palm rests because it flexes the frame and registers it as a mouse down event …

caycep 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

PC to me is always best as a itx minitower form factor.

Someone 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> The best laptop is now significantly cheaper than the horrible ones.

Possibly, but I would wait for reviews to make that call. The hardware is slower than other MacBooks; memory may be slower, too, and other hardware may be slightly worse in quality.

Eric_WVGG 6 hours ago | parent [-]

“hardware is slower” single core is significantly faster than the M2 Ultra chip. And when you're browsing the web, single core is all that matters.

sigzero 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For a casual computer at home, I'd get one. Everything I do is practically web based anyway.

4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
ViktorRay 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Some of the new HP laptops are pretty well designed and have reasonable prices.

karmakaze 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That Surface has 16GB RAM though.

> Your new MacBook Neo. Just the way you want it[sic]. 13-inch MacBook Neo in Indigo A18 Pro, 6-core CPU, 5-core GPU, 16-core Neural Engine Apple Intelligence Footnote ※

    8GB unified memory
    256GB SSD storage
    U.S. English Magic Keyboard with Lock Key
    20W USB‑C Power Adapter

    Two USB-C ports, 3.5 mm headphone jack
    Support for one external display
8 GB unified memory is brand-new e-waste today. macOS 26 makes it even worse.
alwillis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> 8 GB unified memory is brand-new e-waste today. macOS 26 makes it even worse.

One reason Apple can get away with 8 GB of RAM is their SoC does realtime compression of data in RAM and they use high bandwidth memory; the A19 Pro RAM bandwidth is 60 GB/s. This enables them to treat the SSD like an L3 cache.

It's nearly 5 years since the M1 was released; I suspect Apple has gotten really good with their RAM > compression > SSD system since then.

stanmancan 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm going to give Apple the benefit of the doubt here until proven otherwise. I can't see them releasing something with a terrible user experience as it would cause a lot of reputational harm.

12_throw_away 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> I can't see them releasing something with a terrible user experience

I see you haven't upgraded to Tahoe yet!

skybrian 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't know what apps you run, but I'm typing this from an M2 Mac with 8 GB, running Tahoe. Performance is fine. It's always been fine.

ge96 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Dell XPS 13 plus 9320 looks pretty good design wise

lateforwork 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It has an unusual keyboard. Function should come before form [1]. This unconventional design makes it harder for touch typists to locate keys by feel.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_follows_function

jstimpfle 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> which means you have subtle display artifacts.

No. 150÷ just means 96dpi * 1.5

lateforwork 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

At 150% scaling, one logical pixel maps to 1.5 physical pixels. When a 1px grid line is drawn, the renderer cannot light exactly 1.5 pixels, so it distributes the color across adjacent pixels using anti-aliasing. Depending on where the line falls relative to device-pixel boundaries, one pixel may be fully colored and the next partially colored, or vice versa. This shifts the perceived center of the line slightly. In a repeating grid, these fractional shifts accumulate, making the gaps between lines appear uneven or "vibrating."

Chromium often avoids this by rendering 1px borders as hairlines that snap to a single device pixel, even when a CSS pixel corresponds to 1.5 device pixels at 150% scaling. This keeps lines crisp, but it also means the border remains about one device pixel thick, making it appear slightly thinner relative to the surrounding content.

For some people such artifacts are not noticeable for others they are.

lateforwork 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Here are some links that explain the issue:

https://patrickbrosset.com/articles/2024-06-21-invasion-of-t...

https://flutterawesome.com/sharp-looking-flutter-application...

https://tanalin.com/en/articles/integer-scaling/

ElijahLynn 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Doesn't the surface have a touch screen?

I don't really see how it's a competitor if it doesn't have a touch screen.

GenerWork 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In the year that I had a Surface, I can count on 2 hands the number of times that I used the touch screen. Out of all those times that I used touch screen functionality, the majority of the times were done inadvertently when I was trying to get something off the screen. I'm willing to bet a lot of people won't/don't care about the touch screen, they just want something cheap.

garbageman 5 hours ago | parent [-]

100%

All the touch screen does is make it top heavy and the hinge less effective at damping the movement.

f33d5173 5 hours ago | parent [-]

A touch screen by itself doesn't noticably increase the weight of the screen. It's only when you put everything else up there that it becomes heavier.

lateforwork 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I have a Windows laptop with a touch screen. The only time I touch the screen is when I take a screenshot using the Snipping Tool and want to circle something.

internet2000 5 hours ago | parent [-]

So you do use it.

lateforwork 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes... barely. I wouldn't miss it if I didn't have it.

heraldgeezer 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>Other than Microsoft nobody even makes decent laptops in the Windows world

Thinkpads.

Or in general any business laptop, like HP Elitebook or Dell Presicion.

But they are not cheap at all haha

If you want performace get a desktop!

post-it 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> If you want performace get a desktop!

Or a MacBook, which is part OP's point. Apple is delivering quality at price points that Windows OEMs aren't (which is sort of the opposite of the phone world).

thefounder 6 hours ago | parent [-]

8gb of ram is not performance.

ducktastic 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Maybe I am in the minority but MacOS always feels so bloated and heavy to me.

NetMageSCW 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Never used an 8GB Mac I see.

akdev1l 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A decked out Mac mini is actually a beast for its size

rbanffy 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Thinkpads are tanks, but most of the time you’d be perfectly well served by a BMW series 3.

heraldgeezer 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Ts-series are nice and slim. X1 too.

Only P-series are workstations.

I meant for build quality.

dartharva 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The experience I have had with Thinkpads, both current-gen and old during my childhood, did not warm me up to the line. They are not particularly better in feel, thermals and screen quality against its cheaper alternatives including those from Lenovo themselves. The only good thing was its keyboard, but then most Lenovo laptops in general have good keyboards. Its popular acclaim is weird to me.

locusofself 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

MSFT up 1.84% today..

pjmlp 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not really, because Surface isn't what most folks buying PCs get.

And those prices don't compute in many European countries, Africa, and most likely other regions as well.

blazarquasar 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Surface Laptop is 1099€ vs 699€ for the Macbook Neo in Germany.

Macbook Neo is also 219ppi vs Surface Laptop at 178ppi. We’ll see about performance, but i’d expect the macbook to be on par or better.

pjmlp 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Except most Germans don't buy Surface Laptops, and there are much cheaper options with 8 GB, naturally they lack a glowing apple to show off at Starbucks.

It is also actually 800 euro if you want a proper SSD storage in 2026.

And as mentioed, get out of German economy, into the southern and eastern countries, or over the Mediterrean to see who gets a Neo outside the well in life families, or maybe bundled with a cable TV contract bound to five years.

rbanffy 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> they lack a glowing apple to show off at Starbucks.

If your MacBook has a glowing apple, you might be running Snow Leopard. You need to upgrade like now.

rescbr 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I miss the glowing apple on my white polycarbonate MacBook. What I don't miss is the shitty Intel GMA X3100 iGPU and Apple not releasing a 64 bit driver for it.

Should have spent the money on a MacBook Pro with a real GPU, I would have used that computer way longer than I had.

pjmlp 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Thankfully I don't own any, I rather have computers with replaceable parts, more environment friendly, thus not something I need to worry about.

NetMageSCW 5 hours ago | parent [-]

what computers are you buying that are more environmentally friendly? The MacBook Neo is 60% from recycled materials and Apple offers free recycling for all their products.

How do you recycle your old parts?

rescbr 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> what computers are you buying that are more environmentally friendly?

Any computer that you can upgrade its parts? SSD, RAM, Wifi cards, etc.

The only parts that wear out on a modern laptop are the SSD and the battery. If I replace those, I can use it basically indefinitely, paying the penalty on performance and energy consumption depending on how old the CPU is.

Why would I throw out (or recycle) a perfectly good computer if I could simply fix or upgrade it? If you're not reusing it, then you could pass it down to somebody who would use it.

20+ year old computers are e-waste at this point thanks to software bloating and lack of hardware acceleration for at least h.264.

15 year old computers are very usable, but unfortunately most use SATA for storage which is definitely not optimal for SSDs.

10 year old computers are from when PC tech plateaued, for most use cases the difference in performance is imperceptible, and maybe you lose power efficiency.

recordlabel 3 hours ago | parent [-]

nowadays macbook batteries aren't something i'd call "easy to replace" but it's not something a typical repair shop or meticulous individual wouldn't be able to do – most beater windows laptops don't have user-replacable batteries either fwiw

if the ssd is bricked you do need to replace the whole "logic board" tho which sucks

pjmlp 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Thinkpads with replaceable components and PC desktops.

antfarm 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Apple logo is on the wrong side of the screen to be concerned about. Apple's OS and user experience is miles ahead of the competition and so are the displays they use.

margorczynski 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The Mac OS is the thing that keeps me away from those computers. I really don't like when a piece of software tries to treat me like I have some kind of brain injury and needs to "help" me at every point.

pjmlp 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Indeed nothing beats the Tahoe experience.

wolvesechoes 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, this should convince people who cannot afford to pay for Apple brand to buy it.

antfarm 5 hours ago | parent [-]

The post that I commented on was arguing that what sets the Mac apart from other options with 8 GB RAM, and what makes them more expensive, is that they are seen as a status symbol. I made a point against that mentioning two areas in which Macs are truly superior.

What exactly is your point?

klardotsh 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

To each their own. The OS is easily one of the most frustrating I’ve ever been required to use. It does some things very well, but many things absolutely infuriatingly.

Now, yes, almost everything about Apple’s hardware UX is a light year ahead of most competitors. That’s been true for ages.

achenet 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I disagree about Apple's OS and UI, I prefer the user experience of Linux :)

With a distro like Linux Mint or Ubuntu everything basically "just works", and you have much more freedom with how you setup your computer. Plus, while Apple is generally better about not bloaring their OS with bothersome corporate BS ("log into your Windows account! Sign up for OneDrive! AI in your email!") then Microsoft, they're not exactly perfect.

internet2000 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Glowing logo for Starbucks dig? What year is it?

pjmlp 3 hours ago | parent [-]

2026

Schiendelman 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"With 8GB". 8GB on Apple Silicon acts more like 16GB on a PC.

pjmlp 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Depends on how many ChromeOS Platform apps you have running.

5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
rk06 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

all apple needs, to kill surface laptops entirely, is to enable windows to run on m series laptops without issues.

I don't know why the downvotes, maybe someone can chime in if there is more to surface laptop? because i am using one laptop, and much prefer to use windows on M4 macbook pro instead.

rbanffy 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I’m not sure that many people want Windows badly enough they would get an Apple device and remove the original OS so they could run Windows.

From my personal experience, Widows users in general don’t mind Windows, but, definitely, nobody I have ever met finds it more desirable than macOS.

fidotron 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The games industry remains a hotbed of people that vehemently hate Apple, even those that have never touched a Mac.

Part of it historically was a sort of Visual Studio induced Stockholm Syndrome, where for a long time if you were doing C++ work that was the only sane way to go.

There are some companies that even filter potential employees on this basis.

iknowstuff 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Which companies?

dartharva 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Apple leaves gamers alone, it does not even attempt to be a nontrivial gaming platform and makes no promises. Why would gamers and gamedevs hate it? It just doesn't exist in their market.

xyzsparetimexyz 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Its a computer. People are gonna try and play computer games on it.

fidotron 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

From the noises that occur whenever you force a Windows loving gamedev to use a Mac the first major "problem" is mouse acceleration.

carlosjobim 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Don't have to remove anything. This used to be possible on Macs with bootcamp as they called it.

alwillis 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Bootcamp was a hedge when Apple was a lot less dominant than it is now.

When Apple transitioned from PowerPC to Intel, it wasn’t clear that was going to work. Being able to boot into Windows was sort of an insurance policy that’s no longer necessary.

wao0uuno 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Oh man I'd pay premium for a sleek device like this that CAN'T run Windows or Mac OS. Just a mere thought of being able to run pure Linux on that sweet sweet apple silicon with full driver support makes my juices flowing.

alwillis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

FYI: Apple added support for Linux containers to macOS Tahoe [1].

[1]: https://github.com/apple/container

NetMageSCW 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There will never be an Apple Silicon device without the ability to run an Apple OS.

Just run MacOS.

akdev1l 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

wine already runs on Mac so really they would just need something like dxvk to have a package similar to proton

To be honest if Apple wanted to they could work with valve to make gaming on Mac a reality

To some degree it should already be possible with wine + dxvk + moltenvk

alwillis 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I believe you’re being downvoted because your logic is from 20+ years ago when Windows compatibility was important.

Also the era when companies were trying to “kill” each other’s devices is no longer a thing.

They all get the reality it’s a multi device world and they need to work within it.

TingPing 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I assume you’re downvoted because Microsoft has to want that.

raverbashing 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Who cares about Windows anymore?

Kids are happy with iOS/Android devices

Google docs solves 90% of Office use cases

NetMageSCW 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Google Docs might handle 50% of people who use Office, but I doubt if it handles 25% of Office use cases. Few use every feature of Office but someone uses every feature of Office and all those power user cases that are different can’t be handled by Google Docs. Or even Web Office.

rk06 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

many people do. i work for Microsoft and don't have option to use mac os

raverbashing 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Well, last I checked most people don't work for MS so I reckon their experience might be a bit different