| |
| ▲ | herf 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | "Noftsker also shared the hacker aversion to cigarette smoke, and would sometimes express his displeasure by shooting a jet of pure oxygen from a canister he kept for that purpose; the astonished smoker would find his or her cigarette bursting into a fierce orange blur." - Hackers, Steven Levy, 1984 | |
| ▲ | WA 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | No smokers in my neighborhood, but people use their goddamn fireplaces too much and it’s kinda impossible to get fresh air in winter evenings and often during the day. Not sure how to train them. And unfortunately, there are too many. Burning wood should be forbidden in residential areas. It’s similar to smoking in restaurants, except you can’t escape them. | | |
| ▲ | adsteel_ 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My romantic views of wood smoke hit reality when I first camped in Canada's Banff-Jasper national parks, where you could buy unlimited firewood for the night for $5. Everyone bought it, it seemed. Trying to breathe downwind of a campground was a rude wakeup call. It should definitely be restricted in denser residential areas. I can't imagine some of the towns in Germany or Poland where residents depend on wood fires for heat. | | |
| ▲ | schrectacular 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Where they depend on wood for heat they are more likely to have efficient stoves that completely burn the wood. Smoke coming out of the chimney is "firing for the crows" and wasting fuel. | |
| ▲ | sejje 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | People should just make better fires. A good fire doesn't release much, if any smoke. It burns it up instead. A good woodstove is worth the money. | | |
| ▲ | robocat 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The stink remains even for efficient fires. Smoke is often correlated of course. I'm in Christchurch, New Zealand which gets winter smog,. The city council enforces rules and woodburners need to meet strict emission standards. They regularly tighten the rules so that if you want a woodburner you need to replace it every 15 years or so. But they do still smell. The rules have radically improved the air quality here and we now get much less smog than when I was a kid. Outright banning open fires and coal years ago made a big difference too. I'm not sure what happens if you don't follow the rules. A neighbour can make a complaint and there will get taken seriously and I believe they have a van sometimes checking too. Although I've personally never heard of anyone actually getting caught. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu an hour ago | parent [-] | | Sounds like a hellish existence, friend. No wonder all the elites like that place so much. | | |
| |
| ▲ | sevensor 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | People have romantic ideas about heating with fire and burn the most awful green wood in their fireplaces, stinking up the whole neighborhood. I understand burning bad wood because you have no options -- I witnessed a chimney fire or two as a kid that resulted from burning too much wet pine -- but I cannot fathom the mindset of someone who does it recreationally. |
|
| |
| ▲ | j-conn 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | 100% agree, many people don’t realize just how harmful wood smoke is. It’s also the main source of pollution in the Bay Area during the winter. Unfortunately energy costs are high enough here that people resort to burning wood to save money, so collectively beneficial policies are likely to face resistance (understandably). The purpleair map has been awesome to at least make the problem visible. I hope they are using it to aid enforcement on spare the air days. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu an hour ago | parent [-] | | Wood smoke is harmful? Hardly. Did you notice how they have banned and demonized tobacco, but the lung cancer rate keeps increasing? I just don't get it! Now they're coming for wood stoves next. I'm sure the cancer will go away after that. | | |
| ▲ | 47282847 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | “Burning wood at home produces more pollution than road traffic” https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjdne9ke0m1o “Residential wood-burning is the biggest source of particulate matter and soot/black carbon in Europe” https://www.fern.org/publications-insight/latest-evidence-on... “domestic wood-burning is the largest source of particulate pollution in the UK. Only 8% of the UK’s homes burn wood, but this accounts for around 21% of the total PM2.5 emissions, whereas all traffic on the UK roads produces 13%” https://medium.com/the-new-climate/why-the-environmental-mov... | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 17 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Ah yes, the proverbial Quick Google Search that proves me wrong. Sorry, can't be bothered to take any of that noise seriously. As I pointed out in my other now-censored post, I breathe in smoke every day through the copious amount of weed I smoke, and have done so for decades. I'm in perfect health. Odds are, much better than you in fact. When was the last time you were sick? For me it has been decades. Let's compare notes and decide which of us really knows the meaning of health. Everything is a lie. Believe none of it. |
| |
| ▲ | f33d5173 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Did you notice how they have banned and demonized tobacco, but the lung cancer rate keeps increasing? No, I noticed the opposite. They demonized tobacco, and lung cancer rates went dowm precipitously. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | carey an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The atmosphere above Christchurch, NZ tends to form layers in winter that trap the smoke and make this worse, and new fireplaces have been restricted to clean-burning log burners and dry wood by law. It seemed like the biggest change in air quality in recent years came from the tragic earthquakes in 2010 and 2011 knocking down all the unreinforced-masonry chimneys, though. | |
| ▲ | DiggyJohnson 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I cannot fathom making this comparison. | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you want "fresh air", why do you live near other people? Especially an entire neighborhood full of people who burn things, if you hate smoke. You can't have everything exactly how you please. Nothing worse than a busybody neighbor who thinks he owns the patent on how to live in a neighborhood. I live way out in the country exactly so I can live how I choose without some judgmental ass breathing down my neck. Maybe you should do the same to escape the terrible, obnoxious smell of burning wood. I'm sure there's weed smokers in the neighborhood causing you serious quality of life problems too. Escape while you still can! | | |
| ▲ | WA 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Good neighborhood = keep your emissions low. Be it sound, light, or smell. These rules apply to almost all public places. If you want to be loud, burn shit or have floodlights, move to a place outside of the city. | | |
| ▲ | blazers777 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | i see both sides, having lived with both super sensitive and petty neighbors, and also inconsiderate, loud neighbors. There are definitely sensitive people who have either misophonia rage, or PTSD from something, and they can't handle normal levels of city noise. on top of that, some apartments simply allow smoking inside. If they always use the balcony, they're really doing you a favor. if you are worried about emissions, you really have to think about cars and refineries and jets, and even restaurants. These are incredibly out of control when it comes to pollution and disease. in my experience, if you're buying machines and building devices, and your target refuses to play that game, then it's clear who the adult is, and who the child is. | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > move to a place outside of the city Now there's an idea I can get behind. Best move I ever made. City living and I just don't mix. | | |
| ▲ | sejje 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Five miles from pavement, and my air quality is perfect 365 days per year. I hear some gunshots during hunting season, echoing across the valley, but they'd be drowned out by the frogs singing--they're way louder. Wait until these guys start telling you you don't need a truck. | | |
| ▲ | technothrasher an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > I hear some gunshots during hunting season I don't mind the gunshots near my house during hunting season, because I have good neighbors. Those shots mean my freezer is getting stocked with venison. | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Right there with you man. Frogs and crickets and birds and all. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 1e1a 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What about a really loud fire alarm outside your house, that goes off whenever it detects even a slight amount of smoke? | |
| ▲ | nkrisc 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | People who smoke on the balconies of multi-unit buildings are awful people. It’d be a beautiful day but I can’t keep my windows open because there’s always somebody smoking to make my unit smell disgusting if I just want to enjoy a cool breeze going through. Thank goodness smoking is becoming rarer here and is no banned pretty much everywhere indoors and near entrances. I don’t mind if people have a vice (I’ve got mine) but keep me out of it. | | |
| ▲ | aidenn0 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Smoking tobacco got rarer here, but smoking marijuana has gotten much more common. I don't know if it's just that I grew up with tobacco, but the skunk-like smell of marijuana bothers me a lot more. | | |
| ▲ | nkrisc 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I didn’t even mention tobacco specifically because it’s the same either way. | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | aidenn0 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm agnostic as to the harms vs. benefits of smoking marijuana, it's the smell that bothers me. I personally love the smell of frankincense, but I would understand if my neighbors objected to me burning it regularly. | |
| ▲ | galangalalgol 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Inhaling any particulate seems like a pretty bad idea. I knew a Jamaican guy who thought people were silly for smoking it and said tea was the best. I have no opinion, not my vice of choice. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | fao_ 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > There is no such thing as "gluten intolerance", for example [citation needed]. I have celiac disease and a wheat allergy, which presented at the age of 3 comorbidly. If I ingest gliadin, my immune cells take the gliadin, run a nice little check on it, and then raise holy hell and destroy my gut villae. If I come into contact with wheat, I get a histamine response. Even a bag of (organic, locally produced) wheat flour opened in the same room as me used to be enough to make my airways close up. | | | |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | idiotsecant 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You sound just delightful. A wonderful blend of ignorant and weird-but-not-in-the-good-way. Smoking anything is bad for you, including the thing you like. PM 2.5 contamination is enormously harmful, and it doesn't magically go away if it's weed. | | | |
| ▲ | wasabi991011 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > There is no such thing as "gluten intolerance", for example--there is only glyphosate intolerance. This is absurd if you know anyone with a gluten intolerance. They have an immune reaction to organic wheat (so no glyphosate) but not to any other non-organic non-gluten produce (like oats, chickpea flour, etc. which have glyphosate). | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I've heard many anecdotes of Europeans who can't eat American wheat as it will make them sick. Even "organic." What is going on here? Something other than what we're told, is all. "Organic" is a word owned by the U.S. Government, and cannot be used without their permission. Now who owns the U.S. Government? Follow the money trail. Your anecdote is useful to further my understanding and I have no idea why it would be downvoted. | | |
| ▲ | nozzlegear 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | This is exactly the type of thing I'd expect to be posted by someone who smoked a corncob pipe full of weed all day, every day. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | zaphar 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't think I need to read your post history. This message already reads like some one in need of help. | | |
| ▲ | jemmyw 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I did read their post history. I guess it's nice to understand that people who rant like morons don't believe they rant like morons. I always wondered about the self awareness of it. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I note that neither you, nor the masses of people who presumably agree with your viewpoints and find mine contemptible, have been very argumentative with me about anything I've said. Curious, as I've also noticed this forum is full of people who will argue with a brick wall if they happen to disagree with its color. My comments have also been strangely devoid of downvotes and flags for being so wildly unpopular as you believe--this thread being the sole exception. If you think any of my viewpoints are wrong, please do me the courtesy of pointing out exactly where so that I can either correct myself, or correct your misperception, whatever the case may be. Passive aggressive put-downs aren't conducive to helping further anyone's understanding of anything. Nor is engaging in censorship. (I do realize such behavior is more of a 'modern society' trait than a personal one. This is why I make it a point to keep far away from what you call 'polite society.' Most of you aren't really what I'd call polite.) By the way, I identify as a "HE", not a "THEY." It's only one person here. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | throw20251220 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | nkrisc 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | No, because the noise of people just living life is not comparable to cigarette smoke. You can also use earplugs if you’re that sensitive to regular noises of people living around you. That kind of sensitivity is not normal though. I can’t stop cigarette smoke from seeping in to everything in my home if I leave the windows open. Also, smoking is not a necessary part of life. You can’t live silently. It’s not the same. | | |
| ▲ | throw20251220 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | dhosek 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Maybe if they spent less money on cigarettes they could afford other things. | | |
| ▲ | throw20251220 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Maybe. Go and ask them. Maybe they are truly awful people, maybe they are old or ill, or disabled. Go and talk to them, then start labelling them x and y. See? No one got the idea. All “you” want is that nobody bothers “you”. But thinking from the perspective of others? No, that’s too difficult. The best realisation I had in life was that I am pissing others off for some reasons, as they piss me off for some other reasons. Unfortunately the majority of the lovely “society” doesn’t have that realisation. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu an hour ago | parent [-] | | I'm sure you made some interesting arguments, but unfortunately I didn't get the opportunity as your posts have been flagged by the Reddit Nanny State. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | stevage 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | nkrisc 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > You can shut windows. They could just not smoke, or smoke far away from the building where it won’t bother anyone. > Where else do you think they are going to do it? I don’t know, I’m not the one smoking. That’s their problem to solve. I don’t think they’d like it if I left a bucket of rotting fish on my balcony. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > I don’t know, I’m not the one smoking. That’s their problem to solve. And this is exactly the problem. YOU are the problem. Your attitude is completely selfish and obnoxious, like your own concerns and value judgments should be the center of the universe. You are completely incapable of compromise, which is a necessary part of getting along with others. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | appreciatorBus 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | No, it doesn’t work that way. The sound of children playing is a normal part of human life, inseparable in fact from life. The smell of cigarette smoke is neither. | | |
| ▲ | stevage 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Only because you're defining one as normal and the other as abnormal. | | |
| ▲ | appreciatorBus 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It is possible for the human species to exist without cigarette smoke, and doubtless for at least part of our history it did not exist. It is not possible for the human species (or any form of mortal biological life) to exist without children. If you want to try to define the latter observation of reality as “abnormal”, fill your boots. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 44 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > It is possible for the human species to exist without cigarette smoke Yeah, and it's possible for it to exist without whatever pleasures you enjoy too that I don't approve of. I'm sure I can invent some twisted, self serving reasoning to justify why your activity should be banned, as I don't like it, and my judgment is better than yours. > It is not possible for the human species (or any form of mortal biological life) to exist without children. No, but some people's kids we could do without. Especially the ones who want to ban everything. |
| |
| ▲ | seattle_spring 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I remember when I was young and edgy, and thought dunking on parents was simply sharing hard truths. Boy am I glad I grew out of that mindset. |
|
| |
| ▲ | IanCal 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you smoke you might not realise just how absolutely awful it smells and how it sticks to material. Sounds of children don’t. | | |
| ▲ | paradox460 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't know man. I once heard the sound of children laughing and having fun, and now I've got kids of my own. |
| |
| ▲ | tqi 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes, that is the same because second degree kid noises also cause cancer. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 38 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Spoiler alert: the "second degree smoke" thing is bullshit, just like everything else you believe. |
| |
| ▲ | jmward01 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Society needs kids and has a collective responsibility to raise them. It has no such obligation to cigarette smoke. | | |
| ▲ | throw20251220 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | You want to have children? Cool. Made a mistake? Deal with it. Don’t make it sound like you are doing others a favour by having children though. “The society” will be fine without them. There are plenty out there nobody cares about. |
| |
| ▲ | RobotCaleb 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Did we find the smoker? | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | "The" smoker? There are millions of smokers, including on Hacker News, despite the Religious Police trying to run them off. | |
| ▲ | throw20251220 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The correct question is “have you found a smoker who smokes on a balcony”. |
| |
| ▲ | unsupp0rted 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You’re both correct, 100%. Seriously. | | |
| ▲ | throw20251220 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, it’s simply pissing me off that no person noticed the only abnormal behaviour here is the dude labelling the whole category of human beings as “awful” without trying to understand their motives. Selfish and entitled on a boss level. Are those who smoke on a top floor balcony also awful? Are those who smoke on a balcony of a multi-storey building they live alone in also awful people? | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 38 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I smoked a cigarette in the middle of the Amazon once. A game trail camera saw me and reported me to Do-Gooder Headquarters in California. I had a strongly worded email waiting for me in my inbox when I returned, explaining in detail what a terrible person I am for exposing those poor, innocent jungle creatures to my toxic smoke. |
|
| |
| ▲ | wookmaster 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | No, doesn’t work. Nice try though. | |
| ▲ | 725686 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You must be a very congenial neighbor. |
| |
| ▲ | sysworld 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It makes me a little sad to see a lot of peoples comments here about how they're annoyed by xyz thing someone does that doesn't stop at there fence line or unit. So many are being downvoted. | |
| ▲ | gljiva 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | They are not "awful people". You chose to live in a multi-unit apartment building with balconies close to windows, where so many neighbours smoke on the balconies that there is _always_ someone smoking close enough to make your apartment smell disgusting, then you judge them all as if they knew how much gets into your home and how sensitive you are to it. Instead of proposing an hourly half hour no smoke compromise on the next meeting of the building's co-owners, you just declare them awful people just because smoking is part of their lives. They live in a city and can't "just quit". That doesn't make them awful people. Tbh, I'd rather live with most of them than with you. Since they smoke on the balcony, rather than near roommates/family, many are likely more mindful and pleasant to coexist with than what you displayed. | | |
| ▲ | nkrisc 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Since they smoke on the balcony, rather than near roommates/family, many are likely more mindful and pleasant to coexist with than what you displayed. They’re more pleasant to coexist with because they let their smoke drift into my home instead of their own? What? They’re just externalizing the negatives of their own vice. | | |
| ▲ | gljiva 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You haven't mentioned that they: a) are aware that their smoke isn't dispersed enough by the breeze / open space to be unnoticeable. b) know there is someone close enough who isn't like them and other smokers, and is really bothered by the smoke. They do, however, go smoke on their balconies since they were made aware smoking inside is bad for their roommates/family. So, many of them are more likely than not reasonable people. They _could be_. While you _proved_ that you aren't, by not communicating it (or at least not mentioning it as if it isn't the most important reason why they are "awful people"), just judging them and holding a grudge. In this very comment you again showed that you don't care enough to understand others who you might disagree with, because I am just rephrasing what I already wrote, since you replied like I didn't. | | |
| ▲ | lazyasciiart 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | No, in my experience they smoke on the balcony because it is banned inside and will get them evicted. |
| |
| ▲ | wingworks 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, it's a bit worrying that some people don't seem to understand that just because you enjoy smoking, doesn't mean the rest of the units downstream of you want to breath it in too. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu an hour ago | parent [-] | | What's truly worrying is that you don't seem to understand that just because you don't enjoy smoking, doesn't mean it confers any kind of obligation on anyone else's part. |
|
| |
| ▲ | matheusmoreira 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > you just declare them awful people just because smoking is part of their lives They're awful people because they are drug addicts who insist on making their unbearable smoke part of our lives too. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu an hour ago | parent [-] | | I'll remember your hypocrisy next time I see you with the caffeine jitters. Addict. Seek help, please. | | |
| ▲ | matheusmoreira 34 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I don't drink coffee. And even if I did, caffeine is not a drug that spreads to others in the air they breathe. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > I don't drink coffee. And even if I did, caffeine is not a drug that spreads to others in the air they breathe. No, it's much more insidious. It amps people up like crack cocaine or methamphetamine. It's a real killer--people have died from it. That's why the U.S. military absolutely bans caffeine use during basic training, for example. It's a really dangerous drug that should be controlled. The people pushing this poison should be behind bars. Think of the children. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | lvturner 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I didn't "choose" to live in a multi-unit apartment, I live in Hong Kong - there is no other option. "Just leave them!" Yeah. Ok. Try empathy, it's free. | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu an hour ago | parent [-] | | Your ancestors have had many opportunities to leave Hong Kong over the years. They did not, nor have you. If close interaction with people who have different values than you bothers you, then move. There are other places to live in the world besides Hong Kong. You don't have to wage war against your neighbors who are simply trying to enjoy a smoke. |
| |
| ▲ | barbera7 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
| |
| ▲ | LightBug1 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I had this problem ... a smoker who would religiously sit on their patio and smoke so much that it would smoke us out of our house. After speaking with them didn't help ... my next response was to religiously water the garden at the same time with my jet spray ... I have amusing videos (from our CCTV) of our neighbour regularly diving for cover from an "accidental" spray of water. "Sorry. I'm just watering our plants, sorry about that". I wish I could say this solved it ... but the subtlety of the point that their smoking was impacting the enjoyment of our home, in the same way as my water spray was impacting his enjoyment of his garden was lost on them ... We eventually settled it the old fashioned way. Not with pistols or swords ... but an old-fashioned chat after reporting them to the local council. Luckily the problem is resolved ... but largely due to the threat of the Council taking action against their landlord. The only solution is leverage ... | | |
| ▲ | its_ubuntu an hour ago | parent [-] | | Attaboy! You punish that poor smoker for his unacceptable behavior. Now you can finally enjoy Your air the way that You like it. I'm guessing the rotten dog now has to go down the street to an abandoned lot 200 feet away from anything to enjoy a smoke? Good. He's learned his place--away from his betters. | | |
|
|