| ▲ | sejje 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
People should just make better fires. A good fire doesn't release much, if any smoke. It burns it up instead. A good woodstove is worth the money. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | robocat 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The stink remains even for efficient fires. Smoke is often correlated of course. I'm in Christchurch, New Zealand which gets winter smog,. The city council enforces rules and woodburners need to meet strict emission standards. They regularly tighten the rules so that if you want a woodburner you need to replace it every 15 years or so. But they do still smell. The rules have radically improved the air quality here and we now get much less smog than when I was a kid. Outright banning open fires and coal years ago made a big difference too. I'm not sure what happens if you don't follow the rules. A neighbour can make a complaint and there will get taken seriously and I believe they have a van sometimes checking too. Although I've personally never heard of anyone actually getting caught. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sevensor 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
People have romantic ideas about heating with fire and burn the most awful green wood in their fireplaces, stinking up the whole neighborhood. I understand burning bad wood because you have no options -- I witnessed a chimney fire or two as a kid that resulted from burning too much wet pine -- but I cannot fathom the mindset of someone who does it recreationally. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||