| ▲ | mg 5 days ago |
| The people at Google seem to think much more like me than the people at Apple. There are 3 primary decisions Google made that click with me, while Apple's choices are a mystery to me: 1: When I put a Pixel on a table, it sits there stable. Because the backside is symmetrical. When I put an iPhone on a table, it wobbles. 2: When I sort my photos on a Pixel, I sort them in folders. The "camera" folder is where the unsorted photos are. When I sit in a bus or in a cafe, I go through it and sort the new photos into folders. This seems impossible on iPhones. Everything stays in the main folder forever. You can add photos to albums, but that does not remove them from the main folder. So there is no way to know which photos I have already sorted. 3: On Android I can use Chrome. Which means web apps can use the File System Access API. This makes web apps first class productivity applications I can use to work on my local files. Impossible on iPhones. I'm sure people who prefer iPhones have their own set of "this clicks with me on iPhones and puzzles me on Pixels" aspects? Is this a "left brain vs right brain" type of thing? Do most HNers prefer Androids? |
|
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Same for me, although I currently use an iPhone (and the rest of the Apple ecosystem). I actually don't like iOS, and barely tolerate macOS but I love the hardware on mac right now. For me, it's Apple's privacy stance (which I know could change at anytime, but that's where we are at right now). Give me a Pixel & all the Google stuff but without Google, and with advanced data protection and Apple's tracking protection and transparency and I'm in. As long as apps on Android can do crap like the web-to-app tracking via localhost and other shady data harvesting that Google continues to allow, I don't touch it no matter how much better it is and how much I prefer the workflows. Also, on either platform, why is it still not possible to toggle off network access in app permissions. Its a glaring and deliberate omission. |
| |
| ▲ | highwaylights 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > barely tolerate macOS I guess it depends what you’re comparing it to but macOS is (for me) the best of a bad bunch of compromises. POSIX with app boundaries that are (mostly) respected, if not particularly granular. There’s nothing I really hate about the platform save for homebrew and being walled in to the ecosystem. I actually love modern Linux with Gnome, and it has all the parts these days to be a great desktop operating system, but I find the freedom there undercuts a lot of the promises (Flatpaks are a good idea in theory that doesn’t work in practice as the sandboxes are overly liberal and overreach on most apps because no-one’s forced to justify why they need the permissions they do etc). I spent so long on Windows that I really don’t miss it. The Window management was way better for so long, but the idioms drive me crazy (registry issues and programs still freely writing anywhere they like), and supporting everything forever has massive drawbacks to usability (although Winget sort of slightly helps with this but it’s not much better than homebrew). | | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > best of a bad bunch of compromises That's exactly why I don't particularly care for it, but still use it. My first choice would be Linux + a tiling WM. I used DWM for years before Apple Silicon, and have been on mac ever since the M1. These new machines are so nice that I can't go back to anything else now, whether I hate the software or not. But macOS is just baffling. There's POSIX underneath, and it's mostly reliable, and it has a lot of little nice touches - being able to search the menu with Cmd+Shift+/, emacs keybindings in nearly every text field, etc. But then there's stuff that makes no sense. Why do I need a third party app for any sort of sane window management? (and even then, I haven't fully replicated my preferred way of working, only gotten close enough with Aerospace, and more recently Raycast). A third party app to set a keyboard shortcut to launch an application. I can't disable the animations for switching virtual desktops, and when you switch there's a lag before it's responsive again for keyboard input (I just want this to be instant). So much of how macOS expects you to interact with it seems to be mouse/touchpad driven, and that's just not how I prefer to use my computer. At least with Raycast I now have shortcuts to launch and switch to apps (but not specific app windows because of the app/window separation in macOS). Yet even still, I can't set a keyboard shortcut to move a window to a different space. I have to click and hold the title bar and then press my shortcut for moving to that space to move the window - Apple decided that action MUST involve the mouse. I also can't set window rules. I can't tell my terminal to always open on workspace 2, or mail.app to always open on workspace 4 at a specific size, etc. Making an app full screen also creates a new ephemeral space that can't be switched to with the usual Ctrl+NUM keyboard shortcut. I can't set a window to be always on top. I'm more or less waiting for Asahi Linux to get support for DisplayPort ALT mode & M4 support, although I'm not holding my breath. I do appreciate having access to the big commercial apps though on macOS, but ultimately I want my M4 macbook pro w/ Linux & hyprland. | | |
| ▲ | 4diii 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Definitely agree about those nice touches. Just a few thoughts from my experience as of late. - Window management wise the new tiling controls/keyboard shortcuts added last year have replaced third party tools for me. It's not as customisable as rectangle or moom but it covers halves and quarters which is mostly all I need. Additionally the "arrange" feature is nice letting you automatically tile N most recently used windows in a given layout. - For window rules you can right click on an app in the dock and under options assign it to the current workspace and it should reopen there. - 3rd party software like BetterTouchTool can "throw" windows to other spaces. But it did feel a bit hacky from memory (small but perceptible lag) - The new spotlight features coming this year look quite promising for keyboard driven workflows. | |
| ▲ | lostlogin 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | So much this. I’ve migrated a home server to a Mac mini. It was awful to achieve. Trying to get a machine to boot, connect network shares and start containers was a week long effort. I can do it in Ubuntu in about 10 minutes from a clean install. So much is disgusting UI options hidden deep some in the (awful) settings app. But the result is a server that is fast, powerful and using 6-7W per hour, compared to the old Nuc 9 it replaced that used 70W. It’s just so good. The OS lets it down. | | |
| ▲ | simfree 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The new Intel NUCs are only like a hundred something dollars for an N150 CPU and come with 16 gigs of RAM and a SSD. Why pay so much more to fight an uphill battle? Unless you desperately need the hot garbage that is Xcode there isn't much reason to deal with Mac Minis running MacOS as a server. One update and it will suspend and be unwakeable without physical interaction. | | |
| ▲ | lostlogin 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I had a list of things I wanted: I have limited space so needed a small form factor. I am on solar and wanted power usage to be low. I wanted 10Gb Ethernet. It’s on a smart plug, so I can power cycle it remotely. The hardware is far superior to any Nuc, I have at 4 or 5 of those already, I really like them. MacOS is a struggle, but I think I’ve tamed it. I wasn’t the one paying. | | |
| ▲ | simfree 4 days ago | parent [-] | | If your not paying, then it really does not matter. 10Gbps equipment is pretty spendy |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | moelf 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >Give me a Pixel & all the Google stuff but without Google https://grapheneos.org/ | | |
| ▲ | no_wizard 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | As a consumer, I lament most of all about Pixel devices (or any other Android device really) that I have to wipe the OS and install a different one to get features that matter to me, particularly around privacy. Thats why I don't use Pixel devices, or any Android devices really. I know its a precarious situation with Apple since they could reverse their stance at any point and sometimes they get it wrong, but they have yet to completely fail me when it comes to privacy. In any event, it'd be nice if there was a 3rd mainstream vendor in the mobile race[0][1] [0]: Both design wise and conceptually, I miss WebOS when it was strictly under Palm. It could have really been something. Why they didn't embrace multitouch screens I haven't a clue, it was the one thing that baffled me. [1]: The one project I really wanted Mozilla to take a long term view on - Firefox OS - was another great innovation of our time that didn't get the love or support it deserved. It was a blast using web technology to build apps that ran fluidly on modern hardware. Unfortunately, it was all too often relegated to cheap manufacturer hardware that couldn't support it ideally, but even with this being true, they pulled off alot of technical excellence with that project. | | |
| ▲ | zem 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I miss Nokia's maemo/meego based phones :( the n900 was really nice to use and even write my own little personal apps for (something I haven't done in over a decade of owning android phones) | | | |
| ▲ | jraph 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | /e/ Foundation sells phones with /e/OS preinstalled if you'd like an ungoogled Android phone without having to wipe the OS and install an ungoogled Android yourself. I haven't tried /e/, I prefer installing a raw lineage with microG myself (although I don't currently use the microG part), but it seems like you and your parent commenter would be in the intended target. I do agree that an alternative would be great. I'd gladly use Linux mobile with good, realiable hardware. | | |
| ▲ | chasil 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The Bliss launcher in /e/OS does not support widgets conventionally, and the best thing to do is immediately replace it. I used Lawnchair, and it did improve things. It did encourage me to provide my Google account credentials, which I refrained to do, which made the appstore essentially equivalent to F-droid. I can't really get excited about it. |
| |
| ▲ | maples37 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Apparently the GrapheneOS folks are talking with an OEM[0], which would allow you to buy a phone with a secure, private, non-spyware operating system straight from the factory. I already own a Pixel running GrapheneOS, but if this happens I'll probably order one as soon as they come out to cast a vote with my wallet. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44678411 | | |
| ▲ | chiefalchemist 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I hope this happens in 2026, not later. If they have a model with a removable / replaceable battery that would be heaven. |
| |
| ▲ | colordrops 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Apple isn't privacy oriented, please quit spreading this misnformation. The only thing you can say about them is that they are marginally better than google but that isn't saying much. Their supposed respect of privacy is just marketing. | | |
| ▲ | bestnameever a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Apple doesn't track anywhere close to the amount of data that Google collects. Equating them is very disingenuous, IMO. | |
| ▲ | tonyhart7 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | lol there is only 2 vendor in market right now google and apple, apple is the best in this privacy field | | |
| ▲ | colordrops 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Did you read the thread? Google devices are orders of magnitude more private if you install a custom rom like graphene OS or lineage + microg. Apple is pretty much the same as a vanilla google phone in comparison. | | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > Google devices are orders of magnitude more private if you install a custom rom like graphene OS or lineage + microg. Sure, but then it ceases being a Google device. The discussion is focused around Pixel, as is, vs. Apple/iOS, in which case Apple wins by far in that aspect. | | |
| ▲ | colordrops 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Semantics. It's still a Pixel device regardless of the software. The OS is still Android. Android is open source. |
| |
| ▲ | tonyhart7 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | why you acting like android apps is free from tracking ???? "Apple is pretty much the same as a vanilla google phone in comparison" Google literally Ads company, do you know how ads company works???? | | |
| ▲ | colordrops 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Look into it rather than speaking out of ignorance. There are several ways to block ads on Android. First and most-important, with a de-googled OS like Lineage or /e, the built-in tracking functionality just isn't there. To blame the OS for an app spying on you is like saying Firefox is spying on you for Google because a webpage has a google tracker in it. Nonsense. An app is not the same as the OS. You can just not install the app like you would not visit the page. But even then, open source android has many ways to block ads if you do want to install shitty apps that track you. - The AdAway app that uses host file updates - App Warden, which actually disables tracking libraries in apps - LineageOS has the ability to turn off network access for apps that don't need them - AFWall+ for app-level firewall rules. The OS is absolutely not spying on you and actually gives you tools to stop spying. You can't say this AT ALL about Apple or vanilla Google Android. | |
| ▲ | akimbostrawman 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | And so is apple https://www.wired.com/story/apple-is-an-ad-company-now/ | | |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | seviu 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Did you try a Jolla phone? Not expensive and work great. Was playing with one today. I am impressed. | | |
| ▲ | nextos 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I love Jolla and I wish more people used it so that there was a really good native browser and different chat + VoIP options. The rest is great, and you can always use Android applications via the emulation layer. |
| |
| ▲ | eredengrin 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | fwiw, installing GrapheneOS is by far the easiest phone OS install I've ever done. It's been a while but if there were any hiccups, they were too small to remember. My memory is just plug it into desktop with usb-c cable, go to grapheneos website in chromium (it uses web usb so no firefox), hit the install button, and wait a couple minutes. And yes, it allows you to disable network permissions for apps, among many other nice things. | |
| ▲ | rossjudson 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What privacy feature are you looking for that Pixels don't supply? | | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > What privacy feature are you looking for that Pixels don't supply? Opt-in cross app tracking instead of opt-out, but if Google can get all apps on board with their new privacy sandbox thing that'll be less relevant. More importantly, an equivalent to Apple's advanced data protection for all Google services & backups. I want full E2EE for photos, notes, backups, passwords, bookmarks, etc. I want built-in hide my email to gmail, I want to be able to turn off network access for any app I want in the permission settings. I want Google to treat Android as something completely separate from their advertising business instead of an extension of it as a source of data collection. |
| |
| ▲ | hollandheese 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | >I miss WebOS when it was strictly under Palm. It could have really been something. Why they didn't embrace multitouch screens I haven't a clue, it was the one thing that baffled me. Huh? WebOS was Palm embracing multitouch screens. | | |
| |
| ▲ | daniel_reetz 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I've been running GrapheneOS for a few months now, keeping my old Samsung on WiFi as a backup. It is such a breath of fresh air. It is so quiet and functional. It feels like it prioritizes me, the user. I am so grateful to have this OS. Of course it has flaws, but they're lesser flaws. Like the crop tool is sometimes unusable in the gallery app. I can live with that. I couldn't live with the AI onslaught and spyware infiltration. | |
| ▲ | chasil 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | After looking at it, there are many things that I do not like about Graphene, and many ways that it tries hard not to be likable. Beyond the monochrome icon pack that cannot be changed in the included launcher (which is so aesthetically challenged with an appearance that only a mother could love), the browser that cannot grasp dark mode, and the lack of the accustomed pattern unlock, I find the lack of one singular thing intolerable: I want root. At a minimum, adb rooted debugging. I realize that I could unlock the bootloader and Magisk this thing, but with the number of correct decisions that have been made by the authors of this operating system (and they are legion), they do not recognize one fundamental need of administrators: I want control of my systems. That is really a shame. | | | |
| ▲ | k4rnaj1k 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Isn't battery life worse on it? I did consider it at some point but not having google wallet(apparently nfc payments are only available via banks' apps there) was too big of a downside for me. | | |
| ▲ | j1elo 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It is Google themselves choosing to prevent GrapheneOS from passing the validation checks required to make GPay work (which is the app that makes the actual payment). Wallet is there, you can hold digital cards, and transit cards, and your Ikea member card, etc. It's GPay that won't work to do the payment. And it's Google the one being a bully and deliberately making you think like that towards any alternative that's not in their list of approved systems that can be used in your own phone. | |
| ▲ | Itoldmyselfso 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
| |
| ▲ | StopDisinfo910 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Could anyone here waxing lyrically about Apple so called privacy stand explain to me what that actually is apart from a marketing point Apple keeps repeating? Because from where I stand they do load everything into their cloud. They insist on having you pay for iCloud through obnoxious means. They have you go through their store for everything. They even have an ad platform. What supposedly so good about it? Their track record seems awful to me. | | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | E2EE (advanced data protection) without having to use something like Proton, so can stay in the very convenient "ecosystem." With it turned on, keys are on your device, Apple doesn't have them and can't use them and it covers all the main stuff - photos, messages, notes, etc. It's still a compromise, sure, but it's a better compromise than what Google offers. Plus small things. Apple's tracking protection for example is opt in instead of opt out on Android. Google's core business is ads, they won't push features that can negatively impact that. Apple also has an ad division but it's not their main focus, hardware is. They can implement better privacy without impacting their bottom line. Apple's refusal to unlock phones at the request of the FBI, etc. It's not that Apple is the be all end all for privacy, but they are far ahead of Google and are by far the most convenient option if you are within the walled garden. | | |
| ▲ | bmicraft 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > With it turned on, keys are on your device, Apple doesn't have them and can't use them and it covers all the main stuff - photos, messages, notes, etc. Or so they say. Has that actually been proven? | | |
| ▲ | NobodyNada 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It's impossible to prove a negative, like "Apple doesn't have a backdoor". One can prove the existence of a backdoor by reverse-engineering suspicious code or network traffic, but not the nonexistence without poring over every byte of machine code, and quite a lot of the hardware too. This is not unique to Apple, it's impossible to prove any system is free of a backdoor, including Linux distributions (see: the xz backdoor, or "Reflections on trusting trust"), unless you hand-crafted your whole smartphone from raw silicon. | |
| ▲ | gruez 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You can raise that gripe with even something like signal. Sure, it's open source, but when was the last time someone reproducibility built it? | | |
| ▲ | tga_d 5 days ago | parent [-] | | People reproducibly build Signal all the time. There's a bug right now that makes the play store version differ from the one you get by downloading off their website/build from source, but you can examine the differences to see they're minor. | | |
| ▲ | gruez 5 days ago | parent [-] | | >People reproducibly build Signal all the time source? Is there a site that tracks this, or only shows up when someone raises an issue on github? | | |
| ▲ | tga_d 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Pick a decently up-to-date fork of Signal on GitHub and look at its Actions. You can also just do it yourself if you'd like, the process is effectively just doing a build in a docker container and comparing the result. https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/blob/main/reprod... | | |
| ▲ | gruez 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The github action finishing is not the same as "reproducibility built it", which implies verification against the official build. | | |
| ▲ | tga_d 5 days ago | parent [-] | | There is a dedicated reproducible builds action that verifies that it does match (currently failing because of the aforementioned bug). I'm not sure why you're still litigating this when, again, you can not only just go look at it, you can very much do it yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | iamdamian 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Could anyone here waxing lyrically about Apple so called privacy stand explain to me what that actually is apart from a marketing point Apple keeps repeating? The end-to-end encryption guarantees on this page seem pretty real to me and have little to do with marketing: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102651 | | |
| ▲ | lern_too_spel 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Google backup on Android is also end-to-end encryption. The difference is that on Android, I can self-host anything that Apple won't end-to-end encrypt, like maps or application installs. | |
| ▲ | snypher 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Can any of this be verified or confirmed independently? | | |
| ▲ | atomicthumbs 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | how do you propose they prove that they don't have your encryption keys | |
| ▲ | ritcgab 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You just cannot prove a party doesn't own something. |
|
| |
| ▲ | nicoburns 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Because from where I stand they do load everything into their cloud. They insist on having you pay for iCloud through obnoxious means. They have you go through their store for everything. They even have an ad platform. It's very easy to completely disable iCloud. I've never used it and don't intend to, despite running a mac as my primary computer for ~12 years now. | | |
| ▲ | StopDisinfo910 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > It's very easy to completely disable iCloud. My experience widely differs. Apple will nag you all the time if you don’t have iCloud or just use the free tier and the free tier is very limited. You lose the only way to actually easily sync the phone when you disable it. Most of the iPhone owners I know including me have caved and pay the additional tax every month. | |
| ▲ | throwaway290 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | This is correct. Maybe settings will show you a login button but except for that you're fine. |
| |
| ▲ | paulddraper 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Apple is much more strict on app tracking (and apps in general). | | |
| ▲ | v5v3 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Yes. As an example I think Androids have a single device ID which is given to all apps. But iOS has a per app device ID. | | |
| ▲ | theshrike79 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | And the ID resets pretty often. The marketing department exploded when Apple announced that change, it made user conversion tracking completely useless. | |
| ▲ | ajross 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There is no device ID, only ones tied to a user login on a phone, and the app must request a permission to get it. You can, for example, know that the user ID (which you obviously also need to have a permission to retrieve), is being used on the same device as was used to access your service in the past. Or you can know that this particular otherwise-anonymous user/device combination is being used again. I'm pretty sure that's likewise possible on iOS, but folks can chime in. And of course there are guidelines that disallow most of the abuse scenarios I suspect people want to imagine: https://developer.android.com/identity/user-data-ids | | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Not familiar with how Android does it anymore, but sounds fairly similar to iOS. The main difference is it's opt in on iOS, but opt out on Android I believe. On iOS, when the app pops up and asks to track, if the user says no, the app can't access the system advertising ID at all, and also is not permitted to track activity via other means like email address, user ID, etc (but the only thing that's technologically enforced is the system advertising ID, it's only forbidden by policy to not use other tracking methods). Given the huge fit Meta threw after Apple implemented this, while they were silent about Android, I'm inclined to believe Apple's method has more of a privacy impact. Also worth noting Google is hoping to move away from device-level advertising IDs with their "privacy sandbox" thing. |
| |
| ▲ | gruez 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes, specifically both have some variant of "advertising ID", which is shared across all apps. The difference between iOS and Android is that iOS requires you to opt every app into receiving it, whereas Android is opt out. However on top of this Android has a "gsf" id, which is shared between apps, and can't be changed without a factory reset. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | NetOpWibby 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The privacy stuff and the hardware quality are my main reasons as well. Oh, and Chrome OS isn't a real OS to me so I couldn't imagine using that as my daily driver as I would macOS. Another reason I stick with Apple is style/design. Aside from the latest Alan Dye-led stuff, Apple's design has been top-notch, they make every other company look like they lack class and design-sense. With that said, I did like Nokia's Windows Phones and the the period of Microsoft's design revolution where Surface devices had suede or whatever. That massive Surface table thing was dope too but man, Windows just keeps getting worse...somehow! I'm looking forward to getting a Framework laptop at some point and installing Linux. | | |
| ▲ | RattlesnakeJake 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > Apple's design has been top-notch But only from the iPhone X to 14, after which the Dynamic Island took over. (I'll see myself out) | | |
| ▲ | highwaylights 5 days ago | parent [-] | | No judgement here. I liked my touchbar, and was pretty productive with it before it got axed. | | |
| ▲ | dwaite 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I maintain that if the Touch Bar had been made full height and had an affordance (like slightly more distance) to prevent accidental touches, it would have been way more practical. Apple tends to have products on a design refresh schedule, and for the Mac is it about five years. I think the combination of user dislike of the initial implementation and limited developer integration caused the physical Touch Bar to be eliminated in the M1 design. | | |
| ▲ | NoMoreNicksLeft 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | There are a few unicode characters I keep finding myself needing to type when I transcribe, and the Touchbar would be perfect for this. Except, there's no good way to just "add keys for that". You have add quick actions, which means writing Applescript that copies those into the clipboard and pastes... this is slow enough that it's noticeable (never mind having to first hit the quick actions button). On top of that, even though the label for the quick action is that single character, the buttons that it renders are like 2 inches wide. So instead of being able to fit 20 such buttons/keys on it, I can fit exactly 6. You have to swipe left and right to see the others. Is there a Minecraft extension so that the Touchbar becomes the game's hotbar with icons? I've never looked. | |
| ▲ | wtallis 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't think the touchbar was going to be worthwhile without haptic feedback. At the very least, it needed the force sensors used for the touchpad so that accidental touches could be properly rejected. | | |
| ▲ | highwaylights 5 days ago | parent [-] | | There’s a universe where the touchbar sits above the function row without trying to replace it and is a killer feature. |
| |
| ▲ | epolanski 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The amount of times I mute the audio with that stupid touch bar.. | |
| ▲ | GloriousKoji 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I've said this before but the trackpad is too big and they could have fit both function keys and touch bar and everyone would have been happy. | | |
| ▲ | shootingoyster 5 days ago | parent [-] | | This might be the first time I've heard somebody complain about a trackpad being too big, usually it's the other way around. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | ajross 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Chrome OS isn't a real OS to me so I couldn't imagine using that as my daily driver as I would macOS Not sure I understand this? One assumes that "daily driver" involves Linux VM use in this context[1], and ChromeOS's Linux VM integration is just wildly ahead of WSL (which really isn't bad) or the mess on OS X (awful). Installed Crostini apps appear as native apps in the UI. Transparent cross-filesystem access works flawlessly. Wayland and X11 apps appear with native decorations. Clipboard/WM/IPC integration does exactly what you expect. USB devices prompt you if you want to connect to the VM on insert (and remember the setting) etc... And yes, I'm biased because I work there. But really it's a great development environment. [1] I mean, if you're doing iOS development or need an M4 Max for performance reasons, or need some legacy Mac tooling like Adobe stuff, you're probably not looking at alternative platforms at all. Someone making the choice you posit is like 99% likely to be a web or embedded person working at a Linux shell as their native environment. | | |
| ▲ | lern_too_spel 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The Debian experience on my kid's Chromebook in Crostini is truly fantastic. The Android experience, on the other hand, leaves a lot to be desired. I had hoped a convertible Chromebook could give them access to all the learning apps across Linux, the web, and Android on a single device; but a lot of Android apps tell the Play Store they aren't compatible, and I have to jump through hoops to get them installed. | | |
| ▲ | ajross 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | To be fair (and, again, biased), Android apps run wildly better on a Chromebook than they do on a Mac or Windows box. :) School Chromebooks are very limited devices (often these were low-end units purchased at the beginning of the pandemic!), and you're likely comparing it to the flagship Samsung or whatever in your pocket, which is just objectively a much more powerful computer. | |
| ▲ | sturob 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | For a good experience running Android apps on ChromeOS you really need an ARM CPU and a decent amount of RAM (12 or 16). |
|
| |
| ▲ | jemmyw 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Apple's design has been top-notch The only designs I'm fond of are the macs. The iPhone looks pretty meh these days. The software side is slowly getting worse, it was great and they've lost the plot making changes for changes sake |
| |
| ▲ | ThePowerOfFuet 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >Give me a Pixel & all the Google stuff but without Google, and with advanced data protection and Apple's tracking protection and transparency and I'm in. GrapheneOS may interest you. >Also, on either platform, why is it still not possible to toggle off network access in app permissions. Its a glaring and deliberate omission. GrapheneOS specifically supports this for all installed apps. | | |
| ▲ | littlecranky67 5 days ago | parent [-] | | All of my banking apps that are required for 2FA would probably not work. | | |
| ▲ | pferde 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | You might want to take a gander at this list: https://privsec.dev/posts/android/banking-applications-compa... | | |
| ▲ | littlecranky67 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Looks like the list includes those apps that require access to Google Play services - which defeats the entire point of the OP wanting the privacy. | | |
| ▲ | maples37 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | GrapheneOS not only provides a sandbox for Google Play (meaning it's just another app with no special privileges, and you can grant/revoke permissions (including network!) as you desire), it also heavily promotes user profiles for further isolation. I have a "banking" profile set up with Google Play services installed. 98% of the time I'm using my phone, I'm using the primary Owner profile. All the other profiles are encrypted-at-rest, meaning that until I enter my Banking-profile-specific PIN, the apps and data (including the Google Play Services installed there) are just encrypted files, and unable to do anything at all. (There are provisions for allowing a secondary profile to run in the background, but in this case I have obviously left that disabled.) | | |
| ▲ | parlortricks 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | That sounds great, how much friction does this setup cause you daily? Could you hand your phone to a firend or family easily if they needed it? | | |
| ▲ | pferde 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Each profile in GrapheneOS is encrypted separately, and switching profiles require entering a PIN (plus additional biometric methods if you set them up for that profile) before the data is decrypted and accessible. So yes, you can hand the phone over to a friend or family, and they cannot get to any other user profile. Or you can set up a separate profile just for them, and they will have their own isolated set of apps - something like a separate user account on a desktop PC. And if only they know the PIN for their profile and you don't, they can keep secrets from you on that profile. |
| |
| ▲ | littlecranky67 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sounds like an awful lot of work vs. just having an iPhone and regularly install your banking app on it, and still not get spied on. | | |
| ▲ | dns_snek 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | This myth that you're not being tracked in very similar ways if you use an iPhone is nothing but genius marketing and PR. Do some research about the type and quantity of telemetry that's sent back to the mothership from your iOS device, it's not materially different from regular Android. > Both iOS and Google Android transmit telemetry, despite the user explicitly opting out of this. When a SIM is inserted both iOS and Google Android send details to Apple/Google. iOS sends the MAC addresses of nearby devices, e.g. other handsets and the home gateway, to Apple together with their GPS location. Currently there are few, if any, realistic options for preventing this data sharing https://www.scss.tcd.ie/doug.leith/apple_google.pdf | | |
| ▲ | littlecranky67 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Not saying there is no spying, but Google is definitely a worse offender, by orders of magnitude. This, plus the lots of nagging + nudging dialogues a stock Android phones tries to get you to allow data collection. Google Maps is a prominent one, that by default tracks your each and every move and sends it to google. Web+App cross ID fingerprinting is also something Google has no issue with. Safari on iOS defaults to delete cookies every 7 days based on some AI logic to measure interactions. AirDrop works offline only between devices etc. P.S: Citing a paper from 2021 is propably useless. Apple was the driving force in dropping trackable App ids, google had to follow suit. More stuff has happend in the space since then. | | |
| ▲ | dns_snek 4 days ago | parent [-] | | > Not saying there is no spying, but [...] But that is exactly what your previous comment said: >> Sounds like an awful lot of work vs. just having an iPhone and regularly install your banking app on it, and still not get spied on. Installing GrapheneOS admittedly requires a computer, a browser, and about 15 minutes of your time after you buy the device, assuming you've never done it before, but claiming that that's "an awful lot of work" compared to "just" having an iPhone is false. They don't provide even remotely the same level of control over your privacy or security. With technical hardening measures on one side, and on the other, a vague promise that Apple might crack down on third party tracking methods that happen to be misaligned with their own business goals. > AirDrop works offline only between devices etc. That's actually a great example because Apple obediently restricted AirDrop as soon as Chinese authorities discovered that it was being used for anti-government protests. Apple doesn't care about privacy ideologically, their actions in other countries and their commitment to growing their advertising business should serve as proof of that, but there's clearly some dissonance at play. |
|
| |
| ▲ | prmoustache 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | what makes you think you are not getting spied on? Most banking apps are just glorified websites anyway with all the usual analytics tool embedded that you cannot disable with a browser extension. |
|
| |
| ▲ | dns_snek 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | GrapheneOS sandboxes Google Play services, it's just a regular app without any special privileges. You can remove all of its permissions. | |
| ▲ | Itoldmyselfso 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
| |
| ▲ | prmoustache 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | My banking apps work fine on grapheneos. |
|
| |
| ▲ | aucisson_masque 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Same stance, iOS isn’t the best but the least bad. Google is an anchor to Android, supposedly Android is open source and everyone can contribute but at the end no device can be sold without Google play services and Google decides what is accepted in the aosp project. If aosp was actually open, like managed by all biggest phone seller in a consortium, i bet we would actually have feature that people want to get. Instead of a thousand « material you » redesign, that honestly looked ugly from the get go and isn’t much better years later. Many people want to be able to invert the recent and back button, most in fact, yet Google stubbornly refuse to add that setting. That’s just an example, but this repeat a thousand time over the whole Android project. | | | |
| ▲ | AstralSerenity 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I would love to have Android software on an Apple device. Their hardware is incredible! Ultimately, I tolerate Android from a privacy standpoint because we're still able to fully modify our devices and use open-source app sources. The minute that goes away (and it feels like Google isn't as tolerant of it anymore), I go. | |
| ▲ | andrepd 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Give me a Pixel & all the Google stuff but without Google, and with advanced data protection and Apple's tracking protection and transparency and I'm in. This is literally GrapheneOS or LineageOS+microg x) which ironically is fully available on Pixel phones and and a slowly vanishing number of others... | |
| ▲ | tyleo 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I actually don't like iOS, and barely tolerate macOS but I love the hardware on mac right now. I just got my first MacBook Pro this month and feel this exactly. I prefer Windows as an OS hands down. It works with all my peripherals and has better configuration options. But the hardware makes up for it. My MacBook Pro is about twice as fast as my new x86 desktop from work. Its battery is nearly 15x longer than my Razer laptop and four times as fast. I’ll take gaps in the software quality for all of the progress in hardware quality. | |
| ▲ | tgma 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Linux performs quite well on M1/M2 Macs (I'd even argue they are the best laptops to run Linux), almost counter-intuitively to some people's expectations. The worst Macs to run Linux on are actually the last Intel models with T1/T2 stuff. It takes some time for folks to port to new M chips as they come out but once they do, due to the popularity and similar peripherals they work well. | | |
| ▲ | prmoustache 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Hasn't porting of newer models completely stalled since the departure of the 2 motivated and skilled individuals that made it originally possible? | | |
| ▲ | tgma 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I'm not following the drama, but even an older M1 Pro Mac beats almost every other PC laptop for Linux unless you specifically need x86 (or in love with OLED panels). In fullness of time, Macs are popular enough that I am confident Linux will be ported. |
|
| |
| ▲ | epolanski 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I genuinely do not understand this claim and propaganda about Apple privacy. 1) it's known they scan all your content and pics on iCloud 2) the phone's always listening, always 3) once that I forgot my password to the MacBook, all one needed to do to access my data was to enter recovery mode and reset the password. Sure it logged me off from browser sessions, but all my files where there available to anybody To me apple is overly invasive with their icloud accounts and things, and password resets taking weeks, yet I see no evidence it is any harder to get my data than on other devices, if anything, it's easier. So what is the claim here? Some tracking less by advertisers? That's privacy? An ad less about computers and one slightly less correct about idk wine? The fact is that anybody with physical access to my devices has an easier time logging through the apple ones than the windows/androids i own and that I care more than advertising | | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Apple is the only one that offers actual E2EE with advanced data protection for all iCloud services. Without it, yes, Apple can see your data. With it on, they can't. The key is stored on device, encrypted with your device pin/passcode and covers iCloud backup, including messages, drive, photos, notes, reminders, bookmarks, shortcuts, voice memos, wallet, passwords, health data, journal, home, maps, etc. The only thing not covered under ADP is iCloud mail, contacts, and calendars because it uses CalDAV and CardDAV. > once that I forgot my password to the MacBook, all one needed to do to access my data was to enter recovery mode and reset the password. Sure it logged me off from browser sessions, but all my files where there available to anybody Sounds like you didn't have FileVault (FDE) turned on. If you did, that wouldn't work you'd have needed your recovery key. > it's known they scan all your content and pics on iCloud They can't if you have ADP. > Some tracking less by advertisers? That's privacy? Yes, it is privacy. Let's not understate the massive surveillance that ad networks do, Google included. Google is an advertising company, they have zero incentive to offer the same level of privacy that Apple does and probably never will, it would be directly detrimental to their core business. | | |
| ▲ | lern_too_spel 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Even Google also gives actual E2EE by default for Android backups. Same with Samsung. Others have mentioned that Proton and others do this for services that Apple won't. https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/risks/bac... | | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent [-] | | But not for photos, arguably one of the more important things to a lot of people to be E2EE, and not everyone wants to host their own Immich instance, or do things manually. iCloud offers E2EE photo back up and sync and native apps for it, it's a huge selling point that Google could just as easily offer but willingly choose not to. | | |
| ▲ | lern_too_spel 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > it's a huge selling point that Google could just as easily offer but willingly choose not to. Google Photos is meant for sharing, where E2EE makes little sense. You can search your photos from any device. If you really want to give up that convenience for E2EE, you might as well do it right and use Proton or Ente, which have E2EE for all photos, unlike iCloud, which isn't for shared albums or photos shared to anyone with the link. Unlike iOS, Android lets these apps have access to all the same device APIs as Google Photos, meaning they're as seamlessly integrated as possible. Apple iCloud uses iOS APIs not available to third parties, locking you in to using either a gimpy service or a gimpy app. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | gremlinunderway 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Is there any third-party validation on these claims of E2EE? Everyone keeps asking for some sort of validation or testing to these claims and everyone is just ignoring them. Without some kind of third-party testing none of this matters, anyone can say whatever they want unless someone can do testing to demonstrate its adherence to this. | | |
| ▲ | fragmede 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > As part of our commitment to security assurance, Apple regularly engages with third-party organizations to provide security assurance, certifying and attesting to the security of Apple’s hardware, operating systems, apps, and services. Our goal is to specify certifications that can be recognized by Apple users around the globe. https://support.apple.com/guide/certifications/intro-to-appl... |
| |
| ▲ | epolanski 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Apple's E2EE is less safe than a proper one like Proton's (which also has storage, email, calendar). But one has to drink the Apple propaganda and believe it's true. Also, ADP does not work in UK, at all. The rest of the message I won't even comment. All things that if you care you get easier on any other device. And Apple's ad business is booming while other are stagnant. | | |
| ▲ | cmcaleer 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > Also, ADP does not work in UK, at all. It does work if you've enabled it before it got disabled back in Feb, and the US successfully managed to get the UK to back off its demands for a backdoor, but it remains to be seen if new UK customers will ever be able to enable ADP again. | |
| ▲ | atomicthumbs 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | how is apple's not "proper?" |
|
| |
| ▲ | privacyking 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > 3) once that I forgot my password to the MacBook, all one needed to do to access my data was to enter recovery mode and reset the password. Sure it logged me off from browser sessions, but all my files where there available to anybody Do you not know how computers work? That how it works on every computer without encryption. You wouldn't have been able to access to the data passwordless if you had enabled Filevault encryption | |
| ▲ | wilkinsonsmooth 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Apple's privacy policy is like everything else Apple: it best compares to things outside of it's walled garden. But inside the walls Apple operates just like every other company. It gathers information on all it's users for it's own advertising business. They can claim they don't have third parties involved and that makes them more private, but they do all the same things to their users but just do it themselves. They're as much an advertising company as Google or Facebook (and would love to be as big as those advertisers), but their ads are all within the Apple walls, so they can claim they are much more private. When they really aren't. | | |
| ▲ | newdee 4 days ago | parent [-] | | > They’re as much an advertising company as Google or Facebook They are? By what metric? This sounds made up to support the assertion that a company which doesn’t do broad data sharing with third parties, but keeps it to themselves, is somehow less (or no less) private than those who do. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | observationist 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Apple imposes "Artificial Incompetence" on their users. It treats them like children, gives them no agency, and limits their freedom, all while praising them for their taste and superior sense of... something. This current iteration of Apple lacks the geniuses and visionaries that might have possibly justified their behavior at some point in the past, so you have a soulless corporate churn reinforcing the biggest walled garden in the history of humanity, with no apparent purpose except self perpetuation. Doing things weirdly and badly, and not allowing any other way, prevents skill transfer between operating systems and environments. It prevents easy transfer of software - it forces software to treat the weird and bad things as canonical. Apple users, with their imposed muscle memory, not realizing how good things could and should be, insist on their high taste and discrimination, and point to things "just working" and other inanities as vehement cover for one of the darkest of dark patterns. Interoperability, protocol, and freedom should be mandatory. Google is hardly better, but at least you can own the device you purchase. |
| |
| ▲ | darkhorse222 5 days ago | parent [-] | | If you cannot understand what made Apple successful then or today what makes you think you're not failing to grasp something? You head right on to making an argument when nakedly revealing that you can't comprehend the other side. Not surprising, this site is made for the Woz's of the world (and that's fine!). | | |
| ▲ | rockemsockem 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > This current iteration of Apple lacks the geniuses and visionaries that might have possibly justified their behavior at some point in the past, so you have a soulless corporate churn reinforcing the biggest walled garden in the history of humanity, with no apparent purpose except self perpetuation. My read was that this addressed your point. | |
| ▲ | selcuka 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Not surprising, this site is made for the Woz's of the world (and that's fine!). I'm pretty sure Woz perfectly understands why iPhone has a larger market share. I use a Pixel too, but I can see that an iPhone is more appealing to 80%+ of world's population. | | |
| ▲ | leptons 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Except iPhone doesn't have a larger market share, and they aren't being used by 80% of the world's population. Where are you pulling these numbers from? iPhone only has a larger market share in the US, and not by much. Worldwide they are very small compared to android. | | |
| ▲ | selcuka 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > they aren't being used by 80% of the world's population. I said "iPhone is more appealing to 80%+ of world's population". I didn't say everyone who wants it can afford it. It's pure speculation, of course, but given its current market share (27% of all devices sold) and its price point, I don't think it's too far fetched to say that its market share would be much higher if price wasn't an issue for people. This is somewhat hinted by the fact that it has a 78% market share in the $1,000+ segment [1], and most iPhone models are over $1K. Also it still ships more phones than any other single vendor (unless you lump all Android phones into one bucket). In terms of revenue, it's by far the leader with 43% [2]. [1] https://www.netguru.com/blog/iphone-vs-android-users-differe... [2] https://www.counterpointresearch.com/en/insights/global-smar... | | |
| ▲ | jajko 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Overconfident in your numbers you are, just because they suit your narrative. Zero actual backing for those you provide. Not reflecting reality I can see they are. | | | |
| ▲ | leptons 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | >I said "iPhone is more appealing to 80%+ of world's population". The reality distortion field is alive and well. | | |
| ▲ | selcuka 4 days ago | parent [-] | | You asked "where are you pulling these numbers from?" and I answered. Is this your response? | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | arijun 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Those are some very minor complaints, all of which would not affect my buying choice, given the larger differences. That said, I’ll tell you that I don’t notice (1), for (2) I would never sit there organizing my photos, I have other (mostly less productive) things to do with my time, and (3) seems like something I specifically _dont_ want. |
| |
| ▲ | packetlost 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | No, two of those are some pretty fundamental complaints about how GP wants to use their device. Just because you don't have those complaints doesn't make them any less fundamental. Ultimately the disagreement is primarily on the fact that Apple goes very far out of their way to hide the concept of a file and filesystem from the user. The wobbling one is minor, in all fairness. | | |
| ▲ | gpm 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The wobbling one would be pretty major if you ran into it all the time in your regular workflow... | | |
| ▲ | packetlost 5 days ago | parent [-] | | It's easily solvable with a case. I agree that it's silly that Apple does it this way, but I struggle to see how it rises to the level of being a fundamental flaw like file management is. | | |
| ▲ | Ruthalas 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The wobble actually factors onto my device choice as well. It's just annoying to live with for the life of the phone if you can't find a case that widens it, which many don't. | | |
| ▲ | dpkirchner 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Casetify makes decent cases that make the super annoying bump less annoying. My iPhone 13 Pro's bump is now more like 1mm, effectively. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | tshaddox 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Absolutely. The camera bump is a complete non-issue, and probably easily solvable with a case if it's really the thing pushing you away from an entire smartphone platform. I shudder at notion of feeling compelled to group every photo I take into exactly one folder. A directory tree makes very little sense for organizing everyday photos. If I for some reason had a natural temptation to do this, I'd be grateful to Apple for discouraging it in their Photos app. | | |
| ▲ | makeitdouble 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > solvable with a case The iphone 16's camera bump is 3.5mm. Short of making your own case that makes the bump a Pixel like bar, that wont be solved by just sticking a case. On photos, it is indeed a very personal topic to many. In particular someone taking dozens of random pictures everyday won't have the same use case as someone being a lot more deliberate for each picture for instance. A one size fjts all approach isn't helpful IMHO. | | |
| ▲ | ars 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > The iphone 16's camera bump is 3.5mm. Why even have a bump? Make the phone thicker by exactly that amount and increase the battery. Then the phone is flat and has a better battery life. Are there uses who actually prefer a bump? | | |
| ▲ | makeitdouble 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > Are there users who actually prefer a bump? Speaking for myself, I'm fine with it on Pixel phones. I'd be happy with more battery and no bump if: - phone makers gave up on the glass backs and metal, and made the body plastic (no more "premium" feel for the sake of it, I don't want heavy and fragile materials) - the physical durability was balanced with the additional weight: dropping the phone the wrong angle shouldn't mean a guaranteed cracked screen. The current Pixel9a would be near perfect balance for me, if they gave it better cameras and internals instead of making it a budget phone. | |
| ▲ | SirMaster 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't want a phone that would be as heavy as you suggest. I have 0 issue with current battery life. Like others a case has always made the bump a complete non-issue for me. My iPhone has never wobbles when laid back down on a table. | |
| ▲ | infthi 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Motorola did some A/B testing in 2011 with Droid RAZR and Droid RAZR MAXX. They had identical hardware, but first one was the thin one with a camera bump, second one was uniformly thick (thus no bump) and put an extra battery there (which doubled the capacity). Given that 3 years later they have stopped producing phones with bumps, I guess people really prefer battery to bumps ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | frollogaston 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | 3) reminds me of the web USB thing, totally do not want |
|
|
| ▲ | mvieira38 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Is this a "left brain vs right brain" type of thing? Do most HNers prefer Androids? I don't think so. The stuff you mentioned is objectively better as there's no reason for Apple not to let you do it. It's more of a "I've been in the Apple walled garden for so long and so are all my friends" or the so-called network effects. Examples: you can't "Facetime" and "Airdrop" on Android, your text confirmation marks are green instead of blue, you don't have access to the same apps as your friends (sometimes), you don't have integration with iPad. If you grew up in certain circles you may be bullied for not having an iPhone, too. Also there is a prevailing sentiment that Android doesn't "just work" as much as iOS, which is true tbh but not for Pixels which are basically the Android equivalent of an iPhone, where the device is pretty much tailor-made for the OS. |
| |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | There’s still an element of subjective preference, as much as many like to say otherwise. To me, Android animations and gestures have always felt less polished and natural and more rough “forever prototype” and mechanistic, for example. In terms of “just working,” a big weak point of Android that stands out to me is just how clunky it is if you’re not neck-deep in the Google ecosystem and use more standardized service providers like FastMail. iOS stock apps work great with IMAP, CardDAV, CalDAV, etc but on Android you have to hunt down third party service agnostic apps for everything, few of which are designed to work with each other. To be fair though, Windows also suffers this issue. | | |
| ▲ | poolnoodle 5 days ago | parent [-] | | You can just add IMAP accounts to the Gmail app but generally you're right. |
| |
| ▲ | SirMaster 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For me, it's how can I get the slick and super convenient integrations between my phone, tablet, and laptop outside of Apple? I am talking about Handoff, Continuity, iPhone mirroring (can use my iPhone and its apps while it remains locked somewhere), AirDrop, Continuity Camera, universal clipboard, iMessage, etc. | |
| ▲ | omikun 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I worked at Samsung and even there a third of the team had iPhones. | |
| ▲ | gowld 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Logical analysis, like using folders and file APIs, is "left-brained". | | |
| ▲ | andybak 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The left/right brain thing is pseudo-science and even worse - a false dichotomy. It's much more about cultural snobbery and cultural tribalism around which pursuits are regarded as "more worthy". Look up C.P. Snow's "The Two Cultures" - it was incredibly influential at the time but also described a prejudice we still labour under. It's pervasive in the English speaking world. I suspect less so in the non-anglosphere West and possibly even less so in Asia. | | |
| ▲ | monkeyelite 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > The left/right brain thing is pseudo-science It's real in terms of consciousness - brains switch between modes depending on activity. You can try it and feel the switch yourself. Whether that switch is localized, or whether people have more affinity for one than the other is probably what's fake. | | |
| ▲ | andybak 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I think we're talking about different things. I'm referring to the "logical vs intuitive" character type distinction. | | |
| ▲ | monkeyelite 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Agreed. Im just saying the origin of those terms is a distortion of a real effect. In your “right brained” mode you are more intuitive. So then people said I’m a “right brained” person. | | |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | jama211 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | This is such a redditor comment |
| |
| ▲ | jama211 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | “There’s no reason for apple to not let you do it” - they have reasons. Whether you agree with them or not is fine but pretending they don’t have reasons is a little silly. You also can’t put every option in for everything, because simplicity has value too. |
|
|
| ▲ | pier25 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've been using Android for years but for reasons recently switched to an iPhone. I gotta say Android is superior in a number of things like call and SMS spam. Also typing on iOS is a frustrating experience. I type "Im" and the iOS keyboard won't offer "I'm" as a correction option. I've even tried using the Google Keyboard on iOS and the multilingual predictions are just not as good as on Android. I would have preferred to get a Pixel but Google doesn't distribute their physical products where I live. |
| |
| ▲ | jpalawaga 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The keyboard is completely nonsensical. I really don't understand how iPhone keyboard is so bad. Even if you install the Google Keyboard, iPhone keyboard is still bad. I can't fathom what is going on here, but I really dislike typing on an iPhone. It drives me bananas. Completely obvious suggestions are never made. Android--you can just faceroll on the keyboard a bit and it'll have everything perfect. I thought I was really good at fast text input on mobile devices until I switched to an iPhone and then realized that Google's ML and autocorrect integration is just way better in this area. | | |
| ▲ | frollogaston 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I've been using iPhones since the original, somewhere around the iPhone 6 they screwed up the keyboard and never fixed it. Not just the recommendations but even the typing itself. | |
| ▲ | pier25 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | On Android I rarely had typos (and never used autocorrect) but on iOS I make constant mistakes. And I mean constant. It's rare when I type a word without a typo. | | |
| ▲ | makeitdouble 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | FTWIW the keys' hitboxes aren't at the displayed area, but at the expected landing area. I'm slightly making up the exact bias, but for instance it will be assumed the user lands a touch slightly above the actual key, as the finger hides the target and Apple's heuristics expect some overshooting. In comparison people used to the iPhone's heuristics might have a harder time on android. | | |
| ▲ | pier25 5 days ago | parent [-] | | If this is true it seems like a terrible idea. And even worse that it can't be disabled. Does this happen with all iOS keyboards? | | |
| |
| ▲ | JamesSwift 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I had the exact same experience when switching to iphone. Hasnt gotten better after... 4 years now? It actually seems to be getting worse, if anything. |
|
| |
| ▲ | 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | SirMaster 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I just tried this on my iPhone, and as soon as I press the space bar after typing Im, it adds the apostrophe automatically FWIW. | |
| ▲ | DANmode 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Being dumb is cute on iOS. |
|
|
| ▲ | dismalaf 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I prefer Pixel phones, for slightly different reasons. One, it takes really good photos. Better than phones with supposedly better specs. This is big for me, I have a 3 year old, being able to snap photos that look great with no effort is huge. Two, the Google integration is just really a gamechanger. My laptop is my "computing" device. So my phone is mostly for calling, navigating (I travel a lot), searching for businesses, that sort of thing. It's really effortless with Pixel devices, takes a tad more work with other brands. All browsers are equal citizens. I use Vivaldi, it's nice it can be the default and work just as well with the phone as Chrome. And finally, in all my dealings with big tech over my lifetime, Google has been the only one that I feel doesn't try to abuse users. With MS it's endless nagging and annoyances, plus their security sucks, with Apple they're very anti-consumer unless you do exactly what they want, all the time. Even Samsung annoyed me with bloatware and trying to make their apps default over and over. If I change something on a Pixel phone, it stays changed. I pay for some Google products so no ads for the most part. Their security is great. They prefer open formats and protocols and have done a ton for the open web. Just the best ecosystem I've bought into. |
|
| ▲ | SwamyM 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > 2: When I sort my photos on a Pixel, I sort them in folders. The "camera" folder is where the unsorted photos are. When I sit in a bus or in a cafe, I go through it and sort the new photos into folders. This seems impossible on iPhones. Everything stays in the main folder forever. You can add photos to albums, but that does not remove them from the main folder. So there is no way to know which photos I have already sorted. This along with iOS dumping pictures from WhatsApp, etc. into your main pictures folder is such a huge deal breaker for me. If I am backing up my pictures to a hard drive, there is no easy way to select just the pictures taken on my phone. Seems like such an oversight but I suspect it's a way to drive people to sign up for iCloud storage. |
| |
| ▲ | odo1242 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > This along with iOS dumping pictures from WhatsApp, etc. into your main pictures folder is such a huge deal breaker for me. This is WhatsApp's fault. "Settings > Chats > Save To Photos OFF" should fix it | | |
| ▲ | ars 5 days ago | parent [-] | | That doesn't fix it, that just means I don't see WhatsApp photos. I want the two photos in different places. | | |
| ▲ | odo1242 a day ago | parent [-] | | How does Android fix that? | | |
| ▲ | ars a day ago | parent [-] | | Android has directories (folders), and it doesn't pretend they don't exist. If you go to "Collections" -> "Photos on Device" it then shows separate folders "Camera", "WhatsApp Videos", "WhatsApp Photos", "Screenshots", etc, etc. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | antgiant 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | iOS 26 fixes this with an option to only show photos not in an album. Additionally, if you are backing up photos to a hard drive you will be much better off using an app like PhotoSync. It has a one time payment and transfers direct to whatever you want with far less errors and more control than Apple’s terrible buggy disaster that is transferring photos by wire. | | |
| ▲ | radicality 5 days ago | parent [-] | | It’s actually already available in iOS 18! On the main Photos page, click the little filtering icon and select something like “Not in any album” |
| |
| ▲ | hammock 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I can’t believe there isn’t a fix for this. I thought I was the only person with these problems. How have they persisted for so long? | |
| ▲ | frollogaston 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The inability to sync albums as folders onto my Mac is my #1 complaint about iPhones. It's probably to sell iCloud. | |
| ▲ | nielsbot 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Isn't that something WhatsApp is specifically doing tho? I haven't seen this behavior. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | hattar 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I use an iphone and have for many years. I was a phone geek who would always use custom ROMs and have everything dialed in just so. I'm sure this has changed over the years but back in the day it seemed like there was always some weird issue with my Android phone. Admittedly, a lot of that could have been my fault for constantly messing with the device. Eventually I got busy and just needed my phone to do the simple stuff and get out of the way. iOS has a number of really annoying behaviors and general flaws that are never going to be addressed. I don't recall having the same frustrations with Android, but maybe I did. I'm constantly annoyed that my iPhone can't do simple stuff my Android phone could do 15 years ago. I am also aware that if it could do all those things, I probably wouldn't spend the time to get everything set up, dialed in, and maintained anyway. The things that keep me on iPhone are unrelated to all of that, though. 1. I like the small form factor. I have a 13 Mini and there's no decent equivalent that I've found in any ecosystem (sadly, even Apple now). 2. I use Facetime with both sets of parents a fair bit. Trying to train them to use whatever app Google currently uses for video calls, and then retraining every time Google kills it off for another almost identical app, sounds like a lot of work and frustration. 3. Real or not, my perception is that privacy in the Apple ecosystem has historically been, and currently is, far better than Google. I don't like the idea of the device I'm constantly relying on to be the product of an ad company, it just feels gross. 4. Proper unlock with FaceID is so damn convenient. I don't know for sure, but suspect going back to a fingerprint would really bug me. |
| |
| ▲ | Zak 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > Trying to train them to use whatever app Google currently uses for video calls, and then retraining every time Google kills it off for another almost identical app This seems like an argument for picking something third-party, perhaps Signal. It's probably not going away any time soon, and it supports both major mobile operating systems. | | |
| ▲ | lotsofpulp 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | 12 to 15 years ago, when I was teaching the elders in the family how to video call, there were only two reliable options, Google and Apple. Google kept changing their solution, so we ended up with Facetime. Whatsapp did end up coming out with video calls, and Whatsapp would have been an alternative had it been available on iPads sooner (is it even available today?). Signal also came out too late. But once everyone was trained on Facetime, I, nor any of my cousins was going to put in the time to re-train on any other solution. Plus, if anyone has a problem with Facetime, or their Apple device, they can pop into an Apple store to get it fixed themselves. Or they can chat with an Apple tech support rep who can remote into their phone. | |
| ▲ | no_wizard 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | both iOS and Facetime are super slick and baked into the device. The end user doesn't even have to really know how to the app to use the feature as it were. It shows up on a contact as a button click. Signal does not, even on Android. You have to deliberately use it. That small friction isn't great when you're likely one of few people using it in day to day life of others. FaceTime on the other hand, just works | | |
| ▲ | crtasm 5 days ago | parent [-] | | When I view a contact on Android there are options for Signal message/call/video call. This is on LineageOS. | | |
| ▲ | warkdarrior 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Does that mean Signal has access to my contacts? So much for privacy! | | |
| ▲ | odo1242 5 days ago | parent [-] | | It does not, actually. Signal only gets the contact number if you click on the button. | | |
| ▲ | crtasm 3 days ago | parent [-] | | In my case I allowed Signal to access my contacts and these options only appear for people who use it, don't know what happens if you deny the access. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | taco_emoji 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Pixel has had face unlock since at least Pixel 7 | | |
| ▲ | Grazester 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Only the pixel 4 had face unlock that used IR hardware instead of camera nonsense that isn't as secure or reliable. Edit. It seems like pixel 7 and up includes something that's more secure |
| |
| ▲ | NoMoreNicksLeft 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >Proper unlock with FaceID is so damn convenient. I don't know for sure, but suspect going back to a fingerprint would really bug me. Being able to unlock my password manager with the fingerprint, rather than putting in the vault password every time was great, but my iPhone got too old for the other apps I needed and now I'm stuck typing in a gibberish 30-char password every time I need to use it on my phone. When are we going to get under-the-screen fingerprint sensors? | | | |
| ▲ | mnky9800n 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I miss having a small phone. My iPhone 16 ironically seems small compared to lots of phones my friends have. But I wish they bring back the mini. I would buy it immediately. | | |
| ▲ | ggreer 5 days ago | parent [-] | | You can buy a mini on secondary markets. Some are even new in box, though you might need to replace the battery. Until about a year ago, Apple had 13 minis in their refurb store.[1] That's where I managed to get one. I'm going to hang on to it as long as possible. Previously I had an iPhone SE (the one that looks like an iPhone 5), and I still slightly regret upgrading to the mini. The mini's camera and display are significantly better, but it's a little wide for my hands. 1. https://www.apple.com/shop/refurbished/iphone |
| |
| ▲ | dismalaf 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Trying to train them to use whatever app Google currently uses for video calls Everyone I know uses Facebook Messenger or WhatsApp these days. Both of which are cross platform, even web (so can use on a desktop browser). Also, the current Google thing, Meet, doesn't need the person you're calling to have the app. You invite them, they get a link, it opens in their browser, mobile or desktop. | |
| ▲ | paulgerhardt 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How’s your 13 mini holding up? I have a recently refurbished one (6 months old) and I can’t make it to 2pm without recharging. Additional my mail search and photo search broke with Apple Intelligence/iOS18 integration. Debating jumping ship to a epaper phone or holding out for the rumored iPhone Air. | | |
| ▲ | mikepurvis 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | My 13 mini is also not great on battery. I've been debating ordering an iFixit battery and doing the swap, but in the past I've felt it was kind of mixed results from that. I don't think those batteries are newly manufactured units, but rather leftovers from the original production line that have been sitting on the shelf for 2-3 years. So although they'll be an improvement over one that's been through 1-2k cycles, they won't be like it was when it was brand new. For now I'm just making do with having a power bank in my bag when I'm out and about. | |
| ▲ | hattar 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't think the iPhone Air will actually be smaller in the dimensions I care about, just thinner which I assume will compromise battery life. My mini is holding up ok. Battery needs replacing but I haven't done it. Like mikepurvis, I carry power banks around if I'm doing anything where I'm not going to be able to recharge easily. I use one like this https://www.amazon.com/Anker-PowerCore-Magnetic-Slim-B2C/dp/... | | | |
| ▲ | subculture 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I was able to get a new battery and screen for my 13 mini via AppleCare, but even the new battery won't get me through the day. Recent OS updates also make my camera shooting experience really slow for some reason. Even with all that, I'm keeping the mini as long as possible because every year brings bigger and heavier iPhones. | | |
| ▲ | lostlogin 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > Recent OS updates also make my camera shooting experience really slow for some reason. I’m on a 16 pro and it’s bad. It’s worse if I use the side button or do it from lock Screen, quicker from actual camera app. However it’s by far the slowest camera I’ve had on an iPhone, and I find the speed and quality a disappointing. |
| |
| ▲ | sometimes_all 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I have a 13 mini for about 3 years now - still holding up for most of the working day (about 15 hours). The trick is to reduce the number of apps you have on the phone, reduce the number of apps which like running on the background, and not watch a lot of videos. I figured it out that treating it as a communication device + payments device + maps + very occasional content viewer, ie mostly as a utility will make the phone last much longer. | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I’m on a 12 mini and it lasts all day easily. I generally like the phone except it’s a little too big. |
| |
| ▲ | rezonant 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > 4. Proper unlock with FaceID is so damn convenient. I don't know for sure, but suspect going back to a fingerprint would really bug me. On this last point, Pixel's face unlock has been secure enough to use for banking/NFC transactions since Pixel 8. | |
| ▲ | klabb3 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Proper unlock with FaceID is so damn convenient Except when you’re trying to pay with NFC and have to awkwardly tilt your phone to match your face. | |
| ▲ | therein 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | FaceID is terrible, not even reliable. It scans your face all the time, even when you are not unlocking it. Every 20-30 seconds or so, let's just scan your face. I would love it if iPhones stayed with fingerprint unlock. Sometimes I put the phone on the desk and not pointing it to my face and I want to unlock it. I have to wait for the stupid FaceID timeout to be able to input my code. | | |
| ▲ | t0md4n 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Face ID is not terrible. Especially on newer phones which support landscape rotation etc. They check to see if you’re looking at the screen and your eyes are open, so they can keep the screen on regardless of the auto lock setting. It’s a smart and useful feature which you can turn off if you don’t like it. | | |
| ▲ | therein 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > It’s a smart and useful feature which you can turn off if you don’t like it. If they hadn't gotten rid of the fingerprint sensor, I'd believe in the sincerity of that statement. > It is not terrible The fingerprint sensor was at the perfect location, it worked perfectly. FaceID has the downsides I have outlined and therefore in my opinion absolutely terrible. > Especially on newer phones which support landscape rotation etc. I don't understand how you could say "newer phones which support landscape rotation" in 2025 with a straight face. Even iPod Touch 2G supported landscape rotation. The rotation doesn't help anyway, it is technically capable of detecting it is sitting still on my desk but it still does the FaceID dance first before showing me the passcode prompt which I also don't appreciate along with scanning my face every 30 seconds even when unlocked. If it can scan it so rapidly, why not show me the passcode prompt or design the UX better so that I can already input my passcode before waiting for the device to decide it sees no face in there? It can do it better but by design it is too eager to just perform the FaceID unlock and then turn itself into a user presence and attention sensor. I'd easily pay $100 extra for an iPhone that didn't solely rely on FaceID to log me in and instead gave me a fingerprint sensor it had from generations ago. | | |
| ▲ | Sohcahtoa82 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > I don't understand how you could say "newer phones which support landscape rotation" in 2025 with a straight face. Even iPod Touch 2G supported landscape rotation. Waiting for the day when Apple announces supporting recording videos horizontally and the Apple fanatics to go wild as they show off how amazing videos can be when the view is wider than it is tall. | |
| ▲ | t0md4n 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Just not true though is it? Touch ID had a ton of downsides. It didn’t work with wet or dirty fingers, didn’t work with gloves, if you have clammy hands it would constantly fail. Plus it has a higher false positive rate than Face ID and has less features. Not to mention the speed and UX of Face ID is significantly better for MOST people than Touch ID. I also meant landscape Face ID recognition, obviously not landscape device orientation. | |
| ▲ | maxwellito 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I remember my iPhone, on my desk, turning up because of a notification, then hearing the vibration for a failed FaceID unlock. This very smart system wasn't able to understand that it was looking at a ceiling. So I always ended up having to type my password due to too many failed FaceID attempts.
FaceID was highly ranked in the reasons why I disliked iPhones. TouchID all the way. On an iPad, it's fantastic. |
|
| |
| ▲ | atomicthumbs 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | turn off "attention aware features" under accessibility -> Face ID & Attention if you don't like it checking whether you're looking at it |
| |
| ▲ | mikepurvis 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm also holding tight on an iPhone 13 Mini (5.18 in x 2.53 in) and I'm honestly not thrilled that even that is a size up from the 5s (4.87 in x 2.31 in). Pixel 10 is yet another step up, at 6.02 in x 2.83 in, and I just wish it didn't have to be that way. |
|
|
| ▲ | haspok 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > 3: On Android I can use Chrome. On Android I can use Firefox (with uBlock Origin, and the ability to play Youtube videos in the background or with the screen locked). There, I corrected it for you. |
| |
| ▲ | nielsbot 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The Vinegar extension on macOS/iOS lets you use the system video player on YouTube. (It has a few glitches but works fine and let's you use PiP and play videos with the screen locked.) | |
| ▲ | jahnu 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I’m a reluctant iPhone user (nobody seems to be making music on Android and we make plugins) and I use Brave on it and have those features. |
|
|
| ▲ | coldpie 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I prefer Android. Unlike iPhone, the Android notifications system actually makes sense, and I can use real Firefox on Android. But, I prefer phones sized to fit in a human hand even more, so I'm stuck on an iPhone 13 Mini. Please make a ~4.5" screen Pixel phone, Google :( |
| |
| ▲ | Fishkins 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah, the main news I want to hear is the release of smaller Pixel phone. Secondarily, I'd like the return of the 3.5mm port. I don't care about any of the stuff they actually announce. I do currently use a Pixel, but I hate how big it is. | | |
| ▲ | nielsbot 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | You prefer wired to non-wired headphones? | | |
| ▲ | pavo-etc 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I prefer to have the option. There are many sound systems i'd like to use that are wired only. |
| |
| ▲ | coldpie 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Eh, I've gotten over the headphone jack thing. I just buy a dozen adapters, stick one on each of my headphones, and replace them as they wear out every couple months. Good enough. | | |
| ▲ | Fishkins 5 days ago | parent [-] | | It isn't nearly as big of an issue as the phone size, but it is still a nuisance. I know there's no chance of it ever coming back, but I'd like it to. I still have a small amount of hope that someone will make a modern, well supported ~5" Android phone. But that's also feeling less likely. |
|
| |
| ▲ | jpalawaga 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | iPhone notifications are leagues behind. Everyone you see with an iPhone has like 80 notifications--mostly stemming from how and when they're dismissed. | | |
| ▲ | maxwellito 5 days ago | parent [-] | | +1 SO MUCH
After two years I couldn't understand them. Sometime one notification appear, then it disappear, is it in the bottom stack? No, it just disappear.
Also when there's many of them grouped, will tapping expand them? open the app? It's random. But mostly, on Android, having quick actions on notifications. Receiving a useless email? The "Delete" action is right there. Boom, done. Move on. In retrospect, I think it's why I find Android so functional. Just from the notifications you can do everything. No need to unlock your phone and end up distracted. |
| |
| ▲ | maxwellito 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I just switched from an iPhone 13 mini to a Pixel 9 Pro, and it's tough to admit but I can do so much more with my thumb on a big Android than a tiny iPhone. Mostly due to the back gesture always works (never need to tap the top left corner in some cases, and also being able to return to the 3 button navigation) and being able to pull down the notifications by sliding down on the main screen. | |
| ▲ | zeagle 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | So true. I switched from a lineage of several pixels ending in 7 to an iPhone for various reasons. The only thing I really miss outside of niche apps after finding a better calendar is a sane notification system! iOs lock screen notifications provide so little useful information and sometimes get buried. | |
| ▲ | javier2 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | 13 Mini, best phone ever made :( | | |
|
|
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’d prefer the photo organization behavior you describe, but I don’t want websites to ever be dipping into the local filesystem outside of heavily siloed areas reserved for web apps exclusively. I don’t want the browser to even be capable of it, because regardless of what permissions and security measures are put in place, someone is going to find a way around them. The only exception I can see making for filesystem access is for PWAs explicitly installed by the user, and even then there should be restrictions in place like limiting access to scripts loaded from the installed PWA’s domain. The open web in a generalized browser like Chrome on the other hand is too untrustworthy. As for camera bumps, they’re all equally awful and I’d rather they just disappear entirely, even if that means thicker devices. |
| |
| ▲ | Rohansi 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > I don’t want the browser to even be capable of it, because regardless of what permissions and security measures are put in place, someone is going to find a way around them. You surely trust the permissions and security measures your phone provides to apps so what makes browsers worse in this area? Especially if you're using iOS where you only have Apple's web browser available to use. | | |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Intent. Apps can only ever be installed by me, barring complicated exploit chains, while browsers can navigate without any input from me whatsoever. That serves as an extremely narrow funnel that vastly reduces surface area. This is also why I’m more receptive to installed PWAs being more capable. They’re both on the other side of my intent funnel and assuming a good implementation can’t ever navigate to domains that aren’t that PWA. Besides that, it’s just annoying for apps to be dressed in browser chrome. On macOS ever since Safari added the ability to install sites as PWAs, I’ve been making heavy use of those just to remove extraneous browser toolbar items and such. I don’t know how people can live with all their web apps in regular browser tabs, I’d go nuts. | | |
| ▲ | Rohansi 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Sure, browsers can navigate without your input, but what good would that do to bypass permissions? You can't use that to automatically grant your website permissions. And permissions are isolated to specific domains as if they were separate apps, so you can't just use permissions granted on domain A from domain B. Not everything needs to be a PWA. Yes, they're great alternatives to apps, but why should anyone be forced to install a PWA when they might only need to use the web app very infrequently? Or what if I just wanted to try some functionality out first? Installing is an unnecessary speed bump for these cases. | | |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Like I said, it’s surface area. It’s much larger in the case of the web since there’s any number of scenarios in which a user’s browser can be coaxed into running code that exploits a vulnerability that bypasses permissions and isolation (which is always possible by virtue of the browser being a privileged app, whether there are known exploits or not). This sort of thing can happen with installed apps too, but the likelihood overall is far lower, especially if selecting judiciously. The overwhelming majority of web apps don’t need filesystem access or similar special functionality, and thus users aren’t forced to install them. In my personal experience, if my interest level in an app is so low that I wasn’t willing to install it, I was never going to use it in the first place either because the app wasn’t compelling enough or I didn’t have any actual need for it. | | |
| ▲ | Rohansi 5 days ago | parent [-] | | You have the same risks with apps though. An operating system has an even larger surface area. Sure, you need to manually install apps, but once installed they will automatically update. Personally I would trust browser security far more than an OS simply because it is a much more desirable target to compromise. They're also built specifically to run untrusted code. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | dsr_ 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's so strange that we don't have cameras which have write-only access to the image spool, galleries that have read-only access to the image spool, and a file manager app that can handle delete requests from other applications with the intent system. |
|
|
| ▲ | bsimpson 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I switched to Android when Google gave me an HTC EVO at that year's Google I/O. The deciding factors were: - The large, high-res screen was way prettier. - It had access to the whole internet, including Flash. - The kickstand was handy. (minor, but still a nudge) Android also had 3rd party keyboards with swipe-typing years before Apple did. I think Android has always been the preferred platform for tinkerers. |
| |
| ▲ | nfriedly 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I miss HTC. They made some of the best phones, and they were always easy to put custom ROMs on. |
|
|
| ▲ | abraxas 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Wobble or no wobble, I really want the camera tumours to disappear. Make the phones thicker or make the cameras more slender. Don't make these ugly protrusions. Those phones are 2cm thick anyway you're not fooling anyone with "thinness" when they still have those massive hunchbacks. |
| |
| ▲ | brookst 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Optics say you’re not getting thinner cameras. Otherwise they’d do that, and all those foot-long lenses you see at sports events would just be phones. Given thickness constraints at the lens,‘I don’t see any reason to make the rest of the phone that thick. Why? Extra battery and nearly double the weight of the phone? Empty space? Cord storage? | | |
| ▲ | therein 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Sell a version of the phone that's 3 generations behind on camera tech, make it a little cheaper or make it the same price. I promise you I would buy it over your flagship if it means no camera tumor. I am okay capturing daily moments I use my phone camera for at a lower fidelity than the bleeding edge optics and sensors offer. I have mirrorless cameras and DSLRs for photos I care to take at a good quality anyway. Not to even mention with all the latest generation post processing done on photos automatically by phone cameras, I don't like how they turn out most of the time at this point. | | |
| ▲ | Sohcahtoa82 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > Sell a version of the phone that's 3 generations behind on camera tech, make it a little cheaper or make it the same price. I promise you I would buy it over your flagship if it means no camera tumor. Two things: 1. Your desire is in a minority that would not be profitable to cater to. 2. Even if they tried, half the people sharing your opinion still wouldn't buy it. So many people claim they want something, but then don't buy it even when it's offered. I remember in 2011 being sad that physical slide-out QWERTY keyboards were disappearing and seeing some poll that showed that like 60% of smartphone users wish they had a physical keyboard, yet nobody was buying the Motorola Droid series which had them, opting instead for the sleek-looking iPhone. People complained about phones losing the headphone jack or getting a notch or hole punch in the screen for the front-facing camera, and yet they bought the phones anyways. | |
| ▲ | brookst 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | But why sell something people won’t buy? I’m not a hardcore capitalist but there are enough phone manufacturers that someone would be doing this if it was profitable. It’s unfortunate to have taste enough standard deviations out that nobody caters to it, but there’s no point in arguing that “someone” should. They just won’t. |
|
| |
| ▲ | izacus 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Google sells you such a phone. It's called Pixel 9a. |
|
|
| ▲ | meowkit 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As someone who prefers iphones… - iPhone wobble is real. Mostly mitigated by a proper case. Does the iPhone get a better camera in return? Usually in my experience. - I don’t sort my photos. The semantic search has been sufficient, and I back everything up to my NAS via an iCloud docker shim. - Chrome/chromium is adware garbage now. FireFox is the only browser I use. The FS API does sound great though. Enviable given how annoying it is to do work on an iPhone sometimes. |
| |
| ▲ | gpm 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > - Chrome/chromium is adware garbage now. FireFox is the only browser I use This is actually one of the stronger arguments in favour of Android's though, you can install (real) firefox and (fully functional) ublock origin, while Apple prevents you from doing so on their non-macos products. | | |
| ▲ | littlecranky67 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Safari on iOS worldwide supports extensions. There is UBlock origin lite and i.e vinagre for youtube background videos. I am still amazed google does not allow extensions on their default browser. | |
| ▲ | benbristow 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Microsoft Edge on Android now also supports some extensions, one being uBlock Origin. Seems just as powerful as the real thing. And has the benefit of using the Chrome engine. | |
| ▲ | AtlasBarfed 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Firefox on Android isn't just a reskin of chrome? When did that change? | | |
| ▲ | gpm 5 days ago | parent [-] | | It never was. There was firefox lite 2018-2021 that was apparently, but going back to 2010 Firefox was Firefox. |
|
| |
| ▲ | izacus 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Pixel phones have won blind camera tests last few years without Apple coming close though. | | |
| ▲ | nomel 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | This is tricky. Most Android phones apply heavy color saturation and contrast adjustments, by default, to the images and the display itself, where iPhone tends to keep things more "raw". But, "pop" is what the average person usually prefers. It's post processing step that can heavily influence favor, unrelated to the camera. The Samsung cameras are still objectively better though, in many metrics. My work involves showing images accurately on screens, and I always have dig through all the settings to make the Android phones just to show an image without heavy modification (for Samsung, it's 3 separate settings!). There is no such setting for iPhone, where the default experience is a (literally) color calibrated screen. | |
| ▲ | RankingMember 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In my view Pixels have been dominating in still photos for years but their video has never been on par with iPhone. I'd put my old Pixel 3's still camera up against my iPhone 13 any day (if my Pixel hadn't bricked itself a little out of warranty like all of mine seemed to). | |
| ▲ | hbn 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The difference between the photos on any flagship phone for the past 5 or so years is insignificant and mostly up to personal preference, but the difference between iPhone and anything else in videos is massive. | |
| ▲ | tshaddox 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is because iPhone photos are ubiquitous which causes photos from less common phones to stand out. And the less common phones likely optimize for this A/B test scenario by e.g. increasing contrast and saturation. Meanwhile Apple likely has little to no interest in optimizing for A/B tests with minor smartphone players, and instead optimizes merely for delivering satisfying photos in the widest range of scenarios. Pixel photos are very good too, for the record. I just think the "blind camera test" is worthless. | | |
| ▲ | shaklee3 5 days ago | parent [-] | | That's quite an interesting way to explain why Apple does poorly in blind tests. The real reason though is that Apple's cameras are just not as good, but I suppose it's easier to explain away by making up biases. | | |
| ▲ | tshaddox 5 days ago | parent [-] | | My and your personal preferences for one camera over the other isn't the issue. Nor am I claiming that one is objectively better than another. My point is that blind tests (between two cameras of similar quality) are worthless simply because they don't reflect the preferences the test-taker would actually have given extensive use of each camera. The issues with blind tests like this are well-known. I assure you I have no interest in persuading you to alter your own preferences. |
|
| |
| ▲ | jama211 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For pictures but not for video, the stabilisation is better on iOS typically | | |
| ▲ | tick_tock_tick 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Stabilization is about to all become post processing AI based and if we know there is only thing Apple sucks at now a days it's software. | | |
| ▲ | jama211 5 days ago | parent [-] | | There’s huge value in having proper optical stabilisation, even if you’re using AI better input will still equal better output. |
|
| |
| ▲ | SirMaster 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | What if I personally don't tend to agree with most people over what constitutes a good looking photo? |
| |
| ▲ | toephu2 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I back everything up to my NAS via an iCloud docker shim As someone who refuses to pay extra for iCloud storage, can you tell me how to do this?
I haven't figured out a good (read: easy) way to backup photos from my iPhone to computer/external storage (I don't want to use iTunes software cause I don't need everything syncing both ways). | | |
| ▲ | frollogaston 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Image Capture used to be the simple way, but they removed the "delete imported items from phone" option and made it default instead now, which is quite the landmine. | |
| ▲ | zeagle 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'd be curious too. Family fills up iCloud very quickly. I use a self hosted immich instance on my nas to back photos up and share with family members. | |
| ▲ | SirMaster 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Have you tried the app PhotoSync? It has tons of options to automatically back up all your iPhone photos to somewhere. |
| |
| ▲ | vunderba 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I was under the impression that every browser running on iOS was just backed by WebKit - so it's basically just a firefox skin. | |
| ▲ | m_a_g 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Try Brave on iOS. Adblock that works, and for free. |
|
|
| ▲ | jamesponddotco 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I can sort my photos in folders (or albums) in iOS, not sure what you mean? I can have personal and shared albums, unless you mean the fact you don’t have that in the filesystem, in which case I completely agree. I’m a Firefox guy myself and web apps are not something I care about for privacy reasons, but I agree that not having the option is a bummer. The camera bump never really bothered me on the iPhone or the Pixel Fold I had before this iPhone. I just don’t notice it, but then again, I also didn’t notice the crease in the fold. I miss Tachiyomi though. Panels is nice, but I had to built a whole OPDS-proxy to a manga website to have something close to Tachiyomi. Oh, and the ability to turn off network access on a per-application basis that came with GrapheneOS (plus the security of GrapheneOS itself). While I prefer Android and Pixels (using GrapheneOS), I have switched my family to the Apple ecosystem to have a middle ground between privacy and features, so I’m not coming from an “I love Apple and everything else sucks” background, mind you. |
| |
| ▲ | afavour 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I think OP is describing using their main Photos album as an inbox of sorts, emptying it out by filing photos away. On iOS even when you add a photo to an album it still exists in the main album. | | |
| ▲ | lnsru 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I just went into trades and I do a picture every other hour of my work. It really makes me mad, that I can’t properly separate this photo-documentation from my personal private pictures. It’s a complete mess now in the main folder… Next phone will be one with GrapheneOS. | | |
| ▲ | 9dev 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Kind of sounds like your actual problem is not having separate devices for personal and work usage? |
| |
| ▲ | jamesponddotco 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ah, yeah, that makes sense. I simply ignore the main view and go straight to the albums. In iOS 26 it defaults to your last view, so that works for me. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | LeafItAlone 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I use an iPhone. 1. I’m always going to have a case on my phone, so I don’t care about the camera bump. 2. You’re correct here. I mostly don’t care, but I want to have different hidden folders, which iOS doesn’t natively have. Otherwise I don’t care much. 3. Safari’s locked-down-ness is precisely why I use it. But TBH, at this point, there’s minimal differences between iOS and Android. |
|
| ▲ | m463 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I can understand point #1 - 99% of people put a case on their phone - the more thickness you have for the camera (sensor+lens), the better you can make the optical design. (bigger sensor, more range of focus, etc) - the camera - especially wide angle lens - must be even with surface of case, not below it (otherwise the case occludes the edges of the photo) |
| |
| ▲ | eloisant 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Pixel phones also have a camera bump, but it's a band symmetrically placed on the back on the phone. Which is why it's stable. | | |
| ▲ | SirMaster 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Well it certainly looks like the iPhone 17 models will have a camera bump all the way across the width of the device now. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | meuman 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| 4: the fact that Android has unified gestures: back, home and tray. Whenever I used iOS, I felt like every single app had a different way of going back somewhere. On Android, this is not an issue at all. |
| |
| ▲ | 3036e4 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Uh. I used Android for 15 years and I still keep guessing wrong what the back button will do. Feels like 75% of the time it does not lead me back to what I expect and all apps have different ideas what they think it should do. I agree though that not having a back button at all is also not good. | | |
| ▲ | rezonant 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Apps can have questionable Back behaviors but they all have a unified way of invoking Back. Apps on iOS can also have questionable Back behaviors, but the method for invoking Back is not consistent. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | delfinom 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >3: On Android I can use Chrome. Which means web apps can use the File System Access API. This makes web apps first class productivity applications I can use to work on my local files. Impossible on iPhones. Working as intended. Apple wants their 30% cut by all possible means. Web apps would bypass their cut. |
|
| ▲ | gertrunde 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I have to admit, my experience with #1 was quite different. 1. Put pixel on a flat surface.
2. Half an hour later, discover that the the surface wasn't actually flat, as phone the phone crashes to the ground, having been slowly inching its way off the 'flat' surface by virtue of the magically friction free back case of the phone... No joke, by far the slipperyest phone I have ever had, and the one I slapped a case on the fastest, but not fast enough to avoid many dents. |
| |
| ▲ | slipperydippery 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | No! They still do that? Reading this thread had me thinking back to an early Nexus phone I had back in my Android days, maybe around 2012, and here’s this post! I had no idea that wasn’t some odd one-off problem. You could place the phone back-down on a surface a marble wouldn’t roll on, and 20 minutes later it’d magically be on the floor. I’ve never seen anything like it before or since. I can’t believe they’re still doing that (how, though?! And why?!!) | |
| ▲ | 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | ksec 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It is a combination of many things. Number 1 being moving between two system is difficult. The biggest obstacle is WhatsApp. And Meta / Facebook / Zuck is making it hard for people to switch. While it is not yet a thing in US, WhatsApp has 2B user world wide. And their life lives on WhatsApp. Less of an issue if you are on Line, KaKaoTalk and WeChat. Number 2 is choice of phones. Android is basically Google Pixel, Samsung Galaxy and Chinese Brands. I don't even think Pixel has double digit market share and Google Pixel isn't available everywhere. Their distribution channel is still appalling 10 years later. Making it pretty much the choice of Samsung or Chinese Brands. These two obstacles are there before user could even make a choice and compare. At one point I really thought Microsoft could get back into the game of Mobile. But after many years of waiting it doesn't seems that is a direction they want to go to. I think the iPhone 17 coming later next month won' wobble. So that is one problem solved. In the long game it seems we can better count on "Apple can always be trusted to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted.” |
|
| ▲ | flowardnut 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I can download an APK and install it on android. Why can't I use my iphone like I use my macbook? |
| |
| ▲ | xp84 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | An underrated question. The answer of course is twofold: * Paternalism (Apple believes users are too stupid to be trusted to control their devices, and no amount of "I really know what I'm doing" confirmations could change that) * Apple's biggest fear is being disintermediated by Google or Meta, the way WeChat did to phone manufacturers in China. An ability to side-load an app could allow a foothold for a powerful competitor who could wean you off of all their lock-in features in favor of an experience that would tie into a competing ecosystem. | |
| ▲ | dsr_ 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Apple would like your macbook to be more like your iphone: applications only via their store, thank you very much. But it isn't worth the bother; the macbook market is much smaller than the iphone market. |
|
|
| ▲ | vbezhenar 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I prefer iPhone for a miriad of little things. Can't name one particular thing, but it's just constant annoyance, when I have to use Android. I probably could write a list of 100 items, if I'd care to document it all. That said, after Apple started drinking AI juice, I don't want to deal with it anymore. Another major annoyance with iPhones is that they ditched touch ID. Face ID just doesn't work with me at all, it's like 30% of success rate, absolutely terrible. My last phone was iPhone SE, but new models switched to this Face ID, and that's a real deal breaker for me. I even considered buying few iPhone SE phones, while they're still selling at the stores and keep them for later use, but that seems weird and they'll get obsolete with software updates anyway. I switched to Arch on desktop and I'm going to switch to GrapheneOS on my Pixel (native Pixel Android is absolutely terrible experience, GrapheneOS is bad, but everything else is just worse). |
| |
| ▲ | TylerE 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The single thing that solidifys it for me is that every Android device I have ever used has suffered from noticeable micro stuttering. Their current top of the line TV device drops an entire video frame every couple of seconds while watching 60fps content, cause very noticeable jerking. | | |
| ▲ | StopDisinfo910 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Could you remind me which brand still sell a 60Hz screen on their 1000$ phone? | | |
| ▲ | frollogaston 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Don't know don't care. It's like asking a non car enthusiast what kind of differential is on their Toyota. | |
| ▲ | kgabis 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Stable 60Hz is still preferable to stuttery 120Hz. | | |
| ▲ | StopDisinfo910 5 days ago | parent [-] | | It’s good Android has stable 120Hz then. But if you are happy overpaying for a mediocre phone, that’s your right. I did it once. I’m not planning to do it ever again. | | |
| ▲ | TylerE 5 days ago | parent [-] | | No android device I've ever used has a stable ANYTHING performance-wise. | | |
| ▲ | StopDisinfo910 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Happy to know which one you have used then because all the ones I have used in the past from Google, OnePlus and Xiaomi have been rock solid. It’s simple my current iPhone 13 is the second worst phone I have ever owned after the 3S I had a decade before. It’s also the most expensive in a very Apple-like fashion. iOS is a sorry mess. It manages to be both annoyingly limited and awfully buggy. | | |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | TylerE 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Uh, every top model iPhone since the 13 is 120hz. | | |
| ▲ | StopDisinfo910 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The non Pro phone is 60Hz despite being more than 1000€ here. I wish it was a joke but Apple ripoff knows no limit sadly. Meanwhile, most competitors phones half that price have 120Hz. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | dt3ft 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| With an iPhone, when you click on an input field, the on-screen keyboard pops up, and you can type right away. On an android (latest samsung flagship), the keyboard shows up but is frozen for a second before you can type. I feel this and I’m guessing iOS is a lot more closer to the hardware, while android runs on top of Java, so there is more to process. Maybe its just me. |
| |
| ▲ | mrb 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | This must be a glitch particular to Samsung phones. I use flagship Google Pixel phones and have NEVER witnessed such a lag. I tap on an input field with my left thumb, immediately the keyboard shows up, and I immediately smash any letter with my right thumb and it does register it. So, blame Samsung, not Android. I am not too surprised though. Samsung has a reputation for bloating their Android stack with junk. | |
| ▲ | shreddit 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes, I’m used to this too. But lately on my 13 mini, there is a slight delay between the keyboard showing and it registering key presses. I would say it misses the first key press 60% of the time when the keyboard pops up… It’s very annoying | |
| ▲ | prism56 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sorry, can you explain a little more? I'm interested where it doesn't pop up or I'm misunderstanding | | |
| ▲ | dt3ft 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The keyboard pops up, but is not responsive right away. This very thing happened today on my work phone (which has a bunch of MS defender/enterprise policies and apps managed by the company, forced background app updates etc, which could explain this) but I recall it also being a regular thing with all Samsung flagships I've had over the years. It's the feeling of a very slight delay (it could be a matter of as low as 200 ms) for important components which are operating-system controlled, such as the on-screen keyboard. It feels laggy, as if an app or a background process impacts the responsiveness of low level OS features. On iOS, this was never something I had to experience. Slow apps are killed, iOS is brutal in this regard, but it protects the core OS-level components such as the keyboard. Try it out, load a few apps and try switching between them, where one of them had the keyboard uplled up. This is something regular users will likely never feel, but if you've been around since amiga 500, you'll definitelly feel it. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nyarlathotep_ 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Is this a "left brain vs right brain" type of thing? Do most HNers prefer Androids? I can also just plug my Pixel into my Linux machine (I think I needed some other program to do this on Mac, bit it's still easy enough; can't comment on windows) and drag and drop photos, videos, ebooks whatever onto the device. This is huge for me as I work at a location with no BYOD WiFi and poor (very low bandwidth) connection speeds so I often download YT videos for offline listening later. Also worth mentioning VLC is really good on Android and merely OK on iOS. Also very important when you're low on storage from photos, you can unload them with no hassle. I can't do the same with my iPhone; even when I can mount it successfully, its always an arcane directory structure in DCIM sorted by date or something. This is HUGE for me. I cannot understate how much utility I get from this alone. |
|
| ▲ | dwaite 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| 1. If the phone is bare. If you have a case (or a magnetic wallet like mine) it is stable. Rumors are they are moving to a camera bar in the next release. 2. There is a filter 'not in an album' which would do what you want. The library view is the equivalent of "All Mail" in Gmail. In newer versions, this is a distinct view - they are moving albums, automatically generated collections and search to be a primary interface. 3. Both WebKit and Mozilla have said they consider the local access variant of that API to be harmful, since they do not have an adequately prominent way to surface and manage that you've given a web application permanent access to sensitive directories and files, potentially in the background via service workers. Both do support the origin private filesystem variant. Are there productivity apps direct filesystem access would be useful for other than IDEs? |
| |
| ▲ | rezonant 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > Rumors are they are moving to a camera bar in the next release. If the renders out there are correct, it seems the camera modules will still stick out beyond the camera bar for some reason, so I'm not sure it won't wobble-- though it does look like the issue will be reduced |
|
|
| ▲ | 6thbit 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This comment is flamewar bait that doesn't even acknowledge the post. Not every phone related post needs to become one. |
| |
| ▲ | thegrim33 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Gotta love it, open up the comment section about a new Pixel 10 phone, and have to scroll through a massive comment chain of what, 200? 300? comments that aren't related to or addressing the article in any way. |
|
|
| ▲ | himeexcelanta 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I used Android for many years. I got to the point where I didn’t care about or want to customize my phone anymore. I was tired of my Android phone feeling like it was falling apart after a year. I have enough things to think about, troubleshoot, and tinker with…I don’t need my phone to add to that list. |
| |
| ▲ | rchaud 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Which phone brand did you use where it was falling apart after a year? The rest of your comment sounds like you're saying you preferred the iPhone because it takes the option of customizability away from you entirely, instead of simply sticking to the level of customization on Android that worked for you. | | |
| ▲ | himeexcelanta 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Samsung Galaxy S3, HTC EVO 4g, Motorola Droid. I used to do all kinds of things…tether to my laptop without it being supported in my data plan, torrent, etc. I also got tired of the platform skins depending on the manufacturer. If I’m not going to utilize the customization of Android, then I might as well go with the more consistent and refined experience out of the box. Also iMessage! Hate to say it but my social group is primarily iOS so the experience is superior. | | |
| ▲ | rchaud 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Might as well disqualify the iPhone for not having an Instagram app or a file manager if your frame of reference is 2010. | |
| ▲ | hamdingers 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Samsung Galaxy S3, HTC EVO 4g, Motorola Droid. Sharing your opinions without first prefacing they're 12-17 years out of date is disingenuous |
| |
| ▲ | mrheosuper 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | for my case, my S21U's back literally fall apart, not the battery issue, the glue just simply gave up |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Macha 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > When I put a Pixel on a table, it sits there stable My experience with the Pixel 7 Pro is due to the very pronounced camera bump and the rounded edges, the phone would slide off tables with problematic frequency, to the point that mine just lives in its bike mount case full time now. |
| |
|
| ▲ | crinkly 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I have an iPhone 15 Pro. I am a semi regular Pixel user as well. I prefer the iPhone by a mile. 1. Mine sits flat too. It's in a rugged case. 2. You don't know how to use Photos properly. You create collections from the pool and name them. You can create folders as well. In fact it actually does that automatically now. 3. There's literally a files app and filesystem abstraction on iOS. I use it for moving stuff around all the time. Add one gain: 1. All my photos are in real files in Photos.app on my desktop within seconds of me taking them. I do not have my files held ransom behind a web interface. Edits and folders are transparently replicated between both devices. When I back up my mac I have a copy of everything. And a total loss: Post processing on both devices for images is terrible so I use a dedicated camera. |
|
| ▲ | x0x0 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A counterpoint: google intentionally broke the ability to backup photos in Google Photos. Yes, takeout sort of exists, but it doesn't work. If you sort pictures into albums, you get duplicates of each photo for every album. So one copy in the automatic year album; one copy for each album you have put a photo into. My 80gb of photos triples in size, and oh, sometimes downloads fail on the zips they put them into. And since I use a mac, who has 600gb of free disk to download and extract the zips for my dedup script to run. Additionally, they intentionally broke their api (well, just disabled it... but only for most users; it seems to still be available for Microsoft) to do incremental backup. tada! It's the most Apple thing. |
| |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I like Apple photos in this regard on the mac. If you have the storage, you can just set it to download full copies automatically, now all my photos are stored locally on my mac almost as soon as I take the photo on my phone. All google needs to do is make a desktop app and allow automatic download. | |
| ▲ | rossjudson 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | What do you think Photos should do instead? | | |
| ▲ | x0x0 4 days ago | parent [-] | | 1 - Not deprecate the api that allowed people to run incremental backups. They took positive action to intentionally break this. If they feel the need to break the api for ginned-up security excuses, provide a working solution for incremental backup. 2 - Fix takeout not to be entirely broken and hostile to users on 2 axes: usability and reliability. Usability: emit photos once only with a separate json specifying group memberships. Like, you know, competent engineers. Because that's how they store it internally. 2a - Either (i) fix whatever brokenness in their system regularly causes zip downloads to fail; or (ii) figure out or build a reliable alternate solution. Forcing users to wait hours to a day or two to access zips that they can't download is nothing more than a symptom of total disdain for their users while checking a compliance checkbox. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | stgr_codes a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| can you elaborate a bit on this please? > "When I sit in a bus or in a cafe, I go through it and sort the new photos into folders." Are you using the native application called "Files"? I tried to add photos to album via the GooglePhotos application but it will not create a new folder, right? also this:
> "web apps can use the File System Access API. This makes web apps first class productivity applications I can use to work on my local files." Can you share which web apps are you using? Or do you create your own web apps to work on your local files? Thanks in advance, I'm trying to improve the photo management on the pixel because I want to create a simple way to back them up on my NAS but I'm still struggling. |
|
| ▲ | vvvvtt340 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I switched from Android to iOS a few years ago. I used to be deep into Android customization - custom ROMs, custom icon packs, etc. But today, I feel that iOS and Android offer pretty all the features that I could ever want.
My deciding factors when I switched: - iOS UI animations are significantly better - access to iMessage - Apple got around to adding their version of "always on display" - I turn the vast majority of notifications off, so Android's better notification management stopped mattering to me - It felt like Google kept bending Android towards iOS anyway (camera app, moving away from the 3 button navigation) |
| |
| ▲ | cyberax 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > iOS UI animations are significantly better And if you don't like them: tough luck. They're mandatory. | | |
| ▲ | nomel 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Well, technically... Accessibility -> Motion -> Reduce Motion
I also usually turn off transparency, to reduce GPU usage by a negligible amount. | | |
| ▲ | xp84 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I don't like Reduce Motion as it still forces you to wait through the half second of delay while it slowly fades things. I just want all animations deleted to avoid delaying the action itself. You used to be able to do this on a jailbroken phone by setting the global animation duration to be like zero or something, but of course Apple basically won the war on us "users" having any control on the devices we buy from them, or should I say, 'license the privilege of using'? | |
| ▲ | cyberax 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well, try it. It reduces motion, but it does not eliminate all animations. I turned off all animations on my Android phone, and now each time I have to use iOS (for development) it feels like swimming through molasses. |
| |
| ▲ | csmcg 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | you can "Reduce Motion" and "Prefer Cross-Fade Transitions" under accessibility. Not sure if that's what is being referred to though. | |
| ▲ | ThePowerOfFuet 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You can disable them in Accessibility Settings. |
| |
| ▲ | jech 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I feel that iOS and Android offer pretty all the features that I could ever want. Except privacy. |
|
|
| ▲ | cm2012 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think for most people its just whatever you are used to. That said I can't stand iPhone. My wife also switched to Android after being jealous of some features on my phone. |
| |
| ▲ | criddell 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I have an iPhone because at the time I bought it I liked the size (Mini 13) and it's fine. Before that I had some Android phone and it was fine too. I've never understood the strong emotions people have attached to these things. About the only thing I'm looking forward to when I upgrade my phone in a couple of years is getting a better camera. Phones were pretty exciting for a while, but now? It feels like a mature segment and not much is changing anymore. | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I think for most people its just whatever you are used to. Or in the US, it's whatever your family and/or circle of friends use, RCS or not. iMessage lock in is real (along with Facetime, Airdrop, Apple Pay, etc.) |
|
|
| ▲ | AstroBen 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The biggest selling point of an iPhone for me is the easy connection with my Mac and the consistency between them. If it weren't for that I'd strongly consider a pixel |
|
| ▲ | 3036e4 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As a, mostly, happy Android user since the HTC Magic in 2010 or 2009, the one thing I really wish they could fix (but I suspect it would never be possible) is the extremely confusing thing with intents and apps opening as views in other apps. Like when my mail app opens a PDF it looks like I am now in the PDF app and after reading for a while I completely forget that I am actually still in the mail app, and then I go BACK and instead of ending up in my PDF library view as I expected I am suddenly in my mail app. Or when I look at the running apps list there can sometimes look like I have two PDF viewers or two browsers running since some other apps used intents to open views from those apps that now exist in parallel with the real apps. Somehow that manages to surprise and confuse me almost every day. In desktop operating systems, and, I belive, in iOS, there is no need for such thing? Opening a PDF from a mail application usually just opens the PDF viewer as its own application, or it is embedded in some nice way that does not make the entire mail app suddenly look like a PDF viewer app instead. Unfortunately they can probably never fix that because app lifecycle and intents are connected to everything and a good fix for this would probably break everything. |
| |
| ▲ | yellowbkpk 5 days ago | parent [-] | | It's interesting that this feels awkward to you, because when apps don't function this way it feels broken and odd to me. When I tap a PDF attachment in an email I expect the back button to go back to the email I was just viewing, not the list of PDFs on my phone. If I wanted to view all the PDFs on my device, I would start at the PDF viewer and tap into PDFs from there. I wonder what experience made this feel more awkward for you (and conversely, why it feels more natural for me). What a weird/complex world we live in! | | |
| ▲ | 3036e4 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I kind of agree and see what you mean, but what I described happen often that I forget where I came from and have no idea that the PDF I read was opened from some other app. It's part of what I mentioned in another comment, that BACK button can feel random. "Did I open this PDF from within the PDF viewer or from some other app? What app?" Instead of the BACK button having a predictable, known, function, it depends on some hidden state. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | appease7727 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My pixel 8 does not stay where I put it. Without a case, it will slide right off of any slightly tilted surface. It should be illegal to put glass on the back of a phone. |
| |
| ▲ | xp84 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I agree so much. I get why: "Designers" consider plastic to be low-class, metal is radio-opaque, so that leaves glass as the only option even though it has zero functional advantages over plastic (glass is heavier and more fragile). Imagine if it was a panel of plastic, and that you could easily replace it if it got too scuffed up. |
|
|
| ▲ | hintymad 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A mystery about Apple is that some of its software are ridiculously bad. iTunes sync was one of them. Another example is removing iCloud sync used to wipe out the content on the disconnected devices. Screen Time is pretty much unusable. It's really hard to batch update photos in iphone. Heck, it's even hard to batch move app icons on iphone screen. |
|
| ▲ | tgma 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What good is optimizing for the open web when the Pixels lack a sufficiently fast processor for bloated web pages. Haven't tried the 10 yet, but Pixel 9 is sufficiently slow that you can see tearing artifacts when you scroll. This is at least two or three years behind the modern Qualcomm in Samsungs let alone Apple. |
|
| ▲ | baby 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think photos on the pixel are messed up (long-time iphone user who switched for the pixel 9 folding pro), you have all these folders that by default don't get backed up, it took me ages to understand I had to go in settings and manually check all new apps that I install for photos to back them up (and display them in my gallery). It's never clear what's the "offline" vs "online" view of google photos (and why there are other google photos apps). With a bit of fiddling I can finally backup my whatsapp photos, but oh boy why aren't the default saner? For Chrome, it's inconsistancies after inconsistancies. First, I couldn't read PDFs from there, now I can but I can't edit the URL when I edit a PDF, also no built-in app to read PDF, it's crazy. |
|
| ▲ | tristor 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As someone who started on Android but switched to Apple many many many years ago, I still find things like this that are quibbles for me, but in general my preference for Apple is because of security/privacy, battery life management, performance, update longevity, and hardware quality. That said, I think it's worth noting that #1 hardly bothers anyone because most people put their phone in a case, and that can quickly resolve this. #2 isn't a real problem, because you can absolutely sort your photos into folders, they're call albums though, and this is a first-class workflow in the Photos app since they switched from iPhoto to Photos about 6-7 years ago. For #3, I don't want my web browser having file system access via an API and I don't use Chrome. |
|
| ▲ | carlosjobim 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > This makes web apps first class productivity applications I can use to work on my local files. Impossible on iPhones. The thing is that web apps are always a worse experience if you have native apps. Linux and Android (and now also Windows) depend on web apps because they don't have good quality native apps. For Apple devices you can always find a top quality native app to use, so web apps aren't any concern. The only people I have met who want to use apps in their browser on MacOS are Linux refugees who were attracted by the "specs" of Apple devices. It's a bit like buying an electric car and lamenting the lack of a gearbox. You don't need it anymore. |
| |
| ▲ | StopDisinfo910 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > Linux and Android (and now also Windows) depend on web apps because they don't have good quality native apps. I fail to see any iOS without an equivalent native application on Android when the Android application is not actually significantly better. iOS really is a minority os here and it shows. | | |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I had a really hard time finding a good email client for my Android tablet. | | |
| ▲ | prmoustache 4 days ago | parent [-] | | kmail has always worked great for me. I am using mostly web apps. Not because web apps are inherently better or more convenient, but because ublock origin on firefox allow me to disable any third party tracking. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | hajile 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| File System Access API has some serious issues. To quote Mozilla's position on the topic > There's a subset of this API we're quite enthusiastic about (in particular providing a read/write API for files and directories as alternative storage endpoint), but it is wrapped together with aspects for which we do not think meaningful end user consent is possible to obtain (in particular cross-site access to the end user's local file system). Overall we consider this harmful therefore, but Mozilla could be supportive of parts, provided this were segmented better. I think most users would probably be better off without this proposal. |
| |
|
| ▲ | hellisothers 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| 2: you can organize photos into folders but nobody does 3: I actively don’t want this nor would I want anybody I care about to have to deal with this. But props to you for having an argument for Android aside from the usual “I have more control” |
|
| ▲ | jimbokun 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think a lot of developers think like you, but most users of phones don't. I don't think most people care enough to put time into organizing their photos, but would rather the phone or backend AI just find the photo they want by searching for it. I'm not sure if most users even have a strong conception of "file" or really understand what data is physically on their phone vs "the cloud". (The symmetry thing though probably does bother a lot of people regardless of their level of technical expertise.) |
| |
| ▲ | 9dev 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Well I’m a very technical person, and sorting photos into folders seems like a colossal waste of time to me, when I can also just search for a thing on the image, the place or time when or where it was taken, a person or animal on it; I could add it to an album, star it, add tags to it; that should be more than enough sorting facilities, I think. | | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Same. In fact, I don't organize much of anything that's digital, photos or files. I just use search, it's pretty good these days, and with OCR even better. Just give me a big flag structure with robust search and I'm happy. Heck I don't even bother to organize or layout the apps on my home screen. quicker for me to search with spotlight than scroll around and find what I want. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dyauspitr 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| None of those things matter to me. What does matter to me is that to get stuff off my iPhone I have to do a weird sync process and/or use iCloud. Infact, a lot of my issues with the iPhone stem from refusing to use iCloud. Can’t use Apple Pay or FindMy. For now I use Airdrop to move photos from my iPhone to the computer but it’s very error prone and fails 1/5 times and way more often if you try to do it with more than 30 images/videos. Is this situation better in the Pixel? |
|
| ▲ | leokennis 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Regarding the second point, while I gladly agree the current iOS Photos app is a mess, doesn't it make sense to have photos in multiple albums? If I went on holiday to Brazil and made a nice photo of my son there, I'd like that photo to be in both the "Brazil holiday" and "Beautiful photos of my children" albums, not just in one folder. |
|
| ▲ | mikepurvis 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My first smartphone was a cheap Android and then I switched to iPhone about eight years ago and mostly haven't looked back. That said, Apple's behaviour around locking out wearables from key system APIs does have me reconsidering. I found the inconsistent sync and notifications on my Fitbit to be a pretty big source of annoyance and if that continues on the new Pebble I would consider switching back to Android just for that. |
| |
| ▲ | xp84 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I think the EU or the US (one of them) is trying to force Apple to give third parties access to the things Apple Watch has access to, so there might be relief coming for one of those continents (one assumes that the petulant child that is Apple's leadership will, after appealing to the maximum, region-gate any remedy, exactly as they did for third-party app stores in EU). |
|
|
| ▲ | bapak 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > sort them in folders. They had that in iPhotos and dropped it in Photos. I missed it for about a month and then I got over it. I'd never sort my photos now, I can just search them or find them on the map. If you want to sort photos by folder, no one stops you from using other apps. Google Photos itself is available. Very, very few people want to spend time sorting all their photos, it's a fool's errand. |
|
| ▲ | pkulak 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| 2/3 of your complaints seem to be down to Apple's insistence that filesystems are silly and should be hidden from users. Unless it's iCloud, then show the user 2 identical filesystems and scatter everything at random between the two. Really, it's a write-only filesystem. Apps will constantly save things there, but god help you if you ever want to find something. |
|
| ▲ | dwd 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > 1: When I put a Pixel on a table, it sits there stable. That was the first thing I noticed. I assume the extra protuberance is to enable the insane zoom level but it goes full width for stability. I have G85 Motorola - great phone (and primarily a phone/modem/camera) for the price, but it wobbles slightly. Yes, I prefer Android, but have a M4 Air that goes everywhere with me to do actual work. |
|
| ▲ | culi 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > 3: On Android I can use Chrome. Which means web apps can use the File System Access API. This makes web apps first class productivity applications I can use to work on my local files. Impossible on iPhones. Safari has support File System Access API since 2022. Maybe you haven't kept up but Apple has done a 180° on PWAs in the past few years |
|
| ▲ | cheema33 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| For me, it is the ability to tether my laptop to an iPhone to use the data service on my iPhone. This alone made me give up on Windows laptops and Android phones. Sure, you can tether Windows laptops to Android phones. But, it is a slow and cumbersome process. I use this functionality frequently enough that it was worth it to switch platforms over it. |
| |
| ▲ | corndoge 5 days ago | parent [-] | | When I switched off Android >5 years ago, even then, it was as simple as turning on the hotspot and connecting to it. It was no more cumbersome than any other wifi network. This was with a Pixel device and Linux laptop, and I am sure it works on Windows too. | | |
| ▲ | cheema33 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | You have obviously not compared it to how fast a Mac connects to an iphone. There is no need to turn on the hotspot. You can leave that on on the iphone. Just open your MacBook and it quickly connects to your iphone if it does not find a standard wifi. I am very familiar with the Android hotspot feature. I used it for years. It works OK. But, it is not as fast as the Mac/iphone combo. Not even close. I am speaking from extensive experience. | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's the same now. Turn on hotspot->Connect to it on the PC. After that one step it's in your saved networks and you're good to go. The only difference is Apple will do this automatically for you. If you open up your mac, and don't have network, you get a little pop up that says "use iPHone's connection?" and will turn on hotspot and connect automatically. Nice, but hardly any different or time saving really. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dxxmxnd 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I use an iPhone because Apple is more focused on privacy, and I don’t really need that many features on my phone. |
| |
| ▲ | makeitdouble 5 days ago | parent [-] | | > Apple is more focused on privacy A more precise way to put it: Apple is focused on customer control, and will fight whoever tries to touch what they see as Apple's exclusive customers. This has privacy benefits against tracking agents, reduces functionalities against third party services (Amazon, Spotify, Google, third party payment etc.), and forbids whole use cases (e.g. non Apple backup service). As a customer one can be happy with the privacy windfall, but we've seen again and again that it's not Apple's focus per se. |
|
|
| ▲ | _def 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Of course it's a matter of taste, personality, culture, etc. That's why flame wars about anything don't make sense, whether it is about Operating Systems, browsers, gaming platforms, text editors, phones, cars, coffee, or whatever else you can come up with to arbitrarily argue about. |
|
| ▲ | tomaskafka 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’d love to use the android phone, as they seem to have much better and actually useful AI integration, but they are not phones but “advertising company tracking devices with tacked-on end user functionality”. Similarly, Chrome is not User Agent, it’s Corporation Agent. |
|
| ▲ | SomeHacker44 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I like that I can run whatever software I want on it. I do not like that it is overly locked down without rooting. But still way more open than iOS, regardless of what the mobile phone lawsuits from Epic decided. |
|
| ▲ | littlecranky67 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| To your 3: On iOS Safari, I can use extensions. That includes adblockers (uBlock origin lite) and others like Vinegar (allows youtube videos to play in background while display is off). No ads boosts productivity more than the file API - what would I need that for? |
|
| ▲ | infecto 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I prefer an iPhone but only because it has generally given me the best experience where I am not having to fiddle with anything. Maybe android has changed but I made the swap, maybe a decade ago, because android had very weak boundaries on apps running in the background. |
|
| ▲ | Melatonic 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As someone who used Android for years and only recently switched to iOS the lack of file system access is really the only dealbreaker. It's damn annoying. The hardware is reliable and solid but why do we get such a crippled operating system ? |
|
| ▲ | seviu 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The older I get the more I value screen real state. And that foldable phone is really calling me. Aside from that the fact that I can sideload apps. Run a VM. Work. All this with 16Gb of Ram. And the list goes on and on. Honestly having an iPhone these days feels more a punishment than something else. |
|
| ▲ | myaccountonhn 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I knew apple wasn't for me when I tried to sync and backup my stuff on something that wasn't iCloud. Its just plain unusable if you don't want to be fully entrenched in their cloud services. |
| |
| ▲ | jama211 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I’m an iphone user and I’ve always used Dropbox and google photos as my general backup mediums. | | |
| ▲ | ThatPlayer 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Isn't that photo specific backup rather than general backups? Last I tried, Dropbox on iPhone cannot backup any files owned by other apps automatically. You'd have to export it manually to Dropbox. Edit; It looks like this is possible on iOS for apps to access other app's file sandboxes with a somewhat recent iOS update. MobiusSync (Syncthing client for iOS) has beta support for it. But I see no mention of Dropbox adding support for anything similar | | |
| ▲ | jama211 5 days ago | parent [-] | | It’s true that I have some app data being stored in iCloud, but it is VERY within the free tier space limit. But depends on the app, many apps support Dropbox themselves and I store the data in Dropbox for those. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | jama211 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| FYI rumour has it the iPhones about to be released will have the same sort of full width camera module so the “wobble” won’t be an issue. Not that it ever was for me before, I have a case on it. |
|
| ▲ | laleck 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| For #2, on iOS, you can move photos to shared albums and then safely delete them from library while retaining them in shared album. Shared albums use iCloud space, so it’s not ideal. |
|
| ▲ | muizelaar 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What web apps do you use that use the File System Access API? |
|
| ▲ | siva7 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Nope, i wish Apple would do this the way Android does. Most people here prefer Apple, not because of the crap iOS but because of the hardware. |
|
| ▲ | lawlessone 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Decision 3 is a no brainer. Apple want you to use the apps they've curated , not web apps, not apps or games from 3rd party stores etc. |
|
| ▲ | epolanski 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think most HNers prefer iPhones because they seemlessly integrate with the rest of the ecosystem. |
| |
| ▲ | rezonant 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Assuming you mean the rest of the Apple ecosystem this is kind of like saying most countries speak French because all the road signs are in French. Someone who doesn't have an iPhone doesn't necessarily have twenty other Apple devices around. |
|
|
| ▲ | afavour 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’m a former Android user (bought a Nexus One on release!) that switched to iOS many years ago and I don’t miss Android as much as I thought I might. To me the biggest thing to reflect on is how depressing it is that we must all fit ourselves into one of two boxes. My kingdom for a flourishing mobile OS ecosystem where we can all find the exact combination that scratches our itches. |
| |
| ▲ | xandrius 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Well, we have 3 main boxes and 1 got mostly rejected (windows). One is a worse version of OSX and the other is basically what would have happened if Linux was initially created by a huge corp. My dream is for a top-notch Ubuntu for mobile. I'm still waiting for Desktop to catch up, so won't hold my breath. |
|
|
| ▲ | 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | OtherShrezzing 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I do t think I’ve ever met anyone who doesn’t use a phone case, all of which fix #1 |
| |
| ▲ | coldpie 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I've never used a phone case. I don't understand why they make these things so small and then everyone just slaps on an extra couple mm. What's the point? If we're making them bigger anyway, at least use that space for more battery. Anyway, the wobble is real, and sucks. | | |
| ▲ | ThatPlayer 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Similar, but I did use a phone case once because it came with the phone and included a pretty big feature. The LG V60 with dual screen case. It made the phone entirely way too thick. But it was still thinner than the 2 phones I was carrying around previously. | |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I run caseless too and would be willing to sacrifice a few mm for better durability and no bump. Plastic is fine too. Bring back designs like the iPhone 3GS which were curved to fit your palm and if dropped would just bounce and tank it! | |
| ▲ | dismalaf 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Phones are too slippery these days. Everyone makes them of smooth glass or metal. | | |
| ▲ | coldpie 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Remember soft touch plastics? Grippy and didn't waste all the space of a case? Then some dingleberry marketer decided slippery metals and glass were "premium" and braindead phone reviewers happily parroted that crap and now everyone buys several mm thick cases made of soft touch plastics to cover up the "premium" materials they bought. Sigh. | | |
| ▲ | dismalaf 5 days ago | parent [-] | | I do. My HTC Amaze had nice soft-touch plastic on top of an aluminum back, was slim (for the era) and grippy. Also had a Galaxy Note (forget which one) that had a leathery soft touch back, was very nice. The physical design of phones definitely peaked long ago... |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | signal11 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > When I sit in a bus or in a cafe, I go through it and sort the new photos into folders. This is exactly the sort of thing a lot of smartphone users (including Android users) won’t do. The point of post-PC devices is to actually be post-PC. For many, futzing around with files isn’t the answer. For instance I gave up doing this to my email years ago. It was very liberating. If I want something, I search. I can save searches I frequently perform. iOS’s Photos app isn’t perfect but it allows me to find stuff just fine. I can search for places (“Seattle”), for things (“bicycle”) or even combinations (“plants Vancouver”). It’s pretty neat. And you can actually add stuff to folders (‘albums’) if you really want to. > local files iOS has them too. There are apps which allow you to access and manage local files — including the built in file manager. It’s not as laissez-faire as Android, though. Even the file manager has come a long way, and it’s improving further in iOS 26. tl;dr — iOS isn’t for everyone, but it’s not like it’s not well-designed with a certain audience in mind. |
|
| ▲ | paulddraper 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I recently switched to an iPhone. I legitimately struggle to find anything better. (Battery, perhaps?) |
|
| ▲ | npteljes 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I like Pixels because I can put Graphene on them. |
|
| ▲ | monkeyelite 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I never want to sort photos in folders. |
|
| ▲ | IT4MD 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They also screw up the hardware. When I use a fingerprint scanner on other phones, it works. When I used it on my last Pixel (6 or 7, I cant remember) it failed over half the time. How does one screw up biometrics this badly? Lack of care/QA on a $1k device. GL with your Pixel. Note: I'm not an Apple fan boi. I swap every couple of years so I maintain skills in both OSes. |
| |
| ▲ | OneDeuxTriSeiGo 5 days ago | parent [-] | | If it was the Pixel 6, I can attest that the 6 (at least the 6 Pro XL) had issues with the fingerprint scanner. I had no issues with my 5 series (when the fingerprint scanner was on the back) but the 6 series always gave me trouble. I'd wager a guess the reason why was because it was the first generation with an under-display fingerprint scanner and they hadn't yet worked out the quirks. I've since upgraded to a 9 series and it works flawlessly so I can assume they've figured it out some time since then. | | |
| ▲ | IT4MD 5 days ago | parent [-] | | How much of your money for the pixel 6 garbage did they refund? Same here. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | bongodongobob 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| 1. You don't have a case??? |
|
| ▲ | coldtea 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >1: When I put a Pixel on a table, it sits there stable. Because the backside is symmetrical. When I put an iPhone on a table, it wobbles So? Big deal... |
|
| ▲ | Gud 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Frankly, iOS could be a giant turd of an OS, at least it's somewhat privacy respecting(for the time being), I would still prefer it. As long as it's that, it's light years ahead of Android. Which is a vehicle for Google to spy on you so they can sell your data. |
| |
| ▲ | lpcvoid 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Nobody privacy respecting uses stock Pixel android. Check out GrapheneOS. |
|
|
| ▲ | gralab 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| These are all extremely minor issues. 2 and 3 are not even relevant to 99% of normal users. Very few people want to spend time manually organizing photos like that, and albums do essentially the same thing. The wobbling thing is a non-issue. It doesn't even wobble unless you're pounding down on the phone on a table. |