> they aren't being used by 80% of the world's population.

I said "iPhone is more appealing to 80%+ of world's population". I didn't say everyone who wants it can afford it.

It's pure speculation, of course, but given its current market share (27% of all devices sold) and its price point, I don't think it's too far fetched to say that its market share would be much higher if price wasn't an issue for people. This is somewhat hinted by the fact that it has a 78% market share in the $1,000+ segment [1], and most iPhone models are over $1K.

Also it still ships more phones than any other single vendor (unless you lump all Android phones into one bucket). In terms of revenue, it's by far the leader with 43% [2].

[1] https://www.netguru.com/blog/iphone-vs-android-users-differe...

[2] https://www.counterpointresearch.com/en/insights/global-smar...

Overconfident in your numbers you are, just because they suit your narrative. Zero actual backing for those you provide. Not reflecting reality I can see they are.

>I said "iPhone is more appealing to 80%+ of world's population".

The reality distortion field is alive and well.