|
| ▲ | frollogaston 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Don't know don't care. It's like asking a non car enthusiast what kind of differential is on their Toyota. |
|
| ▲ | kgabis 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Stable 60Hz is still preferable to stuttery 120Hz. |
| |
| ▲ | StopDisinfo910 5 days ago | parent [-] | | It’s good Android has stable 120Hz then. But if you are happy overpaying for a mediocre phone, that’s your right. I did it once. I’m not planning to do it ever again. | | |
| ▲ | TylerE 5 days ago | parent [-] | | No android device I've ever used has a stable ANYTHING performance-wise. | | |
| ▲ | StopDisinfo910 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Happy to know which one you have used then because all the ones I have used in the past from Google, OnePlus and Xiaomi have been rock solid. It’s simple my current iPhone 13 is the second worst phone I have ever owned after the 3S I had a decade before. It’s also the most expensive in a very Apple-like fashion. iOS is a sorry mess. It manages to be both annoyingly limited and awfully buggy. | | |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | TylerE 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Uh, every top model iPhone since the 13 is 120hz. |
| |
| ▲ | StopDisinfo910 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The non Pro phone is 60Hz despite being more than 1000€ here. I wish it was a joke but Apple ripoff knows no limit sadly. Meanwhile, most competitors phones half that price have 120Hz. | | |
|
