Remix.run Logo
corobo 8 months ago

I've just loaded my Facebook home page. 6 'pages' (I know it's infinite scroll but you know what I mean) before I saw an actual friend's post, and it was from 2 weeks ago.

Jeez Zucky, I wonder why social is dying. Is it because there's no bloody social between the ads and random algorithm shite anymore?

E: haha, the rest of the comments say likewise. Redundant comment but +1 anecdata.

Also for what it's worth I've checked a few profiles and yeah friends are still posting, I'm just not seeing it. I guess I scrolled past some post about something too quickly and now Facebook thinks I don't care? Maybe the algorithm is just broken lol.

Eric_WVGG 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

I was a very early Instagram user and would even defend it over the years as "influencers" became a thing. “I don’t see it as a problem… if you don’t like those people then don’t follow them.”

Nothing about my tastes have changed over the years, but I now find Instagram to be painful to look at. If social media is over, it’s because Meta made the conscious decision to kill it.

jonathanlb 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

I would argue that social media’s positive-feedback engine contributed to its own demise. Anec-data:

After being terminally online on Instagram, I decided to took a two-week break because I was noticed I was mindlessly scrolling through content that I enjoyed. After the two weeks, it was striking to note that almost all videos followed a pattern- a jarring hook in the first two seconds, a provocative question, rapid-fire cuts and a soundtrack. Most videos have to follow this proven formula, but in doing so, they'll be like all the other videos and will then have to take the next step to engage users, so videos become more aggressive and formulaic, which for me, gets in the way of the content.

This is completely omitting the fact that quickly scrolling past accounts you follow will trigger Instagram to suggest clips that are more provocative in an effort to capture one's attention. Even if you're intentional about what you consume, the app is adversarial to your own intentions.

kevin_thibedeau 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

It's MBAs on the eternal quest to juice profits. If a social site ran itself lean like Craigslist they could win the entire prize without the need to manipulate content for the benefit of advertisers.

selfhoster 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's an eloquently stated view. I'm not on FB or Instagram, but everything you said somehow resonated with me as a YT user.

smcin 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Sure, but don't mislabel that "positive-feedback engine". Engagement, attention loop, reinforcement, clicks, views, comments, likes, follows, longer average visit time, distraction engine, compulsive behavior, higher advertiser revenue, whatever, but it isn't positive and it isn't really feedback.

If you had a friend who in the middle of interactions habitually pulled out a bag of cocaine and snorted some (or gambled), you wouldn't say they were giving positive feedback to the dealer (/casino). You'd say they were annoying and unable to function.

What happens on Instagram if you vote dislike/ignore attention-bait clips and try to find longer-form (>10 minute) content, and use searches rather than feed?

jonathanlb 8 months ago | parent [-]

> don't mislabel that "positive-feedback engine".

But it is a positive feedback loop in a technical sense. Think of a microphone providing sound to an amplifier, and that amplifier in turn providing amplified sound into the original microphone. It's self-reinforcing.

> What happens on Instagram if you vote dislike/ignore attention-bait clips and try to find longer-form (>10 minute) content, and use searches rather than feed?

The thing is, I don't want to be on Instagram. It's basically TV for me, and I'd rather not engage with content that way because it's passive and messes up my attention span. I already stare at a screen for eight hours a day for work, and I'd rather not have to spend any more time on screens than I have to.

smcin 8 months ago | parent [-]

It's in general very negative; it's only "positive feedback" in the ultra-narrow technical sense wrt reinforcing the compulsive behavior, which is negative to the user, negative to the user's wellbeing, friends, family, negative to society.

My analogy to reinforcing any other compulsive damaging behavior stands. It's not "positive feedback" to the dealer or casino.

Let us not let our words do the thinking for us, as Orwell cautioned.

mrandish 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Meta made the conscious decision to kill it.

No, it wasn't conscious, they just incrementally and iteratively optimized the site to maximize page views and ad revenue. Turns out that ends up eventually killing it - without ever having the intention of doing so. But you can rest assured that every decision on that long, slippery slope optimized some metric toward a local maxima.

It's been 8 years since my last post on Facebook and I visit less than 10 mins a year (only because I have one friend who uses FB messenger to communicate with me when he's traveling).

bravoetch 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

When a fb exec gave a talk at our then small startup about their 'north star' being monthly active users, I thought maybe they had just given up on serving their customers, that was in 2014. He detailed how they measured 'active' etc.

Our CEO immediately adopted a north star of 'revenue', again just shoving end-users into a pile for exploitation. Companies are not making products to solve an end-user issue, or even add value. The VC is the customer, and if your fb feed and IG is toxic, it's because that's working well for the investors.

ethbr1 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

It begs the question of how much time Zuckerberg and Meta's leadership spend actually using their own products, nowadays.

nrclark 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

The first rule of dealing is "don't get high on your own supply".

ethbr1 8 months ago | parent [-]

At some point, Facebook (and Amazon and Google before it) were products that delivered what their users wanted.

The essence of enshittification is product leadership losing the plot on their users' desires and piloting everything off the cliff by solely following growth metrics.

mseepgood 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Why would they? They're not dumb.

conductr 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I use SM very seldom. But IG was my fav for a long time. I only had about 50 friends, all real people that I knew, they didn't post daily, it was roughly 1:1 ratio of follower:following, so - I could open it up about once a month, scroll through a dozen or so images and see the "you're all caught up" notice and bounce. At some point, I remember it saying my account wasn't showing me Ads because I had low follower count / low engagement - which I thought was great and it went on that way for a few years. Then at some point it became clear it changed. At first, it wasn't Ads, just posts from random people inserted into my feed. I never engage with anything overtly - no likes, comments, etc. But, I think I do spend more time on things that I "like" and do swipe through if there are multiple images if I find something interesting. So that was all the training that it needed. Soon after that, all I see on IG are half naked women in form fitting attire and construction content. Turns out I'm a hetero male that has a hobby of building stuff/home improvement, but I already knew that. I stopped using it all together.

The funny part is because of my construction hobby & interest in building science; I started seeing Ads in Spanish which I don't speak. I get this on YT too as that's where most my "how to build a ...." stuff ends up.

asdfman123 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I feel it's all a side effect of chasing numbers. They show us a bunch of junk, which is addictive for a while but eventually we quit it for good. If they had decided "ok, Facebook is just going to be the place for friend updates" many of us would have stayed.

guappa 8 months ago | parent [-]

It all started because they needed to fill it up after the content shared by your friends is finished.

macNchz 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

Well yeah, scrolling through and liking a picture of your friend's vacation and commenting "Adorable!" on a video of your cousin's toddler only gives you, say, 10 minutes to see ads, whereas getting fed an endless stream of progressively more intense and precisely-tuned content to tickle at your inner psyche (be it most susceptible to anger, lust, envy, greed etc) means you might spend hours on there scrolling past ads.

asdfman123 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Well, in theory they could have just stuck to being a humble social media site, even if the traffic were to plateau or drop slightly. Something like what Craigslist did, but slightly more modern.

But of course if they'd done that Meta wouldn't be worth a hundred gazillion dollars now.

daniel_reetz 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Meta made the decision to take control of what users see via the feed, and to show them mostly content which is NOT from friends. Content that "performs well".

The testimony is disingenuous, but true. People see less of their friends because they are show less of their friends. Friends post less becuase no one sees it.

guappa 8 months ago | parent [-]

Yeah with my friends we moved to a matrix group.

grokgrok 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's not so much dead as resembling a mangy, depressed tiger stuck in a cage at a discount-tier circus

dazh 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm no Meta apologist, but I don't know if we can blame them on this one. Unfortunately in the digital age, everything reverts to the mean so quickly. It probably turns out that the most effective way to capture user attention is to give them an algo feed of addictive slop.

Unfortunately capturing user attention is also the best way to sell advertising, so it makes sense that all their products converged on algo feeds.

manbitesdog 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Facebook is now a birthday-reminder and old-connection-keeper tool loaded with empty content to feel less sad. Instagram and TikTok are also trending towards content consumption. Messaging and group chats are the only real social media now

wil421 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

Facebook groups are like the new Internet forums. There’s tons of stuff that’s moved to Facebook groups like Fishing and Car forums. For a lot of content Facebook groups are much better than forums.

Marketplace seems to be the new Craigslist and much better IMHO.

Posting is probably dead or dying. I haven’t done it in a decade or so.

ultrarunner 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

They could be huge in this, but sadly they'll continue to ruin it because (IMHO) they are rotten at the core. I can't tell you how many times I've seen a question posted on a relevant topic, switched tabs to consult the manual to verify my memory, and then gone back only to see Facebook do its ADHD reload and bury the question.

Once people get sufficiently frustrated and the ad revenue declines below the cost of running the servers, we will immediately lose all of the information shared there. None of it will be archived like the old forums. It's a genuinely sad situation.

bschwindHN 8 months ago | parent [-]

> and then gone back only to see Facebook do its ADHD reload and bury the question

Does anyone know why facebook does this? It's the most infuriating thing, like it's assuming the poor user doesn't know how to "refresh" a page so it does it for them, because clearly they got stuck on an old crusty piece of content.

zoky 8 months ago | parent [-]

You know exactly why they do it. To generate “engagement”.

HeadsUpHigh 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>For a lot of content Facebook groups are much better than forums

Facebook groups are very disjointed and the algo does a bad job and keeping the good bits floating to the top.

dboreham 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In my experience the Facebook groups always turn to crap, especially if it's a group that attracts more than about 500 users. Abusive posts, scam posts, fake groups with the same name created by bots. I've reverted to old school forums for all my special interests. Marketplace is still the best classifieds product though.

freehorse 8 months ago | parent [-]

It depends on the mods and the specific communities the groups are about. I have seen what you describe in some, but not at all in others.

spacechild1 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> For a lot of content Facebook groups are much better than forums.

How so? I find FB groups strictly worse than old-school forums.

Lammy 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't even enjoy FB Groups any more because of the way they filter comments to “most relevant” so I have to click twice to change it to “all comments” on every single post, over and over and over. Tiresome.

It's embarrassingly dumb sometimes, too, like a post can show “3 comments”, I click it, and the “most relevant” will just be two of them with a bunch of empty space left over in the UI. Just show me all of the fucking comments omfg!!!

8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
shanecleveland 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Only reason I caved and joined Facebook a few years ago was to get access to a group dedicated to Boston Whaler boats. There were two previously-thriving forums that were slowly dying. The forums were great. The Facebook group was not better, just alive.

freehorse 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Also events, it's probably the platform affecting discoverability of events the most.

The ways fb is (still) the most useful to users are the ones meta cares the least about.

throw042425 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's interesting. In what sense would you say FB groups are much better than forums?

But yeah I agree, groups and marketplace are the only things keeping FB alive.

iamacyborg 8 months ago | parent [-]

They’re better in the sense that people actually use them

shanecleveland 8 months ago | parent [-]

Probably true with most successful things. Marketplace is just a low barrier to entry for people already using Facebook. I find it generally terrible, but that's where people are selling.

naijaboiler 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

would rather use reddit for foruming than facebook groups

freehorse 8 months ago | parent [-]

I would rather have ol' good forums. I would rather have years long posts in the frontpage and the ability to bump a long burried post when new info is up, and not missing the opportunity to engage with a topic just because 1-2 days passed without me logging in and thus the post, being more than 1-2 days old, is not in the frontpage anymore.

corobo 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Ooh speaking of birthday reminders - if Facebook is browsing this thread looking for things to fix: bring back the birthday iCal feed!

You literally had notifications via my calendar bringing me back to your site every few days/weeks to say happy birthday and maybe have a bit of a browse. Now the reminders are in my todo list and I say happy birthday via text or call instead. Path of least pain in the backside.

Absolutely bizarre they ditched the birthdays and events iCal feeds.

barbazoo 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

Funny that you think they’d prioritize something that’d be useful, good for you.

pixl97 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

Boss: "you're only allowed to work on things that serve more ad views"

reverendsteveii 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Remember when they told us that capitalism would cause people to trip over themselves to give us what we want and need because that would naturally be where most of the profit could be had? Why do you think it didn't do that in this case? The answer of course is that facebook does serve it's customers. It serves the people who can afford to buy ads, and what it serves them is you.

asimpletune 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

Honestly, everything would be much better if either a.) people just paid for stuff or b.) governments decided ad-tech in its present form should not be a thing, and regulated the retention of personal data as a liability, to make targeted advertising less-personalized/unprofitable.

As a system for discovering price, free markets work really well. The downsides comes from politicians not understanding/caring the limitations of free markets and what kinds of problems they're simply not intended to solve. These are the economic factors beyond price. More broadly, they're our values.

If we outsource the need for philosophy/wisdom to the free markets then there is no reason why the market will not demand child labor, 7 day work weeks, single use everything, and privatized security forces. We failed to take action earlier, and the same kind of stuff has already happened to the environment. Not to mention that gambling and security fraud are making a comeback.

reverendsteveii 8 months ago | parent [-]

I'm 100% with you on the idea that it's time to start paying for services on the internet instead of the ad-funded model we have today. The problem is that the people who decide when and how to monetize things seem to be moving toward a model where they charge you for the service, sell your data and feed you ads.

bdangubic 8 months ago | parent [-]

100% this… everything you pay for is already selling your data and will eventually feed you ads.

asimpletune 8 months ago | parent [-]

If lawmakers regulated data retention to make targeted advertising unprofitable, then businesses would have no choice but to compete for customer’s money directly by providing value.

anonymars 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The missing ingredient is usually "competition"

Same thing with the "private sector is always better" religion - if there's no meaningful competition, you end up no choice coupled with a profit motive, vs. no choice but I can at least nominally vote and be represented

ISPs are usually a good example in the US. My old apartment had one provider, and wouldn't you know it, at my new apartment with multiple providers, I got five times the bandwidth for half the price.

See also: enshittification

reverendsteveii 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

In light of competition being the missing ingredient, the question becomes how does one maintain ongoing competition in a system where the bigger of two competitors tends to win and the winner of two competitors tends to get bigger? That's exactly what happened here: Facebook was bigger than WhatsApp, and FB+WA is bigger than Insta, so FB+WA+Insta is a lot bigger than anyone else.

Back in the day when Microsoft was the one in the DoJ's sights someone compared it to a dog race. Dogs don't have jockeys, so you have to figure out some other way to induce them to run. The way most tracks (probably all, idk much about dog racing but it's a useful metaphor here) do that is by having a mechanical bunny that runs out ahead of the dogs and activates their prey drive. The bunny has to be ahead of the dogs, but not so far ahead that they don't think they can catch it and give up. That means that every once in a while a dog will get the timing just right, go extra hard, and actually catch the bunny. At that point, the race is over for everyone until someone steps in to shake the dog loose from the bunny and give everyone a reason to run again. Our system is like that: we have to encourage everyone to do everything they can to catch the bunny but also ensure that they never actually do. Bill Gates was the first person in my memory to catch the bunny, and needed to be shaken loose. Now it's Zuckerberg, and probably Google, that need to be pried off of their respective bunnies so that everyone else has something to chase.

safety1st 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

For a start, and it might even be enough, you strictly enforce anti-trust laws which are already on the books that prevent sufficiently large firms from acquiring their competitors and doing exclusivity deals. These laws have largely been ignored for decades and I don't know what to call that other than blatant corruption of our government, but it's slowly starting to change, in a bipartisan way.

Microsoft escaped the worst of what the government wanted to do to them for their anti-trust violations. It may not go so well for Google as they hold the distinction of being the only company in US history to have been tried and found guilty in three separate cases of possessing three illegal monopolies all at the same time. Two example measures under discussion in the court at the moment are forbidding any renewal of their browser default deal with Apple, and forcing them to sell off Chrome. We will see soon enough what comes next.

Whoppertime 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Foreign competitors is how you get competition usually. The big 3 auto companies can lobby Congress and discourage competition. When American Cars started installing tailfins (purely cosmetics) instead of competing on fuel performance, maintenance or price, they were opening the door for the Japanese auto industry to eventually take over, with the crisis of the oil shock being the instigating factor for people changing their consumption habits

thesuitonym 8 months ago | parent [-]

That only works as long as the companies don't pay Congress to keep foreign competitors out of the market. To continue the automobile example, consider why the market for light trucks in the US is almost exclusively American brands.

jerf 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The missing ingredient here is that there is a gulf between what people really need, and what they do. Capitalism/market forces/etc. optimize on that "what people really do" and not what they need, and especially not what they say they want. See also, for instance, the layout of your grocery store.

The good news is that capitalism is in fact really good at serving exactly the preferences you reveal through your actions, and there are ways in which that is good. The bad news is that the farther away we get from our "native environment" the farther our needs and revealed preferences are diverging. I can think of no equivalent threat in our ancestral environment to "scrolling away your day on Facebook". Sloth and laziness aren't new, but that enticement to it is very new.

The discipline to sit, think with your brain, and realize with your system 2 brain [1] that you need to harness and control your system 1 urges is moving from "a recipe to live a good life" (e.g., wisdom literature, Marcus Aurelius, Proverbs, Confucious, many many other examples dating back thousands of years), but one a lot of people lived reasonably happily without, to a necessity to thrive in the modern environment. Unfortunately, humans have never, ever been collectively good at that.

And the level of brutality that system 2 must use on system 1 is going up, too. Resisting an indulgent dinner is one thing; carrying around the entire internet in your pocket and resisting darned near every vice simultaneously, continuously, is quite another. In my lifetime this problem has sharpened profoundly from minor issue to major problem everyone faces every hour.

For a much older example, see "drugs". Which is also a new example as the frontier expands there, too.

I have no idea what a solution to this at scale looks like. But I am quite optimistic we will ultimately find one, because we will have to. The systems can't just keep getting better and better at enticement to the short-term with no other social reaction.

[1]: https://thedecisionlab.com/reference-guide/philosophy/system...

reverendsteveii 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

We talk about capitalism being really good at serving revealed preferences, but the thing becomes a bit more twisty when you start talking about capitalism and mass media's ability to shape those preferences. From Bernays to Chomsky we have reams of literature about how mass media is used to tell people what they want, then capitalism supplies it to them, then mass media tells them how free and blessed they are to receive just what they want.

Definitely hard agree on the split between slow, deliberative, rationally-focused thinking and quick, subconscious, emotional, pattern-seeking thinking and the way that most people to their own detriment don't ever examine which of those two they're doing. Hell, I still pretty regularly have trouble differentiating between thinking and reacting and I'm the kind of nerd who spends a lot of time thinking about how I think.

anonymars 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Ultimately capitalism "works", but only if externalities are incorporated into the price.

Hence vice taxes on liquor, cigarettes, the short-lived Bloomberg tax on soda. See also - carbon pricing.

What would that look like for social media, I don't know. If we're truly brainstorming, what if Facebook were forced to charge you cash money for usage beyond a half hour per day? Or past a certain amount of posting?

I'm well aware that politically this would die even faster than the soda tax... selling a policy is often more difficult and important than policy itself

9rx 7 months ago | parent | next [-]

> selling a policy is often more difficult and important than policy itself

Policy needs a villain. After all, if everyone were on the same page acting in good faith, you wouldn't need policy. The people could just start living the life they want to see.

Alcohol points to drunks, cigarettes points to those backlogging hospitals, carbon pricing points to "evil" oil companies trying to destroy the environment. Soda has tried pointing to the obese also backlogging hospitals, but, as you point out, not very successfully.

Your sweet grandmother uses social media and it makes her happy being able to see photos of her grandchildren. It is hard for the average person to find a villain in that.

anonymars 7 months ago | parent [-]

This is an interesting take, and dovetails with something I have long felt: that the Soviet Union pushed to the US to be better, without that competition we've lost something.

I was about to respond to the sibling comment: I think one of the missing ingredients is "shame" (in my example: shame of being bettered by the Soviets). After all, we managed to convince people to spend quite a sum going to the moon...

jerf 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

The main problem the vast majority of policy proposals for this sort of problem face is that the proposals almost invariably slip in the idea of some sort of human being, if not an entire population of humans, that is abstractly above the problem and can be trusted to administer the policy. But if that was the case, we often wouldn't have the problem in the first place.

It's really hard to policy-fix something that literally 99% of the population is doing. Who is going to propose it? Who is going to enforce it? Who is going to pay attention to it?

And to be clear, this is commiseration with you, not argument. I have no solution even in principle.

anonymars 7 months ago | parent [-]

I agree with you. I feel like it becomes the nebulous question of, "how do you change a culture?"

Honestly I think part of that historically came from "shame", but that's certainly out of fashion these days, plus people can just go to their social media bubble to escape it.

I'm starting to think religion was a useful ingredient too: "because God said so" has its uses. "God doesn't want you to mix fabrics, eat pork, or use social media"

thesuitonym 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Or, hear me out, what about "competition exists but I also get to vote and be represented." Where I live, there are two ISPs, the local cable conglomerate, and a telecom coop.

The cable company, as you might expect, is completely and utterly awful. They go for all of cable's greatest hits, from low introductory payments that explode after the first year, to service that is constantly down, to sending you to collections for equipment you returned. They do it all. The speeds are slow, and the customer service is non-existent.

The coop, on the other hand, is beyond delightful. The speed always exceeds what I'm paying for, and every couple of years they readjust their packages to give me more speed for the same price. Only three times in almost a decade have I had any problems with them: One was an outage that was caused by a natural disaster, and the other two were problems with my ONT that were fixed next day at no charge. Oh, and since it's a coop, I get a check every year as part of the profit sharing. For me, it only equates to about a free month of service, but it's still pretty nice.

So I guess the tl;dr of it all is that you don't need to get rid of free markets to have social control of things. And since the profits go to the people paying for the service, there's no incentive to extract extra value, so there's no real enshitification.

ryandrake 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

And, any time some company gets close to "give us what we want and need," the company will be bought by Facebook, or funded by VCs, and new ownership will "correct" the problem.

corobo 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Haha of course. I was probably just one of a mere few hundred million people using it in a way that brought me back to the algorithm so it got scrapped for underutilisation :(

philjohn 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They already send an email or push notification ... so yeah, there would be very little metric movement to justify this as having enough impact for year end PSC.

fallingknife 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

We don't pay them, so really why would they? I don't do work for people who don't pay me either.

jandrese 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

iCal feeds don't bring you into the site. The whole point of Facebook is to be a walled garden that discourages you from going elsewhere. You're lucky they are not like X and deprioritize external links. Or maybe they do, I have not tested it myself.

https://theoatmeal.com/comics/reaching_people

wwweston 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

The popular wisdom is that FB has deprioritized external links -- some accounts on FB are now posting an image with a blurb and then saying "link in comments." I don't know if they're doing it on rumor, official communication, or having tested clickthru rates themselves, but several of these have large enough media operations that all of those sources are plausible.

corobo 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

I would click the link in the event to go say happy birthday to the person! I guess I wasn't the norm though aye, it's big numbers that matter

sunnybeetroot 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Sounds like you use iOS? Add the birthday to the friend’s contact and it’ll appear in your calendar automatically. You’re welcome in advance.

corobo 8 months ago | parent [-]

Interesting idea and kinda really makes sense.. I guess at the time I just chucked them into todos as I have plenty of friction free ways to get tasks into Todoist haha.

I'll give it a go, nice one

dspillett 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Facebook is now a birthday-reminder

It isn't even good at that. I'll often see “it was [whoever]'s birthday yesterday” when I did login on the last couple of days, and it didn't bother to mention the fact then. Too many ads and pointless reals to show me on those days, to have space to insert the now/upcoming birthday reminder, presumably.

mrspuratic 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"mbasic.facebook.com" was a vastly simpler UI, and had notably less noise content. Sometimes "back" navigation even worked properly. They killed that last year :/

Were it not for distant family using it, I would almost certainly download my content and nuke my account.

endemic 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Messaging and group chats are the only real social media now

This is accurate as far as I'm concerned. Interacting directly with actual friends; no ads or clickbait content injected.

reverendsteveii 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I was thrilled to find out that I can block facebook.com in my etc/hosts and still have access to messenger. Hard limiting the time I spend being "social" with robots and hostile outsiders has gone from being a good idea to being a survival strategy as we got further into the industrialization of the attention economy.

xyst 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Anybody worth keeping in contact with, I have their phone number.

The only use for Facebook is for the marketplace.

the_af 8 months ago | parent [-]

Sadly for me, there's another use case for Facebook: special interest groups (as in niche groups for hobbies).

When the Great Migration away from phpbb forums and bulletin boards happened, lots of these groups moved to Facebook. I loathed it, but joining the migration was the only way of keeping up with stuff that interested me.

Now there's another Great Migration to Discord, which I won't follow. Real-time chat simply triggers my FOMO and is stressful to me. So any community that moves primarily to Discord will lose me as a member. I suppose nobody will miss me though.

diggan 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Instagram and TikTok are also trending towards content consumption

Huh? They were explicitly built for that purpose, not "trending towards". Without content consumption, those platforms are nothing.

KeplerBoy 8 months ago | parent [-]

I guess he meant content produced by "professional" content creators with the only goal of earning money instead of interesting pictures from your friends' life.

At least that's how I experience Instagram these days. It's a chat app where people send each other content made by others in the DMs.

Very few of the people I know personally have posted in the last few years, but most of them seem to casually use the app to explore whatever the algorithm shows them.

boringg 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Actually it's biggest value is marketplace though the scammers know that too.

wintermutestwin 8 months ago | parent [-]

Marketplace is the absolute worst UX I could imagine.

slt2021 8 months ago | parent [-]

highly overpaid Facebook engineers must be forced to use Marketplace to try to buy their cars, instead of buying from a dealer.

maybe that way they would improve things a bit

yieldcrv 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

(now as in 10 years ago)

bentcorner 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Discord are where the kids are at. But with them going public it's going to enshittify quickly and it's only a matter of time before they move onto something new.

jc_811 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't know if their newsfeed algorithm is broken, or just grasping at straws, but whenever I log in (fairly often simply for FB marketplace) my feed is full of posts and recommendations for things that don't even make sense for me. For example hiking groups that are in a random mid-size city 2,000mi from me. Or student housing groups in a random international city.

I've tried to even provide feedback on them not being relevant, but they still always appear. I don't know, it really does seem that their newsfeed relevancy is fundamentally broken

sethhochberg 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

The thing that always surprised me about this when I still used FB was that they clearly had the expertise available in Meta to do it right because my Instagram ads/recommended content was almost stunningly well-tailored: events I actually wanted to buy tickets to, products that actually interested me, even down to reels from new comedians I find genuinely funny...

My FB feed, by comparison, was almost exactly like yours - not just irrelevant interests, but geographically crazy irrelevant interests.

alex1138 8 months ago | parent [-]

It's almost like once you lose Systrom/Krieger it all goes to shit

(The same people Zuckerberg was accused of bullying out of the company)

dekhn 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think the main Facebook product is basically running on autopilot now- the folks who wrote the pipelines got promoted and went to work on other stuff.

(note that if you click Friends or Feeds you will see somewhat more personal content, but basically, the main stream is just a list of irrelevant garbage)

jonathanstrange 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My girlfriend also gets the same stuff over and over, most of it AI-generated garbage she's absolutely not interested in. No matter how often she selects "not interested", they always come back. Strangely, this started only recently on her account and mine is still comparatively okay. From what I've heard, it's much worse for US users.

One thing that amazes me is that Facebook thinks I'm interested in content I was interested in more than 25 years ago before Facebook even existed. It's mysterious.

1auralynn 8 months ago | parent [-]

Once I looked at the comments for a disgusting AI-generated tiny house picture to see if anyone else knew it was AI-generated and then all it showed me were more disgusting AI-generated tiny house pictures no matter how many times I tried to block it.

rcruzeiro 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I spent over one year being served sponsored content advertising sales of firearms, cloned credit cards and drugs. Last time I logged in, I’ve noticed that I was being served content based on interests of my close friends. For example, a close friend got really into rock climbing, so I got tons of rock climbing meme accounts.

I have now grown tired of all of that and, when I realised that it had been ages since I had seen someone I actually know post anything, I deactivated it all.

Throw9444 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I haven’t had a Facebook account in about a decade at this point, and I recall continually discussing already how useless it was without chronological sorting and recommending you random crap (and I’m not just talking about the ads).

corobo 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

I thought it was being insulting for a while but I guess I did pause on it to screenshot and make a witty post but I'm constantly getting Dull Men's Club, and more recently the knockoff versions haha

Facebook, I'm not into these, and I've told you so! It was just that "Suggested for you: Dull Men's Club" was funny the first time!

jandrese 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Facebook is probably the worst social media company at combating AI bot spam, although it is a tight race with Twitter/X. Even with aggressive pruning of AI generated "content" it's impossible to get ahead. No matter how many bots you block there are 10 more to take their place. I had to abandon the platform.

Facebook doesn't even seem to care that their platform is being strangled with fake posts. At least Twitter/X has the excuse that Elon fired the people who were trying to combat the spam. I don't know what Facebook's excuse is.

robertlagrant 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

YouTube has lots and lots of bot comments as well.

gspencley 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

Not only that, but people have discovered that comments shown to you on YouTube videos are also subject to "algorithmic scoring", based on your preferences, just like video recommendations.

About a year ago a video went viral where someone in a romantic relationship demonstrated that the opinions expressed in comments on videos shown to her differ radically from the opinions expressed in comments on the exact same video when viewed by her significant other using his account.

My wife and I then immediately verified that this was true for us as well.

sebastiennight 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The current trend is, relevant-looking top-upvoted comment followed by a thread where an innocent-looking account will ask an innocent question/request for recommendations, and get a helpful reply from multiple concerned kind "people" recommending the same resource... All AI bots from top to bottom

robertlagrant 8 months ago | parent [-]

Oh yes I used to have this problem. Then I encountered the wonderful Mary Georgina on the internet and her website helped me lots, and I get such great returns! Have you heard of her?

jandrese 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, but who gives a shit about YouTube comments? They've always been useless at best.

robertlagrant 8 months ago | parent [-]

I don't really understand this perspective.

lizardking 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Even worse, YouTube is presently being over taken with AI slop content.

meroes 8 months ago | parent [-]

Haha those "how it's made" thumbnails of a fully formed cake shaped like a car plopping out of a spigot or other nonsense.

GuinansEyebrows 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

can we really measure whether they're bad at something they don't actually earnestly try to do?

mindtricks 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I used to count how many non-friend items there were between friend posts. If I recall correctly, my max count was 20. And similarly to you, when I do see something it's from 3 days ago and feels no relevant to comment or interact with. I know so many people hate Facebook, but I used to really enjoy those small moments with friends where we could interact over small life updates and photos. Now they feed me garbage to groups I've never subscribed to based on some "guess" around my interests.

malexw 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

I've also done this and my record count was 120. 120 sponsored or suggested posts about things I don't care about in between the posts from people I'm actually interested in.

I'll echo what others have said - if social media is dead, it's because they killed it themselves.

jayknight 8 months ago | parent [-]

I use the Social Fixer browser extension to hide suggested content and my facebook home page is almost entirely:

  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' IT Humor and Memes (UNCENSORED / Sanju L
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / 90's Nostalgia
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Xzo
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Tacofficial
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / The Mother of All Nerds
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' Photoshop That / Fatih Trk
  Suggested: click to show/hide 'Reels' /
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / JaredHalley
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Quinn Alexander on air
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Sarah SilvermanVerified account
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / History of Music
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Minor League BaseballVerified account
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Posts which will make you come
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / How About that!
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / The Other 98%
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' Christians who enjoy good clea / Rachel Ballard
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Graeson Mcgaha
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' Ancient history / Jesse Velosa
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Cincinnati Symphony OrchestraVerified ac
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Awesome Science
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Seinfeldism
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Jimlapbap
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / TromboneTimoVerified account
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' Handbell People / Deb Grundman
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Action News 5
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' Harry Potter Memes / PotterzWorld
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Tom Scott
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / The Student Music Organizer
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / PY6CJ - João Grisi Online
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Memes so literal they aren't even memes
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Pittsburgh Symphony OrchestraVerified ac
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' Back To The Future Real Fans!! / Lawrence Neville
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Edson Xhhak
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Raging Mustache
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Tom Papa
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' Historic Film Locations / Mark E. Phillips
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / TromboneTimoVerified account
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Thanks Chipper
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' / Dog Bless You
  Suggested: click to show/hide '${1}' Christians who enjoy good clea / Catherine Lee Rodriguez
brap 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Fun game. I just had 7, then 3, then I gave up after 30. And those 2 friend “posts” were 1. someone sharing a page’s post, and 2. a friend posting what appears to be an automated happy birthday on someone else’s wall. I did not see any actual content from friends at all.

Most stuff on FB seems to be 1. pages I don’t follow 2. ads 3. posts from groups I no longer care about 4. random people who are not my friends but somehow I still get to see their posts in my feed (not even popular posts) 5. sometimes, some uninteresting activity by an actual friend (commented on something, shared something) 6. occasionally a friend’s IG story pops up (I guess these are automatically cross-posted to FB or something)

nyarlathotep_ 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Facebook has devolved to the realm of the unreal now.

I signed-in a few weeks back and the whole thing was just bizarre clickbait, ads, and bizarre clickbait generated image spam.

I really don't see how there's a future for this.

Is this (the abandonment and subsequent mass-sloppification) an American thing?

Is there a user base in other countries? It seems like a relic of a previous era.

burningChrome 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

I've been on Instagram for less than a year for a photography and now my feed regularly includes what people are now calling "rage bait". which I found are people purposefully posting things to get people to engage with their content and are rewarded when more people comment on that content.

I 100% agree that I cannot see a future where people think this is healthy and can continue.

sebastiennight 8 months ago | parent [-]

> I cannot see a future where people think this is healthy and can continue.

The first is not a prerequisite for the second. See: fast-food, car-optimized cities, Electron apps, microplastics, AI-controlled drone warfare, trap music, etc.

gre 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

On my feed I get AI-generated pictures of castles and houses in the woods. There are enough real places where we don't need to make stuff up. Makes me feel bad, actually.

jandrese 8 months ago | parent [-]

Yes. I also got fake airplanes and way too long Wikipedia summaries of random things. It seems to me that there are really only a handful of outfits that really have the Facebook algorithm over their knee. It seems like the sort of thing that content moderators should be able to combat, but Facebook has just sort of given up.

ben_w 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm British living in Berlin, and it's almost that dead to me. 1/3rd irrelevant ads, 1/3rd irrelevant suggested content, 1/6th one single poster who mostly shares political messages that other people created, 1/6th everyone else combined.

bee_rider 8 months ago | parent [-]

I have that “one single poster” guy as well. It is annoying as hell—I even agree with all his politics but, man, it is just overwhelming.

jimt1234 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> In the course of the past decade, though, social media has come to resemble something more like regular media.

That seems accurate to me, and it makes me think of the old-media saying, "If it bleeds, it leads." In other words, anything to get eyeballs/clicks.

Meet the new-media. Same as the old-media.

robotnikman 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Enshitification. Investors want their ever increasing return on their investment, even if it means plastering the product with ads

nyarlathotep_ 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

There are limits to this--at some point it reaches a tipping point, and the people leave.

We've broadly seen this on FB with American Millenials (the "core" original FB demographic, there's only so much people can take or so much "value" they get from sinking their time there.

brainwad 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

It's shit even with an ad blocker. The problem is that there's just very little organic content anymore, because the fad of posting all the time on social media passed. A social media site can't subsist on birthdays, wedding and babies, but that's all people post about these days. The interesting stuff has moved (back) to topic-based groups or pseudonymous forums (like this one).

givemeethekeys 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not sure when they will take it away, but for now, there is a cleaner option - go to Feeds on the left (I use it on the computer), and then Friends (as opposed to All or Groups). That gets you the latest posts from friends in reverse chronological order.

corobo 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

Oh wow I actually forgot about this.

I used to have a bookmark that took me directly to the friends feed but it would seem it just redirects to the homepage now, and the navigating to the feeds fresh just loads within the page rather than via URL (at least on mobile web, m.facebook.com, not checked desktop)

alex1138 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Honestly it feels like a hostage situation

Like some engineer in the company begged Mark like, "Please, people are going to drop your product completely unless you give them some control" (remember Top Stories vs Most Recent?)

And Mark's like "yeah, ok, cool" (it'll be removed in 2 years when said engineer quits/is fired)

esperent 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's because everyone moved over to using Whatsapp groups instead, for the actual social stuff, and TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube for the gratuitous lusting after other people's perfect lives stuff. It used to be that we looked at the perfect shared moments from our friends lives, but this didn't make us feel bad enough so we outsourced it to models backed by teams of experts so that we can compare ourselves to impossible highs and thusly feel only the most exquisite of lows when comparing our own real and therefore often shitty lives.

aprilthird2021 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

This is the right answer, and it's something I believe Meta has also said publicly, that messaging apps have become the family and friends connection machine as people shifted to using mobile phones and messaging became free and able to handle multimedia.

zpeti 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes this is the key point, and I really don't think Zuckerberg is to blame for this. It's just how the market moved. Before tiktok Zuck did actually try and move facebook back to friend territory, but tiktok became such a threat to time spent online they had to shift to "engaging content"

And everyone is in whatsapp groups anyway for personal content...

When Elon bought twitter he bought back the "following" tab on twitter, and frankly, I used it a few times then stopped. It was just boring. Shifting through pages and pages of random content from people I follow is just too much energy.

The fact is, personalised feeds do just work. We hate this, but it works.

It's a bit like sugar, I know it has zero benefit in 2025 eating sugar, but I just do it, because its nice and it works, and it feels good. My brain knows its bad for me, but I just can't resist.

Now you can blame restaurants and ice cream shops for this, but the fact is, if the particular ice cream shop I buy ice cream at closed, or offered less sugar alternatives, it would in fact lose market share. And of course, there are sugar free ice cream shops, but their market share will never be that big.

If facebook wanted to actually stay on top, they were forced into this.

Nursie 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

It’s not universal though - they don’t work for me, I don’t want or care about any of the “value add” in a feed. I don’t want reels, I’m not there for suggestions.

Clearly I’m a minority as I’m sure they have research saying it does drive engagement for large Numbers of people, but Facebook appears to be worse for all that other stuff and as a result is failing everyone.

zelphirkalt 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Long term will show whether it was the right decision by FB. If he now claims social media dead, then maybe already signs are showing, that the decisions were not as smart as he originally thought. Short term thinking kills many businesses.

alex1138 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

And that's fine except people have missed seriously important life updates because of selective post non-showing

Facebook already had people up in arms when the feed was first introduced (probably because Zuckerberg seemingly doesn't believe in privacy as a concept, at all) and now they want to ruin it (especially now but it's been like this for years) by defeating the point of it?

And I do blame him, anyway https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1692122

corobo 8 months ago | parent [-]

Missing things is another one I noticed yeah. In my case it's gigs from local places I actually follow.

Why show an event that happened last Friday? They even know it's time sensitive because it's an event with a date and time attached!

01100011 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Facebook and instagram: less and less posts by real people.

Reddit and other discussion sites: Controlled by "basement dwellers"(i.e. doomers w/ too much free time), trolls and, soon, AI bots. Dominated by groupthink and devoid of friendly discussion.

I think the only exception is my local community page on Facebook. People do seem to be civil(real names and close physical proximity help) and it's all real content.

huijzer 8 months ago | parent [-]

> Reddit and other discussion sites: Controlled by "basement dwellers"(i.e. doomers w/ too much free time), trolls and, soon, AI bots. Dominated by groupthink and devoid of friendly discussion.

I sometimes have the feeling that most HN commenters are also unemployed or in academia and most non-commenting readers are employed.

01100011 8 months ago | parent [-]

Fundamental problem with moderation sites like reddit and HN: discussion is controlled by those with the time to moderate. These are also the least likely people you want controlling the discussion.

If only there was a reputation based site where, idk, people with more accomplishments got more weight...

Twitter is, in a way, like that. I can follow, say, John Carmack, and get things he says or has reposted and ignore content from people I don't care about. I think that's why I still find myself there. It's a high signal-to-noise site where I can still participate(and actually have discussions with high achievers and ignore basement dwellers. Vs say reddit where I'm constantly dragged down into debates with the basement dwellers).

huijzer 8 months ago | parent [-]

> If only there was a reputation based site where, idk, people with more accomplishments got more weight...

Very good point. I personally find Reddit or HN fairer since it doesn’t depend so much on reputation (actually: popularity). But you are right there is a benefit to weighing certain people more. I sometimes wonder whether people like Dijkstra or Feynman would have bubbled up on Twitter too. I guess so. Both were pretty outspoken so the algorithm would pick up on that like people would pick up on Feyman lectures or Dijkstra letters. They had some virality about them.

lizardking 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The moment they started broadcasting any comment I made on any news story to everybody in my network was when it stopped being useful for me. It's one thing for it to be discoverable if people looked, it's another thing to feature every thought I have prominently in the feed of every person I'm connected to. This was probably a decade ago, and I haven't used it much since then.

xuhu 8 months ago | parent [-]

That creeps me out, and probably everyone who realizes it. But, and it's not a tongue in cheek question, why not try to use it to your advantage ?

sunnybeetroot 8 months ago | parent [-]

There are people who live for every ounce of attention, us introverted tech folk probably aren’t the majority of users.

Twirrim 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Likewise, Facebook has become spectacularly useless for me. I've missed important moments in friend's lives for several days because Facebook has decided that shoving random fan pages and adverts are what I actually want to see.

A friend's dad died and I didn't know for 5 days. He was busy dealing with everything that comes with such a major life event, posted it to facebook assuming that would be an effective way to communicate it.

sgregnt 8 months ago | parent [-]

I see posts from my friends all the time. Most of the post in my feed are from friends or groups I follow.

Twirrim 8 months ago | parent [-]

I just did a quick tally. Of the first 26 posts in my feed:

* 11 friends/page/groups

* 15 groups/pages that I haven't followed or interacted with.

Of those, the first post was a friend, the next 5 posts were groups or pages I haven't interacted with. It also shoved reels at me 3 times, further delaying me seeing the content I actually want to see.

Of those 11 posts from people I did specifically try to follow on FB, only 2 were from today (not sure if folks just haven't posted).

One of the posts from a friend was from 6 days ago that has never popped up in my feed before. What's notable to me about that delay is that I saw and interacted with a more recent post of theirs this morning. So I guess they've jumped up in priority in "the algorithm", so now it finally decides to show me it.

Of course, continuing in the grand tradition of "Facebook WTF", I went to scroll back up the feed to look for other signal and it's all gone. It doesn't even reliably show me my wife's feeds. (plus it does have that amazing feature where it'll give me a notification that she just posted/commented on something on facebook, and even lies about the time/date of posting until you refresh the page, while she's literally fast asleep beside me.)

jghn 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I pretty much never use their algorithmic feed. I've switched to going in, selecting `feeds` and then `friends`. There's usually at most a half dozen posts per day. I also belong to some groups, but I'll go to them directly when I want to see what's going on there.

magicmicah85 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Zuck did announce rather recently the Friends feed is more prominent on the app. It’s always been well hidden, but I think they know people are getting sick of the mindless scrolling.

https://www.theverge.com/news/637668/facebook-friends-only-f...

Justin_K 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I’ve basically stopped using the site for all the same reasons. I think it is because their engagement by real human users is near zero. In order to keep it freshfor whoever is left, like seniors hoping for an occasional pic of their grandkids, they fill it with the garbage

caymanjim 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is the primary reason that I'm closer than I've ever been to deleting my Facebook account. I stopped using it in any meaningful way over a decade ago. I think I've posted about six times in the past decade. But I did still check at least a few times a week to see what my friends posted. Now I can scroll for 15 minutes and see only a tiny handful of friend posts, with about six ads and garbage meme posts (not shared by friends, just pure noise injected by Facebook) for each real friend post. I think the ratio is probably even worse than that.

The other day something popped up in the Facebook Android app advertising a new feature to "just see your friends' posts" and when I clicked on that, it really did only show me friend posts and a couple actual ads. I can't find it in the app anymore, though. It's what should be the default view. It's the only thing I will ever care about.

I'm willing to accept a reasonable amount of advertisement as a necessary evil to support the service. What I can't understand is why I'm seeing an endless stream of garbage memes from random accounts that I do not follow and couldn't care less about. Stop "suggesting" things to me. I don't want to "Follow" these morons. I never intentionally interact with any of them, yet I'm flooded with them.

There's little chance of me making it to the end of this year without deleting Facebook entirely. It does nothing to keep me connected to friends anymore, because it hides 99% of their posts unless I view their profiles one at a time, and the few things it does put in my feed are lost in the noise.

Ajedi32 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Facebook has a Friends feed[1] which only shows posts from friends (and ads, but that's a whole other discussion). Even so, like 80% of the posts from my friends are just them re-sharing news articles or random memes; I wish there was a way to block reshares from pages or something like that.

Also, personal pet peeve: Instagram has a way to turn off "suggested posts" in the feed... for 30 days, then the setting gets automatically turned back on. This is such a blatantly user hostile anti-pattern it's almost as bad as if they didn't have the setting at all.

[1]: https://www.facebook.com/?filter=friends&sk=h_chr

rrauenza 8 months ago | parent [-]

It’s odd that in the iPad version, the friends button at the bottom doesn’t take you to the same feed, but rather lists of people to add.

tanjtanjtanj 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

About couple years ago I logged onto Facebook for the first time in nearly a decade to sell something on marketplace. I took a peek at my feed and the set up was:

Post from some guy I barely knew in high school talking about giving all at his job with zero comments or likes followed by Ad, Ad, Ad, Ad endlessly. I just kept scrolling and scrolling and hitting more pages of ads.

I refreshed and got a different single post followed by more ads. I took a short video of the feed to show my friend who worked at Facebook at the time and he said “oh it might do that when it doesn’t know what to show you, if you use it more it will get better”

I asked how it would learn what I liked when it was just showing me ads and he didn’t have a good answer. I guess nobody cares there.

reginald78 8 months ago | parent [-]

And why would some one continue to use it if all it does is show ads? You have to put some cheese on a rattrap if you want the rat to stick his head in it.

bastardoperator 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sad seeing so many people here addicted to drugs.

jasondigitized 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This. My facebook feed is 10% posts from friends, and 90% ads or weird content posts.

tinyhouse 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I actually find Facebook's feed much better than LinkedIn's for example. Meta seems to be pretty good at showing me posts from groups I often visit and even the "random" stuff is pretty relevant (although mostly a waste of time reels). LinkedIn "random" stuff is always the same stupid content that for some reason has 1000+ likes. Twitter is not much better, the push stupid videos, but at least they have the "following" feed that is much more relevant and I usually don't even bother with the "for you" feed.

DrBazza 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Jeez Zucky, I wonder why social is dying. Is it because there's no bloody social between the ads and random algorithm shite anymore?

Well, there is a 'tab' (at least on mobile) that is eventually marked 'Friends' buried inside 'Feeds'. The irony is lost on Zuck I suppose, as that used to be the front 'page' and KSP of Facebook.

All of my friends and family just have big whatsapp groups instead.

Guess what will be the next target of randomly inserted ads?

rootnod3 8 months ago | parent [-]

Pretty sure the next target IS gonna be WhatsApp. Ads inserted at random intervals into groups. Give that whole cycle enough shit iterations and we are back to mailing lists and IRC channels.

carlosjobim 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Your friend feed is here:

https://www.facebook.com/?filter=all&sk=h_chr

corobo 8 months ago | parent [-]

Unfortunately not on mobile web, just takes me to the homepage (even if I replace the www with m to rule out a blanket redirect to mobile)

I guess I could restrict my Facebooking to desktop if it still works there but then I'll visit even less haha

rvba 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There used to be a hidden "only friends" feed - it got removed, or is hidden even better. Also you couldnt default to it.

FireBeyond 8 months ago | parent [-]

On desktop - left sidebar, Feeds > Friends (not Friends at the top level). On mobile (or at least iOS, which I have) the bottom sidebar, second left button Friends are not perfect for me but cut out 90% of the garbage.

enaaem 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Make FB responsible for the information from automatic feeds. No need to regulate fake news and stuff. Just make them liable for offences like scams and defamation.

FB defence would be that they are like a telecom company and aren't responsible what is said over the phone. But if they are pushing scammer to call you, then they should be co-liable.

xbmcuser 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For me social is now family, extended family, siblings, school, high school and university friend groups on whatsapp with just people sharing big news wishing birthdays etc. All the info in the groups is in silo from each group. Where you actually behave in the groups like you would in real life ie differently with different groups.

FireBeyond 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The only ways FB are tolerable to me:

Desktop - left sidebar, Feeds > Friends.

Mobile - Friends button on the bottom menu.

Not perfect, but cuts out 90% of the garbage.

jedberg 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe I'm in a test group, but my interface recently got a "friends only" feed. It's great.

neogodless 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

FWIW this is the only way I use Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/?filter=friends&sk=h_chr

(That plus having FBP installed.)

Still feels like my friends never post any more, except for like 1% of them?

wintermutestwin 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I never load the homepage. Feeds>friends in a firefox container with FBPurity is the only way I’ll touch that abomination.

I also find that I have to mute a lot of over sharers. I feel for those people because I know they are like rats pushing the social lever for some imaginary sense of connection.

yodsanklai 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't see a lot of friends posts, but I see some groups which are pretty active, and sometimes even useful. For instance, local hiking group, people post pictures, organize hike. I thought facebook was dead, but there's still a lot of activity.

spacechild1 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The FB feed has been completely useless for a few years now. I stopped posting a while ago because it didn't really make sense anymore. Meta sucking up to the MAGA crowd broke the last straw for me and I've finally deactivated my account.

ars 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> 6 'pages' ... before I saw an actual friend's post

I opened mine, and the first post was from a friend, as were about 75% of the remainder of the posts. The other 25% were from Facegroup groups I joined.

There were zero news stories, and zero AI stuff.

vel0city 8 months ago | parent [-]

Yeah, this experience could really vary from person to person. I wonder if this person has anyone in their "friends" actually regularly posting? If nobody in their network is posting anything, there's not posts from their network to appear.

chpatrick 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I highly recommend the FB purity extension to remove all that crap: https://www.fbpurity.com/

zeroonetwothree 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I just opened Facebook (for the first time in months) and 3 of the top 5 stories are from friends. Not sure why you have such a different experience.

rootnod3 8 months ago | parent [-]

I tried the same a while back. I am now pretty sure it's part of the algorithm. If you stay away long enough, it reels you back in to scrolling by showing you some important updates first and before you know it, it draws you back into the abyss of AI generated content and ads and influencers.

edit: s/tells/reels

intrasight 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just filter everything out that's not an actual post by a friend. Filter out news, shares, ads, etc - all that nonsense.

notwhereyouare 8 months ago | parent [-]

you can't. they don't give you a filter to show just friends. you have to slog through all the "recommended" posts

intrasight 8 months ago | parent [-]

I didn't say to use a filter that they provide. It's your "user agent" - have it do your bidding.

I use FBP: https://www.fbpurity.com/faq.htm

EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Is there a setting to only show content from friends? Last used FB 13 years ago.

neogodless 8 months ago | parent | next [-]

On web site - https://www.facebook.com/?filter=friends&sk=h_chr

EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 8 months ago | parent [-]

Can't see that - requires a login. So, there is a setting. Believe you.

dtauzell 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

They have a friends feed which will also include some adds

8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
nimbius 8 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

correction: my Social Media site Is Over.

szundi 8 months ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]