| ▲ | The bottleneck might be the air in the room(blog.mikebowler.ca) |
| 482 points by gslin 7 hours ago | 298 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | gpt5 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I really wish a Apple or another major OEM would integrate CO2 monitor into watches or smartphones. Suddenly, everybody would be aware of the CO2 level in the room, get alerts, etc. and the problem will just solve itself. There are so many rooms, classrooms, movie theaters and other places with poor ventilation where you just feel dizzy, or fall asleep, not knowing it was just due to lower oxygen levels in your blood. Raising awareness is the only real solution. |
| |
| ▲ | throw0101a 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > There are so many rooms, classrooms, movie theaters and other places with poor ventilation where you just feel dizzy, or fall asleep, not knowing it was just due to lower oxygen levels in your blood. Raising awareness is the only real solution. Not wrong, but it is perhaps worth noting that there are already standards for proper ventilation. Generally you're looking at 5–10 cfm/person (2.5-5 L/s), depending on the facility and purpose of the room; see Table 6.2.2.1 in ASHRAE Standard 62.1 for the US: * https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/technical%20resources/... Maybe set up a monitor, but if the room/facility has recently been renovated and meets modern (>2013) building codes, this 'should' have already been taken into account. | | |
| ▲ | josephg 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Should… Whenever I travel, I bring a CO2 meter with me. It’s amazing how often the air is bad. Often in unexpected places. My meter hit 3100 in an uber once. I didn’t even notice until I got to my hotel room and looked at the data log. It was a fresh, hot day outside. The uber had windows closed and AC on. I bet he had no idea - but he was driving with significant cognitive impairment. Takeoff and landing in planes are always the worst. If you get sleepy as the plane is taking off, it’s not you. The plane’s ventilation doesn’t work properly when the plane is stationary. So before a plane is in the air, they often hit 2500. | | |
| ▲ | quickthrowman 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | When was the last time you had that sensor calibrated properly with a can of test gas and a multimeter? | | |
| ▲ | colechristensen 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Take it outside, as long as it measures 400-450 it's probably good. Metrology calibration is necessary if you want accuracy better than 10%, but most of us don't care at all about that, instead we care about increments of 200ppm or more. |
|
| |
| ▲ | II2II an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Building codes that address this are wonderful, however: - Plenty of people live or work in older buildings, where are not up to standard. For example: my office probably violates the air quality sensibilities of the Victorian era, which is when it was originally built. - Equipment breaks down, isn't operated properly, or wasn't installed correctly. Having monitors that measure air quality is an extra check. While you may not be able to get direct action upon a consumer sensor, it can help you push for action. I've been in buildings of varying quality over the years. I've seen how it takes time to get people in to do air quality testing. Heck, I saw the government claim that the air quality was acceptable in schools during the pandemic because the schools had passive ventilation systems. That meant they could open windows. (To be fair, the air quality in most of those buildings was probably fine since that was how the buildings were designed. That said, such standards make it easy for some buildings to slip through the cracks.) So yeah, sensors to the people! | |
| ▲ | xyzzy_plugh an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is correct, but there's still a lot of opportunity to do better. I've been involved with the build out of several office spaces in new and old buildings. We always took this sort of thing seriously and measured each room independently for a week (many at a time) ensuring we accounted for periods of high occupancy. This let us tune the HVAC systems to operate more efficiently, ensuring comfortable temperatures and air circulation. Every time I've seen this done there were structural deficiencies that required remediation, some times it meant adjusting duct work. Most modern office buildings are designed to be a platform for constructing spaces, as spaces usually evolve and change between leases and tenants. They're designed to accommodate this sort of thing. However I've found that no build out nails this the first time. It's very hard! Often times things look fine but once you get people in the space things change drastically. It requires time and effort to address. Several of my offices had such good air that I'd prefer being there over pretty much anywhere else -- even outside on poor AQI days. I've also found that a lot of offices don't do any of this and their air quality is noticeably poor. And lastly I've found that the oldest buildings, including schools -- and I'm talking really old -- have very good air because they are so incredibly leaky. They're usually harder to cool and heat, though. | |
| ▲ | wouldbecouldbe an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think modern domestic houses its the opposite. At least in Netherlands insulation is such a strong focus, due to climate change I think, that modern appartments have terrible ventilation | | |
| ▲ | HPsquared an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Heat recovery ventilation is the answer to this. You also get the benefit of being able to filter it. | |
| ▲ | OptionOfT an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How modern? We built or house in Belgium in 2016, and it was completely sealed, very well insulated, but the air quality was good because we had mechanical ventilation. Clean air blown in, stale air extracted which then went through a heat exchanger. The only issue this house had was it overheated. We had glass facing south. Even in winter it instantly became too hot. | |
| ▲ | hydevito an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Stayed at a beautiful new house in Finland, with five people instead of the usual two, the CO2 detector intermittently went off while we were sleeping. Which the hosts assured us was a faulty detector. They also spoke to how extremely energy efficient the house was, to us it seemed like there wasn't enough ventilation, to improve the insulation. Against their wishes, I slept with all windows fully cracked, which was only ~2 inches due to the "efficient" design. | | |
| ▲ | pieterhg an hour ago | parent [-] | | This was probably CO not CO2? A CO2 monitor doesn't "go off", it just silently reports. CO would go off because it's deadly to have a CO leak. |
| |
| ▲ | avhception an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | A friend of mine recently moved to a modern apartment, built only a few years ago to a very high isolation standard (Germany). I stayed over night and slept on his couch, the air got really really dry and stuffy. It was really uncomfortable. |
|
| |
| ▲ | microtonal 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think the issue is that the common tech requires sensors in an air-chamber. E.g. NDIR works by firing IR at a frequency that is absorbed by CO2. A sensor on the other side either measures the amount of IR light that got through (optical NDIR) or pressure/sound waves (photoacoustic NDIR). I guess that it's hard to use any existing sensors, because they are relatively large and probably water could easily get into the chamber. Would be extremely cool if Apple, Samsung, and others can crack this, though I think they'd have done it already if it was easy. | | |
| ▲ | NathanielK 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Sensiron STCC4 uses thermal conductivity sensing thats very compact (4x4x1.2mm). It's pretty new to the market, but maybe in the future it'll happen. | |
| ▲ | londons_explore 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Oxygen sensors used in car catalyst systems use a different effect based on electrochemistry. I see no reason that couldn't be minuaritized to grain-of-sand size. The question is if oxygen levels are as good an indicator as CO2 levels... I suspect not. | | |
| ▲ | GuB-42 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Based on numbers, O2 concentration is probably not a good indicator. Clean air contains about 20.9% O2 and 0.04% CO2. At 2000 ppm CO2, which according to the author is bad enough to impair judgement, that's 0.2% CO2, it that CO2 is the result of respiration, it means that about 0.2% O2 was consumed, so that's a drop from 20.9% to 20.7%, a very small difference. 20.7% is not low enough to have a significant effect, the CO2 itself is the problem, not the drop in O2. And using O2 concentration as a proxy for CO2 doesn't look reliable to me: the difference is small and other things, like humidity can affect O2 concentration. As for the sensor, O2 sensor in cars compare the O2 concentration between the outside air and exhaust gases, it needs outside air as a reference, but what you are measuring is the outside air itself, you don't have that reference. | | |
| ▲ | kryogen1c an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | >that's 0.2% CO2, it that CO2 is the result of respiration, it means that about 0.2% O2 was consumed, I dont know anything about human respiration, but I know a little about chemistry and theres no reason to assume this is true. Basic stoichiometry. According to a random article on the internet[1], nominal co2 production is 80% of oxygen consumption. Your point appears broadly correct, just wanted to point out some faulty reasoning that could lead to incorrect results in the future. [1] https://societymechanicalventilation.org/wp-content/uploads/... | | |
| ▲ | GuB-42 36 minutes ago | parent [-] | | CO2 concentration doesn't start at zero, and by coincidence, if CO2 production is 80% of oxygen consumption, consuming 0.2% oxygen results in 0.16% CO2, add it to the base 0.04% and you get 0.2%. |
| |
| ▲ | jmb99 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > O2 sensor in cars compare the O2 concentration between the outside air and exhaust gases, it needs outside air as a reference Source? | | |
| |
| ▲ | roland35 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I had a project miniaturizing nasa tech for detecting hypoxia with o2 and CO2 sensors. It used a phosphorescent dye that changed a delay flash (ie you blinked a light, the dye would absorbed and blink back after a delay) based on temp and o2. CO2 was measured with infrared but water also absorbed it, so you need to heat things up enough to not have water. It can be small, but not watch small. All and all interesting stuff! | |
| ▲ | picture 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Electrochemical pile style oxygen sensors continuously deplete themselves whether actively measured or not. Common smart home oxygen piles have a fixed lifetime of a few years, and they're quite sizable (probably about as much volume as a whole smartwatch). Putting the same chemistry in an even smaller package would likely result in lifetime measured in hours | | |
| ▲ | pfdietz an hour ago | parent [-] | | I assume this is because of diffusion of materials at elevated temperature. The sensor would, I think, require a lower temperature than an electrolyzer, since the current would be much lower. But it would be best if lower temperature solid oxide electrolytes could be discovered. |
| |
| ▲ | Lwerewolf 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The ones in cars need to be heated up quite a bit in order to work, and you still need reference air. Otherwise, I'm pretty sure that CO2 isn't a problem but rather an indication of a lack of oxygen in the first place, so it technically could work... just not if you're measuring the environment itself. | | |
| ▲ | XorNot 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is in theory not a problem: getting an oxygen sensor to 700 degrees if it's a tiny spec on a chip is not necessarily hard or would even require a lot of power. But...oxygen concentration is essentially indepedent of CO2. We measure CO2 at part per million levels, whereas O2 is 20% of the air. (In that context CO2 is surprisingly toxic given that 1000 ppm can impair mental acuity). | |
| ▲ | OutOfHere 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | No, it's nonsense to assert that CO2 is due to a lack of oxygen. |
| |
| ▲ | noja 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don’t think we actually care about co2 levels. I think we use them as a proxy for o2 levels (same as our bodies do). So your idea would be great. | | |
| ▲ | lelanthran 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > I think we use them as a proxy for o2 levels (same as our bodies do). Probably. ISTR that depriving a body of oxygen results in a different response than overloading the body on CO2. It's why if you completely displace all air in the room with CO2, people choke, panic, etc, but if you use Nitrogen, people just keel over dead without realising it. | | |
| ▲ | mathgeek 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The evolved response to CO2 is part of the human body’s ability to filter and remove CO2 via the respiratory system. AFAIK we don’t have similar capacity for Nitrogen because it’s not a primary waste product of that system. | | |
| ▲ | wongarsu an hour ago | parent [-] | | Dissolving CO2 in water creates some carbonic acid (H2CO3) that will decompose back to water and CO2 when the CO2 concentration drops. Blood has a fair bit of water, and carbonic acid is much easier to detect than oxygen or nitrogen gas We evolved to detect CO2 because that's by far the easiest thing to detect that's still a reasonable proxy for the performance of our respiratory system |
|
| |
| ▲ | vintermann 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm pretty sure that in a room where we replaced nitrogen with co2, we would be dead even if O2 concentrations were the same. Something about partial pressure. I notice AI explanations agree with me (not going to copy and paste them). | | |
| ▲ | foobarbecue 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | EDIT: ignore this; I was confused / misinformed It's about pH. CO2 creates carbonic acid when it dissolves in water. Your blood pH, in turn, controls how much you feel like you need to breathe. So with high CO2, your respiration rate slows down, and that can lead to low oxygen levels. Note that the physiology and biochemistry of this is complicated (e.g. blood is a very good pH buffer and it's actively regulated by kidneys etc) and it's very much a nascent field of research, so I think AI will be overconfident and hallucination-prone. Source: I worked in high-co2 caves for my PhD so have read about this a lot. I always carried a CO2 monitor. Our rule was to get out if we saw 20,000 ppm or greater. I spent thousands of hours above 10,000ppm. | | |
| ▲ | ahartmetz 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | My medical student flatmates were talking a lot about acidosis and alcalosis :) It was the first time that I heard about them. These basically never happen if your body and environment are halfway decent, but they are important in exceptional situations. | |
| ▲ | dummydummy1234 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Wouldn't high CO2 make you breath faster? | | |
| ▲ | foobarbecue an hour ago | parent [-] | | Interesting, the linked article does say that. Pretty sure I learned the effect was the opposite (high CO2 --> slower respiration). Note that that was ~15 years ago when I would have read that. Maybe I just misunderstood, or thinking has changed. edit: reading now I see I was wrong about this. Thanks for the correction! |
| |
| ▲ | jijijijij an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | You are right about the pH implications, but respiratory acidosis leads to hyperventilation, not hypoventilation. CO2 will kill you regardless of oxygen supply. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercapnia |
|
| |
| ▲ | XorNot 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is extremely wrong: CO2 impairment kicks in around 1000 ppm[1] possibly lower. You can hit this breathing by yourself in an unventilated 3x3m room (literally measured in my house). 1 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4892924/ | | |
| ▲ | spockz 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | You hit it even easier when driving in a car with the internal circulation turned on to keep nasty fumes out. | | |
| ▲ | uxhacker 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | In a car with Recirculation Mode on Levels routinely spike between 1,500 and 4,000 ppm within 20 to 30 minutes. I wonder how many driving accidents can be saved by having a co2 monitor in the car. |
|
| |
| ▲ | dgellow 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What makes you think that? | |
| ▲ | OutOfHere 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Huh. You don't know that, and are making it up. It's almost certainly false. | |
| ▲ | noosphr 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | We do. |
|
| |
| ▲ | kingkawn 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Mesh with the other Apple/et al devices in the room to take multiple samples and aggregate the results for an overall picture of the ambient co2 | | |
| ▲ | stonegray 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Just waiting for the followup post on HN: How I sent CO2 warnings to my entire office using an ESP32 | |
| ▲ | amelius 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What if a movie theater puts an Apple CO2 meter next to an air inlet? Everybody will think the air is safe. | | |
| ▲ | kingkawn 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | If that’s the sole source and the application does thoughtful analysis it could determine that there are sections of the room that are better than others, yes | | |
| ▲ | amelius an hour ago | parent [-] | | But realistically, using what sensors? And (maybe less realistically) what if the theater puts 5 Apple sensors inside a sealed CO2-free chamber, spread around the room? | | |
| ▲ | kingkawn an hour ago | parent [-] | | That’s the point of this thread that each device would have a small sensor that would sync and aggregate with others in the room | | |
| ▲ | amelius an hour ago | parent [-] | | I think the thread established that CO2 sensors are too bulky for that. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | legulere 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I guess the problem is with the price of the sensors. Just look how expensive the Aranet 4 home shown in article is. There are worse devices for less like the IKEA alpstuga. I also don’t know how much electricity they pull. | | |
| ▲ | Liftyee 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I would hesitate to say the IKEA is worse. Inside the IKEA is a reputable Sensirion all in one sensor module. It's much cheaper and smaller because the CO2 sensor in it is using different (newer) technology that only released a few years ago from Sensirion. (Upd: the IKEA does have lower accuracy, with ±100 ppm instead of ±30 ppm. From the SEN63C datasheet) | | |
| ▲ | yoshuaw 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Worse specs? Sure. Worse value? I don't think so. Worse accuracy? Perhaps not either. A price of 30 EUR makes this sensor really easy to pick up. For the same price as one Aranet (~180 EUR) the typical household can place a sensor in every room of the house. Which provides far more accurate readings for the whole house than just one high-end sensor in one room. | |
| ▲ | microtonal 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | No, it is crap. Yes, it is Sensirion, but it uses a thermal conductivity sensor, which is a very indirect method of measuring CO2. One part of the sensor emits heat and the other senses it and the idea is that heat transfer changes with different CO2 concentrations. However, a lot of other factors influence this as well, such as ambient temperature/humidity (which is why the sensor incorporates measurements from an SHT sensor), but also gas mixture, etc. You only get good readings at lab conditions. Even below 1000 ppm, I would often see readings that are 300 ppm from more expensive, known-good CO2 meters. If you want a CO2 meter on the cheap, either wire up an optical NDIR sensor like the SenseAir S88 (22 Euro) up to an esp32, which is possibly the best sensor you can get for the money (slightly cheaper version of the sensor that the AraNet4 uses). Or if you want something standalone with a display, get the SwitchBot Meter Pro CO2 for ~50 Euro, which uses a photoacoustic NDIR, but is still miles better than the sensor in the ALPSTUGA. Can also be hooked up with HA through an ESPHome BLE proxy or with the SwitchBot Hub. You can find a comparison of the IKEA sensor with other affordable sensors here: https://danieldk.eu/hardware/smart-home/ikea-alpstuga (Upd: the IKEA does have lower accuracy, with ±100 ppm instead of ±30 ppm. From the SEN63C datasheet) You forget to mention that it is ±100ppm plus ±10% of the ambient ppm, which makes a big difference. At 1000ppm it's ±(100ppm + 0.10*1000) = 200ppm and that's only in an environment with 25C, 50% RH, and 1013 mbar. So, that does not tell you much, given that thermal conductivity is very sensitive to environmental factors. | | |
| ▲ | nok22kon 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | if you just want to know if CO2 is too much, 300ppm precision is fine. I dont need to know the exact level, just give me a green/yellow/red LED and make it cheap so I can have a sensor in every room | | |
| ▲ | microtonal 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | No, it's not. You generally want to ventilate an office when you reach 1000ppm, but then the IKEA will often warn you already at 700ppm. 700ppm is fine. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | "Generally" is a vibe measurement to begin with. You won't notice any difference at all between 700ppm and 1000ppm. It's once you start hitting 2000ppm you are getting noticeable brain fog. | | |
| ▲ | Hikikomori 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Had bad ventilation in my old apartment (built 1888) so got a co2 monitor. Started feeling the effect at 1100-1300ppm, so would open it in home assistant and check, never below and never above really. During winter when it was -10 so couldn't keep the window open all the time. | |
| ▲ | OutOfHere 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I disagree. I feel a very steady and progressive deterioration starting at 600 ppm. It becomes significant at 800 ppm. The studies back up the latter threshold. | | |
| ▲ | quickthrowman 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | You would not notice a difference if you weren’t checking the CO2 ppm. You primed your brain to ‘feel’ the effects of higher CO2 by reading a study and are experiencing the nocebo effect. If it makes you feel better I don’t see a problem with it. | |
| ▲ | teiferer an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Unfortunately it will be hard for you to know how much of that effect is placebo. Unless you tested this with some kind of double-blind setup. |
|
| |
| ▲ | andrew_lettuce 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You generally want to ventilate almost continuously, so if a circulation fan kicks on at 700 instead of 1000 that's really not a big deal. | |
| ▲ | nok22kon 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | you assume that the error will always be in one direction and if sometimes you ventilate a bit sooner than required, at 700, what? businesses will not put $200 meters in every room | | |
| ▲ | wongarsu an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Have you looked at the prices of meeting room furniture? A $200 meter is not a significant cost measured against what it costs to furnish the room in the first place. It only becomes significant is you treat it as a line item disconnected from the room it's in | |
| ▲ | microtonal 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | businesses will not put $200 meters in every room There are good $50 Euro meters. Besides that, I am not sure if that is true, at my wife's workplace, they put high-end CO2 meters in every larger room where multiple people meet. Admittedly, this was during COVID, so a lot of organizations were using CO2 levels as a proxy for finding whether a room was properly ventilated. | |
| ▲ | sscaryterry an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | $200 is nothing compared to the lost productivity. | |
| ▲ | spockz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Presumably there is still the need to ventilate. So the concentration can also be measured more centrally. That is how the mechanical ventilation unit in my house works. For both humidity and CO2. | |
| ▲ | doobiedowner 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You put one CO2 sensor in the return air duct and tie it to outside air control. |
| |
| ▲ | Scroll_Swe 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | But if I open a window at 700ppm, so what? | | |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | Gigachad 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I got the ikea sensor, I’d say it’s way more accurate than you need for personal use. I wouldn’t use it as a scientific instrument but it’s well good enough to see if the room is ventilated enough. I was shocked to see just how fast CO2 climbs while in a room, and how just opening the window just a crack was enough to restore the room to baseline co2. The thing runs on usb 5v so the power consumption is negligible. It also plugs in to home assistant great. | | |
| ▲ | microtonal 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I have HA send me a notification to ventilate my office when the air reaches 1000ppm CO2. The IKEA ALPSTUGA is often off by 300ppm even under 1000ppm. If I'd use it, I'd be getting notifications at 700ppm. It is a thermal conductivity sensor, which is a very indirect way of measuring CO2 and is very sensitive to environment factors. You only get somewhat good readings in lab conditions. Don't by the ALPSTUGA for anything but very rough trends, there are much better affordable options. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Within 300 ppm is more than good enough. Realistically 1000 ppm is not that bad. The average meeting room is multiples of that. Also in my experience it’s much more accurate than that. | | |
| ▲ | microtonal 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I notice that thinking becomes less clear when going above 1000ppm, so I let HA send a notification at 1000ppm. With ALPSTUGA it would send already at 700ppm. By the way, above 1000 the divergences become even larger due to the inaccuracy also being 10% of the ambient CO2 concentration (in optimal circumstances, probably larger IRL). So, suppose you want to be notified at 2000 ppm, the IKEA sensor might already do so at 1500 or 1600 ppm and it continuously drifts, so it's not like you can use a particular offset. Besides that, what's the point? There are much better meters in a similar price class. As an additional benefit, they can last months or up to a year on two AA batteries. ALPSTUGA is an inferior product. | | |
| ▲ | summm 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Can you recommend some? | | | |
| ▲ | Scroll_Swe 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | >With ALPSTUGA it would send already at 700ppm. "oh no I am getting too much fresh air" I get your point but come on. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | odiroot 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Can it work with Zigbee network or is Matter/Thread required? | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm using a bunch of IKEA's "smart home" stuff, all via Zigbee+HA, works great. Look for the Zigbee icon on the package, and the pairing for Zigbee vs their own home controller might have slightly different pairing sequence on the device, otherwise it just seems to work. | | |
| ▲ | microtonal 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | ALSTUGA does not work with Zigbee. They recently overhauled their lineup and replaced all Zigbee devices by Thread + Matter. Some of the new devices (mostly those who support TouchLink, e.g. some of the lights) have a secret pairing mode with which you can use them with Zigbee, but it's only a subset of the new products. | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > They recently overhauled their lineup and replaced all Zigbee devices by Thread + Matter. Uuh, seems not keeping up with social media finally backfired. That sounds horrible! So far IKEA been a great experience when it comes to HA+Zigbee stuff, and I started buying stuff relying on they'd keep just keeping up with that, really sad to hear they've changed course. The "secret pairing mode" stuff sounds the same as currently/before though, but they only do so for a subset is new and hope they again change their mind. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Thread is significantly better. Zigbee relied on proprietary hubs and apps or hacky work arounds. Matter over thread devices don't need a brand specific hub or app. You can literally control the new ikea products direct from a modern iphone which includes a thread radio, no hub, server or app required. If you already own the ikea hub, they secretly put thread radio in it which was just sitting unused in preparation for this range. | | |
| ▲ | microtonal 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's complicated. Matter over Thread is indeed nice in that it you only need generic Thread and Matter servers. It also makes it easier to share credentials between ecosystems. Thread itself is also a pretty nice standard technically. There are also strong downsides though, one is privacy and future cloud lock-in. Zigbee is fully local. Previous Thread standards added the option for NAT64 so that Thread devices can access the internet and there were some Thread + Matter devices that already require internet access for full functionality (IIRC some Nuki smart locks, but I might misremember). However, Thread 1.4 also adds support for Thread devices to get a globally routable IPv6 address. The Thread 1.4 whitepaper is pretty blunt about what this enables: Simplified Cloud Integration: Thread devices can now seamlessly connect directly to cloud services, enabling remote control, monitoring, and over-the-air firmware updates. https://www.threadgroup.org/Portals/0/Documents/Thread_1.4_F... The fact that Thread and Matter are strongly pushed by Google, Apple, etc. should tell you enough. Now, a TBR may simply allow you to disable NAT64 or globally routable IPv6 addresses (e.g. Home Assistant's addons), but many consumer implementations don't. E.g. the Apple TV is a Thread Border Router and does not allow disabling NAT64, so Thread devices can access the internet, send analytics, and can be cloud-controlled. Also, the ecosystem is still pretty immature, as a result of which you can encounter issues, typically resulting in unstable device connectivity. E.g. TREL does often does not work well. Apple has some hacks to fix most of the issues, but it only works well between Apple devices. So it's generally the best to avoid combining multiple TBRs into the same network. | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Thread is significantly better. Better than what already exists and is deployed? I dunnno, hardware already in use always beat "hardware conceptually better but I don't have it", that's why Zigbee is better, for me. Protocols much like everything in the world, isn't correct/incorrect or universally "better", it's all down to use cases. Personally, as someone who started to rely on IKEA providing Zigbee devices, Thread is obviously worse, because 100% of the devices I have are already Zigbee and not Thread. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Ikea preemptively sorted this out by putting thread radio in their hubs years before rolling this out. There's also thread radios in the latest chromecast, apple tv, and loads of other products. If you have a single thread border router in your house from any brand you'll be able to connect to any thread device from any brand. Phones can also directly control thread devices without needing any network or hub. It's a vastly better system and the transition period is so smooth because the smart home companies have been deploying the thread hardware for years before anyone started using it. | | |
| ▲ | microtonal 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | smart home companies have been deploying the thread hardware for years before anyone started using it Also worth mentioning that many modern Zigbee radios can also be Thread thread radios using different firmware. There are even multi-PAN radios that can do Zigbee and Thread at the same time. Some smarthome hubs use multi-PAN (e.g. Homey Pro), but it's generally recommended against now because of lower reliability. The same applies to devices, e.g. some of the new IKEA devices work over Thread or Zigbee (Zigbee pairing is triggered using a non-documented sequence, presumably they added support for TouchLink). Or e.g. the Aqara FP300, which can be flashed with Thread + Matter or Zigbee firmware. It works because the same radio can be used for both protocols. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Hikikomori 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | This wasn't true for zigbee either. I used a zigbee usb stick with home assistant, could use any stick that was supported. |
| |
| ▲ | microtonal 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, I bought a bunch of INSPELNING smart plugs when they were clearing out the inventory. The new GRILLPLATS switches are more compact though, which is nice. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | Gigachad 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It’s part of the new range which is all matter over thread only. The existing ikea hub can do thread though. |
| |
| ▲ | p-e-w 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > The thing runs on usb 5v so the power consumption is negligible. There’s a huge leap from that to the power consumption being low enough to be integrated into a smartphone, as demanded by OP. | | |
| ▲ | progval 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't think power use is the issue. I have this cheap CO2 sensor: https://www.domadoo.fr/en/devices/5882-heiman-zigbee-air-qua...
which draws 0.5W. This includes thermometer and humidity sensor, Zigbee transmission, and acting as a Zigbee router, but it gives us an upper bound.
It also measures continuously (picks up someone breathing on it within 10s), which is overkill. A phone could measure CO2 levels once every 10 minutes which would average under 0.01W, so that would work. However, this assumes the sensor would fit in a smartphone, which is not a given. And these things need air flow. And they also wouldn't work while the phone is in a bag or a pocket. | | |
| ▲ | nnevod 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | >A phone could measure CO2 levels once every 10 minutes which would average under 0.01W, so that would work. Not sure about that, at least NDIR sensors have to be at certain elevated temperature to work and they do some preheating when you turn them on from standby. So it's not possible to just measure less often as then energy would have to be spent on heating the sensor. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | mdf 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Ruuvi Air[1] seems to be close to the middle in both price and CO2 measurement accuracy between aranet4 and the IKEA device. I don't have personal experience with Ruuvi Air specifically, but have been using their cheaper Ruuvi Tags (that don't measure CO2) for temperature, humidity and air pressure measurement at home and office. [1] https://ruuvi.com/air/ | |
| ▲ | SideburnsOfDoom 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I also don’t know how much electricity they pull. It can't be much, since the Aranet 4 can run for years on 2 AA batteries. |
| |
| ▲ | alienbaby an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Is it a tually lower oxygen in the blood that's the problem, or higher co2? I'm not sure if having high co2 automatically implies lower oxygen, I have no idea at all but feels like it may not necessarily be strictly. Linked. Also, are the cognitive issues of low oxygen the same as high co2 or do they produce different effects? | | |
| ▲ | fhdkweig an hour ago | parent [-] | | From what I learned from Apollo 13, even with O2 in the air, CO2 can still be poisonous. |
| |
| ▲ | bhouston 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There is one in the EcoBee Premium and we use it to automatically drive our HRV (heat recovery ventilation.). It is better to have it in the HVAC system than in your phone anyhow: https://ben3d.ca/blog/upgrading-hvac-control | |
| ▲ | jeffybefffy519 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This would probably be the biggest awareness thing tech could do for climate change as well. | |
| ▲ | stein1946 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Raising awareness is the only real solution. You'd have to raise awareness on every single person in the room and them sustain pressure to the organization in order to have proper CO2 levels in the room/organization. And then you have to align every other person on every other organization to do this as well and hope for the best. Or, you can do the right thing and have the state introduce regulations | | |
| ▲ | dan-robertson 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I don’t think that’s right. If people have an easy way to measure the levels, and they can see something on their phone like ‘you spent 8 hours today above 2000ppm CO2’ then the room will care a lot more than it did before, and people will be able to quickly see whether they have improved things. At my employer, I think it took us around 1000 employees until we randomly hired someone who happened to care a lot about CO2 levels and I think they managed to cause a decent increase in the amount that the company cared / thought about levels (this was around the end of Covid though so part of this may have been due to using CO2 levels as an indication of insufficient ventilation/air filtration). | |
| ▲ | joenot443 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Depending on the state, newer buildings do have regulations on air ventilation and quality. The rooms being discussed here are mostly ones which would have been built before this was taken more seriously. Classrooms, older office buildings, etc. NYC is full of buildings which would never pass any code today but are still happily occupied. It’s a trade off, I think. | |
| ▲ | Scroll_Swe 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Can't you just open a window a bit? | | |
| ▲ | hosteur 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | In lots of modern office buildings you can’t. | | |
| ▲ | Scroll_Swe an hour ago | parent [-] | | ah, sadly that was in my last modern one. Thankfully we can open the windows in this one :) Best solution. |
|
| |
| ▲ | b112 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I can just imagine the horrors and skin crawls that your last sentence has evoked in some people's minds. Not the state!! But seriously, so much care needs to be taken here. OK, well "care" at least. Employers certainly would benefit from scrubbing CO2 from the air, in terms of productivity. I'm willing to bet that with central air it would be quite easy, and even with heat and AC off, lots of places still circulate the air regardless. So the central place to scrub is already there. But then you have other issues. Such as, will your body adapt to 8 hrs of reduced CO2, and then you become torpid and barely awake when not at work. Such a horrid thought, that is to me. And what if employers learn that the tiniest boost of O2 helps too! Now your body becomes accustomed to that, and what are the long term effects there? I can personally envision myself being concerned. I guess the legislation could be crafted to "the same CO2 levels found just outside of downtown city core" or some such blather. Maybe even same for O2. So that you're at least pegged to something normal for the area. Maybe that's where the state could come into play. A simple, highly accurate monitoring station which has an API to be polled. Come to think of it, CO2 and O2 rates fluctuate during the 24 hour cycle. Trees need O2 to live, but only produce O2 during the day. And so differing amounts of light might mean up and downs in these numbers. It may be another circadian rhythm. Getting it the same as in a nearby forest, might be the healthiest thing of all. | | |
| ▲ | i_am_proteus 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | In practice, one would use energy recovery ventilation to exchange air with outside rather than a CO2 scrubber (not clear if you actually meant a scrubber). The place to look is existing codes for ventilation. Exempli gratia: https://dos.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2020/09/2020-mcnys... (see PDF page 46). Regulations to enforce outside air being brought into human spaces already exist. I have been in some office buildings in United States which had CO2 monitors in each meeting room, and the ventilation would engage to control CO2 below a set level. We would entertain ourselves by exhausting our lungs onto the sensors to trigger the ventilation system. | | |
| ▲ | b112 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I should have said it more clearly, I just thought HN would take this stance regardless. If you tell an employer to ensure CO2 levels, and it shows an improvement in productivity, employers may think "Hmm. Let's improve this further!" and add O2 as well. In terms of outside air, a lot of US cities I think would not benefit from that, all that much. Especially during certain parts of the day, with a lot of smog. But regardless, all that entered my mind was "Once employers are required to add any form of scrubbing, and perhaps O2 injection, they'll over do it for optimal employee output." Regardless of whether it's helpful once the employee leaves the workplace. I'm not against this, I'm just actually saying the regulation should be locally defined. |
| |
| ▲ | floam 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You’re talking about oxygen like it’s California Rocket Fuel or meth. | |
| ▲ | atoav 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It is not that complicated. You need to introduce CO₂ threshold levels that make sense from a medical standpoint. Then you need to enforce them in the same way other basic environmental regulations or worker rights are enforced in regions of the world where these work. The main question is: If your workplace, city, whatever forces you to work or live in an harmful/unhealthy environment, do you have any realistic course of action to improve the situation? In the US you would call this (gasp) regulation, I would call it a basic human right. If we talk about stairways, nobody complains about building regulations that mandate handrails. CO₂ levels are not totally different. |
|
| |
| ▲ | zeafoamrun 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I was looking at CO2 sensor module boards this week and the sensors themselves are quite large and the floor price is $15ish. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Those $15 ones are also straight up scams. They just estimate (lie) for the readings based on other sensors. | |
| ▲ | bjackman 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | And I believe the accuracy is also not great on these cheap ones. The product in the OP's photo costs $200 where I live! And ISTR finding the sensor itself contributes a lot to this cost. IIUC they also need fans. The one I have in my home has one that's actually integrated into the sensor unit. |
| |
| ▲ | reddozen 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | CO2 and all other air quality indexers have to be very carefully calibrated regularly. It's not some slop you can just throw into a consoomer cheap iot device. Article author completely ignores this for the obvious reasons. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | For the purposes of indoor ventilation monitoring you can calibrate by occasionally exposing the sensor to fresh air. Either taking it outside or just the room not having people in it. The sensor will treat the lowest reading it gets as 400ppm since this is what outdoor air is. A sensor mounted in the office will get calibrated every night when the office is empty. | | |
| ▲ | OutOfHere 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The outdoor CO2 is rising every year. It is not fixed at 400 ppm. The calibrations you speak of are fake. A good sensor can be expected to remain within 10% of reference for ten years. |
| |
| ▲ | OutOfHere 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not really. For ventilation purposes, a good sensor remain within 10% variation for nearly ten years. We are not running a controlled science experiment here. |
| |
| ▲ | scoot 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Apple watches already have a blood-oxygen sensor so it's covered, albeit indirectly. | | |
| ▲ | oasisbob 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I don't think that's true at all. Capnography, the measure of carbon dioxide partial pressure is wholly separate from pulseox: > Pulse oximeters have some limitations. They can only employ light at two wavelengths. Thus the devices can only distinguish between hemoglobin and oxygenated hemoglobin. When carboxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin are also present, there are two additional wavelengths required for differentiation. In the presence of elevated carboxyhemoglobin levels, pulse oximetry overestimates the true saturation of oxygen as carboxyhemoglobin binds with a higher affinity than oxygen. In the case of carbon monoxide poisoning, the absorbance spectrum of carbon monoxide is very similar to hemoglobin, which results in a falsely high level of oxygen (overestimation of oxygen saturation) ... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539754/ | | |
| ▲ | benj111 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | >Pulse oximeters have some limitations. They can only employ light at two wavelengths Why only 2? |
| |
| ▲ | Terr_ 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't think that's safe to assume at all, for two reasons: 1. CO2 has effects on the human body of its own that aren't simply a lack of oxygen, and vice-versa. [0] 2. The baseline proportions involved aren't close, so even doubling CO2 isn't going to show up easily as a large swing in in oxygen%. For example, the article references a study where the CO2 proportion going from 0.04% -to 0.25% correlates to mental problems. Even if the watch could sample atmosphere directly, is it sensitive enough to detect a shift from 21.00% -> 20.79% oxygen? As it's estimating oxygen in the owner's blood, it might not detect anything different at all... not if the owner's body has already compensated by breathing harder or by "underclocking" their brain to make dumber decisions. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asphyxiant_gas | | |
| ▲ | ErroneousBosh 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | > The article references a study where the CO2 proportion going from 0.04% -to 0.25% causes mental problems. In other words, a difference in 0.21% of the air. I'm finding that pretty difficult to believe, to be quite honest with you. And before you say "aha, carbon dioxide brain fog!" consider that I'm about a mile from the sea with a 40mph onshore breeze. This air is about as oxygenated as it gets. | | |
| ▲ | anon7000 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It makes a lot of sense actually. You get severe symptoms when CO2 makes up only a couple % of the air. And can become fatal at like 5%. There’s not like a hard line where you suddenly die, it’s a gradual thing. It very much makes sense that we’d notice minor symptoms at a few thousand PPM when it only takes like ten thousand to feel it severely. | |
| ▲ | Hikikomori 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I got a monitor as we had an old apartment with bad ventilation. When I started feeling it I would check and it was always around 1200ppm and would open a window for a bit. Outside air is around 420ppm, but that's not the problem, enclosed and badly ventilated rooms are if you spend a few hours in there. | |
| ▲ | Terr_ 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | 1% (10,000 ppm) is enough for the person to become aware something is odd through drowsiness or an elevated heart rate. I don't think it's too far-fetched for a quarter of that to cause subconscious cognitive effects, that could be measured in tests. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | deanc 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’m not saying this isn’t a legitimate concern but this really seems to have exploded amongst the tech community as the next obsession. I see this pop up on X every few weeks. Is the concern about this really based on actual science? Is there empirical data proving people are less productive or are damaging themselves as a result of heightened CO2 levels? And I don’t mean observational epidemiology studies. |
| |
| ▲ | bluerooibos 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Anecdotal, but I'm convinced it screws up sleep quality. I'd just accepted for the longest time that waking up groggy with a slight headache and tired was the norm until I put a CO2 monitor in my room. With the door closed, it climbed up to 1500ppm in under an hour. I'm certain many people are sleeping in similar conditions without realising and ventilating their rooms properly or leaving the door open. | | |
| ▲ | mft_ an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Higher CO2 vs. free cat access at 4:17am. No win scenario! | |
| ▲ | rahimnathwani 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | And window. | | |
| ▲ | Aspos 34 minutes ago | parent [-] | | An open window means kilowatts of energy wasted. All the air I spent money cooling will just leak out.
It also means all the pollen will be let in. |
|
| |
| ▲ | bjackman 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | IMO it's something where an intervention is often cheap enough that it's worth it even without great evidence. But also bear in mind that regardless of "are we operating at max effectiveness", OSHA sets a legal limit of 5000ppm in a workplace, and that's about _safety_. This article is talking about keeping levels below 1000 which is a very high standard IMO (still arguably justified given the studies mentioned). But if you are in a poorly ventilated home office you could easily hit 3000. At that point you are closer to "illegal in the US" than "earth's atmosphere". So yeah even if you are unconvinced about micro-optimising your CO2 levels there's a very long established argument in favour of at least paying _some_ attention to it. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's not even that hard to optimise at home. I've found simply leaving the door open to the rest of the house causes the room CO2 to not elevate much over baseline outdoor readings. Or just opening a window just a crack will rapidly remove all excess co2. The real problem is offices and meeting rooms where you have 10 people in a small box for hours and windows that don't open. |
| |
| ▲ | paufernandez 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | We assume sometimes that everybody experiences this in the same way, but a lot of people might be super-sensitive to it, and others completely immune. It is quite possible that the ones obsessing about it are the sensitive ones, because they feel it much more. | |
| ▲ | dgellow 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Worst case people open windows without effect, no? | | |
| ▲ | bell-cot 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Nope. Opening windows is very often disallowed - whether socially, or you'd need a hammer, or the space doesn't have windows. Or opening windows would have other downsides - letting in rain, or too-hot/too-cold air, or pollution, or ... | | |
| ▲ | cucumber3732842 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Can't let those stupid workers open a window and ruin the efficacy of the precisely engineered hvac system that lets the building hit LEED Platinum or whatever | | |
| ▲ | bell-cot 40 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yeah. But even when you can, how many bosses might forbid it - because there's already too many arguments over the thermostats, or it's kinda noisy outside, or HR warned 'em of lawsuits for doing that when the air pollution numbers are elevated, or whatever? |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | raffael_de 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That is also my impression. CO2 build up provides a neat opportunity to carry around sensors, track something, display graphs and formulate quantifiable sets of rules. And also is a (more or less) interesting topic to discuss with others. Seems highly appealing to a large part of the crowd here. Personally, I only observed that some people are obsessed about having always one or more windows open but I never personally experienced any non-obvious problems with CO2 buildup. At some point the air is just smellably getting thick and then you just air out. Wouldn't need sensors for that. | |
| ▲ | kashishgrover 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Nh_vxpycEA | | |
| ▲ | deanc 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is not a peer-reviewed study. It's a Tom Scott youtube video. | | |
| ▲ | thrance 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | And the sources he gives in the video's description are really bad. | |
| ▲ | inigyou 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Are we not peers to Tom Scott? | | |
| ▲ | deanc 27 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I appreciate Tom as an educator, but he's not particularly an authority on anything. | |
| ▲ | ohyoutravel 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Only if you watch it on Peertube. The link is explicitly YouTube. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Krutonium 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Somewhat unrelated, Tom also did a great video where he was put in a low oxygen environment. Similarish effects, differentish cause. |
| |
| ▲ | nok22kon 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | how can you detect without a study if CO2 meters are basically nowhere? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4892924/ | |
| ▲ | ifwinterco 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's peak HN meme material because 1) it (allegedly) affects your intelligence which everyone here values highly 2) you can measure it, it's a number 3) requires tech to measure it So perfect for HN, you can obsess over numbers and tech and how to measure it endlessly and overhype the significance to trick yourself into thinking you're doing something useful. You get to have your cake and eat it, no wonder everyone loves this topic. (Also if you're a doomer type you can link this in with rising atmospheric co2 levels for extra points) | | |
| ▲ | raffael_de 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Also this is finally a great reason to order a dozen Arduinos + sensors for a domestic IoT project. | | |
| |
| ▲ | u1hcw9nx 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The article links into two controlled experiments. | |
| ▲ | eastbound 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I’ve lived in Australia and France and I’ve always attributed the taller size of Australians to the excellent state of their ventilation in buildings. Vents (and rooms themselves) are systematically bigger than in France, and if you live in a healthy environment, with meat, lots out outdoors during teen age, and correctly ventilated classrooms during their 20 best years, it makes no secret to me that they grew bigger. Meanwhile in France we heat classrooms by stacking 35 kids in a confined space. It saves on heating, plus condensation that makes windows opaque helps pupils concentrate on the blackboard, as teachers said during my childhood. | | |
| ▲ | throw0101a 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > I’ve lived in Australia and France and I’ve always attributed the taller size of Australians to the excellent state of their ventilation in buildings. Vents (and rooms themselves) are systematically bigger than in France The average male height in France is 178.60 cm, while in Australia it is 178.77 cm: * https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-h... Some sources even have France being higher than Australia: * https://ourworldindata.org/human-height | |
| ▲ | dgellow 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > it makes no secret to me that they grew bigger That sounds like something you made up to justify your beliefs… | |
| ▲ | nkrisc 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | So how does any of that relate to height? From what data I could quickly find, both countries are essentially equal in average height. | |
| ▲ | puttycat 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | France is indeed ridiculously bad at ventilation (not to mention air conditioning). Restaurants, offices, even gyms - most have bad to non-existing ventilation. Coming from the States this is just insanity. |
| |
| ▲ | Scroll_Swe 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I mean try it for yourself... open a window a bit unless you live in a hellhole. Also go for a walk, unless you live in a hellhole. |
|
|
| ▲ | vertnerd 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As a high school teacher, I first noticed this effect when I started using a CO2 monitor in my classroom as a proxy for air freshness during COVID. The CO2 levels in our supposedly "no problem with the air" classrooms shot up to 2000 ppm within minutes of the start of school and stayed there all day. Kids weren't checked out ONLY because I teach mathematics. They were breathing bad air, too. Worse, when I brought the monitor home, I found the levels there were elevated even with no one home and surpassed 2000 with just two or three of us in a room. The good news is that I stopped worrying about making my house "tight" for the sake of energy efficiency. I keep some windows cracked all year and don't worry about how tight the door seals are. |
| |
| ▲ | throw0101a 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > The good news is that I stopped worrying about making my house "tight" for the sake of energy efficiency. I keep some windows cracked all year and don't worry about how tight the door seals are. The point of having "tight" houses is not (just) about energy efficiency but about air quality as well. The general mantra is build tight, ventilate right. It's why modern building codes mandate air tightness and having ERV/HRVs. By having a leaking house you do lose efficiency because in summer the air you paid to cool goes out and the hot-humid comes in, and in winter the air you paid to heat escapes and the cold comes in. But in addition to temperature (and humidity/moisture) you also get things like pollen, brake dust, (depending on your region) wildfire smoke, etc. By ventilating right with ERV/HRV, you remove stale air and bring in tempered fresh outside air that you filter before distributing throughout the building. Air quality is also why 'spot ventilation' is also generally mandated at certain locations like over a cooktop/range in the kitchen, and in bathrooms (where the primary purpose is not taking care of smells (though helpful), but rather moisture from showers/baths). * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIcrXut_EFA * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTBNNhUH5V8 * https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/app/uploads/sites/defau... * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFfH1ljQgN07&t=3m14s | | |
| ▲ | mort96 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I would not want to live in a city where I have to be careful letting in outside air or going outside because there's too much air pollution... | | |
| ▲ | throw0101a 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > I would not want to live in a city where I have to be careful letting in outside air or going outside because there's too much air pollution... 1. Not living in a city (polluted or otherwise) still does not solve the problem of letting out cooled air and letting in hot-humid air in the summer, and letting out warmed air and letting in cold air in the winter. If your CO2 is high are you going to crack open a window when it's -20 outside? 2. Not-city living also has pollen and other allergen leakage. You're also more likely to get wild fire particulates in less urban areas. Building tight and ventilating right is applicable in all locations and all climates. | |
| ▲ | kibwen 3 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Living in the countryside won't save you. I spent my childhood in a rural area and our house had the misfortune of being situated on a steep hill, so at all hours of the day and night you'd have cars and motorcycles and tractor trailers revving their engine to get up that hill. Every year we'd have to powerwash that road-facing side of the house to clean off the accumulated black grime, and sleeping with my window open, which faced that same road, always caused me to wake up raspy and hacking. Cars are a problem no matter where you live. |
| |
| ▲ | cucumber3732842 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not everywhere is LA. How much does implementing all that cost? What degree of benefit does it offer over simple window in situations where those concerns are negligible? What other benefits to human life could be procured with that money? It just boggles the mind that people feel emboldened to only look at one side of the equation. |
| |
| ▲ | weberer 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >The good news is that I stopped worrying about making my house "tight" for the sake of energy efficiency. I keep some windows cracked all year and don't worry about how tight the door seals are. You could also install an energy recovery ventilation (ERV) system. | |
| ▲ | tsss 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Your comment is suspiciously missing the part where your students performed measurably better after decreasing CO2 concentration. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | Tossrock 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Submarines operate in the 1000s of PPM CO2 range and the sailors aboard generally do not experience any ill effects. This was tested and no deficits were found even at 15,000 PPM: https://asma.kglmeridian.com/view/journals/amhp/89/6/article... |
| |
| ▲ | w-m 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I don't think you can cleanly compare this: In the study, they added CO2 to the room, while keeping O2 at normoxic levels throughout the experiment. In your meeting room, O2 levels will be dropping in lock-step with the CO2-levels rising. It may be the lack of oxygen that leads to drowsiness, not the additional CO2. But it's the CO2 levels that you can measure as a good proxy of overall air quality. | | |
| ▲ | KerrickStaley 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I don't think this is correct. The concentration of CO2 in air is about 0.04%, whereas the concentration of oxygen is 20%, so the partial pressure of oxygen is about 500x higher. This means that if, for example, 10% of the oxygen in a room spontaneously disappeared, it would be replaced about sqrt(500) = 22x faster through leaks in the room than a 10% spontaneous CO2 increase would dissipate. (This ignores a small effect due to the different density of the two gases). So in practice the oxygen level can never drift meaningfully far from the atmospheric pressure, whereas carbon dioxide easily can because the pressures involved are so low. | | |
| ▲ | w-m 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Ok, fair points, including the sister comment, it's likely not a drop in O2 levels. But then why can we see problems with concentration in studies of people in poorly ventilated rooms, but not replicate that when just adding CO2 to normal air? What is the CO2 that we can measure in meeting rooms actually a proxy for? | | |
| ▲ | tux3 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The Satish 2012 study that seems to have started this trend was a small cohort of 22 people split in 6 smaller groups where they also just injected pure CO2 in a small room. There have been several attempts to reproduce, which sometimes found no clear effect, or a significantly smaller effect. This original study has been used to market these CO2 monitors for years, but the evidence is quite thin and doesn't support a strong effect. It seems likely that there is a small effect, and it has been wildly exaggerated thanks to a small study with N=22. | | | |
| ▲ | halper 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Can it not just be that what happens in stuffy meeting rooms is boring? Opening the windows changes the temperature, the noise levels, perhaps the light levels ≈ adds some novelty, which makes you feel a bit more awake. |
|
| |
| ▲ | hahahaa 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | O2 is 200000ppm so if co2 goes up 400 to 2000ppm does o2 go down to 198400ppm? |
| |
| ▲ | Robin_Message 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If that study was of submariners, is it possible long-term high-level exposure causes the body to adapt? I am suspicious of 0.1% having a significant effect though, given oxygen is around 20% and we naturally exhale a couple of percent CO2. | | |
| ▲ | pishpash 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I mean that can't be right, as the body's breathing response is triggered by that amount of CO2 buildup. It's not about what's in the air. It's about what the body can take up. Maybe submariners are self-selected to be more physically fit, e.g. larger heart, lung capacity etc. to compensate. |
| |
| ▲ | brookst 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Though that study included a 45 minute acclimation period. Appropriate for submarines, but I wonder what the results would be in the first 1 / 5 / 10 minutes. | | | |
| ▲ | mppm an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | ... which is entirely unsurprising given that exhaled air is about 50.000 ppm CO2 and can vary by several 10.000s depending on depth and rate of breathing. I actually consider the recent wave of findings that CO2 levels as low as 500-1000 ppm measurably affect cognitive performance and well-being to be a great example of how you can prove literally anything with statistics and a sufficiently small sample size. | |
| ▲ | dev1ycan an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Submarineers also are hand picked due to their great lung capacity... | |
| ▲ | nok22kon 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | could be a selection effect at work | |
| ▲ | culturestate 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | One key difference is that submariners are rigorously trained to operate effectively in less-than-ideal environmental conditions, whereas Bob from accounting probably is not. |
|
|
| ▲ | chrisweekly 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I bought a $30 CO2 monitor a couple months ago, and it confirmed my suspicion that my home office (a normal room about 12' x 18') reaches unhealthy levels over 1000ppm after just a few hours; opening a window quickly restores levels to the 400-700ppm range.
Afternoon mental fatigue solved. Highly recommended. |
| |
| ▲ | abixb 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Fantastic, did you go for a particular "trusted" brand or just went on vibes? How should one rationally approach shopping for a CO2 monitor for home office use? |
|
|
| ▲ | bob1029 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've noticed that cooking with gas is easily the worst thing for CO2 levels. Even with lots of ventilation my kitchen will hover around 1200ppm until it's over with. I swear I can feel the 430ppm already. I was born into a world with 340ppm. I can't imagine what it's going to be like when we hit 500+ globally. I'm in the market for an active CO2 scrubbing solution that I could deploy at home. Scrubbing the entire planet won't work but I could make a small room feel like 1960 again. |
| |
|
| ▲ | microtonal 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Two tips: if you want a stationary CO2 meter in a room, you can make one very cheap with a SenseAir S88 sensor (22 Euro) and hooking it up to an ESP board. Flash ESPHome and you can get live statistics in your Home Assistant dashboard. The S88 is a pretty good optical NDIR Sensor that auto-calibrates by putting it in the outside air or in a well-ventilated room every N-days (N is in the data sheet). A bit more info about hooking up the S88: https://danieldk.eu/hardware/smart-home/esphome-senseair-s88 If you want something with a display that works on batteries without spending over 200 Euro for an AraNet, the SwitchBot Meter Pro CO2 is pretty good option. It is regularly on offer below 50 Euro. It uses photoacoustic NDIR, but does not deviate a lot from the S88. You can use it without a SwitchBot by configuring it with a phone on Bluetooth. The meter works on external power and battery, but even when on battery, you can set the reporting interval to 5 minutes, which is good enough in practice. The meter broadcasts the measurements with Bluetooth LE, so if you want to get the data in Home Assistant, you can place a ESPHome Bluetooth LE Proxy in the vicinity [1]. This is an ESP32 flashed with ESPHome that listens on Bluetooth LE advertisement and forwards them to your HA instance over WiFi. Of course, you could also get the SwitchBot Hub, but what is the fun in doing that? :) I would avoid the Ikea ALPSTUGA, it uses a thermal conductivity sensor, which is a very indirect method for measurements and it's often several hundred ppm off. https://esphome.io/components/bluetooth_proxy/ |
| |
| ▲ | bjackman 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | As a middle ground I can also recommend this unit: https://apolloautomation.com/products/air-1 Looks like it's increased in price unfortunately but I like the idea, it's basically just what you would do as a DIY project but ready built. So you can either use it like a normal commercial product, or you can just fork the ESPHome config that's on GitHub and flash it exactly like any normal ESPHome project. | | | |
| ▲ | dgellow 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Thanks for mentioning that, last week I got 2 SwitchBot hub mini, 3 temperature sensors each, for 70€ total, they are really neat. Even put one in our fridge, I didn’t expect the signal to pass but it’s working :) Will look at adding the CO2 monitoring Edit: actually, they only sell them as part of a 6-in-1 device, with a display, and a bunch of other sensors. That feels overkill, I wish they would just sell the CO2 sensor itself |
|
|
| ▲ | kashishgrover 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Oh this is absolutely so relevant and I wonder if there are any high quality studies that have analyzed driving performance against CO2 buildup in cars. Cars often ship with circulate air feature in the aircon, and people use it aggressively, nonchalantly at least where I live, having no idea about the dangers of possible hypoxia and sleepiness that might be inducing in them while driving. It is absolutely critical in my opinion for cars to have CO2 monitors. We put so many sensors in cars these days that this seems to be a really cheap and fairly high value of life addition that could possibly prevent accidents on roads. I keep a portable CO2 sensor in my car at all times, because sometimes circulation is not something I can avoid when stuck in traffic or when passing by a drain. |
| |
| ▲ | npunt 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Got a firsthand experience with this. I was dropping off my girlfriend and we stopped to talk in the car, with all the windows up. Over the course of the conversation we got more and more agitated at each other until I had a thought and pulled my Aranet out from my backpack. It was >3000ppm CO2. We opened windows and within 2 minutes all the agitation went away. | | |
| ▲ | hypfer 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | To be fair, that might not just have been the CO2 dropping, but also the pattern interrupt + giving you both an easy and face-saving way out of that situation. | |
| ▲ | the_gipsy 31 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Or, you became aware of the agitation and interrupted it. The CO2 was a placebo. You have invested already in the idea, it all clicked in your mind. | | |
| ▲ | mbo 15 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I'm not sure this is a helpful comment. This is a common story with many medications, where someone notices their feelings are off and suddenly remembers that there is a probable root cause. It's why medications list side effects. |
|
| |
| ▲ | prodigycorp 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Your comment actually has me convinced that this isn't an issue. I've been a recirculation dude for my entire life, I literally don't drive any other way. | |
| ▲ | inigyou 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Buildup of CO2 and reduction in O2 are two different effects. We're not in danger of running out of O2 in any everyday situation. | |
| ▲ | _thisdot 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Relevant video of someone experimenting with a CO2 monitor in a car: https://youtu.be/hr9w-ZixAqc | |
| ▲ | infofarmer 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah, I measured over 5000ppm in a taxi with two passengers. Showed the driver how to enable air intake (he didn’t know about the feature) and tried to explain this is deadly. Pretty sure this is commonplace globally. Generally it’s a miracle to me so many people survive traffic on public roads, statistically. | |
| ▲ | ErroneousBosh 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Cars are not sufficiently sealed for that to make any kind of a difference. | | | |
| ▲ | esikich 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Cars aren't hermetically sealed vessel. This is hilarious. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | oasisbob 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There needs to be a meter for the amount of AI writing in blogposts. Same physics, same climb, same afternoon fog. |
| |
| ▲ | salahadawi 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I've actually been tracking the front page of HN for AI posts for a while now:
https://www.salahadawi.com/hacker-news-ai-detector This post evaluates to 99% AI generated. | |
| ▲ | naet 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This reads to me as AI generated. Apparently it's still good enough to the general audience to be the #1 post on HN right now though. Which is honestly a troubling signal for the state of the world... | |
| ▲ | stavros 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, it's really tiring reading Claude's output all day, every day. Nowadays I yearn for a different style. |
|
|
| ▲ | smooc 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I do feel impaired around 1000ppm. I get headaches. At home I got a few Air Gradient Ones (no affiliation, but they are great) and connected those to my Home Assistant to turn up the ventilation in stages (above 650ppm go up, above 800ppm again, at 1000ppm max). I also do this for the bedrooms, cause in the night it goes up too. The article talks about "within the hour". With four people in my living room doing normal things it jumps within 20min to around 1000ppm. If I am wrestling with my kids much sooner. In offices companies often neglect it. edit: if you are cooking on gas it also has an immediate effect on co2 of course apart from other small particles |
|
| ▲ | teiferer an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That article's message is spot on. If your CO2 levels are that high then you should fix the HVAC system and get it up to code or lobby for fixing the code. In many countries, a full air exchange in any office space every X hours is mandatory. In other countries that's optional and they need to get their act together. |
| |
| ▲ | mort96 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | In most of the world outside of the US, having "an HVAC system" is extremely rare. | |
| ▲ | throwaway27448 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Or just open the window for the world that doesn't have HVAC |
|
|
| ▲ | throwaway81523 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Don't forget too, if the CO2 is 1000 ppm, then half of the air in each breath you inhale was recently exhaled by someone else. Yes, airborne viruses are still spreading. I still wear an N95 mask whenever I'm in an indoor space with other people outside of home. IKEA now has a remarkably cheap ($35) air quality monitor that measures CO2 as well as PM: https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/alpstuga-air-quality-sensor-sma... I don't have one yet but plan to pick one up soon. A CO2 sensor alone from Adafruit is $50+, though that one is more precise. I bought it a while ago and it's still sitting in my todo bin. |
| |
| ▲ | bebe9494i4 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I do not give a damm about masks, but yet another reason to prefer work from home. Flu and other air transmited diseases should be treated as a workplace injury, with proper compensation! | | |
| ▲ | inigyou 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Would that not induce a responsibility to take reasonable preventative measures like wearing masks? | | |
| ▲ | bebe9494i4 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Maybe, but masks do not work. You have to replace it every 30 minutes to preserve filtering capabilities
And most germs transfer over touch. I want this implemented to fullest, preferably with full hazmat suit. Yet more reasons to support work from home. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | hypfer 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Doing that all the time might not be the best idea for your immune system and neither for the respiratory one too. The first needs to occasionally see new threats to stay up to date and healthy. The second will not like the constantly restricted airflow. | |
| ▲ | boernard 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | could you observe an effect on your health after starting to wear the mask? like sickness days per year? |
|
|
| ▲ | Aperocky 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This article is rated 100% on my AI smell meter, making it less trustworthy despite convincing arguments. For instance, I'm now really only sure that author measured a 2000 ppm CO2 in a meeting room once. Everything else could just be LLM trying to invent convincing argument. |
| |
| ▲ | girvo 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Glad someone else is saying it. It has that exact LLM cadence to it, horrible. The worst thing is, I'm pretty sure humans are starting to mimic that cadence too... |
|
|
| ▲ | gwd 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I noticed this effect really strongly at university. There was one particular lecture hall that was effectively buried in the side of a hill; I can't count how many times I had an early afternoon lecture in there (so it had been in use since 8am), where I just could not focus or stay awake. Assuming sleep deprivation was the problem, afterwards I'd head out and lie down on a bench to take a nap, only to find myself wide awake. I have no trouble taking cat-naps when I'm actually tired, leading me to eventually conclude it was CO2 / O2 in the room that was the culprit. |
|
| ▲ | machined_gray 33 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Get a sensor with NDIR system and it should be good. I myself have felt cognitive functions decline during my remote work sessions at home. I have smaller room that gets filled with CO2 when my family visit the room. Comprehensive AIR monitor system is must to get most efficient output. Author is right here! |
|
| ▲ | hanspagel 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Not gonna happen in Germany. I don’t think I‘ve ever seen a windowless room here and it’s common to open all windows at once for a few minutes, just to replace as much air as possible: Stoßlüften. |
| |
| ▲ | em-bee 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | when i read the article i thought that maybe this is where german ingenuity comes from. but then germany hasn't been doing so well lately, and people who do most of their work outside should also be doing better... |
|
|
| ▲ | jumploops 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Indoor air quality improvements were one of my “pandemic sourdough” activities. After testing a variety of AQI sensors, I ended up acquiring multiple Airthings-branded devices. They provided the best mix of CO2/VOCs/PM sensors in a single device with a decent enough app. There may be better options now, but I have these at both home and office. Highly recommend doing the research and learning about the environments you’re in, especially if you have little ones at home. Edit to add: opening windows is usually the easiest/best solution! |
|
| ▲ | rikschennink 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| “That number matters more than it looks.”, then the next paragraph starts with “Here is the uncomfortable part”, and then I closed the tab. |
|
| ▲ | ncrmro an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| At a career fair in an auditorium I was showing a sensor suite with OLED displaying current readings, one of which was the SCD41 CO2 sensor (they cost more than the esp32!) I watched the sensor rise from 800 to 1700 PPM by the time the last group left the It’s quite easy to build one and deploy with esphome and breadboard with stuff you can order on Amazon and have an LLM walk your through hardware and setup. It is interesting where the rate of speech quickens as the co2 rises and the body starts to notice the co2, or maybe that was just the coffee. |
|
| ▲ | sixtyj 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A lot of CO2 is bad for thinking. CO2 is just a tip as office or home is toxic environment anyway. Plastic (e.g. carpets), formaldehyde in furniture, air fresheners… add home office and cooking at home (-> small carcinogenic particles)… If you start reading How not to die by Michael Greger, you find out that dust, soda and sitting - not CO2 - are real killers… It's similar to how people think sharks and airplanes are the biggest killers - when in reality it is coconuts, mosquitoes, and motorcycles. |
| |
| ▲ | bebe9494i4 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My previous employer had dogs shit on carpets, without proper desinfection! Just smearing excrements into carpet, waiting for it to dry out, so it can go airborne! | |
| ▲ | _def 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | How do you avoid/reduce exposure to dust? Genuine question | | |
| ▲ | Dove 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Air filters, decluttering, regular deep cleaning, replacing dust-friendly surfaces and furniture (such as carpet, drapes, and upholstered sofas) with things like wood, vinyl, or leather. HVAC maintenance, cleaning, and filters. Washable allergen covers for things like pillows and mattresses. | |
| ▲ | hobofan 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | HEPA-filter air purifier and a robot vacuum that is scheduled to run while your are not in the apartment (to reduce baseline dust) are probably the most simple/cost-effective measures. | |
| ▲ | throw-the-towel 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Use an air purifier, wear a respirator outside if you live in a polluted place. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Air purifier is good for PM2.5 and other microscopic pollutants but it doesn’t do that much for dust unless it’s particularly light dust and very close to the purifier. Dust is much more likely to just settle on the ground and be kicked back up than it is to move all the way to the purifier to get stuck in the filter. | | |
| ▲ | mrob 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I have an air purifier with built in particulate sensor. It doesn't provide numbers, but has a multi-color LED indicator to report PM2.5 level as good/mediocre/bad/terrible. Running a vacuum cleaner that supposedly has a good filter consistently increases the reported PM2.5 level from the first band to the second. The air purifier (or faster/cheaper depending on the weather, just open some windows) can bring it back down again. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | xg15 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A bit OT, but was anyone else amazed by the bad UX of that CO2 monitor in the picture? If you notice, that monitor has a "traffic light" gauge at the bottom to tell you if the current CO2 level is critical. That traffic light is currently showing RED, i.e. highly critical. The thing is essentially sounding the alarm and prompting immediate action. However, became the traffic light colors are printed on and static and the only dynamic indicator is a small e-paper bit above the color gauge, the effect gets lost completely. |
| |
| ▲ | layer8 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | These CO2 monitors have a configurable audio alarm. The present model uses an e-ink display to conserve battery. Physical LEDs would also work, but really in practice you don’t look at the unit and instead are notified by the audio alarm. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | alienbaby an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Working from home next to my open window feels generally way better then being in the office. Perhaps this is contributing. Still, seems more of a case for WFH rather than against, as article mentions some people have tried to make the case for. |
|
| ▲ | eitau_1 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Can someone provide an explanation why CO2 concentrations above 1000 ppm have such a negative influence given the fact that CO2 concentration in lungs (at rest) never falls below 10000 ppm? |
| |
| ▲ | fer 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It simply makes the baseline higher. If you want to go to extreme cases, check carbogen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbogen | |
| ▲ | Terr_ 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm not a doctor, but I would consider it in terms of flow and throughput, rather than,—metaphorically—the amount of water the pipe can hold. | | |
| ▲ | eitau_1 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Per Wikipedia, at rest 500 ml of inhaled air is diluted with ≥2500 ml [1] of residual air in lungs containing ≥40000 ppm (4%) of CO2 [2]. Other things being equal, increasing concentration of CO2 in ambient air 10x (500ppm -> 5000 ppm) would increase concentration of CO2 in the lungs after taking the breath by less than 2.5% [3]. I imagine it could easily be compensated by an equivalently minor increase of breathing rate or breathing depth. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_exchange#Alveolar_air [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breathing#Composition [3] 5/6 × 40000 ppm + 1/6 × 500 ppm = 33417 ppm; 5/6 × 40000 ppm + 1/6 × 5000 ppm = 34167 ppm; 34167 / 33417 = 1.0225 |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Beijinger an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Ugo Bardi has an interesting take on CO2 and intelligence: https://senecaeffect.substack.com/p/a-new-interpretation-of-... |
|
| ▲ | sohpea 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A reasonably popular brand's product that uses an NDIR sensor revealed to me just how much the CO2 level increases each night in my two bedrooms. One of them seems to have much worse ventilation to the extent that it reaches double the level. Opening the window slightly 24/7 keeps it low. My fiance's chronic headaches/migraines/idk became noticeably less frequent after this change and when they do occur it's usually because the window was accidentally left closed. Anybody who struggles with this kind of thing might want to try checking their levels. Or just open a window I guess? |
|
| ▲ | _def 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Then, somewhere in the second hour, the room quietly gets worse at making them. Maybe it's not just the air but also the multi-hour meetings that drive people to a sense of "oh god let this finally end now", which leads do decisions that fall short. |
|
| ▲ | red75prime 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Does it work the other way around? Does breathing air with 0% CO2 improve human cognitive performance? I haven't been able to find any research on the effects of lower CO2 concentrations. |
|
| ▲ | abalashov an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As a cyclist, I've heard a similar argument for years about indoor training, and particularly doing difficult indoor intervals beyond FTP. |
|
| ▲ | nenadg 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| At some point I worked with a team of ~10 people, and we did sprint plannings in 20sq meters room from 10am to 5pm. It was like everyone was high |
|
| ▲ | carterschonwald 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| i literally had a co2 sensor for my engineering team last fall cause the space was so poorly ventilated. just measuring it continuously radically changed how everyone approached using the space packing wise and ventilation. smelled better too :p |
|
| ▲ | Yajirobe 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I have a CO2 monitor and I don't understand one thing - it seems that CO2 increases more quickly during summer than during winter. If I close my windows it takes longer to reach 1000 ppm during winter than it does during the summer. I didn't gather concrete data on this but this is just what I eyeballed over the last few years. Does anyone know why could this be the case? |
| |
|
| ▲ | bambax 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Open a window. In most office buildings (towers) that's impossible. You have to deal with what the A/C gives you. |
|
| ▲ | zerop 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I tend to agree with this observation. I started taking my evening calls (6:30 to 10:30 PM everyday) from my terrace in open air and my overall fatigue became quite less and I feel quite less tired compared to earlier time when I used to take these calls from my room. |
|
| ▲ | zh3 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| For the DIYers, it's simple to get an SCD4x sensor and hook it to a pi, arduino, ESP32 etc (then use CC to create a live web interface). I did this after trying an Inkbird CO2 monitor, which gets reasonable scores in reviews and wanting a live web report in the office. Interestingly the Inkbird and the SCD4X quite often diverge by anything up to hundreds of PPMs; I kind of back the SCD4x (on a Pi in my case) for accuracy after lots of experimentation, reading the datasheet and ensuring the correct calibration procedurs are followed (basically expose the sensors to outside air once a week). It's also interesting how much it varies day to day in my one-person office - possibly down to how windy it is outside, even with windows closed one day it never goes about 800ppm, other days it'll hit 1500ppm by lunchtime if I don't open a window. N.B. Quite possible the Inkbird uses an SCD4x internally, seems reasonable kit so I have no explanation for the differences in readings. |
| |
|
| ▲ | layer8 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My employer started using CO2 monitors in meeting rooms 15 years ago, it’s really a useful thing to have. As well as the meeting rooms having windows you can open. |
|
| ▲ | doginasuit 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I find it kind of funny that we've been low-key suffocating the higher order function of our brains ever since we started building structures to live in with very little awareness of it. My mom is one of those people who complains that the air is getting stale and opens a window, the hero we needed. |
| |
| ▲ | jeromechoo an hour ago | parent [-] | | Not that we need more anecdotal evidence but I’ve long felt a certain restlessness and inability to think creatively somewhere in the early afternoon. I work from home with my wife. I’ve eliminated lunch, coffee, and a ton of other variables. The one variable that finally had a distinct effect to my mental state was opening a window. |
|
|
| ▲ | lexoj 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I remember some years ago after coming from work at 6 pm I was dead tired at home thinking it was due to hard work during the day. Then one summer day decided to code side projects on my balcony and I was building until midnight full of energy. |
|
| ▲ | materialpoint 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Goes a long way to prove that industrial air conditioning is absolutely abysmal. If air conditioning actually worked satisfactorily, opening a window should never be necessary unless you want the cold waft of air, while the air conditioning actually delivered high-quality, low-CO2 air without smell.
Instead any room at > 20% capacity is quickly filled with CO2 and the putrid smell of bad mouth and body odour.
I get it that perfect ventilation would be way more expensive, but at the current level it is just bad, and the windows are sealed shut. It does not make sense from a human perspective. |
|
| ▲ | SunboX 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Great article! I did build a open source one years ago: https://andrefiedler.de/open-source-co2-ampel/ It's on my desk and I can confirm, opening the window if it gets orange helps a lot with thinking. Some days in the morning it shows red and I barely can't think or get awake. Opening the window and it changes instantly. |
|
| ▲ | scrollop an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Interesting. Perhaps using non-ozone negative ionizers would also help. |
|
| ▲ | teekert 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I also use my Aranet everywhere. The nice thing is you quickly develop a feel for when you need to ventilate spaces you know so you don’t need it there anymore. I also developed a feeling for new (to me) rooms a bit. I once woke up with the fam in a hotel with airco at 5500 ppm. It is then that I learned the airco does not blow fresh air (logical after thinking about it). |
|
| ▲ | clbrmbr an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Matches my experience. Basement home offices are the worst offenders. |
|
| ▲ | ccozan 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I wonder if the corona times trend to WFH and jump to Teams/Zoom/etc meetings instead of physical meetings had/has a positive effect in regards to this. |
|
| ▲ | joshuaS98 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why did your startup fail? The CO2 was sitting at 1.000 ppm |
|
| ▲ | skrebbel 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I wonder how many high impact political decisions (eg EU treaties) have been made in rooms like these. |
|
| ▲ | jickmao 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The practical bottleneck for most AI tooling isn't model capability anymore - it's the orchestration layer. Getting reliable behavior across edge cases requires more engineering than people expect from demos. |
| |
|
| ▲ | JoshTriplett 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| One easy way to fix this for many people's bedrooms or home offices: look at your HVAC system, and there's probably an option to have the fan run all the time, even if the heat or air isn't running. Turn that on, and your home's CO2 levels will drop substantially. |
|
| ▲ | TonyAlicea10 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Topic must be very interesting to have this much discussion on an obviously AI-written article. I couldn’t get past the first few sentences. |
|
| ▲ | Retr0id 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| LLM prose really sucks the air out of a room. |
|
| ▲ | londons_explore 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Are there studies which analyze performance Vs artificial CO2? Natural CO2 in a room probably correlates strongly with other things given off by humans... Farts, water vapour, viruses, etc. The effect needs to be properly understood before totally redesigning the nations ventilation systems on a possibly wrong premise. |
| |
| ▲ | irdc an hour ago | parent [-] | | There are. The article literally cites a publication describing just such a study. |
|
|
| ▲ | Mistletoe 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The really uncomfortable part is that 1000 ppm isn’t that far off from how EARTH will be. A terrifying scenario that will be like Total Recall with people clamoring for and paying for fresh air. Those that can’t will be permanently in a stupor. https://science.nasa.gov/earth/explore/earth-indicators/carb... |
|
| ▲ | a1371 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The building science community has not buy and large came to the agreement that the CO2 itself is the cause of the cognitive decline. It could be the Canary in the coal mine telling us there is an accumulation of compounds causing the decline. Why that matters? You need good ventilation regardless, but instead of just thinking of CO2, try to minimize compounds in your air by selecting things for the room that smell less and off-gas less. |
|
| ▲ | vasco 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Similar to this a closed motorcycle helmet without air circulation increases CO2 extremely rapidly, within 60s it's already at really high levels. Open your visor when you stop! |
|
| ▲ | lloydatkinson 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I can feel the AI in the text. |
| |
| ▲ | netsharc 40 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, I noticed it at "Here is the uncomfortable part. 1,000 ppm is not an extreme number." Either AI, or LinkedIn brainrot. |
|
|
| ▲ | ck2 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| if price is no object get the AirGradient PM2.5+CO2 but Ikea now makes the most affordable PM2.5+CO2 sensor, at $35 a no-brainer https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/alpstuga-air-quality-sensor-sma... in there is a very nice/expensive Sensirion SN63C sensor that costs nearly as much as the Ikea itself https://sensirion.com/company/news/press-releases-and-news/a... unfortunately Ikea requires Matter network not plain wifi for communication so I've been looking for a cheap Matter hub or DIY SPR |
|
| ▲ | tsss 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You know what also impacts my decision making ability? Freezing my ass off because people are opening all the windows every five minutes. |
|
| ▲ | jwpapi 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Buying one of these gadgets killed my brain fog |
|
| ▲ | lofaszvanitt 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Wow, what a revelation. People rediscover basic things in life :D. |
|
| ▲ | swe_dima 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| if I travel and expect to be working I now bring a CO2 meter |
|
| ▲ | 217 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| i love seeing things i saw on twitter two years ago at the front page of hn man like what are we doing |
|
| ▲ | Scroll_Swe 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I am able to open the windows at home and at work but have to be reminded to air out, but I always feel much clearer when I do. Also, take walks. I am lucky to be able to walk to and from work and it helps immensely. |
|
| ▲ | fractallyte 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Aranet detectors are superb, and – best of all! – made in Latvia. Support European! https://aranet.com/en/home |
|
| ▲ | marouen19 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Just open the door |
|
| ▲ | metalman 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| open a window, wait, ok, ok, turn up the , wait, no, ummm, hmmmmm
re, re, no forget that, hmmm
anyway, as a person with a strong interest in civil engineering, systems, and the subset of air handling, I can say that there has long been disenting arguments about how things are built,that have been ignored due to cost, which are large in terms of internal volumes required, and the intractable issues around, noise, filtration, heating/cooling and maintenance.
And as the climate warms, and in many areas pollution increases , the inadequate methods used to "calculate" requirements, get further from real world needs.
You could try throwing a desk through a window, but as that is one of the things the planners and engineers have antisipated, it will prove to be surprisingly difficult. |
|
| ▲ | keiferski 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yet another reason to have meetings while walking outside: air quality and a natural limit on time, and the mental benefits that come from movement. |
| |
| ▲ | sapiogram 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Requires an area around your office that isn't ugly or overrun with cars. | | | |
| ▲ | gostsamo 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | requires that everyone is comfortable walking and has no physical impairments. Not to talk about the weather either. |
|
|
| ▲ | kennywinker 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > You gather your most expensive people into a room to make your most important decisions. A terrible way to make decisions. |
| |
| ▲ | sixtyj 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | What should be a better way? | | |
| ▲ | hahahaa 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Make them mostly async, bringly only the very pointy details that need nutting down sync. If knowledge transfer is needed in a meeting that could be done seperately. Put it this way do you need to book a 3h meeting with your spouse to decide if to buy a house? Nope all the research and decision criteria were in advance. That final minute of making the decision is a cross check over that work. |
|
|