This article is rated 100% on my AI smell meter, making it less trustworthy despite convincing arguments.

For instance, I'm now really only sure that author measured a 2000 ppm CO2 in a meeting room once. Everything else could just be LLM trying to invent convincing argument.

Glad someone else is saying it. It has that exact LLM cadence to it, horrible.

The worst thing is, I'm pretty sure humans are starting to mimic that cadence too...