| ▲ | 101008 10 hours ago |
| I know the author mentioned this, but I just got nervous imagining this as a tourist who doesn't speak German at all. This shouldn't be like this. Why they don't help at all? It's also funny considering how here in South America we look at Germany trains (and Switzerland trains) as always on time, and the best train system, etc. But I am sure if this happens here it would be on the cover of newspapers. |
|
| ▲ | microtonal 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's also funny considering how here in South America we look at Germany trains (and Switzerland trains) That's very outdated, DB has been terrible for a long time though. Switzerland is still the best though. Here are some stats for 2025: https://chuuchuu.com/2025wrapped Since you have to scroll down quite a bit to get the list of most reliable European trains (with percentage on time): 1. Switzerland 97.8% 2. The Netherlands 93.9% 3. Belgium 88.6% 4. Austria 82.2% 5. France 79.7% 6. Italy 62.0% 7. Germany 58.5% (Not sure why these are the only countries in the list.) |
| |
| ▲ | foxrider 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | After living in Italy for a few years - if you're doing worse than Italy with your train schedule it's time to reflect hard. | | |
| ▲ | apexalpha 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Germany and Italy should gang up together to make the trains run on time and... wait a minute. |
| |
| ▲ | creichenbach 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As per my other comment, Swiss trains (especially SBB) are not as pleasant as they get credit for. I get a lot that "you know, in other countries it's much worse", and it reminds me of software hosting, where it was normal in the past to be offline occasionally. Then Google et al. came and showed that much more reliability is possible with good engineering. I think there would be a lot of room for improvement. | | |
| ▲ | mcv 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I disagree. Swiss trains are a delight. They even have trains going up mountains (although some of those cost extra). Public transit in Switzerland was extremely reliable when I was there, and also according to official statistics. | |
| ▲ | gregorygoc 40 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Complaining about Swiss trains is beyond me. |
| |
| ▲ | nikeee 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Keep in mind that a train in Germany counts as one-time if it is less than 6 minutes late. In Switzerland, it's 3 minutes. Also in Germany, a train that did not even arrive does not count as too late. There is also a concept of the "Pofalla-Wende", which is when a train is so late that it just does a 180 and drives back, to mitigate that the delay doesn't carry over to the train's next route. Of course, that means that it skips the stations at the end of the route. | |
| ▲ | flr03 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That does not make Germany look any better but I find the "percentage on time" not very useful compared to the "years of delay" metric. And arguable a average/median delay per train would be better? Also some delay volatility data would be interesting. If you look at France for example, 80% of trains are not punctual but the "total delays" is actually on the low range, France being on the large side with lots of lines, I would say that it shows that the delays (20% of the time) are actual shorts. | |
| ▲ | dddddaviddddd 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Canada: 30% on-time https://media.viarail.ca/en/press-releases/2025/q1-2025-time... | |
| ▲ | ragall 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I gather that this is an average of all trains. In Italy, the high velocity train are quite punctual, but the slow regional trains drag the average down. | |
| ▲ | jansan 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In Germany in 2025 it got worse with only 55% of trains being on time (defined very generously as being less than 6 minutes late). | | |
| ▲ | mcv 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I find this figure absolutely baffling. How can you run a train system with half of all trains being late? | | |
| ▲ | apexalpha 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Someone has never been outside the Western world, lol. In many countries the train comes when it comes and goes when it can, regardless of any fictional like schedules. | | |
| ▲ | alexfoo 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | (Hence the occasionally heard witty announcement in the UK…) “Please mind the gap between the timetable and reality.” | |
| ▲ | mcv 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I have. Mali didn't have trains at all. Our Indonesian train was on time. It's not like countries outside Europe can't make trains run on time. Japan's are even more punctual than Switzerland's. |
| |
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
| |
| ▲ | nperson 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The less complex your train network, the easier it is to ensure trains are on time. France, Italy and Germany possibly have larger networks than Switzerland. | | |
| ▲ | mcv 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Then split your network into segments you can handle. Switzerland receives lots of international trains. Not only that; it has a lot of rail companies, serves even tiny villages, and has the highest use per capita in Europe. Size of the network is a lame excuse. German trains used to be fine. Now they're a disaster. | |
| ▲ | ExoticPearTree 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Switzerland has all public transport synchronized across the country. In any of the countries you mentioned they don’t even gave synchronized public transport at city level. | |
| ▲ | izacus 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | No, Swiss SBB is just generally very competent and has insane amount of traffic in comparison to any European rail. | |
| ▲ | krior 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The swiss have a more challenging geography and weather than Germany. They also spend far more per capita on their train system. All that and afaik they still manage to connect all important places. | |
| ▲ | microtonal 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Except that The Netherlands has the busiest rail network in Europe [1] and still manages to be second in that list. [1] https://www.acm.nl/en/publications/acm-rail-monitor-netherla... |
| |
| ▲ | raverbashing 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Talk about a very appropriate domain name lol |
|
|
| ▲ | flexagoon 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I recently moved to the Netherlands to study, and I experience that a lot. Despite almost all official information everywhere being written in both Dutch and English, in-train announcements are only done in Dutch. I have to constantly listen to the announcements and try to understand based off their vibe if they sound like something critical or not. |
| |
| ▲ | nephihaha 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Dutch announcements in the Netherlands. Fancy that. Almost like it's the national language or something. | | |
| ▲ | tzs 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | The Netherlands is in the EU. English is the most widely spoken language in the EU, even after the UK left, because it is by far the most common second language. Nearly half of the people in the EU can speak it. In Northern Europe the percentage is even higher. In the Netherlands there are almost as many people who speak it as there are Dutch speakers. Taking into account people from other EU countries who are there on business plus tourists there is a good chance that if only one language was to be used for train announcements more people on the train would understand if it was in English then if it was in Dutch. | | |
| ▲ | nephihaha 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is imperial mentality. Dutch is the language of the Netherlands not English and they have the right to use it. If we follow your line Dutch will go the same way as Welsh or Basque. | | | |
| ▲ | trvz 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Ideally announcements should be bilingual, but if there’s only one language, it’s better to inconvenience any number of foreigners than even a single native who doesn’t speak English. | |
| ▲ | prmoustache 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Thanksfully, dutch is reasonnably easy to understand (not to speak) if you know english and the actual context. Or maybe that is just me having grown to understand dutch and flemish as a cyclocross rider and spectator. |
|
| |
| ▲ | derfniw 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yep, only semi-consistent exception is that Amsterdam Central & Schiphol are usually also announced in english. Including delays related to these stations. But, for example, Rotterdam or Utrecht are already a lot less likely to be announced in english. | | |
| ▲ | mcv 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I was once in a train that announced Schiphol in 5 languages. That's how you announce an international airport. |
| |
| ▲ | integralid 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Since you moved to Netherlands is understandable they speak Dutch. You should consider learning it off you want to get by in the society. |
|
|
| ▲ | mosura 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| German trains, as recently as the 90s, were phenomenal, and integrated superbly with the Swiss and others. It is in the 21st century that Germany has gone off the rails. |
| |
| ▲ | matrss 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | In other words: it's going downhill ever since the DB was privatized. | | |
| ▲ | Zufriedenheit 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | DB is not privatized. It is 100% owned by the state. | | |
| ▲ | matrss 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | DB has been reorganized as an AG in the 90s, i.e. a corporation under private law. They are forced to (at least try to) make a profit for their shareholders, which is a common trait of private organizations. They consistently do so via short-sighted (mis-)management, another common trait with many private organizations. This privatized corporation is indeed fully owned by the state as its only shareholder, but unfortunately that doesn't manifest in the DB being run as the critical infrastructure that it is. I suspect that the indirections in power over the corporation that the privatized structure imposes is a key reason for why it became such a disaster. | | |
| ▲ | apexalpha 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > They are forced to (at least try to) make a profit for their shareholders, This is not true at all. The shareholders set the targets and since the shareholder is the government they can set any target they want: profitability, more trains, cheaper tickets etc.. If the shareholder wants to inject 10% every year in stead of taking a profit they are absolutely free to do so. | | |
| ▲ | matrss 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The DB AG has been specifically founded to be "market-oriented" and profit-making, so yes, it is true. I am sure the state could try to do _something_ about it, but I am also sure that a very strong car lobby here in Germany is working against that. BTW, the road network, which I would consider to conceptually be the same kind of infrastructure as the rail network, is to my understanding mostly built and maintained by state organizations, so it is possible to do it that way. I guess it is also harder to market "let's subsidize this private company with tax payer money so they can continue to offer mediocre service" to voters, compared to "let's use tax payer money to build and maintain one-of-a-kind critical infrastructure from which everyone (with a car, which due to the less-than-great alternatives is a lot of people) can profit". Again, having it organized as a private company adds indirection, diffuses power and responsibility, and adds a certain more or less implicit expectation of what private companies are supposed to do. That's my main issue with it. Private companies aren't supposed to run critical infrastructure as a monopoly for profit. It's the states job to provide and maintain critical infrastructure in the interest of all. | | |
| ▲ | apexalpha 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | >The DB AG has been specifically founded to be "market-oriented" and profit-making, so yes, it is true. Again, if the shareholders decide this is the reason: yes. But shareholders can just as easily set other targets or incentives. >I guess it is also harder to market "let's subsidize this private company with tax payer money so they can continue to offer mediocre service" to voters, The government owns DB AG, it is not a private company. It is a public company. | | |
| ▲ | matrss 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > The government owns DB AG, it is not a private company. It is a public company. It is a private company, as in it is a legal entity under private law. This is in contrast to a "öffentlich-rechtliches Unternehmen" (I don't know if this even has a proper translation or equivalent in other jurisdictions). There is more than two options here, it can be both privatized and public according to your definition. |
|
| |
| ▲ | garbagewoman 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Do you know that the government has set those targets? |
| |
| ▲ | smcl 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I wonder how many times a low-effort "truthy" sounding comment like that is written without someone like you to correct them and to clarify. There's also comments here suggesting UK's privatisation fixed BR that I do not have the energy to correct anymore, so they just sit there being wrong for all to see | | |
| ▲ | arcfour 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Is their comment true because you want it to be, or is it actually factually inaccurate and biased as many other people are saying? |
| |
| ▲ | ernst_klim 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That's ridiculous. DB is not even trying to become profitable, not is there any evidence that it's sole shareholder, aka the government, sets it as a target. | | |
| ▲ | matrss 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well apparently they have been somewhat profitable from 2016 to 2019, and they have been paying a dividend to the state more often than not. I don't think their goal is actively loosing money? |
| |
| ▲ | thesimon 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > They are forced to (at least try to) make a profit for their shareholders [...] Not true. Shareholder primacy is not as huge as in Delaware. And in the end it's the government that owns all shares and thus can decide how much profit the company should make. | | |
| ▲ | matrss 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Just because it is even more true elsewhere does not mean it is untrue here. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | mnmalst 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | "Off the rails" hehe | |
| ▲ | YorickPeterse 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The Netherlands has a very similar problem: the train system was privatized in the late 90s/early 2000s and has been going downhill since the 2010s or so. While it's still better than Deutsche Bahn, it's just so much worse compared to how it used to be. | | |
| ▲ | apexalpha 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The Dutch train system is not privatised, the government owns 100% of both the tracks and the main carrier: the NS. | | | |
| ▲ | mcv 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Dutch trains aren't as perfect as the Swiss, but still far, far, better than German trains. I think it was about 20 years ago when NS was ridiculed because of nonsense delays caused by leaves on the track (who would possibly expect that in the autumn?). I think they're better now. And intercity trains leaving every 10 minutes (between Amsterdam and Utrecht) helps a lot. |
| |
| ▲ | nephihaha 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | German trains were great twenty years ago. I wouldn't be surprised if things went haywire after lockdown. Many things did. It gave people a licence not to work and introduced a sloppiness into everything. | | |
| ▲ | Deukhoofd 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm fairly certain it was before that, as someone living in The Netherlands we'd always get warned to make sure there was at least 30-60 minute transit time between each stop in Germany when travelling international, as the expectation was that the train would be (extremely) late. This was already the case around 2015. | |
| ▲ | CaptainZapp 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Trains are still great. Especially the newer generation ICEs are beautiful trains and very comfortable. Just don't count on them that they bring you to your destination in a timely manner. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | CaptainZapp 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > we look at Germany trains (and Switzerland trains) as always on time When taking an international train from Germany to Switzerland, don't count on it that it will run through to the final destination. SBB (Swiss National Railways) started to block German trains if their delay is more than 15 minutes (so, basically every DB train) and won't allow the train on their network. This is only peripherically educational. Constantly delayed DB trains completely fouled up the scheduling on the extremely dense Swiss network. So they just won't allow it anymore. On a sidenote: In 2024 SBB trains were 93.2% punctual. Connectivity punctuality (where you have to catch a connecting train) was 98.7%. A train is counted as punctual if the delay is less than 3 minutes (half the German figure). |
|
| ▲ | junon 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| German trains do typically announce in English. If they don't, that's the exception. Just ask around. Most people here speak English and will be able to repeat what was said, especially if they're under 40 or so. |
| |
| ▲ | reddalo 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Most people here speak English Germany is the country where I found the highest number of people not being able to speak English, even people working in accomodation! French people probably know English but they refuse to speak it; Italians don't know English that well, but they try their best using rolling R's and gestures. (I'm a bit ironic) | | | |
| ▲ | b3orn 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Announcements in English aren't done for every station. Usually only for central stations and airports. |
|
|
| ▲ | ExoticPearTree 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Funny thing, but the Swiss are looking at banning DB trains because they are never on time and messes up Switzerland’s public transport schedule. |
| |
| ▲ | mcv 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I thought they already rejected delayed trains. Trains that are on time are still allowed. But I'd love to see Switzerland take over some of those international connections. | | |
| ▲ | bionade24 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > But I'd love to see Switzerland take over some of those international connections. The Giruno EMUs of the SBB serving the Eurocity from Hamburg to Basel are having technical malfunctions causing delays & aborted trainrides for the last few weeks. The Eurocity(Express) Zurich-Munich is the most delayed long-distance train route in Germany. Most of the German route is only single-tracked and overcrowded. | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | timthorn 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I did learn German at school but it didn't help much when trying to get to Munich airport last year. I could understand what was going on with the cancelled trains at the station I boarded at, but the train I did catch end up tipping us all out after a few stops. I could make out a bit of what the driver said, but not enough to be sure of the detail, which is what really mattered. I expected to miss my flight, but just made it in the end. |
|
| ▲ | tonfa 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Germany trains (and Switzerland trains) as always on time, and the best train system, etc It's true of Switzerland and probably Austria. Germany is famous for having infrastructure issues that will take some time to resolve. Eg see https://chuuchuu.com/2025wrapped for some stats |
| |
| ▲ | creichenbach 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm a heavy public transport user in Switzerland, and even though it's almost a meme how reliable the trains are, reality is different. Yes, they operate in a way that make the stats look good (x% on time), but they take tradeoff to get there. E.g. they won't await connections if another train is a few minutes late. So you might have to wait for 30 minutes for the next one, or even longer if you're unlucky. And there's the occasional big incident, where you get stuck for several hours. I missed flights that way, even though planning in 3 hours of buffer. There is zero compensation in such cases as long as they bring you to your destination on the same day. Plus, several trains are regularly way too crowded. | | |
| ▲ | tonfa 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | In my experience, they do sometimes still wait (at least that was the case for a few trips with delays last summer). (And tbf I'm ok waiting 30min, with Taktfahrplan how much you wait is usually max 1h and often much shorter, my experience in other countries is often hours of delays in case of trouble) | |
| ▲ | comrade1234 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | They changed the policy maybe 5-years ago about a train waiting for a late train to come in because they found that it added additional delays to the entire system. I prefer the new way. | | |
| ▲ | creichenbach 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | > it added additional delays to the entire system Yes, obviously. And that hurts statistics. That's like killing sick cattle to be able to say that 100% of yours are healthy. | | |
| ▲ | ragall 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | No, it means they contain the damage and run the system in a healthy manner. | | |
| ▲ | gregorygoc 38 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Exactly, seriously complaining about the fact that the system is designed to run on time rather than trickle down delays is beyond me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | mcv 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Swiss trains are always on time. I've heard they've start to refuse delayed German trains entry to the country because their delays disrupt the system too much. The Swiss train system is excellent. The German train system is a joke. |
|
| ▲ | em500 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'd reverse the question ask why Germany (or any other country where English is not an official language, and does not majorly rely on tourism for income) would provide any public information in English? Commercial services can choose to do so a matter of self interest, but why would state financed services? |
| |
| ▲ | larnon 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Because the State wants to attract well educated international workers to fix it's failing economy? | | |
| ▲ | Flatterer3544 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Problem is that failing to communicate will lead to huge productivity holes, so to "fix it", either the natives need to learn a non native language or the incoming immigrants need to learn the native language.. So, attracting the international workforce to come Germany vs being able to fully utilise them are completely different ballparks.. | | |
| ▲ | kmeisthax 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is Germany we're talking about, right? Something like half the population already speaks English to some degree and that is specifically concentrated in the part of the country that is already highly educated and would be working with those immigrants. |
| |
| ▲ | rixed 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A "well educated" international worker willing to relocate in Germany would probably learn the language. | | |
| ▲ | jltsiren 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Educated immigrants often consider countries interchangeable. They are in a country, because they found an opportunity and took it. But they are not committed to stay, because better opportunities could arise elsewhere. When you have already immigrated once, doing it again is only going to get easier. Immigrants with fewer opportunities are more likely to try to learn the language and integrate. When a country is offering them something they can't find anywhere else, it makes more sense to go through all that effort. Even knowing that they will probably never fully fit in. |
| |
| ▲ | YouAreWRONGtoo 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [dead] | |
| ▲ | 476392647282 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It doesn't, though. It imports millions of uneducated illegals. Why would anyone choose to work their ass off for this corrupt regime and pay 50% in taxes? |
| |
| ▲ | stevage 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You're really wondering why a state-funded service would consider the needs of tourists? | | |
| ▲ | em500 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes. AFAICT, catering to the needs of tourists ranks very low among German voter priorities. | | | |
| ▲ | johnisgood 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I do not see the relation, mate. |
| |
| ▲ | RobotToaster 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | English is the most common lingua franca. |
|
|
| ▲ | hiq 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Germany trains (and Switzerland trains) Other commenters have already set the record straight, pointing out that these are clearly not in the same cluster. See also https://www.thelocal.de/20250430/switzerland-suspends-deutsc... Pay-walled, but the title says it all: "Switzerland suspends Deutsche Bahn trains due to chronic delays". DB is so unreliable that it impacts the networks of neighboring countries. |
|
| ▲ | ludicrousdispla 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's not so bad, with luck you'll eventually end up at a station outside of Germany. |
|
| ▲ | cardanome 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Germany had a great train system but Germany also has a big automobile industry that spends a lot of money on lobbying. In the end of the 90s with neoliberalism being very popular, it was decided to privatize the trains. The effect was only minimal investments in the infrastructure and a gradual rotting away of the train network. Now we a reaping what we have sown. The enshitification of the German trains was done on purpose so they don't compete with cars. |
|
| ▲ | hexbin010 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > Why they don't help at all? If it's anything like the UK, the staff have incredibly secure jobs and recently secured some good changes to their working conditions/pay. It's probably not in their contract to announce in other languages, so they do exactly what their contract says |
| |
| ▲ | pjerem 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Idk how it is in Germany but my wife is currently trying to became a train driver in France and there are far more requirements that what you would imagine. Even if the job is actually opened to basically everyone (and that’s pretty nice), you have to be in perfect physical and psychological shape with pretty strict tests, you have to be intellectually apt enough to follow the training which is pretty intense. You have to accept work conditions such as not knowing your work hours until the day before. You have to accept sleeping who knows where at least 2 times a week. You have to accept having only one weekend off per month. So what happens is that when you have that much filters and you still want to hire train drivers, you can’t afford to expect your drivers to know another language on top of all of the rest. | | |
| ▲ | flr03 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Nothing is perfect but living in the UK after living in France, I have now a lot more love for SNCF than I used too. | | |
| ▲ | pjerem 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Actually I’m a taking the train everyday to go to work and I have barely any complaint with the SNCF. Most of the time they do what they can to deal with issues. I don’t feel like there are too much issues it’s just they are extremely bad at communicating issues when they happen. Sometimes the train is not there when it should but on the screen it just disappears as if it passed. Most of the time it’s just 2-5 minutes late but you can’t know. Maybe it’s just late. Maybe the traffic is stopped. Who knows. I just dont understand how they don’t have people whose job is just writing messages for the information screens. What is worse is that in my region, they have a pretty decent community managers for live information but they only post information in twitter because why not. So they already have the people doing this work but those people are saying different things than what the screen shows. Just let them write things on the screens :D | |
| ▲ | uxcolumbo 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Why is that? Better service? |
|
| |
| ▲ | graemep 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I have found station and train staff in the UK to be very friendly and helpful. They do have very good pay (drivers can earn as much as some airline pilots) and a very good pension scheme on top of that. | | |
| ▲ | nephihaha 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I wish I could say the same. UK trains are so unreliable and expensive I barely ever use them. | |
| ▲ | hdgvhicv 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | drivers have amazingly good pay compared to say bus drivers, but station staff and on board staff don’t. |
|
|