| ▲ | nperson 9 hours ago | |
The less complex your train network, the easier it is to ensure trains are on time. France, Italy and Germany possibly have larger networks than Switzerland. | ||
| ▲ | mcv 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Then split your network into segments you can handle. Switzerland receives lots of international trains. Not only that; it has a lot of rail companies, serves even tiny villages, and has the highest use per capita in Europe. Size of the network is a lame excuse. German trains used to be fine. Now they're a disaster. | ||
| ▲ | ExoticPearTree 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Switzerland has all public transport synchronized across the country. In any of the countries you mentioned they don’t even gave synchronized public transport at city level. | ||
| ▲ | izacus 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
No, Swiss SBB is just generally very competent and has insane amount of traffic in comparison to any European rail. | ||
| ▲ | krior 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
The swiss have a more challenging geography and weather than Germany. They also spend far more per capita on their train system. All that and afaik they still manage to connect all important places. | ||
| ▲ | microtonal 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Except that The Netherlands has the busiest rail network in Europe [1] and still manages to be second in that list. [1] https://www.acm.nl/en/publications/acm-rail-monitor-netherla... | ||