Remix.run Logo
microtonal 10 hours ago

It's also funny considering how here in South America we look at Germany trains (and Switzerland trains)

That's very outdated, DB has been terrible for a long time though. Switzerland is still the best though. Here are some stats for 2025:

https://chuuchuu.com/2025wrapped

Since you have to scroll down quite a bit to get the list of most reliable European trains (with percentage on time):

1. Switzerland 97.8%

2. The Netherlands 93.9%

3. Belgium 88.6%

4. Austria 82.2%

5. France 79.7%

6. Italy 62.0%

7. Germany 58.5%

(Not sure why these are the only countries in the list.)

foxrider 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

After living in Italy for a few years - if you're doing worse than Italy with your train schedule it's time to reflect hard.

apexalpha 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Germany and Italy should gang up together to make the trains run on time and... wait a minute.

creichenbach 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As per my other comment, Swiss trains (especially SBB) are not as pleasant as they get credit for. I get a lot that "you know, in other countries it's much worse", and it reminds me of software hosting, where it was normal in the past to be offline occasionally. Then Google et al. came and showed that much more reliability is possible with good engineering. I think there would be a lot of room for improvement.

mcv 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I disagree. Swiss trains are a delight. They even have trains going up mountains (although some of those cost extra). Public transit in Switzerland was extremely reliable when I was there, and also according to official statistics.

gregorygoc 37 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Complaining about Swiss trains is beyond me.

nikeee 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Keep in mind that a train in Germany counts as one-time if it is less than 6 minutes late. In Switzerland, it's 3 minutes.

Also in Germany, a train that did not even arrive does not count as too late.

There is also a concept of the "Pofalla-Wende", which is when a train is so late that it just does a 180 and drives back, to mitigate that the delay doesn't carry over to the train's next route. Of course, that means that it skips the stations at the end of the route.

flr03 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That does not make Germany look any better but I find the "percentage on time" not very useful compared to the "years of delay" metric. And arguable a average/median delay per train would be better? Also some delay volatility data would be interesting.

If you look at France for example, 80% of trains are not punctual but the "total delays" is actually on the low range, France being on the large side with lots of lines, I would say that it shows that the delays (20% of the time) are actual shorts.

dddddaviddddd 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Canada: 30% on-time

https://media.viarail.ca/en/press-releases/2025/q1-2025-time...

ragall 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I gather that this is an average of all trains. In Italy, the high velocity train are quite punctual, but the slow regional trains drag the average down.

jansan 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In Germany in 2025 it got worse with only 55% of trains being on time (defined very generously as being less than 6 minutes late).

mcv 8 hours ago | parent [-]

I find this figure absolutely baffling. How can you run a train system with half of all trains being late?

apexalpha 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Someone has never been outside the Western world, lol.

In many countries the train comes when it comes and goes when it can, regardless of any fictional like schedules.

alexfoo 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

(Hence the occasionally heard witty announcement in the UK…)

“Please mind the gap between the timetable and reality.”

mcv 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I have. Mali didn't have trains at all. Our Indonesian train was on time.

It's not like countries outside Europe can't make trains run on time. Japan's are even more punctual than Switzerland's.

6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
nperson 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The less complex your train network, the easier it is to ensure trains are on time. France, Italy and Germany possibly have larger networks than Switzerland.

mcv 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Then split your network into segments you can handle. Switzerland receives lots of international trains. Not only that; it has a lot of rail companies, serves even tiny villages, and has the highest use per capita in Europe. Size of the network is a lame excuse. German trains used to be fine. Now they're a disaster.

ExoticPearTree 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Switzerland has all public transport synchronized across the country. In any of the countries you mentioned they don’t even gave synchronized public transport at city level.

izacus 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No, Swiss SBB is just generally very competent and has insane amount of traffic in comparison to any European rail.

krior 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The swiss have a more challenging geography and weather than Germany.

They also spend far more per capita on their train system.

All that and afaik they still manage to connect all important places.

microtonal 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Except that The Netherlands has the busiest rail network in Europe [1] and still manages to be second in that list.

[1] https://www.acm.nl/en/publications/acm-rail-monitor-netherla...

raverbashing 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Talk about a very appropriate domain name lol