| ▲ | smcleod 19 hours ago |
| I've been running it since the RC and am currently in the process of uninstalling it. The new UI is so incredibly ugly I honestly cannot understand how they thought it was acceptable to even released as a beta let alone an RC and now release. There's SO much padding and wasted screen real estate, disjointed looking floating inner panels, window corners that are so rounded you see gaps in full screen apps, inconsistencies everywhere and - well, I could go on. Basically the vibe I get from it is that they think their users are dumb - they won't care about things like this and that they want everything to look like a preschoolers tablet. |
|
| ▲ | rcarmo 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I count four different corner radius sizes currently on my screen, which is maddening. Apple has a thing against people with OCD. Or taste. The thing is horribly wasteful of screen real estate, and as someone who’s been writing a Mac blog for over two decades, I am so happy I started using Fedora two years ago—GNOME has its flaws, but it looks nicer than Tahoe. |
| |
| ▲ | rvrb 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Fedora Silverblue is the closest feeling to the macOS experience I fell in love with that I’ve had on Linux in, well, ever. Very happy with it on my desktop and laptop. It’s not perfect but it is less imperfect than modern macOS has become. Finding a laptop that works well is annoying, however. | | |
| ▲ | kminehart 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Finding a laptop that works well is annoying, however. It doesn't exist at the moment. :\ I would pay 2x the price of a macbook for a linux laptop with the same hardware quality. The battery life and power/efficiency of my m4 pro is insane. It's so good that it's really hard to justify using anything else right now. | | |
| ▲ | bombcar 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's sad that the best Linux laptop right now arguably is a M4 Mac virtualizing Linux. | | |
| ▲ | lylo 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Framework? | | |
| ▲ | herewulf 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I wanted to post this myself because I swear by my Framework 13 and it's my workhorse. However, it doesn't hold a candle to my wife's M3 Pro on a number of metrics mentioned here such as: Battery life, screen quality, and overall performance. The Framework (Intel 12th Gen) also has the added benefit of heating the house, particularly with graphics "heavy" workloads (lots of windows open in GNOME Mutter, VMs, etc). | |
| ▲ | geerlingguy 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Framework is nice but it's far from Apple's laptop hardware quality. The biggest draw of the Framework is its modularity. | | |
| ▲ | dsego 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Based on my framework 13 and macbook m1, I think the only downgrade are the speakers and the trackpad. The keyboard is actually an upgrade, the 2.8k screen has a better size ratio but the contrast is not as good, I'd say it's decent. The trackpad performs well but it's the old hinged design and not haptic. Being able to service my own laptop, replace parts and max out the storage for less money than a mid-spec macbook is just unbelievable. |
|
| |
| ▲ | treesknees 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Why not run it natively with Asahi Linux? | | |
| ▲ | Everdred2dx 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Well limiting to specifically OP's example (M4 Mac), Asahi doesn't support it yet. :( | |
| ▲ | crossroadsguy 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Is Asahi installed side by side on a mac? You pick it at boot? And how “install and just use” it is? | | |
| ▲ | neobrain 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Is Asahi installed side by side on a mac? Yes, the installer automatically (and reliably) resizes partitions for you. A minimum of about 70 GB for macOS is needed (anything lower is still possible but unsupported). > You pick it at boot? There's a default choice that will boot. > And how “install and just use” it is? Probably one of the smoothest Linux installs I've had in 10 years or so, since you just run the installer from macOS instead of flashing ISO files to an USB drive. |
| |
| ▲ | truncate 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | IIRC, there bunch of random things that still don't work -- no USB-C output, webcam, audio and if I've to guess suspend/resume is probably not rock solid either. The only benefit is that you get to use Linux, but then you may lose on actually getting work done without worrying about these issues. The new UI is inferior, but can still get things done. | | |
| ▲ | neobrain 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This information is very dated. Webcam/audio work fine nowadays, and suspend/resume have never had issues that I recall. IME the feature support page is very accurate (no hidden gotchas like "technically it works but it breaks after sleep"). USB-C output is indeed not working but actively making progress (so actively that some of the related patches have been sent to the kernel mailing list and merged this very week). | |
| ▲ | Wowfunhappy 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Webcam and audio both work now. I can't speak to how solid suspend/resume is because I haven't actually used it--I just follow the project--but I wouldn't necessarily assume it's flaky. |
| |
| ▲ | Wowfunhappy 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Asahi Linux doesn't support the M3 or M4. That said, I'd be curious why OP doesn't consider Asahi on M2 to be a good option. AFAIK the only thing missing at this point is Thunderbolt and USB-C display output (HDMI out works fine). | |
| ▲ | ohdeargodno 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Asahi is only supporting M1, and partly M2 I believe. M3 was enough of a change that there are no drivers for it. |
| |
| ▲ | risho 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | this is a psychotic question but have you actually tried doing that? like using a macbook as a vessel for running linux under parallels as a primary use? | | |
| ▲ | prmoustache 44 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I guess if you autostart the linux VM upon booting this should work. I am doing actually the same with BeOS but using a Linux as the hardware compatibility layer. Linux distro is configured to autologin to sway which starts a VM and run it fullscreen. The guest VM is configured to use all the laptop ram leaving only 1GB for the host. In the second virtual desktop the pulseaudio volume control, wifi and bluetooth management tools are automatically open so I can easily plug a BT headphone, switch network. The linux distro automatically shutdown if I shutdown the VM. I am using swaylock to lock the screen when I am away. |
|
| |
| ▲ | kaladin-jasnah 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm hoping maybe the Qualcomm laptops make some progress on battery life. I had an LG gram that had honestly surprisingly good battery life on Linux, and maybe the ThinkPads are good too. | | |
| ▲ | TuringNYC 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well the Qualcomm SnapDragon chips literally compete on operations-per-watt. But it depends on what you need -- raw horsepower with a mostly tethered laptop or on-the-go freedom. | | |
| ▲ | skydhash 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I found that I’m missing the netbook era. I need some 11inch laptop when I’m on the go for email, writing, and coding. For more focused task, I’m not giving up my 2 monitors setup and my mechanical keyboard so the computer form factor matters less. |
|
| |
| ▲ | viraptor 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > The battery life and power/efficiency of my m4 pro is insane. They're coming. Look for AMD Strix Halo chips. They're in the comparably comfortable efficiency range. | | |
| ▲ | srid 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > AMD Strix Halo chips Do you happen to know any laptop that has a) equivalent screen quality (retina resolution), b) keyboard, c) trackpad but with full Linux support where all hardware pheripherals just work? | | |
| ▲ | STKFLT 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The ThinkPad X1 series usually have great linux support and you can option them with 2.8k@120Hz OLED panels, which at 14" lands between the Air and the 14" Pro in terms of PPI. I have a couple generations old X1 Yoga and all of the hardware worked out of the box with Manjaro and Debian, including the touchscreen and active stylus. People usually buy them for the keyboards and trackpoint, but imo the touchpad is still pretty solid. It is a bit small on account of the trackpoint buttons taking up vertical real estate but its pretty responsive and multi-touch gestures work perfectly in my experience. I believe newer ones have larger trackpads than mine, though still not as large as a similarly sized mac. | | |
| ▲ | mikepurvis an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I have a Gen 12 X1 and I'm very happy with it; huge step up over my previous Dell XPS, and all the hardware works great on the latest kernel. | |
| ▲ | two_handfuls 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Reminder that Thinkpad's makers, Lenovo, has shipped a laptop preloaded with the Superfish malware (https://easytechsolver.com/what-is-the-lenovo-controversy/) | | |
| ▲ | TheAmazingRace 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is true. However, Superfish hasn’t been relevant in years and Lenovo walked back on including such malware going forward as far as I can tell. And furthermore, Superfish didn’t affect ThinkPads. Only lower end Lenovo models. | | |
| ▲ | darkwater 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | And surely didn't affect Linux installed on it, which is the topic of the thread. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | green7ea 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The HP zbook g1a ultra is as close as you can get with Strix Halo. There are two screen options and the OLED one is high resolution. It's Ubuntu certified as well and can run LLMs nicely. The keyboard, trackpad, etc are all to notch. It's somewhere in between a mac pro and max. I have one and love it but it's not close to my wife's mac on battery life. | | |
| ▲ | jim180 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | I've yet to understand the point of OLED, if it sits at 400nits. All Apple's devices from iPhone to Studio Display are brighter, some of them are much much brighter even with OLED :/ | | |
| ▲ | rxyz 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Contrast and pixel response time. OLED PC monitors still look amazing even with low all-screen brightness. |
|
| |
| ▲ | scrlk 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | HP ZBook Ultra G1a? It has Strix Halo, 14" 2880x1800 (242 ppi) 120 Hz VRR OLED, and Ubuntu 24.04 options. Can't speak for the keyboard, but HP ZBooks/EliteBooks tend to be decent. | | |
| ▲ | nullpoint420 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm typing this post on the 395+ 128gb RAM model. IMO, the keyboard is better than the one in the newest Macbook Pro. Just enough travel, and quiet enough so I don't disturb co-workers when I type. I use it for development running Fedora Workstation. My job involves spinning up lots of containers and K8S KIND clusters. I often reach for it instead of my 14" M4 Macbook. However, I will choose the Macbook Pro when I know I'll be away from a charger for a while. The HP, as great as it is, still has bad battery life. | | |
| ▲ | nullpoint420 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The only downside is that the webcam _does not work_ unless you use Ubuntu 20.04 w/ the OEM kernel package. The ISP driver which will enable the camera to work is in the process of being up-streamed, though. I believe they're targeting early 2025 for mainline Linux support. | | |
| ▲ | ayewo 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | > early 2025 Is that a typo? There’s barely 4 months left in 2025. |
| |
| ▲ | WesolyKubeczek 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Do you feel a difference between Strix Halo and other x86 machines you could lay your hands on to date? I want one, but with an M2 Max macbook pro and Zen2 desktop it feels very hard to justify. |
|
| |
| ▲ | diffeomorphism 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > retina resolution That just means 3024x1964. With other laptops you can either go up a step to 4k or down to OLED 2880xsomething. | | |
| ▲ | swiftcoder an hour ago | parent [-] | | Unfortunately it also means a software stack that can properly scale everything for such a display. Windows and Linux both have... issues around UI scaling that make this kind of a pain. |
| |
| ▲ | Demiurge 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Razer Blade is my windows laptop. The hardware is great, MacBook nice, but it needs the chip efficiency. | |
| ▲ | dismalaf 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Well, the highest resolution MacBook has less than 4K resolution and there's plenty of 4K laptops out there... Most "business" centric laptops work great with Linux, as long as you use a well supported distro (Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian, openSuse). YMMV if you use other distros... | | |
| ▲ | simonask 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think it’s debatable whether full 4K makes any sense on a 14” or 15” screen. | | |
| |
| ▲ | mistercheph 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Your best option is framework IMO. The 2.8k panels are overall inferior to Apple's across a number of metrics, but they have a higher pixel density than the Air 13, (and has the S-tier aspect ratio of 3:2). The FW13 keyboard is objectively pretty decent but not perfect, and is much much better than any keyboard Apple has made in the last decade, could be personal preference but apple has been making some pretty bad keyboards for a while now. Trackpad on FW13 is OK, no one even comes close to Apple, but it's pretty decent, nothing upsetting if you're comparing it to any non-apple trackpads. Framework has excellent linux suppport, all hardware bells and whistles generally work out of the box on every Linux distro, but Fedora, Ubuntu, and Bazzite are officially supported by Framework they QA against all three and work with maintainers to resolve issues and you can be totally confident that everything will just work. (At least work as well as it would on Windows!) The other two downsides relative to a macbook are build quality and support. Although the FW13 is pretty solid in practice, I have dropped mine dozens of times and throw it in my bag and treat it overall rough and it has take on some dings and scratches but everything still works. But the frame is not very rigid, it flexes in lots of places, and it just does not feel as nice and solid as a macbook. And support can be hit-or-miss, like with any small manufacturer. | | |
| ▲ | runjake 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think you’re talking about Apple’s butterfly keyboards which were only around for 3-4 years of the last decade you’re talking about. Apple’s keyboards have been great for 5+ years now. | | |
| ▲ | asimovDev 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | Agreed. Only issue is that they wear down really fast. Your fingers sand them down at a mindblowing pace, and soon enough all of them are smooth, with most used keys having shiny blemishes on them | | |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | benoau 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The performance seems to rival Apple's Pro / Max chips but the battery life can only do that for light workloads or videos. |
| |
| ▲ | moralestapia 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >I would pay 2x the price of a macbook for a linux laptop with the same hardware quality. Same, and I've been wanting this for 15 years now ... | |
| ▲ | backscratches 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Try starlabs, best build quality I've ever seen after apple | | | |
| ▲ | csomar 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I've asked this question very recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44319903 Spoiler Alert: There really isn't anything that comes close to the macbook (even at 2x price). | |
| ▲ | benoau 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's messed up TBH, the only laptops competitive on battery are Qualcomm which comes with a different set of sacrifices instead! | |
| ▲ | andrepd 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That's ridiculous. Thinkpads, Zephyrus G14, Framework, they all have performance, build quality, screens, battery, etc, comparable to a Mac. | | |
| ▲ | mbernstein 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Do they? So far I haven’t found anything that matches battery life, build quality, or trackpad quality. | | |
| ▲ | andrepd 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | The G14 definitely matches in build or exceeds in build quality, keyboard, trackpad, speakers, and display. Battery life is shorter though. But it has a better GPU and supports Linux, which is way more important to me than an hour or two extra battery. The Framework is also excellent, but with different compromises: that sweet display aspect ratio for instance, but no OLED. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Theodores 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I would pay 2x the price of a macbook for a linux laptop with the same hardware quality. How about half the price? Huawei are probably banned in the USA these days, however, the hardware quality is top notch and everything Linux works just fine out of the box. Not everything is perfect though, it all depends on what you want to do. If you are okay with integrated graphics (so no Blender or other 3D applications) but do need genuine Intel floating point single-thread performance, then give Huawei a go. I have had plenty of Dell XPS, Lenovo things and much else over the years and all of them have poor thermal management and tend to creak if you use less than four hands to pick them up. The Huawei machines are in a different league. As for battery life, I think you are right, but I am inanely loyal to genuine Intel and that means plugging in. I don't have problems with that. People do get triggered by Huawei though, because the dreaded communists will steal your soul and brainwash you into hating the American way of life. So you might want to just cover up the badging lest anyone be offended. Ironically, a Huawei Matebook X Pro running linux is the laptop that is least likely to spy on you because the camera folds down into the keyboard. |
| |
| ▲ | CraigJPerry 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Silverblue is very under-rated currently. I see it as a slightly more pragmatic immutable os. NixOS i keep wanting to throw in the bin randomly but i have to admit that when it all works, it's kinda beautiful to own - you can harness a lot of power for comparatively little spent in mental tax | |
| ▲ | a012 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I’ve tried Silverblue but it’s far from Mac experience, on my PC it feels sluggish and bloated. Perhaps I’m too simple but I only need a vanilla Linux just like now dead Intel Clearlinux with linux brew and Flatpak | |
| ▲ | jlvdh 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I was using Pop!_OS and really loved it. Feature wise it would be an excellent replacement and I love the idea of running Linux. However, one day when I tried to update the Nvidia driver it failed and when I tried to revert back I got a bunch of errors. My computer is foremost a tool to me and I don't particularly enjoy nor have time for stuff like fixing drivers. Despite apple's flaws it gives me something that just works everyday. | | |
| ▲ | bityard 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Nvidia has always been a PITA on Linux, whether you're using the open source or proprietary drivers. Decent drivers, documentation, and support for their Linux community has always been somewhere between actively hostile against to barely an afterthought. Go to any Linux distro subreddit right now and browse for people experiencing stability issues, random hanging, or no video on boot. Sometimes they don't mention it upfront but it almost always turns out they have an Nvidia card. AMD and Intel GPUs have much better native open source support and (usually!) work out of the box without any effort. | |
| ▲ | shelled 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sometimes I wonder how the Linux distro landscape would have looked if there hadn't been a new distro for a new use case or design choice or disagreement among lead devs? Could we have allocated the resources better at battling with Wi-Fi not working, USB creaking on the turns? Or those would have stayed the way they are, because these mostly come or should come from the OEMs/vendors? Would this be better for them if the onus was not to make it work on hundreds (or is it thousands?) of flavours? |
| |
| ▲ | rcarmo 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I have a couple that work quite well with it, including a very nice 10” one - https://taoofmac.com/space/reviews/2025/05/15/2230 And I run a macOS-like GNOME theme that is pretty great. | | | |
| ▲ | macco 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | My ThinkPad P1 Gen 7 works absolutely fine. I get about 10 hours of battery life out of it. You can get it with Fedora preinstalled. In my experience, ThinkPads generally work fine. | |
| ▲ | DimmieMan 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Silverblue is great but regular Fedora is worth a look too if you don't want to deal with the teething issues of managing all your dev-tools with Silverblue's immutable setup, granted that was 2 years ago when i tried so thing's might be better now. Infuriatingly; I have a macbook because a couple years ago I wanted a laptop that just worked while keeping my familiar tools but it really feels like Linux is trending up in polish and macOS on the down with an intersect possibly happening in a couple years. | | |
| ▲ | wyclif 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That Apple would allow this development to happen without any reversal is astounding. If allowed to continue it could seriously damage their MacBook market share. Then again, they may not care that much as long as they have the iPhone customer base. | | |
| ▲ | codr7 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Apple was once all about creating, lately it's all about consuming. I expect the MacBook to be replaced by the iPad any second now. |
| |
| ▲ | nullbyte808 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | In bluefin (silverblue based) they have brew preinstalled, which helps alot. Plus now its more mac-like. |
| |
| ▲ | anhner 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Calling gnome's UI better than macOS, even with Tahoe, is wild. | |
| ▲ | awesome_dude 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Are you using Fedora on the Mac (via Asahi)? Or are you using Fedora on an Intel/AMD laptop? | | |
| ▲ | rvrb 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | If it supported M4 I would be using it on my MacBook, but I am using a ThinkPad P14s gen 6 (AMD) right now. Some issues with suspend that I worked around with a kernel parameter but other than that, everything else worked out of the box | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | whywhywhywhy 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Do you mean corner radiuses on the edge of windows? Because corner radiuses within windows should be different from the edge ones because the same corner radius stacked within itself creates ugly corners. | |
| ▲ | hajile 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Doesn't MS still have screens rendered like Windows 3.1 or Win95 in some corners of the OS? | | |
| ▲ | luismedel 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'd pay (even more) for Apple to have the same backwards compatibility policy as Microsoft has. | | | |
| ▲ | winrid 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah because some enterprise customers override/extend those panels. | |
| ▲ | WXLCKNO 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And I love it | |
| ▲ | behnamoh 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | So? That doesn't make what Apple is doing sound any better. |
| |
| ▲ | truncate 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | GNOME does look quite nice and I use it on my desktop everyday. Unfortunately, once I go beyond programming/general productivity (e.g. photography, music recording) there is nothing that comes to MacOS+MacBook combo. Windows usually have ports of these apps, so I'm hoping maybe one day Linux can run those (we are already there with games). | | | |
| ▲ | nine_k 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I always thought that Gnome developers are imitating macOS. Not copying blindly, but following the ideas and intents. Finally I hear from real users that the Gnome team has not just reached parity, but has actually exceeded their source of inspiration. (Partly due to the degradation of the latter, but still.) | | |
| ▲ | robertlagrant 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | When it takes me 5 clicks and two open windows to pick a bluetooth speaker in Gnome, I remember how far behind it is from MacOS's 2 clicks and zero windows. | | |
| ▲ | Fluorescence 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What? It's pretty much the same. Click the speaker icon the menubar, bluetooth is one of the options, third click to choose a connection. There are plenty of excellent extensions if you want something different. I use dash-to-panel to combine the system tray in my dock and not have a pointless menu bar. > zero windows Are you not calling the MacOS sound-panel a window? It's the same type of panel you use in Gnome! I use both everyday and it's MacOS that's buggy, inconsistent and hobbled: - my speaker doesn't appear in the MacOS sound panel but does appear in the bluetooth section of settings so I have to go there to connect and it works as a speaker. MacOS is literally worse than Gnome at this specific task! - I also can't use my Mac as a bluetooth speaker but I can use Linux as one. Pretty lame. | | |
| ▲ | robertlagrant 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Are you not calling the MacOS sound-panel a window? When I click on the bluetooth icon in the top bar of MacOS it pops out a little list, and each bluetooth option has a toggle next to it where I can click to toggle. In my version of Gnome, I click at the top bar to open a menu, then click Bluetooth On (or the name of the currently connected device). That pops out a sub-menu, in which I click Bluetooth Settings. That opens a window that lists the paired Bluetooth devices. I can click on one, which opens another window over the top, where I can click a toggle to connect it. I stare at it waiting for it to connect (it's slightly less reliable at this than the Mac[0], so it's worth watching it) and then I click again to close that window, and finally click again to close the window underneath. Actually 7 clicks! [0] It could be the Mac is no better at this, but the UI interruption is basically zero to check and re-click, so it at least feels better, and I can do other stuff between checking. | | |
| ▲ | Fluorescence 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | If it annoys you then do look for an extension e.g. https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/1401/bluetooth-quick-... Recent vanilla gnome has the same type of pop-up as MacOS but it does it does have one more click to expand possible connections if changing connection not just toggling. You could use no clicks and truly no windows with "bluetoothctl connect ..." :) | | |
| ▲ | robertlagrant 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | It doesn't annoy me; it's just not as good! Glad to hear that when I upgrade it'll be almost a copy of the MacOS design by the sound of it. > You could use no clicks and truly no windows with "bluetoothctl connect ..." :) Sadly I change connection between my phone, my work laptop, and my home Ubuntu manually. Otherwise it'd just stay connected! |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | macco 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It doesn't. It takes 2 clicks. | | |
| ▲ | robertlagrant 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Maybe that's a new version of Gnome? I have 5 clicks (actually 7, I realised in a sibling comment). |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | Someone 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I count four different corner radius sizes currently on my screen, which is maddening. I don’t see the mere fact of having multiple radiuses alone is a good criticism of the UI. If seeing multiple corner radiuses infuriates you, how do you survive in the real world? (https://www.folklore.org/Round_Rects_Are_Everywhere.html) Or do you think it would look or work better with more consistency in corner radiuses? I would think radiuses look best when (somewhat) scaled to the dimensions of their rectangle (and that’s where, IMO, they may not be doing things the best way. For thin, long rectangles, I think the radius they chose is a tad too large, leaving barely any vertical straight lines) | |
| ▲ | vbezhenar 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Apple has a thing against people with OCD. Their window close button with slightly off cross in the red circle was a nightmare to my OCD. | | | |
| ▲ | iqandjoke 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It is only Apple can do. It needs courage and innovation. We, as user should not be beta tester. | | |
| ▲ | behnamoh 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | > It is only Apple can do. I've come to doubt this. Literally anything Apple does gets copied (sometimes even better than Apple's version). |
| |
| ▲ | lysace 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That's not possible. I saw a video yesterday where Greg Joswiak (SVP worldwide marketing at Apple) assured me that Apple has the best design team in the world. | | |
| ▲ | reactordev 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Making the world a better place by rounding off all the hard edges including those edge cases… If 12px won’t do, try 42 | |
| ▲ | 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | etempleton 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I have been running the beta from the beginning and they have improved quite a bit, but I am actually shocked they didn't delay Mac OS 26, because the design is so rough around the edges. Some of the larger aesthetic changes, such as the menu bar and the dock look good, but there is so much more that looks objectively awful. 1. the way window UI elements float in bubbles on the top over a white background is horrible. It looks amateurish. 2. Icons look low detail and blurry. At first I thought they were using low resolution placeholder icons, but no, the layered diffused glass effect just kind of translates to blurriness on many app icons. 3. The side bar, such as on Finder, just kind of floats there. That is fine and looks kind of neat on the Maps app as you can see some of the maps behind it, but on the Finder it is just a white bubble over top of a white background, which... is a choice. 4. The app launcher is gone, and replaced by Spotlight, which is worse. I could go on. The point is it is bad and Apple should be embarrassed. I say that as someone who likes Apple products alot. |
| |
| ▲ | gizajob 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I cannot believe the current state of affairs where me doing a Spotlight search for "drivers license" when I'm looking for a photograph of my drivers license to upload, that instead of finding it I'm now presented with a list of links to listen to, watch, or find out about the song Drivers License by Olivia Rodrigo. Why? Why!? Who is this helping? I'm fine with telling my computer that I am 42 years old and male and curmudgeonly and have been using a Mac for a good 25 years now and know how to find songs by Olivia Rodrigo online if I really need them. And okay spotlight can help fill in the blanks on dictionary searches and wikipedia info I GET IT... but my time and my mind are precious to me – if you're forcing me to use Spotlight or making it the way of searching my computer, please PLEASE do not fill my eyes and head with this time-wasting garbage. And I have a MacBook Pro M3 – it has a camera notch hidden in the black menu bar, the text of which now disappears if my mouse isn't up there, thus giving the appearance that my screen shrinks rather than giving me extra viewing real estate. The text is not some kind of distraction when it's above a tab bar filled with a multitude of jumbled icons and an address bar with text on it. But OH! sweeping left now reveals the camera notch in the middle of a WHITE menu bar. Just... Apple... for f*cks sake. I'm paying you. Please employ some people with aesthetic taste and judgement rather than the current cohort of yes-people and logistics wizards. Time for Tim Cook to go. The problem is at the top. | | |
| ▲ | quesera an hour ago | parent [-] | | You just spent far more time ranting about what Spotlight can index, than it would have taken to open the configuration and turn off the sources you do not want. Cue "discovery" rant. Defaults are chosen carefully, but they cannot meet every user's preferences. So, periodically spend a few minutes exploring the enormous software package that is your OS, and be happier for it. I find this vastly more rewarding than complaining on the Interwebs. YMMV. |
| |
| ▲ | thepryz 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The original, updated version of the Finder icon alone should have been enough of a warning that the UX designers at Apple have lost their minds and any aesthetic sense, let alone an ability to design interfaces that are functional, efficient, and well thought-out. https://512pixels.net/2025/06/wwdc25-macos-tahoe-breaks-deca... | | |
| ▲ | larholm 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Apple changed this in Tahoe Beta 2 https://512pixels.net/2025/06/finder-icon-fixed/ | | |
| ▲ | mitchell209 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | They know that. They’re saying the fact that it ever shipped in the first place should’ve been a warning sign. |
| |
| ▲ | josteink 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't get it either. I open the Finder app, and the sidebar is randomly turquoise, over a white background. It looks ugly, and I have no reason why that sidebar (unlike all other sidebars) is that specific colour. It just makes no sense. Edit: Oh My God. I just tested installing my own app on Tahoe, and the DMG looks absolutely broken with what used to be solid edges confined inside a window, now being stretched to the window-edges, blurred by the glass-effect making the header on top unreadable. THANKS APPLE. Jeez. |
| |
| ▲ | FabHK 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > 4. The app launcher is gone, and replaced by Spotlight, which is worse. Do you mean the Launchpad? (I've never used it; but always use Spotlight to launch apps.) | | |
| ▲ | redwall_hp an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I've been using Macs since before Launchpad and have not used it once. Spotlight predates it, and I switched to Alfred fairly early on. | |
| ▲ | basisword 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The biggest surprise to me from this whole beta period is that a significant number of people used Launchpad. I have absolutely zero idea why when Spotlight has existed for more than 20 years. Why would you ever want to click and page through a giant iPhone screen on a desktop/laptop computer? | | |
| ▲ | oneeyedpigeon 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You don't have to click: Launchpad is available via an unmodified F4, so it's a single button press to bring up instantly, no matter what you're doing. You don't have to "page through a giant iPhone screen", you can type and select. I used to use it all the time, without ever reaching for the mouse to do so. Launchpad also let you change the order of app icons and group them into pages and folders; I don't think the new system lets you do any of these things. Launchpad was focussed on a single task: launching an app. If I need to launch an app, I know I need to 99.9% of the time (I'm hedging; it's probably 100%), so there's no benefit showing me documents, web pages, and god-knows-what-else at the same time. I nearly forgot: while I was testing Tahoe, I had a situation in which some apps just did not show up when I typed. They were in the list, they just got filtered out incorrectly. I've no idea if this was a bug or not; I'll see when I upgrade to the final release. | | |
| ▲ | browningstreet 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | F4 on my Macbook Pro brings up Spotlight, not Launchpad. But, bringing up Spotlight, clicking backspace, then clicking on the Applications icon brings you basically Launchpad. They've mushed them together, but there seem to be three states: Spotlight with typing pre-filled, Spotlight bare with some additional icon options, and then Launchpad, which is more Spotlight than I remember it being. | |
| ▲ | zarzavat 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > so there's no benefit showing me documents, web pages, and god-knows-what-else at the same time. I always just disabled these from Spotlight. If I want to search for files I use the search bar in Finder. | |
| ▲ | basisword 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Interesting. I've never had any issues using Spotlight to search/open apps. For your use case unmodified F4 will bring up Spotlight now where you can type. If you want more precision unmodified F4 followed by CMD+1 will allow you to search only apps. | | |
| ▲ | oneeyedpigeon 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | > For your use case unmodified F4 will bring up Spotlight now where you can type. Yes, this is what I've been doing during the beta, and it's far less useful than Launchpad IME so far. > If you want more precision unmodified F4 followed by CMD+1 will allow you to search only apps. It looks like I had previously done so, and now the setting is 'stuck'. I.e. it's the default view — I can still go 'up' to search across stuff, but F4 takes me to an app launcher by default, so that's one drawback eliminated (thanks). As an aside, I've learnt just now while testing this that F4 has an awkward asymmetrical input buffer. You can open+close instantly with two quick presses, but the same does not work to close+open. I'm not really complaining so much about this, just mentioning it! |
|
| |
| ▲ | socalgal2 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't use Launchpad but I can say, for me, Spotlight sucks! It decides at random times not to complete. I have it set to show apps only. I don't want it to find other things. But quite often I'll press Cmd-Space and type something and it won't find it. For example I just tried "pho" and it did not show Photoshop (which is on my system) but did show stuff completely unrelated to apps and I double checked, I only have apps selected in the Spotlight Search Results section in settings. | | |
| ▲ | krackers 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is a uniquely new-macOS issue. Spotlight has never worked well since the big redesign in 10.10. In the snow leopard days it was predictable and seemed to be ordered by frequency of use. (There were occasional issues where the entire launchservices DB got messed up, but this can be fixed with an lsregister reset without reindexing all of the files). | |
| ▲ | robmsmt 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | This is a bug. The applications need to be reindexed. Happened to me on my work laptop and personal one | | |
| ▲ | oneeyedpigeon 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Schrödinger's Spotlight: always indexing and hogging your CPU, never quite indexing everything properly. |
|
| |
| ▲ | bombcar 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you have multiple ways to do something on a computer/phone, some relatively large percentage of people will fumble around until they figure out a way to do it - and then do it that way forever. So if someone accidentally triggered Launchpad and realized they could see their apps, they might use that forever (not knowing you can put your Applications folder in your Dock and use it as a start menu lol). | | |
| ▲ | mathfailure 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > not knowing you can put your Applications folder in your Dock and use it as a start menu Doesn't work for me (Sequoia 15.4) | |
| ▲ | oneeyedpigeon 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Or, equally, they might never discover the advantages of Launchpad and always use inferior alternatives :) | |
| ▲ | caycep 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | they've had a launch-pad-ey thing forever, I remember when our school lab had Mac IIs and Performas, and there was some simplified UI on top of finder which basically was all your apps in giant rectangular icons. I forget what it was called though. | | |
| ▲ | derefr 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It was called At Ease (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/At_Ease). I’m surprised to find out it was itself an Apple product; I had always assumed it was a third-party shell, akin to Norton Desktop for Windows 3.1. | |
| ▲ | dsego 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I remember seeing my work colleague drag the applications folder to the dock for quick access, this was before the modern launchpad, and before I even started using macs. |
|
| |
| ▲ | kbolino 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Spotlight indexing (mediaanalysisd, mds_stores) has a bad habit of running so aggressively when I'm not using the computer (I have an M1 mini and an M4 MBP) that it noticeably heats up the case. I've had to shut it off out of concern for wasted power and SSD life. Naturally, Apple has no response to this problem, and you can't really diagnose or fix anything on your own without turning off SIP, so I've had to disable Spotlight. Launchpad isn't as convenient, but it doesn't require indexing. | |
| ▲ | viraptor 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because I vaguely remember that one icon I use every other month, but can't recall the name. The icons are also ordered by installation time, so it's easy to jump to the most recent ones. I use it rarely, but sometimes I'm happy it's there. | | |
| ▲ | derefr 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > The icons are also ordered by installation time, so it's easy to jump to the most recent ones. If I had this need, it wouldn’t even occur to me to solve it with Launchpad; I would just go to /Applications in Finder and sort by “Date Added”. (Which is a non-default column, but a very helpful one, so the series of gestures to enable it for a given folder is almost reflexive to me now.) | | |
| ▲ | viraptor 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That's: 1 get the menu, 2 Finder, 3 go to applications, 4 View > Show View Options, 5 sort by popup, 6 choose date added, 7 actually look for the app. Compared to: 1 - 4-finger pinch, 2 look for the app. | |
| ▲ | oneeyedpigeon 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That only really works if you have a totally flat Applications hierarchy. Even by default, macOS creates a "Utilities" subfolder. |
| |
| ▲ | etempleton 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Exactly this. Most of the time I use spotlight like everyone else. |
| |
| ▲ | gcanyon 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > click and page through a giant iPhone screen 1. Launchpad filters based on what you type. You don't have to page through things
2. As soon as you type anything, the first hit is selected and the return key launches it
3. Launchpad shows nothing but apps. As an app launcher, it's fantastic. If Launchpad is gone I'm going to be sad. | | |
| ▲ | Telemakhos 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | Launchpad is not actually gone: it's now a sub-unit of Spotlight. I still have an M1 Macbook Pro with touch strip, and my Launchpad touch strip button still works, bringing up Spotlight but with a predicate that makes it search only ./Applications and ~/Applications. | | |
| |
| ▲ | sgerenser 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I always forget that Launchpad even exists. I guess it doesn't now. I suppose it might be helpful if you just know "I need that app that looks like X" and don't actually recall the first two letters of the app's name. | | | |
| ▲ | rectang 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Launchpad is an easy gesture with the trackpad (pinch with thumb and three fingers), then type to filter and return to launch. I got used to it for stuff I don't keep in the dock (which is a lot, since I have the dock on the side and only a few things in it). I suppose Spotlight is OK as a substitute: COMMAND-SPACE, then type to filter and return to launch. It's a little more clunky (as the search results take a few milliseconds to be assembled) but it'll work. | | |
| ▲ | data-ottawa 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What feels breaking there is when you pinch to open launchpad you are not on home row, so typing to filter is inferior to swiping and clicking large targets. Cmd+space to open spotlight already worked and typing was the best option for that use case. I do like the new spotlight experience but this feels like losing a gesture, and it does not spark joy scrolling through the app list. | |
| ▲ | lwkl 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I just tried it. The gesture you mentioned now opens the spotlight application search and there is no delay. | |
| ▲ | 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | physicsguy 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because Spotlight seems to fall over regularly and not find files. Earlier this year it stopped finding applications and I had to run some shell command to delete it's cache and recreate it. | |
| ▲ | pdntspa 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What if you forgot the name of the app? What if you rely on groupings to remember what you have installed for a given activity? What if you want a quick visual overview of what is available to you? What if you like or even prefer launchpad? What if you install tons of tiny little apps that have a specific, if infrequently used, purpose? What if you enjoy a little app gardening? What if you don't like command-prompt style interactions? What if you see value in having more than one way to do something? What if you have 20+ years of muscle memory established? What if the only thing you know prior is how to use your iphone? And on another note, what is it with tech people lacking the ability to see how other types of people may want to use the hardware they paid for with their hard earned dollars? I am so sick of this awful perspective of, "everybody in the world must be exactly like me" | |
| ▲ | wyclif 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You wouldn't if you are a software engineer or some other power user. The sad fact is Apple knows that the majority of macOS users are accustomed to an iPhone-like workflow, which is swipe-centric, not keyboard-centric. | | | |
| ▲ | throwaway290 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | the app doesn't appear in spotlight until it's indexed. also spotlight hogs resources indexing stuff all the time, completely pointless when you just want a list of apps | |
| ▲ | dkga 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | My sentiments exactly | |
| ▲ | gedy 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Shocking as it is, search based UIs are really despised by some people (me). I greatly prefer visual/spatial browsing | | |
| ▲ | brandall10 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's not the mode so much as the comparative efficiency. In a handful of keystrokes you can launch a commonly used app in under a second. Any type of visual browsing mode is going to take an order of magnitude more time/effort. For people who never work with things like terminals, sure. For fellow devs, it's an unusual choice unless they routinely cycle through irregularly used apps w/ hard to remember names. | | |
| ▲ | TomaszZielinski 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I click one icon, then another. It takes say 2s. Typing two letters and pressing enter would take 10x faster, so 0.2s. Given that I delegated work to AI agents, that’s 1.8s less of waiting :)) | |
| ▲ | pdntspa 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | As a fellow dev, command line shit is a pain in the ass sometimes. I grew up as a Windows kid, visual browsing for stuff is sometimes the only way to fly. I absolutely loathe the amount of brute-force memorization that is required to operate a command-line efficiently. It took YEARS to memorize simple linux shit Everyone talks about how CLI is supposedly way more efficient. It is way more efficient to THEM. And now we are stuck in a hell where a good deal of functionality is only accessible if you want and are able to memorize the arcane nonsense that are command names, or the design-by-committee naming choices of moronic PMs who can't stop lapping up whatever bullshit marketing tells them to | | |
| ▲ | flakes 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I absolutely loathe the amount of brute-force memorization that is required to operate a command-line efficiently. It took YEARS to memorize simple linux shit Not to invalidate your experience, but you shouldn’t need to memorize too much to use the common command line tools (although it does always help to have more experience using them). I recommend always keeping a second terminal session open, purely for referencing man pages. You should be able to see most options easily, or be able to grep for the instructions you need. The tight integration between documentation within the CLI, coupled to the exact software version you have installed, helps immensely when invoking CLI tools. For the common linux tooling, found in most distros (e.g. coreutils or common busybox ops) the documentation in man pages is quite excellent. | | |
| ▲ | pdntspa 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | While I think man pages are perfectly fine as documentation, the terminal interface for accessing them is awful (more mysterious keypresses or incantations to memorize if you want to do anything more than scroll), and visually I have always found them very difficult to scan visually, particularly if I wasn't sure of the exact wording for the task I needed, or if I am thinking in a different vocabulary. Plus theres the whole wall-of-text thing that makes me kind of instinctively bounce out. A lot of them also lack sufficient (or any) examples, which are the things I need to see to learn. Making sense of the their sometimes (and seemingly intentionally) obtuse wording when I'm trying to do something I'm not already familiar with makes them a lot harder to parse than they need to be. And many of the commands are extremely arbitrary. `cd` (change directory) very well could have been `mf` (move folder). `del` in DOS is `rm` in Linux. `move` vs `mv`, `copy` vs `cp`, etc etc. There's no common orthodoxy. If you are not well versed in the history of this stuff its all gobbledygook. LLMs have been great in this regard, as they can supply those missing examples and then explain to me exactly what it is doing, oftentimes worded more clearly than the original documentation. And they can help me string together whole sequences. | | |
| ▲ | johnisgood 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | So a TL;DR of your comment is that you just have to learn / memorize to use things. That applies to everything, not just what you are discussing here. If you only use 'cd', 'mv', 'rm', and 'ln', then really, there is not much to learn. Perhaps the '-rf' option to 'rm', which is how you delete directories (that are not empty). You complained about the naming, but 'mv' requires fewer keystrokes than 'move', and once you know that 'mv' = move, 'rm' = remove, and so on, then what is the issue? It makes sense. DOS had just as "arbitrary" names: 'del' instead of 'rm', for example. The UNIX versions are deliberately short for efficiency, and once you learn them, they are universal. Man pages are fine. Just press '/' to search by string or regex, and 'n' for next match. They are also consistent: if you want a particular section, you search for it. But it is important to remember that man pages are reference material, not tutorials. If you want quick examples, try https://tldr.sh, https://cheat.sh, or another alternative. If this is difficult, or you simply do not want to learn it, that is fine: use what works for you. But if you are a programmer, you are going to be learning tools constantly, and the core UNIX utilities are among the simplest. Once learned, they do not change. Personally, I have not had to learn anything new about them since I was 13. I am 31 now. You learn once, and you use forever. That said, there are real examples of arcane tools. 'ffmpeg' and 'rsync' have some of the most obscure command-line options I have ever seen, which is why I keep bash aliases and functions for the things I do often. That is how you make your life easier as a programmer: learn the fundamentals, then abstract the complexity where it makes sense. TL;DR: Learning is not optional. Whether it is GNU/POSIX utilities, GUIs, wizards, or even LLMs, you still have to learn them. Man pages are reference material, not tutorials. Learn the basics once, and you are set for life. | | |
| ▲ | pdntspa 40 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I don't think you fully understood my comment. > Man pages are fine. Just press '/' to search by string or regex, and 'n' for next match. They are also consistent: if you want a particular section, you search for it. But it is important to remember that man pages are reference material, not tutorials.
You need to step outside your own shoes and approach these from the perspective of someone who is new. Yes you have to learn things, that is obvious.But not everyone gets the chance to do that before they are dropped in a situation where the knowledge is needed. Up until a few years ago (before LLMs) if that was your case and you didnt know how to articulate what you wanted to google (or a teammate), you were fucked. Like with VI or with emacs. It's sooooooo easy to screw things up in a big way. Better hope you remembered to type shift-colon-Q-exclamation instead of shift-colon-W-Q! Please, tell me how that makes any sense to anyone without a background in *nix stuff. I did not grow up in the environment where the above incantations had any context. It was literally a bunch of gobbledygook that made no sense. Why "write" instead of "save"? Why 'quit' instead of 'exit'? In fact I had VI dropped on me quite suddenly for a job, that was a real trial by fire, and I remember this well. (And yes I can operate VI quite fine now, thank you) | |
| ▲ | skydhash 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > ffmpeg' and 'rsync' have some of the most obscure command-line options I have ever seen, These are power tools, meanings they set out to solve one problem quite extensively. They’re not really meant to use as is (just like git), best is to write some alias or functions as a wrapper (or memorize the set of flags you use most). | | | |
| ▲ | FabHK 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Incidentally, there's a TL;DR app as an alternative to man [0] that just gives you the most common examples/use cases for any command. Quite useful. [0] `brew install tealdeer`, then invoke with e.g. `tldr chown`. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | KPGv2 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I use it when I can't remember the name of an app, or when I've first installed an app and it's not indexed yet. |
|
| |
| ▲ | oneeyedpigeon 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | My big issue with the icons-in-menus is that they don't align properly. Each 'row' in a menu is an optional icon with some text to the right of it. But when an icon isn't displayed, the text shifts left into its position, meaning that menu text no longer aligns nicely on the left. | |
| ▲ | dsego 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Looking at the Slack icon right now, and it just looks blurry and low resolution, same for Calendar and some others, it's awful. | | | |
| ▲ | TomaszZielinski 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Usually I just go with the flow, because what else I could do :)? But somehow the missing App Laucher made me bit sad (well, to the extent software can make one sad :)) - even though I can always switch to Finder to browse apps, App Launcher has some nice visual quality to it that makes it more pleasant to use for me.. | |
| ▲ | dangus 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I agree with a lot of what you said but the app launcher was dumb. It was just the iPhone’s Home Screen ported to Mac. Spotlight is way faster than that when you’re at a keyboard. I barely even use the dock, just command space and type in the first few letters of the program I want. Clicking is for people with too much time on their hands. | | |
| ▲ | etempleton 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | It is for finding a program or quickly browsing what apps are installed when I don’t know the name. I find it useful in an unfamiliar machine. Yes, like most people, I launch apps primarily with Spotlight. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | rvrb 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It was the straw that broke the camel’s back for me. After trying out the preview for a month, the writing was on the wall, and I began the process of switching to a Thinkpad with Linux. I am now fully off macOS for the first time in 20 years of being an Apple die hard. I could use a lot of emotionally loaded words to describe how I feel about this release, but the long and short of it is that I am no longer the target audience for Apple. |
| |
| ▲ | stock_toaster 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Similar story here. Loong time Apple fan, but as they say.. "trust arrives walking, but leaves on a horse". I'm real mad! I installed tahoe in a virtualbuddy VM to see how it was before running on my main system... and.... I will be definitely be keeping Sequoia for a while (at least a year, probably). If the situation does not improve in the meantime, I will probably switch to a framework laptop running cosmic desktop or something like that. | |
| ▲ | Lio 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yep I feel the same. To know if you're the target user or not I guess you go to Apple's marketing material. Do you see anyone that looks like you, doing anything that looks like what you do? I don't and I can't remember the last time I did. It seems to be a lifestyle brand now for people I have little in common with. At least with Linux there's the possibility that you can make it your own even if it's not that way right now. | |
| ▲ | yesnomaybe 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In the same boat. After like 15 years I had enough. I've started de-Apple'ing my life in 2024. Still run M1 Pro Mac from work, which is great. 2 days ago I've finally ordered all the parts for a Linux PC, high spec. Not for gaming or so, just for compute. I'm soooo looking forward to the freedom that this will bring. The stuff that I already run on Linux, the distros are all great. I love Gnome for how it looks and KDE for how seamless it works. The new PC will let me tinker and try and hop and swap like I could never dream of for so many years. | | |
| ▲ | lionkor 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Curious what kind of specs you've decided on, would you share? My mind always jumps to EPYC or Threadripper for this kind of use-case |
| |
| ▲ | ksec 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I have no where to go. I want to move away from iPhone, but Pixel is not available in my place, and Google doesn't seems to care about distribution. Nor does it do enough with its SoC development. There aren't anything come close on Laptop. And Windows or Linux aren't exactly in good shape either. I have no where to run. And I have wished for a third option for a very very long time. | | |
| ▲ | yesnomaybe 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | You just move away from them on your computer. Just keep the iphone. It's a minor device. That's what I plan on doing. If I get fed up with my iphone, I also have nowhere to go. so will reduce usage. Sideloading gets more and more difficult everywhere. |
| |
| ▲ | leptons 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Similar story here, but going from Windows to Linux. It seems like Linux is gaining some market share with the OS disasters from both Apple and Microsoft. | |
| ▲ | caycep 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Just run linux with utm! |
|
|
| ▲ | itopaloglu83 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It’s ugly as hell and plain stupid. I couldn’t watch the WWDC and when I saw the screenshots I thought it was a joke. Giant buttons with weird padding and extreme transparency effects. This is going to sound harsh but it looks like when “working” from home, Apple engineers outsourced their work to amateurs online. I simply cannot believe that Apple is shipping an OS this out of touch with elegance. Steve Jobs said in his inauguration speech that he slept on the floor to take typography classes and later obsessed over having great typefaces on Macs. Steve would’ve burn the place down instead of shipping a crap like this. |
| |
| ▲ | codr7 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I've worked as a developer at Apple, I'm not surprised. | |
| ▲ | leptons 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Or maybe Steve would tell us all that we're "holding it wrong". |
|
|
| ▲ | lynndotpy 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I try not to indulge in negativity and scorn, but I agree with these sentiments. This is resoundly a regression. Text overlapping on text, searchboxes that are broken and now just function as text boxes, increased latency throughout the operating system. It's so bad that it's kind of fascinating. Unfortunately, even "Reduce Transparency" doesn't fix the LG update. |
|
| ▲ | esskay 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The whole "Liquid Glass" UI is by far their worst ever take on a design language. It feels like stepping backwards to web 2.0 but with even bigger accessibility issues. It doesn't look or feel modern, its ugly, inconsistent and just all around crap. God knows what they were thinking with this. Also who on earth green lit these low resolution looking blurry icons everywhere?! |
| |
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | karel-3d 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't mind it on iOS I need to say, I was expecting to hate it and it's... okay. I like that I can make all icons just black. It's really atrocious on macOS though. The new Finder looks so stupid. Preview now has artificially rounded corners in PDFs! What are we even doing here. |
|
|
| ▲ | coldpie 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > The new UI is so incredibly ugly I honestly cannot understand how they thought it was acceptable to even released as a beta let alone an RC and now release. I feel like if you replaced all of the paper in a company's printers with transparency sheets you'd be fired because that's obviously a stupid idea that would never work. But then I guess that's why I'm not a software UI designer. |
|
| ▲ | 827a 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah similar situation here. I've been running it since basically the day after WWDC, and I've just had this sinking feeling that its so bad, they wouldn't be able to fix it before release. Or, they don't even view it as something that needs fixing. I'll begrudgingly get a couple more years out of this personal M2 Air, but my engineering team is prepping to do upgrades on some older M1 Pros we've had since launch, and after seeing Tahoe, the CTO and I formed a plan to give devs the option of getting either an M4 Pro or a Framework. We haven't launched yet, but I think a solid number of our engineers are going to opt for the Framework, hopefully as high as half. |
|
| ▲ | userbinator 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There's SO much padding and wasted screen real estate That seems to be a growing trend ever since "UX designers" started taking over (early 2010s?), to the point that I wonder if they're trying to see how far they can take it. |
| |
| ▲ | b3ing 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Who cares? if the senior designer is hot and young with 1 yr of experience that’s all that matters | |
| ▲ | zarzavat 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you live in Figma then you never have to use what you design. | |
| ▲ | 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | kkylin 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There are also under-the-hood changes that I found truly upsetting: among other things, all the Emacs versions I've tried (stock GNU Emacs or Mac Port, downloaded binary blobs and compiled on my machine) are either immediately unusable or become so slow after a day that they are almost unusable. Tracing things on Instruments suggests a culprit (the culprit?) is NSAutofillHeuristicController. This is not a new feature, but I'm guessing with them pushing Apple Intelligence it was rewritten. AFAIK no obvious way to disable this "feature". (Turning off Apple Intelligence doesn't seem to do it.) I'm contemplating rolling back to Sequoia. |
| |
| ▲ | rick_dalton 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The developer of ghostty had this exact same issue with his terminal. Ironically apple's iCloud password autofill extension on firefox also practically halves my firefox performance. Seems like they haven't figured out autofill yet. https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/commit/b58a761aba75fa... | |
| ▲ | nitros 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The following should fix that: defaults write org.gnu.Emacs NSAutoFillHeuristicControllerEnabled "NO"
| | | |
| ▲ | josteink 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > among other things, all the Emacs versions I've tried (stock GNU Emacs or Mac Port, downloaded binary blobs and compiled on my machine) are either immediately unusable or become so slow after a day that they are almost unusable. So basically my #1 work tool will no longer work. That’s a hard deal-breaker right there. As a longer-term means of escape, what’s the best way to run a «full» Linux desktop on a otherwise managed Mac? | | |
| ▲ | skydhash 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Parallel or Vmware (the former is paid and the latter is tortuous to download). Then you can go with debian (for minimal installation) or fedora (for ready to work desktop installation). Works quite great. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | rick_dalton 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I was on RC too, for a few days, and also uninstalled. I'm glad I did, the fresh Sequoia install feels much nicher. Even with reduce transparency on, the design was too ugly and the drab gray icon jails for non-squircle icons were downright offensive. First macOS version I'm gonna skip and I've been a day one updater since mountain lion, very sad. |
| |
| ▲ | cmckn 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | lol are you an ATP listener? I don’t think the icon situation is enough to keep me off the release, but agree that the design is just kind of a mess and not my taste. | | |
| ▲ | bombcar 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | ATP was enough to convince me to tell people at work not to upgrade right away. Last time I did this was ... the version that removed 32bit compatibility, I think? | |
| ▲ | rick_dalton 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Haha I'm subscribed but haven't listened to that episode, I took the squircle jail term from the arstechnica tahoe review. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | sgarland 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I made the mistake of updating my phone, and immediately regretted it. We tried Liquid Glass already, it was called mid-aughts Windows. It sucked then, and it sucks now. |
| |
| ▲ | trinix912 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Quite an insult to Windows Vista and Windows 7, where Microsoft actually took care to make things consistent and text readable. Here they didn't even put shadows behind all labels! | |
| ▲ | ibfreeekout 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm glad I'm not the only one getting Vista vibes with this look. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | figassis 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is quite a departure from the company the pioneered UX obsession and attention to the smallest detail. What's happening here? |
| |
| ▲ | Lutzb 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Steve Jobs is no longer there to reign in the designers. | | |
| ▲ | codr7 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Not just designers, it's like the entire company has grown up depending on Jobs to course correct. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | bradgessler 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It would be one thing if they excessively rounded and padded the windows, but they shipped with a bunch of different padding and border radii. So far I’ve counted 4 different borders, and I’m sure there’s more. |
| |
| ▲ | rcarmo 18 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, 4 different corner radius sizes is where I’m at too. Won’t be surprised if there are more. | | |
| ▲ | bradgessler 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | I just counted 5 different radii in Apple’s apps alone. I also discovered they space the window control buttons in all sorts of different spots to, so it’s even more insane than just multiple radii. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | amarshall 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > SO much padding No idea on macOS, but turn on Reduce Transparency on iOS and there’s tons of padding most of the time, but then sometimes zero padding. And I mean zero. The edges of buttons and text are at the edge of the underlying background. It’s…embarrassing. |
| |
| ▲ | rafram 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I noticed that in iOS Safari. Reduce Transparency brings back the bottom toolbar containing the search/URL field and buttons, but there’s zero padding between the buttons and the edge. Makes it fairly obvious that nobody tested it. | | |
| ▲ | amarshall 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Enabling Reduce Transparency is a sure-fire way to find a dozen bugs within a few hours. It is always quite apparent no one who is empowered tests it at Apple. At least the padding issue is the one Feedback report I sent that got the “more than 10 similar issues” label so it may actual get fixed. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 00deadbeef 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Everything I've seen of it looks a disaster. I'll wait for macOS 27. |
| |
| ▲ | vunderba 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I have a Mac M1 that's been on MacOS 14 Sonoma for a couple years at this point - I've not seen anything even remotely interesting in later releases that could incentivize me to roll the dice and upgrade. | | |
| ▲ | apparent 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | My Mac is also on Sonoma. I'm sure there are some incremental features that I would appreciate, but I'm always worried about what's going to break or be worse with the next OS update. I'll update my phone because iOS jumps are bigger in terms of functionality. But 14 years in, OSX just doesn't have a lot of new bells and whistles that I care about. The last time I updated, I was only excited about getting Sidecar functionality so I could dual-screen onto my iPad. When a minor feature like this is the most memorable, that's saying something. I think the only thing that would get me to update would be notable AI improvements. But seeing what I've seen of AI on iOS, I'm in no rush. |
| |
| ▲ | lysace 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Waiting an extra year to jump on new macOS releases has been the norm for sane people for quite some time now. It sucks if you buy a new mac which isn't supported by older macOS releases though, so maybe don't do that for a year or so. I guess you sometimes just have to put your new Apple device in storage for a year until there's functional software. | | |
| ▲ | stevage 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | For me I simply don't upgrade ever until I'm forced to, usually by an app that I want to use. As someone without an iPhone and who doesn't really use included desktop apps, there are simply never any improvements in the OS for me, only regressions. | |
| ▲ | 00deadbeef 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I usually wait 6 months, but this time I plan to skip the release altogether | |
| ▲ | reaperducer 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Waiting an extra year to jump on new macOS releases has been the norm for sane people for quite some time now. /Looking forward to macOS Fresno. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | blinkingled 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Ugh I upgraded excitedly and can't stand the UI - there is no upside to any of it. Also for some reason things are also beachballing and VSCode keeps crashing - new M4 MBP. All the system log errors are present exactly as they were and my USB-C dock with Ethernet port still doesn't work. |
|
| ▲ | pfortuny 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Either Tim Cook does not use a Mac computer or he does not notice/care. I am not saying he should helicopter-parent all the design process but the "finished" product? So: that is Apple's CEO for you. |
| |
|
| ▲ | crossroadsguy 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > they think their users are dumb Aren’t they/we? :-) *majority of Well, hasn’t this been the single biggest reason for their sustained stellar returns year after year where often (or maybe most of the time) the biggest change their devices (like iPhones) used to see was the version number change e.g. iPhone 13 -> 14. For the rest of their users — they make a noise (which is not even feeble in comparison), bicker around, lament the fact that the other alternative is Google (Windows and the Wild Linux West), and they stay. Rinse, repeat. |
|
| ▲ | PlanksVariable 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That was my experience with liquid glass on mobile. I’d heard it was bad, thought it couldn’t possible be that bad then tried it and was flabbergasted. Really unfortunate. |
|
| ▲ | arthurcolle 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's very unstable, indexing doesn't work anymore |
|
| ▲ | coldtea 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The Finder looks like shit. The sidebar is like badly retrofited from another program, perhaps from some crappy Gnome theme. The Control Center (or however they call the drop down window with quick controls for volume, wifi, brigthness, etc) has floating isolated icons like crap. Bring back Scott Forstall. Give him a big bonus. Let him fix this shit. Otherwise, the code changes and actual features are probably fine. |
| |
| ▲ | laborcontract 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | I’m glad to see another member of Club Forstall here. My biggest wish for Apple is to bring back Forstall. Letting him go was their biggest mistake. |
|
|
| ▲ | shelled 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I just installed it (had to; if I am using the Mac, I'd rather be on the latest OS for security and compatibility reasons), and it is just disgusting. It is more disgusting than the iOS 26 monstrosity. I mean, how do you even provide constructive feedback to such a pathetic design choice? Not that this company ever deals in feedback (unless it's a strong feedback directly to its wallet). I do believe they are just exhibiting sheer incompetence and intellectual bankruptcy as a corporation. Is it beginning of an end? I don't know. Do giga corps even die anymore? |
|
| ▲ | runjake 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Can you post screenshots of what you mean? I see grossly rounded corners in some apps, but I don't see the other stuff like gaps in window corners for full screen apps. I may have some config bit flipped that has disabled those. Yeah, the new corner radius is ugly but by and large, it's not much different than before, from what I see so far. |
| |
| ▲ | mickle00 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | https://imgur.com/a/jLPM9oV this is what I'm seeing with Safari, WhatsApp and Chrome all maximized but with various radius on each corner. | | |
| ▲ | cesarvarela an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | This issue is with app developers not using native libraries, not Apple. | |
| ▲ | whywhywhywhy 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is like back when a lot of major devs like Adobe just straight up started faking window borders instead of updating their apps to the newer framework and it all looked and felt inconsistent or just obviously way off. | |
| ▲ | stefanfisk 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Wow! At this point I wouldn’t be surprised if they started mixing square corners with rounded just for the hell of it. | |
| ▲ | rubatuga 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Holy crap is this real?? | | |
| ▲ | coldtea 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Brome Chrome and/or WhatsApp using their own window borders, and their stuck to the previous macOS look. They'll update them, but I wish they used the native chrome (no pun intended) |
| |
| ▲ | datenyan 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Good lord, that's awful. I'm definitely firmly in Camp Apple for the most part, but this just looks actually atrocious. | |
| ▲ | leptons 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If this were April 1st, it might make sense. But this is a major OS release by a brand that's famous for its design aesthetic. What the actual fuck Apple? Does nobody test anything anymore? How did this get out of the lab? Who exactly is steering this ship? Tim Cook's days at the helm might be winding down. | | |
| ▲ | coldtea 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Probably not Apple's fault for that one, but Chrome and/or WhatsApp drawing their own window borders (with radius to match the previous macOS release) | |
| ▲ | richrichardsson 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Does nobody test anything anymore? Honestly feels like QA and release qualification are non-existent in so many organisations these days. This can't possibly be the case though, right? Right? |
|
| |
| ▲ | goalieca 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Try running console with tmux. The window menu just floats there instead of being snugly fit against the bottom from end to end. |
|
|
| ▲ | uptown 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How hard is it to downgrade? |
|
| ▲ | andrepd 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmWOtf4Ziso Look how far we've fallen. |
|
| ▲ | quotemstr 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > There's SO much padding and wasted screen real estate, disjointed looking floating inner panels, window corners that are so rounded you see gaps in full screen apps, inconsistencies everywhere and - well, I could go on. Remember in the beforetimes when we decoupled themes from OS updates? Wouldn't it be nice if once again we discovered this lost technology that let different users have different UIs? |
|
| ▲ | msk-lywenn 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Did you notice any impact on battery life? |
| |
| ▲ | reddalo 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm afraid for the battery life of my MacBook Pro 2019 (Intel). I'll think I'll never update and just keep using Sequoia until I switch to Linux. | | |
| ▲ | luismedel 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | You're in luck. Your device isn't supported. | | |
| ▲ | reddalo 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's supported. But it's going to be the last major OS update for my device, so I won't upgrade. I don't want to be stuck with a half-assed version. |
|
| |
| ▲ | kcplate 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Mine has been fine, literally no perceptible differences on my MBA M4 since I loaded the public beta a few weeks ago. |
|
|
| ▲ | BatteryMountain 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Honestly, Windows 7's Aero effects are better looking. Best thing after that is KDE (with light customizations). Everything else has regressed. |
|
| ▲ | divan 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Training/preparing users for upcoming AR glasses interfaces? |
|
| ▲ | dangus 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My progression: 1. Apple photos redesign from last year sucks and I’m already frustrated with iCloud abstraction and lack of cross platform friendliness 2. Switch to an alternate cloud photos provider 3. Find out about Liquid Glass, looks like shit, impulse sell my MacBook Pro in favor of a Framework 4. Surprise surprise, it’s actually the year of the Linux desktop. My gaming situation is way better on Linux and it does everything my Mac did. The only compromise is my need to carry a big extra battery around. |
|
| ▲ | diffrinse 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| So the Gnome 3 gang were ahead of their time? |
| |
|
| ▲ | jdkee 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Steve Jobs would never have allowed this to be released. |
| |
| ▲ | eloisant 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | People need to stop idolizing Steve Jobs like Apple only produced consistent UI when he was there. Apple have never respected its own guidelines, for example in the early days of MacOSX there were "brushed metal" apps that were supposed to be (according to the guidelines) for small non-resizable windows. Still, there most popular app, iTunes, broke that by being brushed metal despite being a big, resizable window. | | |
| ▲ | agos 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | iTunes also had a modal settings window, in defiance of another rule |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | sto11z 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I tried 3 betas of ios and then sold my iPhone and bought a Pixel, that's how disappointed I was from what I saw. |
|
| ▲ | llm_nerd 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Basically the vibe I get from it is that they think their users are dumb Your point would have been much more convincing had you refrained from this sort of pejorative assigning of motives. It wasn't necessary. I've been running the betas to the final release and there are a number of basic affordances and system improvements that are definitely worthwhile. I will not be going back. Having said that, while I know they had good intentions with this whole design, and probably really thought they were pursing a winner, what a massive, massive miss. This is such an aesthetic disaster that I'm just in awe. I feel like they had a huge push to do some seemingly substantial change, particularly on the mobile side, given the stumbles in the AI space, so they changed a lot of things maybe without quite enough thought. Ugly as hell. More dead space. On the mobile side they released an update to iOS just today from the RC a few days ago that removes some of the particularly stupid animations (the app tray did some dumb thing where it expanded and shrank, and that and a few similar things are gone). |
|
| ▲ | wilg 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've been running the RC and I have had no issues. Some of the design choices (sidebars particularly) are strange, but it's generally fine. I recommend not overcomplicating your life and just staying on the latest macOS. |
| |
| ▲ | kcplate 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | It took a day of getting used to it, but I have had no issues either. Some of the commentary on this thread seems overly critical to me, but you tend to see that on any Apple thread on HN. There’s stuff I like, some stuff I don’t, but in the end I’ll adapt. I think sime people just hate change. I am convinced that some folks complaining here will be complaining when MacOS 28 comes out and changes some OS 26 feature they have grown to like. |
|
|
| ▲ | josteink 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > The new UI is so incredibly ugly I honestly cannot understand how they thought it was acceptable to even released as a beta let alone an RC and now release. I just tried it and maybe I've just been primed by the internet, but by god, I did not like it. The side-bar design is terrible and lots of application (Maps, Music, etc) always look like they have a window overlapping the current application. So even with a single window open, my desktop already looks messy. For people like me, with a slight OCD about certain details (don't talk to me about notification-bubbles), this is absolutely infuriating. I'll disable auto-updates on all iDevices and Macs, and just keep on security-updates for previous gen OS as long as I can. Eww. |
|
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | eboynyc32 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Eh. I like it. Seems more modern. Who cares as long as it’s not windows. |
|
| ▲ | throwawaylaptop 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I float around the VC world in SF. Several of the women that work for VCs in decent positions don't know how to maximize a window on the MacBooks. |
|
| ▲ | 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |