| ▲ | Tesla Roadster(tesla.com) |
| 243 points by shekhar101 2 hours ago | 262 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | mullingitover an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| So this is a completely obvious scam, right? I don't see anyone else calling this out and I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. The thing that they showed off isn't something that they could legally sell, it would basically be a bomb. Also, the battery pack that would go in the car would be so large that they couldn't do the stunts they showed in their drone vehicle. Are we not calling an obvious stock pumping charade what it is out of some sense of politeness? |
| |
| ▲ | WheelsAtLarge 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | My big question is, would anyone want one? It's an interesting life size hotwheels car but who would want one other than to show at a monster truck rally. Talk about missing the mark by a mile... | |
| ▲ | j4k0bfr 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I feel like it's also crazy irresponsible to sell this deathtrap to the public, since it's pretty much guaranteed buyers will joyride this on public roads. - The cold-gas only version will shotgun debris into onlookers, and possibly yeet anyone behind it. - Active suction is very cool until a rock punches through your intakes. - Lithium batteries and pressurised tanks in the same package, yippee! Thank god it'll take them years to manufacture this thing. | | |
| ▲ | javascriptfan69 a few seconds ago | parent | next [-] | | They're not selling this to the public. They'll make a handful that a select few billionaires will get to keep in a hanger somewhere for bragging rights. There's a reason we don't see a driver in these demos and they don't do anything beyond very choreographed stunts. There's no way a human can actually control those thrusters in a way that doesn't kill you. Unless you're a maybe fighter pilot. | |
| ▲ | zdragnar 5 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | It isn't being sold to the public. Of the three versions, the one that is "road ready" doesn't have the gimmicky thrusters. The one that is displayed is available by invite only, and even if you have a quarter of a million to reserve the racing model, you aren't likely to get a license plate for use on public roads. |
| |
| ▲ | Nition 32 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I suppose at least we can say there is a working car that seems to be able to actually do the things as advertised, which is more than one could ever say for e.g. the Moller Skycar. | |
| ▲ | billfor 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Well we could examine the history here, for instance when he bought Twitter that it would immediately collapse (now its more popular than ever and Bluesky is the one that's falling apart) and when the Cybertruck was announced there were lots of people saying it could never be made: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21602437 | | |
| ▲ | 40four 3 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It’s crazy how many Cybertrucks I see in my hometown, and I don’t live in that big of a city. They are incredibly popular. This car will be incredibly popular to. Peoples are getting bent out of shape about the “thrust” and “rocket” variants, but who cares? Those will be few and far between. For rich collectors mostly. How about just the base model? It looks wild, I’m sure it will be fun as hell to drive. They are going to sell a ton of these things. |
| |
| ▲ | tiku an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Well I see no numbers saying how long it will fly. Perhaps it "hops", could easily see that happening with a burst of air below the car. (While standing still, accelerating the car upwards for 1 second with a burst of air) | | | |
| ▲ | mlindner 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think calling it a scam is a crazy thing to say. Tesla has never not (eventually) shipped a product they said they would . Also yes you can legally sell it. Whether you can legally operate it is a different question. | | |
| ▲ | otterley 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | May I remind you of the promised 90 second battery swap…13 years ago? https://youtu.be/Oj6LaYFall4?si=RGE8mbZQFdElq0sq | |
| ▲ | m463 6 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There are a long list of cars that have not-really-legal abilities. The corvette ZR-1 had a special key that would unlock all the performance. I don't think it met emissions when unlocked. Lots of newer muscle cars have performance modes and dragstrip modes that you shouldn't use. Even other teslas, like model 3 performance and model s plaid have have track mode and dragstrip mode that shouldn't be used on public streets. | |
| ▲ | charlesabarnes 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The roadster hasn't shipped after 9 years. Including a referral program for preorders. I find it incredibly more insane to be trusting of this | |
| ▲ | seabrookmx 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The second generation Roadster (reservations for which opened in 2017) literally is the product they didn't ship. Also Cybercab. How many Optimus robots are out in the wild? It is a scam, 100%. | |
| ▲ | billfor 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | He actually says in the video that it might not be legal to operate but they could still sell you one. Anything is legal off-road on your own private property. | | |
| ▲ | ygjb 31 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, once you leave the ground you aren't on your property anymore. | | |
| |
| ▲ | alasdair_ 32 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | He took preorders for the roadster nine years ago. It never shipped. | |
| ▲ | bakies 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | this is a new roadster, the previous roadster hasnt sold a unit |
| |
| ▲ | adocomplete an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I mean is it ever actually being released? probably not. Was it a an amazing demo? yes. | |
| ▲ | sailfast an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you wanted another pretext to merge Tesla and SpaceX this would be a good way. The existing tech fab plus this car maybe makes it harder to sue once the merger happens - but he will still be sued. “Look we’re making it rocket cars with AI of course we should be one company” | | |
| ▲ | estearum 41 minutes ago | parent [-] | | A pretext that convinces the most credulous people on the planet. Clever guy this Musk. |
| |
| ▲ | leesec 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What are you talking about re: the battery pack? | |
| ▲ | speg an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That’s why it’s invite only. | |
| ▲ | tdhz77 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I was #12 Tesla Roadster owner. I spoke across the country with my father. We drove from coast to coast in 2014 at a time when there was a lot of doubt. — I supported elons “mission” and now we know it’s a neo Nazi front of a company. This company and Elon has been a scam since he stole JB Straubel. How do I know? JB Straubel is my father. | | |
| ▲ | jacquesm 29 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I can't make soup of this. Your dad is a billionaire and you're left to fend for yourself? That's got to be some story. | | | |
| ▲ | matt-attack 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Neo Nazi? Seems a bit much. | | |
| ▲ | otterley 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | If it talks about politics like a Nazi and salutes like a Nazi… | |
| ▲ | tdhz77 4 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Elon donates to white Christian fundamentalist. The largest donor in history to the Republican Party and does Nazi salutes. |
|
| |
| ▲ | sippingabonedry 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Did you have any thoughts on DropBox while you're at it? | | |
| ▲ | akerl_ 13 minutes ago | parent [-] | | This is an especially interesting comment given that it misunderstands the Dropbox comment in the common way. |
| |
| ▲ | espeed an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | When I searched for Tesla on YouTube at the start of the event, the first live event returned was this, an AI generated Tesla presentation with Elon telling users to send bitcoin and he'll send you back double as a promotional event like an X Money thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5EDp2rEbFA. The QR code went to this site: https://roadster.tv. I reported it to YouTube. | | | |
| ▲ | jrflo 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think it’s real, the “invite only” version could probably do the kickflip over the semis, but would probably completely exhaust the tanks and require special equipment to refill or take hours with an onboard pump. And the flip is certainly a scripted stunt, not something you’d actually be able to do live. The math doesn’t seem to be completely unreasonable as a one off demo | | |
| ▲ | al_borland 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | They said there is a compressor to re-pressurize the tanks while driving. It made it sound like a power-up in a video game. You can't use it all the time, but if you wait for it to charge up, use it as many times as you want. I think the bigger issue with be making it street legal. Kickflipping over traffic, and refusing visibility for everyone to 0 in the process, can't be good. For closed courses, movies, etc it's really cool. |
| |
| ▲ | phyzix5761 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | China has had flying cars since 2023 so I don't see how this is a scam. The flying mechanism is unique for the Roadster so that's still to be seen how it would perform out in public. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZpQZSBTi7k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2c-B3y7yGQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fU5viDOjWLw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSjXf7IUSDw | | |
| ▲ | crummy an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | wow i did not realise this. are there videos of these flying cars? can you buy them? | | | |
| ▲ | TheDong an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I mean, Tesla demoed, promised, and took reservation money for a roadster reboot that _also_ didn't contain any technology China didn't have in 2017, and at this point they still haven't delivered on that and it feels safe to call it a scam. Just because the technology is technically feasible doesn't mean that a specific company is not scamming you when they promise it. And Tesla already has enough of a history of fake promises (your tesla will be a self-driving robotaxi earning money while you sleep within a few years, FSD will take you across the country while you sleep by next year, humanoid robots, the new roadster is taking reservations now and will deliver soon, regulation is the only thing holding up FSD, etc etc). | | |
| ▲ | phyzix5761 41 minutes ago | parent [-] | | To be fair the main reason why FSD hasn't been a wide spread thing is mostly due to local regulations. The technology exists and performs fairly well. FSD is allowed in pretty much all the same cities Waymo is allowed to operate so we can see from this that its a regulatory issue not a technological one. |
| |
| ▲ | m4ck_ an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I mean it looks cool but considering they haven't produced any of the other Roadster models in any meaningful quantity, and have repeatedly come up short on much more reasonable product offerings... Idk I have just the slightest doubt about a flying electric car hitting the market any time soon. Hasn't it been nearly a decade since the promise of a software update that would turn your Tesla into a self-driving taxi that can earn money while you're not using it? | |
| ▲ | bakies 33 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | none of these are videos of flying cars |
|
|
|
| ▲ | synapsomorphy an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Ok, so it actually flies. That was unexpected. It's an incredible engineering achievement to build in massive fans and rocket engines into a high performance car. It's truly wild. It's being sold in two modes. One with cold gas (no combustion) seemingly just for extra forwards acceleration (no flying) and one with real combustion rocket engines, the latter was in the video and is "invite only". Wild that they devoted so much effort to an economically completely infeasible model. I wonder if the combustion version will even break 3 figures sales. Even just the cold gas variant seems like a nightmare for production, there's a high pressure COPV in that thing and that's gonna make crashes much more.. exciting, and Tesla doesn't have a great record anyways. But very few of these are ever getting sold anyways. |
| |
| ▲ | jcheng 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Reading https://www.tesla.com/roadster, it seems like both variants only use cold gas thrusters, and the difference is that the "normal" (lol) one only has them pointed rearwards while the flying one has them pointed in all different directions as well. | | |
| ▲ | jacquesm 22 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I'm sure having a cold gas thruster is going to be no problem at all for road approval. /s |
| |
| ▲ | delichon an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > kinda wild they devoted this much effort to an economically completely infeasible model. Watch Ford v Ferrari for an idea of what auto companies are willing to invest for bragging rights. | | |
| ▲ | estearum 40 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Ford and Ferrari aren’t on the brink of extinction | | |
| ▲ | dboreham 10 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Tesla's stock price might be detached from reality, but is their actual business in trouble? I ask because anywhere I travel (Europe, UK, HK, NZ for example) there are just tons of Teslas, most of them the latest refresh models. There were more Telsas than BYD in Hong Kong! |
|
| |
| ▲ | billfor 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I thought somewhere in the video they said that it is just regular compressed air that is held in a tank, and that the car itself has a compressor and regenerates the compressed air over time. Obviously to stabilize that amount of weight the gas has to be ejected at such a high rate it is practically frozen at the nozzle outlet, but it is still just regular air. | |
| ▲ | casualscience an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's cool as fuck but calling it flying is misleading. It jumps and can maneuver in space. | | | |
| ▲ | js2 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > and one with real combustion rocket engines The site states it's cold-gas thrusters for both models: "Features a multi-mode suction system paired with cold-gas thrusters positioned around the perimeter of the vehicle that support forward and upward acceleration as well as lateral rotational movement." | |
| ▲ | pastel8739 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | to be fair we don’t actually know yet that this is a high performance car. We only saw it drive a few mph without rocket assistance | | |
| ▲ | synapsomorphy an hour ago | parent [-] | | Good point. It can't have much battery. Also wonder if the propellant/s are cryogenic. Monopropellant? You could tell from analyzing the plume. |
| |
| ▲ | hatthew an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's very economically feasible if it pumps up the stock price | |
| ▲ | gizajob an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don’t want to jinx this today, but one of these is so going flying into someone’s house and land on their bed. Likely within days of it being released into the wild. | |
| ▲ | alasdair_ 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | It doesn’t actually fly. Elon claims it will, but it won’t. Elon lies constantly. Any “demo” they produce, isn’t a real demo - it’s just fake. |
|
|
| ▲ | afavour 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Looks like a sensible turning down of the Cybertruck aesthetic into something that looks good. That said, the production issues with the Cybertruck mean you’d be a fool to reserve one of these. Let others do it, find out how late it arrives, what glued panels fall off at speed and wait for the inevitable recalls. Tesla has torched their engineering reputation lately and this page is making a lot of promises about revolutionary things. |
| |
| ▲ | gopalv an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > what glued panels fall off The Lotus Elise was famously glued together instead of welds. The original Roadster also had the same innards. This is clearly not a car for someone who wants to go from A to B, but a lot of Tesla components gets binned together for the next iteration of the cheaper car because they always order too many of them. Oddly enough this makes their cheaper cars more reliable than the expensive ones (think about the Audis right when Ferdinand Piech took over Lamborgini). | | |
| ▲ | majormajor an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Oddly enough this makes their cheaper cars more reliable than the expensive ones That's pretty standard. An M3 has long pushed the tolerances of things in the engine more than a base-model 3 series. An S-class has more whiz-bang-hope-it-still-works-in-ten-years stuff than a C-class. A Lexus has more going on than a boring base Corolla. |
| |
| ▲ | nradov an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This type of vehicle isn't intended to drive at speed, at least not very far. It's targeted at collectors who will park it in a garage with their other supercars. It's a status symbol with wheels, not transportation or even a toy for track days. (And I don't mean that as a criticism, there's nothing wrong with wealthy people buying collectibles.) | | |
| ▲ | alasdair_ 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | It’s not premium enough for collectors. I could see plenty of tech people buying one as a daily driver that they also take to the track though. | |
| ▲ | luqtas an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > (And I don't mean that as a criticism, there's nothing wrong with wealthy people buying collectibles.) there's a whole lot of systemic issues with wealthy people buying low-poly cars to their collection. |
| |
| ▲ | jbm an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Everyone is talking about the Cybertruck, but both the 3 and the Y have plenty of engineering problems as well. I believe both cars are listed as below-average reliability by CR. Worse, there are no 3rd parties producing cheaper suspension parts, so your old Model 3 is going to have to spend 2000-3000$ on an yearly basis until you get sick of fixing the suspension. Tesla claims to have fixed the issue on newer models (and apparently they did a lot of work on the suspension), but they don't really take responsibility for their old cars so I doubt they will take responsibility when their design causes problems for you. I do enjoy driving my 2019 SR+ Model 3, but I hate when people do the whole "Well on first principles, EVs have less parts so they are more reliable..." thing. My Toyota Sienna has been far more reliable than the Model 3, despite having many, many more parts. | | |
| ▲ | motionlessveloc an hour ago | parent [-] | | Early Model 3/Ys built in the US were unreliable. The ones built in Shanghai, though, are excellent. Berlin is somewhere in the middle. FWIW, I'm into my fourth year of (Chinese-built) Model 3 ownership and it's been rock solid, the only services so far were to replace the air filter and wipers. |
| |
| ▲ | doginasuit an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That was my first thought, Cybertruck: The Car. But then it drove up a wall and stopped on the ceiling and flew down. That was awesome. I'm sure it will be a nightmare to own. | |
| ▲ | combobyte an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > glued panels fall off at speed Given some of the tauted 'features' of this thing, I'd be more concerned about it blowing up in my driveway. | | | |
| ▲ | rgbrenner an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | at least the CyberTruck shipped. 9 years since the announcement of Roadster v2, people who paid 50k deposits are still waiting. Time to up the promises, and ask for more $50k deposits for v3! | |
| ▲ | NewsaHackO an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | A lot of haters of Tesla on HN I see, I guess you all are trying everything to malalign Tesla and see what sticks. | | |
| ▲ | estearum an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Tesla's most recent project was the largest flop in automotive history lol. | | |
| ▲ | mrheosuper an hour ago | parent [-] | | You mean Cybertruck? Hate it or not, there are bigger flops in automotive history. The history is long and broad. | | |
| ▲ | pseudosavant an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Not many. Elon said their plan was to produce 500k per year and they did less than 5% (15k) of that over the last year. Their installed production capacity is 125k. The Ford Edsel is widely regarded as one of the greatest car flops of all time and it sold 60k cars per year for their 2-year production run. The CyberTruck is a massively bigger flop than that. | |
| ▲ | estearum 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Name a few that you think are bigger and by what metric you think so. I doubt any program has lost the $1 to $1.5 billion that Cybertruck is reasonably estimated to have lost. And that’s including their quarter where SpaceX bought like 20% of their production for definitely-totally-legitimate-reasons. | |
| ▲ | bdangubic an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | definitely not biggest flop but it has by far the biggest hype-to-flop ratio. |
|
| |
| ▲ | henrikschroder an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The latest car Tesla released, the cybertruck, was one of the biggest automotive flops ever, production is essentially halted, demand is non-existant. Tesla announced and started taking reservations for their roadster TEN YEARS AGO. People who made reservations and paid the $50k-$250k cost are STILL WAITING. And now Tesla has announced yet another vapourware car, with a controversial design, taking reservation money again. If you fall for this, you are a fool. | |
| ▲ | LastTrain an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don’t hate Tesla, I do think their leader is a Nazi Saluting prick though. You like him? | | |
| ▲ | mjmsmith an hour ago | parent [-] | | I don't hate Tesla either. I'm actually a bit disappointed knowing that I will never consider buying one for the rest of my life. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | aresant an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This was 100% precursor to the absorption of Tesla into SpaceX and I’m here for it https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/tesla-spac... |
| |
| ▲ | wnmurphy 12 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | This would be a horrible deal for Tesla investors. Long-term investors would lose about 40% of their investment to subsidize the inflated valuation of X (bought by xAI), the inflated valuation of xAI (bought by SpaceX), and SpaceX (whose valuation is based on the assumption that demand for inference is effectively unlimited, and that everyone will prefer hardware in space over Earth). The valuation of both companies was inflated prior to acquisition, and Tesla shareholders will be asked to dilute their investment by absorbing that cumulative inflation. Not even to mention that Musk would have exclusive control over the entire conglomerate, with not even the pretense of a Board to check his power. When even Steven Mark Ryan is like "let's pump the breaks a little bit," you know it's bad. | |
| ▲ | hiitsmyaccount an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes, let's combine Twitter, an AI company, and a space company with a solar company, car company, battery company, and robotics company, so that we can have one huge valuation that can't be possibly delivered upon and losses will be absorbed for a short period. What could go wrong? | | |
| ▲ | gizajob an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Japanese companies manage fine doing this kind of thing. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Do they have a gigantic tumor like twitter and Space AI slapped on the side? If all of the products were profitable it would work. | | |
| ▲ | wnmurphy 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm glad someone else gets it. | |
| ▲ | gizajob 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don’t have time to look up whatever Masayoshi Son has wasted a few billion dollars on today, but yes kinda. |
| |
| ▲ | AlotOfReading an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | What about Tesla's management style would you call Japanese? | | |
| ▲ | gizajob 38 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I’m highlighting that companies can and do have all kinds of departments doing seemingly unrelated things if they want to. | | |
| ▲ | AlotOfReading 9 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I'm pointing out that Japanese companies can do that because they're organized and managed like Japanese companies. Tesla is not, and in fact lacks pretty much all the organizing characteristics and long term planning that enables keiretsu to function. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | killbot5000 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Tesla-Yutani | |
| ▲ | burnerRhodov3 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | but... All elon companies. More valuable bundled, because all the elon lovers don't have to pick where they throw their tithes. I'd love it even more if they throw in a tunnel construction and a human brain implant company in the mix while they are at it. | |
| ▲ | fnordpiglet an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | It would almost be as big a monstrosity as Amazon |
|
|
|
| ▲ | delichon 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The livestream has the stunts: https://x.com/Tesla/status/2110788059008819215 |
| |
|
| ▲ | FabHK an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There are three configurations: - Performance: road ready, seats two, active aero and a “multi-mode suction system.” 0-60 mph in under 1.6 seconds. Available by reservation. - Thrust: race ready, seats two, adds rear-mounted cold-gas thrusters. 0-60 mph in under 0.9 seconds. Limited release. - Rocket: seats one, adds thrusters around the perimeter of the car for upward and rotational movement. 0-60 mph in under 0.59 seconds and a top speed of over 230 mph. Invite only. Per Electrek: https://electrek.co/2026/10/15/tesla-unveils-cyberfied-new-r... |
| |
|
| ▲ | okdood64 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Okay that's one of the coolest things I've seen in a while since the rockets landing. Car looks half decent too. |
| |
| ▲ | esperent an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > Car looks half decent too To me it looks like a mashup of a Ferrari and a Cybertruck. That's not a good thing. | | |
| ▲ | eclipticplane an hour ago | parent [-] | | Same; there are stylish super cars... this again looks like a 5 year old kid drawing like the Cybertruck does. |
| |
| ▲ | doublerabbit 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not really. Looks like junk to me. | | |
| ▲ | okdood64 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I like the fun retro look, similar to the N Vision 74 [1]. This actually has some taste unlike the Cybertruck. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyundai_N_Vision_74 | | |
| ▲ | jchw an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I really wonder why I think the N Vision 74 looks so much better; it just has more personality somehow. I do agree though that the new Roadster looks a lot less bad than the Cybertruck. | |
| ▲ | doublerabbit an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'd agree with you and merit the design has more thought as an upgrade to the look of the cybertruck. However it still looks like something to be left in a scrap heap of a destruction derby within Tron. Dislike the design, look and edge of it. Feels cold. Each to their own. |
|
| |
| ▲ | johnnyApplePRNG 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What price did you buy TSLA at? | | |
| ▲ | gexla an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I guess you didn't see the video of a car sitting on a ramp upside down, doing flips in the air, jumping over a semi and other cars... Odd world we live in when we don't see that as being cool. But, we're seemingly headed there. At some point, it's going to be hard to imagine something that could surprise me. | | |
| ▲ | iugtmkbdfil834 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | << I guess you didn't see the video of a car sitting on a ramp upside down, doing flips in the air, jumping over a semi and other cars... It is weird. I am not fan of Musk, but one has to have some crazy blinders on not to give him credit here. << At some point, it's going to be hard to imagine something that could surprise me. It is hard to believe your eyes -- I assumed it was magnetic or something initially. | | |
| ▲ | wnmurphy 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > I am not fan of Musk, but one has to have some crazy blinders on not to give him credit here. Tesla does have ~700k other employees. | |
| ▲ | dozerly an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Other demos, like the humanoid robot one, were entirely fake so wouldn’t be surprised. | | |
| ▲ | dawnerd an hour ago | parent [-] | | Also wouldn't be that crazy for them to put together a demo that'll never actually be a production vehicle. Dunno why anyone thinks this will ever ship like this. One thing to market a car, another to just show off features that just wont be real. |
| |
| ▲ | doublerabbit an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | >> It is weird. I am not fan of Musk, but one has to have some crazy blinders on not to give him credit here. For what? For an unpractical vehicle that now has the ability to launch and crush another car? If said to be true. As if driving wasn't already dangerous and stupid enough. If he would show maturity for a change rather than his childhood antics then I would give him credit. | | |
| ▲ | iugtmkbdfil834 an hour ago | parent [-] | | << If he would show some and maturity for a change rather than his childhood antics then I would give him credit. Man only manages to coordinate an engineering feat and your response is "why can he not offer something responsible like a lightly breaded toast"? Beyond the obvious part where I say that his antics are part of the product demonstration ( roadster is space moment being another notable moment ), is your objection truly that he didn't come to the podium with a clipboard and say: "
Begin communication
- it jumps
- it go up upside down
- it can go 0-60 in 1 sec
End of communication." Fuck man. Where has your wonder gone? | | |
| ▲ | joquarky 26 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Hard to have wonder about billionaire toys when I have to choose between medicine and food. | | |
| ▲ | iugtmkbdfil834 17 minutes ago | parent [-] | | This is a real question and not a bait: if you are that hard pressed.. why are you here arguing with a rando over billionaire toys and not securing medicine and/or food? |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | throwayay58373 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | The HN crowd isn't what it used to be. Technology doesn't excite most people here anywhere. | | |
| ▲ | chrisstanchak an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Yea a bunch of lamers. Bring back the hackers. | |
| ▲ | justinhj an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Politics comes first. If you are on the naughty list you will be bullied until you submit to the allowed thoughts. | |
| ▲ | bigyabai an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Technology Panem et circenses | |
| ▲ | raddan an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I know you’re using a throwaway account but in case you come back to read this: we’re all tired of being scammed. Virtually every hot tech company now routinely overpromises and underdelivers. Some products are scams; some products kind of work but at great personal risk to oneself and others. The future we are excited about is one where technology SOLVES ACTUAL PROBLEMS. |
|
| |
| ▲ | okdood64 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Nah, this ain't it chief. I own exactly 0 directly. Too volatile and don't really care for Teslas at all. I love my gas cars. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | etothet 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I watched the ~16 minute presentation on YouTube and it was as if Elon and the two other guys presenting were doing a skit at a talent show. They seemed extremely unprepared. Maybe they were intentionally trying to come across as off the cuff, but it felt unnatural and cringey. Together they have the charisma of a paper clip. These guys are so full of themselves that it’s difficult to appreciate whatever accomplishment this may or may not be. And, of course, no
way it will be street legal with air thrusters. What a complete joke. |
| |
| ▲ | al_borland 2 minutes ago | parent [-] | | When presenting the world with a flying car, one doesn't need much extra charisma, the demo does it all. I think most people would be pretty excited (or full of themselves) knowing what they were about to show. |
|
|
| ▲ | pbohun an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Okay, that's some of the most impressive feats I've ever seen. Congratulations to the engineers! |
|
| ▲ | gcanyon 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Anyone know the physics of mach diamonds purely from compressed gas? I'm not a physicist, but I thought one of the key aspects of compressed gas is that it can't expand faster than the speed of sound in that gas -- the speed of sound is literally the limit to how fast it can expand? |
|
| ▲ | glimshe an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I could have used that when leaving Costco last Saturday. |
|
| ▲ | Keyframe an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Production and other realities aside, I've seen some cool shit in my life and this demo is high up there! Did you guys catch 0.5 mach target top speed? That's 600kmh. It'd better do that flying because there probably aren't any rubber tyres that could endure that before exploding within seconds. |
|
| ▲ | zbrozek 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Can this be scaled down to a Roomba? Then it would both be more useful at picking stuff up off the floor, and able to recover from falling down the stairs. |
| |
|
| ▲ | tekacs an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The fact that the one that can fly is invite-only makes me wonder if there would be ITAR issues with the guidance mechanisms that they have to put into it. I'm not saying that there aren't lower hanging fruit reasons why they wouldn't make more of those, but you can see how the guidance necessary to make this move the way that it does could be dual use. |
| |
| ▲ | viraptor 35 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I suspect it's more because some rando could actually try to use it in public space. The invite only means they could send it to people who will give them good PR, are known not to be idiots, and can be invited to sign many responsibility disclaimers. | | |
| ▲ | tekacs 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | That makes a ton of sense, yes! To be honest, I was wondering less about their reasons for invite-only and more about whether this kind of gentle and precise guidance with cold gas thrusters might hit ITAR. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dmix an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The suction and air recovery part might be forward thinking for how we design roads or tunnels. They might not all need to be flat. Especially when autonomous. |
| |
| ▲ | clintonb 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | So the CyberCab will drive on the ceiling of the Boring Company’s tunnel? | | |
| ▲ | dmix 23 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Definitely not upside down, I was thinking of short inclines, possible as a sort of tunnel bypass. Assuming all the cars are networked for mechanical failures and the batteries can handle it. But that's only after the 5 minutes I spent considering the idea and mostly stolen from I Robot movie like most of Tesla's ideas. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | still-learning 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Genuinely impressed, incredible demo |
|
| ▲ | vladdoster 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| aka a $245,000 loan to tesla with no interest for 10 years |
| |
| ▲ | pseudosavant an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | They first started taking deposits on the Roadster 9 years ago in 2017 with a 2020 production date. It’ll be shocking if they ever sell this car they showed today. If they do, it’ll be many years late, not fly, and cost twice what they are saying. Just like the CyberTruck. | |
| ▲ | treesknees an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | The one that doesn’t fly is only a $45,000 loan |
|
|
| ▲ | nhinck2 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Good on Elon for putting out a car that embodies his best trait, sucking as hard as possible. |
| |
|
| ▲ | george_max 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is an incredible feat of engineering. I have my doubts of the 2028 mass production timeline, but I am quite amazed. |
|
| ▲ | iugtmkbdfil834 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Been a while since I was impressed with a tech presentation. I was waiting for a clear case of AI assisted movement ( though I personally expected to see it for the first time in a military chopper ). ** Side note, as I was looking for the right stream, youtube gave me a link to a different deep fake 'Musk' stream where he extolled virtues of sending him money ( https://roadster-tesla.com/#participate ). Everything has changed man. I am sure the scammer actually got some people. |
|
| ▲ | gtirloni an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > It challenges the limits of design, engineering and physics to deliver an expertly crafted extra-terrestrial vehicle. closed tab. thanks. |
|
| ▲ | fivedogcity an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The real feat would be to actually ship the gas-equipped models. The on-stage demonstration was certainly quite impressive but handling real world terrain is a whole different story. Not to mention compensating for drivers who will skew lead-footed without any experience of handling a third dimension. I am skeptical that this feature will prove to be much more than a publicity stunt, especially since the availability of these models will be so limited. |
|
| ▲ | dualvariable 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I mean, this is the gimmicky of gimmicks for the ultra-rich. It just means you can do jumps and stunts programmed into the vehicle at the push of a button with zero skill at being a stunt driver. The Dukes of Hazzard had to do that without the thrusters. Can't wait to see how people kill themselves and other people with those things by being stupid... Hopefully that shit gets blocked by the DOT and kept off public roads--which is probably the goal to get a bunch of drooling simps outraged over "government overreach" keeping them away from their "flying cars". |
| |
|
| ▲ | 4d4m 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I dig the commitment to the low poly look! Really cool and fits in with the new design direction. |
|
| ▲ | jesse_faden an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've been recently playing a game called Approximately Up. You start from simple building blocks, thrusters and can use the in game logic system to build complex controls. One of the things I came about to learn was something to make a hover system for my ship was a simple PID controller. The side and bottom firing thrusters just remind me of my ship in the game. While the game is oversimplified and a bit arcadey, does anyone know what actually goes into this in the real life and is the huge feat the improvement on the weight of the whole car? |
|
| ▲ | salamandars an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The video goes against my intuition for how much performance you can get out of cold gas thrusters. I wonder if someone could do some back of the envelope maths on how much thrust and impulse you can get from a setup like this? My primary scepticism is how much the prototype weighs, and whether it can still jump with 2 passengers + 1000kg of batteries inside. |
| |
| ▲ | tristanj an hour ago | parent [-] | | Based on the statement that the suction fan generates 2g of downforce, and the telemetry showing the fan operating at 4,700 kg @ ~95% load, the vehicle weighs approximately 2,300 to 2,500 kg. |
|
|
| ▲ | vagab0nd an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I never thought I'd live to see K.I.T.T |
|
| ▲ | DeepYogurt 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Tesla hitting their lambo era? |
|
| ▲ | alexpadula an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Flying cars before GTA6. |
|
| ▲ | ceroxylon 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The rocket flip part looks like CGI, in my opinion. I get the same feeling as when I see CGI on some random B movie. Would be happy to be proven wrong if there was a crowd of people filming from their angle though. Also "Beyond The Limits of Physics"... would any actual engineers at Tesla/SpaceX agree with that marketing statement? |
| |
|
| ▲ | Rebelgecko 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is the copy grok's writing style? It feels inhuman but still more readable than Opus |
|
| ▲ | reenorap an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| So it can fly? Just like we will have 1 million robotaxis on the streets by 2021? EDIT: wow it really can fly, that is crazy |
|
| ▲ | gonzalohm an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What's up with wheels not being round anymore? How is that supposed to work? I understand it for Formula 1, but for real world driving, it doesn't make any sense |
|
| ▲ | dataking an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Rocket-inspired design hints at desire to merge Tesla and SpaceX? |
|
| ▲ | djeastm an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I must be old. I just keep thinking about what kind of whiplash I'd get with those flips |
|
| ▲ | LeoPanthera 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If this is real, it's going to kill people. |
|
| ▲ | dmix 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Other thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50112380 |
|
| ▲ | Aeolun 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| At least this one doesn't look horrible. I can't see myself buying it, but I don't feel like I want to gag either. |
|
| ▲ | tiku an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| So they are going to send one of to space again? |
|
| ▲ | phyzix5761 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It can fly? Wow! What a time to be alive! |
|
| ▲ | dbg31415 16 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Relevant. * The Fastest Maze-Solving Competition On Earth - YouTube // https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMQbHMgK2rw |
|
| ▲ | portmanteur an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As a father of a growing family, I am still waiting for the RoBovan. |
|
| ▲ | sailfast an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Nice Testarossa! |
|
| ▲ | kwisatzh an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A car that jumps - am I missing something? The speed numbers are cool. |
|
| ▲ | nilsbunger an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Are they serious about the rocket version?? |
|
| ▲ | est an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is that the Draco engine? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Draco |
| |
| ▲ | Geee an hour ago | parent [-] | | No, they're cold gas thrusters. The car has an air compressor, a composite overwrapped pressure vessel (COPV) and 10 nozzles. |
|
|
| ▲ | phyzix5761 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The engineering team did an amazing job! |
| |
| ▲ | joquarky 11 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Great, now how about putting some of those amazing engineering brain cells into solving the impending water crisis. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | combobyte 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Our multi-mode fan and ground sealing system acts as a downforce generator, pulling air out from beneath the vehicle. This provides enough suction to hold the vehicle upside down, even when stationary. Bullshit, no it can't. > Advanced cold-gas thrusters use all-electric actuators to offer precise thrust, completing micro adjustments within a fraction of a second. This helps stabilize the vehicle in flight. In flight? What? Did I miss the joke, or what? It's a fucking car... The image even shows it hovering off the ground. How is this not blatant false advertising? ETA: okay, skimmed some of the livestream. These is absolutely no way that any of these features will ever be part of a production model. People get serious whiplash injuries just from being rear-ended at low speed. What do they think is going to happen to the occupant when they tell their car to jump over a semi and do a fucking barrel roll? Seriously, what are we doing here? |
| |
| ▲ | gizajob an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Amazing such instant expertise. Watch the video - the car jumps into the air. Not exactly flight or what we’d consider a flying car, but it’s careering through the air off the ground. | |
| ▲ | blobbers 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's supposed to be funny. Or it's not? Really not sure. | |
| ▲ | td521534f12 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This isn't even the first car to demo holding and driving upside down using a ground effect fan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6LYcgaQ46c | |
| ▲ | rjsw an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There is another car [1] with a fan to improve downforce. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Murray_Automotive_T.50 | |
| ▲ | teddy__d 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Watch the livestream | |
| ▲ | gcanyon 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >> Our multi-mode fan and ground sealing system acts as a downforce generator, pulling air out from beneath the vehicle. This provides enough suction to hold the vehicle upside down, even when stationary. > Bullshit, no it can't. A proof of concept already exists: https://mcmurtry.com/upside-down-driving/ | |
| ▲ | foobazgt an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Bullshit, no it can't I mean, this isn't crazy. In fact, it's already been done. Ever heard of McMurtry? (https://mcmurtry.com/). They're notorious for exactly this - using fans to provide extreme downforce (urr... upforce if you're hanging upside down?). > In flight? Did you see the stunt where it literally flew over vehicles? I mean, maybe it's a bit closer to a controlled super-leap like the original Superman, but... yeah, my personal reaction to that was more "holy shit" than "well, that's not flying". | |
| ▲ | kulahan an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you scroll down on the page, it shows that the "rocket edition" is invite-only. Probably gonna sell it to a few friends in hopes that the 3-5 they make sell for millions down the road, so to speak. |
|
|
| ▲ | luckydata 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| At this point this is some sort of IQ test right? |
|
| ▲ | dyauspitr 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is this a gas that needs to be refilled with the cold thrust one? |
|
| ▲ | sawjet an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You can hate the man, but you must respect him. Flying cars have truly arrived. |
| |
|
| ▲ | zhangchioulin an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Very COOL, I like this Roadster retro style |
|
| ▲ | ambicapter an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is this a broken link for anyone else? |
|
| ▲ | chirau an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| So Elon's entities are really using SI instead of AI? Interesting. Or was he the one who actually suggested the name change to POTUS? |
| |
|
| ▲ | latentsea an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'd buy one for the police chases. Hell yes. Not that I'm in the billionaire invite-only inner circle, and not that they'll ever ship it. |
|
| ▲ | seabrookmx 41 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yay the (almost) 10th anniversary of the 2nd generation Roadster reservations, and now it's got fucking rockets apparently? How delusional are people? The emperor is not wearing clothes y'all. |
|
| ▲ | hristov an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| He has finally gone bonkers. Drugs are bad, mmmmkay. Imagine the engineer hours wasted on this gimmick, while he is losing market share everywhere. |
|
| ▲ | loveTech an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Unavailable to visit? |
|
| ▲ | macinjosh an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Sorry about the eggs honey, I had to use the thrusters to get past this cyclist. |
|
| ▲ | tdhz77 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Ai slop on a billion dollar company should tell you everything you know about how we are doomed by this ai experiment |
|
| ▲ | t1234s an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I cant wait to see what type of batshit crazy motorsport series they invent for these. |
|
| ▲ | NDlurker an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| "Tony Hawk would be called, we call that the kickflip." Uh what? Rodney Mullen invented the kickflip Reminds me of this
https://youtu.be/LC97wdQOmfI |
| |
| ▲ | niwtsol an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yes, Rodney Mullen invented the kickflip (and damn near every other skate trick), but the reference here comes from a time when Tony Hawk would drive around and yell "do a kickflip" at skaters, if they did a kickflip he would sometimes give them a signed board or other things. Example video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ob0dI05Xz8s - it became a thing for a little where people would yell "do a kickflip" at skaters they saw on the street. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | ofjcihen an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Reading some of this feels like I’m having a stroke. >This provides enough suction to hold the vehicle upside down, even when stationary. Neat car though. |
|
| ▲ | moralestapia 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Wow, this might be the most phenomenal tech demo I've ever watched. This is just amazing, congrats to everyone who worked on this. From an engineering pov, it must be the highlight of someone's life and a massive amount of fun to be able to work on a product like this. |
| |
|
| ▲ | Kuyawa 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Technology: spectacular, design: ugly as fuck |
|
| ▲ | phyzome an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Technically very impressive. I wonder if they'll actually produce and sell any of these. And too bad it's associated with a Nazi shitheel. That takes a lot of the joy out of this. |
|
| ▲ | i_love_retros an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Listen, if you rightfully believe Elon Musk is a white supremacist piece of shit who used his wealth to buy his way in to Trump's regime to steal huge amounts of data on the american public and who attempts to influence foreign democracies and who promotes far right conspiracies, please don't buy his fucking cars. |
|
| ▲ | johnnyApplePRNG 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Does musk get final say on all of the latest car designs? The cybertruck? And now this? Vomit inducing, truly. |
|
| ▲ | dozerly an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A lot of musk shills in these comments. This is a terrible idea, and just like all his other promises, won’t happen. |
| |
| ▲ | andrewchambers an hour ago | parent [-] | | I don't think people want to buy it - we just think its cool that its possible. You should try having fun and enjoying things once in a while... | | |
|
|
| ▲ | darksim905 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I absolutely detest the leadership and what he is actively doing to this country... but holy fucking shit. I want to reserve one, but when you're broke as a joke... ooph. |
|
| ▲ | sippingabonedry an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've never seen a site allegedly about technology, hate technology so much. Good luck with the food delivery apps fellas. |
| |
| ▲ | david927 an hour ago | parent [-] | | The technology is jaw-dropping, the engineering staggering, and this thread -- it's just embarrassing. I've been on HN since the beginning and I don't even recognize it anymore. | | |
| ▲ | holler a minute ago | parent [-] | | 2007?! you're a real OG. thanks for calling it out, it's been getting worse and worse. really a shame as this has been a daily staple for 10 years |
|
|
|
| ▲ | wilg 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I recommend everyone watch the live event video. It is a master class in everything you could possibly do wrong when producing a product reveal event. It's really amazing. It's like watching their rehearsal, and also like watching The Rehearsal. |
| |
| ▲ | kcb 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It was fine? I'd rather this than hyper rehearsed CGI human Apple launch video. At least its just real people talking like humans. | | |
| ▲ | gizajob an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah Apple really synthesising a platonic ideal of Steve’s product release smarm without any of his hubristic charm at this point. Tesla and SpaceX seem like humans just getting on with sh*t and onto the next. | |
| ▲ | wilg 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It was not fine. |
| |
| ▲ | dmix 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I can’t do a tech demo of a simple software feature on zoom without at least one thing messing up. They launched a car off a ramp live and were honest from the beginning of the stream it might not work. The last decade of social media has shown that humans care more about authenticity than perfection in presentations. | | |
| ▲ | wilg an hour ago | parent [-] | | It did work! The point is they did a terrible job of producing the event and being clear what they were talking about and showing the product. The product, for all four people who will be able to buy it ("invite only"), seems very cool. But that is not what I was commenting on! |
|
|
|
| ▲ | King-Aaron an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I hate Tesla for their politics, broken promises, and all the drama that we are all aware and tired of hearing about.
That being said, that was the coolest damn thing I've ever seen a car do. I don't think there's any doubt in anyone's mind that it'll never make production like this, but what I see as being demonstrated is a suborbital lander/off-world ground transport concept that can work in low gravity environments etc. This will aid autonomous delivery vehicles etc to be dropped from low orbit and find their own landing sites, and then drive to location. I wonder how many maimed kerbals are stranded around the space X facility while testing this. |
| |
| ▲ | j4k0bfr 36 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Very cool stuff but all the "extra-terrestrial" stuff is complete bunk. This thing wouldn't survive Max-Q, let alone any kind of landing that isn't on a clean slab of concrete. It's a cool rich person toy, no other notes. | | |
| ▲ | King-Aaron 34 minutes ago | parent [-] | | You miss my point. They're demonstrating a landing system, it's just wrapped up in a car to fool the idiots that are going to pre-purchase it again so they can use that money to build more space X technology. The car is just a façade. Edit: And to expand on this. Owners of GM T.50' say they can't use the ground effect fan anywhere in public due to the debris it picks up and throws, and are ineffective on anything but near perfect roads. So that's not impressive to me. And the jet boosters are also ridiculous, there is not real-world application where you could use them outside of completely closed environments with no one nearby. It's a huge investment into reaction thrusters for a car that would never, ever be used - unless it was to demonstrate thruster technology for another reason. i.e. Space X. |
| |
| ▲ | joquarky 6 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | What is this wonderful "autonomous delivery vehicle" capable of delivering? Also, assuming the delivery vehicle is destroyed at the end of each "delivery", what will it cost? |
|
|
| ▲ | ThalesX 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Pretty big nothingburger. Production starts 2028 and honestly, the taunted feature... it's not a flying car, it's a jumping car. Do people actually want this for themselves? I'd wager the valuation would go down after this presentation. |
| |
| ▲ | iugtmkbdfil834 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I never thought I would say this, but.. have you been like.. born 70 or something? | | | |
| ▲ | kingstnap an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Bro the car literally jumped over a semi like its the TF2 soldier. Nothingburger??? | | |
| ▲ | ThalesX 28 minutes ago | parent [-] | | OK sure. I don't have a lot of use cases in my day to day commute that would be better handled by this jumping over a semi like it's the TF2 soldier, hence, a big nothingburger. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | ijustlovemath an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Kind of disturbing how hard he's leaning into the futurism aesthetic here, given its history. |
| |
| ▲ | pastel8739 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Tesla has been doing this for a while, having all their promo shots at night etc. The terafab announcement stuff has an especially dystopian vibe | |
| ▲ | phyzome an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I mean, he also did a straight-up Nazi salute. We already know the guy is a fascist. |
|
|
| ▲ | maxnevermind an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I guess robotaxi is failing? This is my only explanation of that jumping gimmick. |
|
| ▲ | johnnyApplePRNG an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Still with the deadly door-handles that first responders can't open, I see. https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2025-tesla-dangerous-door... |
| |
| ▲ | kcb an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Yea, i was going to reserve one of these sub 1 sec 0-60 vehicles with rocket motors and suction fans, but then I didnt because of the ergonomics of the door handle design. | | |
| ▲ | phyzome an hour ago | parent [-] | | "Ergonomics" is an interesting phrase to use for "critical safety issue". But yeah, that's not the part of the vehicle that's gong to kill its first victim. |
| |
| ▲ | sippingabonedry an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you watched the video, which you didn't, you'd know it appears to have a traditional door latch with recessed handles. |
|
|
| ▲ | motionlessveloc an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Tesla has completely lost the plot at this point. Yes, the Model Y and 3 are still selling well today, but they increasingly can't compete with the Chinese on price or features. And instead of even trying to stay relevant in the consumer market, they're focusing on niche toys like the Cybertruck and now this. At this point Tesla's future hinges pretty much entirely on Cybercab and Optimus, and neither is looking great. |