| ▲ | slowin 3 hours ago |
| It's up to us, as tech workers to push back against this. I quit my job at Microsoft due to their complicity with Israeli war crimes and oppression (and certainly the US government was involved too). It's tough to leave a high paying job, but I feel good about it every single day. We don't have to be cogs in the MIC machine and we don't have to build systems that terrorize people. |
|
| ▲ | leonidasrup 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Microsoft has been participating in PRISM program (SIGAD US-984XN) since 2007. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM There are allegation that Microsoft changed Skype architecture (after buying Skype for $8.5 billion) to make wiretapping easier. "
In July last year, nine months after Microsoft bought Skype, the NSA boasted that a new capability had tripled the amount of Skype video calls being collected through Prism;
" https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-... |
| |
| ▲ | hi_im_greg_h an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | We should celebrate when people make ethical choices. Not berate them because they didn't make it sooner. | |
| ▲ | EA-3167 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | It’s genuinely amusing to see how and why people posture, as though working for MS prior to 2023 was somehow ethical. Your post arguably only scratches the surface too. I’ve concluded that most people care far more about appealing to the crowd than actually thinking by anything through. | | |
| ▲ | JoshTriplett an hour ago | parent [-] | | If you shame people for acting now rather than earlier, you discourage them from acting at all. Sometimes people aren't in a position to be secure enough to act. Sometimes different issues are more effective at resonating enough to break through previously cached unconsidered patterns of thought. Sometimes people don't know all the things that are going on, and act once they've learned about them. Whatever the reason, if your reaction is "took you long enough" rather than "welcome", you discourage people from acting. Don't punish the behavior you want to see more of. (Also, OP is not even an instance of what you're decrying; see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49647687 .) | | |
| ▲ | EA-3167 an hour ago | parent [-] | | I’m not interested in shaming people or crediting them for superficial performances. The entire premise is ridiculous, as if the companies people are working for are somehow ethical. You’re making money from venture capitalists and tech firms, MS, Meta, X, Google, etc… which of them is any better than MS? They’re all awful in different ways. | | |
| ▲ | JoshTriplett an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | You are dismissing people as superficial or performative when they are taking action according to their ethics. Have you considered the possibility that people are not, in fact, performing, and are just trying to be ethical? I can't tell if your actual goal here is to be dismissive of the entire concept of people caring about ethics, or if you don't think that quitting is an effective means of acting in concert with those ethics. If it's the latter, then I'd suggest that it's a start, not everyone is in the position to do even that much, and some people who do so will be able to go further. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good, particularly if someone is taking a step in the right direction. | | |
| ▲ | alpha_squared an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | A lesson I've had to learn is that, for some people, ethics is a paycheck. It can be incomprehensible to imagine someone acting against their own paycheck as a result. | | |
| ▲ | mitxela 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Capitalistic evolution selects for that people, so their numbers only increase. |
| |
| ▲ | EA-3167 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | You don’t have to repeat yourself, I understood your point originally, I simply disagree with both your premise and conclusions. I don’t have the same respect for people who preach “anti-Zionism” at every turn online, I’m not that gullible. | | |
| ▲ | 5upplied_demand 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | If quitting a job is "performative" what would you consider a "non-performative" act? Ironically, you are doing your own preaching in your comments. It could even be described as "performative." |
|
| |
| ▲ | sebzim4500 20 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's clearly not a superficial performance if you actually quit a high paying job. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | ricksunny an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Good on you. I left my post-university defense job after a year and a half. Of all career decisions, that's one I don't regret, and rather the regret I harbor was for joining in the first place (albeit did so under a combination of limited information & naivete). The 'will not' list in here I Just learned about today,
https://www.solzhenitsyncenter.org/live-not-by-lies
it easily maps to the employment situation question. |
|
| ▲ | monideas 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Well it's good you just left on your own accord, basically you fired yourself rather than wasting their time having to do it. There's an interesting dynamic with this in that the Chinese and Indian (and other foreign born/first gen immigrant) workers at big tech companies don't care about these things at all. There are some very intense ideological dynamics within big tech companies among the employee base but I always found it interesting that the foreign born employees did not care at all, they were just there to work. |
| |
| ▲ | trhway an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | whatever the motherland's ideology/propaganda had been telling, the first gen gets to firsthand witness/experience that it were lies. After that you become were critical/unbelieving to whatever propaganda and ideology, even if it is the right ideology and propaganda this time, is being fed to you. | |
| ▲ | PorciiVorbesc 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >There's an interesting dynamic with this in that the Chinese and Indian (and other foreign born/first gen immigrant) workers at big tech companies don't care about these things at all. Why do you think the elite business owning class wants to replace you with desperate and malleable foreign workers from countries where morals and human rights are suggestions at best? The other thing is, you built your nest egg taking Microsoft's "blood money" for a few years giving you the luxury to quit on a dime, but there's a lot of people on the planet or even in your country, wishing to do as you did. You can't just pull the ladder after you and expect everyone make the same sacrifice as you except without their own nest egg. If you want to start a moral and egalitarian society then what about a higher tax on the wealth of tech bros, to finance the lives of the non-tech bros to accept humane jobs? | | |
| ▲ | monideas 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | antonvs 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > They put their energy into their families instead of trying to derive meaning from political activism. It's useful that psychopaths always tell on themselves like this. | | |
| ▲ | monideas 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Putting energy into your family is generally the opposite of psychopathy, it's actually a good thing to do. On the other hand you can actually find a lot of psychopaths who find their outlet in political activism "The Dark Triad traits predict authoritarian political correctness and alt-right attitudes" https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7369609/ | | |
| ▲ | antonvs 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The psychopathic tell is dismissing political activism as "trying to derive meaning." It's right up there with the idea that moral or ethical claims are "performative". These kinds of claims generally come from people who don't feel any moral or ethical impulses. These people are most commonly malignant narcissists and psychopaths. A great example is Elon Musk who described empathy as a "bug". Morality is a fundamental feature for most humans. The people who make the kinds of claims above constitute a small, single digit percentage of the population. They tend to have an outsize influence though, because they exploit the trust of others to rise to positions of power, where their lack of compunction can be an advantage. People like Trump, Musk, and Thiel are canonical examples of this. Eventually, when their actions make things bad enough for everyone else, people tend to take action. We may be approaching a time like that. You acknowledged this yourself in earlier comments. | | |
| ▲ | matheusmoreira 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | There are many things I consider to be deeply immoral that I nevertheless cannot change. My political activism is merely performative. Power and wealth are already so entrenched I think we have little chance of effecting any lasting change without violence. So either I become a literal terrorist, or I enable Daniel Plainview mode. It seems to me like the rational move is to try to get rich by any means necessary so I can fuck off to somewhere isolated and never have to deal with the rotten society I hate ever again. | |
| ▲ | monideas an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Most of what people call morality is just their own feelings or interest or some attempt to protect their ego, it's basically just an expression of narcissism. The cultivation of a sense of actual morality requires a lot of study and humility and quieting your own feelings and ego. This is very difficult and most people can't do it, ideally in a healthy society the elites you have are people who can and do do this. Ironically Thiel in particular is precisely one of these people. He's very thoughtful and well read and displays a lot of humility in his speech and conduct. | | |
| ▲ | singleshot_ 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | People with morals are narcissists and Peter Thiel is humble. Well, that’s a point of view, I guess. | | |
| ▲ | monideas 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | People with morals are moral. People often confuse morality with just their own feelings, interests, ego. If you don't understand this then likely you are not actually moral. | | |
| |
| ▲ | shimman an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is a very childlike understanding of how people engage with politics across the US. Fitting that immigrant tech workers wouldn't understand the culture then cry foul when rightfully called out on it. Maybe DHH was right. | | |
| ▲ | monideas 39 minutes ago | parent [-] | | This is exactly how most people engage with politics across the US (and all over the world) and I am not an immigrant tech worker. Both of my grandfathers served in WW2 in the US military. | | |
| ▲ | shimman 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Don't really believe you, looking at past comments you don't really come across as someone raised in America while also being completely unaware of what local politics looks like or how US citizens engage with politics. Not too mention the completely sociopathic comments made above. Are you trying to fool me or Stephen Miller here? |
|
| |
| ▲ | antonvs an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Most of what people call morality is just their own feelings or interest or some attempt to protect their ego, it's basically just an expression of narcissism. Oh good grief. Hot take of the month right there. All you're doing is demonstrating how uninformed you are on the subject. Can you name anything you've ever read about this? > [Thiel] displays a lot of humility in his speech and conduct. You can't be serious. Where in this does the talk of the "Antichrist" fit? What kind of humility are you talking about? Because if it means intellectual modesty, willingness to acknowledge one's own fallibility, or reluctance to cast one's own political/intellectual beliefs as uniquely farsighted, Thiel's public record is not consist with "displaying a lot of humility." | | |
| ▲ | monideas an hour ago | parent [-] | | The reason you call Thiel immoral or psychopathic is because he's wealthy and this evokes jealousy in you, it's a threat to your ego and your own sense of self worth. It's really that simple and this is a good illustration of what I'm talking about. | | |
| ▲ | esalman 10 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Quotes from the man himself: On Democracy and Freedom: "I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible" On Competition: "Competition is for losers" On Technology and Control: "One of the things I like about technology is that when technology is unregulated, you can change the world without getting approval from other people. At its best, it's not subject to democratic control and not subject to the majority, which I think is often hostile to change" On Reputation: "I'd rather be seen as evil than incompetent" | |
| ▲ | buellerbueller 13 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | No, Thiel is immoral because he is funding a panopticon and wants to get rid of democracy in favor of authoritarianism. It's really that simple, and your blindness to his cartoonish level of villainy is a good illustration of what everyone who is pushing back against you is talking about. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | PorciiVorbesc 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | >Because they're intelligent, work hard and have strong family ties. So when imported workers are having strong conservative values prioritizing their family over progressive values = good, but when western locals are having strong conservative values prioritizing their family over progressive values = bad? >But these things dissipate within a few generations of living in the US Have you heard of the amish? Or the ultra orthodox jews? Or other such groups with strong conservative values. You underestimate the stubbornness of certain cultures to adopt american/western progressive liberal values. They can stay conservative longer than you can stay alive. And also, given their significantly higher birth rates of their culture and religion, they'll also be able to outvote liberals who have catastrophically low birth rates, within a few generations. What do you think happens then with liberals and their values in a democracy? >hence the need for more and more foreign workers. Even when the locals are struggling to find jobs? | | |
| ▲ | monideas 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The elites in the West don't actually have an understanding of what they're doing. If your point is that it would be better if they promoted traditional values and invested in the native population, yes it would be, but that requires a whole metaphysical framework which elites in the West don't have. > Have you heard of the amish? Or the ultra orthodox jews? Yes and Western elites do not think like the Amish or like Orthodox Jews, they do not spend their time studying the Bible or care about that at all (they don't even study the Western classics). > Even when the locals are struggling to find jobs? They don't care about this, again this requires a whole metaphysical framework, at most they care about their own families and you'd probably be surprised at how dysfunctional these people are in their own private lives |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | antonvs 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > the foreign born employees did not care at all, they were just there to work. There's survivor bias in that observation. There are plenty of "foreign born employees" who choose not to work for companies that explicitly violate their values by choice. (I phrase it that way because of the whole "no ethical consumption under capitalism" issue.) I know because I'm one, and I have friends with the same mindset. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | dgellow 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Thank you, both for following your values and for sharing it publicly |
| |
| ▲ | 1234letshaveatw 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | yes, OC was so brave | | |
| ▲ | slowin 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I just want to say that I don't think I was brave at all. I actually feel a lot of shame because I knew that Microsoft wasn't compatible with my values when I joined. I didn't know the exact details that came out later, but I took a very high paying job for a company that I thought at best didn't align with my values. I had to live with a growing cognitive dissonance about the choices I made. I also didn't exit tech fully, I still work for a company that seems ethical and nice, but has VCs that are probably involved in the MIC post we're discussing. I've debated exiting tech fully but I do have people to support. I think that's kind of an excuse though. I also tell myself that anywhere I go, if you follow the money far enough up the chain, it will be unethical. That's also kind of an excuse. I'm not brave, but I do feel trapped. I think we need some sort of reckoning as an industry, a country and possibly a planet. I don't know what will happen but I'm trying to balance living in 2026 with making choices that I can live with in the future. | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 6 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | So, did you stay long enough to accumulate FU money and then quit? Because that's a bit easier than quitting or turning down a job when you need the income. Since you say you're still working and have people to support I am guessing it was more the latter, but maybe the "very high paying job" gave you the runway needed to make that choice? I quit a high paying software job under different circumstances. The company wasn't doing anything unethical (that I know of) but I was just sick of how they managed people and projects. It had reached the point where I sat in my car for 15 minutes (or longer) every morning just trying to summon the willpower to get out and walk into the office. So I finally just quit. But it was easier as I had stashed away enough money to give me time to find a new job without having to jump on the first offer. I ended up freelancing a bit to extend the runway even longer. | |
| ▲ | monideas 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well there's definitely a global reckoning happening, people are not having children in developed countries due to very serious social ills (every developed country except for Israel of course). | | |
| ▲ | Fraterkes an hour ago | parent [-] | | Social ills whose minds are pure machinery! Social ills whose blood is running money! Social ills whose fingers are ten armies! |
|
| |
| ▲ | buellerbueller 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Did you realize that sharing personal attacks is, in fact, optional? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | georgeburdell 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Do you support the status quo of millions of H1Bs? Those people I doubt can or will take such a principled stance, making collective action by tech workers impossible. |
| |
| ▲ | tombert 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Wouldn't this be an argument for people who can take principled stances to do so? | | | |
| ▲ | wartywhoa23 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That's exactly why they are imported in such huge numbers. | |
| ▲ | dietr1ch an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | You can comfortably go back to your home country. It might feel that you wasted your time in the US, but it was hard to foresee Trump ruining the US so fast and there's little to do about it as an immigrant. |
|
|
| ▲ | nater5000 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You know, if enough tech workers at Microsoft felt strongly about these ethical issues, they could influence Microsoft's decisions internally which is probably the most effective position to be in to do so. But all well, glad you can feel good about yourself by leaving so that someone with less concern about these ethical issues can fill the void and assert their own influence on the company instead. |
| |
| ▲ | JohnMakin 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Have you ever worked at a large company? This is simply not how things are done. Speaking up about something like this is almost a guaranteed fast track to getting laid off in the next round of reduction in force, and if you do somehow have the pull individually or collectively to make a meaningful difference here, coordinating all those levers in a way that satisfies the board/shareholders and effects meaningful change is pretty much an impossibility. And we're dealing with nation states who are going to have their own levers to push (and internally too). For an individual contributor or hell, someone who's not on the board/C suite, quitting and letting management know they're losing talent because of their stance on certain issues is probably the most effective thing someone can do in that spot. Following your line of thinking, why don't you join microsoft and effect such change? I guess it's easier to leave a moralizing snarky comment and feel good about yourself. | | |
| ▲ | reverius42 an hour ago | parent [-] | | There's a solution to this problem, and that solution is workers unionizing. |
| |
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | tamimio 36 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah, relying on someone’s conscious won’t really cut it, greed and current economy will always win. The best solution imo is crowdsourcing, there should be a site or platform that aggregates all the people who works in these companies, categories the company as grey or black list based on how engaged in shady practices. If someone chose to do something morally questionable, it’s up to them, but it’s also transparent that other people know that, could be colleagues, employers, or investors. I think it’s fair that whoever is building surveillance systems and tracking to be surveilled, whoever is making weapons to be known, they can be a public danger given that they sell their morals to highest bidder. |
|
| ▲ | sadnvkse 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| At the risk of being downvoted to oblivion. Threads like this always have lots of people agreeing to people quitting the jobs, not even ones that are directly working on that but even ones just associated with the company at hand.
This is an honest question, how do you decide what is Ok? A job with a company that was involved in this is not Ok, fair enough. What about working with a company that does business with Microsoft or uses Microsoft products? What about owning Microsoft stock and benefiting off it? what about owning Microsoft stock via index funds? Don't mean to be pedantic, but can I use Microsoft products, can I use outlook? can I use an xbox? What are my other realistic options, considering it feels like every industry (not just tech) has big 2-3 realistic options and they all likely have something bad headlines, even if I don't know about it. How much time can I realistically invest digging and fact checking this? I want to be good, but these threads generally leave me feeling judged. I understand everyone has their moral compass, and they act accordingly. But, I find it hard to not ask myself, if this is not OK, why is this other related thing Ok? how do I decide what's Ok and seems when you ask the question you get downvotes and lots of judgement instead of answers. |
| |
| ▲ | NDlurker 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I sold my Microsoft stock when they started talking about military AR headsets. Except the index funds. I'm not sure what to do about that. | |
| ▲ | t-writescode 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think you answered it. Everyone has their own moral compass and act accordingly. The concept of “No Ethical Consumption Under Capitalism” and the moral framing of later seasons of The Good Place give good representations of how. Ultimately each person makes a mark of what they can and cannot care about, and caring about literally everything is a fast-track to total impotence. Some situations are (relatively) easy: * Harry Potter is a relatively isolated (though formative for many)
franchise.
Some situations are way harder. * Nestle creates a HUGE amount of the food we eat.
* Amazon powers half the internet
* Microsoft is the backbone of a huge number of corporate sites.
Excel makes the world go round.
Unfortunately, this is all up to you, and there are individual scales of “harm to the world by participating” vs “harm to you by abstaining” you have to personally weigh. There is no global answer. | | |
| ▲ | Terr_ 11 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I think a way-out exists if "shopping isn't politics" [0]. In a nutshell: * Bad news: "Voting with your wallet" is actually pretty ineffective. Companies know it, budget for it, and they're happy when consumers are neutralized and busy infighting with one-another. * Good news: Organizing politically does work, and is so much more effective that you can arguably redeem your unthinking consumer-choices if you engage in it. [0] https://doctorow.medium.com/https-pluralistic-net-2026-05-21... |
| |
| ▲ | slowin 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I agree that these are good questions to be asking and I asked myself many of them. It's a slippery slope imho, and it's easy to convince yourself that what you're doing is ok. At the end of the day, I was getting physically sick and I felt terrible about myself. I mentioned it up thread, I don't think I was brave, I was just forced to confront reality through increasingly difficult to dismiss cognitive dissonance. |
|
|
| ▲ | FLeXMurphy 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What was your job at Microsoft? |
| |
| ▲ | slowin 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I was a 68 working on consumer products, but it was still too much for me. Especially the revelation that Satya worked with the IDF to capture all Palestinian phone conversations and host them on Azure. Every day I woke up to go to work after I found that out, I was sick to my stomach. I eventually couldn't take it any more. I took a pay cut and I'm still in the tech industry working for a startup, and still facing ethical dilemmas (with our investors) but at least I'm not on the front-lines of human rights abuse. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/06/microsoft-isra... | | |
| ▲ | FLeXMurphy 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | War is a massive racket. | |
| ▲ | 1234letshaveatw 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | TIL an intelligence agency spying on a foreign adversary is human rights abuse. I would be super upset if my country of residence did the same to a neighbor sending rockets my way, would make me sick to my stomach | | |
| ▲ | Fraterkes 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Little slip of the mask here where we seamlessly transition from the perspective of an American working for an American tech company to someone living in a country neighbouring Palestine. | | | |
| ▲ | swozey 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | He didn't work for Israel, unless he failed to mention that this was not a USA job. | |
| ▲ | tessierashpool 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | take these theatrics somewhere else, please. you're changing the topic and you're not arguing in good faith. | | | |
| ▲ | antonvs 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > TIL an intelligence agency spying on a foreign adversary is human rights abuse. It is when it's an intelligence agency for a country that's actively committing genocide. Answer a question for me: is the lesson you took from the Holocaust something like "if there are going to be holocausts anyway, I want to be the one committing them"? |
| |
| ▲ | swozey 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I've always figured big tech workers were so compartmentalized that they wouldn't know their new analytic feature was also going to the defense skunks initiative, but that could be conspiratorial thinking. Guess it doesn't matter now when they have full on defense orgs. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | righthand 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You’re doing the right thing! Glad to see this kind of action. |
|
| ▲ | davidw 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I feel like tech has lost its way recently. It's a huge, huge field, so there have always been people working on 'bad' things, but IDK, I just don't have the same feeling of optimism about things that I used to and I wish there was some kind of movement bringing that back. |
| |
| ▲ | edgyquant 41 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I don’t know I think it’s really rich to see people who’ve spent a generation hooking the world on dopamine machines and making society full of hate suddenly act like those who work in the MIC are “going to far.” People working at big tech are complicit in the destruction of communities and the mass depression and suicide of our youth, compared to that wanting your country to have the best military tech is altruistic. Military tech isn’t the problem foreign policy is, you can’t say the same about slop factory builders. | |
| ▲ | Benjammer 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Recently? Blind (teamblind.com) culture has been taking over tech for like a decade at this point. | | |
| ▲ | lbrito 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think the parent commenter is referring to a much darker side of tech than just TC-chasing Blind culture, which is pretty harmless in comparison | |
| ▲ | foobiekr an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Blind culture is really just asian cultural values in aggregate form. |
| |
| ▲ | lbrito 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think many people share this feeling. I sure do. I don't see how it could have gone any other way. The internet became too pervasive, too embedded into too many people's lives, for it to not be weaponized by governments and large companies. |
|
|
| ▲ | cynicalsecurity 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You spoke to my heart, comrade! Already sending Microsoft my resignation letter so I can join you on skid row fighting against the evil capitalist empire! |
|
| ▲ | shimman 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It should be noted that MSFT is the only tech company that explicitly asked the FBI to surveil about workers that were protesting the Gaza genocide: https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/microsof... --- Also thank you for your bravery, it is not easy leaving well paid jobs. If you haven't already, I'd start donating some time with your local mutual aid groups. It's very therapeutic to spend time with people that believe similar things while helping others. |
|
| ▲ | username_my1 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is the problem with capitalism. Nothing is ever enough, all the top tech companies, it's not enough that the conquered the global market, not enough that they dominated commerce, media, automotive, cloud, space ... it's not enough that they have the largest headcounts on the planet (outside India / China). they always need to do more and bigger the next quarter. no morals, no core market, no other guideline, simply more, and I have to do it because else someone else will. I really hope the Chinese keep killing everything that gets too big to fail. endless growth is the same as cancer. unnatural destructive. |
| |
| ▲ | MisterTea 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I really hope the Chinese keep killing everything that gets too big to fail. Be careful what you wish for. What happens when China gets too big to fail? | | |
|
|
| ▲ | sippingabonedry 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| On the contrary, you will do exactly as you're told if you expect to cash those sweet MSFT paychecks, which I assume you did prior to this epiphany, otherwise you would have returned all the money. Has this level of obtuseness infected the software industry because this is not the first time I've heard this; usually someone will take a job at a missile factory then later realize "Wait, we build war machines AND sell them to countries I don't like? I had no idea!" This isn't an employee-owned grocery store where your opinions matter. You're at the point in Goodfellas where he tells the babysitter "do you understand what we're involved in here?" |
| |
| ▲ | cyanydeez an hour ago | parent [-] | | I bet your opinion of effective altruism is essentially the same as mine: the idea that you can do the worst things in the world to make enough money to solve all the worlds problems is a delusions on par with "prosperity gospel". Humans are just excellent as crafting a philosophy that suits what they've already chosen to do. |
|
|
| ▲ | pfdietz 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > It's up to us, as tech workers to push back against this. This appears to me to be unrealistic or performative, except if you mean pushing back in the sense that anyone could, as a voter for example. Boycott of defense work won't work; attempting to claim some special authority in debate won't work either. |
| |
| ▲ | datsci_est_2015 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The opposite of performative action is even worse: nihilism or even active support of atrocities. Too many nihilists in the tech industry with the attitude “if I don’t do it someone else will”, and here we are as a professional class actively making the world an objectively shittier place. The VCs can’t do it without us. | | |
| ▲ | ForHackernews 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is exactly the problem: Software developers are not a professional class, we are hired goons with no professional organization nor a code of professional ethics. This is one of my personal bugbears. I keep making this point on HN but devs want to LARP as professionals so they usually don't want to hear that they have more in common with retail workers than they do with carpenters, engineers, or accountants. Previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47625159 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48932441 | | |
| ▲ | datsci_est_2015 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Maybe AI will provide an impetus for change. One can only hope. I’d be willing to pay a few hundred dollars a year to be a part of a professional organization that maintains ethics requirements at this point. | |
| ▲ | mikestew 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, and read the responses to your comments: "but, but, 'professional' is a state of mind, not just a piece of paper" and some crap, completely missing the point. Professionals push back with "I'll lose my license/certification/disbarred". Software developers push back with "yes, sir, how high, sir?" or "I quit". |
|
|
|