| ▲ | Mistral now trains on user input by default, except on enterprise tier(help.mistral.ai) |
| 77 points by teekert 2 hours ago | 42 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | teekert 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Context: After careful research our organization preferred a European partner with good central privacy controls. We landed on Mistral, after being disappointed that the Pro tier was opt-in to training on prompts by default we switched up to the Team tier which provides an organization dashboard with some relevant settings. As we did that Mistral changed these options and the Team tier was now also opt-in by default and at the same time seemed to have lost the ability to centrally disable training on prompts for your entire organization. This even caused some of our (testing) prompts to be used for training (which Mistral removed after we expressed our disappointment). For some time these pages conflicted with what our users reported (they said that in contrast to what I stated to our management they found they were opted into training on prompts by default as per their own privacy page). Mistral just now corrected their docs. I'm not sure how long the conflicting situation has lasted, but at least for several days. For contrast: Claude disables training on prompts for organizations starting from the 18 euro tier [0]. As a European I'm disappointed. [0] https://claude.com/pricing#team-&-enterprise |
| |
| ▲ | throwaway89201 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > and at the same time seemed to have lost the ability to centrally disable training on prompts for your entire organization There is a toggle on https://admin.mistral.ai that allows you to disable training for both Vibe and Console/API for your entire organisation. And I'm not on the enterprise plan. I've disabled training the first time I created an account, and it has remained that way. You story is also very confusing due to the wording around "opt-in by default" and "disappointed [about] opt-in to training" (most people would be disappointed about an opt-out) and probably conveys the wrong message to most people. | |
| ▲ | lukan an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | "For contrast: Claude disables training on prompts for organizations starting from the 18 euro tier " In theory also for individuals? At least I have that toggle to deactivate that. But how would I ever know if they actually respect that? | | |
| ▲ | kccqzy 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | If you don’t trust the company to keep their promise, don’t use their products. | | |
| ▲ | RussianCow 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I don't trust any company with their word on anything. Luckily, privacy policies are legally binding. |
| |
| ▲ | danelski 11 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | My 20 EUR Claude (individual) had the training on by default. | |
| ▲ | warkdarrior 16 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | How do you know an LLM provider does not kill puppies every time you send a prompt longer than 14 words? | | |
| ▲ | lukan 7 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Because they have no incentive as a company to do that?
But do have a strong incentive to learn from user input.
(Most cutting edge features are developed private - very valuable to get that into your tool) And getting the data is not hard, they already have it.
Risky is indeed a bit making use of that data, as that requires at least some humans (as potential whistleblowers). But you don't even have to tell them, where the data came from. Whether they do it? No idea, I assume not, but I see a risk. |
|
| |
| ▲ | summarity an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | “Opt in by default” would mean that it is not enabled by default. Do you mean opt out? | | |
| ▲ | teekert an hour ago | parent [-] | | You are "opting in to sharing your prompts for training", by default in this case. My slider says: "Allow the use of your interactions with Vibe to train Mistral's AI models.", it is on by default for everyone on the Team plan, the admin can't centrally turn it off anymore, and any user can toggle it when they want to. This all changed last week. I know I'm naive but I expect that when I pay, this stuff is simply off, so I was already surprised by the Pro plan. But I did look out for it there, because Anthropic made this switch some time ago. | | |
| ▲ | KPGv2 41 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > You are "opting in to sharing your prompts for training", by default in this case. The English term for that is "opt out" not "opt in." To opt is to choose. If something is on by default, you have not opted in. You were forced in, and turning it off means you must opt out. (I.e., choose to be out.) normally I wouldn't care about a mistake like this, except that opt in/out are very important concepts in software development and hacker culture. And it reversed the meaning of the original comment in a highly confusing, relevant way. | | |
| ▲ | jrave 15 minutes ago | parent [-] | | as another non-native speaker, i think that while the person you're answering to didn't use the default way of expressing this in the english-speaking world, i did understand what they meant, i think they do know what opting means and i think the reasoning is this:
when they say data collection is "opt in" by default they mean that by choosing to use a product, you are opting into your data being collected (at the same time).
on the other hand, native speakers saying something is "opt out" describes the options or toggles one has available in the default case - when something is toggled "true", you (only) have the choice to toggle it of.
so english speakers talk about the controls one has to CHANGE the status quo. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | ylisav a minute ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Very disappointing, but who doesn't train on user data? It's the only moat they have |
|
| ▲ | matthieu_bl 2 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Summary of the different scenarios Service: Vibe
Plan: Non-Enterprise
Default: Opted in
Opt-out possible? Yes Service: Vibe
Plan: Enterprise
Default: Opted out
Opt-out possible? Yes (admin-managed) Service: Mistral Studio/API
Plan: Not specified
Default: Not stated, I assume opted in
Opt-out possible? Yes |
|
| ▲ | Diti 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This gets posted literally moments before I was about to pay them after ditching Claude. Thank you! I hate data collection in paid products. I think I will be using Kagi Ultimate for the inference UI, so the data is somewhat anonymized before being collected. |
| |
| ▲ | evanjrowley 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | My best experience with Mistral has been with their expensive GLM-5.2 model. It's actually developed by Z.ai, but unlike Z.ai, the GLM-5.2 at Mistral can be used at a low price without training on your prompts - but only if you remember to hit the privacy toggle in their admin settings. Planning code changes with GLM-5.2 using a Mistral Studio API key and implementing code changes using the Mistral Vibe API key has worked well for me. At my basic subscription tier, Vibe will share data with Mistral. It works for me because, when it comes to privacy, I care less about the actual code and more about the planning / high-level stuff. | |
| ▲ | throwaway89201 32 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm really hoping Mistral will succeed with their open models, so I'm a bit biased, but I don't have any affiliation. This submit is a bit of well-meaning but confused scaremongering however. Mistral has had, and continues to have, a toggle in the admin settings that permanently disables training on your data. The option has not been removed, and previous opt-outs are still honored. As far as I know, Mistral always trained on your data by default except for the enterprise plan, with the option to disable it on all plans, and with the option for organizations to make the choice for all your users. Kagi Ultimate still uses mostly closed models by OpenAI / Anthropic, etc. | |
| ▲ | saaaaaam 19 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | You can opt out. |
|
|
| ▲ | maz1b 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I could be mistaken, but wasn't Mistral openly championing themselves as a company and EU option that wouldn't do this/didn't do this? |
| |
| ▲ | whizzter 35 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Maybe they realized that they were falling behind too much? To me it seems like user-feedback on bad descisions by the AI once it's trained to a basic level is among the most important signals in tuning the model to perform better. | | |
| ▲ | danelski 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | That's what I believe. Once you have scanned every passive source available, using the user conversations to e.g. find common paths to a solution and shortcut them would seem natural. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | saaaaaam 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is a hugely misleading editorialised title. The page title is "Can I opt out of my input or output data being used for training". Right at the top of the page it says "In certain cases, your input and output data (such as conversations, documents, and other user-provided content) may be included in Mistral’s model training programs. You retain full control over this processing and have the right to opt out of these programs at any time." |
|
| ▲ | maxdo an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It’s a spyware, but a sovereign one |
| |
| ▲ | zoobab an hour ago | parent [-] | | What do you expect from running on "someone else computer?" | | |
| ▲ | r_lee 13 minutes ago | parent [-] | | a service provided to you for the money you paid? just like with any other business? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | segmondy an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There are so models that beats all of Mistral models, plus you can run many of them locally. Why would anyone run Mistral? |
| |
| ▲ | villish 20 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | To have at least a choice of using a European trained model. Downloadable weights is not open source. Mistral is able to respond to any regulatory queries about training data and concerns. | |
| ▲ | jnurmine 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | To be honest, I have a hard time noticing differences with Claude (in Kiro) and Mistral Vibe, at least with what I use them for. They simply feel like talking to the exact same thing. | |
| ▲ | perks_12 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The OCR stuff is quite usable. Their models perform good at some very basic tasks, so I use them to diversify. But their current model lineup is really terrible. | |
| ▲ | KPGv2 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Possibly because Mistral is a French-based company, so EU companies can cut the American umbilical cord a bit more. | | |
| ▲ | A_D_E_P_T 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | EU companies can download GLM or Kimi-K3 and get way better performance, though? I don't see any case for using a Mistral model when much better open models exist. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | vb-8448 9 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My bet is that mistral models will suddenly start to shine. |
|
| ▲ | perks_12 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I assume they do this no before releasing new models. It feels like they expect higher user influx from their new models. |
|
| ▲ | f6v 41 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Same company that has a partnership with Saudis, btw. |
|
| ▲ | danelski 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Most commenters here clutching their pearls as if Claude and Gemini Pro didn't do it already. In the latter you (as a paying customer) can't even store the chat history unless you agree to their 'improvement of services'.
Do you have all your accounts paid for by the enterprise or you never check the settings? |
|
| ▲ | krunck 19 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Very disappointing. I really get the sense that all AI companies and anti-privacy parasites on society. |
|
| ▲ | DerDerDaIst 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Oh come on. So you should be fine with this because "hey we're the friendly europeans..."? |
|
| ▲ | ex1fm3ta 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I mean they all do it right ? Mistral is just the first one to publicly say it. |
|
| ▲ | floki165 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Taking away the ability to centrally enforce an opt-out across an organization is a massive red flag. You can't reasonably expect every individual employee on a Team plan to remember to dig into their personal settings and flip a privacy toggle. For any company dealing with sensitive IP or GDPR-compliant data, this basically makes the Team tier unusable. |
| |
| ▲ | throwaway89201 40 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | This isn't the case. There's a toggle on https://admin.mistral.ai that allows you to disable training for both Vibe and Console/API for your entire organization, I just checked. | |
| ▲ | shujip 43 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes. If the privacy control only exists per user, it isn't a control for a team. Defaults matter more than the blog post. "You can opt out" is not the same product as "the org can actually enforce opt out." |
|
|
| ▲ | r_lee an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| European innovation right here you can't make this shit up |