| ▲ | lukan 2 hours ago |
| "For contrast: Claude disables training on prompts for organizations starting from the 18 euro tier " In theory also for individuals? At least I have that toggle to deactivate that. But how would I ever know if they actually respect that? |
|
| ▲ | kccqzy an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| If you don’t trust the company to keep their promise, don’t use their products. |
| |
| ▲ | LeBit 41 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | How can you trust any company? The only company you could think of trusting is one where an external , independent auditor is doing its work. | |
| ▲ | RussianCow an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't trust any company with their word on anything. Luckily, privacy policies are legally binding. | | |
| ▲ | nullsanity 17 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Why does that matter? Legally binding just means "slightly more expensive when we get caught" |
|
|
|
| ▲ | danelski an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My 20 EUR Claude (individual) had the training on by default. |
| |
|
| ▲ | tedggh 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Always assume and act as they won’t honor it. |
|
| ▲ | warkdarrior an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| How do you know an LLM provider does not kill puppies every time you send a prompt longer than 14 words? |
| |
| ▲ | lukan an hour ago | parent [-] | | Because they have no incentive as a company to do that?
But do have a strong incentive to learn from user input.
(Most cutting edge features are developed private - very valuable to get that into your tool) And getting the data is not hard, they already have it.
Risky is indeed a bit making use of that data, as that requires at least some humans (as potential whistleblowers). But you don't even have to tell them, where the data came from. Whether they do it? No idea, I assume not, but I see a risk. |
|