Remix.run Logo
wmf 3 hours ago

There's an exception for batteries that "retain at least 80% of its original capacity after 1,000 charge cycles." Coincidentally, iPhones and probably other flagships already qualify for this exception.

eqvinox 29 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

JFTR: achieving that capacity retention is a question of charge settings. Pretty much any Lithium ion battery can achieve it if you don't charge it to the absolute maximum possible each time.

It's quite simple. While you can charge a "good old" Lithium ion battery to 4.2V, you already start getting slow degradation at that point. Charging it to 4.1V or 4.05V massively reduces that. But at the same time, those 100 or 150mV are a notable amount of charge, up to 20%. So… yeah. It's a tradeoff.

For reference: https://nenpower.com/blog/how-does-charging-voltage-impact-t...

https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussion... page 15

protimewaster 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Last time this was discussed, it was stated that the text exempting based on cycle counts was removed from the final, adopted version. Is that incorrect?

jorams an hour ago | parent | next [-]

The batteries regulation[1] doesn't contain such an exemption. The legal argument that iPhones may be exempt goes like this:

- The batteries regulation is a general regulation and article 11 specifically says the following:

> This paragraph shall be without prejudice to any specific provisions ensuring a higher level of protection of the environment and human health relating to the removability and replaceability of portable batteries by end-users laid down in any Union law on electrical and electronic equipment as defined in Article 3(1), point (a), of Directive 2012/19/EU.

- There is a different regulation, the ecodesign regulation for smartphones and tablets[2], that is more specific and therefore might supersede the batteries regulation on this front, which says:

> (ii) manufacturers, importers or authorised representatives may provide the battery or batteries referred to in point (i)(a) only to professional repairers if manufacturers, importers or authorised representatives ensure that the following requirements are met:

> (a) after 500 full charge cycles the battery has, in a fully charged state, a remaining capacity of at least 83 % of the rated capacity;

> (b) the battery endurance in cycles achieves a minimum of 1 000 full charge cycles and after 1 000 full charge cycles the battery has, in a fully charged state, a remaining capacity of at least 80 % of the rated capacity;

> (c) the device meets IP67 rating.

[1]: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...

[2]: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...

arendtio 20 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

But what exactly is a charge cycle? I mean, the effect on a battery being loaded from 0% to 100% and drained to 0% again is vastly different from a battery being charged from 40% to 50% and being used until 40% ten times in a row.

SoftTalker 9 minutes ago | parent [-]

And how many people have the free mental space to manage the charge capacity of their phone?

I plug mine into the charger when I go to bed, and unplug it in the morning when I start my day. I don't have time to think about phone charge levels much beyond that.

lostlogin 2 minutes ago | parent [-]

The will mange it for you - the iOS setting app has options to do this.

motbus3 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I can strongly state that it is 100% possible to do ip67 with removable batteries in the sense people general mean.

That said, I am afraid how one can play with the definition of removable. Everything is removable given enough force.

FeepingCreature 28 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

EU courts generally frown on such shenanigans.

throwaway2037 23 minutes ago | parent [-]

Great point. This sections closes that opportunity:

    > No barriers: The use of adhesives that can only be removed with heat or solvents is prohibited.
The whole "removable (but only) with a jackhammer" is negated immediately.
vrighter 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

the galaxy s5 had everything we are told they removed for waterproofing. removable back cover and battery, and a headphone jack

peterlada an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

This is solid. I like it.

criddell 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

On the page linked to it mentions the two exceptions that exempt iPhone and other flagship phones - long lifespan (80% after 1000 charges) and waterproof (IP67).

The other exemption criteria is for specialized (medical) devices and devices where a removable battery would be unsafe.

protimewaster 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It does, but, in the previous HN discussion, there was a link to the what was reportedly the adopted version of the bill, and those exemptions were gone from the text.

2 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
IshKebab an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah I found the exception for waterproof devices (which isn't any waterproof devices; arguably phones wouldn't count). But there doesn't appear to be anything about cycle counts:

> To ensure the safety of end-users, this Regulation should provide for a limited derogation for portable batteries from the removability and replaceability requirements set for portable batteries concerning appliances that incorporate portable batteries and that are specifically designed to be used, for the majority of the active service of the appliance, in an environment that is regularly subject to splashing water, water streams or water immersion and that are intended to be washable or rinseable. This derogation should only apply when it is not possible, by way of redesign of the appliance, to ensure the safety of the end-user and the safe continued use of the appliance after the end-user has correctly followed the instructions to remove and replace the battery. Where the derogation applies, the product should be designed in such a way as to make the battery removable and replaceable only by independent professionals, and not by end-users.

foolfoolz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

i’m ok with this and an $80 battery replacement in exchange for better waterproofing

ratiolat 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

IP68, replaceable battery, phone jack, 5G: https://m.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_xcover6_pro-11600.php

badsectoracula 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Unfortunately it is from 2022, meaning no OS upgrades.

I think the next mandatory laws EU should pass is that manufacturers should either allow people to upgrade/replace the OS by themselves or provide mandatory upgrades for the next decade (i don't care how the manufacturers handle it, that's up to them, but the easiest way out of such a law is to allow people upgrade/replace the OS by themselves).

tremon 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The regulation already mandates an OS upgrade period, but the period depends on how long the manufacturer keeps selling the model: software updates must be provided for five years from the day when the manufacturer stops selling the product. From Annex II B, section 1.2:

> (6) Operating system updates:

> (a) from the date of end of placement on the market to at least 5 years after that date, manufacturers, importers or authorised representatives shall, if they provide security updates, corrective updates or functionality updates to an operating system, make such updates available at no cost for all units of a product model with the same operating system;

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1670/oj

There's some weasel wording there ("if they provide ..."), so I'm curious how the courts are going to interpret that clause.

conk 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Why only one decade? I’m still running a 2012 Mac mini. Apple stopped updating Mac OS some time ago, but there are plenty of alternatives that can run on the bare metal. Hardware makers should be required to provide support for the life of the device (defined by customers still using the device), or provide a reasonable way to install 3rd party OS.

capitainenemo 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

At least on Android, when my Samsung Galaxy Note (I loved that phone - replaceable battery, pressure sensitive stylus, IR blaster, OLED, audio jack, water resistant - they went downhill from there IMO) finally end of lifed, I just used the official Samsung tool to upload a community image on it. The process wasn't horrendously difficult. I don't know if people would do it, but it was a clear set of steps that even a tech novice could accomplish if following carefully.

kube-system an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

An operating system is only part of the software you might need to update or secure on a phone (as is the case with many other devices).

amarant an hour ago | parent [-]

Indeed! The law needs to include firmware in some way. I'm not smart enough to come up with how exactly it should be dealt with, but it does need to be dealt with.

Currently Qualcomm decides when your phone stops getting updates, pretty much regardless to who actually made your phone.

Shoutout to fairphone who actually updated the firmware themselves, surely a loss leading project, but a very respectable dedication to end users.

microtonal 6 minutes ago | parent [-]

Shoutout to fairphone who actually updated the firmware themselves, surely a loss leading project, but a very respectable dedication to end users.

I am not sure how much of a shout-out they deserve. For example, Fairphone 4 is still supported until this year. They ship with firmware from 2023 and with a kernel patch release from 2024. Every one of their phones is full of holes because their software lags so much.

Even on their most recent model, they are frequently more than a half year behind firmware updates, ship 1-2 year old kernels, and are late with major Android releases (meaning you miss out on security patches not classified high/critical).

Good examples of software longevity are iPhone, Google Pixel, GrapheneOS, and to a lesser extend Samsung flagships.

monegator an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The point is it's doable (and it was doable long before that. See the S5.)

jamesnorden 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>Unfortunately it is from 2022, meaning no OS upgrades.

I like how you didn't even bother checking if that was true.

Kirby64 an hour ago | parent [-]

Samsung committed to 5 years of OS upgrades on that one, so it’s theoretically getting one more upgrade next year at best. (Or maybe 2, if they release one this year). It’s nearly end of life for a software perspective.

ratiolat 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's receiving monthly updates: https://security.samsungmobile.com/workScope.smsb

torginus 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Phones should be like PCs - they give you the hardware, and you figure out what to install on it. Unfortunately Linux imo is partially to blame here - if they decided to do a stable driver ABI (don't hate me, this was the norm outside Linux and open source OSes), you could easily separate the OS and drivers and update the m separately.

realusername 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The missing link here is ACPI, unlike on PC, the hardware doesn't describe what it has to the OS, making the task much harder.

The lack of standardization of handled devices is also another factor, they might look similar or even identical but they often are different per region and have some hardware revisions.

Android does have a separate driver partition nowadays but that doesn't help too much.

umanwizard an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Who is "they"? Linux isn't a person or an organization. The people (and organizations) contributing to Linux are all doing it for their own motivations to solve their own problems. You are asking them to make their lives harder, for free, in service of fixing an issue that they don't care about.

capitainenemo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So, they have an XCover 7 now - with similar specs.

Also, they committed to a rather long support cycle for the xcover6 (5 years I think?) - I have one and it is still going strong. I've replaced the battery twice - not because I desperately needed to, but... why not. They are cheap, and I use the older ones still as backup battery packs since they are fast to swap in.

0x457 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think the idea behind parent comment: it's possible to have these features and have a removable battery.

encom 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>Unfortunately it is from 2022, meaning no OS upgrades.

False. This is my work phone and the last update was less than a month ago. It's still supported.

jodleif 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Would be really nice. Seems like even android is getting more and more locked down

varispeed 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's not going to happen, because government need backdoors to the devices. That's why ability to flash own os is severely limited.

Aurornis an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

And all of the commenters complaining they would never buy this phone is great proof that the removable battery movement is DOA.

These phones exist. Companies have been producing them intermittently. When they do, few people buy them and there are always complaints that it's too big, too ugly, not fast enough, or something else.

The vocal minority demanding this feature but refusing to buy phones with the feature believe they can have their cake and eat it too. They want phones with all the benefits of built-in batteries and none of the downsides of removable batteries.

Dylan16807 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Well, I want a phone that's about one tier below flagship and has certain features. I don't think that's unreasonable.

For comparison: The feature I look for the most is a microsd slot. The last time that option existed that was in the quality range I want, I bought it. For anyone buying a phone right now, samsung has dropped microsd support from multiple more tiers, google and apple have never offered it, motorola and some others have the physical hardware but won't properly update the phone...

That's a feature that has been demonstrated to have no meaningful downsides, and manufacturers won't put it in to good models. I'm not convinced batteries are very different. People's refusal to make huge unnecessary compromises doesn't prove any features are DOA. I can guarantee that the above phone using LCD instead of OLED isn't a compromise for the battery's sake.

The biggest downside of removable batteries is that it's not an option on good phones. There might be some solid physics-based reasons, unlike with microsd, but I'm skeptical.

gwbas1c an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> And all of the commenters complaining they would never buy this phone is great proof that the removable battery movement is DOA.

I had to reflect on that statement for a bit. I've always bought a new phone when there are battery problems or something else. BUT, that's because I can easily afford it.

There are plenty of people in this world who just can't go out and buy a new phone because one part wore out.

Or, to put it differently: I'd really like to replace the battery in my spare phone that I bring into my hot tub.

at-fates-hands 32 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

I always felt the issue with removable batteries was they had a smaller capacity and would run out of life faster - so the need to be able to replace a battery if you wanted your phone to last more than a few years was important.

Now, with much higher capacity batteries that work better and are more efficient at handling all the demanding displays, high end gpu's and now AI tasks running the background? There's really no need to have removable batteries any more.

Sure, you're going to get a few lemons here and there, but for the most part, batteries these days have no problem lasting the 4-5 years that you need them. You still see three or four year old iphones on ebay with 80-85% battery being sold like hot cakes.

vrighter 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

galaxy s5 from 2014 also achieved all of this. It was a solved problem literally over a decade ago

kaiwn 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

2 mm thicker and 58 grams heavier than the latest iPhone.

GuB-42 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is also a rugged phone. So if you want to make a fair comparison with an iPhone, you have to put the iPhone in a case, resulting in a similar weight and thickness.

rootusrootus 17 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

The distinction, though, is that you get to make that choice as the consumer. You can carry the phone with no case, or you can put a very rugged case on it, or something in between.

Dylan16807 4 minutes ago | parent [-]

> The distinction, though, is that you get to make that choice

From the narrow point of view of "this option or nothing", yes.

For the more general purpose view of "imagine a non-rugged version", such a phone would have a lot less of a size/weight penalty.

torginus 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah the first thing everyone does with their new iPhones is put them in a case - at that point thinness doesn't matter, Id argue Apple counts on it, as their phones are awkward to hold otherwise.

Replaceable covers used to serve the same purpose.

capitainenemo 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Indeed. I've had my XCover 6 for 3½ years now. I've dropped it many times, on hard surfaces (like outdoor concrete/brick). I've undoubtedly been fortunate. the plastic has gouges in it. there's (small) scratches on the screen (some from my keys), but the screen is not cracked. When it is dropped the back and battery pop off, which I think helps dissipate the forces. BTW, for anyone trying to extend their phone life, I strongly recommend those magnetic USB connectors. Reduces wear and tear on the USB port, and is also kinda convenient for quick disconnect.

GuB-42 an hour ago | parent [-]

> I strongly recommend those magnetic USB connectors

Note that these connectors are in violation of USB standard and potentially harmful as they expose the pins in an unintended way. For instance, notice that all the connection on the USB port are not all the same length, it is a form of protection, to make sure the power lines are well connected before the data lines make contact. With magnetic USB connectors, you lose that feature, in addition to potential issues with ESD, short circuits, etc...

I have a friend who swears by them and never had a problem, but still, that's good to know.

kube-system an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> Yeah the first thing everyone does with their new iPhones is put them in a case - at that point thinness doesn't matter

Or does that mean thinness matter just that much more?

MisterTea 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The horror.

nozzlegear 2 hours ago | parent [-]

This but unironically. People like thin and light flagship phones.

thomassmith65 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Hooray! No more camera bump :)

toasty228 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Oh yeah so it's utter trash and not worthy of our attention. Imagine carrying a whole 58 grams more, during a whole day, impossible for the average tech worker's atrophied muscles

chroma 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The point is that people have different preferences, so the EU should not force people to buy phones with removable batteries. People who want such features can buy those phones, and people who want smaller, thinner phones can buy ones with integrated batteries.

At most the EU should tax externalities like electronic waste, though that would be a rounding error compared to the cost of the phone itself.

user_7832 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> The point is that people have different preferences, so the EU should not force people to buy phones with removable batteries.

There are many food additives with very useful properties, but health effects. There are many perfumes too where the original formulation had a particular compound layer found to be carcinogenic.

Regardless of whether an individual prefers to use such compounds at their own risk or not, large companies will use whatever is the cheapest ingredient for their product.

In some cases, that's better for the consumer - who, often, has almost zero choice.

(And if you think you truly have choice as a consumer, I challenge you to use a phone that isn't running either Apple or Google's code.)

chroma an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I not sure how much we’re disagreeing here. Applying my argument of taxing externalities to certain food additives would result in taxes so high that it would effectively be a ban.

The externalities of integrated batteries are that people probably replace their phones sooner than otherwise, resulting in more electronic waste. But phones are only a tiny fraction of e-waste. Most e-waste is from household appliances, displays, & HVAC equipment. Phones are less 10%. I mean, how could it be otherwise? Phones are small and people use them for years before upgrading.

I’m not sure what the Android/iOS duopoly has to do with removable batteries. Mandating removable batteries would not change the operating systems available. And while there isn’t much choice in which OS you can run on a phone, there is enough choice that you can buy phones with removable batteries. If anything, this is an argument against mandating removable batteries, as governments are not mandating/subsidizing another phone OS despite far less choice in that area.

Lastly, I don’t see how banning people from having phones with integrated batteries gives them more choice. Most people (such as myself) don’t really care about removable batteries, and would rather have a phone that is smaller, cheaper, and/or more resistant to the elements. The way to give people the most choice is to tax externalities commensurate to the harm they cause, and let the market figure out what people actually value.

nozzlegear 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> (And if you think you truly have choice as a consumer, I challenge you to use a phone that isn't running either Apple or Google's code.)

Why doesn't this count as a choice? Was it more of a choice when Windows Phone was still around?

Nevermark 23 minutes ago | parent [-]

> Was it more of a choice when Windows Phone was still around?

Three viable options are by definition, more choice than two options.

john01dav 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Such phones with removable batteries are incredibly rare, such that finding one is quite likely to fail if you have any other concerns at all.

If a truly well made phone was common and made by many people, then there'd be much less argument for this regulation.

asdfasgasdgasdg 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What do you mean by "rare"? You just click "order". It's not like you have to go on the quest for the lost arc or anything like that. They are uncommon in the sense that people don't actually get them, but that's not because of a lack of availability. People do not want them.

ToValueFunfetti an hour ago | parent [-]

They mean the models are rare, not the devices. The claim is if you want feature X + removable battery, it's unlikely that you will find it. People's willingness to forgo the battery for feature X therefore doesn't tell you if people care about removable batteries in an absolute sense, just that they care relatively less than they do about feature X.

You could argue that the market already reflects people's desires via, eg., Apple's market research. They could argue that democracy in the EU also reflects people's desires.

chroma 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Phones with removable batteries are rare because only a small fraction of people want phones with removable batteries. Phone manufacturers also dislike removable batteries because customers buy cheap 3rd party batteries and complain when these batteries perform poorly or malfunction, sometimes by exploding. And then the headline is, “Phone made by company X explodes.” not, “Cheap battery explodes.” Removable batteries also introduce new failure modes like contacts degrading, causing phones to power off unexpectedly when jostled or flexed in certain ways. That increases the risk of a recall and bad PR.

I and millions of others want a phone that is smaller than the current offerings. Heck, my 13 mini is too big for my tastes. But I don’t think that means the government should force phone manufacturers to make smaller phones. So too for features like removable batteries, physical keyboards, or headphone jacks.

umanwizard an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

They're rare because outside of the tiny minority of people who complain loudly on HN, nobody cares about this feature.

bigbuppo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We weren't given a choice in the first place.

tracker1 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That assumes that the market itself is actually "free" and consistent and that there are no bad actors in the mix, and upstarts are allowed to freely start and compete. Given the regulations in the space that is emphatically not so.

Incumbents will remove and enshitify a number of features in order to maximize returns... Your new clothes dryer has a 10 year mechanical warranty.. but the control board isn't covered, will die in 12-24 months and won't be produced again. Oh and there's some clunky DRM in the mix on top. Guess you get to buy a new dryer, but this time you'll go with $OtherShittyBrandThatDoesTheSameThing.

chroma an hour ago | parent [-]

Aren’t newer washers/dryers full of electronics because of laws mandating higher efficiency? My parents have an old Maytag washer that uses around 30 gallons per load while my washer uses less than 8. I know Speed Queen makes dumb laundry machines, but at least one of their models was banned for residential sale by the Department of Energy. They ended up figuring out a workaround by gimping the default cleaning mode and encouraging users to not use that mode.[1]

But I don’t see how mandating removable batteries helps this situation with phones. I don’t replace my phone when the battery degrades, as it’s pretty cheap & painless to replace the battery after a few years. I upgrade when my phone stops getting security updates, or when a new phone comes along with some feature I want.

1. https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/speed-queen-revie...

phoronixrly 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This has been repeated so so many times... How can you be sure that throwaway glued-together phones are thinner and lighter than repairable phones.. If there is any source of this information, it's vendors who have interest in phones being non-repairable so they can ship more units...

How about vendors get on their asses and design thinner and lighter phones that are not e-waste from the moment they leave the factory?

I bet you when forced to make the right decision they can go even thinner and lighter than the current flagships...

tracker1 2 hours ago | parent [-]

For that matter, I put a chonky case on my phone anyway... would rather have a sturdier phone that doesn't need an additional case that has the features I'd like, including an easily replaced/swapped battery.

Beyond this, hell, make the "internal" battery solid-state with minimal capacity and have an external power pack from the get-go as part of case designs. Get the size of battery you want... if you want a big booty phone with battery for days, you can get it.

bartvk 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I get what you're saying but please be friendly here.

kergonath 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

FFS. Everything is a compromise. People who want smaller and lighter are not more wrong than those who want battery and physical protection.

cornyhorse 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Erm, I mean they kind of are given the massive externalities non user serviceable parts causes.

umanwizard an hour ago | parent [-]

E-waste is a minuscule rounding error compared to all the other forms of environmental destruction modern industrial civilization causes. European countries are massive polluters and net carbon producers (though not quite as bad as the US); e-waste shouldn't even be on their radar since it is a distraction from almost infinitely more important environmental concerns. People complaining about this don't actually care about e-waste, they just talk about it because it's convenient for their argument.

riversflow 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Earth's resources are finite, both in terms of raw materials and ability to absorb pollution. Stewardship of our resources entails the regulation of the things we create with those resources such that our collective consumption is conserved. Such oversight is both prudent, and as history and global outcomes teach, quite necessary.

kube-system an hour ago | parent [-]

I don't disagree with your statement, but an increase in design durability also does those things. A phone that you can drop and it doesn't break creates less pollution than a phone that you can drop and replace the screen.

asdfasgasdgasdg 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I feel like the fact that the phone-with-removal-battery option already exists and is not popular in the market should be a signal to EU politicians about how much the public actually values this capability.

wasmitnetzen 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I don't think the mobile phone market produces variety, somehow its market forces make it strive for uniformity. All phones are basically of the same from factor (with the two foldable ones being niches), roughly the same size, same battery, same connectors, one of two OS, etc.

Zarathustra30 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's the curb-cut effect. Just because the larger population doesn't demand something doesn't mean they won't benefit from it.

pfisch 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You can't buy an iphone with this functionality, and many people are locked into that walled garden for a lot of different reasons.

asdfasgasdgasdg 2 hours ago | parent [-]

That's fine, but even among Android users, nobody buys these removable battery phones. It's possible there's a disproportionate reservoir of iPhone&removable battery-only consumers, but it would surprise me if the desire for a reusable battery were strongly correlated with being locked into the Apple ecosystem. If anything, I would expect the propensity to desire removable batteries is more strongly correlated with Android use.

munk-a 2 hours ago | parent [-]

There are a plethora of reasons to prefer one phone to another and while removable battery phones exist if that's a strict criteria for you the market of available devices is extremely limited. Consumers don't have a real choice here.

asdfasgasdgasdg 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I would expect that one of the main reasons that people prefer non-removable battery phones are the engineering tradeoffs inherent in making a phone with a removable battery. They will have strictly less choice on this axis when they no longer have the option to buy a non-removal battery phone.

munk-a 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I think you are vastly overvaluing how much consumers actually value phone thinness. The majority of consumers use phone cases (most modern phones have a camera popup specifically to be better compatible with a case to this end) so I think what customers value the most is lighter weight - not smaller form factor. A replaceable battery does come with a slight compromise to weight but stopping the endless chase of thinness has several engineering advantages when it comes to ports and cooling.

asdfasgasdgasdg an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I don't think your speculation is completely unreasonable, but I just want to point out that consumer preference as revealed by current, actual reality only provides evidence in favor of my side of the argument. It's totally possible that the manufacturers are completely wrong about consumer preference and they are acting against their own interests by making the batteries non-replaceable, and somehow none of the manufacturers noticed this or were able to successfully take advantage of it to gain market share. But, I think that would be a pretty surprising thing if it turned out to be true.

Usually, in consumer electronics, the unencumbered market tends to gravitate toward what people actually want to buy. Totally possible this could be an exception to the rule, but I doubt it.

Filligree 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

I would prefer a phone that was robust enough to not need a cover, because covers add a great deal of size and weight.

In the absence of such phones, I compromise on adding a cover.

RedShift1 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

And 4 years old... I wouldn't buy this new

jbvlkt 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Better than average phone sold today. The only problem might be lack of android upgrades otherwise it is straight upgrade for most people. This is reason why replaceable battery is important. If you leave IT bubble people happily use ancient phones and do not need upgrades if battery is ok and there is space to save new photos.

wolvoleo 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There's a new model the 7 pro https://m.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_xcover7_pro-13780.php

badsectoracula 2 hours ago | parent [-]

No 3.5mm jack though :-/

joe_mamba 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The comment is not meant to give you something to buy, it's just proof that it can technically be done, they just don't want to do it for modern flagships.

nickpp 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> it can technically be done

At what cost though?! And no, I am not talking about money. Any device (and any product really) is a set of tradeoffs.

I like it when different producers select a different subset of priorities for their offer. Competition at work. One of the reasons we witnessed such an awesome evolution in the smartphone market.

I hate it when a bureaucrat dictates a set of demands with absolutely zero regard to the cost or the tradeoffs involved in product decisions and market competition.

user_7832 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> At what cost though?! And no, I am not talking about money. Any device (and any product really) is a set of tradeoffs.

My $200 Moto G3 in 2016 had a removable back cover (admittedly not battery). It was also waterproof (and had a headphone jack.)

The engineering of making things waterproof is in the realm of "A bit more annoying but easily doable if anyone's interested in doing it", not "Doable at the cost of everything else".

inanutshellus 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The tradeoff was discussed in a sibling thread: it's heavier by 58 grams and thicker by 2mm. That's it. That's the tradeoff. Why go crazy on the guy?

soperj 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's with the latest iphone, not the equivalent iphone from when this was released.

bigbuppo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So the fun plateau will be less pronounced and fun?

cicko 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I hate when a technocrat at a multi-billion dollar company makes those decisions, maximizing profit and not giving a fuck about any other criteria.

_ZeD_ 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> At what cost though?!

maybe just a little less margin for apple...

joe_mamba 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>I hate it when a bureaucrat dictates a set of demands with absolutely zero regard to the cost or the tradeoffs involved in product decisions and market competition.

It's because of those "bureaucrats", that car manufacturers were forced to implement catalytic converters and ECUs for emissions controls, and why the air in your city isn't a smog cloud like in the 70s.

I hate it when people assume the environmental and societal problems caused the unregulated free market, are gonna be fixed by the same unregulated free market which only optimizes for profit.

john01dav 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> I like it when different producers select a different subset of priorities for their offer. Competition at work. One of the reasons we witnessed such an awesome evolution in the smartphone market. > > I hate it when a bureaucrat dictates a set of demands with absolutely zero regard to the cost or the tradeoffs involved in product decisions and market competition.

I generally agree with that sentiment, except we don't have a vibrant market of many options with many different trade offs. Finding headphone jack, solid reparability, user swappable battery, easily replaceable USB port, and all the other things that one might want is basically impossible. The vast majority of phones are highly unrepairable, have no headphone jack, have everything soldered to a tiny number of internal boards, and are full of anti repair dark patterns.

elzbardico 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

GoToRO 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There is not waterproofing, on any phone. Yes, when you buy it, no after 3 years when the glue that waterproofs no longer sticks due to ageing.

chroma 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It really depends on the model, manufacturer, & luck. I’ve never had a phone lose its water resistance. The phone I use today (a 13 mini) is almost five years old and I clean it by running it under the faucet.

jlokier 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I cleaned a Samsung A53 under the faucet about 2 years after purchase brand new, using only a little water.

It failed soon after from water damage. I had to get it dried out and a new screen fitted, and some functions never worked properly since then.

I expected better as the specs claim IP67 ("Submersible in up to 1 meter of fresh water for up to 30 minutes"), and I used only a little water.

vel0city an hour ago | parent [-]

I'd return it if a brand new device that advertised IP67 died almost immediately under a normal sink water flow. Clearly it wasn't built to spec and one can't trust the rest of their manufacturing.

But I mean that's just similarly true of Samsung products. I avoid them like the plague. I haven't had a good Samsung device in almost 20 years, and used to be a Samsung fan

vel0city an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

I had a Pixel 6a last year bought not too long after it came out. I left it on a patio table. I was hosing things off and there was a significant amount of over spray on to the table. The screen died over the course of a couple of hours due to water ingreess.

david422 an hour ago | parent [-]

I just put my Pixel 10 through the washing machine by accident. To my surprise, it was perfectly fine.

vel0city 10 minutes ago | parent [-]

I definitely don't mean to call into question Pixel device robustness overall into question. I'm just trying to point out even well glued phones eventually develop weaknesses to their seams. And this was a device I routinely washed iin the sink to clean, it really caught me off guard when it failed.

lightedman 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"Yes, when you buy it, no after 3 years when the glue that waterproofs no longer sticks due to ageing."

My 2014 Kyocera Duraforce Pro is STILL waterproof and I use it for underwater photography incessantly.

k12sosse 3 hours ago | parent [-]

all that water is keeping the glue moist

lightedman 2 hours ago | parent [-]

No glue, it's all screws and gaskets.

thatguy0900 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm kinda surprised with esim, wireless charging and Bluetooth noones just made a phone with a solid layer of glass completely surrounding it for 100% waterproofing

chroma 2 hours ago | parent [-]

A lack of physical port makes troubleshooting more difficult. Apple didn’t remove the diagnostic port from their watches until the series 7. Also I think certain governments require that phones have a USB-C port.

HumblyTossed 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The two don't have to be mutually exclusive.

Also, it's water - resistance.

joe_mamba 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My low-cost plastic Casio watch based on a very old design is waterproof and battery can be swapped out by undoing 4 philips screws, no glue. Its buttons can also be operated under water while staying waterproof.

What is this whicraft?

kccqzy 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I normally much prefer screws over glue but Apple has at least been using repair-friendly glue like the electrically debonding adhesive in use for iPhone 16e/17e.

al_borland an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Making these devices repairable is not just about taking it apart, it's also about getting it back together. If I need to electrically debond the adhesive, then I'd also need to new strips of this special adhesive to hold the new battery in place. All of this is after needing a heat gun to weaken the adhesive just to get into it, which I assume also needs to be reapplied on reassembly to retain the same level of water and dust resistance.

It's not just a matter of buying a battery and using some tools the average person has on hand. A whole kit of specialty tools and parts needs to be ordered to facilitate the repair. Apple's own repair kit is the most extreme form of this, where they ship 70lbs of tools, which would be comical if it wasn't so sad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjsc6UypDOI

alt227 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Friendly for who? I certainly cant electrically debond chemical compounds, but I sure do know how to undo a screw.

SauntSolaire 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

And you can't follow a guide either? All you have to do is clip a 9v battery on.

Do you also consider yourself incapable of jump starting a car because you might have to look up instructions first?

alt227 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes. Dont assume that everybody is technically minded such as yourself.

I know plenty of people that would never even consider jump starting thei car. However are also quite happy with poppping open a battery cover and doing a simple swap like any other battery powered device.

SauntSolaire 2 hours ago | parent [-]

You don't have to be "technically minded" to figure this out. It's not spinning up a Kubernetes cluster, it's a picture with an arrow that says "Clip red wire here". Simply driving a car is a thousand times more complicated, and we expect most everybody to be capable of that.

There's also a difference between not wanting to do something, and not being capable of it.

alt227 an hour ago | parent [-]

You seem to judge the world by your own accument and ability, which is very dangerous.

Many milions of people are scared by things such as red and black wires and wont touch them with a barge pole.

SauntSolaire an hour ago | parent [-]

It's ridiculous to baby proof the world to that level. For a significant portion of that group, taking a screwdriver to their phone is also beyond comfort — those people can take their phone to a mall kiosk just like they do now.

blackguardx an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

It is probably a good idea to review some instructions before jump starting a car because even though it is simple, if you do it wrong (connect the battery terminal last) you can blow up your battery from the ignition of hydrogen gas.

SauntSolaire an hour ago | parent [-]

Agreed. But having to reference instructions is very different from being incapable of something, which was my point.

kccqzy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well yeah any glue is worse than screws: this I agree with you. But attaching a 9V battery to the glue is about the same difficulty as aligning the screwdriver with the screw and applying torque with a screwdriver.

kmeisthax an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

There's little metal tabs you can alligator-clip a 9-volt battery onto, which will release the adhesive. Way better than the stupid pull tabs you had to pull and roll in a very particular way in order to not tear them and render the battery unsafe to remove.

i_am_jl 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

An Apple product manager just fainted at the thought of a user taking a screwdriver to an iPhone.

luqtas 3 hours ago | parent [-]

not if they manage to find a screw head that can only be opened by a clean, minimalist, proprietary, expensive Apple screwdriver

bonestamp2 3 hours ago | parent [-]

You joke but...

https://www.homedepot.com/p/Lukyamzn-P2-P5-P6-Pentalobe-Scre...

At first it looks like a normal torx head, but then you realize it has 5 lobes instead of 6. Apple used these on early iPhone models when you actually could open them with this proprietary screwdriver.

ryandrake 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I get it for watches, but I've never understood the mass-market need for a waterproof phone, outside of a few niche hobbies. Are people showering and swimming with their phones or something? Or dropping them in their toilets? The wettest my phone has ever been in 8 years is in my pocket while it's raining.

chongli 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

People in humid climates and cold climates were regularly having their phones get denied warranty service because the water ingress stickers turned red due to condensation, without ever exposing their phone to water immersion. This was understandably upsetting for a lot of people who just wanted their phone to be fixed under warranty.

Thus, companies put in a big effort to seal their phones against dust and water, which ought to have dramatically reduced these service issues and led to a better customer experience overall!

catlikesshrimp 2 hours ago | parent [-]

There is waterproof specification levels. I haven't met one consumer product which doesn't let moisture in. I live in a hot country (not over 40ºC mind you)

If I not being precise, keeping your phone in your jeans deep tight pocket when you are sweating or raining will cause you problems. It might seem too many coincidences for you, but it is common enough that some of us avoid keeping the phone in the pocket.

seanmcdirmid 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Life happens, people want the assurance that their phone isn’t necessarily e-garbage after an accidental dunk.

jacobgorm 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It is not that long ago that smartphones would die from moisture exposure if you left them in the bathroom while taking a shower. I had a girlfriend around 2001 who spent all her savings on a shiny new Nokia 8250, got drunk and barfed on her jacket. The phone was in the pocket, and the moisture from the wet jacket completely killed it, she cried about it for weeks. I also remember my mother dropping her iPhone 6 in the harbor while getting off a boat, it got picked up but was dead. Last year I was out hiking in the rain, and my aging (5+ years old) iPhone 11 got water inside it and started dying soon after (I'd been sailing/swimming with the phone and had exposed it to salt water, apparently that will wear down the seals if you do it enough.)

In other words, I absolutely see the need for waterproof phones, even for ordinary people doing ordinary things, and am never going to buy one that isn't.

elzbardico 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I like to wash my phone under the tap, not getting paranoid of having it in a table close to the pool while drinking a few beers with my wife and friends, it is a really nice to have feature if you live in a warmer climate.

Angostura 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Or dropping them in their toilets?

That.

It’s also nice to be able to wash them under the tap

inanutshellus 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Notably a bigger problem for women who must put their phones in their back pockets due to having no/small pockets in front.

shmeeed 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The latter often goes hand in hand with the former.

vardump 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I like to wash my phones every now and then. Even submerging them in water.

throwaway894345 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Kayaking, fishing, river floating, surfing, diving, snorkeling, etc. "No one I know takes their phone snorkeling" <- that's because they're not presently waterproof, but I imagine a lot of people would like to take a high quality camera under water.

iberator 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

kayaks or hiking or fishing is like 40%% of entire population sole hobby in europe

__MatrixMan__ 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd rather have an 3.5mm audio jack

LaGrange an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Swimming. Lakes generally don't come with a securely closed box, and even if I come with company, they usually want to swim at the same time.

Of course I don't have to actually _use_ the phone while swimming, so it goes into a waterproof pouch - but having a 2nd layer of defense is nice.

umanwizard an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Are people showering and swimming with their phones or something?

Believe it or not, yes!

sophacles 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Tens of millions of people have outdoor hobbies that puts them in direct or incidental contact with water. Hundreds of millions live in places where rain happens. Billions live in situations where a spill of drinking water (or water based liquids) are a real risk for thier phones.

I don't want to take extra care and caution just to have a life and a fone. Theoretically this thing makes my life easier and I want it to act like it damnit.

fragmede 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What, you stop refreshing HN while you're showing?

estimator7292 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think it's mostly marketing. When all phones are identical glass rectangles, the only meaningful way to distinguish your product is by being the biggest, thinnest, highest IP-rating.

Most of these metrics are entirely orthogonal to what any real person wants from a phone, but that's an irrelevant detail to marketing types

creaturemachine 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes, people are so addicted to scrolling their idiotic looping videos that they take their phones in public pools. Saw it myself.

zahlman 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How do they waterproof around the screws?

Zak 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They don't. The screws are outside of the gasket: https://rmdd.net/writing/2023/sensor-watch/2.jpeg

kergonath 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Usually there is a gasket, which ages just like glue (it gets stiff and brittle) and should be replaced every decade or so.

exe34 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

technically you're meant to replace the rubber ring around it, but yes, not hard to do.

joe_mamba 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I actually never did. I think you're only supposed to replace it on those scuba-style watches with screw-on casebacks that shred the gasket when fully tightened to ensure a tight seal.

But on those watches with 4 screws on the case, the gasket seemed fine to me to keep reusing.

mikepurvis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think a lot of sealing rings / gaskets are meant to be single use. I had to swap the heater on my hot tub a while back and the store told me to change the o-rings on the inlet and outlet as it was unlikely the prior ones would re-seal after being loosened.

marcosdumay 3 hours ago | parent [-]

That's common on high-pressure systems. It's not very common on diving-depth water-proof equipment.

exe34 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Worse than I thought: https://support.casio.com/en/support/answer.php?cid=00900101...

"• To maintain water resistance, have the gaskets of your watch replaced periodically (about once every two or three years)."

al_borland an hour ago | parent [-]

It seems like the same can be true for the glue used on the iPhone.

> Splash, water, and dust resistance are not permanent conditions and resistance might decrease as a result of normal wear. Liquid damage is not covered under warranty, but you might have rights under consumer law.[0]

If a gasket has a predictable life, there could be a warning after that period that the water resistance may be compromised and to replace the gasket if this is a concern for how the user use's the phone. With glue, it seems less certain and Apple goes so far as to say even dropping your phone can compromise the seal enough to risk liquid damage.

Meanwhile, a G-Shock was designed to have a battery life of 10 years, have a water resistance of 10 bar, and survive a fall of 10 meters. Dropping the watch doesn't nullify the water resistance claims, the goal was to be able to do all of those things at once.

[0] https://support.apple.com/en-us/108039

exe34 5 minutes ago | parent [-]

I have had blackview "rugged" phones before - the only reason I had to give up on them was that they never update the OS and I couldn't get Lineage OS on them.

These things _do_not_break_. Once I rashly dropped mine on a concrete floor to show off to a friend. I regretted it immediately, thinking oh no, I didn't have to take it that far... it turned out it was completely fine. I washed it with soap when I got mud over it. It also weighed a ton in my pocket.

ok123456 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A gasket.

kaiwn 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The buttons can’t be operated underwater. You’ve been lucky thus far. Casio asks you not to use the buttons underwater.

https://www.casio-intl.com/asia/en/wat/water_resistance/

> Even if a watch is water-resistant, do not operate its buttons or crown while it is submersed in water or wet.

Pxtl 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Timex has been making iron-man watches held together with Philips-head screws that can withstand 100 meters of water pressure since the mid-1980s. Waterproofing is no excuse for this nonsense.

Aurornis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Watch cases are relatively huge for what needs to be inside them. You can see the difference between an entire smartphone and a simple time keeping device, right?

They also don’t have the long aspect ratio of phones (bending moment).

This doesn’t compare to phones at all. It’s like trying to compare your TI-83 calculator to a MacBook Pro

Pxtl 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Then use more screws. Stud them all the way down the perimeter of the back 1cm apart for all I care. Still better than heat-guns and prying.

vile_wretch 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Adding more holes to a surface isn't going to make it more waterproof

alt227 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Tell that to boat hull riveters

SigmundA 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Now go look up why they stopped riveting ships in the 40's and went to welding, there are no modern riveted ships. Even with the rivets they were forged not pressed, nothing like a screw.

Cheap aluminum boats are still riveted, welding preferred for obvious reasons. I have an old riveted aluminum John boat and is leaks through the rivets and seams...

alt227 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> there are no modern riveted ships

> Cheap aluminum boats are still riveted

I think you may need to think out your entire post before typing such contradictions.

Riveted hulls worked for hundreds of years and well maintained they can last forever. Just bacause welding makes it cheaper to maintain in the long run does not detract from the fact that riveted hulls are very performant, which is why they were used everywhere that needed not only waterproofing but pressure containment too.

sib 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

>> I think you may need to think out your entire post before typing such contradictions.

Ships != Boats

SigmundA an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Wood boats have been around for hundreds of years as well doesn't mean they are just as good in leak resistance to welded boats...

Ship vs boat is also not a contradiction.

giantrobot 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You'd be really interested to learn the difference between a rivet and a screw.

alt227 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Rivets use holes, exactly the thing the parent mentioned about not being waterproof.

changoplatanero 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

They also don't have speakers, microphones, and charging ports.

Pxtl 3 hours ago | parent [-]

My Galaxy Watch disagrees.

derekerdmann 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I once had a cheap Timex watch die from water ingress after running a track workout during a torrential downpour. At the time I joked that it only failed because we ran farther than the 100m rating

catlikesshrimp 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Is there any chance it was counterfeit (Timexx or so)

derekerdmann an hour ago | parent [-]

No. Bought in person at a Walmart in like, 2005

thechao 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think the USB & speaker are the weak links for water ingress. Also, a removable battery would (probably?) significantly weaken the phone. So, if you dropped it, it'd be more likely to sustain real damage.

AngryData 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't see them as very big weak points. USB doesn't have enough voltage to do jack in water even if you don't detect the water and turn it off. And the speaker can be made entirely out of waterproof materials, there are literally waterproof floating pool speakers you can buy for dirt cheap. The weak link is the main oring/glue as always.

GuB-42 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Is there any other details on what it means.

There is a difference between:

- Having a manufacturer promise that the battery will last with little oversight on how testing is done and no specific warranty.

- A lifetime warranty where any battery that gives less than 80% of its rating for 1000 cycles has to be replaced free of charge. With the added obligation that measurements should be user-readable and accurate (no cheating the cycle counter and battery gauge).

Worf an hour ago | parent [-]

> has to be replaced free of charge

I assume you mean the battery would have to be replaced free of charge. But what if I don't want to hand over a computer full of my personal data to a corporation with no oversight of how it will be handled? What if I can't afford to part with that computer?

I would be stuck with having to replace that battery on my own since I don't want to risk giving physical access to my computer to untrusted parties.

There needs to be a different way to handle this. For example, send me a new battery and the tools needed to replace it, with monetary compensation if certain features would be lost, like waterproofing. Or something else - not sure. But I don't believe in the honor of the people who would service my computer.

eszed an hour ago | parent [-]

> hand over a computer full of my personal data to a corporation

I'm equally paranoid, so I back up and wipe any device I hand in for repair.

> What if I can't afford to part with that computer?

No perfect answer for this, but I've always kept my last phone in a drawer in case my current phone breaks. It's saved me a couple of times. Maybe not everything works, but basic calls and texts always have, and I can use a browser for banking and other "complicated" stuff for a few days.

I'm OK if the perfect doesn't get in the way of the good - both personally, and in this sort of legislation.

Worf 33 minutes ago | parent [-]

Without sufficient technical information on how the computer works and without root access, we can't be certain a "wipe" will actually wipe everything.

For malware that could be inserted in a targeted manner, even with desktop computers we don't have access the every firmware of every part.

When we're talking about mobile "phones", we usually have an interface that tells us "sure, it's wiped", but is it? Without full root to every part of it, can you be certain that it is? When you press "wipe" on an iPhone or a closed Android flagship (or whatever the UI is), what happens exactly on the filesystem that you can't even access fully?

Telling people to hand over their devices willy-nilly is far from "good". We shouldn't settle for this. The hardware companies can ship us the tools to replace the battery ourselves. Maybe not "ourselves" - my aunt can ask me to do it for her if she can't do it on her own. But she trusts me more than she does people she's never seen ever. If the tools are expensive, we can ship them back. There are many options so we should discuss them.

josefx 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Didn't Apple once ship a patch to limit CPU performance on iPhones because battery degradation was a widespread issue?

wmf 10 minutes ago | parent [-]

Yes, but batterygate was about degradation of the battery current not capacity. Apple officially acknowledges that battery degradation exists; the only question is whether it's better or worse than 80%.

whazor 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Still, the majority of the population would get a phone with replaceable battery.

hamdingers 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

All the top smartphone manufacturers hit that bar, at least for their mid and high end phones. The focus on apple is misleading and weird.

This will only impact bottom barrel phones.

alt227 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Exactly. Apple and Samsung phones account for 90% of the market and are exempt fro mthis bill. So just how much ewaste will it prevent?

creaturemachine 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Remember ios 10.2.1? Batterygate?

hightrix 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That was 10 years ago. Are there any other instances similar that are more recent?

jeffbee 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"Remember the time Apple fixed iOS so the iPhone would run instead of crashing under low voltage conditions" remains, to me, the most inexplicable of HN's mass psychoses.

alt227 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Remember that they did it secretly and denied it for ages, only to backtrack and use this excuse when it was actually proven they were slowing the devices.

Dont let the marketing spin white-wash your long term memory of an event.

thunfischbrot 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

In my bubble, some. In the general population? Very very few.

SirMaster 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Huh, my iPhones have never come close to this. They are always under 80% capacity before 1000 charge cycles.

jvanderbot 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

unfortunately, it will be based on _design_ / _rated_ capacity, probably.

3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
criddell 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My iPhone 13 Mini is almost 5 years old and well over 1000 charges and the battery health app reports 81% which I believe.

catlikesshrimp 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Watch apple secretly defining 1000 charge cycles as 1500 10%-80% "normal use" days. (Remember the "full charge in 8 minutes fiasco? Well, I searched a reference but I didn't find any :/)

WesolyKubeczek 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

bluescrn 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

displayedBatteryHealthPercent = max(80, actualBatteryHealthPercent);

(I suspect the health figures displayed are already somewhat fudged to try and downplay the reality of battery degradation?)

nalekberov an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

1,000 charge cycles is hardly even 4 years. I’m not sure what this regulation is trying to fix. That ultimately means landfills will be filled with more iPhone Ns.

spockz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That had me thinking as well. What if the manufacturer says that to get to that number you are only allowed to charge it to 80% ever? My iPhone pro battery is at 92% at 417 cycles over 20 months.

sokoloff 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Do what EVs do: make 100% on the display not 100.0% electro-chemically and 0% not be 0.0% chemically.

This is a serious suggestion, as I think it’s actually net beneficial for the consumer.

Semaphor 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is already the case and has been so for a long time. But it's a trade off between longevity and capacity

LeifCarrotson 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The problem is that consumers want to buy a phone with 24 hours of runtime and an EV with 200 miles of range, and they want the phone to be thin and light and the car to be fast and light, and manufacturers want to achieve those capacities with as little electrochemistry as possible. The number of charge cycles at full capacity will be a big deal a year or two in, but on the sales floor it's a secondary concern for typical buyers and sellers.

Playing fast and loose with the numbers, I'm sure that if 100% on the display was 80% in the battery and 0% was 20%, you'd have an amazing number of charge cycles. You could program that 40% of unused capacity to be reduced as the battery ages very slowly, and by the time the used capacity is only at 80% of its original revealed capacity you're at many thousands of cycles. But you'd have a phone or car that weighed 40% more and cost 40% more than one that had no buffer and ran at the bleeding edge on day 1.

Absent breakthroughs in battery chemistry, this basically regulates the amount of buffer capacity that manufacturers are required to include in their ~~lies~~ marketing materials.

3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
creaturemachine 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There's no coming back from 0% chemically. Running li-ions that low results in physical damage.

wmf 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In that hypothetical scenario they should advertise 80% as the full capacity. Competition generally prevents this kind of "underclocking".

c0n5pir4cy 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So as far as I can tell, they can't do this as it's based on equivalent full-charge cycles - so that's nice at least.

znpy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wonder who’s gonna verify the claims about holding or not holdings 80% charge after 1000 cycles.

And what consequences will there be for whoever lies.

kjkjadksj 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Reminds me when I tried to warranty a macbook air battery a couple years ago. I was already under 80% within the warranty period per System Profiler. They hook up their diagnostics and turns out, System Profiler is wrong, I was at 81% capacity after 1 year. No repair for me.

vovavili 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wonder how much did the phone manufacturers spend on lobbying for this.

manoDev 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, and it's BS because in real usage iPhone batteries almost never reach this lifespan. Apple's lobby made this law ineffective, I hope customers start suing.

doctorpangloss 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Apple doesn't comply with regulations that weren't their idea with sincerity.

dheera an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can also just redefine the battery capacity so that 100% = former 80% and then add a paid subscription feature to "occasionally overcharge it by 25%"

/s

ThrowawayR2 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Doesn't seem like a problem. Assuming the phone needs recharging every 3 days, that's 80% capacity remaining after ~8.2 years; longer than the OS is likely to be supported. Assuming a recharge every 2 days, that's 80% capacity remaining after ~5.5 years.

wolvoleo 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's a pretty crazy assumption. I have to charge at least once a day on my flagship phone.

Granted, I hate big phones so it's a Samsung S25 smallest version but still. I don't know anyone who can get more than a day on a charge.

drivebyhooting 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My iPhone is less than 1 year old and I have to charge it every day.

wildzzz 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm guessing they use very conservative usage in their math. I'm on my pixel all day long but I barely use my iPhone 13 more than maybe an hour a day. I can leave it unplugged all weekend and come back Monday with enough charge to get me through the day.

alt227 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You have a very loose definition of recharge and charge cycle which seems to fit Apples marketing spin like a glove.