Remix.run Logo
sandreas 11 hours ago

If anyone from Motorola is reading this: Please add a smaller device to your Portfolio, about max the size of a Pixel 8. I'm not hoping for an audio jack any more but at least small it could be.

All in all: Thank you for making this possible.

simonmales 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The small form factor phones simply do not sell. Some great thoughts on the topic:

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iR9zBsKELVs * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZdbbN3FCzE Not about small form factor, rather enthusiast phones don't last

Currently running a Sony Xperia 5 V which farm factor is acceptable, and still will get a number of months of updates. And the winning point is that the bootloader can be unlocked and is supported by LineageOS.

rglullis 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The issue of "enthusiast phones" is not the same as for small phones. The problem that MKBHD is describing is that a company that starts as an enthusiast phone can not grow by getting the niche larger, so they need to start competing in the "average consumer" market. But a large, established company like Motorola and Samsung can for sure segment their product line to serve a particular demand.

I think the issue of small phones is that, while there people saying they would buy if it was available, no one is saying "I would buy one small phone at flagship prices, even if they don't have flagship features".

Zak 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I suspect there's a large overlap between people who want a small phone and people who only upgrade their phone when there's a pressing need. I am in both groups.

The root cause is that the phone is not a primary device for me. It's what I use when bringing a PC is too much trouble.

Milpotel 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> The small form factor phones simply do not sell.

And still in every phone topic people complain about phones being too big... I'd love to have a smaller affordable smartphone.

beeforpork 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Same here. And I have a friend who keeps his small IPhone because they stopped building smaller phones, too. There is a demand, maybe not that big.

For me, I want to be able to operate the phone with one hand, and the large screen makes it difficult to reach all the spots on the screen even with large hands. I do operate my Fairphone 5 with one hand, but it is super awkward and at some point, the phone will fall into a gully because I cannot hold it tight while navigating.

And I wouldn't mind 2mm more thickness if this means the cameras are flush with the back and the battery is larger.

happymellon 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> There is a demand, maybe not that big.

Whenever I see this when talking about small phones, I'm reminded of the stats, where the iPhone minis were a small proportion of iPhone sales but still by themselves outsold most manufacturers.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39104057

kirito1337 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

my sm-a260f is too smoll

paol 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I was in the same boat and literally this week bought a Pixel 8. It's a 2 year old phone but with the extended support period that's no longer a problem, and being old means you can get it new for about €300 or refurbished for even less.

The other option is the Samsung S2x line, which you can apply the same strategy to.

bombolo 7 hours ago | parent [-]

[dead]

TwoFerMaggie 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I watched the first video. One point they didn't mentioned is that their android example of the "last small flagship phone", asus zenfone 9/10, is about the same size as an iphone 12/13, not the mini.

Do regular iphones sell well? If so, the small flagship phones are not dead, because iphones are not dead. If iphones are not counted as small phones, then the small android flagship phones are dead long time ago.

Propelloni 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I run a Xperia 10 V. Great phone, great form factor, easy to unlock. It runs for days, almost a week, on one battery charge. Sony is doing something right here.

Tarsul an hour ago | parent [-]

I got the same or similar but let's not kid ourselves that this is in any way small. It would have been giant by 2015 standards. That's how much the overton window has shifted.

Aachen 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> small form factor phones simply do not sell

Are we really sure "nobody actually wants it"? I need to help my family select the smallest possible phone every time. Meanwhile choices are dwindling and the remaining 2 models are either overpriced or outdated and so I need to tell them it's better to take a (whatever currently goes for) "medium sized" model, which shifts upwards every time I/they need a new one. No wonder that people don't buy small phones anymore if they don't exist

I don't buy this nonsense about small phones being a niche when so many people are actively seeking them out, both online and offline in my practical experience

It's just harder to make, heat dissipation or battery will be restricted, doubly so if you're a niche manufacturer without a big budget, or one who tries to keep it repairable and needs the extra space for screws. So I can understand that Fairphone doesn't release a small model (even if it means I simply cannot use it: I actually put my money down and bought one, but sadly had to sell it onwards after a few weeks of trying) but for Graphenorola I'm not sure that restriction exists. It may just not please everyone if the chip is underclocked for heat and battery efficiency reasons and so they're not likely to. Doesn't mean there's no market for a small variant for any manufacturer that has more than one device on the market

My mom's and my current phone (same model) is what I'd call medium sized (per 2019 standards, when it was new) and the battery life sucks, but I'd buy this model again anyway if it came out with a ≥2025 SoC because I can actually use it unlike nearly any other phone on the market. Not properly reach the top, but at least the left side so that'll have to do

joe_mamba 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>And the winning point is that the bootloader can be unlocked and is supported by LineageOS

Don't banking, security and payment apps detect the unlocked bootloader and prevent them from working on lineageos? At least that's what happened to me after i flashed lineage on my old tablet.

Because then what's the point of a smartphone if it can't do banking, payment, shopping, ticketing, etc? Use it as a gimped pocket web browser and ebook reader? There's not gonna be any mass market adoption for such "smartphones" until they can run all apps out of the box like vanilla androids and IOS phones.

Your average consumer isn't gonna wanna fuck around with signing keys and bootloader relock. Hell, even this tech savvy HN user doesn't want to do that because he has better things to do with his time. The days from my childhood when I always rooted my Android phone, installed custom ROMs with custom kernels, magisk, titanium backup, cerberus to make the phone "my own" are long behind me.

carpenecopinum 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

There is the option to register the signing key of the ROM with the bootloader and then relocking it, thereby making those apps happy again.

The biggest issue is that there is a different way to do this for every device, so most custom ROMs don't bother. It's relatively simple and automatable for Pixel devices, so the GrapheneOS installer takes care of it. e/OS/, which is based on Lineage, allows this for some devices, iirc.

notpushkin 6 hours ago | parent [-]

DivestOS supported it, too. Probably the closest thing to LineageOS with a relockable bootloader (and it worked with microG!).

throawayonthe 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

(at least on pixels and apparently this future motorolla,) it can be re-locked, so it passes the integrity check; however there is an additional layer that needs google signing keys, which of course means you can't pass that one if you can't ship the keys

funnily enough my banking app works but the mcdonalds app doesn't, lol

szszrk 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Mcdonalds decided it's "unsafe" to run their app in private space of Android. In literally the most locked down part :) Marketing must have gotten a nice bonus for that mental effort.

I can run banking apps like that, corporate apps like that, but I can't show a QR code to order happy meal.

sunaookami 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can't even use the McDonald's app if you have an overlay. I use KineStop and in the car I'm already choosing what to order and I can't click anything until I turn off KineStop...

In comparison the Burger King app works without problems and is very fast.

bzzzt 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I've read about a few incidents where people could order for free or below cost so I'm not surprised their app developers are a little paranoid.

szszrk 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Could be related.

It was likely their management doing random shit to fix it. Instead of fixing real problem, which was bogus campaign rules. Reddit was full of people abusing their app discounts and ordering insane amount of food for free. It was well described.

None of that was due to app security holes. It was an issue in their promotional campaign. It was still working after those "secure" app limitations appeared.

joking 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

if you can order for free or below cost doing anything in the app, you are not paranoid, you are directly stupid, is like being able to modify the shopping cart total in the browser and the server accepting that as the correct price. Everything should be server side validated where you have the full control of it.

bzzzt 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Tell that to marketing types running coupon campaigns not realizing coupons are essentially money...

bombolo 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

kopirgan 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So you can send a remittance for $1m but not order fries. It believes that health is wealth.

lifis 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Switch to a bank that offers a fully functional web or Android app, as opposed to only allowing Google Android

Narushia 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Not possible in Finland. :( I'm using the one bank (OP) that used to allow rooted devices to use their app, but even they eventually blocked it via SafetyNet.

microtonal 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm all in favor of voting with your wallet, though easier said then done when your mortgage, long-term saving accounts, etc. are tied up with your bank account.

That said, my banking and credit card apps work fine on GrapheneOS.

jbstack 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What we need is a way for the OS to trick banking apps into thinking they are running on the platform they expect.

microtonal 7 hours ago | parent [-]

You cannot, the OS does not have that level of access. Attestation is anchored in a (typically) non-replaceable bootloader and trusted execution environment, both of which the OS does not have access to. A remote server can verify that the attestation chain is signed by a hardware-backed key and contains the verified boot status and verification key. If you would change this information, it would be detected by the remote server, since the signature would not be valid anymore.

KoolKat23 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Ironically I always find when these new devices like the fairphone come out, I'm disappointed and don't buy it because the screens are actually too small. They tend to focus on an unuseable middle point (probably in an attempt to please everyone).

All the flagships have huge screens, the big guys would have paid millions on market research, I can't understand why they arent just trying to achieve flagship parity (in terms of specs not price or software). No one is going to say it's unreasonable and they save themselves the market research

lofaszvanitt 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Oh, the guy who is still mentally on the level when he started his channel. And these shenanigans.... putting a phone in a mini coffin. sigh

Why it has to be a flagship? Sell them cheap. It's like AAA game makers cry about ballooning costs, and they make 60 hour games that literally nobody plays through....

Markoff 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> The small form factor phones simply do not sell.

yeah, clearly nobody buys Samsung Galaxy S series for years, they are like the least popular Android phone model... /s

I'm running Pixel 6a (which was followed bu successors with worse screen:body ratio for years and only now the new Pixels finally matched and slightly improved the ratio, what a progress), but considering all the HW issues (baterries and displays) with Pixels I'd rather avoid it, the worst case will buy as next phone Xiaomi and hopefully somehow unlock it, if there is no suitable Motorola

edit: added HW issues explanation since I am rate limited on comments

dzonga 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

yeah pixel used to be great. probably the best phone I ever owned after iPhone SE was a Pixel 3a.

till I got the abomination that was a pixel 6a. fucking overheated - then finally battery exploded. Other pixels suffer the same problems as well - overheating n display being finnicky.

arboles 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What are the HW issues with Pixels?

jsheard 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> yeah, clearly nobody buys Samsung Galaxy S series for years, they are like the least popular Android phone model... /s

I don't think the smaller Galaxy S models are what people generally mean when they talk about small phones, those are still much bigger than the iPhone Mini was.

https://www.phonearena.com/phones/size/Samsung-Galaxy-S26,Ap...

Markoff 6 hours ago | parent [-]

it's literally one of the smallest Android phones with good specs

here you have filtered Android phones since 2020 under 71mm with OIS camera

https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?nYearMin=2020&nWidthMa...

it's basically just Samsung S series, Pixels, overpriced bad value Sony and few exotic/abandoned phones (Asus is done with phones, they had always horrible SW, Xiaomi only model 12 many years ago, Meizu not available outside China)

throwaway81523 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The whole Moto G series has audio jacks, at least as of a year or so ago. I hope that Graphene makes it to those affordable models. I don't need high end cameras or AI on my phone. In fact AI is quite unwanted.

embedding-shape 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think I went through the first ~3 or so generations of the Motorola Moto G, and they were great for the price, besides the fact that each generation it got bigger and bigger, defeating the original motivation I bought them in the first place. Eventually the iPhone 12 Mini was released and I moved to iPhone at that point.

I also hope that the new GrapheneOS device from Motorola will be in the "smaller" size factor so it actually fits in my (apparently) tiny hands, but to be honest I'm probably getting one regardless, as iOS gets worse and worse every time I update it.

panny 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Lol, no, according to graphene, an aux jack is a security problem. So is a microsd. But the hole punch with the camera pointed at your face, that's just fine.

When my current phone dies, I'm basically returning to a dumb phone with a removable battery. Now that Xperia dropped open source, every phone out there is terrible and I just don't want any of them. Anything that would support a ROM has features to make my skin crawl.

_vere 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Their hardware requirements do not say this, where'd you get that idea? Graphene has stated they'll work with the Motorola team on supporting their devices, starting with the successors of the Razr foldable and the signature line, but there really hasn't been any talk about how additional peripherals like aux would be a no-go. USB is also a security concern, which is why they give you the option to disable it outright, disable data or disable until after-first-unlock. I don't see what would keep them from implementing this for aux, although since it's unidirectional I'm not sure if it even makes sense to compare aux to USB. They've supported pixels with aux ports in the past, and I don't think it's inclusion would be a blocking criteria. The comment about the camera is also kinda misguided. They zero out the camera input if you disable it, unlike traditional android. You can have a camera toggle in your quick settings and keep it disabled literally all the time. Enabling it when you bring up any camera related app takes either pin or biometrics, having the hardware here really shouldn't be a concern since you can look at how the code handling it works yourself. I'm not trying to convince you to use a pixel or a Motorola phone, do what you want, but at least be informed about stuff like this when you state things as if they are facts.

Aachen 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> I don't see what would keep them from implementing this for aux, although since it's unidirectional

No electric circuit is unidirectional. Beyond the pause/play and volume commands that it supports (edit: and mic as mentioned in a sibling comment), Graphene would probably reason it's an easy way to externally read voltage levels and so an unnamed entity can mount side channel attacks with backdoored headphones

RobotToaster 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> since it's unidirectional I'm not sure if it even makes sense to compare aux to USB

Most phone aux support microphones and acting as an antenna for FM radio reception. I don't see how either could be used for a security exploit however.

panny 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>but there really hasn't been any talk about how additional peripherals like aux would be a no-go.

It's water under the bridge. You're NEVER getting a Graphene phone that supports a microsd. It won't happen. The AUX jack, you will biligerently be told to get a USB DAC or otherwise you are an old man yelling at clouds.

Graphene and Motorola will work together by happy accident. Tell ya what though, if they make a GrapheneOS phone with 3.5mm, dual sim, microsd, and >no notch or hole punch< and I will buy it. I won't even care how much it costs. All the Xperias I've owned were among the most expensive phones on the market.

_vere 7 hours ago | parent [-]

It's unlikely for the Razr line to support microsd since those are foldables, and flagships like the signature line generally tend not to, but nowhere on their hardware requirements list does it say that a potentially supported device cannot have a microsd card slot, thats just wrong. There is nothing about a memory slot that would make the phone less safe inherently, they already support USB drives, internal emmc memory isnt that much more crazy than that, right? I just think its super weird to be like preemtively mad at them for an imagined aversion to supporting hardware that doesnt exist. I get that the people involved with the project can be a little prickly when you ask them for advice about stuff, but what do you expect them to do here? They support the devices they do not out of some sort of adherence to a skewed model of security, they actually genuinely need the hardware to be able to do all of the things they ask for, which currently literally only the pixel line offers. If a manufacturer like Sony who tends to do aux, microsd slots and no holepunch cameras were to adapt to their hardware standards (https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices) there would likely be an effort by people to get these supported, its not the lack of will from the devs, its the lack of support from phone manufacturers that has kept the line of supported devices constrained to pixels.

throawayonthe 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

why do you say "according to graphene?" have they said those things? or do you just mean the currently supported devices don't have these

sheiyei 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's a shame that modern banking (and communication with my family) needs a smartphone.

Aachen 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Does it? My banking works in any browser that supports javascript, and chatting has been possible on desktops (and laptops etc.) longer than it has on phones

fsflover 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> When my current phone dies, I'm basically returning to a dumb phone with a removable battery.

Why not a smartphone with the jack, microsd, and a hardware kill switch for camera?

Aachen 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I haven't found a >=2025 phone (I started looking in the summer) with a headphone jack that I can actually use more conveniently than a tablet. Everything now requires two hands, not counting warrantyless china phones like the jelly star, or ones with a chipset that would have been considered fast in 2018

As for the camera, a webcam sticker seems much more convenient than needing to mess with the hardware internals

fsflover 5 hours ago | parent [-]

> haven't found a >=2025 phone

Why such a restriction?

> or ones with a chipset that would have been considered fast in 2018

https://puri.sm/posts/the-danger-of-focusing-on-specs/

> webcam sticker seems much more convenient

Except there is also a microphone.

> than needing to mess with the hardware internals

What do you mean? My phone has a convenient, external hardware kill switch. No messing with internals is necessary.

Aachen 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> Why such a restriction?

Sorry, that wasn't clear: I meant any phone that I can purchase as of 2025. I was looking for several months and made a decision about 2 months ago. A second-hand Pixel was a big compromise but I don't see another option

> https://puri.sm/posts/the-danger-of-focusing-on-specs/

Do you also have thoughts to add or am I supposed to read and respond to 2000 words of material here?

The reason I'm looking at specs is not because I have no idea what I need. Not sure if there's another possible reading or if the link insinuates that. The software I use (e.g.: OsmAnd) is noticeably faster on more modern systems and was downright sluggish on my previous phone. I could buy my current chipset again, it's doable for now, but neither fluent nor future-proof. The chip's inefficiency also means it's completely empty after 2.5 hours of use (while I'm out mapping, taking notes, recording positions and sometimes pictures, listening to music... I ask a lot of the battery), whereas newer chips can do the same work with less energy

I also need a modern chipset for accurate GNSS. The phone I get from work has dual-frequency GNSS and makes razor sharp traces which are much more usable for my mapping hobby, especially in urban or forested areas or behind coated windows like trains or cars (car navigation isn't that niche, my current phone does a pretty poor job at that)

But yeah, let's not focus on specs. Who cares about any of this right? That's what I'd say if I sold a really basic phone

> Except there is also a microphone.

Respond to the person above. Hardware toggles wasn't my argument but theirs. Great that your librem has this but the thread is about GrapheneOS

Edit: lol that was yourself. You posted about a camera toggle, not me or anyone else

M95D 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Modern dumb phones are just smartphones with a dumb UI.

Aachen 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Citation needed. A lot of dumb phones still only support 2g, for example, and you need to watch out that you don't buy a model that won't work anymore when carriers take that off the air. No smartphone hardware has that issue

venusenvy47 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Also Motorola, make this phone available in the US: https://m.gsmarena.com/motorola_edge_50_neo-13224.php

It's the smallest phone available with a real telephoto lens. I think it was only available in India, but I got one on eBay because it has those two features (not huge with telephoto) I was looking for. I moved to it from a Pixel 6a because I refuse to go any bigger in physical size.

coldpie 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Check out their Razr Plus or Razr Ultra. The external display is 4" and fully functional, and it unfolds into a full-size phablet for when you need that. I'm a small-phone-liker and I've found it to be a great device, I'm very happy with mine.

amunozo 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I was thinking the same thing. My smartphone is reaching the end of its life, and I really like something smaller.

babuskov 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

+1 from me.

Motorola has such great quality/price ratio and the user experience is decent. There's still some nagging and such but overall it's much better than the competition.

But I still can't get over my old iPhone 6. That phone size was just perfect. Easy to hold and do everything with one hand, easy to fit into any pocket.

I really want an Android like that. I don't need 3 cameras and bunch of other nonsense.

a-french-anon 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's "small"? Here I am with my 5.2" Xperia XA2 thinking I'll be forced to go back to dumbphones in the future... along with many others, I guess.

Aachen 6 hours ago | parent [-]

No, it's not small, but it's afaik the smallest model you can find that's still unlockable and runs any ungoogled OS

> I'll be forced to go back to dumbphones in the future... along with many others, I guess.

Going back to a dumbphone for me would mean changing my outdoor hobbies (like contributing to openstreetmap), so I'll take my losses and continue on a smartphone, but I share the sentiment. Power to you if you do it!

hsbauauvhabzb 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Would a flip phone suffice?

raffael_de 9 hours ago | parent [-]

wouldn't trust a flip phone with a display fold. i want small, thin and light.