Remix.run Logo
andsoitis 4 hours ago

> I really don't understand those investors and how they price a struggling company so highly.

Struggling, not so much: '24/'25 revenue of just under $100B, with Q3'25 record profitability and deliveries yielding $1.5B net income. Strong liquidity and a current ratio of about 2, boosting short-term financial stability. Solid cash reserves and relatively low debt ratio.

High stock price: far exceeds that of traditional auto makers even though Tesla's revenue is significantly lower. High valuation reflects investor expectations of growth and future tech upside. Exuberant? Probably. OTOH, Tesla has delivered better ROI for investors than the other automakers.

fsh 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Tesla is probably the only EV maker with declining sales for the last two years. Quite a feat in a booming market, and remarkable considering that the stock already has a few orders of magnitude of growth priced in.

epistasis 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Ah, but you missed the pivot, Tesla is no longer an EV maker, it's now a robotics company.

This fully explains the market valuation, of course! Never mind a swarm of retail investors driven by a news media that covered Musk as if he were Tony Stark for years, this market cap is fully based on solid fundamental analysis of expected future revenue.

zdragnar 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is an interesting take, considering several EVs from traditional manufacturers have been canned entirely.

Tiktaalik 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The EV market is booming outside of NA. EV growth share in Europe is remarkable and Tesla is flatlining there while everyone else advances.

iknowstuff 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Lack of FSD in Europe. If they manage to get it approved in 2026 expect that to reverse.

array_key_first 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I really, really doubt FSD is the limiter of European sales. It's pricing and competition. The US car market is laughably uncompetitive, with most manufacturers opting to make luxury landboats. It's easy to compete when all your competitors refuse to introduce an EV under, like, 50 grand.

apexalpha 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Probably also the no lack of Nazi salutes on TV and his political ‘escapades’.

iknowstuff 2 hours ago | parent [-]

He appeared at an AfD thing

apexalpha 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I am well aware that clip mustve been played thousands of times. He really had no clue how politics work here.

The people voting Afd et al. are NOT people buying EVs. The venn diagram of those groups is two circles.

verdverm 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

US auto is not the trend setter here. BYD is crushing it by comparison

cyberax 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

EVs are in the Cambrian Explosion state in China right now. There are dozens of companies fiercely competing on price and features.

The two most popular EVs in China are the Wuling Mini and the Geely Xingyuan. The first one costs $4500 for the base model, and the second one is $9800. And you can get a very decent EV for $15k with plenty of options.

In 2-3 years, these $5k and $10k cars will only get better, and they'll just slaughter all the competition in markets outside the US and Europe. Especially once used cars start appearing at a fraction of the cost.

Traditional auto manufacturers are dead. Full stop. They just haven't realized it yet. Tesla had a chance to compete in this market with Model 2 but Musk decided to blow their lead on a completely stillborn and gimmick-filled robotaxi.

renewiltord 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The declining sales is a concern. Was curious though so I looked it up and Tesla is currently selling more than Volkswagen, Ford, Rivian, Mercedes, and Toyota combined. Interesting.

The big dog is BYD though. Twice as many as 2nd place Tesla.

andsoitis 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Was curious though so I looked it up and Tesla is currently selling more than Volkswagen, Ford, Rivian, Mercedes, and Toyota combined. Interesting.

Indeed. Global 2024 data shows Tesla selling about 1.8M. EV's only by that group of automakers comes to around 1.5M. Toyota and Ford are hybrid-first, not EV. VW is the only legacy automaker that comes near Tesla's EV scale. Mercedes prioritizes margin over volume. Rivian is capacity-limited.

foobarian 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Figured that metric is for EV only, which is not that surprising. But even for overall sales it's #11 on the list for first 3 quarters of 2025, which is not too shabby: https://www.carpro.com/blog/2025-year-to-date-u.s-auto-sales...

andsoitis 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> Figured that metric is for EV only, which is not that surprising.

But it is stunning that legacy automakers are sticking to fossil fuels.

LunaSea 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The infrastructure just isn't there to make EVs interesting for a lot of people in the US and EU.

They also know that this means that the EU will push the target date for the end of fossi fuel cars.

bagels 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

EVs or vehicles generally?

mxschumacher 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

there was a rush to buy electric cars in the US for as long as the $7500 incentive was in place, so the Q3 2025 number if inflated; it's a pull forward effect.

Sales have been flat for 3 years and the delivery numbers in Europe are catastrophic

on a fully diluted basis, the market cap is above $1.6tn, so at a PE of 20, they'd have to generate something like $80bn in profit per year - hard to do in an industry that is as brutally competitive and low margin as passenger cars.

abirch 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Not to mention China heavily subsidizing BYD.

eagleislandsong 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's a myth that China heavily subsidises its EV industry. See e.g. this Bloomberg article titled "China Can't Cut EV Subsidies It Isn't Paying": https://archive.ph/5olix

abirch 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

From the article that you added in addition to the statements below, I don't think BYD is succeeding only by subsidies. I'm solely stating that they're heavily subsidized. China has a strategy where most western nations don't appear to have one.

----

It might be tempting when one has been asleep at the wheel to chalk up the rise of Chinese carmakers led by BYD to unfair subsidies, especially since leaders in Washington and Brussels have done so. No doubt, China is far from a free, fair and open market. The scale and pervasiveness of corporate subsidies at the federal and local level far exceed what other market-based economies offer.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-10-17/byd-s-...

----

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-10/china-s-c...

overfeed an hour ago | parent [-]

> China has a strategy where most western nations don't appear to have one.

EVs were subsidised in the west, e.g. in California (#4 "country" by GDP), Norway, and US tax incentives - which have gone away after the Trump anti-renewables Bill of 2025. MRSPs for EVs were slashed after September 2025 due to the loss of this subsidy, and 2 months later Ford cancelled it's electric F-150 program.

dzhiurgis 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How come BYD’s stock price is essentially flat?

Analemma_ 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Lately I've realized that "Chinese subsidies" are psychologically useful for people outside China to believe in, as cope to handwave away their own failing industries. Solar panels aren't really subsidized in China either.

abirch 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

China has a plan. It subsidizes technology that it sees as important. There's nothing wrong with that per se.

It'd like me saying that Barry Bonds only won the home run records because he used steroids. It wasn't entirely the steroids but I'm sure they certainly didn't hurt.

happosai 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Currently Chinese are competitive because because developers work on burnout level intensity and workers have no life but factory around the clock.

Of course, the salaries and working conditions are going up in China while west is eroding worker rights as fast as we can. One the factories will come back here simply because we'll end up cheaper. Don't buy solar made by Xinjiang forced labor, by solar panels made by illegal immigrant prison labor!

mxschumacher 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

there are around 140 EV companies in china competing very aggressively, they have excess capacity and are flooding the world market with cheap EVs, tough for Tesla to have a healthy margin in that environment

vkou 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

BYD's exports are not subsidized, and are, in fact, a massive cash cow for the firm.

They are also way cheaper and at comparable quality to western cars.

pretzellogician 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Q3'25 was a known blip due to the rush to get the $7500 U.S. tax break, which IIRC, even Elon noted.

Retric 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Past performance is meaningless here.

They lost the massive US subsidy making EV’s appealing and are getting outcomes in China. Model E and Cybertruck have anemic and shrinking sales numbers etc.

hvb2 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Model E?

Retric 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Sorry Model X, a friend calls their’s an E as in the letter grade.

I sometimes forget that’s not the real name, which gets confusing.

AnimalMuppet 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

1.5B net on $100B revenue is not great. 1.5%? If that's not struggling, it's uncomfortably close.

andsoitis 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> 1.5B net on $100B revenue is not great. 1.5%? If that's not struggling, it's uncomfortably close.

You're misreading. $100B annual revenue. 1.5B quarterly new income.

Q3 2025 was record revenue of $27B (up 12% YoY). Operating margin was 5.8% (down from 10.8 Q3 2024).

Why the lower profitability? Higher expenses for AI and R&D costs, lower EV prices (very strong competition), etc.

jedberg 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For comparison, GM brought in $1.3B on $48B.

mxschumacher 4 hours ago | parent [-]

and Tesla is valued at over 21x more than GM

awesome_dude 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitable, the same profit on half the revenue

How does that justify Tesla's valuation?

Is it based on the idea that the margin can be improved?

andsoitis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitable

You got it reversed.

For Q3'2025, GM net income $1.3B on $48B revenue (down 0.3% YoY). Tesla, in contrast, generated $1.5B income on $28B revenue (up 12% YoY).

GM's income was down 56.6% while Tesla's was down 37%.

GM had higher operating income than Tesla, however. Explained by Tesla's more aggressive investment in R&D and AI.

awesome_dude 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Ah, got it now, thanks

moogly 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's based on "Tesla shareholders want the stock to live in a parallel universe".

boplicity 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Look at the free cash flow, and the situation looks maybe even worse. They're basically not worth much, if anything, from a free cash flow perspective.

elAhmo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> High valuation reflects investor expectations of growth and future tech upside.

Yeah, sure.

lawn 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That the stock has gone up a lot does not mean it will continue going up.

On the contrary, Teslas remarkably high stock price means it's less likely to go up and a big correction is more likely.

stingraycharles 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It has delivered a better ROI in the same way a ponzi scheme can deliver higher ROI.

andsoitis 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> It has delivered a better ROI in the same way a ponzi scheme can deliver higher ROI.

It sounds like you're arguing that high valuation compared to fundamentals means buyers expect gains from future buyers paying more sounds like a Ponzi, but it isn't, it is speculation.

The comparison doesn't make sense. Some surface features of speculative markets can look Ponzi-like, but the underlying mechanics are very different.

A Ponzi-scheme returns to earlier participants directly from money contributed by later participants, with no real underlying business generating value. In a Ponzi-scheme, there is no real product (or it is irrelevant), the operator controls payouts, and investors are promised steady or guaranteed returns. None of that applies to Tesla stock.

Ponzi-schemes hide losses, smooth returns, collapse suddenly. Tesla stock is volatile, has had large drawdowns, and public reflects bad news, margin compression, demand shifts. Volatility is a sign of a market, not a Ponzi.

boroboro4 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Mechanics is exactly the same - it's not Tesla revenues driving returns for investors, it's new investors putting their money into the stock at very high price.

andsoitis an hour ago | parent [-]

If you believe Tesla is a Ponzi scheme then you also believe that the SEC is either knowingly keeping a Ponzi scheme going (and it is getting included in indexes) OR the SEC doesn’t know OR you are wrong.

knuppar 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> collapse suddenly

If BYD was in the US I think we could check this box reeeeaaally quickly. It would make Tesla irrelevant.

awesome_dude 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We have BYD here, it's a stiff competitor for Tesla, but it's not end game for Tesla material.

I personally prefer a BYD, Musk has damaged his brand by being so political, but the BYD product is (IMO) superior.

Having said that BYD isnt without its issues (eg. over reporting of range)

andsoitis 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> If BYD was in the US I think we could check this box reeeeaaally quickly. It would make Tesla irrelevant.

Why? What's your logic?

array_key_first 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The cars are higher quality and, more importantly, cheaper. US manufacturers can't make a cheap car to save their lives. The average age of cars on US roads is now 13 years, nobody can afford new cars.

There's a huge market opportunity here that all our manufacturers are missing, seemingly on purpose. BYD, and others, would absolutely sweep the competition.

overfeed an hour ago | parent [-]

> US manufacturers can't make a cheap car to save their lives.

They have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders to never make low-margin (read "cheap") cars. If someone is looking for a competitive automotive market, they won't find it in the US. The financial engineering is world-class though.

vkou 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

BYD makes good, cheap cars. There's a reason why the US raised every protectionist barrier against it - it would destroy Detroit.

majormajor 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> In a Ponzi-scheme, there is no real product (or it is irrelevant)

This part is the smell.

"It's not a car company, it's a AI/Robot/whatever company." The valuation is supposedly justified by a future product that perpetually fails to materialize.

It's obviously not a classical Ponzi scheme in the mechanical sense where payouts are controlled by a central party. It has major Ponzi vibes though, with new money continuing to reward old money even though the fundamentals and products haven't done anything to justify that continued influx - only the hype has.

stingraycharles 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah, the target keeps moving. Earlier it was “it’s not a car company, it’s a battery company”. Then it was all about FSD and robotaxis. Now that that is not working out, it’s going to be a robot company.

The actual underlying product, the cars, don’t match the crazy valuation.

andsoitis an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Ponzi schemes don’t make $100B revenue, traded on the stock exchange, or make profit.