Remix clone Hacker News

new | show | ask | jobs Github

▲

AnimalMuppet 4 hours ago

1.5B net on $100B revenue is not great. 1.5%? If that's not struggling, it's uncomfortably close.

▲

andsoitis 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> 1.5B net on $100B revenue is not great. 1.5%? If that's not struggling, it's uncomfortably close.

You're misreading. $100B annual revenue. 1.5B quarterly new income.

Q3 2025 was record revenue of $27B (up 12% YoY). Operating margin was 5.8% (down from 10.8 Q3 2024).

Why the lower profitability? Higher expenses for AI and R&D costs, lower EV prices (very strong competition), etc.

▲

jedberg 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For comparison, GM brought in $1.3B on $48B.

▲

mxschumacher 4 hours ago | parent [-]

and Tesla is valued at over 21x more than GM

▲

awesome_dude 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitable, the same profit on half the revenue

How does that justify Tesla's valuation?

Is it based on the idea that the margin can be improved?

▲

andsoitis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Sorry, I lost the thread - GM looks twice as profitable

You got it reversed.

For Q3'2025, GM net income $1.3B on $48B revenue (down 0.3% YoY). Tesla, in contrast, generated $1.5B income on $28B revenue (up 12% YoY).

GM's income was down 56.6% while Tesla's was down 37%.

GM had higher operating income than Tesla, however. Explained by Tesla's more aggressive investment in R&D and AI.

	▲	awesome_dude 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Ah, got it now, thanks

▲

moogly 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's based on "Tesla shareholders want the stock to live in a parallel universe".

▲

boplicity 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Look at the free cash flow, and the situation looks maybe even worse. They're basically not worth much, if anything, from a free cash flow perspective.