| ▲ | OptionOfT 9 hours ago |
| The fact that I get excited about this is actually a good representation much vendor lock there is. We used to be able to send files over Bluetooth before the iPhone came out. |
|
| ▲ | creaturemachine 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Ever since the iphone apple has been trying to make you believe files aren't a thing. |
| |
| ▲ | rpdillon 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The file system is the ultimate API, and it gives the user an enormous amount of control to take data, copy it, back it up, transform it, encrypt it, send it places, restore it, etc. Apple likes to have far more control than that. | | |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | You realize that you can copy files gl and from other providers like Google Drive, Dropbox etc from the files app on iOS just like you do on any GUI and you can also copy files from the iPhone by just plugging in a USB C mass storage device? |
| |
| ▲ | Angostura 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because Apple realised that phone users are interested in photos, videos, contacts, documents, appointments etc. not files | | |
| ▲ | tuetuopay 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Despite others thinking you’re crazy, I think you are right. I remember the start of the smartphone era where many of my relatives switched to iPhone because "you know where the pictures are going and where to find them". The worst offender was my dad that had a Samsung phone running windows phone 6 (with an actual start menu) where you had to dig through folders to find jpeg files. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Desktop OSs are the worst for mixing random system files with the users own documents. Theres a better balance now where the “Files” app has your documents, downloaded stuff and similar, while system and app data is hidden. | | |
| ▲ | pxc 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Isn't that pretty much just Windows? That basically never occurs on Linux and it's not common on macOS, either. All the garbage I have on my work computer (a Mac) in ~/Documents is stuff that OneDrive synced over from when I used to have a Windows computer there. (If I could turn the OneDrive feature that takes over ~/Documents and ~/Downloads, I would.) |
|
| |
| ▲ | standardUser 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | But what they own is files. Most users aren't interested in mutual funds, but that doesn't mean they don't want them in their retirement portfolio. | |
| ▲ | kakacik 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | One reason I'll never own an apple device, and prefer buying more expensive more open competition. Its just a red line - I own the device by law, if you bend backwards to prevent me from using it via ways that it supports by principle, your product doesn't exist for me. | | |
| ▲ | vovavili 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | You are not Apple's target audience, and there is nothing wrong with that. |
| |
| ▲ | Gud 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And files… | |
| ▲ | babypuncher 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A file system and its files are a very simple abstraction that lets us organize these exact things. I understand that some people get confused and overwhelmed by a directory structure, but I see that as an education problem, not a UX problem. I was taught all of this in elementary and middle school computer classes in the '90s and early '00s. Having this knowledge early on made me less afraid of my computer, made it feel less like a magical black box, and gave me the confidence to learn more complex topics on my own. Computers become way more capable when the people using them understand fundamentals like directory structures and command line usage. I don't think either of these things are as difficult to learn as reading, writing, and arithmetic (especially if you already have a base level education in those three things). If more "everyday people" just had a little bit more knowledge about these things, they would be able to do way more with their computers with less of a reliance on proprietary solutions that funnel them down whatever path makes someone else the most money. | | |
| ▲ | 8note 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | its a UX probpem insofar as service providers will decide that since they give you a view over the file system, thats enough. i want file system access, but as a power tool. the 50 clicks through different folders is irrelevant to my most common 5 patterns of use. those should be a single click, or 0 clicks |
| |
| ▲ | digdugdirk 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | ... This is a joke... Right? | | |
| ▲ | supertrope 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | "Dad, download the PDF and then email it to me." "The file disappeared. I can't find it." "Look in the download folder." "How do I get to that?" |
| |
| ▲ | wkat4242 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | iOS isn't just a phone OS. | | |
| ▲ | 1-more 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | It is. The other OSes have different names. | | |
| ▲ | iknowstuff 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Only so they could pretend that iPhones and iPadas are separate platforms under DMA | | |
| ▲ | Marsymars 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | I generally agree that iOS/iPadOS aren't two different operating systems, but "iPadOS" predates the DMA. | | |
| ▲ | giobox 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Barely... the iPadOS brand was introduced in 2019, the European Commission proposed the DMA in 2020, and even prior to this there were obvious noises being made in Europe with regards to future regulation. Maybe its coincidence, but the timing still lines up for this being a response to the threat of EU changes. | | |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 22 minutes ago | parent [-] | | So Apple preemptively split the names because they knew exactly how the unreleased DMA was going to affect them? |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | tgma an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Steve Jobs, 2007: "iPhone runs OS X" | | |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes - it’s not like they have had a literal app called “Files” since 2017 and if you install apps like Dropbox, OneDrive, Google Drive etc they all show up in the Files app and are choosable destinations from any app that uses the Files dialog… | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They have rolled it back over the years. Theres a full files app now, USBs can be easily plugged in to the iPhone, every app that allows exporting allows saving to the files section, etc. | |
| ▲ | sussmannbaka 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Im not sure if Android has caught up but the iOS file explorer app is excellent. | | |
| ▲ | stavros 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Saying "I'm not sure if Android has caught up" when Android is decades ahead of Apple in that regard is some kind of... something. | | |
| ▲ | sussmannbaka 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Certainly wasn’t ahead with the stock file manager that came with my last Android phone. | | |
| ▲ | stavros 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What about after you spent the two seconds to install a different file manager? | | | |
| ▲ | esseph 23 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That also could have been from the phone manufacturer OR from the carrier. This is why I've avoided non Pixel phones since the Pixel5 came out. None of that 2 or 3 apps for the same thing so everybody can get their ad cut payout. | |
| ▲ | DANmode 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Your Samsung or whatever manufacturer bloated trash ≠ Android. | | |
| ▲ | sussmannbaka 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I used the AOSP app I think? I’d usually agree with you but in this case I really wanted some more bloat because that one was dire :) |
|
| |
| ▲ | BoredPositron 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Still no smb/webdav/sftp somehow... | | |
| |
| ▲ | esseph 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Was the list time you had an Android pre-2017? It was around that time it (Files app) got a major refresh. | |
| ▲ | bigyabai 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm pretty sure that iOS only has a file explorer app because Android supported it. There was almost a whole decade there where Apple pretended that the feature just didn't need to exist. | | |
| ▲ | kevin_thibedeau 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | To be fair, Android lacked a stock file browser for much of its existence. | | |
| ▲ | stavros 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | The difference is that iOS still doesn't show you the files on your device. It only shows you files in a small area. | | |
| ▲ | wkat4242 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | I love Android but Android does that too. Apps have their internal storage area which you can't access unfortunately (not without root anyway). Nor system files. | | |
| ▲ | TheGoddessInari 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There's a difference between "can't see 'special' folders" & "can't access anything but the app-specific storage". iOS loves the latter, while Android lets you organize files mostly normally even if doing highly stupid/discouraging things for power users & some app developers making questionable non-default choices. | | |
| ▲ | sussmannbaka 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | While I bet there’s some technicality I’ll get gotcha’d on, iOS apps do the exact same nowadays. | | |
| ▲ | bigyabai 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | iOS apps didn't, for the majority of the iPhone's lifespan. I explained this "technicality" upthread: > There was almost a whole decade there where Apple pretended that the feature just didn't need to exist. | | |
| ▲ | sussmannbaka 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | The history lesson is appreciated but how does this relate to the current state of the stock file explorer that ships with the OS? I’m using my phone now and not ten years ago. edit: oh, I think I get it. My original post wasn't intended to be read "iOS invented the file explorer, has Android also a file explorer app" (which would be silly, of course) but "when Files app released, the AOSP file explorer that commonly ships as the default was lacking, has this improved (caught up to Files app)" |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | stavros 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | When I had an iPhone (a few months ago), there was no way for apps to see files in the filesystem. I wanted to play some music and I had to copy it over to each of the music player apps separately. Is that not the case any more? | | |
| ▲ | badc0ffee 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | VLC for iOS uses the filesystem. You can add files with Finder (newer macOS), iTunes (older macOS), or the Files app on the phone. You are correct that each app can only see a specific part of the filesystem, unless the apps are by the same developer and part of an App Group. | |
| ▲ | sussmannbaka 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That’s entirely up to the app developer. Of course apps can see files if they’re developed to do that. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | sussmannbaka 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Am I supposed to be mad about them not supporting a feature during a time when I didn’t use iOS or is this somehow supposed to impact my current day use of Files app? | |
| ▲ | creaturemachine 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Remember folks, the iphone was released in 2007, and the files app in 2017.
Cut & paste? Apple didn't give ios a clipboard until 2021. | | |
| ▲ | joshstrange 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Apple didn't give ios a clipboard until 2021. Apple added copy/paste in iOS 3.0 in 2009 |
|
| |
| ▲ | rcMgD2BwE72F 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Try connecting to a WebDAV server on File. It's possible but it's shitty. And try using Syncthing on iOS to keep your files synced across devices without having them uploaded to servers you don't control. Also, on Android, you can choose any file explorer. You're stuck with Files and it sucks (but it looks nice). | | |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | The difference is that the Files app works with third party cloud storage providers. | |
| ▲ | sussmannbaka 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don’t have one of those! I do have an SMB share mounted that I’m currently playing music from, though, and it’s working perfectly fine. |
|
| |
| ▲ | recursive 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It goes farther than that. It dates back to at least iPod and iTunes library synchronizing. | |
| ▲ | nosrepa 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What's a computer? | |
| ▲ | crooked-v 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They did a pretty hard reverse on that. There's now a full Files app with integration with other apps (cloud storage, asset managers like Adobe, terminals for SSH transfers, etc). Unfortunately a lot of apps have never caught up and will only save stuff in the pre-Files sandboxes and not the shared local or cloud containers. | | | |
| ▲ | MangoToupe 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ios has an app called "Files". Now "bluetooth" I could buy (and I do not miss at all). |
|
|
| ▲ | 26 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | tormeh 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Looks like this is an Apple problem that can ve solved by not using Apple products. Every once in a while I look at some Apple device and think it's nifty. Shortly after I'm made aware of some thing or other that they can't do because Apple just doesn't like standards, open source, or just freedom itself. |
| |
| ▲ | excalibur 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's not enough to not use Apple products. You either have to convince everyone around you to not use them either, or you have to have compatability. | |
| ▲ | hhh 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Like what? | | |
| ▲ | bhelkey 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Lets just zoom into a single use case. The ability of the user to buy a 3rd Party watch that integrates with their phone: * Apple doesn't allow 3rd Party watches to send text messages. The Apple Watch is allowed to do so. * Apple doesn't allow 3rd Party to take actions on notifications. The Apple Watch is allowed to do so. * If you want to use the internet on your watch, you must: 1) install a 3rd party app, 2) keep that app open. Closing the app closes the connection to the internet. The Apple Watch does not have this restriction. * 3rd Party watches cannot detect if you are using your phone. This means that they will notify users of notifications even if the user is looking at the notification. The Apple Watch does not have this restriction. * Apple does not have ‘interprocess communication’(IPC) like Android. * Apple restricts making 3rd Party App Stores. This makes it difficult to make a community of people making watch faces. All points come from Pebble's blog [1]. This is just a single type of integration that Apple intentionally makes difficult, there are many others (e.g. 3rd Party Photos App, ...) [1] https://ericmigi.com/blog/apple-restricts-pebble-from-being-... | |
| ▲ | dnissley 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | On iPhones you can't install software except through the app store | | |
| ▲ | nkozyra 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well Android is going to be the same way now, too. | | |
| ▲ | miloignis 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | No, that's not true - the change was that you could only install software from verified developers, not only from the app store, and now they've partially walked that back too and "are building a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn't verified." ( https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2025/11/android-de... ) | |
| ▲ | stavros 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Nah, they rolles that back. | |
| ▲ | StopDisinfo910 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Certainly not. Google is only mandating signing. That’s already extremely bad but that’s still infinitely better than what Apple offers. |
|
| |
| ▲ | fainpul 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Like sharing your WLAN. It works great between iPhones, if you know how it works and the preconditions are fulfilled (it's undiscoverable). You can't share with Android devices by showing them a QR code – which I would consider the "usual" way and which is easy to do on Android devices. Edit: Here is the procedure I was talking about and all prerequisites for it to work: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102635 | | |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | iOS hotspots are discoverable by non-Apple devices if you have "Allow Others to Join" enabled and have the Personal Hotspot settings panel open on the iOS device. Otherwise, it's hidden to help prevent unintended connection attempts. | | |
| ▲ | rootusrootus 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | I suspect they mean sharing the password for a regular wifi network, not running a hotspot. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | That feature hardly works between iPhones anyway. It’s easier to just open the passwords app and show the QR code. |
|
| |
| ▲ | stavros 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It has never worked for me on iOS. Everyone kept saying "I can just share the password" but the prompt never popped up, and there was no way to do anything. | | |
| ▲ | rootusrootus 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | IIRC it only works if you are on their contact list. And I think you need to be in the settings app. Something like that. It's a handy feature but Apple could make it easier to understand, and they could do way better communicating why it isn't working, when it does not work. |
|
| |
| ▲ | bigyabai 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Bluetooth LDAC would be cool. | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | kevincox 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's really an embarrassment to our society that it took this long. And still only by seemingly by reverse engineering with no cooperation from Apple. |
|
| ▲ | Gys 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > We used to be able to send files over Bluetooth before the iPhone came out. Cross platforms, really? So for example between a Blackberry and a Windows CE phone? |
| |
| ▲ | _shantaram 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Cross platforms, really? So for example between a Blackberry and a Windows CE phone? Yes, it was part of the Bluetooth file transfer spec[0] and possible between any two devices that implemented it correctly. 0: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/file-transfer... | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It always kind of sucked though. You had to go through the pairing process, and then the transfer was incredibly slow since Bluetooth is very low bandwidth. It’s still a classic Apple “the open standard sucks so build a proprietary one that’s great but only on iPhone” | | |
| ▲ | dcreater 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It worked and it was good enough | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad 20 minutes ago | parent [-] | | At 1Mbit. It was good enough but it absolutely sucks today. Meanwhile AirDrop is hundreds of megabit to a gigabit. Trying to send a video file over Bluetooth would be miserable. |
|
| |
| ▲ | input_sh 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You could do it even before phones came with Bluetooth via Infrared. Granted, the two phones had to be placed perfectly for the IR sensors to connect, if you moved them the file transfer would break. Bluetooth was a huge upgrade because you no longer needed to do that. | |
| ▲ | magicalhippo 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I recall getting very surprised when my sister got one of the first Windows phones (one with the tile menu) and it didn’t support this feature. |
| |
| ▲ | rescbr 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | When I was in high school we chatted exchanging notes/txt files between Nokias, LGs, Samsungs and Sony Ericsson feature phones and Windows Mobile (I had an HP one) and Symbian (two friends who had a N95) smartphones. This was just as broadband was getting popular, so those who had it usually downloaded MP3s and then distributed them at school through Bluetooth. I remember one friend using her phone as a bridge to copy files from me using Bluetooth and sending to another friend's phone using IR. This was across all the classroom, this definitely wasn't restricted to the nerdy clique. We found out that chatting through notes exchange worked pretty well and then it spread like wildfire. SMSes were expensive in my country! This was like 20 years ago. Maybe 2006-2007. Twenty years later we're commemorating that Bluetooth File Exchange over WiFi is now interoperable between the only two major mobile OS as if it were a revolutionary technology. How backwards it is. | |
| ▲ | adrianmonk 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes. When my mom got her first Android phone, she wanted to transfer all her photos from her Motorola Razr flip phone. She said the guy at the AT&T store had a device that would plug in to the data ports of various phones and transfer stuff between them, but it wouldn't do it, so he declared it impossible. My mom was upset that she would lose her photos, so I puzzled over it for a long time trying to figure out a way. Finally, I realized I was being stupid and missing the obvious: both phones had Bluetooth! I paired them with each other, dug through Razr menus, selected the photos, and did a Bluetooth file send. As expected, the photos went right over. Well, I shouldn't say right over because it was very slow, but it worked just as it should. | |
| ▲ | marcodiego 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Most of what are called "dumbphones" allowed easy file sharing over bluetooth. Even the cheapest ones. | |
| ▲ | randunel 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes, even "dumb" phones could share files with computers back then. Apple users have no idea how much harm their masters have done to society. | | |
| ▲ | trelane 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | And you could tether, though it was complicated. And slow (1xRTT) |
| |
| ▲ | kccqzy 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not just phones, the Mac as well. So it’s not like Apple doesn’t know about this feature of Bluetooth. They just chose not to do it on the iPhone. | |
| ▲ | msh 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don’t know about blackberry, but it worked fine between feature phone Nokias and windows pdas / phones (before windows phone 7). | |
| ▲ | kcb 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yea, there's a Bluetooth protocol for it called OBEX. | |
| ▲ | 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | rckt 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| And even via IR port. |
|
| ▲ | kotaKat 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I miss being able to plug my phone (of any kind) in and getting it mounted as a drive letter. Android misses the mark so much with MTP and iPhone… waves frantically at iTunes. (At least, in a weird bizarre twist, the iPhone’s Files app is actually really useful for me. I find myself formatting flash drives, copying stuff from network shares, etc, all from my phone and it’s so nifty to have nearly-first-class features there.) |
| |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | MTP is really, really bad. I have a better experience managing files on iOS devices using Linux than I do managing files on Android devices using macOS simply because available MTP implementations are so awful. I know that read/write conflict concerns are what got USB Mass Storage mode removed from Android, but surely there's some way to resolve that. Like it wouldn't bother me a bit if Android just locked the device and put it in "file transfer mode" when it's mounted on a computer, similar to how iPods used to and how Kobo e-readers do now. It'd be worth the universal robust multi-platform support. | | |
| ▲ | Dylan16807 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Or they could have figured out a new version of MTP that supports basic features like concurrent access and normal metadata. Or they could have gone for SMB/NFS over a virtual network link. Anything but this horrible interface they've doubled down on. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | pavo-etc 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You can still send files over bluetooth on devices that aren't iPhones. Even Macs support this |
|
| ▲ | 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |