| ▲ | cardanome 14 hours ago |
| As a Linux user I feel you. The Mac Desktop is vastly inferior to the Linux world (for power users) but the hardware is so, so good. For me it is about having a completely silent setup. It is so, so hard to go back to noisy fans. I really hope Asahi Linux keep going so I can have the best of both worlds. |
|
| ▲ | didacusc 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Saying that the macOS desktop is vastly inferior to Linux desktops is absolutely nuts. I've tried to get my relatives on Linux desktops so many times, just for it to go completely wrong a couple of weeks after and having to reinstall Windows. It's just not made for average (or below-average) users, so I don't see how it can be VASTLY inferior to something as easy and polished as macOS. |
| |
| ▲ | baq 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I don’t need polished and superior, I need to get work done. I want the OS to get out of the way, not slow me down with animations, stage managers and pretty docks. I don’t even need customization, I just need it to stop trying to outdo itself and fall over. I’d run kde or even gnome on my work MacBook if it let me without a second thought. PS just installed ios 26 and what is this? If this low contrast blobby window thing makes its way to the laptop I’ll be very, very not impressed. | | |
| ▲ | mrheosuper 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | if you are power user, why bother with GUI at all ? | |
| ▲ | zer00eyz 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > If this low contrast blobby window thing makes its way to the laptop I’ll be very, very not impressed. You have quite a bit of control over all of these features. Dark mode, contrast controls... There is a lot there you can tweak to have it look how you want and it stays that way through pretty much all upgrades. > animations, stage managers and pretty docks. You can turn all this off for the most part. Spend as much time and effort customizing your Mac as you do customizing your Linux desktop and a lot of your laments will go away. I use both often enough to know that linux on the desktop is a much steeper investment if you want it to work for you. | | |
| ▲ | echelon 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Finder can't be replaced. Finder the least flexible file explorer of any OS. There's no location bar. You can't have a dynamically resizing grid of icons, so if you resize your windows, the icons are constantly outside of the horizontal scroll blinds. The view modalities make it difficult to sort and find files. Major system paths (eg. Applications) are locked down and hidden. The window manager can't be replaced. Window manager placement hacks exist, but they are not first class. You'll never have first class tiling windows in Mac. Many of the window manager quirks are forced upon you. You can't change how to cycle and alternate windows. Exposé is flakey... | | |
| ▲ | leakycap 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > There's no location bar. Option 1: View > Show Location Bar (you can right-click or double-click on any folder to interact)
Option 2: Option-click the folder name in the Finder Window's title bar to immediately jump to other folders
Option 3: If you want to type a location and go there, press Command-Shift-G for Go > Go to Location > You can't have a dynamically resizing grid of icons, so if you resize your windows, the icons are constantly outside of the horizontal scroll blinds. Of course you can. Select View > Clean Up By > and choose the option you like best. > The view modalities make it difficult to sort and find files. Name a built-in file explorer with semi-spatial (Sidebar off), browser icon mode, hierarchical list mode, gallery, and column view. Bonus points if they have anything remotely like QuickLook. > The view modalities make it difficult to sort and find files. What is difficult about Command-1, Command-2, Command-3, Command-4 to switch views? What is hard about Command-J for granular settings? > Major system paths (eg. Applications) are locked down and hidden. Applications is visible at the system-wide and user level. Applications folder is listed in the "Go" menu, present in every Finder menubar. Applications is, by default, on the left sidebar of every Finder window. If you want to type, Command-Space brings up any Application at a whim. Can't find an Application or want to see EVERY app on the system and connected drives? Hold Option while going to Apple > System Information and click the "Applications" listing on the left sidebar. > Window manager placement hacks exist, but they are not first class. Moom wants a chat. BetterTouchTool wonders if you've heard of it. Heck, DockDoor is free and excellent, too! They're only second-class in the sense they won't bring down your system when they act up. > You can't change how to cycle and alternate windows. Exposé is flakey... This is either a configuration error or not being familiar with how to use it. Exposé works better than any similar system on any other platform I've tried - what do you think is a better example of a systemwide Exposé alternative on another platform? Wait, I don't need one because Mission Control & Exposé are bulletproof. | |
| ▲ | zer00eyz 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Finder the least flexible file explorer of any OS. Tell me how you getting around your system on linux? Search is and remains a first class citizen on Mac, and is for the most part on Linux. Spotlight still edges out linux choices. Windows has all the "power tools" to root through folders cause its search is such hot garbage. > You'll never have first class tiling windows in Mac. No you have ones that work. Because the moment that you plug in mismatched or non standard monitors into a modern linux distro all bets are off. To make that work your going to end up with some pretty intense setup where your forced into window management rather than a traditional desktop. Can you do it... You sure can... But I run an out of the box IDE on a basic Mac with a few tweaks for a reason: because playing games with my tools isnt getting work done. I have an arch, ubuntu and windows desktop and I have a Mac laptop. Is the linux box fun. It sure is. Does running it involve doing a lot of chores, you bet it does. | | |
| ▲ | heavyset_go 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Because the moment that you plug in mismatched or non standard monitors into a modern linux distro all bets are off. I do this daily with different displays and have no problems whatsoever. I've probably used over 30 different displays over USB-C and HDMI on Linux and have had no problems. They were all different sizes, DPIs, panel types, brands, etc. Meanwhile, I can't even do fractional scaling when using macOS lol | |
| ▲ | imiric 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I run an out of the box IDE on a basic Mac with a few tweaks for a reason: because playing games with my tools isnt getting work done. I hear this sentiment often, but I think it's missing the main reason why most people prefer Linux, whether that's for work or leisure. What you call "playing games" to me is actually configuring our tools and environment to function optimally according to our needs and preferences. Yes, we spend an inordinate amount of time doing this, but it ultimately leads to a more comfortable and enjoyable experience, which is well worth it considering we spend most of our day using our machines. This is not unlike a carpenter who has very specific preferences about their tools, and how they might spend a lot of time organizing and honing them. Sure they can use a pre-built workbench from IKEA, but chances are that they prefer using one they've customized or partly built themselves over the years. Dealing with jank and the occasional frustration is unavoidable in Linux, but no operating system and machine are perfect. There are always trade-offs. We just prefer the freedom and flexibility over a corporation forcing us to use our computers the way they think we should. We all have different priorities and preferences, and I'm not saying yours are in any way inferior, but I wanted to clarify the other perspective. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | trueismywork 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I just got a work Mac and I have spent around 20 years now on linux before it. I was making a list compared to KDE (not pros/cons just differences) It is still a work in progress since its only a couple of days since im using it. 1. No delete button. I know you can do Fn delete but It is more problematic. And I do use delete often. 2. System keeps important system stuff in Library directory in home. Do not do remove any directories. 4. Os x doesnt quit apps and then expects me to go through all apps in windows switcher. 5. The spaces dont wrap around. 6. Finder is always in your alt +tab? Causes issues with switching. 7. Corners are round. How to Disable it control the roundedness 8. Alt +Tab doesnt automatically restore minimized windows. 9. App store is quite weak compared to archlinux 10. There is no spaces pager (a small bar at top where I can immediately see which desktop im in) 11. It seems that I cannot have windows of same app in multiple spaces. 12. Same app has only one window. Apple mail for example. Cannot copy text from email to settings. 13. How to Disable HTML display in apple mail. 14. Kmail has much better interface for signing Both for viewing rhe signed emails and for deciding which key to use 15. Opening a new windows from spotlight is not possible 16. Download multiple wallpapers at same time is not possible 17. All operations related to an app should be inside an app. Alt+w for tab and ctrl+tab for switching makes me move two fingers instead of one. 18. Spectacle is so much better than screen shot on MAC os 19. Ramdisk on mac os x 21. Threads view in emails isnot possible in apple mail 22. Application specific power optimization (for good battery life) on OS X 23. Better security and access on OSX for apps. 23. Switching between apps of same windows on OSX does not bring up a visual aid.. 24. Long press leads to accents which is very cool but also I didn't use it. | | |
| ▲ | bityard 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | 25. Left-clicking in a window to raise it _sometimes_ performs actions in the app (e.g. clicking a button or scrolling the window) and _sometimes_ only raises the window. It seems to depend on the app. 26. No ability to use focus-follows-mouse. 27. Home/End keys send you to the top/bottom of the whole document instead of the start/end of a line. The latter is much more useful to me and I use it all the time. You can change this behavior with a terminal command followed by rebooting, but some programs still do whatever they want. 28. Automatic text replacements change the text you entered into the text that Apple thinks you mean. (Can also be disabled.) 29. Holding down an alphanumeric key brings up an accept/symbol selector, as on iPhone. This isn't compatible with many terminal applications like vim. 30. The dock has a tendency to move automatically to another display when there is a maximized window on that display. (I know how to move the dock by going bottom of the display and moving the mouse down, this isn't that.) 31. The camera notch can hide icons and you have no way to get to them without either connecting and external display or a workaround like https://github.com/dwarvesf/hidden. | |
| ▲ | Nevermark 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > The spaces dont wrap around. Indeed. I would love it if I could name spaces too. Amazing how little details improve productivity. > It seems that I cannot have windows of same app in multiple spaces. Right-click app icon in dock. For different app windows in the same app, appearing in different spaces: Options->Assign to Desktop->None. For app windows appearing across all spaces: Options->Assign to Desktop->All Desktops. ("Desktop" here actually refers to spaces, for some reason. And it would be nice to be able to do "All Desktops" at the window level, but nay.) | | | |
| ▲ | sonofhans 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I feel your pain here; I remember my transition from Debian to MacOS. I’ve used DOS, Windows, Linux, and MacOS — each full-time for more than a decade. The switching pain is real, and some things still feel wrong to me after I got to love them on a prior OS. E.g., in Windows apps, menu items are keyboard-addressable by default. This is brilliant for accessibility, and for accustomed power users. MacOS has no _by default_ equivalent. E.g., managing virtual desktops in Linux are exactly as flexible and powerful as you want them to be. MacOS does it One Way (more or less), and you’d better like it. I still love MacOS the most. Some of the things you list are real misses (#1). Some of them, I believe, are things you haven’t found yet (#11, #15, #16). Some are MacOS-specific metaphors which I’ve come to love compared with the alternatives (#4). Some I don’t understand but would be happy to discuss with you (#17). | | |
| ▲ | matthew-wegner an hour ago | parent [-] | | > E.g., in Windows apps, menu items are keyboard-addressable by default. This is brilliant for accessibility, and for accustomed power users. MacOS has no _by default_ equivalent. Cmd-Shift-? (really, Cmd-?) You can begin using arrow keys from there, or start typing to search the menu items of the foreground app You can also assign arbitrary hotkeys to any application's menu items in the OS system preferences |
| |
| ▲ | cesarvarela 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | 4 - in macOS apps != windows (some apps don't respect this) 8 - minimize in macOS is more like "get this window out of the way without closing it", and it is related to 4) 15 - because of 4 23 - wat Personally, once I got used to cmd+tab and cmd+` for window management, I can't go back, but it needs a different mental model than the one on Windows/Linux. | |
| ▲ | astrange 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > 19. Ramdisk on mac os x It has ramdisks (`diskimagetool attach ram://`) and tmpfs. | |
| ▲ | jakeydus 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | To be fair a lot of these might be because OS X was unveiled in 2016 /s |
| |
| ▲ | AuthAuth 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | MacOS is just missing way to many core features. It feels more like a demo than actual software to be used day to day for a variety of computing work. I know the technical under the hood are all solid but the software the user interacts with is bad, all the default apps are barebones with bad defaults and no settings to fix it. My final point is: finder. When I put non techy people on mac they end up having a good experience because they learn quickly there is no reason to touch anything except the web browser. I also want to highlight Macs are high end hardware in a premium package compared to Linux where people usually try it on a really old low/mid range device. | |
| ▲ | heavyset_go 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What are your relatives doing? If they're like 95% of computer users, they use them to check their email, their FB/IG/etc and browse the web. A Chromebook would suit their needs, but in my experience, so would a modern Linux installation + a browser. The biggest friction in my experience is UI differences, but that is solved by just mimicking Windows/macOS UI in KDE. Put buttons and components where they expect to find them and it seems to just work, in my experience. | | |
| ▲ | hbn 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can also just tell them to get an M2 MacBook Air for $800. You'll have to do near zero troubleshooting, it'll last them the better part of a decade, they get unmatched battery life and hardware reliability, and if they do run into issues they'll have top-of-its-class support from Apple. I know Linux guys don't mind putting up with the Linux experience but if your family is trusting you as "the techie," you'd be doing them a huge favor by not making them put up with that stuff. | | |
| ▲ | heavyset_go 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > You can also just tell them to get an M2 MacBook Air for $800 Yes, you will find that most material problems can be solved by buying more stuff. If they wanted to buy a new laptop, they would have done that. > You'll have to do near zero troubleshooting That's the case now. Meanwhile, with the Macs they use, I have to explain that there's a difference between Intel and ARM Macs, that no, their software won't work in MACOS_VERSION because Apple deprecated some API, and no, you can't upgrade to MACOS_VERSION+1 to use something that works, no the hardware they've been using for years won't work because the driver for it is no longer compatible with their Mac/macOS version, the simple thing they want to do actually requires $30 paid software to do, I can't help you when Apple sold you a small hard drive at a premium and macOS takes up half of it, etc. > I know Linux guys don't mind putting up with the Linux experience but if your family is trusting you as "the techie," you'd be doing them a huge favor by not making them put up with that stuff Yeah, having a fast computer that just works must be tough lol |
|
| |
| ▲ | mistercheph 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah, and my fisher price car is a lot easier for my 3 year old to drive than my car. Sometimes powerful tools need sophisticated users that have time to invest in learning to use the tool. "Inferior" might depend on who is trying to accomplish what, but it's hard to argue that if you're trying to do or build the most sophisticated and cutting edge things that computers are capable of doing, you probably don't want to be using macOS or window. That doesn't mean that it doesn't work marvelously when you have 0 time to invest in learning to use your computer, and all you want is to access web applications and manage a few files on a screen bigger than your smartphone and with a physical keyboard. | |
| ▲ | cardanome 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | jebarker 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I do all my software development in remote clusters/supercomputers. I’d consider myself a power user. My laptop is for running a terminal, vscode, a browser and the various applications my company requires, e.g. Teams, Slack. So I want reliability, low configuration and maintenance overhead on my part and good battery life. Linux can’t compete on these fronts. | | |
| ▲ | cardanome 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | All those pros you list have nothing to do with the desktop environment. Maybe low configuration but you can have that on Linux too. I totally agree that the hardware and the underlying Unix is decent. Audio on Mac is also way less of a hassle. I am not saying that a power user wouldn't have good reason to chose a Mac, just that the desktop is for me the weakest part of it compared to Linux. | |
| ▲ | trueismywork 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I do the same and I prefer KDE much more than Mac OS X apart from battery part. |
| |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It’s more subjective of a thing than many would like to admit. As someone who’s been working as a dev for a decade and writing code outside of work for twice that, one of the things keeping me away from Linux is that there simply isn’t a true Mac analogue DE. | | |
| ▲ | throwaway240403 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's funny how polarizing this is. Seemingly based on whatever system you grew up on, or are most accustomed to. I find Mac's window management to be something of a joke, and can't imagine why anyone would want to replicate it. I do see the value of the global menu but everything else feels wholly unintuitive to me.
I can't stand that cmd+tab takes you to the last app, not the last window, and raises all that apps other windows as well. I literally never want that. | | |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | The way Mac window management works, ironically, is that you manage windows as little as possible. You don't even go as far as to maximize or tile most of them. Instead, windows are sized to fit their content and sit where they may, overlapping each other and allowing the most relevant portions of each to peek through, like the digital analogue of a desk with a pile of odd-sized papers. Windows are foregrounded by either clicking a bit that's peeking out or triggering Exposé and choosing a thumbnail. It's a very different mindset than that of a Windows-like desktop or tiling window manager. |
|
| |
| ▲ | wqaatwt 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sometimes jumping through random hops to solve things just work on other operating systems is fun (not sarcasm). | |
| ▲ | GuinansEyebrows 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | hey, i don't know if you've considered it, but this comes across as a pretty unnecessarily-insulting way to state a personal preference. | |
| ▲ | 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | jsheard 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Desktop Macs do have fans so they're not completely silent, but if you were under the impression there aren't any then that reflects well on how good their tuning is. AFAIK the MacBook Air is the only passively cooled Mac. |
| |
| ▲ | cardanome 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | I know that they have fans but I really can't hear them. Maaaybe when gaming but I would to have to really concentrate on that. And I am super sensitive to noise. It is so sad that apparently no one else bothers to tune their fans properly. It is such a killer feature for me. | | |
| ▲ | WorldPeas 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | for real. the only brand that comes close are the chromeboxes, or passive industrial computers, though the speed there isn't flawless, or close to it. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Aurornis 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > The Mac Desktop is vastly inferior to the Linux world I have to use Mac, Linux, and Windows desktops in my work. They all have their pros and cons, but I can’t say I’d ever argue that the Mac desktop experience is vastly inferior to the Linux desktop experience. Edit: Getting a lot of downvotes but most of the comments are about someone’s highly customized Linux desktop compared to completely vanilla Mac desktop. I’m referring to apples to apples comparison where they’re either some standard out of the box version or when customized with available tools and mods. Comparing your highly customized Linux desktop to a completely uncustomized Mac setup with no attempt at other tools or utilities isn’t an interesting comparison because it’s not apples to apples, it’s just a statement about your current preference. |
| |
| ▲ | dmm 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | On a Mac, you can switch between apps with Command-Tab or windows of the same app with Command-` but there's no way to cycle between all windows or bounce between to two most recently used windows. Maybe this used to make sense when apps were single purpose but I do basically everything in a web browser or a terminal so not being able to bounce between the previously selected window(of whatever kind), as I can with Alt-Tab on linux or windows, is frustrating. Also Command-` switches to the next window, not the previous one like I would expect. MacOS removed subpixel antialiasing, honestly for understandable reasons, making rendering on low-ppi displays blurry, but high-ppi displays are still super expensive. I got a 32" 4k monitor(~140ppi) at Costco for $250. A >200ppi display of the same size costs 20x that amount. | | |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | For web apps, spinning them into “installed” apps (doable in both Chrome and Safari now) is the move. This unclogs your tab bar, gets rid of the pointless persistent browser chrome, and gives you the benefit of OS task management capabilities. You can add Shift to both Command-Tab and Command-` to move in the reverse direction. | | |
| ▲ | nehal3m 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Also I find the default Command-` to be unintuitive, especially on non-US keyboards (` is next to left Shift for me). I remapped Command-` to Option-Tab so you only have to move your thumb. | |
| ▲ | boredtofears 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Woah, I did not know about this installable web app feature - this is a game changer. Thanks for sharing. |
| |
| ▲ | baq 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Betterdisplay is $20 or so and solves the ppi problem for the most part. It’s the dumbest thing apple has ever done and hats off to betterdisplay dev. Best money ever spent on a desktop tool easily. | | |
| ▲ | skydhash 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The solution is subpar, even if it's nice to have one. What windows and linux have is hinting for text and good antialiasing on vector elements. They map these those the actual hardware pixels so you won't have wobbly lines. These don't matter as much when you have high PPI. But they're a lifeline on low PPI displays (and there are a lot of those). |
| |
| ▲ | buffington 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Most macOS keyboard commands that let you cycle between things (like windows or applications) can be "reversed" by adding the SHIFT key. So CMD+TAB+SHIFT cycles in the opposite order of from CMD+TAB, etc. | |
| ▲ | acc348 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | 32" 6K monitor from ASUS costs $1400, 27" 5K Dahua monitor is $500, it's not $250, but we are slowly getting there ... | | | |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I do basically everything in a web browser Then you are deliberately handicapping yourself, this isn't something you can blame on the OS. It's like complaining that a car has bad fuel economy because you always stay in first gear. As for the displays, you are comparing apples to oranges. You can get a high DPI monitor which is smaller than 32 inches for cheap. Which is plenty of screen for the distances where DPI differences are important. | | |
| ▲ | atahanacar 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | >Then you are deliberately handicapping yourself, this isn't something you can blame on the OS. The classic "You're holding it wrong" defense. Especially when the alternatives don't have this problem. | | |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you think that the purpose of OS X or Apple devices is to live in the web browser or live in the terminal, then you've been very misinformed. It's on the level of buying a motorcycle and expecting it to have a roof. And then complaining about the manufacturer. Apple stuff has worked like this for decades. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | coldpie 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Man just give me a way to switch between only the two most recent windows using a keyboard shortcut (without requiring some janky 3rd party program). Windows-style alt-tab. It's not a big ask and would make the macOS experience go from "barely usable" to "perfectly fine." | | |
| ▲ | WillAdams 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Does Command tab not do this? It brings up a list of applications in most recently to least recently used order, so two apps switched to/from will constantly switch places. | | |
| ▲ | zhivota 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not if the windows are both from the same program. Then it's a different keybind, CMD-~ which doesn't have the same priority order style as CMD-Tab. I get caught up on this constantly, to the point where I decided to stop using one Chrome window under my work profile, and one under my personal profile, just so I can have my personal browser under a different program so CMD-Tab works better. |
| |
| ▲ | cschep 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | cmd-tab does this. what are we missing? cmd-tab, cmd-tab. terminal, browser. browser, terminal. has for years. |
| |
| ▲ | cardanome 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Are you a gnome user? Linux Mint with Cinnamon is bliss. Or well anything else, you are absolutely spoiled for choice with Desktop Environments in Linux. There is the perfect one for everyone. At least if you use X11, wayland is still a turd. I found the Mac Desktop absolutely unusable for any development work as it comes out of the box. You need a metric ton of third-party extensions for simple stuff like proper alt-tab support or custom shortcuts. An configuration is supper limited. And it will get so much worse with the whole glasses ui thing. | | |
| ▲ | Aurornis 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Linux Mint with Cinnamon is bliss. This is one of my go-tos when I need a VM, so I’m familiar. > I found the Mac Desktop absolutely unusable for any development work as it comes out of the box. But why are we comparing vanilla macOS to an extreme customized Linux setup as if they’re the same thing? Why one set of rules for one platform but those criteria are suspended for Linux, where we get to assume some specific set of perfectly configured everything? This is the hyperbole that I can’t really take seriously. Calling it “absolutely unusable” just isn’t something I can take seriously. I understand that some people like to customize their environments to the Nth degree and can’t live without their personal set of customizations, but that’s personal preferences. Calling other platforms “absolutely unusable” or “vastly inferior” is just an exaggeration when millions of devs use them just fine. | | |
| ▲ | lynndotpy 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > But why are we comparing vanilla macOS to an extreme customized Linux setup as if they’re the same thing? Your assumption that these Linux setups are "extremely customized" is wrong. Personally, I hate configuring or customizing much at all. The appeal of Linux is that there are distros that come configured out-of-the-box pretty much as I like it, whereas MacOS and especially Windows requires configuration and constant upkeep and maintenance. (MacOS doesn't even come with a decent terminal, for starters.) For me, my main problem with MacOS is that it's full of looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong animations that you can not disable or remove. Disabling animations (or setting them to be <10ms long) is one of the few configurations I like to do. But this is not even an option on Apple's operating systems. It's like running through molasses in a dream-- it's so damnedly and artificially slow. | | |
| ▲ | torstenvl 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | What makes you say it isn't an option? defaults write com.apple.finder DisableAllAnimations -bool true | | |
| ▲ | lynndotpy 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Because there is no option to disable all animations. Despite the name, that doesn't disable all animations. (In fact, I couldn't even find an animation that does remove.) | | |
| ▲ | torstenvl 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | You said "Disabling animations . . . is not even an option on Apple's operating systems." That is quite simply false. | | |
| ▲ | lynndotpy an hour ago | parent [-] | | One can not disable the animations on MacOS. I would very much like to be wrong. Please tell me I am wrong and how to disable animations, especially when swapping between desktops. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | cardanome 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > But why are we comparing vanilla macOS to an extreme customized Linux setup as if they’re the same thing? Why one set of rules for one platform but those criteria are suspended for Linux, where we get to assume some specific set of perfectly configured everything? My Linux Mint installation is actually barely customized. It absolutely works out of the box. I disabled a few animations and selected a different theme and added like three extra shortcuts but that is it. Nothing that would take more than ten minutes. I was comparing the vanilla experience. And yes, I should have specified that I am talking about my needs. I totally believe that the Mac Desktop might be better for the average user but that is no me. |
| |
| ▲ | Klonoar 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Other OS’s handling of “alt-tab” does not make it de facto “proper”. You are trying to use macOS like your other favorite OS(s). This is not how macOS has ever worked, and the macOS approach is more than fine for millions of people. | | |
| ▲ | cardanome 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | I doesn't matter if it is fine for millions of people if it isn't fine for me. | | |
| ▲ | Klonoar 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | None of that matters when it was your poor description being corrected. |
|
| |
| ▲ | dsego 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > You are absolutely spoiled for choice with Desktop Environments in Linux. That is both a pro and a con. For someone offering tech support or writing documentation it's a pretty big negative. | |
| ▲ | jebarker 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > as it comes out of the box This doesn’t seem like a fair way to evaluate MacOS given the effort involved in configuring a Linux installation |
| |
| ▲ | yauneyz 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Depends how you configure it. If you like things like tiling window managers and keyboard driven computing, Linux is in a category of its own. | | |
| ▲ | presbyterian 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | There are a dozen or more options for tiling systems and keyboard-driven computing on macOS. Personally, one of the reasons I use macOS over Linux is because I find it easier to create custom keyboard commands and shortcuts. It’s all doable on Linux, sure, but on macOS there are several apps that make it easy. | | |
| ▲ | aeroevan 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you haven't used something like i3/sway/awesomewm/hyprland on the linux side you won't know what you're missing. While there are several apps to create custom keyboard commands, only yabai+skhd come close to what's available on linux, and it's not even that close tbh. |
|
| |
| ▲ | AceJohnny2 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I’m referring to apples to apples comparison where they’re either some standard out of the box version or when customized with available tools and mods. Comparing your highly customized Linux desktop to a completely uncustomized Mac setup with no attempt at other tools or utilities isn’t an interesting comparison because it’s not apples to apples, it’s just a statement about your current preference. Perhaps you missed the parent's "(for power users)"? So here's an apples-to-apples comparison: customizing Mac desktop for one's preferences compared to Linux. I've been on Mac for 10 years because of Work. Before that I was on Linux, using the AwesomeWM tiling window manager. I dearly miss AwesomeWM. I've tried most 3rd-party window managers for Mac, and nothing comes close to the snappiness and functionality of Linux's tiling managers like AwesomeWM. Nowadays I just use window-movers like Rectangle [1], and I feel handicapped. The simple fact of the matter is that Mac does not allow the level of customization that Linux inherently does. MacOS' UI hooks are through the Accessibility framework, and in my user experience, it's just a slower, jankier emulation of what a more deeply integrated WM can do. As a specific example, the author of DisplayMaid [2] has complained elsewhere on HN that macOS does not provide reliable identifiers for the displays, so they had to implement their own heuristics. Side-note: for a system so inherently dockable as macbooks, it's a tragedy that I have to rely on a 3rd-party app to re-position my windows for one of my 2 regular work setups. I'm sure Apple could implement the hooks for better WM customization, they've certainly done their few updates with Spaces and their own poor-man's tiling, but the years with no update to integration demonstrate that they consider the Accessibility hooks to be Good Enough. [1] https://rectangleapp.com [2] https://funk-isoft.com/display-maid.html | | |
| ▲ | aeroevan 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | yabai is as close as I've seen, but yeah nothing close to awesomewm or even something like sawywm |
| |
| ▲ | dheera 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The point is that Linux allows you to customize it to your liking, almost infinitely. There is almost nothing you cannot do. People are comparing them to vanilla Mac setups because Macs don't really let you have a non-vanilla experience. |
|
|
| ▲ | mschaef 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > The Mac Desktop is vastly inferior to the Linux world Asking out of curiosity, why is this? What's the functionality you miss on Mac? |
| |
| ▲ | cardanome 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Most of it is there but you need a crap-load of third party extension and some even cost money. Like proper alt-tab, better keyboard configuration, Finder is the worst file manager I have ever used, a classical task bar and so on. You can manage but the defaults are really bad for power users. Honestly Apple just needs to let me install a proper Desktop Environment like KDE on it. The unix base is decent, just give me more freedom. | | |
| ▲ | wqaatwt 13 hours ago | parent [-] | | To be fair KDE is also pretty wonky out of the box (basic stuff like turning numlock on boot is unnecessarily buggy or confusing). you usually also need a bunch of extensions. And 50% of them are broken due to various if you try to use KDE builtin extension thing. |
| |
| ▲ | pm215 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The one I have always missed is proper focus-follows-mouse support. The mac desktop always feels really clunky without that when working with multiple windows. | |
| ▲ | lynndotpy 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Personally, most of my problems with MacOS (and Apple's operating systems) would be fixed if it were faster. The OS is full of very lengthy animations that aren't necessary, such as when switching between desktops. | | |
| ▲ | esalman 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | Looks like on Windows it possible to disable all animations, including switch desktop, but you have to press two buttons to switch. |
|
|