Remix.run Logo
▲ filipdobro 2 days ago

This seems like a coordinated hit, slowly releasing more and more information. What's really going on?

▲nashashmi 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

One affair always brings up other affairs out of the closet. Same rule goes for harassment and abuse claims.

That’s what is going on.

▲bunderbunder 21 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It’s not just misconduct claims. It’s the same reason why house parties have a tendency to go a bit too late and then suddenly empty out as soon as one person leaves. Or why at conferences you might wait an uncomfortable amount of time for someone to ask the first question, but after that there’s a queue.

In a nutshell, nobody wants to be the first.

(possibly obligatory disclaimer: I’m not saying this to minimize harassment and abuse claims. More the opposite: I worry that perceiving this phenomenon as something specific to harassment and abuse allegations can become a pretense for dismissing them out of hand.)

▲consp 17 hours ago | parent [-]

I assume the inverse is the same idea: most people don't want to take the last bite from a plate of snacks? Usually after it winds down for a while you get another wave of claims.

▲01100011 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yep. Maybe the other parties thought they had a special thing with him and now realize they're just another body? That makes people vindictive and willing to talk.

His security detail is also no longer worried about retribution and are likely complying with an internal investigation.

It's very likely his affairs were simply open secrets within the C suite.

▲raducu 18 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> It's very likely his affairs were simply open secrets within the C suite.

There's a lot of people who usually know.

People with power think their farts don't smell or that the rest are stupid and don't notice or some don't care that people know as long as they keep their moths shut, or they get careless over time -- but lots of people eventually know.

Early in my career I shared an office with the mistress of a General Manager, she was on good terms with everybody in the office (kind of odd she was placed in the same office with nerdy devs she had zero work contact with) -- but everybody else hated her guts, can't really rember their grievances. Anyway I used to catch glimpses of phisical contact between them and the guy divorced and they married.

Relationships with colleagues were encouraged with some limitations, perhaps that's why they were so non-chalant about it (though the guy being married back home was kind of gross even for our european open minds).

▲Merrill 17 hours ago | parent [-]

In the '70s a new manager transferred in. Some of the old hands pointed out that his wife was his second wife and former secretary. Back then, people talked, but there was no outrage.

▲guax a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Not even. Credibility is one thing. If people wanted to out him but were afraid, the time to be believed is now. The other is just that everyone is looking now and with all this attention more things come out.

▲DrScientist a day ago | parent | next [-]

The affairs he had ( revealed so far at least ) weren't with junior people - they were also exec's so I don't think there is any suggestion of abuse of power here.

It's much more likely that some people knew and journalists went around asking people.

It's surprising how far tittle-tattle can travel.

▲wongarsu a day ago | parent | next [-]

Powell didn't join Nvidia as exec though. She originally joined Nvidia in a business development role, before being promoted to her current role in 2017

That's long enough ago that it seems likely that Huang got to know her in her current role. But if the affair started earlier than 2017, there is the suggestion of abuse of power. Not with Powell as victim, but everyone else who hoped to get that role instead of her

▲DrScientist a day ago | parent [-]

Anything is possible. But in these scenarios I think it's wise to apply the following 2 principles.

1. Stick to the facts - speculation helps no-one.

2. Don't assume to fight on behalf of people you don't know.

For example there appears to be an assumption that his wife has been deeply wronged and she is the victim. This may well be the case. but it also might not be. That part of this story is a private matter for them and not helped by speculation and assumptions.

In fact I'd go further - you have in effect just accused Powell of being promoted by sleeping with the boss based entirely on speculation. Not sure that's helpful either.

▲jimmydddd 19 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Regarding his wife, I agree. He and his wife are both smart capable people. They may have worked our certain relationship parameters that they are both fine with.

▲neutronicus 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Shielding Powell from that implication is _why Huang has an obligation not to sleep with her._

Whether or not it’s the case, if the behavior is known to others in the company it also creates a hostile work environment for ambitious female employees who are not at Powell’s level but hope to reach it.

▲wongarsu a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I largely agree. At this stage we don't known enough to tell who is a victim here. We likely will never know for sure, nor do we have a right to demand to know

My speculation is purely for its explaining or predictive power on the question why all of this is coming out at once, and who's behind revealing all this. I favor the "conspiracy" version (someone wants him gone and exposes his real secrets in the most damaging way). But if we consider that this might all be organically triggered by the revelation of the spy affair we can't discount that the numerically largest group that feels wronged by his affairs might be employees that were disadvantaged whenever affair partners got special treatment

▲neutronicus 20 hours ago | parent [-]

The affair partners don’t even have to actually get special treatment. The perception that it happened is enough.

▲K0balt 6 minutes ago | parent [-]

Underlying this is that workplaces are supposed to be egalitarian, free of favouritism, and strict meritocracies?

On what planet is this a reasonable expectation rather than a fever dream of idealistic naivety?

I don’t think it is productive to pretend things are not as they actually are, any more than it is to pretend that how they are is how they ought to be in a perfect world.

▲seunosewa a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Jensen named his wife and family as victims in his apology letter. I see no reason not to believe him. Under what circumstances might a person's spouse not be a victim of the person's extramarital affairs??

▲t-3 a day ago | parent | next [-]

If they knew and condoned it, for one. A public apology letter is a face-saving exercise and does not necessarily express the truth.

▲kergonath 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

She might be a victim following the publicity. Or many other reasons, really. I am not saying she is, but in some relationships, what you’re allowed to do and what you’re allowed to let the world know are different things.

He might also feel he needed to do it for many reasons, some more self-serving than others.

▲skeeter2020 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

he's the most powerful CEO in the world; you don't even need actual abuse of power when it's impossible to avoid the appearance of abuse. I know that as a coworker of the executive sleeping with the CEO I would completely discount her skills & accomplishments, and his impartiality & judgement, and so would everyone else.

▲vkou 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It doesn't matter if there was an actual abuse of power, or if they were completely consenting adults.

When anyone in the company is fucking the boss and get a raise or promotion, or a good project, everyone in the company who isn't fucking the boss now have a legitimate grievance to sue the company over - that they are being passed over for these things because they aren't fucking the boss.

It doesn't even have to be true. The sheer possibility that it is true is cyanide.

This is part of every sexual harassment training 101 that any manager has ever gone through. (If you haven't gone through it, your employer's opening itself up to a lot of liability...)

▲drtz 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> they were also exec's so I don't think there is any suggestion of abuse of power here.

Everyone reports to the CEO, directly or indirectly, and in this case the CEO is also a founder. The appearance of abuse of power here is plain-as-day.

There's so much coping going on in the comments here it's mind-boggling. Sleeping with your subordinates is enough to get fired just about anywhere.

▲DrScientist 18 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm not condoning it - just saying I don't think it's my place to feel aggrieved on behalf of somebody else based on what's public.

Also note that it's different from having an opinion about Jensen himself.

So it's perfectly possible for me to simultaneously think he has done something wrong ( for the reasons you mentioned ), but also not decide on X or Y were 'wronged'.

Not the same thing.

▲stymaar a day ago | parent | prev [-]

> the time to be believed is now.

We're not talking about sexual violence or harassment though, it's not about “being believed”.

▲estearum a day ago | parent [-]

You think people don't deny consensual affairs, and especially consensual affairs with subordinates?

... what?

▲stymaar 18 hours ago | parent [-]

Of course they do, but they don't usually deny it against the other party in the affair, they deny it to their boss, their wife, whoever they have a liability to, so it's a different situation entirely.

▲estearum 17 hours ago | parent [-]

Not sure what the relevance of that distinction is but… sure…

▲stymaar 22 minutes ago | parent [-]

The distinction exists because why would the person need to “be believed” in such a case? If anything they are more likely to be in the same boat and deny the affair as well.

▲pepitogarvan a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I guess OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs are failing expectations plus open weights models which Nvidia supports and Jensen been super vocal about them and confronting anodes and Altman about dangers of IA have something to do with what we are seeing

▲ChrisMarshallNY a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Reminds me of this classic bit: https://youtu.be/28CPgrWbu20

▲billbuild a day ago | parent | prev [-]

These are the affairs "he got right." Imagine all of the failed approaches.

▲minimaxir 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The better metaphor is "where there's smoke, there's fire."

Three different news orgs have reported the different affairs.

▲austin-cheney 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Yes, one investigation begets others. Also, high profile witnesses come forward voluntarily once the screen is lifted on any unrelated investigation, but not typically before.

▲agumonkey a day ago | parent [-]

I guess nobody cared about the guy who made the chips for video games .. but now he's the guy who runs AI. Much more enticing for news.

▲smolder 20 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I honestly don't care about Jensen Huang. The C-suites get too much credit. Who are the engineers that proposed the gpgpu architecture, CUDA, or the addition of tensor cores?

▲TrnsltLife 15 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah. While we're rolling out the billionaire taxes, we should make sure the hard working engineers in the trenches get their fair share of Chinese spies too.

Workers of the world unite! Seize the means of (re)production!

▲pixl97 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I mean, when AI is a potential weapon or national security issues, yea it makes a lot more sense that the news along with everyone else would care.

▲estearum a day ago | parent | prev [-]

More importantly than video games versus AI, he's not the guy that runs the company that nearly all of America's economic growth is built upon.

▲fritzo 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

"where someone benefits from the fire, there's arson"

▲zamadatix 2 days ago | parent [-]

Here it seems the dude was just lobbling molotov cocktails at his own house until people started to notice. The conspiracy, if there is one, is what other folks who knew beforehand got out of him before it was made public, not why everyone is now pointing out shit is on fire for him.

▲_ink_ a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It might just be that the one affair learned that she is not the only one and went public. Then the third one also learned that she is not the only one ...

▲snowwrestler 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It does look coordinated, but that doesn’t mean it was pre-arranged.

When you see bird flocks or fish schools moving in coordinated ways, they didn’t arrange all that in advance. They’re observing each other and reacting in real time. Quite a lot of coordinated movements develop this way, among people as well as other animals.

A person who forgets that this type of coordination is possible might end up spending their life endlessly looking for the man behind the curtain in every moment of coordination they come across.

▲afavour 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This happens all the time with news stories and doesn't require conspiracy theories. Once an initial story breaks, other journalists investigate (if they weren't already). No doubt Nvidia started investigating internally and employees will have leaked the findings.

There isn't really even any point in this third story from the point of view of any "coordinated attack". He's already resigned.

▲RussianBot9580 2 days ago | parent [-]

Of course not. The board is finding out all these things on the same timeline we are. They are surprised like Pikachu.

▲bluegatty a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Then lens of scrutiny is what keeps the story rolling.

Media focus works in waves.

▲pixl97 17 hours ago | parent [-]

Yea, tech/security work shouldn't be surprised by this. When a big hole is found in a piece of software it's really common for a few more to crop up simply because a lot of people are looking at it.

▲treebeard901 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Wall Street and the powers that be want total control over AI and the companies involved in it

▲astura a day ago | parent [-]

You think "Wall Street and the powers that be" forced Nvidia's CEO to have affair(s)?

▲treebeard901 16 hours ago | parent [-]

No, but I think there is a financial motivation in coordinating the release of information to destroy him.

Reports that Lutnick and Trump knew about the spy situation for some time and allowed it to continue without informing Jensen goes a long way towards establishing a kind of coordination.

Once you start with the spy and national security angle, then you can get access to internal HR reports, and through these and media coordinating, a misrepresentation of the situation is doing the damage that was intended.

There is no public evidence that she was a spy, that Jensen revealed any secrets during the affair, or that Jensen was involved in any of the blackmarket dealings for GPUs. There is no evidence he exploited his power to have any affairs with anyone who works at nVidia either.

All thats left are two relationships he shouldnt have had with two nVidia employees and that is not criminal, or for many a reason to lose the company you basically created.

Meanwhile, its obvious that the commerce secretary worked with nVidia to slow roll the addition of shell companies where the blackmarket trades were happening. This is the most damning accusation, and if Jensens $25 million Trump ballroom donation was a payment to have them look the other way while nVidia knew they circumvented export controls, then that is a legitimate reason for him to resign. Because that is a series of criminal acts, and you know without a doubt that Lutnick, Trump and others were personally benefitting from this arrangement and is likely why they knew about the "spy" situation and did nothing.

But again, even this is just speculation and we wont know, maybe forever what really went on behind the scenes. Either way, it is a coordinated, well planned action to sort of drip a media narrative to get him out of the way.

▲petesergeant a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's not especially newsworthy that there are rumours a CEO is having an (apparently entirely consensual) affair with one of his employees. It becomes newsworthy if he's also been having an affair with a Chinese spy.

I don't think you can easily run "Jensen Huang had an intimate relationship with [an] employee, according to two people familiar with the matter" unless it's clearly a matter of public interest, which it becomes when it's apparently more than one and on the heels of the other story.

▲t-3 a day ago | parent [-]

Alleged spy. That totally unsubstantiated claim from anonymous sources could as easily be a financially or politically motivated smear as the truth. The way the whole thing has turned into a media circus makes me skeptical to take any of it at face value.

▲uptrails 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are you serious? He had multiple affairs is what's going on. Including one with a spy. And people who wouldn't be believed before are now coming forward.

There's probably some mildly interesting risk-balancing that happened behind the scenes because the intel community apparently knew mid-2026 and only spilled the beans now, but this is entirely of Jensen's own doing. He confessed.

He clearly is a top performer, though, managing four-plus relationships is a big job.

▲toephu2 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

But no one has provided any proof whatsoever the first mistress was actually a spy.

▲mandeepj 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> mid-2026

mid-2025*

▲lenerdenator 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"A coordinated hit"

Do we as an industry really not have the ability to comprehend that 1) you shouldn't be sleeping with your employees and 2) that no matter how much value you generate, there will be people who find that sort of behavior morally repugnant and that it can ruin your career if you engage in it?

▲saalweachter 20 hours ago | parent [-]

Even people who don't particularly care about the moral aspect (a) may find him untrustworthy (if he's lying in his personal life why would you trust what he tells you in your business dealings) (b) may consider it a weakness that can be exploited against your shared business interests (he could be bribed or blackmailed into dealings which don't benefit the company, or embroil the company in legal problems) or (c) lose faith in his judgement, if he's willing to get himself into such a mess.

▲Madmallard a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As others have said I think it's a measure for the opportunists in government and OpenAI and Anthropic to get rid of open weights and Chinese models. Jensen Huang was advocating open weights.

Maybe this time next year using models other than Claude and OpenAI will be illegal somehow with nvidia kernel level implementations to block vram usage to granted to unsigned providers or something.

▲darth_avocado 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Correlation isn’t causation always. Once there’s a scandal, more people start digging, and the more they dig, the more they find. The news cycle continues rewarding more information, so you keep getting more.

▲skeeter2020 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

or maybe a spotlight that encourages more investigation, i.e. smoke => fire? Isn't that more likely than some sort of vast conspiracy?

▲perching_aix a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

just to diversify this subthread a little, i actually do see the perspective: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50476972

tbf, these side affairs i think are more just people piling on

▲ a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲billbuild a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think that the JD Vance camp after the 2026 mid-terms, needs a way to distinguish themselves from Rubio, who has largely been an administration favorite and the VP handles tasks typically delegated to the Secretary of State. Between this which is still forming, and Vance reportedly being vocal about not going to war in Iran, there will be a few distinguishing bullet points. I can't imagine insiders didn't know that the man from one of the world's top two multi-trillion dollar companies was having multiple affairs that could easily be used to blackmail him.

▲estearum a day ago | parent [-]

what?

▲eggdaft a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Bless the fellow HN folks.

It’s a common tactic to make sure the scandal stays on the front page and it’s untenable to try to stay on. Politicians do this all the time. Scandals happen constantly, it they’re saved for when they are most useful. Jensen is in politics, whether he realises it or not.

China may be behind it as an attempt to sabotage America’s economy. But I actually think more likely the Americans as Nvidia haven’t complied sufficiently.

I really feel for Jensen. He’s dedicated his life to Nvidia and really is heavily responsible for its success. It must be devastating to have to step away from it.

▲yellow_lead a day ago | parent [-]

Poor guy forced into all those affairs.

▲eggdaft a day ago | parent | next [-]

No one knows the circumstances. No one can see into a relationship. Be slow to judge.

▲dghlsakjg 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Accepting an $8 Billion deal from an exec at a company who was called out months ago for circumventing export controls on behalf of Chineses interests is a pretty damning circumstance.

Sleeping with that person and the other affairs are just icing on a shit cake.

▲lovich a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

He admitted to an affair. An affair by definition is a bad thing.

You can be poly and sleep with multiple people with the consent of your partners and it’s not an affair.

An affair, being unfaithful, cheating, etc. are all terms used for someone who has breached the terms of their relationship. We don’t need to be slow to judge because he judged himself by using those terms.

▲eggdaft 21 hours ago | parent [-]

You have no idea what the situation in his relationship was like at the time. You don’t know how his wife feels about it, you don’t even know if she knew about it. Be slow to judge.

▲zdragnar 20 hours ago | parent | next [-]

His public apology included apologies to his wife and children for hurting them. It's reasonable to believe that he did in fact disrupt his family life.

▲lovich 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

He admitted he was unfaithful to his wife. I’m using his own, public, judgement

▲avgDev 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You are either Jensen or hold significant amount of the stock.

▲behole 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Holy crow are NVDA paying you to shill this hard in the comments?

▲ImJamal 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Are you thinking somebody held a gun to his head and said sleep with this woman or I kill you? The guy consented to cheating, not just with a spy, but with people under his authority.

▲freecodeio a day ago | parent | prev [-]

it's one of those "tell me you've never been in a relationship without telling me"

▲rvz 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

▲anticorporate 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9100641

▲rvz 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Posting that link is truly pointless.

You understand that the AI labs in the US have taken a lot of money from thousands of investors. They don't benefit whatsoever in losing their investment to powerful open weight AI models that undermine closed weight ones especially chinese AI models that are rapidly catching up to them.

Nvidia was investing the open weight model ecosystem after realizing that the AI labs were moving off of their GPUs and using in-house chips. Jensen made sure that some Chinese AI labs were getting Nvidia GPUs in order to slow them down in relying or building their domestic ones.

Why would someone who invested a lot of money into any of the >1TN+ AI labs accept the risk of a chinese AI lab undermining them in their future IPO plans?

▲ls612 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

As I’m sure you know it can be both true that Jensen was getting side pieces like it was going out of style, and also be true that this is a coordinated hit. Note that the media for instance isn’t racing to investigate the strange sex lives of Anthropic senior leadership.

▲ceejayoz 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

> Note that the media for instance isn’t racing to investigate the strange sex lives of Anthropic senior leadership.

Thus far, there's no evidence Anthropic was knowingly violating sanctions on China, nor did they donate $25M to the Trump ballroom project while doing so.

▲ls612 2 days ago | parent [-]

So you admit that it had nothing to do with the sex and everything to do with Nvidia’s politics in the AI space. Good.

▲ceejayoz 2 days ago | parent [-]

Yes, it's the illegal stuff (bribes and sanction busting), not the legal stuff (consensual, of-age sex), that's getting him booted. I am very prepared to admit that.

(Plus presumably lying to the board about all this as it started to break.)

▲iamflimflam1 a day ago | parent | next [-]

Having secret sexual relationships with your subordinates is a big problem. Anyone claiming the opposite needs to have a careful think.

▲carlosjobim a day ago | parent | next [-]

Anybody thinking that an adult human is "subordinate" to another human outside of a strict military setting is beyond being helped by thinking. Work is just work, it's not who we are.

▲iamflimflam1 a day ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲ceejayoz a day ago | parent | prev [-]

It is a big problem, yes. But it's not typically a criminal one, which distinguishes itself from the weird Anthropic sex cult stuff.

▲ls612 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

From what I had read the sanctions-busting type stuff was really "lobbying the administration to not do anything about it from a regulatory perspective" which is different from just ignoring the law like the talking points claim.

I'm fine with the idea of not selling chips to China, but this is being used as the catalyst to embed government-controlled kill switches in all advanced chips under the guise preventing chip smuggling to China. Read up on the Chip Security Act sometime. Most on HN would find such a policy on its face abhorent, but those like you will cheer it on now because of the partisan affiliation of specific actors in this story.

▲ceejayoz 2 days ago | parent [-]

https://www.wsj.com/business/earnings/nvidias-disappearing-s...

> As recently as the summer of last year, Singapore was officially one of Nvidia’s biggest markets, generating 22% of the chip maker’s revenue. Then, practically overnight, it disappeared from the company’s financial disclosures.

> The timeline indicates that Nvidia altered its methodology for reporting the geographic breakdown of its revenue shortly after placing Megaspeed International on an internal block list. It isn’t clear if the two are related, but the shift had the effect of removing visibility into Nvidia’s sales tied to Singapore. That is the home to Megaspeed, the cloud-computing company embroiled in a sex-and-espionage scandal that has engulfed Nvidia and its chief executive.

Sure, sure. Totally on the up-and-up.

▲ls612 2 days ago | parent [-]

I'm not sure what the point here is? Parts of the government wanted to blacklist Megaspeed, Nvidia apparently first intervened with Lutnick to block this, and then decided to block them internally instead for some reason. The change in revenue disclosure was almost certainly to avoid further complaints about export controls but they never actually violated a control that actually went into place? Worst case for them legally is that they broke their own internal block on selling chips to Megaspeed.

▲ceejayoz 2 days ago | parent [-]

Do you think NVIDIA really thought 20%+ of their market share going to Singapore wasn't something odd going on? Where are you going to put that many datacenters there?

They made out like bandits looking the other way.

▲ls612 a day ago | parent [-]

Of course they did! But Megaspeed was never actually sanctioned by the government so I don’t know where the meme of criminal consequences is coming from, aside from partisanship.

▲ceejayoz a day ago | parent [-]

> But Megaspeed was never actually sanctioned by the government…

This is irrelevant. There's a blanket ban on physically providing these chips to China; if they knew Megaspeed was diverting chips, it doesn't matter if they were on a list or not, just as you can't trade with North Korea via a new front company. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/04/technology/china-ai-micro...

There's a good chance a future Democratic administration sees the $25M ballroom donations as plain old bribery, too.

▲mrguyorama 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

It can also be true that this is the exact pattern you see with powerful men.

Because, the powerful men can hide things for a long time, right up until they are no longer powerful.

That's like the entire point of #MeToo. Women are very upset with how much known misbehavior was going on that was kept hush because the men involved were in positions of power, and people preferred keeping that power structure stable over literally putting people doing sex crimes to justice.

What you are seeing is that when women feel like they will be listened to when they come out with a story like this, they will.

That, and there's also the simple effect of "A rich person is suddenly getting dragged through the media, perfect time to share your own gossip if you have some"

You can't blame this on a conspiracy when such simple incentives will cause the same phenomenon, and we have ample examples of exactly that happening.

▲ls612 2 days ago | parent [-]

So why isn’t that incentive leading to reporters talking about the unusual sex lives of powerful men at Anthropic? It isn’t so much a conspiracy as it is the the Rubio hawk faction eliminating one of their more potent foes.

▲georgemcbay 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> This is the worst case of a classic blackmail operation against Jensen and it is highly co-ordinated with major news outlets like the NYT, WSJ, The Economist and FT.

Jensen was already being blackmailed by the Trump administration for the past year, which Trump all but admits openly here:

https://youtu.be/m2aC8lAOQbg?si=rqqSliGdLF4_Q663&t=1460

@24:20 if the link doesn't maintain the timestamp on your platform.

He doesn't name Jensen, but in hindsight with everything that has come out (including information on the timing of the Rubio memo) he is obviously talking about him and threatening him with jail to become a yes-man, and Jensen complied.

So IMO the real question isn't who was blackmailing Jensen (we know that), the question is: when he was already complying with blackmail for a year, who decided to burn him as an asset? Did it come from the people who were blackmailing him, or an external source? And who gains/loses by the loss of leverage they already had on him?

▲breakwaterlabs 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> What's really going on?

A lesson, apparently, for everyone asking "what the big deal is".

If ever you wanted to understand the meaning of the word "liability", here it is.

"Coordinated hits", as you put it, have as their prerequisite the creation of a "liability".

▲dofm 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Journalism plus circumstances loosening tongues and reducing the downside of being truthful.

As the British police are fond of saying in cold case appeals: allegiances shift.

▲Betelbuddy 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Dont mess up with the intelligence community. He should have talked more to Jack Ma.

▲oh_no a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> What's really going on?

him sleeping around, hth

▲nozzlegear a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A serial adulterer is revealed to have adulterated serially, and SV types are spilling oodles of ink attempting to justify loose morals and bad decision-making so long as it brought increased shareholder value.

▲ a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲ a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲kshacker a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I am reminded of the tv series "the shield". When it ends, our guy is asked "what all do you have to declare". I am paraphrasing.

Pretty sure the board asked the same question. Having finally been called to do their work, they can't just close the books without asking "what else do you have to declare" to both Jensen and at least all the direct reportees. And if there was a declaration, you can always find someone to leak it to the media.

Not saying that happened, just saying that it is likely such direct questions were asked and answered last few days.

▲mrcwinn 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Agree. Jensen definitely orchestrated a coordinated hit on multiple employees.

▲vonneumannstan 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah IDK maybe sleeping with a Chinese Spy and then circumventing US Export bans might be a bad thing. Maybe just don't do that.

▲sweetdingoes a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Buy low, sell high

▲sandworm101 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>> What's really going on?

A shell game. This is the distraction portion. Then comes the switch, the reveal and the swipe. Watch the market indicators. Nobody buying and selling shares in a trillion-dollar company cares one iota about extramarital affairs. Something else is happening.

▲noident 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

They might not care about affairs, but they are probably interested in the possibility that Nvidia circumvented US export controls, is being covertly influenced by China, and so on

▲oceanplexian a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

First person who gets it. It’s 2026, there is no moral panic here. Shareholders don’t care. It’s all completely fake and orchestrated as cover for some other purpose (To offload shares or otherwise).

▲david_shi a day ago | parent | prev [-]

A financial casus belli, real or manufactured.

▲drewbeck 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's weird, right? You see the same thing in police investigations. Oh, they know some things early, then, later, release more information? We're not that dumb.

When a real scandal happens, everything we know or will ever know gets dropped all at once. Anything else and you know someone is pulling the strings. The question is who? My money is on the arrow of time.

▲agumonkey a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

wait until you hear he uses ATI chips at home

▲itemize123 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

he's getting investigated? are you under a rock

▲stasomatic a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Entrapment, they (FBI, whatever) knew about the "spy" and yet didn't go like ... "Hey Jensen, we gotta tell you something..." Pathetic.

▲ a day ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
▲yubblegum a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> What's really going on?

Jensen was not on the Epstein list. That omission is now coming back to haunt him.

▲iAMkenough 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As it turns out, Huang was a fallible human being.

▲fourside 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

It sounds like it’s a bad idea to have a single fallible human be “the face of the AI book powering the US economy” as the NYTimes is calling Jensen.

▲transcriptase a day ago | parent [-]

Better Jensen than Sam or Dario.

▲Argonaut998 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

So is Musk. So were Gates and Bezos

▲ranger_danger 2 days ago | parent [-]

Almost like being a billionaire requires being a terrible person willing to take advantage of others to get ridiculously too far ahead.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6688834/

▲cperciva a day ago | parent | next [-]

Are Patrick and John Collison terrible people? My impression is quite the opposite; they're smart, hard working, and care deeply about making the world a better place.

There's a Canadian billionaire who is famously always donating to hospitals and suchlike. He's had tens of thousands of employees for decades and I've never heard anyone say anything bad about him.

I know another billionaire in Vancouver who isn't known for donations. Actually most people don't know he's a billionaire. He is generous though; he just insists on being anonymous when he gives large amounts.

I suspect the issue is less "billionaires are horrible people" and more "the highest profile individuals from any group tend to be the narcissists".

▲captainbland a day ago | parent | next [-]

I think it's clear that rhetorically you can't single out individuals without proof but at the same time it's also fair to say there is just a lack of information.

The argument that, for the most part, you need to extract from and exploit others to get to this level of wealth is relatively strong and has correlates with other negative behaviours I would say is the core issue at play here.

▲parthdesai 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's a useless reddit trope. As usual, humans are complex, and billionaires are no different. Look at Mark Cuban for example, he is trying to bring affordable medicines to common people in USA (I don't know the finer details). Or Jim Simons, who for all accounts did a decent bit of philanthropy and provided funding for academic research.

▲georgemcbay 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> Almost like being a billionaire requires being a terrible person willing to take advantage of others to get ridiculously too far ahead.

Turns out that taxing their wealth is an intervention.

We need to do it if only for their own good to save them from the pressures that cause them to act increasingly antisocial.

▲lhd1 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

journalists pumping their sources