| ▲ | nuclearsugar 18 hours ago |
| These days I must make a real effort to be social on a regular basis. Personally I've found satisfaction in going to meetups to find like minds. I also go with my gut and in the moment ask to swap Instagram usernames with interesting people and promptly schedule with them to get coffee. If they prove to be as interesting and kind as I had sensed, then I invite them to a potluck dinner party which I throw every other month. In this way, I invite people under my umbrella, keep them in my life by regularly seeing them, slowly build a friendship, and hopefully they make friends with the regulars at dinner party. I must continually remind myself that I am the instigator and it's feels quite strange as a heavily introverted person. I don't particularly enjoy being the instigator for most social occasions but the pros outweigh the cons. |
|
| ▲ | 1659447091 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > I must continually remind myself that I am the instigator and it's feels quite strange as a heavily introverted person. I don't particularly enjoy being the instigator Once I figured out that this was a skill and not just something people that are not me are born with, it made things a lot easier. Went from making up all kinds of stories in my head about myself and others to thinking about each interaction as practice and realized lot more people were like me, thinking I'll be invited somewhere or talked to if I was liked or was interesting enough; waiting for someone else to do the inviting or talking first. I just remind myself that a lot of others also want to be invited or talked to, and that reminder greatly reduced my fear of rejection. |
| |
| ▲ | nuclearsugar 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Indeed I've had a similar realization and it's a very helpful reminder. Also every time I go to a meetup, I remind myself: to be interesting, you must be interested. | | |
| ▲ | 1659447091 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > to be interesting, you must be interested. I think thats the crux of it, most people respond positively when others are interested in them. As long as its genuine, asking about, or be interested in, others goes a really long way. | | |
| ▲ | c0nsumer an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Interestingly, this is what the book "How to Win Friends and Influence Others" gets at. While it's ostensibly a sales book, the very basis is how to be genuinely nice to people so they want to talk to you and be around you. And from those relationships come sales opportunities. As another person for whom relation stuff does not come naturally, this was incredibly helpful because little pieces of advise really do work, because they really are nice things to do/say. A favorite example of mine, when starting to talk to someone who probably already doesn't care for you is to find something -- anything -- that it's clear they like or chose, which you also happen to like, and pay it a genuine positive complement. And perhaps talk about it a little bit. | | |
| ▲ | jmaw 34 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I've heard a lot of negativity around this book, and haven't read it yet. Did you feel like it was positive in the sense of genuine niceness, or negative in the sense of trying to be manipulative, etc.? |
| |
| ▲ | rubicon33 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It helps to know a thing or two, about a wide range of topics, for this reason. Take for instance someone telling you about their career. "I'm a software developer". You can express interest with a response like "Oh, thats cool, what made you go into that line of work?" but thats a very generic, shallow response. If you know a thing or two about software, for example, you can ask more interesting questions that show your interest in them, and your knowledge of the space. "Woh cool, how is AI coding impacting your life?" Suddenly, it seems like you're much more interesting yourself, AND you're interested in them. The tricky part nowadays is everyone has very niche interests. It's harder than ever to really have a breadth of knowledge that is broadly applicable. This was easier before the internet, before travel, before telecommunication. When your community was your community and news traveled slowly, it was a lot easier to learn about what impacted others. | | |
| ▲ | roncesvalles 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I love being asked "what made you go into that line of work?" because I can answer with "mostly the money" (which is a very honest answer yet socially somewhat inappropriate), and their reaction to my answer immediately gives me a signal into whether we're going to be close or not. Some people act so shocked when you tell them you did something because it would make you richer and not because an angel came to you in a dream and whispered in your ear to save the disenfranchised underclass (and all the cats) by writing code, or whatever's the current faux na pas reason to pursue a vocation these days. | | |
| ▲ | ZenoArrows 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think the reason they act that way is because you're signaling to them that you dislike your job. Which is fine, but ideally you'd find some gratification in it that isn't just monetary, since it's what you spend most of your time doing. Money can only compensate so much for a shitty job. | |
| ▲ | dimaaan 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I respect the honesty. Curious, though: would you say that in a job interview too? | | |
| ▲ | roncesvalles 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | No, and I'd also judge the interviewer hard for asking that question. I don't like interview questions that are really just cues to start spewing rehearsed bullshit. |
| |
| ▲ | gn_200826 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | One of the best signals I found for whether I will enjoy my conversation with someone is if they commit a small social faux pas |
| |
| ▲ | yshamoun 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I agree with your point, but as a software developer I’d much prefer the generic response in your example. | | |
| |
| ▲ | Razengan 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > most people respond positively when others are interested in them. To be fair, most people are uninteresting. Maybe the goal should be to be okay with being ordinary. TRYING to be interesting (or interested) is just tiresome. | | |
| ▲ | weatherlite 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Depends on how we define interesting. Interesting in itself is pretty overrated imo, I don't need you to be some artist who lives in the streets and is addicted to heroin - I mean that's really interesting but not something I want in my life.
Be boring - have a 9-5 job like me.
But be agreeable, be interested in me as well from time to time and we can relate.
Whether we truly hit it off is not about how interesting I am to you or you are to me I think. | |
| ▲ | myaccountonhn 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Ordinary people can be interesting though. If you meet someone who is completely and utterly uninteresting, that in itself is interesting. | | |
| ▲ | t-3 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Most people are completely and utterly uninteresting. I feel that interest in people is largely a physical reaction rather than a thought exercise. Even people who have done cool stuff are often uninteresting. Their story may be interesting, but their person is not. | | |
| ▲ | criddell an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > Their story may be interesting, but their person is not. What do you mean by that? What's the difference between a person and their story? | |
| ▲ | master-lincoln 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | that's subjective and not worth discussing much if you do not specify what makes a person interesting for you | | |
| ▲ | t-3 an hour ago | parent [-] | | I don't really know. Why do we get along with some people but not others? There's probably a definable reason but it's not usually a conciously-reasoned thing that can be easily specified or classified. |
| |
| ▲ | weatherlite 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Most people are completely and utterly uninteresting How do we even define interesting ? Like interesting opinions/hobbies? Good storyteller ? Who cares about that. I do need to like you and you need to be an agreeable person imo, but no having a real unique life or opinions is really not that necessary imo. Having a sense of humor is a big plus to me though. | | | |
| ▲ | inSumErgoCogito 44 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Because people expect another person to be a amusement park- a show. They are not. They are a information processing system- often not even fully self-aware of the information their subconcious weaves into complex ideas. Surveilance and reflection does not improve that performance or allows to reproduce it. It instead produces distraction. This is why you can not "interview" innovative or creative people- and only get a flat "imposter" image of the creative person. The observation hinders the process and all you get is basically the "house keeping" routines- weaving together some plausible stories, on how a "idea" came to be. The true process is a walk in the mountains. Some scribbled notes. Glued together during some conversation on a similar topic with friends. I always found it fascinating, how the "iterrators" can dismiss something/someone that clearly works- just because they can not dissect and reproduce it. |
| |
| ▲ | adrianN 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | There are no uninteresting natural numbers. One, as the smallest natural number, is certainly interesting. Assume all numbers up to n are interesting. If n+1 is uninteresting it is the smallest uninteresting number and therefore interesting. And yet everybody cares precisely nothing about almost all natural numbers. | | |
| |
| ▲ | Razengan 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Also, you don't have to be interested in each other: Find a shared interest. And it doesn't have to be anything special; you could find joy together in the mundane: Petting cats, watching the rain, taking a walk through the woods without saying anything.. | |
| ▲ | watwut 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Normal people are interesting. |
|
| |
| ▲ | dingdongditchme 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Being interested is also a lot more easy than to be interesting. The latter really depends on the eye of the beholder. Whereas I make it a game to find out what is interesting about the person across from me. Sometimes I strike gold, sometimes it's a dumpsterfire and we implicitly agree never to talk again. But once you strike gold and meet people you genuinely are really interested in, you get addicted. |
| |
| ▲ | everdrive 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | >Once I figured out that this was a skill and not just something people that are not me are born with, Agreed, but I'm not so sure this was previously true. Or at least not _as_ true. There used to be a lot of more socializing by default. People who were poor in this skill set still had relatively regular social opportunities. This seems to be gone today, and now it's purely manual. |
|
|
| ▲ | keybored 4 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Same as last time.[1] The ones who “make an effort” go to top of the thread. Why are things the way they are? static Make dinner for friends. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49892789 |
|
| ▲ | bubbluppugus an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I got tired of being the planner. As soon as I stopped it all stopped. And like really all stopped; via digital comms everyone from the social group has said they realized after the plans I pulled together was their extent of their social life. American culture fuckin' sucks. And it's Americans propping it up. It isn't Russia or the other usual boogeymen. |
|
| ▲ | sasaf5 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| +1 for the potluck dinners. I find much satisfaction in seeing my social circles merging. Another lost art is keeping a contacts list and contacting them regularly. People used to have these lists on paper and then send cards at least once per year on birthdays/christmas/independence. With this being relegated to social media, your contacts often fall in the cracks of the quirks of tech companies. |
| |
| ▲ | decasia 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Every year I make some (handmade) digital art and write a letter with it about our year, and then I email it (bcc’d) to all our friends, family, and other people we want to stay in touch with. It’s not as tangible as a paper card but by being an email, people can just hit reply and answer. Every year a few dozen people write back to our card (out of maybe 350 recipients), and a lot of people have said that this is one of their favorite messages to get all year. I think people can tell when you actually put time into something instead of just making a quick conventional card with platitudes. It’s helped us keep in touch with people from all over the place, across different continents, etc, who we might not stay in touch with so much otherwise. | |
| ▲ | hollowonepl 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yep, I used to merge my circles often in the past, usually at restaurants and bars. I did not think about it otherwise though than optimizing my available time to target as many friends from different groups as possible. But this also created a group of its own that I was coining together for regular Thursday craft beer night or occasionally having wine and beef together. I stopped though, many years ago as when I started my own family, family and work consumed me too much to have regular night life and meetup exercising and my home was always my sanctum, I rarely invite people to my home. this is where i rest and only some inner circle has entrance there. that inner circle was developed during last 20+ years and I don't find much space to expand this circle unless somebody new spends with me 20+ years having random access to my limited time. And that's ok. having up to 5 close friends who you see and talk to regularly if you're 45+ is already enough. Random folk... can stay online. like here to share ideas and then bring them back home. I actually stopped looking for new friends based on the interests.. I have enough in that gang to cover already. sharing interest related insights is where I use internet mostly. one of the reasons why place like HN started becoming attractive again as after ditching FB, Discord and many other places with just noise instead of valuable insight and content only HN, lobsters and telnet/ssh BBSes become legitimate sources of idea sharing and tech progress. other topics are covered fine for decades and when I'm randomly at bar sometimes (usually work delegations outside my own town) then I'm open for one evening conversation about any nonsense just to stay connected with the city folk, but no huge expectactions about phone sharing or another meeting. I never share my social accounts connection with strangers. I stopped doing that.. it's just spam after all and like collecting f* pokemon cards instead of having meaningful relationship. One can't maintain relationship with 1000+ people so I dropped all that and keep online activities either socially anonymous or narrowed to under 100 people whom I at least remember I had a drink with, once. |
|
|
| ▲ | BLKNSLVR 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You're doing good work, not just for yourself, but for others. Sometimes, it may be just the knowledge that you're contributing positively to other peoples lives that makes it worth sacrificing some of your own comfort. |
|
| ▲ | elric 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Personally I've found satisfaction in going to meetups to find like minds I enjoy meetups, but those have been pretty much nonexistent here since covid. |
| |
|
| ▲ | satellites 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This mirrors my experience quite a bit. Hobbies that involve creative thinking and leaning on each others' skills are incredible at creating lasting social bonds which go beyond the hobby itself. For me that's music (creating it) and tabletop gaming (especially D&D or any similar RPG). Meeting others through those activities and then gradually building upon the relationships via other social outings, dinner parties, weekend trips etc. I'm also introverted but learned early on in life that it often just takes one person instigating things to rally a whole group. |
|
| ▲ | anonzzzies 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| YMMV but I find people who want to exchange socials like insta far less likely to meet up again then just old fashioned phone numbers. To such an extent that I exchange socials and not waste the time. |
|
| ▲ | weatherlite 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Dang you're on top of things, kudos. Wish I had the mental energy to do all that. |
|
| ▲ | Gee101 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Does it get easier overtime for you? |
| |
| ▲ | 1659447091 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Does it get easier over time for you? Not OP, but wanted add for myself it did. I took the CBT approach. First to change how I thought about things (as a skill to practice) and then that allowed me to do a form of exposure therapy. Mostly finding something small to start with, a single relevant question or comment that is genuine. Saying something nice to someone, like a stressed out cashier at the grocery store goes a long way, or commenting on something like someone reading the packaging of a item and you know it and can give a brief review. I didn't start trying to have deep conversations or expectations of ever seeing that person again. Only simple interaction for social skill improvement and over time this small talk started to come more naturally. Then that snowball into this lighter feeling around people (so anything would have been perceived as rejection before became not personal and moved on) and that, in gaming terms, was a level-up to more meaningful interaction, then another level-up and another etc. This is a decades long practice that is still going. Like many skills some pick up faster than others. | |
| ▲ | nuclearsugar 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Overall yes. When I attend a meetup then I have a mindset of putting myself out there and should I meet an interesting and kind person, then just ask to get coffee with them sometime and talk shop. Also I remind myself that the current conversation went well from my perspective, so probably from theirs too. | |
| ▲ | doc_ick 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
|
| ▲ | dominotw an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| do ppl usually have instagram accounts? |
|
| ▲ | roncesvalles 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm worried that although you might build up a big group of acquaintances that you hang out with on a regular basis this way, none of those would quite fit the definition of "friends". A friend to me is someone with whom you can drop the mask of social propriety near-completely - share unpopular opinions, make racist jokes (directed at them or others), talk about the opposite sex (assuming hetero), gossip about other people, talk about your own relationships, give honest feedback, do borderline illegal stuff like smoke weed etc. Because this is what intimacy means. If I meet my friend after a bad haircut and he doesn't immediately go "what the fuck is wrong with your hair?", he's not a true friend, just someone I hang out with. I think most people stop having friendships like this after grade school or university. I suspect some people have never had a friendship like this. |
| |
| ▲ | phatskat 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think the cool thing about this, especially as an older person (40's), is that it creates a low-stress, high-interactivity scenario. So while some of the people may just be acquaintances that come to one or two potlucks, some will inevitably click and become more than just once a month dinner guests. Forming friendships after schooling isn't hard, but it takes work. That said, I've had a good number of small social interactions that usually don't even lead to an acquaintance over the last decade, and even those feel good just to get out of my shell. Then there's the people I'd recognize if I saw them again and maybe remember their names. And a small but close group of about 12 and counting have become incredibly close friends that have recently begun mingling with my prior set of really close friends (different states, so we have a couple yearly gatherings). | | |
| ▲ | roncesvalles 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | But that interactivity is pretty hollow. I'm sure it cures the itch but it's not the same as having a friend. | | |
| ▲ | phatskat 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | How do you know that it's hollow? Beyond that, the second half of my first paragraph was about how some of those people probably become more than just acquaintances. | |
| ▲ | Larrikin 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think you don't realize how hollow the initial interactions were with the people you consider friends now. You have to start somewhere. It's just when you are younger you do not have a baseline of what a really good friend is. |
|
| |
| ▲ | weatherlite 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I hear you but maybe not everyone wants this. It sounds great but it's also high investment/high effort and sometimes hurts and disappoints. I think some people are fine with having shallower relationships than that. | |
| ▲ | Mashimo 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > , none of those would quite fit the definition of "friends". Why can't the big group of acquaintances not lead to real friendship? I would haver guesst that's the way you find friends. Stranger -> acquaintances -> friends -> close friends? | | |
| ▲ | roncesvalles 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Often it stops there, that's what I mean. A big group of people to hang out with could give you the illusion of having friends when it's not really friendship, because it lacks the deep intimacy that comes with a good friendship. There are more people LARPing as friends than are actually friends these days. Then I can see why many people reject "friendships" completely. Just dressing up and doing stuff with a few people is tedious unless it's mainly just about the thing you're doing (such as sports). | | |
| ▲ | Mashimo 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | But how would you get ~real~ friends if not through casual meetups first? | | |
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | roncesvalles 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I mean sure, you could use casual meetups to meet new people, but friendship really develops and exists in a 1:1 context. I re-read the root comment and it seems like the person has the right approach initially - meet at a meetup, invite for 1:1 coffee afterward. But then he invites them to his potluck and I think the friendship dies there. That potluck is like a graveyard of all his potential friendships. It just becomes a "hangout group" i.e. fake friends. Also, every other month is too infrequent. Personally I think the best way to make friends is at places where you might meet them in a context that gives you sufficient and regular 1:1 time. This is almost always school or work. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | watwut 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | To me, being close with someone does not involve being insulted, insulting them or making racist jokes. I also dont particularly care about other peoples haircuts, one way or the other. I do have friends I spend 1 on 1 with who I am completely open with. > I think most people stop having friendships like this after grade school or university. When I was younger, I was never open with people who would be insulting to me or found it important to make racist jokes. I would simply not tell them what I think to avoid conflict or insult. They were assymetrically open, I was not. But I genuinely did not cared about their haircuts either. | |
| ▲ | kingkawn 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Maybe you don’t have friends because you’re a racist in your heart of hearts? | | |
| ▲ | roncesvalles 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | I have plenty of legit friends who enjoy my racist humor, tyvm. Most of us are people of color btw. | | |
| ▲ | Larrikin an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Only other racist enjoy racist humor. Claiming you aren't white doesn't suddenly make racism ok. | |
| ▲ | watwut 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | One comment up, you had no real friends. Now, there are plenty of them. |
|
| |
| ▲ | cindyllm 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
|
| ▲ | TFNA 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There's a post-Covid dynamic in large cities where people often report that meetups are not as social as they once were, that one isn't isn't likely to meet anyone outside the meetup (or perhaps ever again even inside it). It can even be cringe to some when someone like yourself acts as instigator, because there is a gnawing feeling the world has changed utterly and your approach is a futile attempt to go back to the past. I don't know what the solution is, but I don't think it is general social meetups, or hobby meetups, or religions of the lax and casual type (someone posted on a previous HN thread that the Haredim and a comparable Muslim sect seem to be doing alright). |
| |
| ▲ | nuclearsugar 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My experience is that meetups have largely the same dynamic, but the attendees very rarely reach out to get coffee. I can't think of a single instance in recent memory where someone has asked me, and yet I have many experiences where people later thank me for instigating. That used to bother me until I spoke with some people about it and realized it seemingly doesn't happen much these days outside of business pitches. But personally I cannot afford to worry if they think it's cringe. For a long time I was lonely, even in a healthy marriage, but having friends that I see regularly is something that I have found to be a vital aspect of having good mental health and avoiding stagnation. So I continually take the risk and put myself out there when I meet an interesting and kind person. | | |
| ▲ | gambiting 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | My dad used to have our uncle and auntie over for dinner literally every other week, they'd stay until late hours of the night, they'd chat, laugh, listen to music, what have you. And I remember once hearing my mum ask my dad - why do you keep inviting them over, they never invite us in return. And I remember what my dad said - yeah they don't, but I'm doing it because I want to be close to them and I enjoy spending time with them - even if they never invite us over it's still worth it. |
| |
| ▲ | satellites 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Who is reporting this? That has not been my experience at all. Social hobbies are how I make almost all of my friends as an adult (specifically: music and tabletop gaming). It's been very consistent through my entire adult life. I often have to be the instigator at first, but it has led to lasting friendships where everyone contributes. To the degree of traveling overseas together and attending each others' weddings. EDIT: The only "cringe" meetups I've attended were "singles meetups" in my city. Mild desperation and no common interests aren't exactly a social lubricant. Hobby meetups are great because if you're truly interested in the subject matter it's an easy/exciting conversation starter. | | |
| ▲ | TFNA 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you are somewhere with live music, consider yourself lucky. That has declined in many countries in the last decade, as so widely reported in the music press. You mention tabletop gaming. This is exactly the stereotype among friends and colleagues of unfulfilling meetups in a city I recently moved from: multiple games meetups sprung up around the university and public library as a way to get people meeting and talking, but most casual attendees didn't find the natural socializing they hoped for ("people just seem too desperate"), while players keen on the games and not looking for socializing per se complained about the casuals not being commited enough. | | |
| ▲ | satellites 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm near a major city in the US. While live music as an industry is under attack from corporate behemoths like Ticketmaster pricing out small working artists, the local scene for musicians just looking to jam is alive and well. If you live within an hour of any major city in the US you can easily find people to play music with. I think the distinction between live music as a business and live music as a hobby is important; the headlines are talking about the former. (Not to downplay the problems that working musicians are facing. I feel for them). For tabletop gaming, it definitely depends on the game. There certainly are salty regulars who have been playing their specific game for decades and who lack social grace with newcomers. But there are also nicer folks who enjoy teaching newcomers and building a community. It all comes down to having good event organizers. Sounds like the ones you heard about didn't manage expectations or toxic personalities well, which is a bummer. To be clear I've absolutely experienced salty cringe behavior from stereotypical neckbeard gamer types at these events. But I've also met really nice people that I ended up hanging out with independently. Each meetup seems to attract a different crowd so I had to try a few before finding a group that was the right vibe for me. | | |
| ▲ | legerdemain 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | Where do you guys find space to play live music with a group in major cities? An apartment late at night, one floor up from where I live? | | |
| ▲ | piva00 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Rehearsal spaces, small venues cheap enough to be booked by a group of 5-6 people for a day/evening (not necessarily bars or concert spaces), book a studio for a few hours and everyone pitch in. |
|
| |
| ▲ | ButlerianJihad 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Nearly 25 years ago, I had some friends from church who were able to organize a very stable meetup for tabletop gaming, and they met at least 2 times every week in a very large and popular, independent coffeehouse downtown. They had things going smoothly before I joined up, and let me tell you, it sort of saved my life. I was homeless at the time, but they kinda got me addicted to Magic: the Gathering, and at least it was a somewhat benign way to spend my evenings. Note: this wasn't a church activity by any means, even though 3 of us were in ministry together. We didn't evangelize, although sometimes we discussed our common faith. This was strictly personal, social time for everyone. The years we met in that coffeehouse were very successful. We often enjoyed at least 10 people around the table, all sorts of kids, although my church friends were elderly, retirement-age, but very sensitive to the needs of the poor and the street people who often joined us. That coffeehouse eventually closed, so we moved on to a Starbucks, and the stable group became smaller, but more tightly-knit. Eventually, I found a really awesome teahouse that was just a few blocks off the beaten path, and our group moved there. We no longer found ourselves yelling/screaming over the noise of crowds and steamed milk machines. Eventually our group lost nearly everyone except us three. Sometimes we had a guest, but they didn't stay. I don't know why people drifted away. Perhaps we weren't welcoming, or fun, or young enough. But we did diversify our activities into board games, such as Clue, Rummikub, Boggle, trivia, Scrabble, you name it. And the teas and snacks were delicious there. Now one key feature of the group is that one guy was there for the games. He was hardcore, heads-down, "we're playing these games!" with intense concentration. The other lady, she was there for socializing and chatting, but her garage-sale habit had garnered a closet full of games to bring. I was there for both, I suppose, but mainly I liked the social aspect, getting out of the house, having some good boba tea and stuff. The board games were definitely a means to an end. So we all had varying reasons for being there. Sadly, the pandemic lockdowns killed our group for good. Not even the teahouse was able to weather that storm, and they closed their doors permanently, too. I haven't seen my friends in that long a time. We tried doing some online gaming together, coordinated, but it wasn't the same at all! I really miss them, and I really miss the excuse to get out of the house, and socialize, and I wish there was a stable activity that had that sort of impetus in 2026, but all my friends were made through those gaming activities, and as a result, I no longer have any friends. |
|
| |
| ▲ | rightbyte 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > It can even be cringe to some when someone like yourself acts as instigator Yes it can feel cringe but I would argue we need to just accept it as prosocial and not cringe. We are cringe for thinking normal social things are cringe. Like, I would probably have thought OP was after my money like 5 years ago. But now I would just assume good faith. | |
| ▲ | shimman 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Also many people simply aged out of it. When I moved to a major city I'd attend every programming meetup (had something to go to 3 nights/week for a solid 3 years), after covid I found more worthwhile hobbies with others. What COVID broke is that there was no one to take over from the previous club leaders so they mostly just died with nothing to replace them and now the new generation doesn't really know how to rebuild it because they never experienced it. | | |
| ▲ | johnnyanmac 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | On top of meetups evaporating, the big issue is post-COVID meetups meeting 3 nights/week nearly impossible. I have 3 or 4 meetups I try to regularly go to and I'm lucky if they are run monthly. I was recently watching a video mentioning a study that it takes ~200 hours of constant contact on average to make a "close friend" and some 40-60 hours to get go from acquaintance to "casual friend", then 80-100 to be a what you'd simply call "friend". Meeting up for 2-4 hours a month would take years upon years to make anything out if you don't supplement it yourself. | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | shevy-java 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > being the instigator for most social occasions but the pros outweigh the cons It depends on the personality. Some people are very open. Some are not. I find social open-ness much harder than closed-ness. The open-ness approach, though, is most likely the better strategy indeed. It just helps little when people are naturally closed off mentally already. |
|
| ▲ | jdjddkkdd 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | brailsafe 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > I must continually remind myself that I am the instigator and it's feels quite strange as a heavily introverted person Ironically, the potluck style events strike me as the most introverted way to socialize. Not to denigrate the initiative at all, I have two Canadian friendsgivings this month, and they're fun, but I really wouldn't see the hosts frequently otherwise, because they're the ones packing their schedules in advance, moving to the distant suburbs, or just don't get out much. I don't feel like I can hit them up for something more casual, whether it's always true or not, it's more of a calendar event style relationship I have with them. The reason I don't take it upon myself to host these myself is primarily because the substance of my social life comes largely from common interests outside the house that I invest deeply into, some of which are non-event hangouts just to watch movies at theirs, hiking, climbing, billiards bar, coffee and a walk etc... I don't try to find like-minded people as much as I do people that I have enough chemistry with, and build on that. That said, in general it is important to try to take any kind of initiative you can. Friendships don't build themselves, and everyone's scared to stick their neck out. |