| ▲ | alt227 9 hours ago |
| Dont want to plug your TV in to the internet but happy to plug in an Apple TV? I still never understand people who are dead against giving all their personal info and data to one company but are fine with giving it to another. Yes this is an apple thread on HN and so I am expecting to be downvoted into oblivion by the Apple fans who believe Apple is better than any other company with data and security, when they have been proved multiple times to be just as bad. |
|
| ▲ | pchristensen 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Different companies have different track records and incentives with regard to privacy. There may be companies more trustworthy than Apple, but there aren't many companies less worthy than most TV manufacturers. |
| |
| ▲ | alt227 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Right but if you are streaming then you are happy to give all your personal info and viewing habit data to Netflix, Disney, Amazon etc to build ad profiles on you, as well as Apple who own the hardware and are feeding telemetry data into your ad profile on their system. But for some reason Sony or Samsung doing the same on your TV is too far? | | |
| ▲ | throw0101c 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > But for some reason Sony or Samsung doing the same on your TV is too far? The content streamers get your viewing habits by virtue of you viewing their content (like Youtube, or any web site, getting information on what you're looking at by simply logging HTTP GET requests). There is no reason why television OEMs need to do screen captures and send them to the mothership. It's the first- and second-party interaction: you gave money to Sony/Samsung/etc for a product, and after the exchange there is no reason for any further interaction. You have a regular/monthly interaction with content providers: there is at least a valid reason for the content providers to have that information in the first place, and none for the TV OEMs to collect it. | | |
| ▲ | alt227 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can reason it all you want, but regardless of the product type the fact remains you are happy to give your data to one billion dollar company but not another. That is absolutely fine, but IMO it is hypocritical. That is all I am arguing. | | |
| ▲ | throw0101c 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > That is absolutely fine, but IMO it is hypocritical. That is all I am arguing. I am okay "giving my data" to the billion dollar company of (say) Netflix of Disney+ because I need to be able to log into the service and get the video streams. It is a necessary part of getting the service to provide (e.g.) billing information like a credit card. I am not okay with giving my data to the billion dollar company of Sony or Samsung because having a display take in HDMI bits and produce photons on a screen does not necessitate any phone home functionality. I am not okay with Netflix or Disney+ giving data to third parties because doing so is not necessary to provide the service. | |
| ▲ | Nevermark 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't want random people listening in on me, but I don't mind the person I choose to speak to listening to me. Does that qualify as hypocrisy too? You can argue against dealing with any billion dollar company. But drop the hypocrisy framing, it is nonsensical and your point will be stronger without it. | | |
| ▲ | alt227 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Do you think all the apps on your phone that you give permission to use the microphone are only using it when you choose to speak into it? You obviously havent read my posts very well. I have repeatedly said that the hypocrisy is subjective, my opinion only, and I am not trying to convince anyone otherwise. You are entitles to think whatever you want, trust whoever you want, and believe what ever you want. I am entitled to consider it hypocrisy if you are turning a blind eye to tracking from one side but happy allowing it from another. | | |
| ▲ | throw0101c 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Do you think all the apps on your phone that you give permission to use the microphone are only using it when you choose to speak into it? Given that my iPhone has a little LED that lights up when the the microphone (or camera) are active, it is fairly easy to confirm that that the mic is not being used. |
|
| |
| ▲ | ragall an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > but IMO it is hypocritical Your opinion is wrong. There's no hypocrisy, and it was explained to you why some companies have done better than others. |
|
| |
| ▲ | afavour 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > as well as Apple who own the hardware and are feeding telemetry data into your ad profile on their system. Are they, though? Is Apple snooping into the Netflix app’s data to track what you’re watching and phone home with that info? Are there studies showing that happening? Are they selling that data to third parties like the TV manufacturers are? | | |
| ▲ | alt227 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | You seem to be missing a major point. You have signed up to streaming services and they are 100% selling your data and viewing habits to 3rd parties to build ad and tracking profiles. How come you are happy for Disney and Netflix to do this but not Samsung or Sony? As far is Apple is concerned, they have been caught lying about this many times before. I jujst cant get my head around why any person can trust a billion dollar corporation to be 'good'. Here have a few links: https://www.bgr.com/2107512/how-to-prevent-apple-tv-spying-a... https://gizmodo.com/apple-iphone-analytics-tracking-even-whe... https://linustechtips.com/topic/1467686-apple-caught-ignorin... https://medium.com/@michaelswengel/yes-your-mac-is-watching-... https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/11/12/apple-getting-sue... | | |
| ▲ | pc86 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's possible this is a distinction without a difference, but Disney and Netflix provide a service and the data they are selling is integral* to providing that service, meaning they're going to have that data regardless. If you're okay with anyone selling any of your data, it probably makes sense for Netflix to sell data about what you watch on Netflix. Samsung or Sony sell a physical product that does not need internet connectivity, or microphones, or telemetry, or any of that. They jam that stuff in there to increase profits and make it economically infeasible to sell what I think 80% of people on HN would buy if given the opportunity - a large flatscreen TV with no built-in connectivity whatsoever. So anything I can do to make me less profitable to them, I will do. * For certain definitions, anyway. | | |
| ▲ | alt227 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is obviously the line where we disagree, and thats fine. You are arguing that you are happy to give your data to a company if its integral to the service they provide. My opinion is that if you are giving your data to one billion dollar company that is building an ad profile and selling it to 3rd parties, then why have scruples about giving it to another? The ad companies are getting your data one way or another, cherry picking a single device on your home network to ringfence against that seems crazy in my opinion. | | |
| ▲ | piva00 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | The issue is the kind of data, no? I also dislike that my data is being transacted willy-nilly by content providers, it's a very different ballpark when TVs have hidden microphones recording my house, screen capturing if I'm showing personal photos on the screen, and sending that data to the manufacturer. That's a much worse privacy invasion. | | |
| ▲ | alt227 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is the problem. You've read the headlines but havent examined the evidence. Go watch the Gamers Nexus documentary on it, and bring yourself up to speed on exactly what tracking the TVs are doing. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | nozzlegear 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > But for some reason Sony or Samsung doing the same on your TV is too far? Yes. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 1-more 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I got an AppleTV because the modal experience of using webOS on my TV was having my toddler scream "WATCH TRASH TRUCK" while watching a loading spinner. Garbage computer experience. I never disconnected it from the network though. I was watching the NBA Playoffs on broadcast (so no internet involved in the content delivery) and I got an overlay in webOS system fonts suggesting I order delivery food through my TV. I saw it again when watching the World Cup through the Peacock app on the Apple TV. So I watch like a total of 2 hours of sports in Summer 2026 and my kid gets an hour of TV while he eats lunch and webOS works its hardest to make those both suck ass, and the Apple TV Just WorksTM and we can put our weekly Facetime with Grandma and Grandpa on there. Absolute no brainer better experience. For privacy specifically, I'll refer you to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple%E2%80%93FBI_encryption_d... |
| |
| ▲ | alt227 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | For privacy specifically, let me retort with the evidence of Apple giving all of its users data to the US government. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants... | | |
| ▲ | stouset 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | I’m not sure you’ve read your own source. | | |
| ▲ | alt227 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you are trusting an Apple quote telling you what they are not doing, when they are obviously under NDA, then thats your decision. | | |
| ▲ | stouset 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | They didn’t not respond. They unambiguously said they are not participating or even aware of the existence of such a program. That goes a hell of a lot further, and would have opened them up to a hell of a lot of issues if it was false. | | |
| ▲ | alt227 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Where did I say they didnt respond? Do you know what NDAs are? It doesnt seem so. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | afavour 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I would invite you to read all the investigations that have been done on how much various smart TVs surveil households and exfiltrate all kinds of personal data. Then find investigations where Apple TVs are proven to do the same, of which there are none. You’re chalking this up to fanboyism but this is just people making informed choices. In today’s streaming era “just don’t connect anything to the internet” isn’t possible. |
| |
| ▲ | drnick1 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Then find investigations where Apple TVs are proven to do the same, of which there are none. Instead, Apple sends that straight to the NSA.[0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM > just don’t connect anything to the internet A practically e-waste mini-PC running an ordinary Linux distro paired with an airmouse remote is a much better TV box. You don't need streaming apps when you are free to use a Web browser, something Apple won't allow for obvious reasons. No surveillance, no crapware, no ads. It can even double as a console for GOG/Steam. | | |
| ▲ | stouset 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | > The Washington Post indicated that "98 percent of PRISM production is based on Yahoo, Google, and Microsoft" > Apple: "We have never heard of PRISM" "We do not provide any government agency with direct access to our servers, and any government agency requesting customer data must get a court order." | | |
| ▲ | alt227 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, they said the same thing about giving out all your push notifications to the government, before they were caught and admitted they had to keep it secret due to NDAs. Seriously, why do people trust billion dollar corporations to look after the little guy? "In this case, the federal government prohibited us from sharing any information," the company said in a statement. "Now that this method has become public we are updating our transparency reporting to detail these kinds of requests." https://www.reuters.com/technology/cybersecurity/governments... | | |
| ▲ | stouset 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | To whatever extent they’ve been required to comply by the legal authority of the government they operate under, it’s also abundantly clear that they’ve repeatedly gone above and beyond in removing their own ability to comply with such things in the future. | | |
| ▲ | alt227 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | You are completely misunderstanding. Yes they are happy to make a song and dance about not letting authorities into individual phones, the publicity definitely helps them out on that front. However none of it matters because the government already have probes in all their servers, as proved by Edward Snowden, so its game over before you start.
Do you understand what NDAs are? It doesnt seem so because you keep quoting Apple while they have been proven to be under NDAs in the past, so how can you trust anything they say in the future? Its ok, you carry on trusting old Uncle Apple to look after you. I am not trying to convince you of anything. However I am entitled to have my opinion that it is hypocritical to criticise tracking from one company but turn a blind eye to the same thing from another. I have clarified my opinion many times now, feel free to have the last word. | | |
| ▲ | stouset 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you presume that we have a technologically omnipotent government that can defeat secure enclaves, secure exclaves, private cloud compute, e2e encryption, etc., then there’s no point in even pretending to play the game you’re trying to. Even open source software has to run on chips that you have to trust haven’t been backdoored by Uncle Sam. Even open source chips have to be trusted to have been manufactured faithfully. If you presume the government isn’t technologically all-capable, then technical measures can limit and even defeat the observability that even a wildly tyrannical government has into your computing devices. This mindset is both infinitely more useful than yours and more reflective of the world we actually live in. The government now mostly has to rely on 0-day exploits that they hold close to their chest until a target sufficiently warrants burning it. Your paranoia is beyond hysterical and it presumes that these companies are gleefully giving out our data when it is extremely clear that nothing could be further from the truth. Again, Apple has more than any company proven a track record of tying their own hands when it comes to complying to these kinds of requests. In the absence of perfect options, I’ll happily go with the good ones. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | alt227 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Im really not chalking this up to Fanboyism. The same can be said for anyone using a streaming device to avoid plugging their TV into the internet, be it Nvidia or google etc. I am well aware of the recent LG controversy. However In my opinion if you are happy to sign up to Netflix and Disney+ and use a streaming box to give them all your personal data and viewing habits to allow tracking and ad profiles then its pretty hypocritical to target a single company in the chain and call them out for it. | | |
| ▲ | afavour 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You really don’t think there’s a difference between a company collecting data about the usage of their own video library and another company tracking audio with microphones, sniffing local network devices, monitoring all video output and selling all of the above to third parties? | | |
| ▲ | bgarbiak 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Genuinely curious: is there any company caught “tracking audio with microphones”?
And what does it mean? Is it about eavesdropping on users or identifying the content being watched? | | |
| ▲ | drdexebtjl 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | LG TVs transcribe conversations you’re having in the room and store them locally. While they haven’t been caught sending that data anywhere AFAIK, there are known vulnerabilities that lets attackers read these transcriptions. Gamers Nexus had a viral video about them here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IFVTcM28KA | | |
| ▲ | bgarbiak 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | From what I understood, the TV doesn’t actually do that. It can do that when hacked, but that something else entirely. | | |
| ▲ | duchef 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | It does do it but LG claim that it is only used to identify activation words for voice control. It has nothing to do with being 'hacked'. |
|
| |
| ▲ | matwood 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > is there any company caught “tracking audio with microphones”? I think it's become an internet meme because it's hard for the average person to understand the more creepy thing that's happening. All the data points being captured as one goes around the internet allows rich profiles to be built without something as complicated as recording and transcribing audio. | |
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | alt227 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Personally I think when you sign up to Disney+ and you give them things like your DOB, bank details, address, phone number, IP address, its a much bigger base for those companies to start building your ad profile much more accurately. If you have kids you then make a family profile to protect them, but in reality all you are doing is feeding the streaming company information about your kids viewing habits to ad to the ad profiles. All of this is being sold to 3rd parties all over the world, for each streaming service you use. This is without even looking at Apple, who own the hardware you are streaming on and have been caught lying multiple times in the past about data harvesting.
After all that, I feel that unplugging the cord on your TV is completely pointless, and it is frustrating how people gloat about it like they are getting around the system. In reality, you are only giving your data to 4 companies in the chain now, instead of 5. | | |
| ▲ | afavour 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | You’re talking about “fans” and “gloating” and I really can’t understand why you see things that way. Like I said, people accept that streaming services are an inevitable part of their lives and they’re making informed choices to minimise their exposure. 4 companies is indeed better than 5. | | |
| ▲ | alt227 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Im pretty sure I never used the word "Fans" anywhere? If I did please point it out as it wasnt intentional. If you think giving data to 4 companies instead of 5 is fine then thats fair enough, its your own data. In my opinion if you happy to give your data to one billion dollar ad profile selling company, then why squabble about another? However I understand this is subjective, and I am not trying to tell anyone they are wrong. I just dont understand it thats all! |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dbalatero 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Consumer Reports has generally rated them as highest in privacy and security, whether or not they've had any issues in the past. |
|
| ▲ | kimbernator 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I really don't think it's fair to chalk this up to fanboyism. It's really hard to argue that a majority of the platforms natively available on smart TVs are pretty bad, and that they have made a habit of using software updates to cram in more ads. I used a TCL roku TV 10 years and recommended them to everyone looking for a decent budget TV with a good minimal interface. That same exact TV is still used on occasion; the interface has gotten awful and interactions are sluggish. Many platforms have gone the same way: Google TV boxes are known to be broadly awful at this point, my samsung TV's built-in apps got progressively less responsive with more ads on my homescreen over the last few years. I haven't experienced it but I hear complaints about the performance and intrusiveness of LG TVs now as well. After cycling through my options, the Apple TV is the only one that doesn't exhibit the same behavior: It is responsive, has a good interface that looks nice, has a very nice minimal remote, and it works the same today as it did yesterday (and basically as it did 2 years ago). I'm not trying to claim allegiance to any brand, it just seems that somehow Apple is the only one not participating in enshittification, at least not to the same degree. If that changes the Apple TV will be out the door and I'll probably need to roll my own out of some sort of mini PC on an open-source platform. And as one last note, for the time being Apple still has some credibility in terms of privacy. They have revenue streams that work for them without completely ruining their product, and it's my hope they continue with that because as far as I can tell they are the only ones left among the big players. |
| |