| ▲ | sputknick 2 hours ago |
| What do Europeans think of the European economy? From my American perspective it looks like they are trying to lose, trying to fall backwards, trying to become a less prosperous society. No one seems to be building anything, and the governments seem to be preventing anyone who tries to advance from doing so. What am I missing? |
|
| ▲ | vjvjvjvjghv a few seconds ago | parent | next [-] |
| [delayed] |
|
| ▲ | timacles 12 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| US Based big tech is skewing your perception. real world economies dont revolve around social media entertainment and ad serving mechanisms. Take those out of what US "builds" and Us doesnt look very exceptional |
|
| ▲ | andsoitis 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > No one seems to be building anything The article is literally about ASML, the company that builds the most complex machine ever built by humans. I can pick a couple of other companies across a wide variety of industries if you'd like. |
| |
| ▲ | thesmtsolver2 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | And ASML wouldn't be possible without US taxpayer funded research. ASML's extreme ultraviolet (EUV) technology utilized foundational research from the U.S. Department of Energy. > In 1997, ASML began studying a shift to using extreme ultraviolet.[7] Two years later, it joined a consortium, which included Intel and two other U.S. chipmakers, in order to exploit fundamental research conducted by the US Department of Energy. Because the Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) it operates under is funded by the US government, licensing must be approved by Congress.[14] Furthermore, in return for being permitted to join this consortium, ASML committed to the establishment of a US-based research center and to source 55 percent of components for all machines sold in the US from American suppliers.[7] ASML collaborated with various manufacturers to obtain mirrors, including the Belgian firms IMEC and Sematech as well as Germany's Carl Zeiss.[14][15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASML | |
| ▲ | sputknick 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Fair point, ASML is a linchpin in the global economy, and very much a European company. But Europe has a population larger than USA, shouldn't they at least be close to us in leading edge companies? They invented the Industrial Revolution. | | |
| ▲ | philistine an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Europe manages to give a measurably better lifestyle for more people for less money than the US. Europe’s a success. | | |
| ▲ | iririririr 16 minutes ago | parent [-] | | yeah, but what are they doing for the poor billionaires who depend on infinite growth, uh? |
| |
| ▲ | throw__away7391 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It appears to me that in most of Europe there is an unspoken bargain: society provides you with a reasonably comfortable and secure life where your basic needs are guaranteed at least to some level, and in exchange you are supposed to stay in your lane, make sure your ambitions match and follow one of the approved tracks, and leave things like starting businesses to a hidden aristocracy with family money, who for their part generally accept higher demands on their contributions and avoid "vulgar" displays of their wealth in exchange. | | | |
| ▲ | andsoitis an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > But Europe has a population larger than USA, shouldn't they at least be close to us in leading edge companies? An economy is there for the people. If that larger number of people have a higher quality of life than in the US, aren't they wealthier? And if they do it for less money, aren't they wiser? > They invented the Industrial Revolution. And a lot more, my friend! You're welcome. | | |
| ▲ | majormajor an hour ago | parent [-] | | > An economy is there for the people. If that larger number of people have a higher quality of life than in the US, aren't they wealthier? It's a little unclear how it shakes out there. I've met a number of young western Europeans while traveling there who are jealous of the ability of Americans to afford cross-ocean/different-continent multi-week trips to tier-1-hotel-cost cities, while feeling like it's more out of reach to them to find a job that would let them. (Phrasing edited here because, as a reply pointed out, "international" travel in Europe is easy and common due to proximity.) On the flip side, those people also enjoy having much more time off. But hey, at least American isn't as 996'd as China yet? There's no single linear "better" scale. (There are, of course, many Americans without the means to travel to Europe or Asia themselves, who could give two shits about an "innovative" company being based in the US vs anywhere else since it doesn't seem to be helping them personally, but the overall mobility is still higher for now. But that's more due to the age of the country than anything else. History suggests that as low-hanging-fruit continues to close the US will also get more and more of that social stagnation too. It's easier to become upper class when you go to a place without an upper class yet.) | | |
| ▲ | andsoitis an hour ago | parent [-] | | > I've met a number of young western Europeans while traveling there who are jealous of the ability of Americans to afford that travel, while feeling like it's more out of reach to them to find a job that would let them. The statistics tell a story different from those anecdotes: young Europeans are considerably more internationally traveled than young Americans, probably by something approaching a factor of ~2 in the likelihood of crossing national borders in a given year. But they're not necessarily twice as geographically well-traveled. Much of the difference is due to Europe's small countries, open borders, dense transportation network, and cheap short-haul international travel. Look up what percentage of Americans between 25 - 34 have never traveled outside their own country, vs. Europeans in western or Northern European countries. etc. | | |
| ▲ | rietta 34 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I had this exact conversation with a barber on the UPC campus in Barcelona in 2005 (if my memory is right). My reply to his assertion was to ask if he ever considered how large US states are compared to EU countries. People do travel within the USA alone and with their families all the time. Just this week mine crossed three states for a beach vacation and the returned home. International travel is not unheard of but not the same distance scale. If I recall he said something like he had not thought of it that way. I do not recall if we were talking in Spanish or English anymore after 21 years. | |
| ▲ | majormajor 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > The statistics tell a story different from those anecdotes: young Europeans are considerably more internationally traveled than young Americans, probably by something approaching a factor of ~2 in the likelihood of crossing national borders in a given year. But they're not necessarily twice as geographically well-traveled. Much of the difference is due to Europe's small countries, open borders, dense transportation network, and cheap short-haul international travel. Means and using those means for any given particular end are entirely different things. It's hardly surprising that Americans are generally insular and uninterested in non-American things. (This is not a good thing IMO. But it's a thing.) But more importantly, like you say, "interntional travel" in Europe includes, say, "going to the UK from France" vs the overseas 5-to-10hr+ flights that are required to cross the Atlantic to have these conversations in my anecdotes. That's my bad for saying "international" instead of "cross-ocean" or such. So let me clarify that the jealousy here is being able to pay for flights and hotels to spend 2+ weeks across an ocean in cities with $100-or-equiv-per-night-to-$300+-per-night hotel costs. They didn't think they'd ever be able to afford a similar trip to SF or NY. --- The non-anecodotal version of this story would likely be the rise in social-acceptance and popularity of the more right-wing parties in Europe. A lot of people, younger especially, feel like they're getting left behind and aren't interested in mostly-older or born-into-more-money people's generic remarks about how it's still great overall for them. K-shaped economies + "stay in your lane" are how you get Trumps :( | | |
| ▲ | andsoitis 32 minutes ago | parent [-] | | We're on the same page. Yes, young Americans are more likely than young Europeans to have traveled intercontinentally / across the ocean. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | cbeach an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | ASML is not the norm in Europe. It is the exception. The top ten companies by revenue, worldwide, features zero European companies. We in Europe cheer our meddling technocratic leadership while sneering at American risk taking and innovation. We have a fundamental cultural malaise, and those of my friends who feel the same as me have simply left Europe for a better life in the US or other dynamic economies. At this point I feel like a stick in the mud for staying here, and quite honestly, I worry for my children's future here. | | |
| ▲ | majormajor an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | It would be very hard for a country to force it's most ambitious to not leave if there are other places eagerly recruiting them. But when such a pull exists, it's very hard to counter that. Consider the number of non-SV places in the US that have tried to replicate that environment and basically failed. Even the famously "business friendly" places like Texas or Georgia that are success stories for poaching tech companies or film production largely work by having companies move there once they've left the high-growth phase and are no longer chasing strictly the most ambitious would-be-best-and-brightest talent. The success stories there (that aren't just resource-extraction) have come from significant protectionism, essentially forcing a country to build its own version of the mega-companies even if it's a money-loser with copycats building shoddy copies for decades at first. There's no easy way for Europe to magically change that with "culture." There's too many already-established mega-talent-bases in other places to think you can have people just pass up on that in a fully-global-market situation. I would ask instead: why let those foreign mega-corps be so integral to so many basic services of modern life? Perhaps not just Europe, but the entire world, would be better off if we had fewer monoliths and more variations, with more flexibility for local markets to develop different solutions or in different directions. | |
| ▲ | cowpig an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Your children need the number go up? | | |
| ▲ | CamperBob2 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yes. Any other questions? | | |
| ▲ | cowpig an hour ago | parent [-] | | Why? edit: In all seriousness, some numbers I'm concerned about for children are the - % of carbon in the atmosphere - the number of militaristic demagogues in positions of power - the number of hours the average person spends reading propaganda on social media - the parts per million of microplastics in drinking water - the democracy index The sum of dollars consumed, dollars invested, dollars spent by governments, and net exports is a weird proxy signal to obsess over | | |
| ▲ | Kyo91 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Unemployment rate doesn't make the top 5? | |
| ▲ | tshaddox an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Because eventually there will be an asteroid or nearby supernova that will destroy civilization unless humanity’s total wealth and technology have improved vastly between now and then. Stasis is death. | | |
| ▲ | majormajor an hour ago | parent [-] | | I don't find it likely that my kids or grandkids will have better odds of avoiding asteroid or supernova death by working to death to try to become interplanetary ASAP. I think doing so would introduce far more risks to them. Space ain't friendly. Beyond that I find it hard to care to drive anyone to work their ass off today for whatever humans are around 100+ years in the future. And, of course, more technological development brings more chance of mass self-inflicted die-off of humanity anyway. In 1900 it would've been much harder to kill 10%, 20%, 50%, 90% of the global population than it is today. Everything is death eventually. And predicting the future is hard. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | tlogan 33 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I do not live in Europe, but I have a lot of friends living there, mostly in Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland. We recently met in Croatia, and after a few beers this topic came up. We came to the conclusion that the following crises caused Europe to start lagging behind the rest of the world: - 2008 financial crisis. Somehow, the U.S. was able to spend its way out of the crisis, while Europe's strict austerity measures made things quite bad. That was followed by the 2010-2012 debt crisis, the 2013 Cyprus banking crisis, and another Greek debt and banking crisis in 2015. - COVID: Most European countries, at least those with strong economies, had very strict restrictions and closures. The restrictions were as strict as they were in California. They did not really have any Texas or Florida style "rebellion" states. Sweden was the main exception. But borders and travel restrictions still existed. - Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Europe was much more economically integrated with and dependent on Russia (especially for energy), than the U.S. or many other parts of the world. So basically, the world has gone through three major crises in the last 15-20 years, and in each case the U.S. was either less directly affected or somehow managed the economic consequences better than Europe. |
|
| ▲ | mciancia 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Most people in my circle in EU seems to see it in similar way. Not much we can do about it though :( |
| |
| ▲ | georgeburdell 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The guillotine was invented in Europe. Some of your ancestors found this to be an effective way to effect a government that works for the people. |
|
|
| ▲ | caidan 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They think the same of you… |
|
| ▲ | dminik an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm not a particularly big believer in infinite growth, so I'm not really concerned. But, I have noticed that many people both complain that nothing is being built, but also NIMBY. Could be the goomba fallacy... |
|
| ▲ | rudiiffj3748 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Hype. And I don’t mean this pejoratively although it has negative consequences — the US does hype better than anyone. The challenge for the US is that people can exploit hype to the point that its effect gets diminished (eg Tesla) which might have long term consequences for the sustainability of the hype machine |
|
| ▲ | dboreham 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Have you ever been to Europe?? Things they are building: proper trains; proper roads; proper particle accelerators; proper airliners; proper bread; proper cars; the AI that the USA thinks is so amazing; ARM CPUs; ... And speaking of "a less prosperous society" -- have you been to most of the USA recently? Doesn't look very prosperous to me vs most of Europe. |
|
| ▲ | RandomOnyx 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Reading between the lines, I blame essentially the opposite thing: too much neoliberalism, preventing governments from enacting effective industrial policy (for ideological reasons, not as a choice for a plausible pathway to the desired outcomes). There is some but too little and too indirect. The focus is more on doing as little as possible than on really doing things, on giving permission and as-small-as-possible incentives for things to be done rather than causing them to be done (let alone straight up doing them - neolibs recoil in horror). That's how I see it anyway, almost everyone else wants to double down on neoliberalism ie the negation of industrial policy. Except perhaps Frank Heemskerk from the article, who mentions wanting governments to create demand for made-in-europe chips so that fabs get built to supply that demand. |
|
| ▲ | surgical_fire 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think it is alright. I actually had the choice to move to the US and I picked Europe instead. If the measure of "winning" is chasing any current hype so that line goes up no matter the cost, I would rather not be in such a place. |
|
| ▲ | stein1946 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > What do Europeans think of the European economy? First of all there is no such thing as "Europeans"; you have French, Germans, Italians etc. > From my American perspective Your American perspective is one created by American media, ie. corporate instruments whose job is to rationalize the American way of life and paint European regulators as some sort of backward ethnics not manifesting. > No one seems to be building anything You overestimate the amount of people/companies who are _actually_ building something. Watching red-eyed delusional Americans dropping by presenting an AI wrapper as innovation barely registers as "building". > What am I missing? The point. Do you understand what the purpose of the government is?
Do you understand how labour and capital work?
Do you understand how the managerial class swindles semi literate investors by seeming to be building jack shit? PS: Are there any hackers actually left in this site? |
|
| ▲ | xyzsparetimexyz 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yes, the situation in Europe is bad. But at least we're not being destroyed in a war by a bunch of guys driving toyotas. |
| |
| ▲ | mciancia 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I would say they do more damage to Europe then US | |
| ▲ | ceres 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What’s wrong with Toyota? | | |
| ▲ | Terr_ an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | They're referring to the idea that a particular Toyota pickup (Hilux) has become oddly popular for any group with the means and motive to bolt a machine gun onto a consumer vehicle. Not from any wrongdoing on Toyota's part, but a combination of it being cheap, reliable, repairable, etc. | |
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | dboreham 28 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Nothing but it would be more ironic if they were driving Mercedes. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | coredev_ 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think it's great. I think whatever you are doing in the US under Trump we do best doing the opposite. I am so glad that I don't have to live in the US right now. If this is loosing we should do even more of it. |
| |
| ▲ | raddan 32 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I disagree with the downvotes. As an American I ALSO think that we should be doing the opposite. |
|
|
| ▲ | Insanity 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://statisticstimes.com/economy/united-states-vs-eu-econ... If you focus only on tech the discrepancy is larger than if you include the wider economy. Even though USA is ahead economically, the EU is still the second largest player globally and the gap is probably not as wide the HN bubble makes it seem. |
| |
| ▲ | revnode 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | This ignores the population differences between the two. When you look at GDP per capita, things are quite stark. | | |
| ▲ | andsoitis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | An economy is there for the people. The people in Europe seem to have a higher quality of life than those on the other side of the Atlantic, don't you think? | | |
| ▲ | CamperBob2 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Is that why they're electing far-right parties at an unprecedented rate? | | |
| ▲ | andsoitis an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Is that why they're electing far-right parties at an unprecedented rate? According to a recent Guardian article, the reasons are immigration and the far-right's ability to masterfully tell a story how things were better in the idealized past. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jun/24/nearly-quar... Perception is reality in people's minds and therefor shapes reality, but it isn't necessarily true. |
|
| |
| ▲ | joakleaf 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The EU is not a single country. It feels like a lot of Americans at the moment think of the EU as a single homogeneous entity that they often also just confusingly refer to as “Europe”. Even the EU is a lot of different countries. Some of them quite poor, and some of them wealthier also with high GDP per capita. GDP per capita does also not give you the whole picture. It is a number. Other numbers are median life expectancy, shootings per capita, PPI, median income, average vacation days, average distance to nearest high-speed rail station, physicians per capita, average number of pupils in a school class. Unemployment rate. Air quality. GDP per capita is one indicator among many that says something about the country’s or region’s inhabitants, but in itself it is just a measure of how much money is being moved around annually. And it is potentially quite misleading. You could have a high GDP per capita and a poor population, if all the money went to large cooperations and billionaires. I am not saying that everything is rosy in the EU, but just that there are also other important indicators and that it is a lot more complicated than just looking at GDP per capita across the entire EU. | | |
| ▲ | dmitrygr an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Even the EU is a lot of different countries. Some of them quite poor, and some of them wealthier also with high GDP per capita. All poorer than Mississippi per-capita | | |
| |
| ▲ | throwaway-11-1 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah compare the GDP per capita of Mississippi to Germany and then tell me which has a better quality of life. | | |
| ▲ | Insanity 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Germany, not even comparable lol.
Affordable healthcare, clean living spaces, decent wages for the majority of people. Also, Mississippi has the highest gun death rate in the US.. Not sure how much feeling safe should factor into QoL for you but that's a pretty significant one in my book |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | cowpig 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| lose what? |
| |
|
| ▲ | gregjw an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Holy Kool-Aid. I mean, Europe built ASML, for one. |
| |
| ▲ | petcat 13 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Europe did not build ASML. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EUV_lithography You can read the history and learn that the technology was developed almost entirely by the US government Department of Energy, Intel, IBM, and several Japanese companies. ASML is an important company but it is largely just an integrator of tech and process IP licensed from many different countries. |
|