Remix.run Logo
▲ cbeach an hour ago

ASML is not the norm in Europe. It is the exception.

The top ten companies by revenue, worldwide, features zero European companies.

We in Europe cheer our meddling technocratic leadership while sneering at American risk taking and innovation. We have a fundamental cultural malaise, and those of my friends who feel the same as me have simply left Europe for a better life in the US or other dynamic economies.

At this point I feel like a stick in the mud for staying here, and quite honestly, I worry for my children's future here.

▲majormajor an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It would be very hard for a country to force it's most ambitious to not leave if there are other places eagerly recruiting them.

But when such a pull exists, it's very hard to counter that. Consider the number of non-SV places in the US that have tried to replicate that environment and basically failed. Even the famously "business friendly" places like Texas or Georgia that are success stories for poaching tech companies or film production largely work by having companies move there once they've left the high-growth phase and are no longer chasing strictly the most ambitious would-be-best-and-brightest talent.

The success stories there (that aren't just resource-extraction) have come from significant protectionism, essentially forcing a country to build its own version of the mega-companies even if it's a money-loser with copycats building shoddy copies for decades at first.

There's no easy way for Europe to magically change that with "culture." There's too many already-established mega-talent-bases in other places to think you can have people just pass up on that in a fully-global-market situation.

I would ask instead: why let those foreign mega-corps be so integral to so many basic services of modern life?

Perhaps not just Europe, but the entire world, would be better off if we had fewer monoliths and more variations, with more flexibility for local markets to develop different solutions or in different directions.

▲cowpig an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Your children need the number go up?

▲CamperBob2 an hour ago | parent [-]

Yes. Any other questions?

▲cowpig an hour ago | parent [-]

Why?

edit: In all seriousness, some numbers I'm concerned about for children are the

- % of carbon in the atmosphere

- the number of militaristic demagogues in positions of power

- the number of hours the average person spends reading propaganda on social media

- the parts per million of microplastics in drinking water

- the democracy index

The sum of dollars consumed, dollars invested, dollars spent by governments, and net exports is a weird proxy signal to obsess over

▲Kyo91 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Unemployment rate doesn't make the top 5?

▲tshaddox an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Because eventually there will be an asteroid or nearby supernova that will destroy civilization unless humanity’s total wealth and technology have improved vastly between now and then. Stasis is death.

▲majormajor an hour ago | parent [-]

I don't find it likely that my kids or grandkids will have better odds of avoiding asteroid or supernova death by working to death to try to become interplanetary ASAP.

I think doing so would introduce far more risks to them. Space ain't friendly.

Beyond that I find it hard to care to drive anyone to work their ass off today for whatever humans are around 100+ years in the future. And, of course, more technological development brings more chance of mass self-inflicted die-off of humanity anyway. In 1900 it would've been much harder to kill 10%, 20%, 50%, 90% of the global population than it is today.

Everything is death eventually. And predicting the future is hard.