Remix.run Logo
▲ aennassiri 11 hours ago

I'm fed up with the regular euro bashing. People are underestimating what EU countries can do. The whole history was similar. France, for example, was neither the first to build high-end luxury products nor was it the first to embrace the Industrial Revolution. It managed to catch up in any case.

EU countries went from killing each other in two of the most deadly wars to having a union in 30 years.

I wish that the EU did the same as China did years ago, and that is to block any non-EU tech company from entering the market. We could have had the Google/Meta equivalent years ago.

▲KronisLV 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> I'm fed up with the regular euro bashing. People are underestimating what EU countries can do.

I'm from the EU and glad to be a part of it. I just wish it was easier to do multi-national projects (I think anything aerospace or military related shows how little the countries want to collaborate) or even just tackle large projects and undertakings better.

Hell, in regards to chips I'd be happy with at least 2020 level performance chips for servers, desktops and laptops, even ARM ones. Okay maybe that is aiming too high cause my current Ryzen 7 5800X is from 2020 and so is my M1 MacBook Air and I don't see the need to upgrade, even 2016 would be good enough. Just more domestic production, CPUs, GPUs, memory, storage, everything else.

▲SR2Z 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

China still does not have many companies on the level of American technology firms. Just restricting foreign competition in the domestic market is not enough for most places to compete; their domestic markets and investment levels are too underdeveloped to produce globally competitive companies.

The thing that produces competitive industries is requiring them to compete globally. That's how Chinese cars got good (Tesla joint venture -> independent Chinese Tesla -> competitive domestic companies).

There are two main reasons why the EU struggles to produce strong text companies are, IMO:

1. EU laws and regulations are very burdensome and cover everything from employees to packaging waste.

2. There is not enough capital that gets invested in EU tech companies to pay high tech salaries, again largely driven by more restrictive financial rules.

The result of these two is that European engineers tend to leave for the US, and European companies struggle to grow to American size.

Around 70% of American billionaires made their money themselves, while in the EU a similar share inherited it. Despite all the talk about social mobility in Europe being better than in the US, the truth is that the ultrawealthy in Europe have created a regulatory environment which makes it nearly impossible for real competition to exist.

▲mciancia 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> China still does not have many companies on the level of American technology firms

Maybe in terms of valuation. In terms of tech itself, I would say they are pretty close, few years behind maybe with gap closing

▲maxnevermind 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Just restricting foreign competition in the domestic market is not enough ...

Yes, It is not sufficient but I would argue it was necessary. In case of China it allowed them to have a set of domestic copycat companies like Baid, Alibaba and Tencent, that enabled high demand for local engineers to serve their needs and that allowed to have a large pool of competent domestic engineers which now can benefit other emerging sectors too. It keeps surprising how many top contributors to large OSS projects are from China.

▲aennassiri 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Interesting! I would split regulation in two different types though. The fist one is merely the output of bureaucracy and good intentions and a second that is targeting US tech companies as EU can't compete.

▲TMWNN 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>Around 70% of American billionaires made their money themselves, while in the EU a similar share inherited it.

The top 100 wealthiest Austrian families own two thirds of the country's wealth <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36755835>, and none of the wealth came from tech companies. The same is likely true of Germany with one exception: SAP.

Put another way, the two wealthiest German-born tech people (except the founders of SAP) are Peter Thiel and Andy Bechtolsheim, both of whom earned their billions in the US.

▲UncleOxidant 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> We could have had the Google/Meta equivalent years ago.

Which wouldn't do Europe a lot of good at this point. EU needs a TSMC and an Anthropic/OpenAI.

▲aennassiri 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes definitely, this is why I see the shift with AI as an opportunity to push forward new companies. EU needs to put the focus on hardware where it did have a competitive advantage few years ago (still have on B2B hardware)

▲ksec 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>EU countries went from killing each other in two of the most deadly wars to having a union in 30 years.

I guess you mean EEC in 1958, because EU was officially formed in 1993. And normally people would count the period of the two World War and starting to count by the end of it. Either way it is a lot more than 30 years.

▲aennassiri 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes indeed ! What is important is that the same people/generation who witnessed the atrocities of war and resented each other decided to create a union

▲malshe 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I wish that the EU did the same as China did years ago, and that is to block any non-EU tech company from entering the market. We could have had the Google/Meta equivalent years ago.

You can do it even today. But you can't bring back manufacturing from China. You gave them your techology and the market.

▲kylehotchkiss 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The euro bashing will stop when the pointing noses down at USA for being uncultured or unrefined or whatever stops.

▲aennassiri 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Totally aligned ! As a European, I was never into this US bashing. I looked up to the Americans in the same way the french did back in the 19th century when they gifted them statue of liberty

▲vlyan 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

times change. past greatness is not a reliable predictor for the future. Mongolia is rather unlikely to be the largest empire ever again, don't you think?

▲aennassiri 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Europe is still great.

▲vlyan 3 hours ago | parent [-]

its political stability and relative prosperity makes it an important consumer market, sure, but it's increasingly clear that Europe is no longer "great" great. its wealth was a product of being ahead of the rest of the world for a long time technologically and militarily, but the colonial era is over, so many others had caught up and are now eating their lunch. even the big three -- Germany, France, and Britain -- are in cultural, economic, and demographic decline. the alliance that binds them is loose and incoherent, promoting stagnation rather than innovation. the US brain drains its brightest while Europe itself frantically replaces its aging natives with whoever is willing to cross its undefended borders.

if the US or China had disappeared tomorrow, it would affect the rest of the world. what does an average person outside of Europe own that was made in Europe or couldn't be made in China instead? even ASML, its crown jewel, is built upon American tech and would be rebuilt in the US within a decade if there was necessity to do so.

▲gib444 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> We could have had the Google/Meta equivalent years ago.

I don't want the problems those kind of companies bring. The world would be better without Facebook and Instagram in particular.

▲mciancia 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> The world would be better without Facebook and Instagram in particular.

Maybe, but it's also better to have our own alternatives for those than to rely in so many cases on US tech only

▲aennassiri 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You remind me of a new research article on how dumb the new social media make us

▲ralusek 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

But Europeans still just use Facebook and Instagram...

▲mitxela 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Agreed. Someone has to actually do it though. Talk is cheap.

▲aennassiri 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Living in France, trying to do my part here. I love the US as well and their spirit of freedom and innovation should be an example to follow

▲mitxela 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Cool. What's your semiconductor project? Have you put something in Tiny Tapeout, or made a garage transistor?

▲roenxi 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> EU countries went from killing each other in two of the most deadly wars to having a union in 30 years.

Was that the halcyon period where they were too broken to fight back and got the continent split between the Americans and the Communists? Or the modern period where it turns out the security situation in Europe was so totally mishandled that we ended up with the Ukraine war?

The spectre of nukes getting used isn't dropping over time and this sort of grinding destructive war is probably raising the risk of a big conflagration. Everyone seems to be rearming.

▲aniviacat 9 hours ago | parent [-]

> Or the modern period where it turns out the security situation in Europe was so totally mishandled that we ended up with the Ukraine war?

What do you mean by this? Ukraine is not part of the EU.

▲roenxi 23 minutes ago | parent [-]

I mean the EU got its diplomacy so badly wrong that it sparked one of the deadliest wars this century in Europe and the EU countries appear to be rearming in preparation for the state of war spreading. The EU seem to be in the process of destabilising the state that controls the largest cache of nuclear weapons in existence.

The project has not scored well on matters of war and peace. And there is still a far too likely possibility here that after re-arming and in an era of war the Europeans fall back to their old tricks and descend into a state of war against each other again, given that the adults keeping them peaceful seem to have left the building.

▲KetoManx64 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

▲nearlyepic 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Least racist European

▲Rumple22Stilk 11 hours ago | parent [-]

This is not remotely racist. It's simply a fact, and the result of a lack of nationalist ideology.

Turns out if it's more economically efficient to simply import skilled workers, or outsource, then that's what will happen. Breeding and educating your own citizens in a first world country is very expensive. So you don't do it.

The only reason not to do this is national preference. Economically it makes sense, on a national level it makes sense, individually it's genocide.

▲bigyabai 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Individually, you have to accept migrants if your personal demographic is below the replacement rate. Otherwise you will never retire, and your kids (if any) will work in a nursing economy at minimum wage.

It's petty and anti-nationalist to demand that your nation destroy it's own economy to fit your arbitrary political mold.

▲Geee an hour ago | parent | next [-]

We've now learned that this isn't true for all migrant groups, and it has been an extremely costly mistake to make. Demographic replacement can't work positively if the productivity of migrants is below of the original demographic, and actually makes the situation worse. Europe might have learned this too late, but at least now EU and most European countries are changing course.

▲andsoitis 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Individually, you have to accept migrants if your personal demographic is below the replacement rate.

No, you don't have to.

▲bigyabai 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, you do. The frontlines of Ukraine are being prepared for literal demographic replacement as we speak. Kidnapped Ukrainian children are attending Russian schools, fortifications and bases are being dug out for them to fight against their own kin.

Are you enlisted? Do you want to be? Europe needed to figure out it's defense plan yesterday, not in 20 years. If Europe won't ally with migrants, then maintaining European sovereignty is nearly impossible.

▲Rumple22Stilk 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This is an absurd set of assumptions that have forced you into a nonsensical position.

No, you don't need to accept migrants. You need money. You can get money in many many ways.

The best way for this to happen for the general prosperity of citizens is for the state to enrich themselves from the work of others, non citizens, and give that money to citizens. This is what Norway has done through its sovereign wealth fund.

▲bigyabai 9 hours ago | parent [-]

It's absolutely not an absurd set of assumptions. The majority of the demographics you're worried about are beneath the replacement rate. They are going to necessarily reach a point where the youth workforce cannot sustain the outsized elderly population or protect them in a war scenario.

If you do not want to defend Europe's front lines with teenage conscripts and geriatric riflemen, you need a way to bring warm bodies into the fold. Refusing lawful immigration will undermine domestic security, doom the elderly and ruin pension funds for future retirees. No sovereign wealth fund is worth losing your sovereignty over.

▲Rumple22Stilk 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, they are an absurd set of assumptions.

I told you what the requirement was. Money. You have simply arbitrarily decided instead it's just people for no reason at all. As though magically people will spawn resources from their finger tips. According to you the richest countries in the world must be the most populous.

Obviously this is idiotic to even a cursory examination.

The next assumption you've made is that birth rate is completely random, a roll of the dice, an unchangeable fact of the universe. The reality is of course it's a result of policy and economics. This can be solved extremely easily.

▲bigyabai 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm sorry. You cannot accuse me of setting absurd assumptions and then outline "the requirement" as if reality is Go Fish and I misplayed my card. Macropolitics are multidimensional, the babies born tomorrow are eighteen years away from reaching the workforce. There are no policy or economic changes that make your children grow faster.

Europe's troop deficit is just as immediate and pressing as the economic and policy problems. It would be nice if we could ignore it, but you can only expand your domestic middle class if you don't condemn them to the conscription lines first.

▲Rumple22Stilk 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It's very funny you try to make that argument when your requirement was literally just MIGRANTS, because MIGRANTS = PENSIONS. Which is hilariously a subset of my own requirement, more specific. Absolutely absurd.

No. What I said is just a fact. There's no assumption, the requirement is a fact. You need money to pay for goods and services for the people no longer working.

There's no assumption there? What's the assumption, that goods and services need to be paid for?

So stop bringing up migrants for no reason at all. The actual issue is money, and there are many ways to obtain money.

The nonsense about troops is of course ridiculous. Just a fantastical statement divorced from reality. Who is this enemy Europe is facing that will require a ww1 style meat grinder of 10s of millions of troops, which of course took place when the european population was half the size.

▲52khz 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲ 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]