| ▲ | apt-get 4 hours ago |
| Just days after a similar (criminal) incident causing a train to derail in France: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2026/09/12/french-p... "close to Renault's factory in the town of Cléon", which is now preparing to start manufacturing drones for the French military, in collaboration with Ukrainian military-industrial groups. |
|
| ▲ | peri-cl 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I don't think they look similar, the synchronicity notwithstanding. The sabotage in France was a 250–300 kg rail fragment (per your link). The objects in the Netherlands look much smaller, and look like they're intended to short-circuit two rails to trigger a signal fault. In one place they found car jumper cables with clamps attached to both rails, https://nos.nl/video/2631081-startkabels-van-spoor-bij-meppe... ("Startkabels van spoor bij Meppel weggehaald") |
| |
| ▲ | apt-get 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not asserting this is definitely a Russian op (given the amount of simultaneous farmers' protests and all in NL today), but their modus operandi for foreign operations of this kind involves paying random thugs a few hundred to a couple thousand euros to carry out acts of sabotage using whatever items they have on hand. The items don't need to match, the people involved don't need to know each other. | | |
| ▲ | edouard-harris an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Correct, this is their exact MO and has been for decades. "Random thug" recruitment notwithstanding, part of the point of such ops is to prove to themselves that they can, in fact, reach out and touch a target - i.e., exercising the entire operational chain from C&C down to the minutiae of execution. A kind of integration test for sabotage, if you will. (Not saying this specific incident is or isn't anything in particular, just commenting on the general MO.) If one were in a charitable mood, one could think of this as a "just in case" measure of ongoing capability assurance in the event of a broader conflict. In a less charitable mood, one might imagine it as preparation for proactive action. In either case, if you don't do this kind of sub-threshold stuff at least occasionally, you often discover that when a real conflict erupts, the capabilities you thought you had are in fact literally or figuratively rusty. (See the Russian army's logistical debacle early in the Ukraine war for a recent example.) Most top tier nation states do some version of this; each one has its own style. The Russians are somewhat unusual in that they care less than most who knows or suspects them of this kind of activity. | |
| ▲ | sandos 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Exactly this, and also they are trying to keep some deniability here, so variations are good. | | |
| ▲ | hgomersall 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why would you want to keep it deniable? What's the point in this sort of sabotage if nobody knows you did it? | | |
| ▲ | vlovich123 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | This isn’t a show of power. Sabotage works best when your target doesn’t even realize it was sabotage. Similarly it’s best if you misattribute blame because then you’re fighting the wrong party and looking for ghosts. Russia throwing journalists out of windows or paining with Novachok - that’s a “it’s us, you can’t do anything about it, don’t fuck with us” power signal that benefits from “plausible” deniability - you can’t prove it was us. | |
| ▲ | DrScientist 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The ideal scenario is everyone suspects it's you but can't prove it. You have both the desired threat, but no concrete biases for an official response. Also an uncertainty limits action - it might be a random event, it could even be a false flag. One of the problem's here is narratives are being spun by multiple actors and it depends on who you believe. | | |
| ▲ | chmod775 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | You don't need a real basis for a response. There's nobody here enforcing any rules. If you wanted you could claim you have evidence, without having any. Doesn't matter. "This better stop or there will be sanctions, and if its not within your power to stop it, tough luck" is a valid response. Whether that's wise is another question. | |
| ▲ | hgomersall 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Right, but you absolutely need the suspicion. If it's too deniable, it rather loses efficacy. It seems in this situation it could be any number of actors, which rather dilutes any intended message. | |
| ▲ | spwa4 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > The ideal scenario is everyone suspects it's you but can't prove it. Why? EU countries have shown time and time again they won't do anything. I mean for God's sake, Russia was caught sending THREE remote controlled flying bomb on a German airfield, with another one found by a passerby before it was launched. They contained professionally made Russian explosives. There is no doubt who did it. This was not the first, or the 10th time they got caught. I mean Russia murdered someone in the UK with polonium, for God's sake. The idea that the Kremlin is worried in the slightest that you can prove it's them is absurd. They leave their fingerprints knowing there will be no reaction. | | |
| ▲ | brookst an hour ago | parent [-] | | Because being too blatant will galvanize the public and create support for open war. The goal is to ensure all reasonable people know, while keeping enough deniability that Russian-funded right-wing groups can sow doubt about attribution and response policy’s They don’t care whether it can be proven in court or by people paying close attention. They care whether it can’t be denied even by their aligned agents in western countries. |
|
| |
| ▲ | hnlmorg 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because otherwise it would be an act of war. At which point they might as well have just fired a rocket into the country. | |
| ▲ | vintermann 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If the main point is slowing/frustrating drone production? It would honestly be kind of fair game to sabotage production of drones that would be used against you, even if they're made in a country you're not at war with --- if it wasn't for Russia having a lot of responsibility for that war in the first place (to put it mildly). | | |
| ▲ | vincnetas an hour ago | parent [-] | | what do you mean "fair game"? by the same logic russia attacking ukraine is also "fair game". "hei cmon im just atacking my neighbor its fair game, what else should i do" | | |
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | vintermann an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I mean what I said: if you're being attacked by drones, then no one can fault you for trying to sabotage the production of those drones, even if they're made in a different country than the one which is sending them against you. But, you can and should fault Russia for getting into that position in the first place, that their neighbor is attacking them back with drones. | | |
| ▲ | vincnetas an hour ago | parent [-] | | but why are you attacked by drones thats the million dollar question... |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | grim_io 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Russia is trying to avoid retaliation through stricter sanctions, for example. | |
| ▲ | ChrisMarshallNY 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They seem to be very good at "mob tactics." No one can prove anything, for example, but anyone knows that people that piss Putin off, need to stay away from windows in high places. | | |
| ▲ | vlovich123 a minute ago | parent | next [-] | | That’s because the distinction between the Russian mob and the government is nonexistent | |
| ▲ | nico_h 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The windows are entirely blameless. If a window gets near you, it’s already too late, you’re now just a message “pour encourager les autres”. |
| |
| ▲ | the_mitsuhiko 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Doubt is always good. |
|
| |
| ▲ | nahgF 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | To achieve what exactly? All the Russians would get from this is BBC warmongering articles and increased resolve of EU politicians. The latter is desired by Ukraine and by the US, which wants more proxies against Russia. The only known operation was the Nord Stream sabotage done by Ukraine. I have enough of this. If the US is so desperate to weaken Russia, please attack through the Bering Strait and leave the EU alone. | |
| ▲ | kakacik 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There was recently this german lady reporter who posed as actively pro-Putin for few months and it didn't take long for fsb/gru to come to her online. It started small, just check this or that, little favor there but soon escalated to proper spycraft. Some other folks reported having death threats against family. Its for peanuts, few hundred euros mostly. They just need to find the dumbest and most desperate folks to commit acts of treason. | | |
| ▲ | somenameforme an hour ago | parent [-] | | The chances of this being real are basically zero, or Russia would be getting double agented, and reverse intelling themselves, out the arse. Instead all we get are attempts to connect random events, of which there are endless viable suspects, to Russia. It's fair to say that if one jumps in the middle of a fight, they should expect to get punched, but it's also fair to say that for now Russia has been avoiding throwing much in the way of punches. |
| |
| ▲ | tyrabound 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's odd that you would jump to "Russian op" and hedging by _not_ asserting that it is "definitely" one; but it very well could also be and arguably even is far more likely an act by someone who would benefit form scaring the public and manipulating the affected governments. I'm not going to assert at all, one way or another who it may be because it could be several actors with interests in producing outcomes of fear among the public and animating and manipulating the respective governments and the clowns in the EU to take actions without thinking. It is really a rather common playbook of stoking fear and even instigating war not for direct outcomes that has been used innumerable times over history. Only it seems that the majority of people are incapable of seeing, accepting, or maybe just internalizing when they are being played, lied to, and manipulated for the benefit of others at their own expense. One thing that logic would dictate though is that Russia would be extremely low on the list of suspects since they gain nothing by some minor event like this, are negatively affected in every manner possible by being in any way behind such actions, and they could simply just send barrages of missiles to hit actually meaningful targets if they ever become sick and tired of all the CIA/MI6 clowns thinking they can salami slice their way into conquering Russia and once the Germans and Poles have been whipped up to be the battering ram of minced meat again. It's why we have so many catastrophic and calamitous events in our history because people never ask themselves who may be benefitting from the act that is immediately used to manipulate people through fear. In spite of having been told and explained a long time ago and many times since, you should always ask you who benefits, cui bono. Russia does not benefit from scaring the populace into supporting the murderous and war mongering governments and the maniacal ruling parasites that control them in order to profit from war as they send your children in to the meat grinder. | | |
| ▲ | apt-get 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > One thing that logic would dictate though is that Russia would be extremely low on the list of suspects since they gain nothing and are negatively affected in every manner possible by being in any way behind such actions. Or one could choose not to take this in isolation from all the acts of brazen and identified sabotage Russia does, slashing deep-sea cables in international waters with their shadow fleets, organizing psyop campaigns throughout the entire continent that can be traced back right to their government units, and so on :-) | | | |
| ▲ | Muromec 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | \One thing that logic would dictate though is that Russia would be extremely low on the list of suspects since they gain nothing and are negatively affected in every manner possible by being in any way behind such actions. They are known for actions that negatively affect them and everyone around. That's kinda their whole thing. | | |
| ▲ | smallstepforman 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | [Quote] They are known for actions that negatively affect them and everyone around. That's kinda their whole thing. [/quote] You honestly cannot be that gullible? |
| |
| ▲ | lioeters 34 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | The ruling class in Europe needs this war for economic reasons. They're orchestrating and selling it to the public by constant fear mongering and provoking conflict. Even in a relatively intelligent crowd like this forum, people are gullible and easily guided to hate the Other: red ("communists", Russia, China); brown (immigrants, Muslims, Iran); or green ("far left", environmental and civil rights activists). They hate us for our freedoms! Be afraid, people, and keep funnelling billions of your tax money into the pockets of the rich who profit from literal conspiracy and mass murder. No wonder we have endless conflict and fascism on the rise around the world. There's so much money to be made from war and hate, defrauding the public for generations. How can we not see it, it's the same playbook again and again. One day we will have to face the true evil, the traitors of humanity, the enemy within. | | |
| ▲ | aldous 15 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The last thing ‘the ruling class in Europe needs’ is a pan European war! Stability and the system that stability enables is what has put them into positions of power and prosperity in the first place. They actively don’t want outright war and Russia knows this, which is why Russia continually provokes and gets away with acts of sabotage. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | fakedang 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sabotage is sabotage, doesn't have to be the same down to the minutae to be called similar. |
|
|
| ▲ | Someone 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Just days after a similar (criminal) incident causing a train to derail in France From what I read, the similarity ends in “both involved trains”. This chain of attacks seems to have used short metal pipes (“Footage published by Dutch public broadcaster NOS on Tuesday showed police carrying what appeared to be metal pipes - about 1.5 metres (5ft) long”) to short a connection, making safety systems signal “there’s a train there”, stopping trains further up the track. The France incident involved a piece of rails heavy enough to cause derailment (“The rail fragment was estimated to weigh between 250 and 300 kilograms”) My money is on this being a rogue farmers protest. |
| |
| ▲ | glenstein 6 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | The similarity is also timing and geopolitical context. It doesn't have to be an identical method to merit the comparison as the means for sabotage can be variable. Of course more similarity would be a stronger signal, but we shouldn't miss the forest (rail sabotage) for the trees (shorted circuit). | |
| ▲ | rwyinuse 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Could be also rogue farmers paid by Russia. Easiest way for Russia to cause havoc in Europe is through exploiting existing political issues. | | |
| ▲ | ajsnigrutin 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The easiest way to hide the incompetence of local european politics, be it expensive diesel or the upcoming economic prices is to blame it all on russia. Volkswagen is laying off 100k of workers, because they can't make cars people can afford anymore... blame russia! Germans fed up with merz and vote afd? Russia! Macron doesn't even have 20% of support in polls anymore? Russia! Stub your pinky on the corner of the bed? russia! | | |
| ▲ | galangalalgol 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It seems unlikely they would let any political divisions or legitimate grievances go unexploited. It is their cultural core competency for centuries. That does not mean the greivances being exploited aren't valid, or that the parties themselves don't aid in the fracture so they don't have to worry about competition with parties whose ideology is too close to theirs. Edit: This is reductive, Russia has tons of culture besides this trait, but it is the fundamental strategy that allowed a landlocked state with no natural borders to survive and expand. When you learn a strategy to survive or cope with adversity, it sticks long after it is beneficial. | | |
| ▲ | ajsnigrutin 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | But all those political divisions are a result of national politics of those countries. People want higher wages, less taxes, affordable housing, more recently cheaper gas/diesel, and in the last decade (or more in some places), less foreign migrants. If no other political party will do anything about that, people are forced to vote for Alternatives (intentionally capitalized). Especially after all the anti-russian propaganda being false ("three days of rockets left", etc.), after double standards ("ukraine is being attacked, we must help them!", vs "israel is commiting a genocide, we must continue selling them weapons", and "iran was attacked by our buddies, let's send nato (uk, etc) planes to shoot down their counterattacks"). Americans started a war that hurts us every time we go to a gas station and no politician even points a finger at them, no sanctions, no nothing. It's not russia exploiting the divisions, it's the eu governments being incompetent to the levels never seen before, be it local national governments or EU levels (eg. 3eur customs on everything from china, chat control, etc.). Look at this for example: https://cbnunfiltered.com/macrons-approval-rating-falls-to-h... macron has 16% approval rating, while 81% see him "unfavorably"... how shitty of a politician do you have to be to not step down when 81% of the country hates you? If the governments listened to what people wanted and did at least something in that direction (again, top paragraph), people would not be looking for Alternatives (again, intentionally capitalized). Since they don't the Alternatives are the only thing left. | | |
| ▲ | rwyinuse 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | The way I see it, both things are true - European politicians and major parties have stirred anger by their incompetence, AND Russia has exploited this anger for their own purposes. EU has huge flaws, but it's still better than Russia. Germans, French and the British may not understand it, but us unfortunate enough to live next to Russia do. There is a reason why Poland, Baltic countries and now even Finland and Sweden joined NATO. Russia is ruled by evil, murderous tyrants (as is always has been), while EU elite is merely lazy, greedy and incompetent. I'll choose pro-EU parties over pro-Russian parties as long as EU is not bombing children's hospitals and massacring civilians. I can only hope citizens of other countries do the same, or otherwise there's a pretty good possibility my country will face what Ukraine has suffered. | |
| ▲ | glenstein 3 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is a completely all over the place gish gallop. Both can be true: there's real reporting on acts of sabotage that aren't made up, and there are domestic tensions happening independently of that. The skill is keeping both things in your mind at the same time. | |
| ▲ | koonsolo 4 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > But all those political divisions are a result of national politics of those countries. Do you claim that Russia doesn't invest in disinformation campaigns against the West? | |
| ▲ | IAmBroom an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | All that's being said is, "Russia is known to exploit political conflicts to harm their enemies". WHY those conflicts exist is irrelevant. No one is saying it absolutely, unquestionably was Russian interference. Just that it could be. EDIT: OK, at least one person is saying that. But most people are likely thinking, "Well, could be, might not be... dunno." |
|
| |
| ▲ | nmeofthestate 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Explosive-equipped drone attack on airport - Russia! Numerous arson attacks on businesses supplying Ukraine - Russia! Country invaded, cities destroyed, tens of thousands of civilians killed, raped, tortured - Russia. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | contravariant 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As far as sabotage goes doing it in a way that is disruptive but causes no permanent damage is a bit odd. As a protest, however, it makes perfect sense. | |
| ▲ | Zealotux 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >My money is on this being a rogue farmers protest. I'm French and I heard nothing of the sort, what makes you think of that? | | | |
| ▲ | Telemakhos 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm surprised people jump to Russia instead of the radical left. Left-wing environmentalist terrorists attached shunts to rail lines to short out the safety signals back in 2020 in the US [0]. Vulkangruppe has been conducting sabotage in Germany, and a 48-year-old named Daniel V was arrested on suspicion of sabotaging Germany's electrical grid because he hated fossil fuels [1]. The French had left-wing environmentalist terrorists sabotaging the rail network in 2024 [2]. The left has been conducting infrastructure attacks all over Europe this decade, but it's probably more politically expedient to blame Russia. [0] https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdwa/pr/pair-charged-interferin...
[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy5zw56lnx3o
[2] https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-leaning-towards-... | | |
| ▲ | microtonal an hour ago | parent [-] | | Several reasons: - Extinction Rebellion and other environmental groups always claim the action pretty quickly and openly in NL. - If you look at the locations of sabotage, it’s all close to the ‘farmer heartland’. Most left-wing and environmental groups would do it in the randstad. Most likely it’s farmers. They announced very heavy protests today and also burnt hay near highways to create smoke clouds. Possibly nudged by Russian operatives because the like to sow dissent. But we’ll see. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | walrus01 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Most consumers know Renault as an ordinary car manufacturer but also worth mentioning it's a major manufacturer of armored vehicles for the French armed forces. |
|
| ▲ | puttycat 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yes. And in combination it completely rules out the suggestion that the Netherlands attack is some kind of local activist protest. (The France attack resulted in several grave injuries and could have just as easily resulted in dozens of deaths.) |
| |
|
| ▲ | aaron695 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | paganel 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| "Live by the sword, die by the sword", meaning that the Western-European military alliance should also become aware of the consequences of being involved in a war against Russia, there's no hiding behind the bush anymore since they've started doing that. And before anyone starts crying: "These are civilian targets!", which would be true, I'd remind them that the Wildberries logistics centers in Russia were also civilian targets. |
| |
| ▲ | HarHarVeryFunny an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > the Wildberries logistics centers in Russia were also civilian targets They've now hidden the label, but Wildberries carry almost a 1/4 million items tagged "Everything for the SMO" ("special military operation"), so hardly a civilian target. Ukraine has been highly disciplined in going after military targets, other than energy, which of course also feeds the Russian war machine. There is a big difference between starting fires in a warehouse which gives most people a chance to escape, and being like the Russians who were murdering and raping civilians in Dobas etc, firing missiles non-stop into civilian areas of Kyiv. | |
| ▲ | pjc50 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Really Western Europe has been ignoring Russia's war for far too long; the MH17 shootdown was in 2014 and the situation has only deteriorated since then. | | |
| ▲ | DrScientist 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not sure how MH17 shooting is relevant here. While the consensus is that it's likely a Russia controlled/allied battery shot it down - I'm not sure anybody thinks it was anything other than an accident, not an intentional act of sabotage. |
| |
| ▲ | bluGill 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You cannot ignore war - Ukraine found that out the hard way. Just because you want to be peaceful doesn't mean everybody else does and you cannot stop them from attacking by being peaceful. | |
| ▲ | ithkuil an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There are certainly consequences in participating in a war against Russia. There are also consequences in letting Russia take Ukraine militarily. Whatever you think about the motivations and the desired end goal, actions and lack of actions both have consequences | |
| ▲ | greenleafone7 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Hay here it is: The idiot of the day award. Go move to russia. Hopefully we will send back their millions of "proud" migrants that are swarming Europe still. | |
| ▲ | rob74 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Civilian targets heavily involved in handling "dual-use" items that the Russian army isn't providing to its soldiers, so they have to buy it by themselves (https://factually.co/fact-checks/business/wildberries-milita...). ...this after Russia has been targeting civilian targets in Ukraine from the first days of the invasion. | |
| ▲ | Citizen_Lame 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Those were downed by Ukraine. Not, that facts matter to Russian bot. Well done comrade. | | |
| ▲ | paganel an hour ago | parent [-] | | > comrade My grandfather was a Communist Party member, as was my dad, unfortunately I ended up living in this neo-liberal hell. Which is to say that I had sincerely wished to be a "tovarăș", but those days are by now long behind me. |
| |
| ▲ | pestatije 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | its been mentioned ad-nauseam that wildberries also sells to the military... where have you been hiding? | | |
| ▲ | paganel 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > also sells to the military... where have you been hiding? And the Western-built railway system has been used for war/military reasons since its very inception (almost), it's how Prussia got the best over the Habsburgs at Sadowa in the 1860s. One could also say that Tsarist Russia not yet having a rail connection to Crimea just before that caused them to be defeated against the Western incursion at Sevastopol. |
| |
| ▲ | kakacik 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | russia declared war on whole west (including this open forum) in 2014, if you cared about the topic a bit you would know that. They are not even hiding it, quite contrary. Attacks keep happening basically daily in entire Europe now, thats a text book declaration of war from russia. They repeatedly declared razing whole western Europe and western world with nuclear weapons, annihilating hundreds of millions. They repeatedly stated their goal is to at least restore former USSR with eastern bloc acting as a shield/nuclear battlefield at all costs, same as it was during cold war. Then they started their military push, and if Ukraine didn't fight back with everything they had they may have stopped only at Austria/German eastern border (probably West Germany one). But you should know all this mister troll, don't you. I don't mind, repeating (sad) facts about russia can be a hobby and internet should be full of it. | | |
| ▲ | smallstepforman 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | [quote]Russia declared war on whole west (including this open forum) in 2014[/quote] I dont remember seeing Lavrov delivering a declaration of war to this “whole west” diplomatic core. Got any real sources to back this absurd claim? | | |
| ▲ | vincnetas an hour ago | parent [-] | | russia never formally declares war. you can check the history and correct me on this if you can. nevertheless russia has repeatedly threatened to nuke europe. |
|
| |
| ▲ | happosai 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Of course, the only reason wild berries got hit is because Putin started the war. The only reason why why Russians (and Russian speaking Ukrainians) are dying in large numbers is Putin. The pro-russian historic fanfiction asserts that "Putin was forced to war or NATO would have expanded to ukraine or something" There is no conceivable scenario where Russians would have worse safety than what Putin's decision caused. Heck, the long range drones attacking Russia today would simple not exist. People say trump is Putin's stooge, but honestly Putin looks like a western plant. Nobody else since Stalin has killed as many Russians than Putin. | |
| ▲ | petesergeant 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Russia's biggest asset is general apathy in the rich West. People with names written in funny script that sound like Bond characters shooting at each other a thousand kilometers away is hard to get Peter and Paddy and Pierre and Pontus and Pablo living comfortable lives with comfortable jobs to give a shit about. There's a reason Western governments make sure the media prints stories about intercepting Russian jets. Bringing the war to them and getting the public to want their government to commit blood and treasure to doing something about it is a ferociously poor strategic decision from the Kremlin. "That Putin killed a 17 year old French girl on her way to school on the train" is unlikely to cause the public in the West to back down. | | |
| ▲ | libertine 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't think that funding far right parties, neo nazi groups, threatening with nuclear holocaust, sending drones into neighbors, occupying neighbors territories, etc is aimed at the "goal of bringing apathy to Western Europeans." But somehow you're trying to spin it into it's Western governments are the ones wanting to bring war? You know, the guys that had a huge part of their economy on top of Russian gas? The guys that closed their eyes when part of Georgia was occupied? Or ignored Crimea occupation? Those people are the ones who watched Russia kill 200 people in the flight MH17 without consequences. That's cultivating apathy? |
|
|