| ▲ | Google has abandoned Google News(elgan.com) |
| 183 points by mikelgan an hour ago | 110 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | slg an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| I really can't get over the way almost every piece of consumer technology/software has gotten worse in the last half decade. These companies are killing every goose they can get their hands on because they are so convinced there is some golden goose out there that will be worth more than all those regular geese combined. |
| |
| ▲ | Bolwin 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | It feels like that should be a golden opportunity for competitors, but every time a competitor makes a decent replacement, the big tech company either buys it or briefly invests in their product again to make it good enough and since they have a long tail of users and the network effect, they win by default while still keeping their product mediocre | | |
| ▲ | palata a minute ago | parent | next [-] | | The joys of monopolies, I guess. I think that the only solution is to break them, and that goes through regulations. | |
| ▲ | toomuchtodo 9 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The solution is non profits or open protocols. Internet Archive. Let’s Encrypt. Signal. AT Proto. (not an exhaustive list) Competition is not the way out, but building public goods through corporate entity structures that are protected from the usual capitalist forms of acquisition (B Corps are not required to maximize value, non profits can be made almost impossible to acquire). In other words, don’t build another car company, build a mass transit system, build the library, build the park. A great recent example was Mitchell pushing Ghostty into a non profit before using it as a component for a venture startup (Superlogical). https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49100329 > We will build on libghostty exactly as it was designed to be used: as a public building block for terminal applications. Superlogical will consume the same MIT-licensed components available to everyone else, and we will continue to upstream shared terminal work so every libghostty consumer can benefit. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48738228 (Our collective defense against people building moats to capture economic gains through the control of data or capabilities is to make it impossible to build the moat, and it’s never been cheaper to do so with LLMs, “computah make it so”) | | |
| ▲ | righthand a few seconds ago | parent [-] | | Non-profits and open protocols dont do jack squat when capitalists surround those things. See: Mozilla Firefox and WHATWG The latter particularly being membered by all the big corpos and introducing, controlling, and deprecating standards as they see fit. |
| |
| ▲ | shevy-java 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I thought so too, but they suck as well. It's really strange. I wonder if we can re-design the www stack. Keep what is working, discard the rest, but design it correctly up-front, so that e. g. Google or others can not ruin it anymore. The 1990s were better in this regard IMO. | |
| ▲ | RicoElectrico 26 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | One of the only actual levers in society is interest rates and let me tell you, the current state does not favor those who just want to have a sustainable business. |
| |
| ▲ | dgellow an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | have you seen Masayoshi Son goose presentation? https://group.softbank/media/Project/sbg/sbg/pdf/ir/investor... page 44 I think you're onto something edit: replaced the link to point to the actual slides, it's worth checking the actual source, there is some hilarious details there! (spoiler: "The true source of value. Golden egg factory inside the goose") | | |
| ▲ | slg 35 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I hadn't seen that. Just a hunch, but it's probably a red flag when someone starts comparing themselves to non-existent mythical beings. | | | |
| ▲ | KaiMagnus 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What a fever dream of a presentation, but I bet it was effective. | |
| ▲ | financetechbro 24 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I’ve put together many investor presentations throughout my time and seeing the stuff that SoftBank gets away with is honestly insane. My bonus would’ve been at jeopardy if I would’ve presented slides like that to my senior bankers. |
| |
| ▲ | giancarlostoro 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Arguably a little longer, its just compounded, Windows peaked at 8 and 10 was downhill spiral, 11 is just all the bad stuff that 10 had available out of the box. | | | |
| ▲ | wonnage an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Software stopped improving in 2016 and now AI is here to accelerate the downfall | | |
| ▲ | rpdillon 32 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It's weirdly kinda true...at least in games, my kids and I noticed that there were a bonkers number of great games in 2016 in particular, but also kind of around that period (2018 had some greats as well). Sure, there are some standouts in recent years here and there, but it seems like the overall trend is downward. Was kind of excited to see Crate Entertainment release a new DLC for Grim Dawn this past week, given that's a game from 2016. Love the approach of adding more content to something known to be good. | | |
| ▲ | teamonkey 14 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The current trend is saturation. The current rate is over 4000 new games a month on Steam. The problem isn’t that great new games aren’t being released, it’s finding them. |
|
| |
| ▲ | 3uler 33 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Half decade? Its been getting worse for as long as I’ve been conscious. | | |
| ▲ | dd8601fn 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Eh. I understand the vibe, but so many millions of things have gotten so, so much better in my lifetime. We could spend all day trying to list them, if we tried. | |
| ▲ | rexreed 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The tipping point from steady improvement to steady enshittification is just post the 2008 recession. As soon as the financial incentives were put in for growth (2009+) the trend shifted hard to value extraction from a captive audience. | |
| ▲ | tpm 25 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | how old are you? smartphones are strictly better than no smartphones or no mobile phones. internet is better than no internet. etc. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dividefuel 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Small clarification: the post's screenshot is of the News mode in Search, and not news.google.com. I think the latter is what people think of when they think "Google News". Whether the same problems are there as well, I don't know. I also notice in the screenshot that the query isn't visible, it's on page 4 of results, and there seems to be a banner saying that the search is expanding beyond the set filters. I agree it certainly shouldn't ignore the date filter, but otherwise depending on the query we might already have exhausted useful results by page 4. |
| |
| ▲ | jubilanti 14 minutes ago | parent [-] | | What a joke of a journalist. I'm all for shitting over Google, but have some competence and integrity! This has a captivating headline and we've all seen the depredations in Google and elsewhere, but this is journalistic malpractice. It's not Google News, Search tells you when it is abandoning your filters because you keep infinite paginating, he intentionally cropped the screenshot as much as he could to make it as sensational as possible. Mr. Elgan, you say this is in the "huge majority" of the time. I demand receipts. Show me just one more example, uncropped, with the full URL. |
|
|
| ▲ | driverdan 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What's with big tech companies changing all searches to be fuzzy? FB Marketplace is now like this too. It's impossible to search for anything, it gives unrelated results at least half the time. |
| |
| ▲ | creamynebula 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | If you have to search several times you see more ads. (I know you probably have adblocker tho) | |
| ▲ | felooboolooomba 21 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Desparation. Desparation to get more clicks to get more ad revenue. Those who lived to see the rise and fall of Excite and AltaVista search engines know it's exactly the same thing happening. Even Google search is spewing out hot garbage a lot of the time. Prabhakar Raghavan's internal sabotage of the engine that started 2019 never seemed to have stopped, it just got worse. |
|
|
| ▲ | mikelgan an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Now, when I do my traditional searches, a huge majority of some of my searches are from Instagram or other social media sites, not news publishing sites. Many of my results are in foreign languages I cannot even identify. Many of my results are published in foreign countries, not the U.S. as I specified. Now, the most recent failure is that when I specify news published in, say, the past week, it just ignores that setting and gives me news published weeks, months or years in the past. Google has abandoned Google News and let it crash into the dock. |
| |
| ▲ | jubilanti an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I've tried repeatedly and I cannot replicate any of your results. No matter what I search for, the date filter works. What were you searching for? Please share your full queries and have screenshots that capture the URL as well. edit: You also say this occurs in the "huge majority" of the times you search. You give one cropped screenshot that does not even show your own query. As a journalist, please specify whether you intended for "huge majority" to be taken literally or figuratively. How many searches have you run and how many have one of these bugs? | | |
| ▲ | BYazfVCcq an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | >No matter what I search for, the date filter works. Can you search for Ceuta and find some articles from 2021? There was a similar incident to the current one in 2021, but searching for it seems to be impossible for me. | | | |
| ▲ | dgellow an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | google results haven't been deterministic since pretty much forever now, even if you had the exact URL, exact geographic location, a user profile with the same history, it's not guaranteed you will be able to replicate | | |
| ▲ | jubilanti an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I don't mean replicating the exact order of results, I mean I cannot replicate any of the alleged bugs. When you're reporting bugs and especially when you're making such a strongly-worded claim, it's best practice to be as detailed as possible. The claim is "a huge majority" of queries are fundamentally breaking logical operators. My point is that if you're reporting a bug you claim is so systemic it has made the product useles, sharing just one cropped screenshot with zero details about the actual query isn't very helpful. | | |
| ▲ | dgellow 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I get your point but I don't think they are reporting a bug. It looks more like venting about the frustration | | |
| ▲ | jubilanti 9 minutes ago | parent [-] | | They claim to be a freaking journalist. I expect better. I want to support journalists, but when they manipulate like this to serve an agenda they know their readers want, they're no better than the tech companies. This wasn't on Google News, it was on Google Search, it was on page 4 of the results, and they cropped out the notification that appears when you paginate past the original filtered results saying that the filters are being dropped to serve you more of the content you are explicitly demanding. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Marsymars an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Heck my Google News doesn't even have a tools dropdown or a date filter. |
|
| |
| ▲ | oh_my_goodness an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Kagi search works much better than Google search for me. But I don't use it for news, so I dunno. I have nothing to do with Kagi. I've been a user for a few months. |
|
|
| ▲ | aqme28 38 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I agree with their point but I really don’t get this metaphor. |
| |
| ▲ | slg 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | A person defined by their lack of intelligence sees something exciting off in the distance and makes a rash decision to rush towards it, thereby abandoning something that was making them money (not sure how much that part specifically applies to Google News), ultimately leading to lots of unnecessary destruction. | |
| ▲ | invalidator 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Google/Forrest rushed to embrace AI/Dan, and completely forgot about News/boat, which kept chugging along with no one at the controls until it degraded/crashed. It's a leaky metaphor. | |
| ▲ | greyb 36 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's just a unique take on "not seeing the forest for the trees". | |
| ▲ | InsideOutSanta 24 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Google is distracted by AI and letting Google News, now un-captained, run into the pier. |
|
|
| ▲ | BYazfVCcq an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Because of the recent Ceuta incident I wanted to find some old articles, since I remembered a similar incident happened in 2021. I set the range to that year, but nothing happened, only articles from the last week turned up. Setting a time frame was one of my favorite and most used features of Google Search. |
| |
| ▲ | Quothling 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I have nothing to contribute to the google discussion, it's been a while since I used any of their products other than google pay, maps and youtube music. The big migrant crisis in Europe was in 2015 though. We get these things in smaller scale like what is happening in Ceuta and with the Spanish supreme court, but the big thing was back in 2015. In 2021 everything was locked down. Unless you're speaking about a specific Ceuta incident in 2021, in that case just ignore me. | |
| ▲ | jiri 31 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I can confirm, I cannot find it either on Google News/Search, with tools. I wonder how even is possible to index something like that. Is it obvious during index build that something is old? Is only needed to search ceuta 2021 - but it finds recent articles comparing current situation to 2021, not 2021 articles. Maybe problem is not that it cannot search for those articles from 2021, but that articles from 2021 are gone now, or they are buried so deep it is so hard to index them. | | |
| ▲ | input_sh 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | No, Google knows very well about each and every older source, it just refuses to show them. Here, I can easily prove it: search for something like "site:theguardian.com" and set the date filter to show you results before say 1/1/2020. I guarantee you you won't find a single news article within search results. You will find other pages from their site such as tag pages or old job postings of theirs and what not, but no news article what so ever. Then swap The Guardian for whichever news source you want and do the same. Then do the same on say DuckDuckGo and it'll work as intended. | | |
| ▲ | weitendorf 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Are you sure this is Google's doing? Sites can tell Google what they want indexed and want not to show, and Google's crawler also is supposed to not hammer sites with unwanted indexing, and has quotas where if your site has a massive amount of content but nobody is visiting/searching for some of it, they'll limit how much they crawl/show it. But this is something site operators want to control for their own purposes; I imagine a news media website gets very little real human traffic (and ad money) to 6 year old news articles, but a lot of bots looking for training data or just archiving their content. Considering news websites aren't loudly complaining about this I wouldn't be so sure it's not their own doing. | | |
| |
| ▲ | BYazfVCcq 25 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Doing the same on Kagi and DuckDuckGo worked though. Both search engines can filter by time and find articles from the 2021 incident. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | wseqyrku an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I suggest replacing google's News tab with Magic! because it's so heavily messed with you cannot make sense of the ranking. For some queries on ongoing events I've seen headlines come up from the last month or older as the first result. How hard you mofos want to suppress information? |
| |
| ▲ | nomel an hour ago | parent [-] | | I stopped using google for news during covid, when stories that went against the narrative were scrubbed from search results, sometimes within the same day, like anything related to myocarditis. Edit: maybe down voters are ok with a California tech corp dictating the information they read, but it would be good for you to look into the eventual conclusion of those topics. There was no justification scrubbing it all from results. I would be interested in the justification you see. | | |
| ▲ | alex1138 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I can't vouch for Google News during that time period but I'm with you. Fauci's diary came out just now and there are plenty of doctors and scientists who outright disagree with him on everything, you would think people would be better than "hurr. downvote." |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 3dedb728-3f77 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| imo, Google is just slowing dying. Each tools they made slowly lost trust until there is no way to believe it again. Idk if it is just the current propaganda, but they just told us we can't even trust google sat images.
So now we can't even trust google maps to drive. |
| |
| ▲ | input_sh 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | "Slowly dying" implies it's some sort of a natural process they have no control over, that's not what's happening. It's committing suicide, on purpose. It's a modern-day burning of the Library of Alexandria in favour of a shitty replacement. It's what we get for offloading such a basic web function in the hands of a private company that's just no longer interested in serving that basic function. | |
| ▲ | rexreed 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If Google is slowly dying, then Meta is quickly dying. I still never understood the hard reframe of their company to the Metaverse. Why was it so important that they had to pivot the whole brand? And now AI is here and they're 20 steps behind. But then again, everyone says the best way to test your brand on the market is to buy Meta ads so what do I know. I guess they're just the Yahoo of the 2020s. | | |
| ▲ | panick21_ 4 minutes ago | parent [-] | | They wanted a platform, something they controlled. They wanted to be Steam. They wanted to be microsoft. Own the ecosystem and charge everybody 35% for the rest of eternity. And remember Zuck has full control of the company. And his whole thing is not to actually return value to shareholders. His whole thing is believing that going 'all in' on the next big thing is the best thing you can do. Dropping 20-50+ billion, on every new 'thing' for the next 40 years is what they do. And they can do it because they have a money printing machine. |
| |
| ▲ | stock_toaster 24 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think trust in general has eroded. Rampant _overt_ corruption at the highest levels of western governments, wars, enshittification[0], decay[1], crumbling infrastructure, constant political gridlock.. It seems like it is everywhere, and people are exhausted. [0]: https://www.worseonpurpose.com [1]: https://decayindex.com |
|
|
| ▲ | zx8080 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Google is killing the habit of googling or searching in their userbase, in favour of using LLMs. No surprise most of the previous era google services will be thrown out of the window in the very near future. |
| |
| ▲ | rvba 40 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | And even why? They are allready written, why they break now? Someone useless is clearly vibe coding them to ruin. If google cares about cost then stop changing them and just leave few custodians | |
| ▲ | rvba 40 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | And even why? They are allready written, why they break now |
|
|
| ▲ | nchmy 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Has Google news ever worked in the past decade? All I've ever seen is just the same tabloid-style articles any time I've searched it. Like literally 0 sources of even minimal repute have ever shown for me. Are my settings somehow broken? |
|
| ▲ | gejose 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Just noticed that the foreign language shown in that screenshot is malayalam[1], a language spoken in a southern state of India. [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malayalam |
|
| ▲ | azan_ 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Recently using "" stopped working for me in Google search. While it was laughably bad at search before, now it's borderline unusable. Now it just ignores half of my search term and thanks to removal of "" I can't tell it I actually know what I want to search for. |
|
| ▲ | blobbers 19 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Google abandons a piece of software into decaying crap but their scale and 'free'-ness is so large that we don't get a good replacement for years and years... On a sidenote, is there anything good to replace google news? Similar thoughts with hackernews... |
|
| ▲ | dnw an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Google Finance’s redesign is also a disaster, IMHO. I liked the “classic.” I also don’t remember the last time I used Google search. |
|
| ▲ | mtkd an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The world you grew up in no longer exists |
| |
|
| ▲ | rzz3 38 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| To be fair I imagine it has very few users now; maybe a chicken and egg thing. Most people either get their news from a single news site or from social media these days. And no I'm not implying that no one verifies sources on these platforms, but either it's Reddit or Hacker News or TikTok or Twitter. |
|
| ▲ | gattr 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What a coincidence: just earlier today I noticed that normal search with "Tools/Past month" does not in fact filter by date (last time I used it some weeks ago, it had always worked fine). A temporary bug, I hope. |
|
| ▲ | hhanesand 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This date filter issue isn’t just in news, it’s happening across most Google search products. |
|
| ▲ | beybol 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| People don't like reading news these days. It is sad. Nevertheless Google is not supporting this product as they could. |
|
| ▲ | KellyCriterion 41 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Google News is one of their worst products; Im always impressed how this billion dollar company is not able to build a solid newsfeed/page. |
|
| ▲ | dgellow an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Kagi still going strong. I haven't regretted once paying for my subscription |
| |
| ▲ | EA-3167 an hour ago | parent [-] | | I think that’s the future of the internet, a tiered experience with paid services at the top and ad-supported slop at the bottom. |
|
|
| ▲ | zx8080 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The frog is almost boiled. |
|
| ▲ | jaredwiener 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'd suggest checking out forth.news. It's my project -- pulling in primary news sources (think pool reports, statements, alerts, press releases, etc) and mixing it with some trusted reporter info. It's all automated, which means its very fast to get breaking news out. (There is also https://pro.forth.news which is more granular, includes searchable archives, etc) If there are sources or areas we're not including that you'd like to see, please let me know - jared at forth dot news. |
|
| ▲ | maelito 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Ecosia has a news tab. Don't know how good it is. |
|
| ▲ | rc_mob 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Ground news is probably the best aggregator right now |
|
| ▲ | anigbrowl 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Google News has been garbage for a long time, to the point that I'm trying to construct an alternative in my garage (which is to say it may never be roadworthy). I feel the company has only cared about it as a way to own a major gateway to the news market in the first place, and once that was established had no interest in improving it. I met the head of Google News at a conference many years ago (2013? I forget) and asked him if they would ever expand on their customization features, for example X or Y. he did that annoying thing of giving a vague non-reply while looking into empty space, which still annoys me when I recall it. I would have preferred it if he had said ' less than 1% of our users ever touch the settings, so idk if it's worth it' or somesuch. I had the strong impression taht he lad little or not interest in the product. I still have an on old Nexus One android phone and powered it up recently, to see if it still worked. Google News from 2008 or so was still open on it, and I was astonished how information-dense it was compared to today - 10 headlines on a screen at once! |
|
| ▲ | bborud an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If Google News is the shrimp boat, then what is Google Search? |
| |
|
| ▲ | dalemhurley 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Google search was never a good product (just better than the other alternatives), it was always full of SEO slop from people gaming the algorithm with low quality Wiki How’s etc. It is now that LLMs are better, not perfect, it apprentices how bad it was. |
|
| ▲ | kamranjon an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I love this analogy and think it possibly also applies to search which just doesn’t work anymore and is full of AI generated garbage. What the hell happened to stack overflow? I don’t think I’ve gotten a google result for stack overflow in nearly 2 years. How have they just forgot how to make competent search? I didn’t think it’d happen so quickly but I honestly get better results from DuckDuckGo at this point. |
|
| ▲ | seemaze 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I coincidentally just abandoned a regular google search 'within the last year' because the first page of results were from 2011, 2013, 2022.. wtf? |
| |
|
| ▲ | rvba 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That is such a bad metaphor... |
|
| ▲ | iririririr an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| in other words, the entire american society depends on tools completely under capricious control of a few people who barely care about them. nobody might care about google news. i don't, because I've seen what the article describes happen years ago. honesty I'm shocked the author could use it until now. but imagine gmail going the way of the way of gplus. or cloudflare saying they will only allow iphone traffic tomorrow. or musk becoming friends with zucker and agreeing on running xitter and instagram just like truthsocial? |
| |
| ▲ | iririririr 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | let's see if anyone has the courage to propose 1Bi of the genius bill to fund the internet archive |
|
|
| ▲ | rubyn00bie 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I signed up for Kagi earlier today, because I went to Google to search for any recent leaks or tidbits on the 2027 WRX—- I had selected Tools > Time > Past Week and the results were utter nonsense. Results from two months ago, a month ago, literally everything except within the past week. Having it return “no matches” or the single weird site which shows nothing but ads and embeds every keyword combination possible would’ve been vastly better. It honestly feels like they’re just showing results that power their AI summary regardless of what you actually want. After 23ish years of using Google, this was the final straw. It’s wild to see them just shit on their primary product with reckless abandon. I’d guess we’re two years from Google releasing “search classic” to try and shore up their core business once enough people realize Google search is dead. |
|
| ▲ | shevy-java 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > As a journalist, I have used Google News for many years to catch up on topics in which I am interested. Interesting observation. I noticed this a few years ago already, when Google started to kill off Google search. I can give many examples but just a simple one: Google used to cache phpBB webforum conversations. I could even read entries that were available only to people who would log in, which was convenient, because I no longer had to log in to a certain website - the google bot gathered stuff every some weeks. Then suddenly Google killed it off. It was not a huge feature, of course, but I used it. This is just one example of many more that can be given. For some reason Google loves killing its own software: https://killedbygoogle.com/ Now with AI, things got evidently worse, quality-wise. It is like an AI battlefield - tons of software goes to the google cemetary now. I still sometimes check on google search news, but it has also gotten worse. Another recent change, on youtube ... I used to be able to read news entry from e. g. Jason Brant, who does biweekly reviews of awful movies, which can sometimes be entertaining. I used to be able to see the news. Then suddenly ... I am no longer able to see them. And I don't know WHY. Perhaps Jason stopped writing them - or Google changed things in youtube. I don't know. There is no transparency anymore; casual users have no chance to understand what is going on. Where to find announcements? I have no idea. Are there even any announcements? And this is just another example. More and more examples like that can be given "Google News has a Tools menu, where you can specify the range. You can also specify the language and location of the publication. Bit by bit, all of this just stopped working. " So that person has a similar experience as I have, just in other areas. Google loves killing things that used to work in the past. Another example: the dislike button. Google removed it or rather hid it (you can partially restore it via an extension). Google is abusing people here. It is ruining the UI and crippling functionality that used to work. Ublock origin is another thing that no longer works on Google chrome (well, it somewhat does; for instance it works on thorium). Google is by far the most evil and most annoying mega-corporation. Other contenders such as Facebook or Microsoft - they fit in, but Google is annoying more people than the other greedy US corporations. "Now, the most recent failure is that when I specify news published in, say, the past week, it just ignores that setting and gives me news published weeks, months or years in the past. Google has abandoned Google News and let it crash into the dock." That is also true. The big question, though, is ... why are there no replacements? For instance, I tried qwant, but they copy/pasted the horrible Google Search UI. That's bad. And the search results also suck. DDG same problem. The whole www stack got worse. A lot of this has been caused by Google and other walled garden builders, but really the www stack got worse, quality-wise, in the last 10 years or so. This is literally the shittification of the www what we are witnessing. And now comes the age sniffing surveillance too. Mark my words: Microsoft will force everyone to show their ID on Win11 and beyond. It will come. |
|
| ▲ | throw_m239339 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Just use a RSS Reader. Google Reader was great because it also suggested feeds one wasn't syndicated to yet, so it was great for discovery... that plus its search function... But hey, Google Plus!!! By the way, the only reason I didn't bother with Google Plus is that the site's (fixed) header was taking one third of my screen's real estate on a laptop... Why would the most brilliant minds in the world make such a dumb UI mistake? I will never know... |
|
| ▲ | pessimizer 41 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It is absolute garbage. I don't let sites set cookies (unless there's a session, or I'm forced to temporarily because of the new anti-scraping regime), and while Google lets me load or on search Google News no problem (yes, the results are bad), following a link sends me to a neverending captcha loop. It's either something a moron would do, or someone who wants to pressure visitors to accept tracking would do. They give me all the headlines to scrape, I can scrape every search, make my own news site with them, but leaving is impossible. Instead, I have to do what any scraper would automate, which is ctrl-c the headline and ctrl-v it into ddg, or even into google search, then follow that link. Google Books has been abandoned for a long time, too. The last thing they did before deciding never to look at it again was to shit up the entire UI. It now captchas every single pageload if you don't want to accept cookies. |
|
| ▲ | toomuchtodo an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Use Ground News instead. Their team is responsive to inquiries and feature requests. Enshittification of Google products continues. https://ground.news/ (no affiliation, just a customer) |
| |
| ▲ | mikelgan an hour ago | parent [-] | | I don't think that will work for what I'm looking for. I'm looking for very, VERY specific subjects like the Attachment Economy, synthetic relationships, and a hundreds others, and I need to know all the stories on this subjects or using these keywords that have been published in the United States in the past week. | | |
| ▲ | toomuchtodo an hour ago | parent [-] | | Thanks for sharing those requirements. What are the most comparable competitors to Google News today that you would use for this? | | |
| ▲ | jubilanti an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Lexis Nexis --- if you're willing to pay. Had access to it in school and I miss it! | |
| ▲ | mikelgan an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Kagi, obviously (disclosure: My son works for Kagi.) | | |
| ▲ | toomuchtodo 18 minutes ago | parent [-] | | What would you need built on top of Kagi to achieve similar results? I am attempting to solution this problem fwiw so that others have a non Google solution for this use case. (disclosure: paying Kagi customer, can pay more if needed for them to build more) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | tonyhart7 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| now, I get news from youtube videos and instead of watching it all, I transcribe it back to 2-3 paragraphs max using llm |
|
| ▲ | alex1138 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I'm convinced nobody works at these tech companies. It's like (another pop culture reference!) getting Homer Simpson's mechanical woodpecker that almost resulted in the nuclear explosion How can we piss off the MOST amount of users? I have a bet going with Fred in Accounting |
| |