| ▲ | ikut3hva 6 hours ago |
| Hi everyone I don’t usually comment on topics like this because there are so many biases and different perspectives involved. In the end, I believe only the person who has actually gone through the experience can truly understand it; otherwise, it often becomes just another judgment. We are an ASEAN family earning more than €200k gross annually (sorry for mentioning the TC, but there is a reason for it—please keep reading before judging). We have lived here for more than six years, and you know what? I still haven’t obtained either permanent residence or German citizenship simply because I don’t have a B1 certificate. So first things first: regardless of how much you contribute to the country, German is a must today if you want to obtain residency and stabilize your life here. I was honestly devastated when the officer told me that I was not eligible for permanent residence. That was also the moment when I started to feel that maybe I don’t actually need permanent residence in this country after all. Story 2: In an international working environment, German may not matter much at the IC level. But I’ve seen countless situations where Germans exchange a glance with each other, and suddenly the final decision is not what was agreed upon in the meeting. Over time, I’ve learned that there are many unwritten rules behind the scenes, and when you speak their language, you start to understand them. One bright thing is that maybe we’re still lucky. We bought our first home without fully understanding the laws, the government system, or the tax rules. We simply worked hard and played the game in a way that we believed would be sustainable in the long run. Whatever happens, we know there are still many other places we could go. Our children speak German natively, but they are also willing to go the extra mile to speak our mother tongue at home. If you ask me for one piece of advice for immigrants and emigrants in Germany, I’d say: life is short—play naked! |
|
| ▲ | dgs_sgd 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I appreciate your perspective, but I was curious what B1 proficiency actually entails and this is what I found [1]: - understand the main points of clear standard speech on familiar topics such as work, school, or leisure
- manage most situations that occur while traveling in German-speaking areas
- produce simple, connected text on familiar subjects
- describe experiences, events, dreams, hopes, and ambitions, and briefly explain your opinions or plans That seems like a reasonable standard of native language proficiency to ask of people who want to make the county with said language their permanent home. [1] https://www.sprachenatelier-berlin.de/en/topic/3736.german-p... |
| |
| ▲ | TheOtherHobbes 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | B1 is a completely fair minimum standard. It's normal for many countries to expect residents to have basic conversational adequacy. It's also the kind of requirement that's made explicit on government information about residency. So it shouldn't have been a surprise. | | |
| ▲ | dgs_sgd 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Like, I imagine if I moved to a country and couldn’t do the B1 things in their language, I would have daily obstacles doing basic life things. | | |
| ▲ | 14u2c 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not in most of Western and Central Europe. Everyone speaks great English. It actually can be a problem because most people switch to English as soon as they realize your are not a native speaker, which can make learning harder. | | |
| ▲ | aleph_minus_one 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Not in most of Western and Central Europe. Everyone speaks great English. For sure not in France and Spain (outside of tourist areas). |
| |
| ▲ | michaelt 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A lot of societies are set up to accommodate that society's dumbest members, and tourists, for most everyday tasks. Outside of the workplace and my hobbies, I can't remember the last time someone asked me to read more than a few words, write anything at all, or do any maths more complicated than "the 12:20 train is 10 minutes late" Personally I would say it's not respectful to a society to move there and not make a decent effort to learn the language - but I have no doubt a person could survive with only basic skills, if their workplace worked in their native language and they had an ethnic enclave as a support network. | | |
| ▲ | ben_w 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I have B1 German, finally managing an official certification at the start of this year despite living here since the end of summer of 2018. As societies require accommodations for idiots, I found it so easy to get by with the German I did know that I kept incorrectly assuming I was at B1 level for years and years. B1 requires being able to read headlines and a few paragraphs of a typical newspapers, to briefly plan events, that kind of thing; not just the ingredients and cooking instructions on the back of food packaging and know how much money to hand over to the cashier. Given what I still can't do, I can totally understand why so many job openings I see at the moment require B2 or C1: My grammar is still terrible, and my grasp of accents is still heavily biased towards a handful of podcasts and youtube channels, and being surprised by the conversation topic can still easily confuse me, as I found out on Sunday when someone's classic motorbike broke down outside my house and they asked to borrow a 19mm spanner. | |
| ▲ | mr_toad 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > for most everyday tasks That’s true, if you’re in Paris you can get by with very little French. But don’t be too surprised if Gendarmerie aren’t particularly lenient just because tu ne comprends pas le français. |
| |
| ▲ | blks 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That is not true for many countries, especially in EU, and especially when you move as a skilled worker. | |
| ▲ | aranelsurion 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I would have daily obstacles doing basic life things. That heavily depends on the city and country. I don't know where OP is, but for example in Berlin it's kinda rare to meet people not speaking any English, basically mostly old people/retirees don't. There are gyms where people speak English, cinemas with English subtitles, all kinds of doctors speak English, even a lot of bureaucracy like driving exams etc. can be taken in English. Speak to a random person in English, odds are very high they respond back in English. I'm not saying this to mean it's 100% easy of course. Default language is ofc German, and not knowing it locks you out sometimes. Just saying that it's possible to live in a city like Berlin and not speak the language, and most days you barely think about it. I'd say it's an obstacle once-twice a month rather than daily. | | |
| ▲ | aleph_minus_one 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Berlin is a completely different world than the rest of Germany. Never make the mistake of generalizing anything that you observed in Berlin to Germany outside of Berlin. |
| |
| ▲ | parineum 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | A country like the USA? | | |
| ▲ | thesmtsolver2 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | For the US, you don’t have to know English for permanent residency. You can even have your interview in your own language with an interpreter https://www.uscis.gov/citizenship/exceptions-and-accommodati... | |
| ▲ | cpursley 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For all its problems, the US is one of the best at accommodating non English. | |
| ▲ | ryandrake 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not really. There are many immigrant-majority communities in the USA where you can live most of your day-to-day without needing to speak much English. | | |
| ▲ | justacrow 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Any $200k+ SW engineering jobs? | | |
| ▲ | nkrisc 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I’ve known some devs who were recent immigrants and did not speak much English. It wasn’t FAANG and not West coast so I don’t think they were making $200k but they got by and often paired with other devs who spoke their language and much better English. Overall they were nice people and their English improved over time for the duration I knew them. It was a bit of a struggle to communicate sometimes but I didn’t mind it. Any time I felt frustrated about it I just thought about how they must be feeling, and it didn’t seem so bad anymore. English is a pretty forgiving language. | |
| ▲ | marseysneed 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In the bay area you can get away with very little english proficiency | |
| ▲ | ryandrake an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | OP was just talking about "doing basic life things." | |
| ▲ | ang_cire 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Honestly, this question is really revealing, because it's the lower-paid SWE jobs that are probably not Bay Area or NYC, which are precisely the places where lower* English fluency is most likely to be tolerated or even the majority. I was the only person on my 5-person team with 'Business English' at my first BA startup, so I got the job of writing all external-routing communications. When I worked remote for a Midwest company years later, it was very clear that anything but perfect English was disqualifying in the eyes of a lot of (Midwest white male) management there. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | vachina 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Exactly. Your life will be easier if you have B1. Your correspondence with everything is in German. |
| |
| ▲ | rurp 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It seems weird to me that someone would even want to settle in a foreign country without a good understanding of the language and cultural basics. I've done some traveling in non-English speaking countries and it was a huge hurdle not being completely fluent in the local language. It just seems like common sense to me to dive in all the way if you are moving somewhere long term. I don't really see what a good salary has to do with it either. When it's hard for me to communicate with a neighbor or coworker I don't care whether they have a high or low salary. | | |
| ▲ | overfeed 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > It seems weird to me that someone would even want to settle in a foreign country without a good understanding of the language and cultural basics These people typically call themselves "expatriates" | | |
| ▲ | annzabelle 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | There's also supposed to be a distinction about intent to leave in a relatively short predetermined time period. I consider myself an expat in New Zealand, because I'm on a ~2 year visa that cannot be extended, and I have no particular intent to try to transfer to a different visa. If I'd been here the same amount of time, in the same job, but on a straight to residency visa I intended to convert to PR/Citizenship, I would be an immigrant. |
| |
| ▲ | blks 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Travelling somewhere is not the same as living. It’s pretty common among people without immigration experience to have a certain idealistic idea about it, that does not work in reality. This person lives in a very international city where they speak English at work. For some people it’s not as easy to get to B1-B2 levels while working full time, having children and using English to communicate daily without issues. In many EU countries requirement for a permanent resident status is just 4-6 years of residency, plus sometimes certain income/language level. And there is always EU permanent residence permit that just requires you to reside for 5 years. | |
| ▲ | nkrisc 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well it’s definitely the best way to learn the language, if you’re motivated to do so. If you want to learn a language, the absolute best thing you can do is to be completely immersed in it. |
| |
| ▲ | djaro an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah, B1 is not even nearly fluent, on my B1 exam Spanish I had to roleplay with the examinator going to a store to return something after buying the wrong item. This is like, bare minimum of functioning. I cannot imagine living in a country for over a year and not taking the effort to lesrn the language. | |
| ▲ | thenoblesunfish 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Agreed, and (especially if you are a nerd who is good at tests) the description of the levels always seemed to me to imply more ability than what you really need to pass the test. OP, just study for the test and pass it. You can, and you will be proud of yourself and happier in your new home country. | |
| ▲ | ButlerianJihad 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Lyft and Uber, currently in my state, are onboarding drivers who are not required to speak any English at all. Their textual communications can occur through app translation, and the driver is not expected to understand anything a rider should say, because the driver should be following their app, not the rider's instructions. The joke is on them, though, because I happen to speak impeccable Spanish with 40 years' experience, and I've successfully intervened when the app inevitably misdirects the driver. I also happily greet drivers in Arabic, Hebrew, Hindi, or at least try to understand what country/dictatorship/failed state that they've emigrated/fled from, to be driving in the United States. | |
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | kombine 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My rule is that if you want to settle in the country, you ought to learn the local language and it doesn't really matter how much money you make in my opinion. I got to B2 and passed the test, but ultimately left Germany years ago. I don't intend to go back but I also don't regret learning the language. |
| |
| ▲ | sigmoid10 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I've lived in foreign places for less than 6 months and still bothered to pick up enough language to at least converse on a basic A1 level. Especially in certain regions where people don't speak english well this is almost a requirement for any daily life that is not work related. I can't imagine living somewhere for six whole years without picking up the language at all. Maybe if you actually hate the place and are sure you will leave again after that stint, but the above commenter doesn't seem to fall into this category either. | | |
| ▲ | RugnirViking 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | To be fair, B1 and especially B2 are not trivial requirements. A1 you will "pick up" like you say, but it's easy to fall into a trap of remaining around A2 without sustained effortful studying. (If you try to do it through just interacting with natives with no structure it's common to fossilize mistakes which take much longer to fix, or even just become permanent) Personally I've gotten to B2 (not Germany) which is enough for most purposes, but it would have been very possible to get stuck in a rut. It's very common for couples that move here for one to have a job, and the other to spend some months unemployed looking for a job. It's generally observed that those that have the job learn the job much slower and get stuck, and the ones that spend time at home and looking have much better outcomes longer term |
|
|
|
| ▲ | yorwba 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| FWIW, for Blue Card holders, after 27 months the language requirement drops to A1 and even if you don't have a Blue Card after five years you could also get an EU permanent residence without language requirement: https://www.make-it-in-germany.com/en/visa-residence/living-... Though I would recommend setting yourself a target of some small (≈10) number of new words to learn every day and practice them during your commute or so. B1 is achievable in under a year with consistent practice. The official word list has 2400 entries: https://www.goethe.de/pro/relaunch/prf/de/Goethe-Zertifikat_... |
| |
|
| ▲ | littlecranky67 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As a german living in spain, i feel your pain. While I do speak spanish around B1/B2 level, it took a lot of time and effort - probably the biggest effort in learning something after uni. People are often "you should speak the language if you life there" - yes, agreed. BUT: Hell, if you are a professional entrepreneur, you are already not working 40h week but way more. If in your day job you speak english anyway because it is international, you hardly practice it. Especially in the EU we are taught that we can move freely between nation states - but reality of learning a language takes years. I learned english at age 10, so am practicing for over 30 years now and still learning and anybody could spot that I am not a native speaker. Countries that rely on foreign labour and advertise agressively on skilled immigration (such as Germany does) should not have those strict language requirements. Especially since german itself is a very difficult language. |
| |
| ▲ | delis-thumbs-7e 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | None of this people opining “just learn the language” have learned a second language while working as adults, let alone learned German. You can get to A2 level pretty easy (in most indoeuropean languages at least), but jumping to B1 can seriously be a year or more of studying. You have to be able to handle basic daily situations in the given language and understand what is said in a TV or Radio show. With practice you can get there especially if you live in the country and force yourself to speak the language, but easy it is not. | | |
| ▲ | rjh29 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | It's not easy. I learned Japanese at 28 and am now proficient. But I didn't want to spend my whole life asking other people to translate things for me, being permanently ostracised from conversations, or causing problems for others by forcing them to speak English. It's basic decency imo. | |
| ▲ | 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | aleph_minus_one an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > None of this people opining “just learn the language” have learned a second language while working as adults, let alone learned German. I am very certain this is not true. The "just learn the language" people are typically rather people who are very talented in learning new languages (and often indeed to this as adults as a personal hobby - often even with languages from very different families), and thus are often not easy to convince that not everybody is as talented in language learning as they are. Believe me, I know this kind of people: I just want to quote some polyglot person who very casually said: "Being fluent in five languages is not something to be proud of - this is rather minimum standard." (she had the opinion that rather keeping fluent in 10 [!] languages is something that takes steady learning efforts to retain the obtained level in all of the 10 languages). | | |
| ▲ | pessimizer an hour ago | parent [-] | | I've always heard it said that "polyglot" starts with the fourth language. The opinion is that to have a at-home (family) language, an outdoor (regional) language and a market (capital) language is too common to be considered truly exceptional. Once you pick up the fourth, you're getting into hobby territory. Kató Lomb (maybe the first official "simultaneous translator" wrote about gaining, losing, and maintaining languages entertainingly and in detail. edit: "Polyglot: How I Learn Languages" https://www.tesl-ej.org/books/lomb-2nd-Ed.pdf "With Languages in Mind: Musings of a Polyglot" https://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej78/WLIM.pdf |
| |
| ▲ | djaro 44 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I would disagree about it not being "easy". Learning a language certainly takes time and effort, but the fact that even the dumbest people in society can speak fluently, that literal toddlers learn languages, shows that it's far from difficult. It just requires turning your rational mind off, immersing yourself in the language and trusting things will work out, something which more rational/analytic people tend to struggle with. It's telling that children from non-English countries naturally become completely fluent in English by just playing video games and watching YouTube videos, while adults will struggle for years to reach conversational fluency in their second language. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | lispisok 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| So your complaint is you wanted permanent residence in Germany but did not want to learn to speak German? |
| |
| ▲ | brewdad 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Most countries will grant PR without requiring a language proficiency. Assuming your immigration status is regular and you are a contributing member of society. Citizenship? Absolutely, you must speak the language. Residency? Not nearly as common. | | |
| ▲ | angott 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Most countries will grant PR without requiring a language proficiency Hmm, is that really the case? Or perhaps you're confusing work visas with permanent residency? Most attractive destinations for immigrants usually require a language test for PR. Ignoring the United States and its dysfunctional immigration system, a language test is required or practically required almost anywhere there is a points-based system to obtain PR. The UK requires a language exam to be granted leave to remain. Canadian federal programs for PR require a language test result to even be considered for the Express Entry program. In Europe, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Italy also require it, and I'm sure there are more I'm not aware of. Also, B1 is honestly a very basic level of proficiency with the language. It is really hard to be a productive member of society and interact with locals if you cannot speak at a B1 level. | | |
| ▲ | thesmtsolver2 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes. The US doesn’t require language fluency for green cards. You can even bring your own interpret to the interview. United States issues the highest absolute number of permanent residency permits in the world. It grants approximately 1 to 1.4 million lawful permanent resident (LPR) cards (Green Cards) annually | | |
| ▲ | pessimizer 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The US is an exception, doesn't require language proficiency for almost anything, and doesn't have an official language. This is very controversial in the US, and always has been. Historically, this can originally be blamed on the desire of the US to import as many European immigrants as quickly as it could after the slaves were freed (post-"1877 Compromise"), because ex-slave votes were changing the composition of government. In 1910, only 60% of white Americans were native born (as opposed to about 98.5% of black Americans.) This period is also referred to as the "nadir of American race relations." |
| |
| ▲ | pimterry 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | One counter-example: in Spain no language test is required for permanent residency, only for citizenship. | | |
| ▲ | volkl48 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Spain is historically trying to attract old foreign retirees with money who will spend their retirement savings/pensions there, but probably doesn't want that same group voting unless they really have assimilated. So that set of rules makes sense for their immigration model but is also probably not a place to look to for setting policy if your immigrants are working-age adults (that are coming there to work, not retire early). |
|
| |
| ▲ | kuschku 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Germany treats permanent residency much more like a "citizenship lite", e.g., if you are a permanent resident[1] any newborn children will automatically be German citizens (even though Germany has no jus soli). ________________________ Footnotes: [1]: As long as at least one parent is a permanent resident and has in Germany for at least 5 years (the same duration that's usually required to become a permanent resident anyway) | |
| ▲ | sva_ 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Most countries will grant PR without requiring a language This statement is clearly false, off the top of my head only USA and Spain come to mind. There are some countries like Japan where there it isn't a hard requirement, but you'd need a very good reason to justify why | |
| ▲ | baranul 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Correct. Seems like various people are confusing the two. The issue of granting PR, is often about an additional tax and labor source for the government of that country. For example: 1) Low birth rates and high ageing population percentage, this can be offset with immigration. Then PR status can be granted, as a kind of carrot and better tax revenue generation "filter". 2) Labor market manipulation and facilitating international business, where immigration is used to fill holes in various industries. Why a country would want to grant PR, usually has different purposes from citizenship. There is overlap, but they aren't the same. | |
| ▲ | pandaman 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Which countries are those? In Europe there seems to be only Portugal and only for select categories of permanent residents. |
| |
| ▲ | zerr 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Permanent residency is a business deal between two entities: an individual and a state. It has nothing to do with linguistics. There are many Germans permanently living in Vietnam, Thailand and other Southeast Asian countries, who never bothered to even learn how to say Hello, not to mention any certificate or exam... | | |
| ▲ | jyounker 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I can't imagine any Germans I know describing permanent residency as a business relationship. | |
| ▲ | mongol 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | No, permanent residency is more than a business deal. It is a deal about all aspects of life, business or not. | |
| ▲ | mr_toad 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Permanent residency is a business deal between two entities: an individual and a state. I doubt that Germans see it that way. | |
| ▲ | xdennis 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A country is not a contract, it's a culture. It's quite audacious to want to be part of a country, but also to be so quarantined from them as to not even want to learn their language. | |
| ▲ | consensus1 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Permanent residency is a deal (not necessarily business related) between two entities: an individual and a state. It has everything to do with whatever requirements that the two parties have, and if there is no agreement on them there is no deal. In this case the state cares about language proficiency and requires it for a deal, so if you are not proficient in German there is no deal. | |
| ▲ | FabCH 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I mean, even if you insist on viewing it as a business deal, what exactly prevents one side to put language requirements in the business deal? That’s how deals work, both sides state their position and either they find a middle ground or they don’t. | | |
| ▲ | zerr 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Business deal means the requirements should be rational, pragmatic. | | |
| ▲ | FabCH 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Well, why is „learn the language“ not a rational and pragmatic requirement? Seems rational to me. Want to live in country X permanently? Learn language X. | | |
| ▲ | zerr 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I mean, when you have already proven that you are net positive for the state, and continue doing so, requiring you to pass some exams is not rational. PR != citizenship. Will I have a bit difficulty buying some groceries in a local market? Maybe, but that shouldn't bother the state. Also, you can live permanently without PR. PR unlocks some additional perks, which again, have nothing to do with linguistics. | | |
| ▲ | mongol 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You can be a net positive one day, next day you lose your job and are not. On the other hand, permanent is supposed to be without end. An unemployed worker with no language skills in the local language quickly becomes a burden Residency while employed is rational. If you want to stay longer, learn the language | |
| ▲ | vanviegen 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > net positive for the state Being a good citizen is not the same as (or even all that much related to) receiving an above average salary. | |
| ▲ | FabCH 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Are you a net positive? Just because somebody pays taxes, it doesn’t necessarily make them a net positive. For example, do you contribute culturally? That can be quite hard to do without speaking the language. What about defense. Would you fight for the country? Hard to do if you don’t understand the orders. What about spiritually? Emotionally? | | |
| ▲ | zerr 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I believe you are mixing permanent presidentship with citizenship. That's why I've clarified that PR != citizenship. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | mrighele 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Asking you to learn German in in Germany is both rational and pragmatic, as it is a good way to be a functioning member of the society. |
|
| |
| ▲ | baranul 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Exactly! Though it often seems that people conveniently forget the reverse scenario. Them in other countries is fine and relax about requirements, others in their country, not so much. | | |
| ▲ | consensus1 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | One country is not in any way obligated or expected to have the same entry requirements as another. It is based on priorities of the state and those differ greatly between states. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | svara 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Genuinely happy to hear you're successful here! But, why would you expect there to be no drawback to not knowing the local language when moving to a foreign country? |
| |
| ▲ | ikut3hva 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Definitely, I had a good awareness of the language barrier from the day I arrived. To be fair, I have continued learning German—not because I want to pass the B1 examination and obtain permanent residence, but because I feel my children need to be protected and guided, and I want to teach them the same things they learn at school. Every moment I spend learning the language is a moment I invest out of love, so that I can be a better and more supportive parent. | | |
| ▲ | jitix 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Then why are you complaining about the language requirement for permanent residency? You knew the tradeoffs and chose them willingly, enjoy your income, invest in your home country and move back once you retire. Simply making higher-than-median income should not make you eligible for permanent residency. Cultural immersion and assimilation is important to maintain social stability and language is just the first step. From what I found (and as another commenter pointed out) the bar is not even that high. Edit: For context I am not a right winger and am an immigrant myself. But I am seeing the social fabric of my host country (Canada) degrade because of immigrants' refusal to assimilate. | | |
| ▲ | blks 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Why do you want people with foreign backgrounds to “assimilate”? If you were to move to France, are you going to abandon your own language, culture, and play-pretend to be a Frenchman? If you live somewhere long enough, know the country, work and handle daily life without issues, have social connections with other people in this society, understand at least some language - in my opinion you are as integrated in that country as needed. | | |
| ▲ | pessimizer 20 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | You're making it sound like the desire to be a Frenchman is an unreasonable requirement for becoming a Frenchman. > abandon your own language, culture Thank god nobody is asking this. They're being asked to learn enough French to participate in France. B1 is hard, but it ain't B2, and you'll still barely understand what's going on around you. | |
| ▲ | jpmoral an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
| |
| ▲ | romanhounds 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm pretty sure asking for social stability is considered racist. So how dare you. Anyone should be able to move anywhere, do anything they want, and if the locals complain. Well they are racist. | | |
| ▲ | joe_mamba 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Of course social stability IS racist, only thing that matters is GDP line-go-up no matter the societal cost. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | NorthSouthNorth 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You can get B1 with a bit of spare time. With kids, I understand it's a different situation; however, it took me about 2 years to get there, learning in my spare spare time (which after a certain point was just listening to audio books before bed). The compounding effect works. BUUUUT, even with B2, it's just not enough for avoiding "the look", as you put it. I think you need flawless C1 or something, idk. Don't care anymore lol. |
| |
| ▲ | merb 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Most b2 holders can’t even speak German. B1 is not that much better nowadays. You get tons of applications for a job where people struggle with the basics with these and as a small company with only DACH customers it’s most often not worth it |
|
|
| ▲ | kshacker 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > (sorry for mentioning the TC, but there is a reason for it .... sorry to nitpick on this, but the story did not expand on this despite the pronouncement that there is a reason. Maybe it was subtle, but then let it be subtle. |
|
| ▲ | pimeys 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Hey. I'm with you there. My German also kind of sucks, but I've had a very successful 15 years in Berlin. The best part is how easy it is to pick jobs from the neighboring countries, like France. You pay taxes here, you commute maybe once a month to Paris and enjoy the prices and quietness of Berlin. We are lucky with my partner, and bought finally our own apartment. My partner, an American, is fluent with the language so it helps. My plan is to make a good amount of savings, take a year or so of sabbatical and finally learn the language. Until that, we go with bar Deutsch. |
| |
| ▲ | ikut3hva 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Thank you! I skimmed through your text, and for a moment I thought we were working at the same company with its HQ in Paris, haha. Honestly, you brought up a valuable point that I didn’t cover in my original comment. Living in Germany has been one of the best ways to strengthen our relationship, especially when one of us couldn’t speak German and the other stepped in to help. Some people may see this as a fragile vulnerabilitye, but I see it as part of our growth. | | |
| ▲ | pimeys 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | For me it's only about getting into the local scene more now, to learn the language. I kind of started to finally understand the German inefficiency, the distributed nature of the country and their culture. Now when we bought our apartment, the need to be part of the culture is bigger than ever. And at the same time I'm so busy for the past 10 years already, there's more work than ever in my life. Just need to say stop one day, take a year off and go to language school. P.S. I don't think it's the same company: the other devs are either in Paris or in Scandinavia. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | jyounker 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You're always going to be an outsider if you can't speak the language, no matter where you go in the world. B1 is a reasonable level, as it's the bare minimum for doing day-to-day tasks in the local language. I honestly can't image planning to live in any country for the long term without learning the local language to at least this level. |
|
| ▲ | ggm an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| An observation from the side, is that this person already speaks 2 languages, and very probably more. They aren't dumb, I do question their logic, but the capacity to speak more than one tongue is in this person, witness their writing in English, and stating they come from an ASEAN background. That means at least one non-english language, and for many ASEAN economies, more than one. eg Chinese both Manderin and Cantonese, Indonesian and Chinese, some Chinese and Vietnamese, Korean and Chinese, these are combinations I have met at work here in Australia aside from "and english" I've had lifts from Uber drivers who speak 4 tongues fluently. |
|
| ▲ | try-working an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I am European, working in China for 12 years making multiples of the average salary, speak Chinese above B1 level and am not eligible for permanent residency yet. First of all, if you want to become a resident somewhere you must learn the language. Not should. Second, no country owes any foreign citizen residency there. |
|
| ▲ | ManuelKiessling 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you cannot be bothered with learning our language, and think that being rich somehow makes our country owe you its citizenship — then yeah, maybe Germany isn’t for you. |
| |
| ▲ | arianvanp 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Permanent Residency -- not citizenship. Residency is purely about taxes, health insurance and right to work. You e.g. don't get voting rights in national elections. EU citizens automatically get permanent residency in any EU country regardless of language. E.g. I'm a permanent resident in Germany as a Dutchie. (However I did end up picking up German and speak it now. But never had to do a language test) | | |
| ▲ | pantalaimon an hour ago | parent [-] | | > EU citizens automatically get permanent residency in any EU country regardless of language. Yea free movement and choice of residency is one of the main points of the EU |
|
|
|
| ▲ | BobbyTables2 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What other country looks appealing? I get the whole “speak the native language” but seems like the appealing countries speak a language most of the world doesn’t care about. The number of countries with English as the main/official language that are desirable and open to immigrants seems really small. |
| |
|
| ▲ | screye 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| B1 German is about 1 year of intensive studying from zero. With immersion and part-time commitment, I'd say ~3 years is a comfortable timeline to learn B1 German. I am basing this off my personal experience of going from A1 -> A2 -> half-way through B1 (I dropped after I decided against studying in Germany, but my classmates continued the course). Given that German companies are known for excellent work-life balance, there should be enough spare time to learn German by the 5 year point. All that being said, I imagine it's harder to learn a language when you have kids and family responsibilities. |
|
| ▲ | m_dupont an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I lived in Germany for seven years and by the end I was fluent. B1 is a very low bar to pass, I know because I've done it. Sorry to say, but the rule is fair. If you want to be a permanent resident, put in a little bit of effort to integrate into the country that you would like to call home. |
| |
| ▲ | coderenegade 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | This. German really isn't that difficult for an English speaker. And if someone really wants to make a home and build a life in a foreign country, why would they expect that they don't need to learn the native language? That seems stunningly entitled to me. |
|
|
| ▲ | rayiner 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Story 2: In an international working environment, German may not matter much at the IC level. But I’ve seen countless situations where Germans exchange a glance with each other, and suddenly the final decision is not what was agreed upon in the meeting. Over time, I’ve learned that there are many unwritten rules behind the scenes, and when you speak their language, you start to understand them. I mean, how many CEOs of major German companies are non-German? The country does seem much more insular than the Anglosphere. |
|
| ▲ | shakow 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Having B1 seems like a really lenient condition to get citizenship. I got B2 after 6 months of Erasmus, and I have B1 in Russian even though I never even stepped in the country. Have you even tried to learn German, and if so what is so hard that you can't even get B1, although you stayed long enough to have kids speaking natively the language? |
|
| ▲ | dudul 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How do you live 6 years in a country without reaching B1? |
| |
| ▲ | sufficientsoup an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I think some people just get an irrational block about learning particular things. Like maybe you struggle with a music class in school and just identify as being incapable of learning an instrument, for example, even if they're a skilled learner otherwise. Can't speak for OP, obviously. | |
| ▲ | backwardsponcho 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You'd be surprised at the lengths some will go to avoid learning a new language. I've met people who have lived over 20y in a country while working, having and raising kids there and still can't have a half decent basic conversation in the local language. There is always an excuse: too much work, too little time, too tired or you name it, but the end result is that they are inconveniencing themselves. Not saying it is OP's case, just some anecdotal obserevations. | | |
| ▲ | djaro 39 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The thing that makes this illogical to me is that once you reach basic fluency, you stop needing to study since you will now be automatically improving your language skills every time you hold a conversation, read a newspaper, watch a television program, etc. It's genuinely just the relatively small initial hurdle towards ~B1 that is a slog, but after that, you never have to actively study again if you don't want to. | | |
| ▲ | betaby 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It doesn't feel like that for me. I reached professionally assessed B1 in French about 6 years ago and I don't feel I've reached B2 yet. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | newyankee 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Well I am an Indian who lived in US and worked for top companies for 10 years and left back to my home country as I did not want to be beholden to the Green card waiting time or take some unethical pathways (I see a lot of abuse of O1 now). I find coworkers from smaller and friendlier countries sail through and become Americans. The point is that immigration can never really become a true meritocracy and even I recognised the privileges I had to reach to US in the first place. The country's ethos, ideas are grandfathered into the law alongwith numerous loopholes or sneaky ways. There is never a social compact where I did X , I deserve Y coming true. I suspect globally we are at the tail end of this type of immigration from Global South to Global North as well |
|
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | eldaisfish 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There is yet another angle that people don't like to discuss because it is uncomfortable. Every European nation state is built around ethnicity as the bedrock of society. This makes it nigh on impossible to integrate fully in these countries. The way this manifests is different in each country, but the fundamental reason is the same. In the german case, take the words of Messut Ozil, the former footballer - when the German team wins, he is German. Lose, and he is the immigrant. He is ethnically Turkish, i.e. not ethnically German. The same will apply to your kids as well. I want to be clear, not every German person is a frothing racist, i would argue that the racists are a minority. It is, however, important to note that the reactions of the individual and the reactions of society can be different, sometimes polar opposites. In sharp contrast to this are the US and Canada, where there is no shared definition of "white" even though the majority of their populations are ethnically European. In that case, "European" spans everything from Irish and Greek, to French and Austrian. Less than a hundred years back, Irish people were not seen as white. Today, that idea is laughable. The fundamental difference between the US and Canada on one side and German or european society on the other is that the old world is built around exclusion, while the new world is built around inclusion. This is one important reason why skilled immigrants leave europe, and is also why i left. |
| |
| ▲ | OrangeDelonge an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | You’re right but I think the US/Canada are just exceptions. Essentially every other nation on earth (not just Europe) is what you describe Europe to be. | |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | baranul 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I want to be clear, not every German person is a frothing racist, i would argue that... Of course not every German has fallen into the abyss of such insanity, but sorry to inform you (for those that have never been), way too many have. There are also levels to it as well, where various people may not be so open about it, but very much embrace and practice it. This then is reflected in housing, jobs, or even nightclubs. > The way this manifests is different in each country, but the fundamental reason is the same... While in agreement with this argument, the levels of hostility can be very different, depending on the European country. Views and treatment of other people in regards to color or xenophobia in the Netherlands, Germany, or the Czech Republic can be wildly different. The US and Canada should not be viewed as better, but how things manifest themselves are different, which can result in different experiences and outcomes. Maybe better or maybe even worse. | |
| ▲ | bcye 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Every European nation state is built around ethnicity as the bedrock of society. What do you mean by it being the bedrock of society? I haven't found ethnicity to be an important part about being a citizen here at all. | | |
| ▲ | kuschku 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > A nation state, or nation-state, is a political entity in which the state (a centralized political organization ruling over a population within a territory) and the nation (a community based on a common identity) are congruent. See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_state The traditional view taught in history books is as follows: > Before the french revolution, states extended as far as their kings' military power allowed them to, and the king derived his claim to power from god. > After the french revolution, states formed around the concept of a common shared ethnicity, language, and culture (nation), with the claim to power deriving from the people. > This shared national identity was instrumental to the unification of many separate kingdoms into the German confederation. EDIT: That view is not necessarily correct (see the comments below), but it is what most people will have learnt in school | | |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | FabCH 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | YSK: This is a disputed view. Wether nation comes first, or the state, is something academic historians don’t agree on. While it sort-of fits if you limit it to France, it breaks down even when you cross the border to Germany. Three different countries speak German as their official language, and Germany itself wasn’t really a nation-state until Nazism. It was a multi-ethnic empire before that, and a bunch of random kingdoms and ducheys before that. And after 1945, it was not a nation-state either, since it was somewhat famously 2 states. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | 486sx33 34 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [dead] |