| ▲ | steve1977 7 hours ago |
| What I find interesting is that the article seems to imply that wearing earbuds to isolate is somewhat "unnatural" (for lack of a better term). However it does not take into account that the kind of social interactions where people wear earbuds (i.e. loud and busy environments with many strangers, often physically closer than comfortable) is unnatural to begin with. For me, isolating myself acoustically is a way to normalize such environments back to a more "natural" setting. |
|
| ▲ | seizethecheese 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| Funny how new technology is unnatural but old technology, (that existed before we were born, like cars, streets, subways) are “natural”. |
|
| ▲ | nicbou 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yes! When walking along busy streets, I put my airpods on without music just to remove some of the car noise. |
| |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | I do the same when visiting large metropolitan areas! I don't want to be completely deaf, but reducing all the high-pitched noises and rumbling really makes my perception see/hear the environment more calmly. |
|
|
| ▲ | gijsnijholt1980 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Agreed.
Unrelated pro-tip: wearing them while riding a motorcycle. Reduces fatigue and transforms a rough experience into almost luxurious. Highly recommended. |
| |
| ▲ | GJim 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Stupidly dangerous and (in my country) illegal. Please retract your comment and don't encourage such stupidity. EDIT: Since this is being misinterpreted... Earplugs that deaden sound are fine and encouraged on a motorbike, playing music in your ears is what masks other sound and is both stupid and illegal. | | |
| ▲ | infecto 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Really depends on how they are being worn. If they are on without any sound being played its fine. Ear plugs are highly encouraged while riding a motorcycle and after a decade plus of riding I have never thought ear plugs along with a headset prevented me from hearing whats going on around me. Maybe it is your own misinterpretation as the parent never said they were playing music on them. You might not realize just how loud the wind noise is on a bike, you are not exactly hearing your surroundings music or not. Most if not all of your awareness on a motorcycle is coming from your eyes not ears, so hard to really say its stupid. | | |
| ▲ | esperent 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | There's just a tiny step from wearing noise canceling earphones with no music playing, to pressing a button and blaring Bat out of Hell while you speed down the mountainside. In any case, it's irrelevant - as far as I know, wearing headphones or earphones while driving a motorcycle is illegal whether or not you happen to be playing music in them, because how would anyone else know? If you get in an accident and get charged with distracted driving, that's on you. If you want earplugs, just wear them. They're much cheaper and more effective than sound cancelling headphones if you genuinely just want to block noise. | | |
| ▲ | infecto 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not sure what your trying to a argue but it simply depends on the local laws but from a safety perspective I cannot think of many opportunities the sound would save you as it’s already loud enough from wind noise alone. I ride with a comm system that I play media over and trying to be reflective of my past and I don’t see it. Not really advocating one way or the other like yourself, I don’t have that strong of a feeling about that law but from purely a safety aspect I don’t fully agree with the opinion. If you don’t want to wear ear protection just don’t wear it. It’s your ears. | | |
| ▲ | throw0101c 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > I ride with a comm system that I play media over and trying to be reflective of my past and I don’t see it. One risk is your focus going from what's on the road to what's coming into your ears. This may have some useful mental aspects if you're doing a long-distance drudgery ride down Route 66 with nothing much happening in between pitstops, but it's another thing on I-5 or I-95 with all sorts of chaotic lane changes going on. | | |
| ▲ | infecto 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Visual awareness is much more important for safety than sound especially once your at speed. Distracted driving is completely different and can happen anywhere. We should be arguing that cars should not have any speakers if that’s the case. |
| |
| ▲ | patcon 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I cannot think of many opportunities the sound would save you as it’s already loud enough from wind noise alone I am a bit stunned reading this..
Is this a common perspective of motorcyclists? | | |
| ▲ | infecto 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What is the stunning part? It’s not so much a perspective but pretty common safety advice, visual awareness is much more important than sound while operating a motorcycle. I suspect the gap is from folks who have only driven a car so there can be a sense of shock. Like all things it does depend on where you ride and the general driving culture. In America that’s how I ride but in Vietnam it’s very different. Road rules are not as often followed and honking is common to make yourself known, usually while there I wear lower db reduction ear protection. I am also not saying that there is zero opportunity to hear a horn but already on a motorcycle you have to have so much more awareness that I don’t find that sounds are all that helpful. It absolutely applies to driving a car too, after driving a motorcycle for a while I am as shocked as you just how unaware drivers are of their surroundings. Keep in mind at around 35mph you can easily hit 85-90db from the wind. I do think ear protection actually helps identifying sounds but I still argue the hearing part is not that helpful. I am not trying to say you have to follow my methods but folks calling for criminal punishment and shaming are a bit too far as the safety benefit from hearing is quite minimal depending on the driving culture. | |
| ▲ | throw0101c 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I am a bit stunned reading this.. Is this a common perspective of motorcyclists? No. For example, every beginner-advice thread in /r/motorcycle has a highly-upvoted comment(s) recommending ear protection, including many folks stating they wish they had started using it earlier. And even if it is conceded that sound may not save you from other vehicles, ear pro(tection) reduces the health risk of hearing loss that would effect other aspects of your life. | |
| ▲ | Zak an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | At highway speeds, the wind is loud. The engine is often loud even with a factory exhaust. The only audible signal that's likely to matter is a car horn, and those are loud enough to hear over music at reasonable volume. Cars are quieter, and hearing other vehicles is more likely. If anyone shouldn't listen to music, it's car drivers, not motorcyclists. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 12 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's been decades since I've ridden motorcyles but as I recall the helmet usually had foam padding over the ears and that was adequate for wind and noise reduction. | |
| ▲ | yonaguska 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Since the advent of EVs, its not a safety issue imo. When Tesla's first came out, and the first adopters were all people that wanted to drive FAST, I was often surprised by them, especially since I always rode slightly faster than traffic as a safety mitigation technique. I quickly learned to use my eyes more. My eyes are my ears and you cannot rely on sound to know who or what might be coming up from behind you. Mirrors and head on a swivel are way more important. | | |
| ▲ | SenHeng an hour ago | parent [-] | | It’s been a thing since the Prius allowed driving with the engine off with parents complaining that the Prius is a silent killer of kids because they couldn’t hear them coming. |
| |
| ▲ | t-3 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Deaf people manage to get licenses with no problem. My hearing was never tested to get my license, unlike my eyesight. | | |
| ▲ | timcobb 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Deaf people have a lifetime of training (hopefully) and experience dealing with things like this in ways the are appropriate for their situation | | |
| ▲ | culturestate 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Deaf people have a lifetime of training (hopefully) and experience Not every deaf person is born that way, mate. | |
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
| |
| ▲ | stasomatic 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Is using headphones on a bike with music on or not somehow different from driving in a Lexus with music on or not? | | |
| ▲ | Enginerrrd 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah, it’s definitely higher risk. When riding a motorcycle, you’ll encounter people that don’t see you almost every trip. The same is not true in a car. Riding a bike is just a 100% engagement thing with higher risks and lower margins for error, for all kinds of reasons. And it’s not just traffic, minor pavement imperfections become relevant, the necessary skill floor is also higher. It just demands more attention, straight up. In a car, you shouldn’t, and it’s not without risk, but you CAN occasionally get away with minor distractions: adjusting the radio, seat, etc. That just doesn’t work on a bike as well. I’m failing to properly articulate the why, but it really is fundamentally different in some ways. I’ve spent many years doing both, and the bike just demands more of your attention resources, independent of your vulnerability in the event of an accident. | |
| ▲ | 9dev 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Noise cancellation headphones that will block out loud things or ambulances approaching you, sitting exposed on a motor strapped to two wheels at a high speed? Yes. That is different from driving in a Lexus. | | |
| ▲ | stasomatic an hour ago | parent [-] | | I drive a car and ride a bicycle and an e-bike in Miami. The ANC isn’t that magical, I hear plenty of out of the algorithm noises (ambulances, etc). Head on a swivel and look straight. |
| |
| ▲ | mylifeandtimes 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | well, one comes with a pretty strong safety cage, so there is that difference. | |
| ▲ | MagicMoonlight 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
| |
| ▲ | somehnguy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I wear earplugs and play music via Cardo while riding nearly every single day. It's fine. Let's be realistic - noise cancelling isn't a perfect technology. I rode with my AirPods for a short period of time and could still hear everything I needed to. The only reason I switched is because they're uncomfortable in a helmet. | |
| ▲ | Broken_Hippo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | My earbuds have a setting to allow for outside noises. Wearing them while walking, I often hear cars and other people well before I see them. Even with louder music, I still hear them. I can hold a conversation with people without taking them out. I don't wear them without music, though, because my own breathing is also louder and irritating. If I have the noise cancelling turned on, it would be downright unsafe. While it is likely illegal in many places, it isn't everywhere and the safety risk depends on what sort of equipment you have. | |
| ▲ | psp99 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It is not illegal in every country. Further, wind noise and exhaust are too loud to hear anything anyway, so having music on and navigation is a bonus. | | |
| ▲ | esperent 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's completely untrue, speaking as someone who drives a motorcycle every day, at least if you're not driving some horrible (to everyone around you) 500cc beast, you can hear things just fine. Especially horns, trucks, busses etc. | | |
| ▲ | infecto 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Speaking as someone who has raced, commuted and has run multiple iron butts. Only really true at low speeds and if you are not wearing ear protection (which is a choice). Once earpro is in and you are going a decent speed there is really not much to be heard. Have never found hearing to save me from situations. If someone is honking that I am in danger I am probably already in it. Absolutely your choice not to wear hearing protection though. Eventually you will get naturally immune to it. | | |
| ▲ | esperent 28 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > If someone is honking that I am in danger I am probably already in it. This is an incredibly dumb and dangerous attitude to hold and you need to rethink things if you've become so overconfident in your driving because you've raced or done "iron butts", whatever those are. Driving on real roads isn't like racing and you need to separate your attitudes and driving styles in each situation before your arrogance causes an accident. Remember that it's not just your life on the line but the other innocent people around you too. |
| |
| ▲ | nehal3m 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You’re failing the shibboleths though. You don’t drive a motorcycle, you ride one. A 500cc bike is low mid range, not a beast. You can’t hear rolling or engine noise of cars, trucks or busses over 50kph if you’re wearing a helmet. Further, sound deadened cars with the stereo on an appreciable level also aren’t conducive to perceiving what’s around you. Speaking as someone who commuted on 600 twins and 300 singles for years, if you’re wearing hearing protection and listening to some tunes and navigation hints you’re fine. Just ride defensively like you should, and make sure you’re not over doing it on the volume. | |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Have you driven a 500cc? Modern supersport and adventure bikes have very quiet exhausts. Any loud exhaust you hear on your commute is usually somebody who put an aftermarket muffler on their 125cc bike. | |
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
| |
| ▲ | nedt 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If that's illegal than cars with closed windows would be illegal too. Even more so if they have the radio on. As a cyclist I keep having issues with car drivers not hearing anything happening outside of their vehicle (not a bell, not yelling, not a bicycle hooter). That's like wearing headphones or earplugs and still is considered normal. I'd love if everyone would be required to drive a cabrio. | | |
| ▲ | Gareth321 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Agreed. The people who complain about earphones while riding/driving/cycling are older and grew up in an era where they had advertisements on television warning people not to do that. The actual risk is fairly minimal. As you point out: modern cars are designed to be super quiet. Just use some common sense. | |
| ▲ | otherme123 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Cars are much more safe in a crash (surrounded with a steel frame, airbags, safety belt...) and also safer while driving (better mirrors, bigger and easier to see). I use the bike, and I know for a fact that almost any crash with a car means me in a coffin. I need all my senses at 100%, can't afford the luxury of listening to music or wear shorts for example. | | |
| ▲ | nedt 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Cars are only safer in a crash if you are inside the car. They are a big problem for anyone they crash into. That's why it's so very important that you see and hear everything happening around you. Why should the once with more mass and speed have the luxury of listening to music? | |
| ▲ | sda2 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | hence the term ‘cager’ - once you experience the phenomena from a bicycle or motorcycle it becomes obvious. |
|
| |
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | Der_Einzige 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Why stop people from winning Darwin awards? A lot of motorcyclists are the scum of society in other ways. Probably higher levels of domestic violence than the police. You want to wear airpods while on the motorcycle? If this is an unironic idea you are having, indulge! | | |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | GJim an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > A lot of motorcyclists are the scum of society in other ways. Speaking as a hairy-arsed biker, this comment makes me feel proud :-) | |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | In your opinion, how hard should somebody beat their wife to deserve an extremely painful death or being mutilated for a lifetime? If this is what you fancy, your local emergency services will probably welcome you to come along with them for a day, so that you can laugh and jeer at people while they are dying or dead. |
|
| |
| ▲ | throw0101c 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Agreed. Unrelated pro-tip: wearing them while riding a motorcycle. Reduces fatigue and transforms a rough experience into almost luxurious. Highly recommended. What kind of NRR rating, active or passive, do they have? I wear disposable foam plugs when riding, and haven't ever considered using the AirPods I have. I find the sound of the machine part of the experience of riding and wouldn't really want to get rid of it; I treat the moto sound as a kind of white noise that's different that everything else in my life (though this is with a short-ish commute, and not long-distance drudgery). If I wanted music or comms I would probably lean more towards ear plugs plus a Cardo/Sena unit. Or perhaps something with an official ANSI/CSA NRR rating, like Isotunes. | | |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Use a model of in-ear phones which let you still hear the low frequency rumbling of the motor. That's the pleasant part of the noise anyway. |
| |
| ▲ | Neywiny 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | When I got my (admittedly car) license they made it clear that's illegal. Hasn't stopped people from doing it but yeah don't. Maybe get a quieter exhaust | | |
| ▲ | t-3 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's illegal in a few places in the US, but not everywhere. It's definitely not illegal to put in a few kW of amplifiers and a few square feet of speakers, and often not even a problem to turn them all the way up and stop whole areas from hearing anything. | | |
| ▲ | mc32 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Those loudspeakers on wheels at volume are illegal in many places -what’s not happening is police caring enough to make arrests. Maybe other jurisdictions will take a cue from Las Vegas and begin enforcing laws to protect normal people from teenagers and adult idiots who still think they’re teenagers taking over streets. | | |
| ▲ | rlpb 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Arrests seem like overkill. Ask them to stop, issue a fine, whatever. Sure I get you're asking for any enforcement at all. But hyperbole has a polarizing effect on discourse we should try to avoid, IMHO. | | |
| ▲ | bloak 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes, I agree, but really we shouldn't even be comparing "arrests" and "fine". The latter is a punishment, and the former is a practical measure to prevent a future crime (such as destruction of evidence) or to prevent someone from evading justice (by destroying evidence, hiding or leaving the country, for example). Obviously some police forces do use arrests and searches and confiscation of "evidence" as a form of extrajudicial punishment but that shouldn't be allowed. | |
| ▲ | ChoGGi 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Arrest? No, but if you've done illegal modifications to your ride then being forced to get it from the impound lot seems fairer to me compared to a ticket you can pay at your convenience. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | infecto 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Earplugs are pretty common on a motorcycle. The issue is not the exhaust, its the wind which gets to damaging levels at pretty low speeds. | | |
| ▲ | quotz 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | wouldnt the helmet prevent that ? | | |
| ▲ | curiousObject 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The helmet protects the ears from direct airflow noise, but it also extends out into the high-speed airflow much more than ears do. The overall picture is that a helmet’s thick material blocks high frequencies. But it exacerbates and amplifies low frequency sound and white noise. As well, a helmet confuses the ear’s capabilities for identifying direction of sound that’s incoming If a helmet is helpful is a question of how fast the motorcycle is moving and what kinds of sounds the rider needs to hear. It’s complicated, but wearing no helmet might be safer at low speeds because the driver is more aware. No helmet, is undoubtedly not safer at high speed because brains are fragile Edit: a simple experiment for anyone is to put on a full size motorcycle helmet anywhere, and then you can understand how much your hearing is dampened by it. But I guess it’s probably no worse than the experience of someone driving a car, which is soundproof by design | |
| ▲ | infecto 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not at all. 30-40mph you can hit around 90 db inside the helmet. You’re not that much better with a helmet off either. Air moving over surfaces is loud, if not the helmet you are going to get it from the wind hitting your ears. There are certainly helmets that try to optimize for noise but there is no single one fix beyond ear plugs. |
|
| |
| ▲ | phinnaeus 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Fully agree that its dumb but even on my electric motorcycle at sub-highway speeds, the wind noise was the only thing I could hear. | | | |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You're revealing that you have never rode a motorbike with your comment. Riders need to use ear protection within the helmet unless they want to become deaf in the future, because of the wind noise. |
| |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | poncho_romero 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | So you're making noise for everyone else, while enjoying silence yourself? | | |
| ▲ | agentdax5 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | There’s this thing called wind that makes noise and also other vehicles on the road as well. Did you ever consider that? | | |
| ▲ | poncho_romero an hour ago | parent [-] | | You're right, my comment is unfair. In my defense, I've had my sleep interrupted several times recently by motorcyclists trying to make as much noise as possible, so I'm a little ornery ;) |
|
| |
| ▲ | wazoox 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In Europe it's strictly forbidden to wear headphones under the helmet. In case of a fall the in-ear device could cause grave injuries. Wearing a recent helmet and protective gloves with hardened knuckles is of course mandatory. But many helmets are equipped with bluetooth speakers and mike, of course. | | |
| ▲ | balfirevic 30 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > In Europe it's strictly forbidden to wear headphones under the helmet. No it's not. > protective gloves with hardened knuckles is of course mandatory No it's not. |
| |
| ▲ | asdfsa32 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Do you ride for economic reasons? | |
| ▲ | ginko 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Being able to hear your surroundings on a motorcycle or bicycle seems very important for safety to me. Filtering that out feels dangerous. | | |
| ▲ | t-3 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | On a pedal bike, it's very important because you are most likely to be hit by cars from behind. Motorcycles move much faster, and most riders wear helmets as well, already impacting hearing. The road noise and wind is very loud, try rolling down the window in a car on the freeway and imagine that on .your whole body. | | |
| ▲ | smilespray 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Had a close call with a cyclist going the same direction as me. She veered over in my direction as I was overtaking and was rather startled to see me, as she was wearing Airpods. | | |
| ▲ | ChoGGi 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Ah yes, the unintentionally suicidal, scariest part of being on the road. |
| |
| ▲ | hoppyhoppy2 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | >you are most likely to be hit by cars from behind Do you have a source for this info? It contradicts what I've read about the subject. | | |
| ▲ | t-3 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Just personal and anecdotal experience, and also that bike lanes usually move with traffic rather than against it. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Cthulhu_ 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In the Netherlands they banned wearing earplugs/headphones on bicycles for this reason (as well as using your device). Whether that's enforced / enforceable is another matter though. On a motorcycle you need hearing protection due to wind noise, but good plugs will filter out the louder noises, not so much important ones. | |
| ▲ | Fluorescence 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As a cyclist, I find sound such a poor signal I'd consider it optional. Too many threats are silent and sound is too late, misleadingly bounces of other surfaces and generally poorly correlated with significance. Safe cycling is all about vision. If you can't see it's safe, it's not. It isn't simply seeing imminent threats but predicting them e.g. identifying drivers that aren't paying attention and where a car could suddenly emerge like blind turnings, car doors, pedestrians and such, and countering with appropriate caution / road position. If you find noise useful, IMHO it means you aren't sufficiently aware of your environment. | | |
| ▲ | 9dev 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I cycle every day, and sound is definitely important; you need to plan ahead when you hear an ambulance approaching, for example. Plus, your brain processes things you see much better if there's a sound it can correlate the movement with. |
| |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There is practically nothing to hear that matters for your safety on a motorcycle at highway speeds. An ambulance you will hear even with headphones. | |
| ▲ | infecto 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ear plugs are recommended while riding a motorcycle. |
| |
| ▲ | wcrossbow 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sorry but no! On my corner of the world it's not allowed but more importantly it's dangerous. When riding your bike you must have all your senses fully engaged. First day I got on my new ride my dad gave me a piece of biker wisdom: You are the weakest and smallest vehicle () on the road, watch out and drive like nobody can see you or cares about you. () Bicycles and other light vehicles excluded | | |
| ▲ | _jw 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I ride with AirPods on, no content playing, just transparency mode. It cuts harsh wind noise, maintains 3D acoustics, and keeps me safer as a result. They’re a hearing aid for me in this case. | | |
| ▲ | Cthulhu_ 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | You may want to get some passive ear protection though, active noise canceling is not the same as noise protection. Unless you drive slowly, I find that driving at 60 kph max is still comfortable on the ears. |
| |
| ▲ | adammarples 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | No, riding for a long time without ear protection will damage your ears. Ear plugs at least are recommended. I am not hearing anything over the wind and engine noise anyway. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | _the_inflator 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Exactly. Noise cancelling is a treasure. And what I really like about them is the ease of use. The moment I start talking to someone, automagically the NC is paused as well as any audio you were listening to. It sounds so easy but is really running smoothly. Over time Apple really perfected the workings. This blend is what makes them so valuable for me. I don’t have to manually do anything, simply speak and interact without having to touch them. This is what bothered me really well, especially at work. Headset on, headset off - not anymore. And people now don’t feel neglected when you keep the Pods in your ear. Social reconditioning was part of the problem so to say. This tool is now accepted. Well deserved. I am buying another pair of the AirPods Pro. I want a bit of safety after I temporarily lost one ear pod - I felt so disturbed, suddenly not being able to enjoy freedom acoustically anymore. Just to make sure and switch between them. |
| |
| ▲ | basisword 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | >> The moment I start talking to someone, automagically the NC is paused as well as any audio you were listening to. This is one of those features I thought would be great and unfortunately had to disable in minutes. If you ever listen to music and sing along, even for a few seconds, the volume cuts because it thinks you're talking to someone. It's a shame. There's so many really great AirPods features and I feel like I've had to disable almost all of them for one reason or another. >> And people now don’t feel neglected when you keep the Pods in your ear. Social reconditioning was part of the problem so to say. This tool is now accepted. I think it'll get there eventually but it's still far from accepted in my opinion. Maybe if you're ordering at a Starbucks or something but if someone was trying to have a conversation with my with AirPods in I'd consider it rude. And even if it's becomes widely accepted I think it'll still have some mild stigma (equivalent to wearing sunglasses when having a conversation unless the sun is in your eyes). | | |
| ▲ | mylifeandtimes 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > The moment I start talking to someone, automagically the NC is paused as well as any audio you were listening to. When I'm listening to music, the music helps form my sense of time. It is deeply jarring to have the music pause for a few minutes and then start as though in 'music-land' no time had passed. I'd be happier if the music volume went to zero but the song/track kept progressing. |
| |
| ▲ | dd8601fn 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | They seem to have done so much work on the magic behaviors of the airpods (most of which I don’t have occasions to use) but they still work worse than a $35 pair of Ankers when it comes to just connecting, staying connected, and playing music without issue. They’re especially flaky if you’re using them with apples watch. I spent a few bucks on the pros, and the phone, and the watch, and the mini, and the tv, and the laptops. I shouldn’t be leaving that ecosystems ear buds in the drawer because the borderline disposable ones off amazon are the pair that “just work”. | | |
| ▲ | LollipopYakuza 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The "always works" is the only reason I am using Airpods. I have never had earbuds that are consistent in the way they connect in any circumstances. I have had Bose, high end Sony, Anker, and there are often times when you need it to connect in a rush and it forces you to shut down the device, the bluetooth on the phone, and waste 30 seconds that feel like 5 minutes. | | |
| ▲ | SenHeng an hour ago | parent [-] | | It works especially well when switching between devices, from iPhone to iPad to Mac and so on. I’ve never had the same seamless experience with other brands which often require you to re-pair just to switch. I used to be a huge Audio Technica fan but I can’t go back anymore. |
| |
| ▲ | phil21 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Complete opposite experience. Moved to the Apple ecosystem including the watch, and the seamlessness of how airpods work with them all had me give away all my other earbuds - even though the airpods do not have the best sound quality. The convenience of everything just working had me never reaching for anything else. I have plenty of complaints about Apple, but the Airpods experience is one the stickiest user experiences they have and would be one of the harder things to give up if I moved back to Android. | | | |
| ▲ | basisword 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Are you sure you haven't got a faulty pair? Mine switch seamlessly between devices. I bought a bluetooth speaker recently and using it is hell on earth comparatively. The number of times I have to find the device it last connected to and disconnect before I can connect the one I actually want is absurd. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | abdullahkhalids 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > (i.e. loud and busy environments with many strangers, often physically closer than comfortable) is unnatural to begin with. What is unnatural about this? We have plenty of anthropological evidence that humans have been doing massive festivals for at least many thousands of years i.e. people voluntarily gathering together with strangers in loud and busy environments with all sorts of sounds and smells. |
| |
| ▲ | bawolff 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | We still have festival type experiences: concerts, street festivals, gatherings in a park, church, etc. None of them particularly look like the bus. | |
| ▲ | albedoa an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ah yes, that natural many-thousand-year-old massive festival tradition we all know and love: the twice-daily subway ride. Good comparison. |
|
|
| ▲ | paganel 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > (i.e. loud and busy environments with many strangers, often physically closer than comfortable) is unnatural to begin with. That's very natural when it comes to life in an urban setting. Love it or hate it, we wouldn't have been here now (I'm talking from a civilizational pov) without us humans moving into the cities. |
| |
| ▲ | randallsquared 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think the argument is that the urban setting itself is ancestrally unnatural. Only a tiny proportion of humans lived in areas full of strangers in close proximity until the last hundred or two hundred years, which is not long enough for any related changes to spread widely given generation length. | | |
| ▲ | steve1977 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I think the argument is that the urban setting itself is ancestrally unnatural. That was my point, yes. |
| |
| ▲ | datsci_est_2015 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I would even argue that being surrounded by people is a natural state. Being isolated in a suburban home or an automobile is probably just as unnatural as being “surrounded by strangers”. Our ancient ancestors probably did all of the following within eyesight and earshot of around 40 people: - Eating
- Drinking
- Defecating
- Fornicating
- Bathing
- Exercising
Privacy and isolation are a very modern phenomenon. Even in the 19th century social norms around fornication and defecation and the privacy expected are much different than today.Edit: I’m also deeply fascinated by the ability of historical sociolinguistics to give us insight into cultural attitudes towards different topics. Consider the evolution of and the attitude towards the expletives “fuck” and “Jesus Christ!” | | |
| ▲ | steve1977 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | But those 40 people were likely more or less consistent and known to you and you also had direct or implied trust built up with them. That's fundamentally different from an anonymous mass of people in a city. I've seen and heard much more than 40 people (many of them different every day) before I even reach the office in the morning. | | |
| ▲ | datsci_est_2015 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Two extremes, equally unnatural, was simply my point. Either you have to trick your mind that the people who are going about the same rituals with you shoulder-to-shoulder are part of the same tribe as you: using the same bus, coffee shop, elevator. Or you have to trick your mind that being completely alone and going hours, sometimes days, without opening your mouth to communicate with someone or exercise the part of your brain that reads facial cues or even smell the hormones of another human (good or bad) is also somehow okay. Having done both (2 major metros, as well as suburban and WFH life), I’ve found the former to be easier for me, personally. I also find suburban and rural people to be generally more misanthropic than urban people, which of course has some selection bias. Exurban people seem to be the most misanthropic, by far (shout out Dallas-Fort Worth). But the point is, being surrounded by people day-in and day-out doesn’t seem to me to make people misanthropic on aggregate - otherwise cities would be an even worse place to exist. It’s the humans that make it bearable. |
|
| |
| ▲ | steve1977 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > we wouldn't have been here now (I'm talking from a civilizational pov) without us humans moving into the cities. What do you have in mind specifically? Edit: I'm aware that statistically, there's more inventions in metropolitan areas. However I'm not sure how much of that we can really attribute to causal effects that are unique to cities, especially today. Obviously, many universities are in metropolitan areas, but on the other hand, we have many tools for remote collaboration that we didn't have 200 years ago. So I'm not sure if cities are not an outdated concept. |
|
|
| ▲ | asdfsa32 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Strongly feeling a need to isolate yourself is not healthy and unnatural. |
| |
| ▲ | ekidd 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This varies enormously by where you live. I live out in the countryside. If I run into someone in the road, I will nod my head, maybe introduce myself, and maybe chat, if the other person is interested. (To be fair, I know about 80% of the people I see in the road.) This is normal behavior. Sometimes, two cars will pass each other and stop to talk. I have also lived in the city. If a stranger wants to talk to me in the city, either they're looking for directions (happy to help!), or they are deeply confused about appropriate social behavior in crowded spaces. In the latter case, I'm lucky if the stranger-with-no-boundaries merely wants to warn me about the dangers of the lizard people. So I've learned to ignore strangers. | | |
| ▲ | lelandfe 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > If a stranger wants to talk to me in the city, either they're looking for directions (happy to help!), or they are deeply confused about appropriate social behavior in crowded spaces A neat summary of the article. Talk to the old fogies in said city and they will saddle you with complaints of how people used to say good morning, how are you doing, etc. It didn’t used to be this way. Alas, we probably won’t be talking to the old fogies either. | | |
| ▲ | Gareth321 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | We used to have a much more rigid system of social enforcement - for good and for bad. People used to feel bad when they did things society disliked. It had real consequences. People knew what you did and you wouldn't be invited to events or be hired. The downside was that people who lived alternative lifestyles (such as those who were gay) were also ostracised. Unfortunately we threw the baby out with the bathwater, and decided that all actions are equally socially acceptable and there should be no social repercussions for living "differently." This is why I prefer smaller, culturally homogenous communities. We all understand the rules and we generally abide. | | |
| ▲ | kowbell 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > People knew what you did and you wouldn't be invited to events or be hired. I feel like this has almost never been true in big cities: it's impossible to know everyone and unless they made the news for what they did word wouldn't travel very far. Besides that, I also haven't observed what you're describing in both the smaller communities and the cities I've lived in. People absolutely do still get socially ostracized all the time in real life. |
|
| |
| ▲ | asdfsa32 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You're just taking the Western code of social conduct as "normal". Human interaction is completely normal and natural. | | |
| ▲ | zamadatix 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Isolating yourself in certain situations isn't the same as not having human interaction and sticking 10 million humans in a small area and expecting them to always interact with all of the others is in no way normal or natural. Sometimes interacting with ~100ish people (within an order of magnitude) over your month is natural. Too many is both exhausting and diluting of the meaning, too few is lonely and over isolating. | |
| ▲ | TheRealDunkirk 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You're trying to follow an out-of-date map. Our technology-infused growth of the past 50 years has produced more widespread mental illness and psycopathy than someone in the 80's could have even imagined. At this point in our societal evolution, you cannot assume that HUMANS THEMSELVES are either normal or natural. | |
| ▲ | steve1977 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Human interaction, sure.
Human interaction with complete strangers, 10 inches away from you, enclosed in a metal tube you cannot escape from easily... not so much. |
|
| |
| ▲ | vitally3643 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Just because you personally disagree with something does not make it a universal wrong. Thinking so is immature and unwise behavior. | | |
| ▲ | asdfsa32 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | For a non-solitary species that requires almost 2 decades for self-sufficiency, isolation is not a question of personal opinion, it is fundamental. | | |
| ▲ | steve1977 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | But we are talking about a temporary and situational isolation here.
I'm not wearing Airpods when I meet family or friends. | |
| ▲ | dfssdfsdfsdf343 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well, let's just say my needs changed a bit over the next two decades.. yours did not? |
|
| |
| ▲ | brianleb 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is a very un-nuanced and combative take on a lot of people's lives. It reminds me of it being socially acceptable for the extrovert to say to the introvert, "Why don't you talk more?" while it is not acceptable for the introvert to say to the extrovert, "Why don't you talk less?" | |
| ▲ | Gareth321 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As they explain, living in such close proximity to thousands of strangers is also not how we evolved. The earphones are an adaptive strategy. Like masks on public transport during pandemics. We don't have to adapt to modern society, but we can make it more pleasant in various ways, depending on our preferences. | |
| ▲ | Cthulhu_ 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'd agree in general terms, but I don't think city life or existing in busy and noisy spaces is either. Isolating as described (by putting on noise-canceling earphones) is a way to manage and reduce sensory input to something within your own control. Some people are comfortable with that, some people (say they) are used to it, but a lot of people find that blocking it out works better for them. | |
| ▲ | kashunstva 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > …not healthy and unnatural I don’t think you can say this categorically without taking context and a myriad of facets of one’s socio-emotional situation into consideration. | |
| ▲ | tokai 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Writing comments on HN is also completely unnatural. |
|