| ▲ | Neywiny 6 hours ago |
| When I got my (admittedly car) license they made it clear that's illegal. Hasn't stopped people from doing it but yeah don't. Maybe get a quieter exhaust |
|
| ▲ | t-3 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's illegal in a few places in the US, but not everywhere. It's definitely not illegal to put in a few kW of amplifiers and a few square feet of speakers, and often not even a problem to turn them all the way up and stop whole areas from hearing anything. |
| |
| ▲ | mc32 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Those loudspeakers on wheels at volume are illegal in many places -what’s not happening is police caring enough to make arrests. Maybe other jurisdictions will take a cue from Las Vegas and begin enforcing laws to protect normal people from teenagers and adult idiots who still think they’re teenagers taking over streets. | | |
| ▲ | rlpb 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Arrests seem like overkill. Ask them to stop, issue a fine, whatever. Sure I get you're asking for any enforcement at all. But hyperbole has a polarizing effect on discourse we should try to avoid, IMHO. | | |
| ▲ | bloak 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes, I agree, but really we shouldn't even be comparing "arrests" and "fine". The latter is a punishment, and the former is a practical measure to prevent a future crime (such as destruction of evidence) or to prevent someone from evading justice (by destroying evidence, hiding or leaving the country, for example). Obviously some police forces do use arrests and searches and confiscation of "evidence" as a form of extrajudicial punishment but that shouldn't be allowed. | |
| ▲ | ChoGGi 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Arrest? No, but if you've done illegal modifications to your ride then being forced to get it from the impound lot seems fairer to me compared to a ticket you can pay at your convenience. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | infecto 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Earplugs are pretty common on a motorcycle. The issue is not the exhaust, its the wind which gets to damaging levels at pretty low speeds. |
| |
| ▲ | quotz 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | wouldnt the helmet prevent that ? | | |
| ▲ | curiousObject 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The helmet protects the ears from direct airflow noise, but it also extends out into the high-speed airflow much more than ears do. The overall picture is that a helmet’s thick material blocks high frequencies. But it exacerbates and amplifies low frequency sound and white noise. As well, a helmet confuses the ear’s capabilities for identifying direction of sound that’s incoming If a helmet is helpful is a question of how fast the motorcycle is moving and what kinds of sounds the rider needs to hear. It’s complicated, but wearing no helmet might be safer at low speeds because the driver is more aware. No helmet, is undoubtedly not safer at high speed because brains are fragile Edit: a simple experiment for anyone is to put on a full size motorcycle helmet anywhere, and then you can understand how much your hearing is dampened by it. But I guess it’s probably no worse than the experience of someone driving a car, which is soundproof by design | |
| ▲ | infecto 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not at all. 30-40mph you can hit around 90 db inside the helmet. You’re not that much better with a helmet off either. Air moving over surfaces is loud, if not the helmet you are going to get it from the wind hitting your ears. There are certainly helmets that try to optimize for noise but there is no single one fix beyond ear plugs. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | phinnaeus 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Fully agree that its dumb but even on my electric motorcycle at sub-highway speeds, the wind noise was the only thing I could hear. |
| |
|
| ▲ | carlosjobim 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| You're revealing that you have never rode a motorbike with your comment. Riders need to use ear protection within the helmet unless they want to become deaf in the future, because of the wind noise. |
