Remix.run Logo
soared 3 hours ago

Is this how the US falls behind? Missing technological improvements due to blind disagreements with Chinese/etc, combined with inability to update infrastructure? (Unclear how/why but datacenters being stood up so quickly seems like an exception to US’s bad construction)

1970-01-01 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In a word, yes. In a few words, yes that's the entire situation summary. No long term strategy exists for the entire country.

markus_zhang 3 hours ago | parent [-]

There might be no industrial long term planning, but I think it’s because the US operates in a different mode — financial (late) Capitalism.

pjc50 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Data centers are (a) private not public and (b) throwing money at the problem on the assumption of being able to capture a significant chunk of all white collar incomes.

And they're running into the public issues already, such as lack of large power transformer availability and noise complaints from trying to generate their own power.

Mashimo 3 hours ago | parent [-]

But gas pumps / electric charging stations are also private.

jmyeet 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

China is what happens when you put scientists and engineers in charge [1][2].

20 years ago China had a single high speed rail link in Shanghai going to the airport. Now they have more than 30,000 miles of high speed rail where they've bootstrapped all the civil engineering, they make their own trains, etc. The system handles over 4 billion trips annually and they built the entire thing for an estimated $900 billion [3], which is now less than the US spends on the military in a single year.

Every $1 you spend on the military is $1 you don't spend on housing, healthcare, education, roads, trains and other infrastructure. Eisenhower warned about this 60+ years ago [4].

[1]: https://en.clickpetroleoegas.com.br/All-of-China%27s-preside...

[2]: https://www.economist.com/china/2023/03/09/many-of-chinas-to...

[3]: https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2152581/huge-668bn-high...

[4]: https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/president-dwigh...

raw_anon_1111 2 hours ago | parent [-]

On a semi related note, military leaders in the US have been warning about the dangers of the American deficit and have a long history of trying to cut waste by getting rid of weapons programs and military bases they don’t need but are constantly blocked by the civilian leadership in Congress because of the job loss.

himata4113 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I mean if you really think about it china already has or is on the verge of:

- energy independence

- ASML level microchip production

- the SOTA of AI

- citizens that accept surveilence and lack of privacy

- strong local manufacturing

- eastern world support

- yuan recognized as a stable world currency

But they do suffer from issues as well:

- Aging population

- Autocracy (or well, one party system)

- Brain drain (better funding and security in the US and Europe, US has managed to alienate a lot of very promising figures so it's closer to just Europe, but capital markets in Europe are still hit and miss)

It's completely understandable why US is freaking out, china's future still looks a lot more promising than the one US find themselves in.

giwook 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> citizens that accept surveilence and lack of privacy

It's certainly not to China's extent, but is America really that opposed to surveillance and lack of privacy?

Yes, we tend to raise a huge stink when evidence of such comes to the surface.

But actions speak louder than words, and through our actions we already largely accept surveillance and a lack of privacy.

Everyday consumer apps are some of the worst offenders. Our social media apps listen to us, Amazon Ring doorbells are allegedly accessed by ICE (though Amazon denies it), Flock cameras abound (not to mention the fact they're poorly secured so who knows who else is watching other than the municipalities Flock contracts with), companies own much of our data and sell them to myriad unknown sources on a whim. There are too many examples to list.

No, it's not as severe as China. But we're certainly not trending in the right direction.

himata4113 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The american government pretends to care, but the moment you look deeper (snowden leaks), it's clear that they don't. But the fact still stands, the population is mostly against surveilance while chinese just keep their head down.

giwook an hour ago | parent [-]

They have to keep their head down for fear it will get cut off (figuratively speaking, mostly). I doubt the majority of Chinese civilians are happy to be in a repressed state such as the one they're in.

And unfortunately it's pretty clear the current administration is working hard to enact a similar chilling effect on free speech. It's hard to see how we avoid becoming a similarly surveilled and repressed state if there were a third term.

himata4113 an hour ago | parent [-]

I mean I didn't say it was a good thing. It's a benefit (to the government) that it is already widespread and accepted as part of life.

est 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> citizens that accept surveilence and lack of privacy

citizens had no choice.

fmbb 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Neither do US and European citizens. We seem to be accepting the same amount of surveillance and lack of privacy still.

shaneos 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Citizens always have a choice. The cost can be terrible, but there’s always a choice

raw_anon_1111 2 hours ago | parent [-]

What is that “choice”? Surely you aren’t like those yokels in the south that think a “militia” running in the woods can take on the the US military or even a decent SWAT force

Johanx64 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You're presuming that if they had a choice, they wouldn't accept it.

The reality is that chinese goverment is - overall - delivering results. People will accept things that bring good outcomes.

There's also upsides from the surveilence and the way things are done in China which makes it way more resilient from outside influence and disruptive bad actors.

Now I don't want the same things in my country, but it suits China to some extent.

pjc50 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

China still has capital controls, so the RMB cannot be a world currency when you can't freely move it in and out of China.

himata4113 2 hours ago | parent [-]

doesn't change the fact that their next 'plan' will likely include expanding yuan influnce across the world.

duskdozer 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

How much more surveillance and lack of privacy is there than the US? The US also has

- surveilled cities and less dense places through doorbell cams - surveilled digital communications - social credit scores (try getting a bank account if you've opted out of things like lexisnexis etc)

BLKNSLVR 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Data Centre builds are being managed by the tech bro companies aren't they? Don't they follow a much different set of rules than 'public' construction? (for better and worse).

dyauspitr 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It’s a purposeful hamstringing of EV so the GOP’s oil and gas supporters can make 3-5 more years of money.

skippyboxedhero 3 hours ago | parent [-]

China's low level of corruption wins again

raddan 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Unfortunately, a corrupt autocracy with a strategy seems more likely to win the capitalist arms race than a wealthy but feckless democracy. It’s only slightly ironic that said autocracy calls itself communist.

skippyboxedhero 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Functioning democracies are inherently authoritarian. The simplistic, textbook definition of dictatorship, which in the West is generally used to define the foreign other, has no basis in reality.

This vision holds because it presupposes that the only thing people care about is political freedom, when in reality there can only ever be one political class and political freedom is largely about some other political class trying to take control because the current system doesn't favour them in some way.

Western democracies, at their worst, have a largely permanent political class who is elected every year under the pretext of democratic legitimacy. Eastern dictatorshpis, at their best, have a government that is continuously rotated to ensure competent implementation gaining legitimacy from delivery.

Both are contextual and the position along the autocracy axis largely depends on implementation. Whether people can actually vote is irrelevant (Europe is generally one of the worst examples of this, elections constantly, most election produce governments that polls under 20% within months...it is very strange that people call this democracy).

SirFatty 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

hshdhdhj4444 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The Chinese are selling their EVs all over the world.

There are credible American auto enthusiasts that have got these cars and have been using them in the. US.

The superiority of Chinese EVs isn’t propaganda.

The gas pumps maybe are just a ruse but we know they are operating in China since unlike the US auto industry the Chinese one is incredibly competitive so if BYD was lying about their gas pumps the nearly 100 other competitors would have called them out

unethical_ban 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Put political freedom aside. Does China not have massive high speed train networks, the best EVs on the planet, the most renewable energy growth on the planet and a competitive domestic AI industry, and hugely more engineering graduates per year than the US?

Their trajectory is incredible, and I don't see what burying ones head in the sand does to help the US or Europe or the democratic societies of the world get/stay ahead.

drstewart 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's how Europe falls behind, you mean.

Why do they always get left out of the comparisons? Because they're so far behind anything it would be an insult to include them?

orwin 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Europe is third since the 2000s. The pushed the Euro to try to limit it (and from the mouth of someone who was present when they pushed, it was also caused by the black Wednesday of 92, the attacks on currencies increased, and the cost to rebuff them too).

And yes, basically, no one should include europe in the comparison until US oil fields are depleted, and even then at best it would be a race for the second place. You can't compete without gas and oil or a huge manufacturing lead, and europe don't have any, and only have specific subset of manufacturing (basically sensors, electronics, avionics, optics, and handmade clothing) that isn't workforce-intensive, nor resource-intensive.

phatfish 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe, but BMW are at least trying. https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/electric-cars/electric-3-...

At least the Chinese tech will be available to European consumers, nothing says insecure like pretending a competitor doesn't exist.

giwook 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think this is probably because Europe is considered part of "the West".

Markoff 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

you can buy Chinese phones/cars in EU, so we don't fall behind

though in 3.5 months they are gonna ban EU consumers from buying cheap things directly from AliExpress and groom July 1st you will have to pay 3EUR for each ordered item, including that 1EUR screen protector, because it's much better when you can feed some useless middleman than saving money, thanks EU!

temp8830 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> you can buy Chinese phones/cars in EU, so we don't fall behind

With that logic, every programmer on this site should spend as much time as possible on Facebook. This will make their salary equal to that of a Meta employee!

Consuming something is not the same as being able to produce it.

renewiltord 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

For the majority of Americans, “the US falling behind” is not something they care about. The principal thing they care about is not whether the whole is ruined but whether they have an appropriate portion.

An American would prefer that a field make 1 unit of rice if everyone got 1/n units. This is different from cultures where the preference is that you maximize your wellbeing (older America) so that if someone could figure out how to make the field make 10 units of rice, it’s okay if he makes 8 units and everyone else gets 2/n units.

The modern American cultural optimum aims to minimize |x_i - x_j| while growth cultures attempt to maximize x_i. An ironic reversal of roles.

raddan 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That’s a rather tall argument given that the US is currently experiencing historic income inequality [1].

[1] https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/exploding-wealth-inequality-u...

skippyboxedhero 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

America is also, fundamentally, a divided country where people disagree over basic things (such as the distribution of rice) and there is a massive industry dedicated to amplifying that division.

On almost every topic, the discussion will turn to what that other evil part of society is doing to disrupt the good guys. If people are arguing about how to house people or stop crime (both basic issues), you will never move from these topics.

Most visible example is public infrastructure, middle-income countries in SE Asia have better infrastructure than the US (and most of Europe)...this makes no sense within the prevailing political/economic/social context in the West, it should just be totally impossible.

pbronez 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe. Agree that zero-sum thinking sucks. You gotta grow the pie. But. You also have to share the big pie.

In your example, the current crisis can be represented as:

A field exists and produces 1 unit.

A financial entity buys the field and applies unsustainable methods to increase production 100 units, keep 99.5 of them, distributes 0.5/n. People are pissed that they’re getting half of what they used to despite incredible productivity. The people elect a leader to fix the situation. The leader confronts the financial entity, and returns to the people with 4 units in their pocket and excuses.

hshdhdhj4444 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

America has a genuinely crazy side.

No other country in the world has anything like the Republicans in the US, who are the only major political party in the world to oppose the existence of man made climate change.

There may be political parties in the rest of the world that say that the cost of tackling climate change is too high, but they don’t dispute the factual reality of it.

The Republicans were in this position between about 2008 and 2014 when their leaders were McCain and Romney, but Romney’s lack of insanity inspired a massive backlash within the crazy part of American society that then made Donald Trump their primary winner in 2016 as a repudiation to the not completely insane Republican leadership.

I know HN loves to pretend that the Republicans and the Democrats are just two sides of the same coin, but this can be shown to be objectively false by comparing to political parties abroad. Democrats are a normal European center left to center right party with all the flaws that brings with them.

The Republicans are now a party of insanity.