Remix.run Logo
fzil 4 hours ago

Man the moral degradation is off the charts. Prediction markets are easily the worst things to grace the internet by far and its not even close.

red_admiral 34 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

They've certainly turned out different than Scott Alexander predicted, once the markets were opened up to people who are not in the wider rationalist community.

Not foreseeing the amount of sports betting that would take place, is kind of a failure of rationality in the first place, and I say this as someone who absolutely respects the community in general.

MattGaiser 13 minutes ago | parent [-]

Interacting with others outside the rationalist community has always been their weak spot.

Zigurd 6 minutes ago | parent [-]

I would go with rationalism being a delusion of tech bros rather than blaming a failure of rationalism on those lumpen proles inventing silly sports propositions.

SpicyLemonZest 3 minutes ago | parent [-]

Do you know someone in particular who blamed sports betting on "lumpen proles"? It kinda seems like you're making up a person to get mad at here.

Waterluvian 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think the idea behind a prediction market is pretty interesting, especially from an economics dataset point-of-view. And there's probably a lot of fun, harmless things to bet on. eg. "Will Conan lead an extravagent musical number at the Oscars?"

But we're in an era of less and less responsible government oversight, so the whole thing naturally gets ruined if there's no guardrails to prevent peoeple without souls or the accompanying morals from participating in ugly, greedy ways.

Though I'm also likely to adopt the idea that the absenece of competent government is an effect, not a cause, of some societies having had to mortgage their souls.

Edit: I mean, yeah, if you're stuck being fixated on pessimism and greed, of course there's a lot of ways this can be exploited. I just think that in its more pure, good faith form, the idea of letting the market tell you odds of things happening is pretty fascinating. I'm sure there's a whole body of economics on this idea, that it might be a better predictor of events than other models. I had fun betting $5 here and there on video game announcements/awards. (though for me betting is a game, not a financial strategy)

Balgair 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Friend of a friend does announcing online.

Like, you pay him a little (<= $20 ?) and he'll announce your game of NBA-2K26 on twitch. He does have a good radio voice. A good way to make a little in the off hours.

So, he got a gig to announce the opening of loot boxes at some show. I think it was Fortnite loot boxes. I guess it gives you the total value of the loot box spree you opened. So, 2 people buy a bunch of loot boxes, then open them up, then whoever has the higher value wins and takes both of the people's total haul.

Sounds like a strange thing to have to announce, but sure the guy says you pay and I'll say.

No, it was gambling for the watchers on polymarket [0]. People were betting on who would have the higher value. 'Like a lot of people' he said.

That's High Card. "A lot of" people were betting on games of High Card, essentially.

You know, shuffle a deck, draw 2 cards, whoever has the higher value one wins. Repeat.

It is the most Degenerate form of gambling out there. There is no skill, no human factor, no nothing. Just pure random numbers.

My lord, what a plague we have unleashed. We'll be dealing with this for decades.

[0] no idea if polymarket and the like do things this quickly, but he said they were gambling somehow with another site off of Twitch and then waved his phone, implying you can access it that easily.

virgil_disgr4ce an hour ago | parent [-]

Reminds me of the cheap bets casino from National Lampoons Vegas Vacation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byfewcZsug4

ipaddr 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The insiders ruin a market like this. Unlike in sports/stocks there are no rules / punishment for insider trading.

kasey_junk 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Prediction markets as a useful tool are predicated on insider information. The punters without edge are the bait incentivizing the insiders.

And in the US prediction markets are regulated like commodities which have much more lax insider rules, because again, insider trading is the point.

cjonas 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

How is it useful when what we are seeing is insiders place massive bets immediately before the event resolves. Does gaining this information a few hours early provide value to society that offsets the impact of normalizing gambling and attaching incentives to bad outcomes of war, politics, etc.

hrimfaxi 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> insider trading is the point

Says who?

Ajedi32 3 hours ago | parent [-]

It's in the name: Prediction market. The point is to predict an outcome, insiders will naturally be better at that than non-insiders.

Though I think where things start to get a bit more insidious is when the "insiders" have access not merely to inside information, but the ability to change the outcome. That type of insider trading should be banned IMO because it works against the purpose of prediction markets as a tool. (Though the extent to which banning that is possible though is debatable.)

aleph_minus_one 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If some specific prediction market can easily be manipulated by someone with insider knowledge, you better should not gamble in it.

lotsofpulp 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>And there's probably a lot of fun, harmless things to bet on. eg. "Will Conan lead an extravagent musical number at the Emmys?"

I cannot fathom what could be fun about that.

relaxing 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Fun to lose to insiders on the production team?

iso1631 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't know why you'd ever put money into something like that. Anyone working on the show will know the answer

KeplerBoy 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Kinda legal insider trading, I guess.

Waterluvian 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean, what's fun about my specific example? Guaranteed money.

croon 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

By that definition all terrible aspects of the concept are the same as the fun.

relaxing 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Conan hosted the Oscars.

mlsu an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Moral degradation? Buddy think about how much money can be made here. Eye on the ball. Try to think about what's truly important in life: making money by _monetizing every difference of opinion_.

https://gizmodo.com/kalshi-ceo-says-he-wants-to-monetize-any...

tomtomtom777 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Absolutely horrifying.

Today they are bribing journalists to report on a bomb.

Tomorrow they will be bribing armies to bomb.

This needs to be banned.

cannonpr 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It can look bad, but this is just an aspect of human behavior en masse that we don’t normally get to see. A long time ago there was an incident on a military base. A man had gotten up on a building to commit suicide, and while the officers tried to convince him not to jump, the drafted soldiers gathered underneath and started chanting “jump, jump” because of a rule that said witnessing the suicide of a fellow soldier cut down their draft length. Anyway, point being, situations where group A can benefit by harming group B are always problematic with large groups of people. The internet has produced novel and worse things than this.

victorbjorklund 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Sounds like a urban legend.

happytoexplain 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>It can look bad, but this is just an aspect of human behavior

Why "can look", "but", "just"?

Ajedi32 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think GP is saying it's not the prediction market that's bad, but human nature itself. The prediction market just makes it more visible.

tclancy 3 hours ago | parent [-]

If we ignore that people are literally profiting from running the prediction market that happens to make it visible and giving incentive to uninvolved parties to have a STRONG OPINION about any type of event for the purpose of gambling, yeah, I guess that's a point.

cannonpr 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Because it’s one of many events that violates our belief in our selves more than the nature of human society and man as a social animal based on studies of what we actually are.

echoangle 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It’s not even close to being the worst thing in my opinion. There are people driven into suicide by blackmailing them over social media and people selling murder for hire on the Darknet.

Some death threats are pretty harmless compared to that, assuming that nothing actually happens (which is pretty likely in my opinion).

Jeff_Brown 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

As someone who has received death threats, I can tell you, the comfort from the fact that they're usually not acted on, while real, is not huge.

echoangle 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I am sorry for that and I can see that it’s bad, but the internet just has a lot of things that are even worse.

manphone 3 hours ago | parent [-]

That’s not an explanation or an excuse at all.

echoangle 3 hours ago | parent [-]

What do you mean? The claim was that prediction markets are the worst thing on the internet and I mentioned some things that are worse. What else is there to explain?

lynx97 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It is a valueable learning experience. Especially if you are naiv enough like me, to actually give police a call after someone threatened you with death. Pretty sobering when the guy on the other end of the line just flips you off with "And what do you think are we supposed to do about it now?" Thats when you learn that some of your problems are pretty much imagined :-) and that there is a difference beween TV and real life...

mattmaroon 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah CSAM is worse.

But I think we can all agree there are a lot of negative effects of the new world where online gaming is without limits and government intervention is needed to some extent.

loeg 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sports betting seems worse? Easily lumped in to the same category, though.

onlyrealcuzzo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

By far?!

There's a very long list.

3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
dominicrose 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It still bothers me that it's banned in France, as many types of bets are. It's clear that nobody should risk money they can't afford to lose because that's what causes people to panic and behave in unpredictable ways. There should be ways to limit usage instead of a full ban or full authorization.

coole-wurst 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think CP is worse. Personally. Different priorities I guess.

laurentiurad 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

it's a hyperbole dude. It accelerates the moral decay of a society, and the barriers for entry are very low. The one you mentioned is straight illegal and punishable in any jurisdiction across the globe.

ambicapter 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That existed before the internet.

azan_ 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I’d say that propaganda is much worse and more harmful and it’s not even close. Nowadays like 50% of population believes that covid vaccines are harmful because of bullshit they read on the internet. Prediction market is not even in top 100 harmful things related to internet in my opinion.

manphone 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We can walk and chew gum at the same time, the government can regulate thousands or millions of different types of things at the same time. It doesn’t make sense to say there’s stuff on the Internet that is worse therefore we cannot it should not do anything about it.

ipaddr 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Or from the death of family and friends.

swingboy 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Easily the worst thing and it’s not even close? Really?

mathisfun123 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Lol I guess you weren't around in the goatse days

rich_sasha 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Does it degrade humananity or shine a spotlight on what was already a terrible part thereof? I'd say the latter.

So we don't want that spotlight (or maybe do as a honeypot operation) but I'm not as of yet concerned for the effect they have on humanity.

applfanboysbgon 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Humans will engage in exactly as terrible and selfish behaviour as society lets them get away with, without fail. Murder, rape, theft are the way of nature. We don't need a spotlight to know this. The only thing we can do is use our collective power as social species to shut down each type of harmful individual behaviour, which does not solve such behaviours completely but does drastically reduce them.