| ▲ | pelagicAustral 6 hours ago |
| Refreshing. No more Teams? Sounds like a dream... Of all the crapware I am forced to work with, Teams really pushes the envelope in every single negative way conceivable. I think I have more love for SharePoint than Teams, and that is a massive concession. |
|
| ▲ | e12e 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Heh, now that our team has standardized on Teams rather than Zulip (so that we suffer/connect with the rest of the org whom are stuck in MS land) - and I've been given the chance to use Teams for a while - it really is worse than I initially thought. Which means it's time to look for alternative clients. I ws hoping for something like WeeSlack: https://github.com/wee-slack/wee-slack But all I found was: https://github.com/btp/teams-cli https://github.com/EionRobb/purple-teams Are there really no good Teams clients? Doesn't have to plug in to WeeChat or be a TUI... But something? |
| |
| ▲ | dijit 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You'd understand why there's no even half-decent clients for Teams if you ever tried to write a bot in Teams. That's just a pure lesson in pain. Webhooks work, but proper bots are borderline impossible; at least without giving you the feeling that you'd rather pull your own teeth out with pliers. | | |
| ▲ | exceptione 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sorry to hear. Pulling teeth with pliers on-premise has been out of support for a while. Please contact our sales team if you haven't tried our Pliers Copilot 365 For Teams and Dentists offering yet. It solves any problems you might currently experience. | | |
| |
| ▲ | canpan 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I actually had a look. Now you can get messages and stuff from MS Graph. The situation is better than a few years ago when only very useless Teams APIs were available. But the available APIs still suck. For example there is none to just get all recent notifications. I don't know if teams itself has access to more and better apis? If not that would explain a lot. | | |
| ▲ | TOMDM 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't.
The number of times I've heard the notification sound, gotten a toast while in the middle of something, and then been unable to find what the hell that notification was for, because some other device I'm logged in on has helpfully marked it read. Then begins the hunt through chats, meeting chats, group chats, channel chats and the notification pane (which doesn't show every type of notification!?) to find what it was. Absolutely maddening. |
| |
| ▲ | Flere-Imsaho 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | https://european-alternatives.eu/alternative-to/microsoft-te... | |
| ▲ | internet_points 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm in the same boat and I am this close to just torching the mainsail | |
| ▲ | wizzwizz4 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Even authenticating to Teams is a herculean task. Microsoft's official APIs seem purpose-built to prevent people from writing proper Teams interfaces, and attempting to replicate their proprietary SSO flow is extremely painful. (In theory, you could hook into it by starting a fresh web browser at the appropriate login page, waiting for the appropriate redirects, and then harvesting the relevant cookies, but that's a really ugly solution, and it already represents a lot of invested work.) |
|
|
| ▲ | tartoran 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Teams is the bane of my existence. Oh well, one of them at least and am forced to use it for the time being. Europeans may get lucky with some sane software or get something even worse than Teams. It remains to be seen how they do. If their software is starting to get better, perhaps US software will get better too because they can no longer justify the junk they're pumping out on us. |
| |
| ▲ | pelagicAustral 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > get something even worse than Teams I'm not sure that's actually possible, you know... | | |
| ▲ | tartoran 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I hope for the best for Europeans but until I see results I'm not sure what they're capable of. | | |
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I guess we could concoct something made out of PHP4/5 and jQuery and use Xampp stack, to get something worse. Or wait, I have it! We build it on top of MS Excel! |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | randusername 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The Zen of Teams is that Teams is so clunky it cannot be Slack. Without threads, there is no breach of thread-etiquette. When "channels" are so awkward, nobody uses them. Then there is no constant deluge of middle-age folks creating a Facebook out of work, needing to be reminded that the photos channel is for business-photos, not pictures of their kids. When emoji support is limited, nobody has to police people pushing the boundaries of what emojis are appropriate. The software is baffling. But I like it that way. |
| |
| ▲ | wilsonnb3 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can upload custom emoji to teams, most businesses just turn it off |
|
|
| ▲ | rurp 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've had to start using Teams more lately and it is indeed as terrible as I'd heard. The other day I needed to copy a number of items from an ongoing chat. Seems like an extremely simple and normal thing, but every time I hover over a message a popup jumps up with emoji reactions that partially covers the text I'm trying to copy. Trying to move quickly, I kept accidentally "reacting" to messages instead of double clicking the text. To make matters worse there's no way to disable this "feature"! Why?! Teams is supposed to be a professional workplace tool from one of the biggest software companies in the world, but it feels like something a high schooler coded up for fun. Weirdly Discord, a platform explicitly meant for gamers, is a more useful chat tool. I don't like Discord at all, but it's better than Teams. |
|
| ▲ | kenjackson 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I have to admit, I have almost no problems with Teams. The one big issue I had was performance when screen sharing. But I got a new laptop and this problem went away. Seems so odd that so many people have major problems with it, while I feel like within my workgroup there are almost no problems to speak of. |
| |
| ▲ | andix 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This was discussed before: if your Windows computer doesn't have a valid HEVC license installed, then Teams falls back to software encoding and performs horrible. Most manufacturers include the license, but not all. It's also only 99 cents on the Microsoft store (which might be unavailable on enterprise managed devices) | | |
| ▲ | dijit 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | That: and microsoft routes all calls through their servers. Fine if you live near a datacenter. In Sweden though, you go through France. Not ideal. |
| |
| ▲ | delecti 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How extensively do you use it? When my team was just using it for meetings and the attached chats, it did actually work completely fine. When broader orgs started pushing more communications through it (the "teams" in teams, and all the weird chat room/forums that entails) all of the rough edges became very apparent. All of that is just a shockingly disorganized mess. | |
| ▲ | pjmlp 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | One day they will discover threaded conversions. | | |
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | And then we will get rid of them again, because some suits are telling us that we don't actually want them, that they are "complicated", we must trust them and that recursive data types are too hard to get right. Let's all write SMS again. Or better yet, send fax. Some engineers will facepalm super hard but won't be listened to, as usual, and we will enter the next cosmic age of self-inflicted suffering. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | tedggh 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What’s so bad about Teams that makes it so hated? I used it lately and often to work with a customer and I don’t find anything terrible about it, other than some minor usability annoyances like phantom chat notifications once in a while. But overall it does what it’s supposed to do, get on a video call, share your screen and share files over channels. The transcript feature seems to work well too. I’m not amazed by it, but I don’t see anything to hate either. I guess it is one of those tools I don’t have a strong opinion about. |
| |
| ▲ | dijit 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | "I don't have an issue with it" tells me you've never used anything else. Have you tried Slack? Zulip? Mattermost? Fucking... IRC from 1988? Teams isn't just mediocre, it's aggressively hostile to basic usability. The camera bar sits at the top of the window, directly blocking where you're supposed to position your camera for eye contact. Chat organisation is broken: you get duplicate groups because the order people were added matters somehow. Notifications phantom in and out. Reactions are buried in an activity feed. Search is useless. You can't reliably paste text without major formatting issues. The mobile app logs you out randomly and doesn’t tell you unless you manually check it. Desktop notifications don't sync with read state. Files uploaded to chat don't appear in the Files tab. The "new Teams" broke half the features that worked in classic Teams. Presence status is a coin flip. Audio settings reset themselves between calls. Screen sharing has a 50/50 chance of sharing the wrong window. The difference between a chat and a channel is arbitrary and confusing. You can't edit messages older than a few hours. Threading is bolted on and barely works. Performance is inexcusable. Multiple gigabytes of RAM to display text messages and lag constantly on modern hardware. How do you make a chat application lag? It's rendering text, not computing fluid dynamics. Opening the application takes 30 seconds on an SSD. Switching between chats stutters. Typing has input delay. The real problem isn't that Teams is terrible. It's that "it technically functions" has become an acceptable standard. When you've never experienced better, "it works" seems fine. But Teams is what happens when a monopoly position means you don't have to care about quality. Microsoft has unlimited resources and still ships this. Even Skype for Business was more stable, and in Skype for Business you couldn't reliably select text. That's how low the bar is. | | |
| ▲ | mystifyingpoi 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > and lag constantly on modern hardware This. Opening a chat for the first time in the morning consistently takes 5-10 seconds. Opening subsequent ones takes 2-3 seconds. That is, if they contain plain text. If not, UI keps reflowing and jumping while thumbnails and silly gifs are loaded async, so you cannot even reliably click. | |
| ▲ | tedggh an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I have used at least Skype, Meet/Chat, Slack, Teams and Discord, plus some other niche apps I can’t remember. In Discord, I like the ability to share user screens concurrently and the way you can just jump on a channel and have an impromptu meeting without much ceremony. But I have seen only one case of Discord in a corporate environment. My use cases are simple, video calls, screen sharing, file sharing and chat with mentions and code snippets, once in a while a survey to pick a place for lunch. I have been using Teams daily since last October. No issues. If it was consistently bad, it would have been replaced already. People I work with value their time. Also last week I was in a 2K+ people presentation with Q&A. I haven’t experienced most of the issues you mentioned, and don’t have the use case for some, like search or mobile. I use my email as my source of truth for communications, if it’s not in my inbox it didn’t happen. We are very diligent in keeping meeting minutes and transcripts which are shared my email at the end of the each call. | | |
| ▲ | dijit 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Your claim that "if it was consistently bad, it would have been replaced already" just... totally misunderstands how enterprise software decisions work, even in organisations where people value their time. Switching costs are enormous. Your organisation has Teams integrated with your Office 365 licensing, which means you're already paying for it. Replacing it with Slack means paying $8-12 per user per month on top of your existing Office costs, because you still need Outlook, Word, Excel, and SharePoint. For a 500-person company, that's an additional $48,000-72,000 annually for a tool that overlaps with something you've already paid for. Finance departments kill these proposals before they reach decision-makers, regardless of how much time is wasted on Teams' inefficiencies. The IT burden to move is quickly substantial. Migrating chat history, file repositories, and integrations takes months. You need to retrain users, update documentation, reconfigure SSO, and migrate bots and webhooks. Most IT departments are already understaffed. Unless Teams is completely non-functional, that project never gets prioritised over security updates, infrastructure maintenance, or business-critical requests. Organisations don't optimise for employee time the way you seem to think they do. The calculus isn't "is this tool good", it's "is this tool bad enough to justify the cost and disruption of replacing it". That threshold is extraordinarily high. People tolerate inefficient tools because the alternative is fighting procurement, convincing IT, and enduring months of migration pain. Lotus Notes persisted in enterprises for over a decade despite being universally despised because the switching cost was too high. SAP is notorious for terrible UX but remains entrenched because migration is a multi-year project costing millions. Your workflow actually proves the point. You use email as your source of truth because Teams' search and organisation aren't reliable enough. You manually distribute meeting minutes and transcripts because you don't trust Teams as a system of record. You've built workarounds to compensate for the tool's deficiencies and normalised them as standard practice. That's not Teams working well, that's your organisation adapting to work around its limitations. Let me address the specific issues you haven't encountered: - Teams' resource usage is measurable and documented. PC World's 2023 benchmarks showed Teams using 1.4GB RAM at idle compared to 500MB for Slack and 350MB for Discord. ExtremeTech's testing found Teams taking 22 seconds to cold start versus 4 seconds for Slack on identical hardware. r/sysadmin consistently reports Teams causing performance problems on machines with 8GB of RAM, forcing hardware upgrades. Microsoft implicitly acknowledged this by completely rebuilding Teams in 2023, promising 2x faster performance and 50% less memory. The fact that they had to rewrite the entire application is an admission that the performance problems were architectural. (it didn't help though) - Microsoft's own documentation acknowledges search limitations. The search index doesn't include all message content beyond a certain threshold. Results ranking is poor enough that Microsoft published a support article explaining how to use advanced search operators to find messages, which rather proves the basic search doesn't work. The r/MicrosoftTeams subreddit has over 3,000 posts about search not returning results that users know exist. IT administrators on Spiceworks report having to advise users to "use Ctrl+F in the browser if Teams search doesn't work", which is a workaround for a broken core feature. - Files uploaded in chat messages don't appear in the Files tab automatically. They're stored in a hidden SharePoint folder that most users don't know how to access. Microsoft's official guidance for this is to manually move files to the Files tab or use SharePoint directly. Is that an edge case? Is it FUCK, it's documented in Microsoft's own support articles as expected behaviour. If your organisation hasn't hit this, it's because you're not using Files tabs or you've trained people to work around it. - Microsoft's Tech Community forums have literally thousands of threads about notification badges showing unread messages that don't exist (5,000+ when I last checked), or notifications not appearing for actual messages. Microsoft's official response, posted repeatedly since 2020, is "we're aware of this issue and investigating". It's six years later now, it's still not fixed. The fact that you haven't noticed might mean your notification settings are configured differently, or you've unconsciously learned to ignore the notification count as unreliable. - Going back to r/MicrosoftTeams: the community continually documents persistent issues with the mobile app... notifications not syncing with desktop read state, automatic logouts requiring re-authentication, messages appearing in different orders on mobile versus desktop, and the app draining battery faster than comparable applications. GitHub's issue tracker for Teams mobile shows hundreds of unresolved bugs (then again, I suppose what popular app doesn't). You mentioned you don't use mobile, which explains why you haven't experienced this. - Regarding Chat versus channel architecture, Microsoft's own UX research lead, cited in a 2022 Verge interview, acknowledged that the distinction between chats and channels confuses users but can't be changed due to early architectural decisions. The duplicate groups issue I mentioned isn't a bug, it's a consequence of treating "Alice, Bob, Charlie" as a different entity from "Alice, Charlie, Bob". This is documented in Microsoft's developer documentation as intended behaviour. Your organisation either hasn't hit this scale yet or has developed unofficial naming conventions to work around it. You've been using Teams for four months. These issues emerge over time, at scale, or in specific usage patterns. When you're managing multiple projects with overlapping team members across different time zones and need to reference decisions made months ago, the organisational problems compound. When you're working on older hardware or need reliable mobile access, the performance issues become blocking. When you need to find a specific technical discussion from six months ago buried in one of 40 channels, the search deficiencies become critical. The question isn't whether Teams works for your specific, constrained use case after four months. The question is whether it's good software compared to alternatives, and whether the problems people report are valid. The evidence says yes, they are valid. The performance metrics are measurable. The bugs are documented in Microsoft's own forums. The UX problems are acknowledged by Microsoft's own researchers. The antitrust case is real. Your experience is one data point. It's not invalid, but it's also not representative. Saying "I haven't personally experienced these problems in my limited usage" doesn't refute the documented experiences of millions of users, the measured performance benchmarks, or the systematic issues that Microsoft itself acknowledges. It just means you haven't hit them yet, or your use case is simple enough that they don't matter, or you've normalised workarounds as standard practice. And, I haven't even started talking about what happens if you dare to work across multiple organisations. | | |
| ▲ | codethief 11 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Well said. > Replacing it with Slack means paying $8-12 per user per month on top of your existing Office costs, because you still need Outlook, Word, Excel, and SharePoint. For a 500-person company, that's an additional $48,000-72,000 annually for a tool that overlaps with something you've already paid for. If only in this calculation they'd factor in how much time each employee wastes because of Teams glitches… |
|
| |
| ▲ | 9dev 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Out of all the things you listed (and I'd have a couple more), copy-paste is really what drives me insane, because it's completely cursed! Sometimes, text copied from teams includes `[Sender Name, 2026-01-03, 21:51]` as a prefix—other times not. Sometimes you paste formatted text and it ends up pasted as formatted but inconsistent HTML, including (of course) text color of all things, rendering it black even with the dark theme, and thus unreadable. Other times you copy code, and there's two blank lines between each line when you paste elsewhere.
It makes you cry, really. | |
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Let's not forget how stupid the client on GNU/Linux was regarding audio devices. Every other app I had installed, that has anything to do with microphone (OBS, Audacity, Discord, Discord in Browser, Signal, ...) recognized my mic, which was connected via jack. Not MS Te-eams!!! Tada! Had to buy another headset with USB plug for Teams to get it. | | |
| ▲ | Wilder7977 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I get the same issue on Mac, if it's any comfort. I had to close and reopen the app 7-8 times to have my microphone recognized, despite it worked reliably on every single tool I ever used, both on Linux and later on Mac. Teams couldn't do that either with the native client or with the web client. |
| |
| ▲ | mrweasel 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Typing has input delay. Everything in Windows has input delay, ever since at Windows XP, it makes it infuriating to use. |
| |
| ▲ | Agingcoder 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It has a very large number of bugs. My favourite one ( still happens ) is having to mute then unmute at the beginning of the conversation otherwise nobody can hear me. It was so common, with people fiddling with their headset, calling again etc that I eventually asked everyone exhibiting audio issues to start with this Another interesting one is that if you’re not connected properly , you send messages , but never get notified that they never left, and are never notified that you’re not connected. It’s also a resource hog and will eat your machine for breakfast. The list goes on and on, it’s very surprising. | |
| ▲ | cmoski 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Notifying you about messages you've already seen. You have to change chats and to back for it to dismiss it. Kills me. Likes to open new windows if you click a notification. It is slow. The search is not good at showing multiple results from the one chat. Why does it search all the other chats anyway... Switching accounts constantly is a pain in the arse - I unfortunately have to use four accounts and one sub-account (member of some other org's team or something). | |
| ▲ | rootusrootus 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't love it, but I don't have many of the problems other people seem to have. And I've used everything from IRC in the 80s to Slack more recently. The only thing I can think of is that I don't run it on Windows, but rather a fairly new MacBook Pro M4. Maybe in this case it actually runs better on Mac, which is kind of ironic. | |
| ▲ | wolvoleo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's a resource hog, crashes, it's constantly littering files all over SharePoint which becomes even more than a garbage bin than it already is. And the UI is terrible, huge balloons around everything. I want density but even at the densest setting it sucks. Oh and it also fails to update online status. Often I click on a colleague who seems green and only then it updates and it turns out they've been away for 3 hours. Grrr | |
| ▲ | isk517 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Another one for the pile. You can choose to open office documents in Teams directly, the browser, or in the native desktop app, but you can only set it to open by default in either Teams or browser. Why? | |
| ▲ | perching_aix 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Wrote up a few of my gripes on here a few months ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45933952 | |
| ▲ | CamperBob2 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Teams feels as though it were vibe-coded, but dates back well before there was such a thing. It works, basically, but isn't something I'd feel good about shipping myself. |
|
|
| ▲ | TulliusCicero 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The risk is of course that the new thing might be worse than Teams somehow. |
| |
| ▲ | soperj 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The only possibility is if you get it from Oracle instead. | | | |
| ▲ | ziotom78 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It will surely be worse, at least at the beginning. But there is a significant chance that with time they will improve it, and one can hope that one year after the first release the product will actually be better than Teams, given that the developers will improve it based on their own experience. |
|
|
| ▲ | dgxyz 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They just shot Slack and moved to Teams only here. The company is falling apart so quickly they are going to have to pay up again before the end of the month. |
| |
| ▲ | andix 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Because slack startet to extort their customers. I guess many moved away, to be prepared if slack decides to push their prices even further. | | |
| ▲ | wrs 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Though, if your choice is between Salesforce licensing and Microsoft licensing, at least it’s possible to understand Salesforce licensing. | | |
| ▲ | andix 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | A lot of companies already have Teams included in their existing licenses. But yeah, Microsoft licensing is impossible to understand. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | andix 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don't have a lot of complaints with the current version of teams. Messaging and video calls work without major issues. It's bloated, and all those plugins are usually bad, but the basics work well for me. The new Outlook app is horrible though. |
|
| ▲ | Banditoz 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Every Teams team is backed by SharePoint, unfortunately. |
| |
| ▲ | jl6 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Teams, Sharepoint, Exchange, and OneDrive seem to be connected by a maze of dark twisty integration passages which no single human has mapped fully. | | |
| ▲ | procflora 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Somewhere, in the deepest bowels, Skype still lives. I'm sure of it. | | |
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It actually does or at least did, until at least a few years ago. When you opened the audio mixer (alsamixer or pulse audio control?) on XFCE, you could still see MS Teams labeled as Skype there. Not sure how it would be now, because I only ever use MS Teams isolated in a separate Ungoogled Chromium browser now, and have given up on the client for GNU/Linux. | |
| ▲ | marcosdumay 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Lync is still there, lurking. With Communicator blocking every contact with the outside world. But eventually some message will pass through! |
|
| |
| ▲ | muwtyhg 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And every private channel as well. And if you rename the Team, the SharePoint will become out-of-sync and all URLs will still use the old Team name. | | |
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Oh, this is useful info... Another tool in the box of making other people realize how much it sucks. |
| |
| ▲ | blitzar 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I knew I could smell a poo in the room, I didn't know what or who was responsible but it all makes sense now. |
|
|
| ▲ | elzbardico 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You kids have it easy. Once I worked in a company with two brands after a fusion, and all of us had to use both Exchange and Lotus Notes. And I was almost forgetting SharePoint. |
|
| ▲ | ergocoder 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > No more Teams? Sounds like a dream. No more Words? Introducing a worse software than Words... |
|
| ▲ | boringg 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I couldn't agree more with this. Teams somehow managed to supercede my other microphone preferences when I'm not even using teams (took me a while to figure out). It might be one of the apps I detest the most. There is very little satisfaction with it and much annoyance. |
| |
| ▲ | marcosdumay 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Somehow, Teams overrides the volume controls on my Android phone. It's physically user-hostile. | |
| ▲ | PeterStuer 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | By default, Teams never releases your audio input channel, even when you close it. | | |
| ▲ | boringg 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why would they do that? So annoying. | | |
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | 2 theories: (1) They couldn't imagine anyone ever closing their gloriously developed MS Teams. (2) Since everyone knows MS Teams and sitting in meetings all day is the one most important thing to get stuff done, they went ahead and made MS Teams a "priority". F using anything else! Maybe if it doesn't release the audio input, it will be 50ms faster next call! That ought to be enough for you! |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | zelphirkalt 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As bad and evil as MS Teams may be, I recently got invited to a Zoom meeting, and you simply can't use it in the browser! They just force you to download their shitty app to join. Naturally, I did not install crapware and closed the tab, as fortunately it was no mandatory event for me. At least in MS Teams I can isolate it into its separate ungoogled Chromium installation and treat that as a shitty app, without having to install crap onto my system. |
| |
| ▲ | distances an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Zoom calls work fine in the browser. They first make it look like you need the native client, but there's some dance you need to make to get the web link. Reload, wait, spin in your chair, something like that. Of course I would never choose Zoom or Teams if I had the power, but Chromium does work with both when those are the tools your client uses. | |
| ▲ | tlarkworthy an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | It makes you download it but then a button appears saying join in browser. I have tons of zoom binary copies |
|
|
| ▲ | macspoofing 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's not that bad. It's well integrated into Sharepoint, Exchange, and Office, and does the job. I've used both Slack and Teams and if you're using MS365, then Teams is absolutely the better option. |
| |
| ▲ | sigmoid10 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | As someone who has gone from 100% Slack in startups to all-in Teams in big corpo, I disagree. Teams won't even display all office file formats without you having to open the dedicated app. And if it does it's usually a half-baked browser mess. And don't even get me started on the UX or meeting options or mobile support or the complete lack of a dedicated Linux client. I don't need one app to do everything half-assed, I need one app that does exactly what it's meant for well. Preferably on every platform. | | |
| ▲ | thewebguyd 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > I don't need one app to do everything half-assed That's primarily why it sucks, and that seems to be Microsoft's standard operating procedure. Everything they put out is in the category of "does everything, but half-assed with a web of fragile "integrations" that break if you look at it funny." Worse, it's all SharePoint all the way down. Every team (and private channel!) is a SharePoint site, every user's OneDrive in the same tenant is a personal SharePoint Site. Every M365 Group gets its own SharePoint site (and mailbox). Creating a Team also creates an M365 group, but not vice versa. Heaven forbid you rename something in the stack or you are in for a world of pain. It's also by design that way. SharePoint storage is expensive, and boy what a disaster it is to ever try and get your data out of it. Yet, for some reason, companies keep buying it and keep using it, letting Microsoft suck them in and hold them there for eternity. If you're starting a new company, never, ever, buy anything Microsoft. Just don't go down that road. It's not worth it. | |
| ▲ | orochimaaru 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It’s not why your big corp chooses teams and the msft suite. From a corp perspective they don’t care about your edge case. There’s only - is it good for 90% of my use cases across the enterprise? And - do I get a bundle discount? Last but not the least - do I need to expend developer resources on it vs anything else? Yeah, there is half assed stuff. But it’s not what most of the big corp uses anyway. So your little dev specific use case isn’t going to get much traction. Teams does one thing well. It can do group chats and team calls. That’s most of what people use it for. And your corp gets a discount bundle. | | |
| ▲ | calgoo 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Our CEO Decided to use his own phone, use zoom instead of the corporate Teams, and uses ChatGPT where the rest of us are stuck with MS copilot test licenses. I guess its good to be at the top! | | |
| ▲ | joe_mamba 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Reminds me when at my previous company, management got themselves top macbooks for filing excel sheets and replying to emails, while rank and file engineers got the budget Lenovos with 8GB RAM | |
| ▲ | orochimaaru 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Depends on company size and how much influence legal, security and asset protection have. Usually at big corp I haven’t seen a ceo actually schedule their own calls or deal with day to day bullshit. They have a whole team of staff for that. |
|
| |
| ▲ | 0cf8612b2e1e 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you don’t want a half assed simulacra version, shouldn’t you prefer Teams open the native application? |
| |
| ▲ | clhodapp 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For many of us, you are describing a black hole of integrated nightmare software | |
| ▲ | cbolton 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sharepoint... the only webapp I have to use that feels worse than Teams. I swear when I open the intranet landing page, the loading, reloading, resizing, rereloading, re-whatever takes at least 10 seconds to settle. How can engineers build something be so inefficient? | |
| ▲ | boringg 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It is 100% that bad. | |
| ▲ | x0x0 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The children who write Teams cannot reliably deliver notifications on my mac without me restarting Teams every morning. I've spent a full day attempting to send a webhook in. Teams used to work like slack (a channel admin can create an endpoint; you post to it.) Microsoft deprecated that because it worked. It's now a maze of permissions and it silently fails with no error messages at all. Scrollback regularly fails and also requires app restart. I cannot insert images into a channel w/ a customer via drag and drop, but I can paste them by opening them in preview, copying the image, and cmd+v into the channel. I wasted 4 hours w/ support trying to figure out why I can't drag images into the shared channel before giving up. This is typical of the Teams experience. I could go on. Besides facebook's tools, it is the worst piece of software I've used and a demonstration of monopoly power to distribute total garbage. Slack has issues, but it does reliably do the core thing. | | |
| ▲ | creamyhorror 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I cannot insert images into a channel w/ a customer via drag and drop Yup, we struggle with this. Seems to have to do with needing to pay for seats in order to have file-sharing allowed (but you can still paste Sharepoint/Onedrive links). Can't share files if there's even a single external person in the chat/channel. Forced us to buy another seat subscription. It's great! | | |
| ▲ | x0x0 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | That kinda makes sense (and thank you!), but I think the comprehensive incompetence is thus: 1 - fails
2 - w/ no useful feedback to user;
3 - I couldn't get support to tell me why (fine, small account), but the customer with 900 licensed seats couldn't either Fortunately, said customer has come to the realization of how very bad it is and is hopefully migrating to Slack. |
|
| |
| ▲ | blitzar 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Sharepoint, Exchange, and Office A holy trinity if ever I have seen one. | |
| ▲ | Lio 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Teams not being able to do threaded conversations consistently or reliably is a massive pain for me. I hate it. Corporate IT is just hell for users. | |
| ▲ | soco 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Okay and what exactly does this integration bring? - opening Sharepoint pages in Teams' half-baked browser; - opening Word or Excel in Teams' own half-baked editor; - Exchange integration is the calendar, period. Nothing else. The only thing actually usable. Am I missing anything? |
|