| ▲ | Kimi K2.5 Technical Report [pdf](github.com) |
| 179 points by vinhnx 7 hours ago | 79 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | zeroxfe 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I've been using this model (as a coding agent) for the past few days, and it's the first time I've felt that an open source model really competes with the big labs. So far it's been able to handle most things I've thrown at it. I'm almost hesitant to say that this is as good as Opus. |
| |
| ▲ | armcat 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Out of curiosity, what kind of specs do you have (GPU / RAM)? I saw the requirements and it's a beyond my budget so I am "stuck" with smaller Qwen coders. | | |
| ▲ | observationist 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | API costs on these big models over private hosts tend to be a lot less than API calls to the big 4 American platforms. You definitely get more bang for your buck. | |
| ▲ | zeroxfe 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm not running it locally (it's gigantic!) I'm using the API at https://platform.moonshot.ai | | |
| ▲ | BeetleB 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Just curious - how does it compare to GLM 4.7? Ever since they gave the $28/year deal, I've been using it for personal projects and am very happy with it (via opencode). https://z.ai/subscribe | | |
| ▲ | InsideOutSanta 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There's no comparison. GLM 4.7 is fine and reasonably competent at writing code, but K2.5 is right up there with something like Sonnet 4.5. it's the first time I can use an open-source model and not immediately tell the difference between it and top-end models from Anthropic and OpenAI. | |
| ▲ | zeroxfe 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's waaay better than GLM 4.7 (which was the open model I was using earlier)! Kimi was able to quickly and smoothly finish some very complex tasks that GLM completely choked at. | |
| ▲ | segmondy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The old Kimi K2 is better than GLM4.7 | |
| ▲ | cmrdporcupine 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | From what people say, it's better than GLM 4.7 (and I guess DeepSeek 3.2) But it's also like... 10x the price per output token on any of the providers I've looked at. I don't feel it's 10x the value. It's still much cheaper than paying by the token for Sonnet or Opus, but if you have a subscribed plan from the Big 3 (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) it's much better value for $$. Comes down to ethical or openness reasons to use it I guess. | | |
| ▲ | esafak 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Exactly. For the price it has to beat Claude and GPT, unless you have budget for both. I just let GLM solve whatever it can and reserve my Claude budget for the rest. |
| |
| ▲ | akudha 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Is the Lite plan enough for your projects? | | |
| ▲ | BeetleB 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Very much so. I'm using it for small personal stuff on my home PC. Nothing grand. Not having to worry about token usage has been great (previously was paying per API use). I haven't stress tested it with anything large. Both at work and home, I don't give much free rein to the AI (e.g. I examine and approve all code changes). Lite plan doesn't have vision, so you cannot copy/paste an image there. But I can always switch models when I need to. |
|
| |
| ▲ | rc1 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | How long until this can be run on consumer grade hardware or a domestic electricity supply I wonder. Anyone have a projection? | | |
| ▲ | johndough 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You can run it on consumer grade hardware right now, but it will be rather slow. NVMe SSDs these days have a read speed of 7 GB/s (EDIT: or even faster than that! Thank you @hedgehog for the update), so it will give you one token roughly every three seconds while crunching through the 32 billion active parameters, which are natively quantized to 4 bit each. If you want to run it faster, you have to spend more money. Some people in the localllama subreddit have built systems which run large models at more decent speeds: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/ | | |
| ▲ | hedgehog 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | High end consumer SSDs can do closer to 15 GB/s, though only with PCI-e gen 5. On a motherboard with two m.2 slots that's potentially around 30GB/s from disk.
Edit: How fast everything is depends on how much data needs to get loaded from disk which is not always everything on MoE models. |
| |
| ▲ | segmondy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You can run it on a mac studio with 512gb ram, that's the easiest way. I run it at home on a multi rig GPU with partial offload to ram. | | |
| ▲ | johndough 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I was wondering whether multiple GPUs make it go appreciably faster when limited by VRAM. Do you have some tokens/sec numbers for text generation? |
| |
| ▲ | heliumtera 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You need 600gb of VRAM + MEMORY (+ DISK) to fit the model (full) or 240 for the 1b quantized model. Of course this will be slow. Through moonshot api it is pretty fast (much much much faster than Gemini 3 pro and Claude sonnet, probably faster than Gemini flash), though. To get similar experience they say at least 4xH200. If you don't mind running it super slow, you still need around 600gb of VRAM + fast RAM. It's already possible to run 4xH200 in a domestic environment (it would be instantaneous for most tasks, unbelievable speed). It's just very very expensive and probably challenging for most users, manageable/easy for the average hacker news crowd. Expensive AND hard to source high end GPUs, if you manage to source for the old prices around 200 thousand dollars to get maximum speed I guess, you could probably run decently on a bunch of high end machines, for let's say, 40k (slow). |
|
| |
| ▲ | Carrok 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not OP but OpenCode and DeepInfra seems like an easy way. | |
| ▲ | tgrowazay 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Just pick up any >240GB VRAM GPU off your local BestBuy to run a quantized version. > The full Kimi K2.5 model is 630GB and typically requires at least 4× H200 GPUs. | | |
| ▲ | CamperBob2 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | You could run the full, unquantized model at high speed with 8 RTX 6000 Blackwell boards. I don't see a way to put together a decent system of that scale for less than $100K, given RAM and SSD prices. A system with 4x H200s would cost more like $200K. |
|
| |
| ▲ | thesurlydev 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Can you share how you're running it? | | |
| ▲ | eknkc 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I've been using it with opencode. You can either use your kimi code subscription (flat fee), moonshot.ai api key (per token) or openrouter to access it. OpenCode works beautifully with the model. Edit: as a side note, I only installed opencode to try this model and I gotta say it is pretty good. Did not think it'd be as good as claude code but its just fine. Been using it with codex too. | | |
| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I tried to use opencode for kimi k2.5 too but recently they changed their pricing from 200 tool requests/5 hour to token based pricing. I can only speak from the tool request based but for some reason anecdotally opencode took like 10 requests in like 3-4 minutes where Kimi cli took 2-3 So I personally like/stick with the kimi cli for kimi coding. I haven't tested it out again with OpenAI with teh new token based pricing but I do think that opencode might add more token issue. Kimi Cli's pretty good too imo. You should check it out! https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-cli | | |
| ▲ | nl 35 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I like Kimi-cli but it does leak memory. I was using it for multi-hour tasks scripted via an self-written orchestrator on a small VM and ended up switching away from it because it would run slower and slower over time. |
|
| |
| ▲ | zeroxfe 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Running it via https://platform.moonshot.ai -- using OpenCode. They have super cheap monthly plans at kimi.com too, but I'm not using it because I already have codex and claude monthly plans. | | | |
| ▲ | explorigin 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/kimi-k2.5 Requirements are listed. | | |
| ▲ | KolmogorovComp 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | To save everyone a click > The 1.8-bit (UD-TQ1_0) quant will run on a single 24GB GPU if you offload all MoE layers to system RAM (or a fast SSD). With ~256GB RAM, expect ~10 tokens/s. The full Kimi K2.5 model is 630GB and typically requires at least 4× H200 GPUs.
If the model fits, you will get >40 tokens/s when using a B200.
To run the model in near full precision, you can use the 4-bit or 5-bit quants. You can use any higher just to be safe.
For strong performance, aim for >240GB of unified memory (or combined RAM+VRAM) to reach 10+ tokens/s. If you’re below that, it'll work but speed will drop (llama.cpp can still run via mmap/disk offload) and may fall from ~10 tokens/s to <2 token/s.
We recommend UD-Q2_K_XL (375GB) as a good size/quality balance. Best rule of thumb: RAM+VRAM ≈ the quant size; otherwise it’ll still work, just slower due to offloading. | | |
| ▲ | Gracana 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm running the Q4_K_M quant on a xeon with 7x A4000s and I'm getting about 8 tok/s with small context (16k). I need to do more tuning, I think I can get more out of it, but it's never gonna be fast on this suboptimal machine. | | |
| ▲ | segmondy 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | you can add 1 more GPU so you can take advantage of tensor parallel. I get the same speed with 5 3090's with most of the model on 2400mhz ddr4 ram, 8.5tk almost constant. I don't really do agents but chat, and it holds up to 64k. | | |
| ▲ | Gracana 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | That is a very good point and I would love to do it, but I built this machine in a desktop case and the motherboard has seven slots. I did a custom water cooling manifold just to make it work with all the cards. I'm trying to figure out how to add another card on a riser hanging off a slimsas port, or maybe I could turn the bottom slot into two vertical slots.. the case (fractal meshify 2 xl) has room for a vertical mounted card that wouldn't interfere with the others, but I'd need to make a custom riser with two slots on it to make it work. I dunno, it's possible! I also have an RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell and an RTX 5000 Ada.. I'd be better off pulling all the A7000s and throwing both of those cards in this machine, but then I wouldn't have anything for my desktop. Decisions, decisions! |
| |
| ▲ | esafak 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The pitiful state of GPUs. $10K for a sloth with no memory. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | gigatexal 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah I too am curious. Because Claude code is so good and the ecosystem so just it works that I’m
Willing to pay them. | | |
| ▲ | epolanski 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You can plug another model in place of Anthropic ones in Claude Code. | | |
| ▲ | miroljub 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | If you don't use Antrophic models there's no reason to use Claude Code at all. Opencode gives so much more choice. | |
| ▲ | zeroxfe 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That tends to work quite poorly because Claude Code does not use standard completions APIs. I tried it with Kimi, using litellm[proxy], and it failed in too many places. | | |
| ▲ | AnonymousPlanet 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It worked very well for me using qwen3 coder behind a litellm. Most other models just fail in weird ways though. | |
| ▲ | samtheprogram 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | opencode is a good alternative that doesnt flake out in this way. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I tried kimi k2.5 and first I didn't really like it. I was critical of it but then I started liking it. Also, the model has kind of replaced how I use chatgpt too & I really love kimi 2.5 the most right now (although gemini models come close too) To be honest, I do feel like kimi k2.5 is the best open source model. It's not the best model itself right now tho but its really price performant and for many use cases might be nice depending on it. It might not be the completely SOTA that people say but it comes pretty close and its open source and I trust the open source part because I feel like other providers can also run it and just about a lot of other things too (also considering that iirc chatgpt recently slashed some old models) I really appreciate kimi for still open sourcing their complete SOTA and then releasing some research papers on top of them unlike Qwen which has closed source its complete SOTA. Thank you Kimi! |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | Imanari 26 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I have been very impressed with this model and also with the Kimi CLI. I have been using it with the 'Moderato' plan (7 days free, then 19$). A true competitor to Claude Code with Opus. |
|
| ▲ | zzleeper an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Do any of these models do well with information retrieval and reasoning from text? I'm reading newspaper articles through a MoE of gemini3flash and gpt5mini, and what made it hard to use open models (at the time) was a lack of support for pydantic. |
| |
| ▲ | jychang an hour ago | parent [-] | | That roughly correlates with tool calling capabilities. Kimi K2.5 is a lot better than previous open source models in that regard. You should try out K2.5 for your use case, it might actually succeed where previous generation open source models failed. |
|
|
| ▲ | storus 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Do I need to have two M3U 512GB MacStudios to run this? |
|
| ▲ | derac 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I really like the agent swarm thing, is it possible to use that functionality with OpenCode or is that a Kimi CLI specific thing? Does the agent need to be aware of the capability? |
| |
| ▲ | zeroxfe 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It seems to work with OpenCode, but I can't tell exactly what's going on -- I was super impressed when OpenCode presented me with a UI to switch the view between different sub-agents. I don't know if OpenCode is aware of the capability, or the model is really good at telling the harness how to spawn sub-agents or execute parallel tool calls. | |
| ▲ | esafak 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Has anyone tried it and decided it's worth the cost; I've heard it's even more profligate with tokens? |
|
|
| ▲ | miroljub 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've been quite satisfied lately with MiniMax M-2.1 in opencode. How does Kimi 2.5 compare to it in real world scenarios? |
| |
| ▲ | viraptor 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | A lot better in my experience. M2.1 to me feels between haiku and sonnet. K2.5 feels close to opus. That's based on my testing of removing some code and getting it to reimplement based on tests. Also the design/spec writing feels great. You can still test k2.5 for free in OpenCode today. | | |
| ▲ | miroljub 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well, Minimax was the equivalent of Sonnet in my testing. If Kimi approach Opus, that would be great. | | |
| ▲ | samtheprogram 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Kimi K2.5 approaches Sonnet as well from what I can tell, it's just slower to get to the result. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | syndacks 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How do people evaluate creative writing and emotional intelligence in LLMs? Most benchmarks seem to focus on reasoning or correctness, which feels orthogonal. I’ve been playing with Kimmy K 2.5 and it feels much stronger on voice and emotional grounding, but I don’t know how to measure that beyond human judgment. |
|
| ▲ | epolanski 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's interesting to note that a model that can OpenAI is valued almost 400 times more than moonshotai, despite their models being surprisingly close. |
| |
| ▲ | famouswaffles 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | OpenAI is a household name with nearly a billion weekly active users. Not sure there's any reality where they wouldn't be valued much more than Kimi regardless of how close the models may be. | |
| ▲ | m3kw9 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Unless they can beat their capabilities by a clear magical step up and has infrastructure to capture the users | |
| ▲ | moffkalast 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well to be the devil's advocate: One is a household name that holds most of the world's silicon wafers for ransom, and the other sounds like a crypto scam. Also estimating valuation of Chinese companies is sort of nonsense when they're all effectively state owned. | | |
| ▲ | epolanski 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | There isn't a single % that is state owned in Moonshot AI. And don't start me with the "yeah but if the PRC" because it's gross when US can de facto ban and impose conditions even on European companies, let alone the control it has on US ones. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | firasd 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm not very familiar with this model series but tried it when prototyping a potential 'Vibesbench' (my eval) conversation I tried it. Here's Kimi on a Robocop scene kimi k2 thinking turbo "He’s not being poetic; he’s weaponizing nostalgia. Quoting Casablanca—the ultimate “beautiful sacrifice” romance—to taunt Morton about corporate backstabbing is pure executive sleaze. It’s the same move as his mahogany desk and flag pin: draping sentimental Americana over naked power. He’s essentially saying, “Isn’t it romantic, Bob? You fought the good fight, now you die.” " grok 4.1 "So when Dick Jones smirks and says, “Time goes by, it’s the same old story… the fight for love and glory, huh, Bob?” that’s pure Ed Neumeier flexing his love of old Hollywood while simultaneously mocking how these psychopathic ’80s execs think they’re in some grand cinematic drama instead of just murdering a guy for market share." chatgpt-4o "The reason the Casablanca reference matters is RoboCop itself is partially a noir—and also a tragedy built inside a genre engine. [… ] So yeah, calling back to Casablanca is not just some meta-joke—it’s a knowing wink that RoboCop is a noir trapped in cybernetic skin. // Even Clarence Boddicker, for all his cartoonish sadism, plays like a twisted stand-in for a noir heavy—talking smooth, dropping nicknames, throwing out casual violence like it’s a punchline." opus 4.5 "Jones is performing avuncular menace. He's the kind of executive who'd quote old movies while having you murdered, because it's all performance to him, all style. The substance is just power." |
|
| ▲ | margorczynski 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I wonder how K2.5 + OpenCode compares to Opus with CC. If it is close I would let go of my subscription, as probably a lot of people. |
| |
| ▲ | eknkc 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It is not opus. It is good, works really fast and suprisingly through about its decisions. However I've seen it hallucinate things. Just today I asked for a code review and it flagged a method that can be `static`. The problem is it was already static. That kind of stuff never happens with Opus 4.5 as far as I can tell. Also, in an opencode Plan mode (read only). It generated a plan and instead of presenting it and stopping, decided to implement it. Could not use the edit and write tools because the harness was in read only mode. But it had bash and started using bash to edit stuff. Wouldn't just fucking stop even though the error messages it received from opencode stated why. Its plan and the resulting code was ok so I let it go crazy though... | | |
| ▲ | esafak 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Some models have a mind of their own. I keep them on a leash with `permission` blocks in OC -- especially for rm/mv/git. |
| |
| ▲ | naragon 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I've been using K2.5 with OpenCode to do code assessments/fixes and Opus 4.5 with CC to check the work, and so far so good. Very impressed with it so far, but I don't feel comfortable canceling my Claude subscription just yet. Haven't tried it on large feature implementations. | |
| ▲ | ithkuil 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I also wonder if CC can be used with k2.5 with the appropriate API adapter | | |
|
|
| ▲ | cmrdporcupine an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| DeepSeek is likely to release a new model soon, and judging from the past it's likely to be more cost effective and just as or more powerful than Kimi 2.5. DeepSeek 3.2 was already quite compelling. I expect its successor will be competitive. |
|
| ▲ | llmslave 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The benchmarks on all these models are meaningless |
| |
| ▲ | alchemist1e9 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why and what would a good benchmark look like? | | |
| ▲ | moffkalast 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | 30 people trying out all models on the list for their use case for a week and then checking what they're still using a month after. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | gedy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Sorry if this is an easy-answerable question - but by open we can download this and use totally offline if now or in the future if we have hardware capable? Seems like a great thing to archive if the world falls apart (said half-jokingly) |
| |
| ▲ | Tepix 36 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | You could buy five Strix Halo systems at $2000 each, network them and run it. Rough estimage: 12.5:2.2 so
you should get around 5.5 tokens/s. | | |
| ▲ | j-bos 28 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Is the software/drivers for networking LLMs on Strix Halo there yet? I was under the impression a few weeks ago that it's veeeery early stages and terribly slow. |
| |
| ▲ | fragmede 23 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes but the hardware to run it decently gonna cost you north of $100k, so hopefully you and your bunkermates allocated the right amount to this instead of guns or ammo. | |
| ▲ | Carrok 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes. | |
| ▲ | cmrdporcupine an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes, but you'll need some pretty massive hardware. |
|
|
| ▲ | behnamoh 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's a decent model but works best with kimi CLI, not CC or others. |
| |