| ▲ | BeetleB 10 hours ago | |||||||
Just curious - how does it compare to GLM 4.7? Ever since they gave the $28/year deal, I've been using it for personal projects and am very happy with it (via opencode). | ||||||||
| ▲ | InsideOutSanta 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
There's no comparison. GLM 4.7 is fine and reasonably competent at writing code, but K2.5 is right up there with something like Sonnet 4.5. it's the first time I can use an open-source model and not immediately tell the difference between it and top-end models from Anthropic and OpenAI. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | zeroxfe 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It's waaay better than GLM 4.7 (which was the open model I was using earlier)! Kimi was able to quickly and smoothly finish some very complex tasks that GLM completely choked at. | ||||||||
| ▲ | segmondy 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
The old Kimi K2 is better than GLM4.7 | ||||||||
| ▲ | cmrdporcupine 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
From what people say, it's better than GLM 4.7 (and I guess DeepSeek 3.2) But it's also like... 10x the price per output token on any of the providers I've looked at. I don't feel it's 10x the value. It's still much cheaper than paying by the token for Sonnet or Opus, but if you have a subscribed plan from the Big 3 (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) it's much better value for $$. Comes down to ethical or openness reasons to use it I guess. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | akudha 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Is the Lite plan enough for your projects? | ||||||||
| ||||||||