I'm not running it locally (it's gigantic!) I'm using the API at https://platform.moonshot.ai

BeetleB 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Just curious - how does it compare to GLM 4.7? Ever since they gave the $28/year deal, I've been using it for personal projects and am very happy with it (via opencode).

https://z.ai/subscribe

▲

InsideOutSanta 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

There's no comparison. GLM 4.7 is fine and reasonably competent at writing code, but K2.5 is right up there with something like Sonnet 4.5. it's the first time I can use an open-source model and not immediately tell the difference between it and top-end models from Anthropic and OpenAI.

	▲	5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

zeroxfe 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's waaay better than GLM 4.7 (which was the open model I was using earlier)! Kimi was able to quickly and smoothly finish some very complex tasks that GLM completely choked at.

▲

segmondy 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The old Kimi K2 is better than GLM4.7

▲

cmrdporcupine 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

From what people say, it's better than GLM 4.7 (and I guess DeepSeek 3.2)

But it's also like... 10x the price per output token on any of the providers I've looked at.

I don't feel it's 10x the value. It's still much cheaper than paying by the token for Sonnet or Opus, but if you have a subscribed plan from the Big 3 (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) it's much better value for $$.

Comes down to ethical or openness reasons to use it I guess.

	▲	esafak 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Exactly. For the price it has to beat Claude and GPT, unless you have budget for both. I just let GLM solve whatever it can and reserve my Claude budget for the rest.

▲

akudha 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is the Lite plan enough for your projects?

	▲	BeetleB 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Very much so. I'm using it for small personal stuff on my home PC. Nothing grand. Not having to worry about token usage has been great (previously was paying per API use). I haven't stress tested it with anything large. Both at work and home, I don't give much free rein to the AI (e.g. I examine and approve all code changes). Lite plan doesn't have vision, so you cannot copy/paste an image there. But I can always switch models when I need to.

▲

rc1 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

How long until this can be run on consumer grade hardware or a domestic electricity supply I wonder.

Anyone have a projection?

▲

johndough 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can run it on consumer grade hardware right now, but it will be rather slow. NVMe SSDs these days have a read speed of 7 GB/s (EDIT: or even faster than that! Thank you @hedgehog for the update), so it will give you one token roughly every three seconds while crunching through the 32 billion active parameters, which are natively quantized to 4 bit each. If you want to run it faster, you have to spend more money.

Some people in the localllama subreddit have built systems which run large models at more decent speeds: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/

▲

hedgehog 8 hours ago | parent [-]

High end consumer SSDs can do closer to 15 GB/s, though only with PCI-e gen 5. On a motherboard with two m.2 slots that's potentially around 30GB/s from disk. Edit: How fast everything is depends on how much data needs to get loaded from disk which is not always everything on MoE models.

▲

greenavocado 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Would RAID zero help here?

	▲	hedgehog 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, RAID 0 or 1 could both work in this case to combine the disks. You would want to check the bus topology for the specific motherboard to make sure the slots aren't on the other side of a hub or something like that.

▲

segmondy 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can run it on a mac studio with 512gb ram, that's the easiest way. I run it at home on a multi rig GPU with partial offload to ram.

	▲	johndough 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I was wondering whether multiple GPUs make it go appreciably faster when limited by VRAM. Do you have some tokens/sec numbers for text generation?

▲

heliumtera 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You need 600gb of VRAM + MEMORY (+ DISK) to fit the model (full) or 240 for the 1b quantized model. Of course this will be slow.

Through moonshot api it is pretty fast (much much much faster than Gemini 3 pro and Claude sonnet, probably faster than Gemini flash), though. To get similar experience they say at least 4xH200.

If you don't mind running it super slow, you still need around 600gb of VRAM + fast RAM.

It's already possible to run 4xH200 in a domestic environment (it would be instantaneous for most tasks, unbelievable speed). It's just very very expensive and probably challenging for most users, manageable/easy for the average hacker news crowd.

Expensive AND hard to source high end GPUs, if you manage to source for the old prices around 200 thousand dollars to get maximum speed I guess, you could probably run decently on a bunch of high end machines, for let's say, 40k (slow).