| ▲ | hiprob 19 hours ago |
| What are you going to do about it? Use Android? |
|
| ▲ | shimman 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Me? I'm working to help people get elected to Congress to help regulate this mess. |
| |
| ▲ | pixl97 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | At the end of the day Apple is doing their damnedest to force the requirement to support other app stores. They want their cake, and they want to eat it too. Unfortunately they are going to make an epic fuckton of money before they get told to stop. | |
| ▲ | dyauspitr 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There is so much stuff that needs to get fixed in congress over this issue is even a blip on the radar. | |
| ▲ | chuneezy 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Bravo! | |
| ▲ | nout 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Why would you want to give the government such power? That always amazes me... when there is an issue, people jump on "let's vote for government to regulate this", but then they are surprised when a new government gets to power and uses this new regulation/capability against you. | | |
| ▲ | cephi 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I may regret asking but what is your solution, then? | | |
| ▲ | nout 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My (user) solution would be to use Patreon on the web, or on Android. No one is forcing you to use specifically the native Apple app. On top of that Patreon is a closed centralized platform that's bound to have issues like this and that's where I very much prefer using protocols (vs platforms) that enable the same. There are very similar solutions to Patreon, but based on nostr and related protocols. What is your solution to the government that you may not like using previously established "regulations" against people? My point is that you ask for regulation hoping that it will prevent this type of issue, but the regulation that you actually get will be barely having any effect and it will enforce ID + picture verification, it will enforce downloading specific government sanctioned keylogger app, it will enforce specific US state association, etc. New systems, new complexity, harder for newcomers to start business... Things like this are always added in the fine print. It will just lead to excluding so many people from using the service and making the overall space so much worse. That's why I'm encouraging people to think twice before immediately asking the government to expand its overreach via new regulations. | | |
| ▲ | pipo234 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > On top of that Patreon is a closed centralized platform that's bound to have issues like this and that's where I very much prefer using protocols (vs platforms) that enable the same. There are very similar solutions to Patreon, but based on nostr and related protocols. The problem here isn't that Patreon is centralized, but that the app store is. Apple could easily require a cut from any app using nostr and related protocols. Or simply ban them altogether. Not saying government mandates are ideal, but I don't see any other way to force some sense into Apple (or Google). App stores should be some sort of independent institutions (non-profits) but companies have no incentive to cede that revenue. Until that happens, best not download from app stores unless absolutely necessary. | |
| ▲ | dns_snek 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > My point is that you ask for regulation hoping that it will prevent this type of issue, but the regulation that you actually get will be barely having any effect and it will enforce ID + picture verification, it will enforce downloading specific government sanctioned keylogger app, This is nonsense. Yes bad regulation is bad regulation, that's not an argument against regulation but an argument against bad regulation. Not all regulation is bad regulation - in fact most of it is good regulation. I enjoy not drinking feces for example but I'd love to hear your thoughts on how regulation against poopy drinking water is going to be turned against me. > New systems, new complexity, harder for newcomers to start business... Things like this are always added in the fine print. Good regulation recognizes that small businesses don't have the same ability to comply with complex requirements, so it creates exceptions for small business or relaxes requirements. By all means, please advocate for good regulation and call out bad regulation, but pretending that regulation is unnecessary or inherently harmful only serves the interest of capital at everyone else's expense. | | |
| ▲ | luqtas 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I enjoy not drinking feces for example but I'd love to hear your thoughts on how regulation against poopy drinking water is going to be turned against me. you can't interfere or comment effectively on the policies or processes of your water treatment plant. on the Patreon case the user can simply stop using Apple hardware or move to the web throwing every problem down to the goverment feels like: i believe in animal rights so instead of going vegan i'll protest to the goverment make it illegal to kill sentient animals for products. i know we can do both but OP's anarchy solutions feels much more reasonable than expecting the goverment solve stuff. creating a culture that uses de-centralized approaches is times better than sticking to a centralized platform, regulated or not | | |
| ▲ | dns_snek 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > you can't interfere or comment effectively on the policies or processes of your water treatment plant Of course you can! You can simply install a well, a water filtration/RO system to make poopy water drinkable, or move to a different town that better suits your water quality needs. You always have the option of taking matters into your own hands and the point of having a government is so that you don't have to, in the interest of boosting quality of life and productivity. > throwing every problem down to the goverment feels like: i believe in animal rights so instead of going vegan i'll protest to the goverment make it illegal to kill sentient animals for products. Yes - obviously? That's how "rights" work, what separates them from "personal beliefs" is existence of a law that prohibits (or stipulates) certain actions from other people. If I say that murder is cruel and harmful to other people, is your suggestion that I simply abstain from murder instead of demanding legislation that prohibits it? |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | weberer 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Use Android | | |
| ▲ | socalgal2 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That is the user's solution. Patreon (the company having trouble with Apple) is not in the position to get ~50% of it's users to use a different phone. Apple should not be allowed to be in the middle of business and half the users of the world. And yes, that is very much something that governments have regulated for decades. In fact it's basically why anti-trust was invented. Train companies and deals with Standard Oil meant together they controlled the market since if you didn't go through them you couldn't ship your product. | |
| ▲ | anonymous908213 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Android is actively in the process of trying to kill off the ability to install your own software that is not Google-approved, so this is temporary solution at best. | | |
| ▲ | johnisgood 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well, since everything seems to be getting worse, lots of good stuff are a temporary solution. Kinda sucks. |
| |
| ▲ | johnnyanmac 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That's only a solution until Google does the same. And then we're stuck. What do we do when the two largest phone platforms perform this stuff? Go off the grid instead of talking to our representatives? | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | mattnewton 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | there is little other remedy to monopoly power? | |
| ▲ | johnnyanmac 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >Why would you want to give the government such power? Because the government is the only body equipped to create and enforce consumer rights laws. Do you think we'd have refund policies if the government didn't regulate them? >then they are surprised when a new government gets to power and uses this new regulation/capability against you. Okay. How is the act of forbidding platforms from banning alternative payment processors going to backfire? | |
| ▲ | pessimizer 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I want them to use antitrust regulation against everyone, including me. That's what having values is like. Markets without competition degenerate. Markets are also artificial and always rely on government enforcement to exist - Apple sues people who try to get around its market manipulation. You just prefer that governments help enforce trusts and destroy competition that those trusts denote as unfair. | | |
| ▲ | bigstrat2003 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Markets are also artificial and always rely on government enforcement to exist - Apple sues people who try to get around its market manipulation. Historically, markets are destroyed by government interference, not propped up by it. Your own example is a case in point: were it not for the government making laws in favor of entrenched companies, Apple couldn't sue the people trying to get around its market manipulation. > You just prefer that governments help enforce trusts and destroy competition that those trusts denote as unfair. This is a grossly unfair mischaracterization of the post you are replying to. Bad show, old chap. | | |
| ▲ | cyberax 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Apple doesn't _need_ to sue people. They can just stop distributing their apps. That's it. No "government monopoly" or anything, just regular commercial monopolism. |
|
| |
| ▲ | leptons 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/media/1344546/dl?inline Apple is already getting sued by the DOJ for their abusive business practices. They should be regulated. | |
| ▲ | shimman 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | hermanzegerman 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Google is also making Sideloading harder "to protect users" |
|
| ▲ | teejmya 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah, lol. Was all Apple since the iBook G4. Bought a Pixel last week. It's nice. |
|
| ▲ | fblp 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is also a political issue. The administration could have ftc investigate this under anti-trust, and the government could also pass tighter laws preventing this. But this current administration is likely too friendly to big corporate interests. |
|
| ▲ | pjerem 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Well. I own an iPhone, a Macbook, Airpods, Apple Watch. I'm in the Apple ecosystem since the last 16 years. Unfortunately, due to their behavior in the latest years, I'm not going to buy anything Apple anymore. Fortunately for me, I prefer Linux to MacOS so I never have been totally tied in the Apple ecosystem and I know how to leave the boat without a lot of hassle. I'm really saddened because they know how to make great products when they want to. It's just infuriating that everything that is shitty in their products is never due to randomness or bugs or whatever, but ALWAYS because they decided to fuck you. |
|
| ▲ | tcoff91 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| launch an in-app browser and don't use apple as the payment processor. The Epic v Apple lawsuit verdict makes this allowed now. |
| |
| ▲ | 1v1id 18 hours ago | parent [-] | | My understanding was that you could have a button that could take the user outside of the app to pay (i.e. your website). So progress, but not this level of freedom yet. |
|
|
| ▲ | hilti 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Half of the apps on the app store can easily be replaced by a PWA that works on iOS and Android. |
|
| ▲ | esseph 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| GrapheneOS |
|
| ▲ | tootie 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Use Android or use websites instead of apps. Apple pushes their app ecosystem so hard because it's their walled garden. If you want to support a creator, go their website and click whatever they offer. |
| |
|
| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Can we please just have cheap/affordable linux phones at this point. I am so close to having raspberry pi phones but even rasp pi 's are getting expensive because of AI dammit |
| |
| ▲ | johnnyanmac 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | What's the big barrier stopping Linux from becoming a viable mobile OS? Or at least some completely de-googlefied AOSP? | | |
| ▲ | handedness 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | GrapheneOS is already a viable de-Googled and significantly hardened and improved fork of AOSP. It runs on Google Pixels at present, with an OEM device planned for release in 2027. | | |
| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | I guess yeah, Most of my concerns were with Privacy but yea looks like grapheneos is a tradeoff I might have to make some day but honestly its also the fact that I love cli tools and yea I can and I have used termux in the past but I really wish for a more first class for cli tools as well and I don't know but I just really wish to support linux tools. Like I am just not satisfied with the current options we have right now and you can look at fragmede's comment as to why I mean that. I mean I just want a cheap affordable linux phone with just decent specs nothing too fancy. By decent I mean that I used to be on a dumb phone for a year with 32 mb ram iirc so perhaps my specs can be considered to be minimal but I feel like 2-4GB ram might be a good start. (prefer the 4gb option as to favour both me anad the masses) Can framework or some other company go ahead and create a linux phone too please? |
| |
| ▲ | fragmede 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Hardware. Mass manufacturing, plus the deep pockets of a corporation, mean that we've come to expect cheap prices for inanely powerful hardware. Yes I'm calling an $1,800 iphone cheap for what you get. That's cheap for what you get because if you're a tiny company, you can't get a phone of that level manufactured that you can still for anywhere near that price, and that's a super high end model. How many people are going to shell out $1,000 for a model with the specs of a $500 model just because it runs Linux? And that's before you even actually deal with the software. Specifically, driver support, battery life, and app support are the three big show stoppers there. The best option this second is a Pixel running GrapheneOS, and that's based on Android on Goolge hardware. (They did just announce getting off Pixels tho.) A Linux smartphone has been tried before. That's not too say someone shouldn't try again, but just to say there are lessons to be learned from those attempts. | | |
| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > How many people are going to shell out $1,000 for a model with the specs of a $500 model just because it runs Linux? And that's before you even actually deal with the software Thanks for writing this comment because that's exactly something which I wanted to convey with my original comment too | |
| ▲ | johnnyanmac 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, that makes sense on the hardware end. It's really hard to compete and even some large players like LG ultimately fell out because of that. But I was more speaking on the software end. You can certainly piss off Google if enough people decided to buy an android phone but have it boot up Linux instead. Might even piss off Samsung, so that's a plus. I assume the infrastructure to get APK support on Linux is a herculean task, though (that's the only way I see as a middleground until native linux apps work on mobile). | | |
| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | There is a way to run waydroid/android applications in Linux. I have personally tried it and honestly it does work great for the most part. |
|
|
|
|