| ▲ | nout 18 hours ago |
| Why would you want to give the government such power? That always amazes me... when there is an issue, people jump on "let's vote for government to regulate this", but then they are surprised when a new government gets to power and uses this new regulation/capability against you. |
|
| ▲ | cephi 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I may regret asking but what is your solution, then? |
| |
| ▲ | nout 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My (user) solution would be to use Patreon on the web, or on Android. No one is forcing you to use specifically the native Apple app. On top of that Patreon is a closed centralized platform that's bound to have issues like this and that's where I very much prefer using protocols (vs platforms) that enable the same. There are very similar solutions to Patreon, but based on nostr and related protocols. What is your solution to the government that you may not like using previously established "regulations" against people? My point is that you ask for regulation hoping that it will prevent this type of issue, but the regulation that you actually get will be barely having any effect and it will enforce ID + picture verification, it will enforce downloading specific government sanctioned keylogger app, it will enforce specific US state association, etc. New systems, new complexity, harder for newcomers to start business... Things like this are always added in the fine print. It will just lead to excluding so many people from using the service and making the overall space so much worse. That's why I'm encouraging people to think twice before immediately asking the government to expand its overreach via new regulations. | | |
| ▲ | pipo234 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > On top of that Patreon is a closed centralized platform that's bound to have issues like this and that's where I very much prefer using protocols (vs platforms) that enable the same. There are very similar solutions to Patreon, but based on nostr and related protocols. The problem here isn't that Patreon is centralized, but that the app store is. Apple could easily require a cut from any app using nostr and related protocols. Or simply ban them altogether. Not saying government mandates are ideal, but I don't see any other way to force some sense into Apple (or Google). App stores should be some sort of independent institutions (non-profits) but companies have no incentive to cede that revenue. Until that happens, best not download from app stores unless absolutely necessary. | |
| ▲ | dns_snek 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > My point is that you ask for regulation hoping that it will prevent this type of issue, but the regulation that you actually get will be barely having any effect and it will enforce ID + picture verification, it will enforce downloading specific government sanctioned keylogger app, This is nonsense. Yes bad regulation is bad regulation, that's not an argument against regulation but an argument against bad regulation. Not all regulation is bad regulation - in fact most of it is good regulation. I enjoy not drinking feces for example but I'd love to hear your thoughts on how regulation against poopy drinking water is going to be turned against me. > New systems, new complexity, harder for newcomers to start business... Things like this are always added in the fine print. Good regulation recognizes that small businesses don't have the same ability to comply with complex requirements, so it creates exceptions for small business or relaxes requirements. By all means, please advocate for good regulation and call out bad regulation, but pretending that regulation is unnecessary or inherently harmful only serves the interest of capital at everyone else's expense. | | |
| ▲ | luqtas 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I enjoy not drinking feces for example but I'd love to hear your thoughts on how regulation against poopy drinking water is going to be turned against me. you can't interfere or comment effectively on the policies or processes of your water treatment plant. on the Patreon case the user can simply stop using Apple hardware or move to the web throwing every problem down to the goverment feels like: i believe in animal rights so instead of going vegan i'll protest to the goverment make it illegal to kill sentient animals for products. i know we can do both but OP's anarchy solutions feels much more reasonable than expecting the goverment solve stuff. creating a culture that uses de-centralized approaches is times better than sticking to a centralized platform, regulated or not | | |
| ▲ | dns_snek 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > you can't interfere or comment effectively on the policies or processes of your water treatment plant Of course you can! You can simply install a well, a water filtration/RO system to make poopy water drinkable, or move to a different town that better suits your water quality needs. You always have the option of taking matters into your own hands and the point of having a government is so that you don't have to, in the interest of boosting quality of life and productivity. > throwing every problem down to the goverment feels like: i believe in animal rights so instead of going vegan i'll protest to the goverment make it illegal to kill sentient animals for products. Yes - obviously? That's how "rights" work, what separates them from "personal beliefs" is existence of a law that prohibits (or stipulates) certain actions from other people. If I say that murder is cruel and harmful to other people, is your suggestion that I simply abstain from murder instead of demanding legislation that prohibits it? |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | weberer 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Use Android | | |
| ▲ | socalgal2 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That is the user's solution. Patreon (the company having trouble with Apple) is not in the position to get ~50% of it's users to use a different phone. Apple should not be allowed to be in the middle of business and half the users of the world. And yes, that is very much something that governments have regulated for decades. In fact it's basically why anti-trust was invented. Train companies and deals with Standard Oil meant together they controlled the market since if you didn't go through them you couldn't ship your product. | |
| ▲ | anonymous908213 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Android is actively in the process of trying to kill off the ability to install your own software that is not Google-approved, so this is temporary solution at best. | | |
| ▲ | johnisgood 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well, since everything seems to be getting worse, lots of good stuff are a temporary solution. Kinda sucks. |
| |
| ▲ | johnnyanmac 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That's only a solution until Google does the same. And then we're stuck. What do we do when the two largest phone platforms perform this stuff? Go off the grid instead of talking to our representatives? | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | mattnewton 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| there is little other remedy to monopoly power? |
|
| ▲ | johnnyanmac 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >Why would you want to give the government such power? Because the government is the only body equipped to create and enforce consumer rights laws. Do you think we'd have refund policies if the government didn't regulate them? >then they are surprised when a new government gets to power and uses this new regulation/capability against you. Okay. How is the act of forbidding platforms from banning alternative payment processors going to backfire? |
|
| ▲ | pessimizer 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I want them to use antitrust regulation against everyone, including me. That's what having values is like. Markets without competition degenerate. Markets are also artificial and always rely on government enforcement to exist - Apple sues people who try to get around its market manipulation. You just prefer that governments help enforce trusts and destroy competition that those trusts denote as unfair. |
| |
| ▲ | bigstrat2003 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Markets are also artificial and always rely on government enforcement to exist - Apple sues people who try to get around its market manipulation. Historically, markets are destroyed by government interference, not propped up by it. Your own example is a case in point: were it not for the government making laws in favor of entrenched companies, Apple couldn't sue the people trying to get around its market manipulation. > You just prefer that governments help enforce trusts and destroy competition that those trusts denote as unfair. This is a grossly unfair mischaracterization of the post you are replying to. Bad show, old chap. | | |
| ▲ | cyberax 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Apple doesn't _need_ to sue people. They can just stop distributing their apps. That's it. No "government monopoly" or anything, just regular commercial monopolism. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | leptons 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/media/1344546/dl?inline Apple is already getting sued by the DOJ for their abusive business practices. They should be regulated. |
|
| ▲ | shimman 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [flagged] |
