> Markets are also artificial and always rely on government enforcement to exist - Apple sues people who try to get around its market manipulation.

Historically, markets are destroyed by government interference, not propped up by it. Your own example is a case in point: were it not for the government making laws in favor of entrenched companies, Apple couldn't sue the people trying to get around its market manipulation.

> You just prefer that governments help enforce trusts and destroy competition that those trusts denote as unfair.

This is a grossly unfair mischaracterization of the post you are replying to. Bad show, old chap.

Apple doesn't _need_ to sue people. They can just stop distributing their apps.

That's it. No "government monopoly" or anything, just regular commercial monopolism.