| ▲ | amarant 3 hours ago |
| What is it like in the US these days? I'm on the outside (occasionally) looking in, and it looks like something out of European history class! The ice seem to have roughly the same priorities and roughly the same methodology as the SA had in the beginning. Is stuff really as bad as it looks or are media somehow exaggerating things? I mean I saw the pretti videos and it certainly seems to corroborate what media is saying. But I'm curious to hear Americans view on matters? As a European I'm also somewhat confused. I always thought that the reason the second amendment was made into such a big deal was because Americans felt they needed to be able to protect themselves in case the government ran amok. Isn't this the exact scenario those arguments were talking about? Have all the second amendment supporters been employed by ice/agree with what they're doing, or was it just empty talk? Stuff seems rough over there, if they actually are, take care everybody! Also please tell me how things actually stand inside the US cause it's making very little sense right now. |
|
| ▲ | AngryData a minute ago | parent | next [-] |
| People aren't shooting yet because they know it will turn into a blood bath and should only be used as a last resort. Also as bad as it is in some areas, vast swaths of the US are still only really seeing this in the news. I think the outcome of whats going on in Minnesota will be a sign of whats to come so we won't be waiting long. If citizens start shooting at government employees though, it will be chaos, the US population has had a VERY negative attitude about the government for a long time now. |
|
| ▲ | thaumaturgy 8 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| People are experiencing wildly different Americas depending on their circumstances and level of political involvement. If you're a tech worker and you still have a job and you think AI is pretty cool and you don't follow news very closely, things seem okay...ish. You are maybe dimly aware of some social problems, but they're all somebody else's problems. If you're one of the many many thousands of people who have been abducted by federalized lunatics, or you have a child or family member in one of our concentration camps, things seem urgently and unimaginably bad. If you're politically involved, things seem tenuous, at best. You likely know someone who either feels justifiably terrified by what's going on, or someone whose life has been seriously impacted by it. I've spent several months successfully combating one of YC's contributions to all this mess. Tonight, federal law enforcement fired pepper rounds, flashbangs, and tear gas into a crowd of protestors who were noisy -- not violent, not even causing property damage, just noisy. One of the officers aimed the tear gas weapon directly at a protestor's head and caused a serious head injury (the kind that causes convulsions and foaming at the mouth after impact). And, they'll get away with that. The local police department was flying half a dozen drones directly over this, but they are only there to surveil and look for an excuse to put on riot gear. There were an assortment of reporters there, but most of them have editors or owners that won't run much of a story about any of it. A few politicians showed up, but they made a short speech and then left immediately. The building where this all happened is in a city center, so, just a block away, life and traffic continues as normal and most people are entirely unaware. So that's also why nobody's really been making an organized 2A effort either. For most people, this isn't "real", in the sense that it isn't something they're experiencing, and for those that are experiencing it, they're trying to walk a tightrope that resists the current administration without spiraling into a widespread civil war. |
|
| ▲ | heavyset_go 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Is stuff really as bad as it looks or are media somehow exaggerating things? If you think what you've seen is bad, consider how bad the stuff you don't see is, and then consider how bad it is for those who aren't the type to post on HN. |
| |
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD 5 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Also consider that there are 340 million people in the US. With that sort of population size, you can construct whatever narrative you want out of daily video clips of 1-in-a-million events. >the type to post on HN. When's the last time you saw a Trump supporter on this site? The userbase here is considerably further left than a very left-wing state such as California. That will very much be reflected in what gets posted here. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46791909 |
|
|
| ▲ | westpfelia 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The news media is not saying a lot of what is happening. So if anything you are missing some of the insanity. |
|
| ▲ | idle_zealot 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Isn't this the exact scenario those arguments were talking about? Have all the second amendment supporters been employed by ice/agree with what they're doing, or was it just empty talk? It was never really a practical idea, more a sort of latent threat that has proven to be ineffective. Also, yeah, the "don't tread on me" folks mostly aren't very principaled and don't mind authoritarian actions so long as they're dressed up right. Obama wants a public healthcare option? How dare the government institute Death Panels to decide who live or dies! ICE shoot random protestors? That's what they deserve for "impeding" and "assaulting" law enforcement. The Second Amendment was written so that the US could avoid having a standing federal army and quickly gather up defense forces from States as necessary when attacked. It was thought that having a standing army would lead to bad incentives and militarism. Just like the Executive branch only has enumerated powers, with all main governing functions belonging to Congress. The founders were worried about vesting too much power in one man, so made the President pretty weak. Of course, we've transmogrified ourselves into a nation primed for militarism and authoritarianism by slowly but surely concentrating power into one station. Exactly what the Constitution was written to prevent. I guess they did a bad job. |
| |
| ▲ | pseudohadamard 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | As a footnote, it was also written at a time when a bunch of guys with muskets could face down another bunch of guys with muskets. When one side has tanks and attack helicopters and training and outnumbers you a hundred to one it doesn't really work any more. | | |
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That would explain why it was so easy for the US to suppress insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan... It's actually rather difficult to think of tyrannical regimes which persisted against an armed citizenry in the long term. | | |
| ▲ | vintermann an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Is armed with knives enough? Presumably it isn't, and you'd need a certain minimum level of technological parity with your tyrants. Presumably that also isn't fixed. So even if rifles might have been sufficient in the early US even though the government had cannons, rifles may not be sufficient when the government has chemical weapons and armored cars. So where's the industrial base which makes the weapons? Or the money to buy the weapons? For Iraq, Afghanistan, and for that matter in lots of conflicts the US weren't involved in (or were involved in on the anti-government side!) the answer seems straightforward enough: in foreign countries which also don't like your government. Without a bunch of neighbors and rival powers which really didn't want the US in Iraq/Afghanistan, could the insurgents have done much? Who do you propose should arm the resistance in the US, if government supported "police" paramilitaries run amok? (Let's for the sake of argument not get into whether that has happened yet). It's going to have to be quite an impressive level of support, too, to stand up against systems developed precisely against that sort of eventuality and battle-tested in the US' sphere of influence. | | |
| ▲ | AnthonyMouse 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > Is armed with knives enough? It depends on the numbers. Do they have 100,000 guys with guns but you have a hundred million with knives? Then you have a chance. But your chances improve a lot if your side is starting off with something more effective than that. > Presumably it isn't, and you'd need a certain minimum level of technological parity with your tyrants. You don't need parity, you need a foothold to leverage into more. > So where's the industrial base which makes the weapons? Or the money to buy the weapons? In a civil war, you take the domestic facilities and equipment by force and then use them. But first you need the capacity to do that. Can 10,000 guys with knives take a military base guarded by a thousand guys with guns? Probably not. Can they if they all have guns? Yeah, probably. Then the government has to decide if they're going to vaporize the facility when you do that. If they don't, you get nukes. If they do, now you have a mechanism to make them blow up their own infrastructure by feigning attacks. And so on. | | |
| ▲ | vintermann 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > Can they if they all have guns? Yeah, probably. Heck no, they can't. Even if they could, the government's advantage isn't just in weapons. Long before you'd get your 10000 people with their gun safe stash together, they'd know exactly who you were and what you were planning. I think your proposal reads like bad power fantasy fiction. You can resist a powerful authoritarian/occupying government with force, but not without a lot of foreign backing - like in Iran right now - and I don't think you are prepared to ask the Russians for help. It would of course open a huge can of worms if you did, and you'd be right to ask if the world where you win with such support will even be better than the world where you lose. | | |
| ▲ | AnthonyMouse 21 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > Heck no, they can't. Well that settles it then. > Long before you'd get your 10000 people with their gun safe stash together, they'd know exactly who you were and what you were planning. It's almost like anonymity and private communications tech belongs next to weapons on the list of things needed to resist authoritarianism. > not without a lot of foreign backing Why does it require any foreign backing whatsoever? You're not going to do it if you're three people, but a civil war is when some double digit percentage of the country is on the other side. You don't think that's enough people to supply substantial domestic resources? |
|
| |
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD 40 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Knives are basically obsolete technology in military terms. Firearms are not obsolete; that's why almost every soldier (or "paramilitary") carries one. Your technological parity point is technically correct, but it doesn't really apply here. There are more privately owned guns than people in the US. We are already profusely armed. | | |
| ▲ | vintermann 20 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I'm not contesting that you're armed. I'm not contesting that guns can still be "useful". But not in resisting a government with anti-"insurgence" drones battle tested against various levels of resistance from Palestine to Ukraine to Afghanistan. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | renewiltord 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you don’t care about how many you kill, these kinds of insurgencies can be ended. I don’t think the US Armed Forces could be convinced to attack their fellow Americans but if they did it would be worth remembering that the Warsaw Uprising ended poorly for the uprisers. This is not like Ukraine where there are lots of underground manufacturing facilities. If you tried building drones to stop US tanks and IFVs then the Californians would tell you that your factory needs to first go through environmental review. By the time the review is done the war will be lost. | |
| ▲ | moi2388 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That however is a political issue, not a military one. Given free rein the military absolutely can do that. | | |
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD an hour ago | parent [-] | | If the US military wasn't willing to simply flatten cities all over Iraq and Afghanistan, why would you expect them to do that in their own country to their own homes and family members? | | |
| ▲ | asksomeoneelse 13 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Because Iraq or Afghanistan weren't threatening the man in power. Just take a look at what is currently happening in Iran if you wonder what happens when the local authority fears the crowd. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | kislotnik 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Have you seen expensive tanks and helicopters being taken out by 500$ drones? No? I have a surprise for you | |
| ▲ | DeepSeaTortoise 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It also applied to other things existing at that time, like warships, canister shot in cannons or machine guns. |
| |
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I see a lot from the left about how right-wingers are supposedly hypocritical on gun control. However, concrete examples of hypocrisy are rarely provided. In terms of actual concrete statements, what I'm seeing from gun rights people like Thomas Massie and the NRA is consistent with previous stances: https://xcancel.com/NRA/status/2015227627464728661#m https://xcancel.com/RepThomasMassie/status/20155711073281848... I'd say the left is actually much more hypocritical. Just a few years ago they had essentially no issue with the government taking everyone's guns. Now suddenly they understand the value of an armed citizenry as a final last resort against tyranny, something the right has understood for years, and then they start calling the right "hypocritical"... | | |
| ▲ | epistasis an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | The NRA is not a very honest or good gun association, their immediate statement was quite different: > “For months, radical progressive politicians like Tim Walz have incited violence against law enforcement officers who are simply trying to do their jobs. Unsurprisingly, these calls to dangerously interject oneself into legitimate law-enforcement activities have ended in violence, tragically resulting in injuries and fatalities. https://x.com/NRA/status/2015224606680826205?ref_src=twsrc%5... (they then go on to say "let's withhold judgement until there's an investigation" despite them passing quite extreme judgement, with a direct lie, and getting their judgment extremely wrong when there was lots of video showing it wrong when they posted...) In light of their large change of attitude, the initial critiques were quite correct. In another Minnesota case, they refused to defend a gun owner that was shot for having a gun, despite doing everything right when stopped by police. Other gun associations besides the NRA have been more principled and less partisan. Rep. Massie is barely a Republican, he's pretty much the only one willing to go against Trump on anything. Right now the Republican party is defined by one thing only: slavish obedience to Trump. For Republicans' sake, and the sake of the Republic, I hope that changes soon. | | |
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD an hour ago | parent [-] | | I don't see inconsistency between the two NRA statements. Your interpretation seems imaginative/unsupported. Gun rights people understand that owning a gun comes with certain responsibilities. The accusation of "hypocrisy" seems to be based on a cartoon understanding of gun rights from people on the left. Find me a gun rights person who previously claimed that resisting arrest while armed is all fun and games. https://policelawnews.substack.com/p/cbp-involved-alex-prett... | | |
| ▲ | mindslight 34 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Always being able to come up with some exception [0] doesn't mean that you're not being hypocritical, it just means that you've tricked yourself into being unable to see it. For another incident that resulted in a widespread display of hypocrisy, look at the public reactions to what happened when Kenneth Walker exercised his right to night time home defense - one of the basic scenarios the NRA is always rallying around. But I'm sure you've settled on some coping excuse for that one as well. The real thing you need to understand is that this fascist movement will always find some grounds to characterize its targets as worthy of othering. If (when) you get tripped up by it, no amount of conforming or having supported it is going to redeem you in the mind of the mob. Rather it's going to be people just like yourself condemning you. [0] this one seemingly based on an outright shameless lie of "resisting arrest" | | |
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD 22 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I have no opinion on Kenneth Walker. I'm just annoyed by what I see on social media -- people claiming hypocrisy without any supporting evidence. The flip side of your "exception" point is that you have to actually understand what the person said, and what they believe, before you claim hypocrisy... something that lefty activists in the US largely have no interest in doing. | | |
| ▲ | mindslight 14 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > I'm just annoyed by what I see on social media -- people claiming hypocrisy Fixed that for you. (If you had made a concrete point, I would have sought to understand and address it. Instead you basically just did a wordy version of "nuh-uh") | | |
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | All I want people to do is link to evidence of hypocrisy when they claim it. Argue with an actual person instead of your hallucination of them. Was that too much to ask? |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | guelo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Massie is the odd man out out of 1000s of Republican politicians in being willing to publicly criticize his own party. He is very not typical. Everybody else marches in lockstep with whatever insanity trump puts out. | | | |
| ▲ | wsatb 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's not hard to find examples. "You cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It's that simple." - Kash Patel “I don't know of any peaceful protester that shows up with a gun and ammunition rather than a sign." - Kristi Noem “With that being said, you can’t have guns. You can’t walk in with guns. You just can’t.” -Donald Trump | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | tastyfreeze 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Use of 2nd amendment rights to combat government overreach is an outright declaration of rebellion. Cross that line and you are no longer playing rebel. If you dont have enough people behind you it will not go well. |
| |
| ▲ | mullingitover an hour ago | parent [-] | | The second amendment as a serious option for a regime reset button was always a fantasy. This federal government would happily take a lesson from the Chechen wars and use ballistic missiles against a rebelling city if the chips were down. Any 2A fans have their own Patriot missile defense systems? No? | | |
| ▲ | youarentrightjr an hour ago | parent [-] | | > The second amendment as a serious option for a regime reset button was always a fantasy.
This federal government would happily take a lesson from the Chechen wars and use ballistic missiles against a rebelling city if the chips were down. Any 2A fans have their own Patriot missile defense systems? No? If it's that easy, why did we spend 20 years in Afghanistan only to suffer defeat by goat herders holding AK-47s? A quick review of the last 100 years will educate you on the viability of asymmetric warfare. | | |
| ▲ | mullingitover an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | The NATO forces defeated the Taliban in a timeframe that could be measured in hours. The remaining years were an exercise in nation building, there was never “defeat.” The military simply isn’t the right tool to lift a nation out of poverty and eventually the voters got bored. In Vietnam, the US was fighting an army backed by the Soviet Union and China that had anti-aircraft and artillery. No, the US insurgency would turn into a Grozny unless the insurgents get backing from China or some other serious player. | | |
| ▲ | rbanffy 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I don’t think it’d be easy to get a Chinese ABM to Minneapolis without anyone noticing. What could happen in this scenario would be either local military defecting or guerrilla warfare while the US military targets them from afar. You can easily bomb anyone back to Stone Age in hours, but taking control of the ground can be a lot more challenging if the locals don’t cooperate. Anyway, a full-on civil war is a very unlikely - and undesirable - scenario. |
| |
| ▲ | bigDinosaur an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There are plenty of examples of asymmetric warfare where the stronger party crushed the weaker one. WW2 was full of such examples. People point to Afghanistan and Vietnam as if they apply in every situation, for some bizarre reason (I assume motivated reasoning). | |
| ▲ | seanmcdirmid 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | The rebels (against the American regime) were all rural, ballistic missiles weren’t very effective when your enemy is wandering around the desert coming in out of rural Pakistan. To get rid of the libs…they live in dense cities, trump would just have to lob a missile at Minneapolis, Denver, Portland, NYC, Chicago, Seattle, Austin, etc…it’s a war he can actually win quickly. Heck, why do you think it’s so easy for him to sh*t stir right now with a few strategic ICE surges. It’s easy when 90% of the left in Minnesota lives in one urban area. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | heurist 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's confusing and messy, like most of American history. |
|
| ▲ | gmerc 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Most cosplayers exit when they meet a real villain |
|
| ▲ | qwesda 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm wondering pretty much the same thing ... |
|
| ▲ | soulofmischief 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's bad, we are living under Hitler 2.0 in every single sense of the word. He admires Hitler and says he keeps Hitler's books by his nightstand. That said, do not rely on a single or even a few Americans for insight into what is going on, as you might get a wildly different perspective from each one, as a consequence of the billions of dollars put into generational propaganda and subliminal mind control out here. We are a nation divided. |
|
| ▲ | directevolve 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Minneapolis has 0.1% of the total USA population. It is to the USA as Dresden, Lisbon, or Genoa is to the EU in terms of population. While ICE is mass deporting people nationwide, the murders of citizens and general mayhem they’re perpetrating are primarily just in Minneapolis. 2A supporters are mixed. Some genuinely outraged at the gov, some just making up reasons to support Trump anyway. Following the definition of conservatism, liberals are the group the law binds but does not protect, and they are the group the law protects but does not bind. In the US, Republicans managed to stack the judicial system with acolytes in a well organized, long term operation over years. They broke rules to steal Supreme Court seats, giving them a majority. They control all branches of government. In that situation, the president has massive power to do what he wants. So he is. Trump doesn’t really seem to care about any issue really. He’s not much of an ideologue. But his advisors certainly are. Stephen Miller is an open fascist who’s playing Trump like a fiddle and loving every minute of the chaos. But for most of those of us lucky enough to be citizens, most of the time, we’re just dealing with institutional dysfunction exacerbated by Federal dysfunction. Funding cuts, broken commitments, uncertainty. We also are all seeing the Federal government pre-emptively brand the citizens it’s new gunning down in the street every two weeks or so “domestic terrorists” and posing with signs saying “one of ours, all of yours,” and so on. So it’s very clear that the government is now building right wing paramilitary forces to try and intimidate us. Clearly that’s not working too well in Minnesota, however! Liberal Americans overall are:
1. Disgusted with Trump et al
2. Keeping relatively calm and carrying on, because he genuinely did win the popular vote in a free and fair election
3. Figuring out constructive ways to deal with ICE, pressure the Democratic Party to pick better candidates, and thinking about how to protect elections in 2026 and 2028. On a day to day basis, life feels normal where I live, for me, for now. |
| |
| ▲ | Epa095 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What you describe seems to fit the term 'Dual State', and you live your day to day life in the normative state. I hope foe your sake you don't get much contact with the prerogative one. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2025/05/trump-e... | | | |
| ▲ | yolo3000 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It doesn't feel like you keep calm 'because he won the elections'. It's either that citizens can't do much in the US, fear of getting killed is real especially when disobeying police orders, or, you aren't too affected by Trump's actions to act. |
|
|
| ▲ | epistasis 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Is stuff really as bad as it looks or are media somehow exaggerating things? I mean I saw the pretti videos and it certainly seems to corroborate what media is saying. But I'm curious to hear Americans view on matters? The US media is downplaying things because they are terrified of Trump, who now has either direct or indirect control of most of it. If you're talking about EU media, I can't assess, but I did see a clip of an Italian news crew getting harassed in Minneapolis that's fairly accurate. It's bad. Really bad. I never thought this would happen in the US. But it's also inept. Really inept. Minnesota is super-majority white, but has taken great pride in being a home for refugee communities, and has gained many from around the world. Minnesotans are, of all the places I've lived in the world, the most open-hearted, caring, and upright moral I've encountered as a group. Hard winters make people trust community. The Georgy Floyd murders, and the riots afterwards, have made communities very strong as they had to watch out for each other, there were no police that were going to come. For this area with hundreds of thousands people, there are only 600 cops, but 3000 ICE/CBP agents swarming it, a HUGE chunk of their forces. Yet people self-organized to watch out for their schools and their neighbors. Churches serve as central places for people to volunteer to deliver meals to families that can not leave the house due to the racialize abduction of people. Several police chiefs have held news conferences where they say in so many words "You know I'm not a liburul but my officers with brown skin are all getting harassed by ICE when they're off duty, until the show that they are cops, and that's pretty bad." A Republican candidate for Governor withdrew his candidacy because he felt he couldn't be part of a political party that was doing such racialized violence against his own people, and his job was literally to be a defense lawyer to cops accused of wrongdoing! The deaths are so tragic, but because Minnesotans have been so well organized, so stoic, so non-violent, it fully exposes ICE/CBD for the political terror campaign that they are. That the entire endeavor has nothing to do with enforcing the law, it's all about punishing Minnesota for being Minnesota, for its politics, for its people. If the legal deployment of cameras and whistles and insults and yells is enough to defeat masked goons who wave guns in people faces, assault non-violent people with pepper sprays directly to the eyes, and tear-gas canisters thrown at daycares, then these stupid SA-wannabes are not going to win. I live in a coastal California bubble that's even whiter than Minnesota, but here we are all rooting for Minnesota. I was talking to another parent today at the elementary school, an immigrant from Spain, a doctor, whose husband is from Minnesota. They are rethinking their choice of staying in the US. The second amendment thing was always a charade. There are a few people that think it's for protection from the government, but what they really mean is it's for shooting liberals. There's no grander principle. There are a bunch of people that enjoy guns as a hobby, and support the 2nd amendment for that. But we all know that the time for armed defense against the government is only when you're in a bunker in woods or when you're storming the capital to overturn an election because you've been tricked into saying it's a fraudulent election. They are buffoons, as the Nazis were, but they are very unpopular buffoons and I think the past week shows that after a few more years of grand struggle, normal americans will win. It will be hard. We need to have truth and reconciliation afterwards, and the lack of that after the Civil War and after January 6 are huge causes in today's struggles. I'm just glad Minnesota is defeating ICE/CBP, as many states would give in to violence faster, and many states would give up faster. |
| |
|
| ▲ | jaimsam an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | Empact 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [flagged] |
| |
| ▲ | hans_castorp 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is simply not true. Some people are investigated because they spread lies, insults and threats. Things that would be investigated (and punished) as well, if done "off line". The freedom of speech does not mean "freedom to harass, threat or insult people". The oppression of free speech seems to be happening much more in the USA, where you are not allowed to criticize the politics of the ruling party any more. | | | |
| ▲ | katdork 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This misses the point of how "deportation", snatching of those from communities and decision-making for whom is illegal is actually occurring, and how people are being snatched with disregard to their actual state as a citizen, resident or otherwise of the United States of America. When facial recognition is said to outrank any other proof, such as a birth certificate, one cannot claim to be operating in good faith when one allows for fallible systems to decide the lives of American citizenry, encourages false imprisonment and allows for violence to be recklessly committed against people who were guilty of no crime at all. (also, the United States and Canada are alike in their statuses as countries formed of immigrants; we close the door now simply because we feel those coming today are ineducated or don't fit our racial preferences? No different than was done to Chinese people say a hundred years prior.) | | |
| ▲ | Empact 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Is any law enforcement guaranteed to be exactly correct? No, because every person is fallible, and every system is made up of fallible people. This is why we separate arrest (police) from trial (judge) and judgment (jury), to mitigate those risks. To malign a system because it is imperfect is to be unrealistic. Surely, we should minimize those harms, but they are not a reason to abdicate our laws. | | |
| |
| ▲ | ithkuil an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Deportation of illegal immigrants happened in the previous administrations and nothing like the current chaos unfolded. I grant that some people protesting against the raids are likely doing that because they don't want illegals to be deported, but I suspect most of the pushback is against the way this whole thing has been set up and the way agents handled the encounters with protesters so far, leading towards a spiral of distrust and a polarization of the issue. There seems to be an indication that many of the ICE agents have been insufficiently trained to perform police work in a proper and safe way. and instead behave very aggressively. The abuse of racial profiling is making non-white citizens (including native Americans!) feel unsafe too. To make things worse, there is a loud group of people who are cheering the though guys from the sidelines/armchairs. People who share those concerns are not necessarily pro-illegal immigration. I know things can be done differently because they have been done differently. But in this case, one political movement is leveraging the deportation rhetoric to rile up their base, providing another political movement the ammonito to call them tyrannical and riling up their base, which in turn causes the first movement to justify their aggressiveness as counterinsurgence. This doesn't lead to a good place and it has nothing to do with the fact that the country deserves a sane immigration policy. The current immigration situation is utterly broken, but it has become such over time (and has many complicated facets) but the idea that this can be fixed in a haste by applying lunt force is the product of a new low point in politics. | |
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Note the extreme downvoting on the comment I'm replying to. HN has a strong left-wing bias. Don't expect the views expressed on this site to be at all representative of the American public. I consider myself a center-left moderate (never voted for Trump). From my perspective this site is pretty close to being a far-left echo chamber. | | |
| ▲ | Epa095 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | FYI, as a center left from a European perspective that is a beautiful picture of just how right-leaning American politics is. The Democrats is such a big tent it contains pretty much the complete political spectrum in Europe, but for the actuall politics they have been doing, at least regarding economics (excluding identity politics) they are pretty solid right / center right from a European perspective. | |
| ▲ | katdork an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I would probably argue the opposite, given that Y Combinator is a venture capital firm. This would be more true for Lobsters than here. (Edit: to go further, it's like... ok, if HN is far-left, what does that make Bluesky? What does that make the Fediverse? It feels almost reductive to compress the range of HN onwards down to "far-left".) | | |
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD an hour ago | parent [-] | | Discussion on this site has little to do with Y Combinator. You see people railing against big tech billionaires every day here. Bluesky is pretty close to being fellow travelers for the userbase here. If you do a comment search for "bluesky" you can see most comments are neutral or positive. HN might be a bit more genteel in how they discuss things, but there are many users here whose politics are pretty similar to what you find on bluesky. |
|
| |
| ▲ | rsingel 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] |
|
|
| ▲ | sawjet an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Outside of a couple of outlier cities, is business as usual. Deportations have been occurring for much longer than Trump has been president. It's just in the news now because Democrats want to make a spectacle out of it. Most people want illegals removed. |
|
| ▲ | abhinai 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| To put things in perspective, US is a massive country. All this news is coming from one tier 3 city. (Roughly speaking LA, NYC etc being tier 1. Seattle, Dallas etc being tier 2) |
| |
| ▲ | slg 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | While being the focus, Minnesota is not the only place it's happening. For example, ICE took at least 15 people in the Los Angeles area today[1]. That article is from a local food publication that has largely shifted to covering all ICE behavior in the greater LA area. It's a good place to get a better picture of the kind of stuff that has just become background noise to the degree that it doesn't make the news elsewhere. People could also throw a few bucks their way if they think documenting this is important. And I'll point to a single example from 13 hours ago[2] for the "the deporting of illegal immigrants is not oppression" type of people like that other commenter. Just a video of a nameless person, taken who knows where, for who knows what, screaming and crying out. This just doesn't make the news, but it's happening countless times every day all over the country in the name of the American people. [1] - https://lataco.com/daily-memo-january-27th-border-patrol-att... [2] - https://www.instagram.com/p/DUBjokvEnWh/ | |
| ▲ | tantalor 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Twin cities are 16th largest metro, between Tampa/St. Petersburg and Seattle/Tacoma. | | |
| ▲ | abhinai 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah it’s a slightly blurry line. What metric are you using? I’d say Seattle is way ahead of Minneapolis in terms of economic influence. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | swaits an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > What is it like in the US these days? For the average American citizen, status quo. For the scofflaws and illegal immigrants, the realization that accountability for their actions might be right around the corner must be unnerving. |