I have no opinion on Kenneth Walker. I'm just annoyed by what I see on social media -- people claiming hypocrisy without any supporting evidence. The flip side of your "exception" point is that you have to actually understand what the person said, and what they believe, before you claim hypocrisy... something that lefty activists in the US largely have no interest in doing.

▲

mindslight 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> I'm just annoyed by what I see on social media -- people claiming hypocrisy

Fixed that for you.

(If you had made a concrete point, I would have sought to understand and address it. Instead you basically just did a wordy version of "nuh-uh")

▲

0xDEAFBEAD 2 hours ago | parent [-]

All I want people to do is link to evidence of hypocrisy when they claim it. Argue with an actual person instead of your hallucination of them. Was that too much to ask?

▲

mindslight an hour ago | parent [-]

You say hallucination, I say reasonable prediction based on past behavior.

It wasn't too much for you to ask, but apparently my response was too much for you to handle. I brought up Kenneth Walker precisely because that was a situation for which the dust settled long ago and so we don't need to make such predictions. But to this you merely said "I have no opinion"

You then went on to poison the discussion with your own preemptive "I'm not listening" nonsense - "something that lefty activists in the US largely have no interest in doing"

Perhaps it might shock you, but some of us opposed to this regime are actual principled libertarians. I'm a gun owner who actually believes in the natural right to keep and bear arms. My opinion of the NRA is that its main function is fundraising from the gullible, which is why they can't avoid leaning into the culture war bullshit.

▲

0xDEAFBEAD an hour ago | parent [-]

>You say hallucination, I say reasonable prediction based on past behavior.

You're also welcome to make a prediction, but label it as a prediction rather than a statement of fact.

▲

mindslight an hour ago | parent [-]

Apparently you only address non-substantive points that you can nitpick. So I guess we're done, unless you'd like to go back and do your homework.

	▲	0xDEAFBEAD 39 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		To me, this is the substantive point. It's about intellectual honesty. That's the key thing for me. From my perspective, most of what you're saying is either (a) not substantive/outright disingenuous, or (b) I don't have much to add. If there is a particular point you really want me to respond to, you're welcome to highlight it and I will consider responding (but honestly probably not, for the reasons I gave).