Remix.run Logo
Europe wants to end its dangerous reliance on US internet technology(theconversation.com)
117 points by DyslexicAtheist 2 hours ago | 87 comments
Anonyneko an hour ago | parent | next [-]

>In the Swedish coastal city of Helsingborg, for example, a one-year project is testing how various public services would function in the scenario of a digital blackout

Russia has been doing these blackout exercises for many years now all across the country, forcing major services to make serious changes to their infrastructure. I assume similar things happen regularly in Iran and China. Europe is incredibly late to the game, and doing random experiments in small towns is not even nearly enough. Weaning off government services is also not enough, physical networks have to be prepared for it, commercial services have to follow, and the general populace has to be incentivized to use them. Otherwise, the damage from a blackout will still be unsustainable. It doesn't sound democratic, but this should be treated as a matter of national security. That is, if self-reliance is an actual goal - waiting for things to possibly blow over is still an option, but this is one of those matters where I believe half-measures are worse than both of the extremes.

kemiller an hour ago | parent [-]

Ironically, Russia probing defenses in Europe is functioning like Chaos Monkey — revealing vulnerabilities and triggering hardening.

ls612 35 minutes ago | parent [-]

It’s certainly doing the first, not so sure about the second.

Nextgrid 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

The main vulnerability of the Western world isn't technical, it's that we voluntarily surrendered our communication and social fabrics to advertising-driven businesses that will happily host and promote anything as long as it generates engagement. This makes it trivial for foreign agents to sway public opinion where as back in the day influencing media required actual capital and connections.

Unfortunately, a lot of our own people (and especially politicians) make money out of this situation so there's very little incentive to change this. Just look at the reaction every time regulations designed to curtail Big Tech ad-driven monopolies (EU DMA, GDPR, etc) are discussed. Our greed is what makes us vulnerable.

terminalshort 16 minutes ago | parent [-]

Who is the "we" that you think surrendered control here? Freedom of the press necessitates that anyone can publish freely even if what they publish is foreign propaganda.

Nextgrid 4 minutes ago | parent [-]

I wasn't talking about press, I was talking about how ad-driven social media became effectively the only communication tool and we still refuse to enact/enforce effective regulation to curb its hegemony.

whynotmaybe 29 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

The second isn't publicly promoted.

wolvoleo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In Holland I see a lot of defeatist attitude. "US big tech is so entrenched we'll never get away". "European cloud will never be good enough". "There's nothing like Microsoft 365". At my work they don't even want to think about alternatives.

I think they hope that MAGA will just blow over somehow. I don't see that happening.

tchalla an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Everyone has been going gung ho about Canadian PM speech but the banger one for me personally is the Belgian PM. He said it best “Being a happy vassal state is one thing, being a miserable slave is another”. Europe deserves every bit what’s coming to them.

OKRainbowKid 42 minutes ago | parent [-]

Can you elaborate how this statement led you to your conclusion?

tchalla 32 minutes ago | parent [-]

I don’t understand your question. I’m assuming you are asking about the part “Europe deserves”. It’s simple really - for decades now Europe has been relying on US for military support. It’s a cardinal sin to do so if one wants an equivalent seat at the negotiating table. But the EU just can’t agree amongst themselves. Mercosur takes 30 years, India defence agreement has taken 20. The warning signs were there during 2016 but conveniently brushed. EU either acts together for the common good even if they don’t like something or continues to be bureaucratic, irrelevant old person. It’s slow agony at the moment.

rtsil 16 minutes ago | parent [-]

The EU couldn't agree amongst themselves because the US (and its biggest vassal, the UK when it was in the EU) did everything to prevent such agreement.

We'll see what the States that were the most against any form of common European defense will do now that the US has proven unreliable. And if they are still under the delusion that the current US policies will go away, then it's time for Two-Speed Europe.

terminalshort 13 minutes ago | parent [-]

Don't blame this on the UK. UK leave vote was a few months before the 2016 election, so the timing is convenient. But let's not pretend that it was anything but complacency (that was shattered by Trump) is to blame here.

Telaneo an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd imagine this attitude would start to disappear as soon as alternatives start being used. It's already happening to some extent, but it needs to trickle down into the general populace. The relevant names just aren't in people's minds yet (although there definitely are areas where there aren't exact 1-to-1 replacements available).

ummonk 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It’s amazing how complacent and weak-willed the European populace and political leaders are. Quite the contrast to Canada.

Spivak an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Genuinely, what's the sell of Microsoft 365? I get MS Word, Excel whatever lock in but what is their cloud actually adding that can't be substituted?

Email, chat, video calling, and file storage? All products that have plenty of competitors. We went with 365 only because it was dirt cheap.

I would think weening off Windows and the AD "Entra" stack would be a lot harder than commodity office software but at least they can self host that.

Sharlin an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It's adding the property that it's an all-in-one turnkey solution. Which is an extremely attractive proposition compared to having a dozen separate tools. And to paraphrase the old adage, nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft.

kaveh_h 31 minutes ago | parent [-]

Well maybe the old adage need to change

skocznymroczny an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The sell is that my manager can send an Excel spreadsheet to everyone and everyone can open the spreadsheet and edit it at the same times while seeing everyone else do their edits. What's the non-MS non-Google solution to this?

Telaneo 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Open-Xchange supports collaborative editing of spreadsheets. Mailbox.org uses that for their email service, and you get access to their online office suite when you subscribe. I can't speak to the quality of the shared editing, but their online office suite is fine for basic stuff.

mjhay an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Anyone can edit it and it also might get randomly corrupted. It’s crap, especially if some people are on Macs.

Hikikomori 33 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Zoho.

esperent an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> what's the sell of Microsoft 365

> We went with 365 only because it was dirt cheap

You answered your own question.

Yoric an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

And frankly, MS Word is really bad. So are pretty much of all their services.

Not sure whether Excel is still good.

terminalshort 10 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Bad how? Works just fine for everything I have ever needed to do with it. I'm not a power user, though, but my point is neither are 95% of users and the basic functionality is just fine.

Telaneo an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Excel is really good for the wizards and for that one spreadsheet full of macros written by a wizard, which thus can't be ported over to Libreoffice or anything else. Many of those probably should Just™ be made into actual databases, but Excel is a lot more approachable than those, so you end up with giant spreadsheets instead.

For everybody else, Libreoffice is fine as far as functionality is concerned. UI might be another story, but that's worth getting over anyway, especially since a lot of people for whom this is a problem, would also have problems with getting away from Windows as a whole, just from buttons moving and things being different in general.

astrospective 30 minutes ago | parent [-]

Porting involved Excel sheets into web apps has been a decent chunk of my dev career.

hmry an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Being good is one thing, being compatible with existing files full of VBA macros is another.

Although MS themselves apparently don't realize that, considering how they push the web version which doesn't support them?

SpicyLemonZest 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think you're misreading the source of the defeatism. It's clear what European leaders should do if they want to compete with US big tech. They should sit down with corporate leaders at Spotify, Ericsson, ASML, etc. and talk though what reforms are necessary for Europe to start minting unicorns as rapidly as the Americans can.

But European leaders haven't been willing to do this, perceiving (I think correctly) that European citizens won't tolerate the idea of asking rich CEOs for regulatory advice or making the creation of billionaires a policy goal. So instead they focus on the kind of pointless efforts described in the source article, where government agencies endlessly chase their tails on standards and objectives.

To the eternal frustration of governments and advocates around the world, there's no argument for why you should use domestic products that can adequately substitute for high-quality domestic products people want to use.

api 6 minutes ago | parent [-]

The answer is simple: simplify and streamline all the bureaucracy.

Complexity is a regressive tax. It disproportionately penalizes small ventures and entrepreneurs who don’t have whole departments of people to deal with it. The effect is to prevent the formation of new companies. Large incumbents are able to deal with it, so it actually protects them.

lateforwork an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Even if MAGA goes away in 3 years when Trump (hopefully) goes away, the US will remain an oligarchy. Billionaire's interests comes before citizens' interests. This is because of a supreme court decision that allowed billionaires to buy elections. For this reason, even though I am American, I'd like to see European alternatives to US apps and services, because they are more likely to serve my interests.

terminalshort 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

This is a tired old trope that really has no basis in reality. There have been no large scale policy changes favoring billionaires since the campaign finance laws changed. In two out of the last 3 elections, the major corporate money backed candidate lost. The government is run by the 24 hour news cycle and the attention economy, not by the decree of billionaires. We operate firmly under the tyranny of the majority.

okanat 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The big picture isn't that different in Europe. Most EU countries are also oligarchies, just with a lot more bloody histories and national traumas. The social safety net is kept to the level of remembrance of those traumas. Once people start forgetting them, the oligarchs will take away the rights one by one.

The response to US betrayal is weak because our oligarchs own lots and lots of investments in the US. Our banks invest in US treasuries and especially in the US real estate market. They then leverage those US investments against normal people in the EU and consolidate more and more power (and assets) and blame normal people for not having investments or not working enough. They are the ones who take away EU GDP and park it in US investment tools. Forming businesses is more risky in many EU countries due to extremely conservative policies of those same banks who prefer US investments instead.

Archelaos 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The problem are not Trump or the billionaires, but the majority of the American people who support them. They knew what they were getting.

lateforwork 4 minutes ago | parent [-]

No they didn't know what they were getting. They didn't and can't look beyond the price of eggs at their local Kroger. To a large extend this election was decided by the price of eggs.

Hikikomori 30 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

It likely isn't over with him. Trump is just the frontman and possibly fall guy for project 2025/federalist society. They are his entire cabinet and their plan was to replace all government workers with their own loyal people.

thisislife2 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Everyone wants to, and not just from the US, but China too. Digital imperialism is real but nobody is confident yet how to effectively fight it. India especially is kind of trapped because our IT service industry is deeply entwined with the US and our government doesn't know how to safely untangle it from the US without harming our economy.

nxm 5 minutes ago | parent [-]

No they don't... most people just want cheap stuff that works.

pveierland an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The tax authority in Norway alone employs 500 full-time software developers. If all of Europe followed France's example to adopt the UN Open Source Principles for all publicly funded development - and prioritized open formats + protocols + interoperability - it would within only a few years be possible to greatly improve software reliability for all nations.

antxxxx 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

UK government standards say that government software should be open source by default https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/service-standard/point-12-...

Nextgrid 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> followed France's example to adopt the UN Open Source Principles

Has this actually produced any tangible results?

I'm all in for interoperability, open source and such but the primary purpose of software is that it should work and actually achieve its task. I'm always skeptical of such top-down mandates where engineering principles or ideas are being pushed over tangible outcomes, as it usually leads to endless bikeshedding and "design by committee", while the resulting solution (if any is delivered before the budget runs out) is ultimately not fit for purpose.

pveierland 4 minutes ago | parent [-]

I'm hopeful that it can work if:

- The top-down mandate is very general: e.g. "default to using or contributing to open standards, protocols, file formats, and interoperability".

- It's applied across many nations and organizations that can themselves choose how they wish to allocate their resources to achieve their specific objective. Meaning that the tax authority in Norway can contribute to a specific tax-reporting software project and collaborate with nations X + Y + Z on this specific project as long as it is fit for their specific purpose and mandate.

Ideally this helps incentivize a diverse ecosystem of projects that all contribute to maximize public utility, without forcing specific solutions at the highest level.

One example of a recent French software project is Garage which is an open-source object storage service. It's received funding from multiple EU entities and provides excellent public utility: https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/

digiown 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

I wonder if it would work if the governments provide some tax incentives for open source contributions similar to charity donations as well.

irishcoffee 32 minutes ago | parent [-]

Prompt: generate 15k in tax-deductible open source code contributions.

Result: all of our charities are being held hostage by ransomware.

digiown 22 minutes ago | parent [-]

I meant something like, as a deduction from payroll taxes as a proportion of worked hours by the employee if he works on open source projects. Obviously not perfect but I don't think it's much worse than the existing R&D type schemes.

internet2000 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've got no horse in this race, but, didn't they say the same things during the current US president's first term? Both about technology and defense. What came out of that?

Eupolemos 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Dane here.

Feelings are different now. IIRC, the most popular app in Denmark right now is an app that tells you if a product is American.

It has become broadly clear, that it is about self preservation.

Nextgrid 13 minutes ago | parent [-]

> the most popular app in Denmark right now is an app that tells you if a product is American

That sounds like performative bullshit though? A "feel good" thing just like plastics "recycling".

Are people actually choosing to pay fair price for a non-American product? Are people choosing to invest in or start local competitors to those American products? Are governments doing something so that incomes commensurate with quality tech work aren't taxed at 60%? And so on.

jakkos 8 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

First time round, Trump would consistently say lots of worrying stuff, but people in the US administration would stop him from following through.

This time, it's become quickly evident that he is following through.

The sentiment in Europe has changed from "well this isn't ideal, but we can just wait it out" to "this is scary and existential, we need self-sufficiency as soon as possible"

taneq 38 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

The wheels of Eurocrats turn slowly. (That was meant to be bureaucrats but autocorrect won this time. :D )

tsoukase 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

With the current speed of things, Europe will need a hundred years to effectively and totally set free from the US digital dominance. You will know if this timeframe gets shorter if a torrent of change, news and enthusiasm floods almost any European company, either IT or not, mobilize vertical and horizontal government agencies and a large share of the population actively participates.

jaesonaras an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Support a dictator, and one day he will come for you.

thedelanyo an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well they've finally awaken. Better late than never. I think this is one of the best decisions China got right.

Animats an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Most of this stuff is routine technology now. There's no reason for it to be centralized.

293736729129 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Does the EU regime grant its subjects independence from chat control? Or do bureaucrats try to force it on the sovereign again and again?

subprotocol 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The scariest part of US internet dominance isn’t vendor lock-in, it’s executive branch chaos engineering.

13415 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's more than just internet technology, though. Europe has no digital sovereignty at all. Every operating system is in US hands, most office and business software, Visa, Mastercard, Paypal, all social media commonly used, and so on. The list is endless.

jakkos 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

> Every operating system is in US hands

Desktop Linux is (becoming) usable for a normal person just in time, I was surprised how easily a non-technical friend switched over to Bazzite (immutable fedora with gaming extras).

> Visa, Mastercard, Paypal

The EU has already been working on a "Digital Euro" for a while

> all social media commonly used

I'm hoping more decentralized social media continues to pick up steam

johanneskanybal an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is pretty basic tech to replicate if it's needed though. It wasn't needed before so we just used what was there. But crazy to think the place you spawned from 2k years ago couldn't make another basic payment system if it was important lol.

Sharlin an hour ago | parent [-]

It's not a technical problem (well, it is, but not primarily). It's a social problem. Replicating a technology is one thing. Getting thousands and thousands of organizations to migrate is in a whole different universe difficulty-wise. The costs would be astronomical.

mrsssnake 29 minutes ago | parent [-]

Libre software should be used regardless. And the switching cost with it is still not low but drastically lower.

digiown 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Open source is basically sovereign (if Russia can use it), so there do exist functional alternatives for most of these things. It's mostly from inertia and network effects that the American ones are used.

Nextgrid 38 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Didn't Russia quickly spin up an alternative smartcard payment system and Android app store once they got kicked out of the US-based competitors?

jlehman an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, it’ll be much easier to put the surveillance measures they’ve been trying so hard for into EU-based companies.

dilyevsky an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Have they tried more regulation of the kind where your investment agreement has to be fully read out loud and in person by the notary to all parties?

yalogin an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As they should. It’s an incredible opportunity to develop technology natively and by extension wealth. The US has proven in this one year that it’s not to be trusted let alone relied upon. Unfortunately the tide once set in motion cannot be u done and the damage done in this one year is irreparable, may be now the tech billionaires will speak up and to use a phrase from Carney - take the sign down from their windows

dismalaf an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Europe wants a lot of things that they end up never actually doing.

nxm 4 minutes ago | parent [-]

Another opportunity for brunch with the other ministers

testing22321 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

At this point they’d be insane not to.

Headline could be “every country wants to end all reliance on US” and it would be the sane thing to do.

analog31 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Including the US. I don't want to be dependent on this stuff any more than anybody else does.

johanneskanybal an hour ago | parent | next [-]

This is the point of time in history where the people usually start a revolution. Do that.

SpicyLemonZest an hour ago | parent [-]

This is one of the things where the nature of the modern United States makes it hard. I routinely go around telling people that the current regime in Washington is illegitimate, nobody should obey them or listen to their lies, and that I look forward to the day they're ripped from their thrones and tossed in prison. In most places and times saying that would make me a revolutionary, but in the US it's not even arguably a crime.

lateforwork an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Exactly. I live in the US but I'd like to switch from US apps and services controlled by US oligarchs such as Elon Musk and Zuckerberg to European alternatives.

testing22321 an hour ago | parent [-]

Then you should do that.

I just moved all my hosting and domains out of the US after 15 years of good service.

bell-cot an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Like the life-long couch potato who wants to exercise daily and really get into shape...there is that dratted gap between "wants to" and "does"

hdhdhsjsbdh 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think they should. Let’s kick off some meaningful economic growth in Europe and provide a counter to the increasingly hegemonic, anti-human US tech oligarchs that have reaped all of the financial rewards of algorithmic radicalization and surveillance capitalism for the past 20 or so years. Maybe Europe can imagine something better.

lazide an hour ago | parent [-]

That would require some hard choices and actual hard work. It’s got to get a lot worse before it gets better.

jabwd an hour ago | parent [-]

I don't know, you might be underestimating how much damage the orange in charge is really doing to the interests of the US. Change is slow, and the subtle things set in motion are always perceived too late. A simple example would be a small county in germany saving 5+ million a year thanks to moving away from microsoft. Add that to the budget of the many (largely european) opensource projects out there , and you can see things can shift, slowly, but rapidly once noticed.

whoknowsidont 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I mean good. The U.S. is currently run by a pedophile ring and has legitimate Nazi elements in its employ.

Also O365 just sucks. We can do better. We've had better. Please stop using MS products and technology stacks.

cyanydeez 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Fascism and business are poison and catalyst

aa_is_op an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

By the time the idiot EU bureaucrats get to do something, they'll be replaced by right-wing loonatics sponsored by US tech giants: https://www.brusselstimes.com/belgium/1916422/us-tech-giants...

Yoric an hour ago | parent [-]

Maybe?

I have friends working on IT in public administrations, starting to prepare for a switch from US tech to EU tech.

flanked-evergl an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Trump has been trying real hard to get Europe to stand on it's own, maybe they do it out of spite. Would be awesome if we could maybe kick Russia (which is much weaker than Europe I'm told) out of Ukraine.

johanneskanybal an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Trump is an obvious Russian agent. Stealing money for himself and destroying all western trust is his only goal.

nalekberov an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

What Europe has got to do with Ukraine? Europe is much more dependent on Russia (for cheap energy resources) than it's on Ukraine, son. Besides, who forced EU to send billions of euros to Ukraine to fuel this pointless war - which only made Europe weaker than ever?

causalscience 34 minutes ago | parent [-]

Russian propaganda folks.

nalekberov a minute ago | parent [-]

Yeah, it’s hard to not call anything opposing your view a propaganda after being brainwashed for 24/7.